Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Bauxite Ramone  had the following query:

The only worry I have is [Snider]  now has 38 strikeouts in 86 at bats, that seems alarming to me [since returning from AAA].  Is that cause for serious concern?



We all watched Travis Snider came to the plate five times last night. The Yankee fielders could have stayed home. Snider put two balls deep into the right field stands and struck out three times.

Does this remind us of anyone?

Well, yeah.

The obvious comp is Adam Dunn. They were exactly the same age during their minor league careers, and accumulated a very similar amount of playing time.

Dunn was drafted put of high school, and played 343 games in the minor leagues from age 18 to 21. He had 1483 plate appearances and struck out 270 times (18%). He batted .304 and hit 63 HRs.

Snider, also drafted out of high school, has played 353 games in the minor leagues from ages 18 to 21. He had 1506 plate appearances and struck out 377 times (25%). He also batted .304 and hit 64 HRs.

Ok, that's a little spooky.

The obvious difference is walks. Snider drew 168 BB as a minor leaguer, which is a lot. Dunn drew 230 BB, which is ridiculous. Snider was more likely to get a hit when he put the ball in play (399 for 936, .426) than Dunn (367 for 938, .391) and hit considerably more doubles and triples (91 and 9) than Dunn (70 and 4).

As a major leaguer, Dunn has struck out in 26.5% of his plate appearances, and has hit .371 (1093-2943) on his balls in play. So far, Snider has struck out in 29.0% of his plate appearances, and has hit .372 (64-172) when he makes contact. We're looking at Dunn's entire major league career, of course, whereas Snider only has what amounts to about half of one season. But Dunn, strangely enough, was fully formed when arrived in the majors at age 21. Since then, he's had better years than his rookie year and worse years. But it would be hard to say he's developed from what he was then, when he hit .262 with 19 HRs in 66 games.

What can we tease out of this so far?

Snider strikes out more than Adam Dunn. Yikes. He struck a lot more often than Dunn in the minors, and he's striking out a little more often in the majors.

Snider was more likely to get a hit on a ball in play in the minors - he hasn't done that yet in the majors. One thinks he should be able to - he was able to in the minors, and he's certainly a better athlete. He definitely needs to be able to do that. As it is, there are already very good reasons to expect Snider's career to be a long struggle to hit .250, and we can expect to see him put up some pretty amazing strikeout numbers along the way. He's quite capable of fanning 200 times in a season, maybe even 215 or 220 times. Jose Canseco's single season team record of 159 Ks will be broken before Snider is eligible for arbitration. Carlos Delgado's career mark of  1242 should survive before Snider becomes a free agent, but Snider should be giving Lloyd Moseby a run for second place on the franchise list by then.

Snider needs to develop from where he is now. You always assume that a 21 year old will develop - but there are no guarantees. After all, Dunn didn't develop. Dunn didn't really need to, of course - Dunn didn't strike out as much as Snider, and Dunn also had his enormous walk totals working for him, allowing him to get away with hitting for a mediocre BAVG. For sure, Snider's power had better develop the way we all hope it will. It hasn't yet - he has 10 HR in his first 255 major league ABs (Dunn, at the same age, hit 19 HR in his first 244 ABs. Snider needs to get there as well, and he needs to do better than Dunn when he makes contact. As he did when he was a minor leaguer.

Does Travis Snider Like Baseball? | 79 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Denoit - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 07:13 AM EDT (#206140) #
To me it really seems like Snider is going through what Adam Lind went through in 2007. Swinging at alot of bad pitches up in the zone. I don't think its because he has a bad eye, he has had some at bats where he has taken close pitches and looks like he can get better at that. I think its more of just being too aggresive and trying to do too much. The kid has rediculous power, and probably will continue to strike out a fair amount as many power hitters do. But I would be really surprised if those K numbers didn't drop a bit and the walks go up as he matures.
AWeb - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 09:08 AM EDT (#206143) #
Snider can strike out all he wants, but it's not a sure thing that he will continue to put up huge K numbers. Some players actually do develop contact skills, even if Dunn didn't. The important thing for Snider is to not develop contact skills at the expense of his power. Also, his outfield basics need a lot of work so he doesn't become like Dunn in other ways (remarkably, consistently awful defensively at any position). Throwing to the right base and/or the cutoff man would be a good start. He doesn't have to be above average in the field if he hits, but needs to reach the Delgado status of "passable, not killing his value".

Does anyone have a good idea how much weight to put in minor league BABIP numbers? Snider always had huge BABIP in the minors, but it's not clear to me if this is something that should "translate" to the majors. This year is way down from anything he's done before.
Mike Green - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 09:27 AM EDT (#206144) #
Snider has faced almost exclusively right-handed pitching so far in his career. If you look at his career line through age 21, 300 PAs, 85 strikeouts, 19 homers, 25 walks, there are really no comparable major leaguers.  Usually, teams will keep a young player like this down for another year rather than essentially platooning him. When I put Snider's basic profile through Play Index for comparables age 21-23, I get three 23 year olds- Wily Mo Pena, Dean Palmer and Chris Davis.  Snider fortunately has a better offensive projection than any of them because of his age.
Olerud363 - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 09:48 AM EDT (#206146) #

I was at the game last night at New Yankee Stadium.   The first game I ever went to was at old exhibition stadium when I was 12 or 13.  Fred McGriff launched a moon shot that had the crowd gasping.   I don't recall seeing a shot like that (live) until last night.  It was surreal.   The homers looked like they were shot out of a cannon.  

All of Sniders swings were impressive.  Looked like he got fooled once.  But the other strikeouts he didn't look bad.   Violent swing, but still looked smooth.  Just missed some pitches.

 

Olerud363 - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 09:56 AM EDT (#206148) #

Mike I was also thinking about comparables. 

The closest would be another left handed hitter with tremendous natural power and a dynamite minor league record, who played for a manager that liked to platoon...  That hit incredible bombs early in his rookie season but then struggled so much he had to be sent back to the minors.  Who struck out at an alarming rate.    Who occasionally looked so bad at the plate that we wondered if he would make it after all.  Not sure how the Play Index works.  But there is an uncanny comparable....

Carlos Delgado - (1993-1995 age 21 through 23) 222 at bats, .194 5 doubles, 12 homers, .300 on base .378 slugging, 32 walks, 72 strikeouts.

Travis Snider- (2008-2009 age 20 through 21) 258 at bats, .248 17 doubles 10 homers, .319 on base, .430 slugging, 26 walks, 86 strikeouts.  

Mike Green - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 10:34 AM EDT (#206149) #
Delgado had torn up the FSL at age 20.  At age 21, he was promoted to the Southern League where he racked up a 102/98 W/K and an MVP award if memory serves.  It is true that he did have similar problems to Snider when he first arrived in the Show, but his minor league career was quite different both from a performance and pace perspective. Bill James wrote in 1993 after his FSL season that Delgado would be an MVP candidate in 2000; very few would have quite the same confidence about Travis who nonetheless has a world of talent.

When the Jays moved Delgado from behind the plate to the outfield, it may have affected his hitting until he found his home at first base.  Personally, I would make Snider my DH and just let him work on his hitting. 

Magpie - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 11:50 AM EDT (#206151) #
Obviously, the bright and shiny object that sent me off in hot pursuit were the striking parallels between Snider and Dunn as a minor leaguers. If you're looking for a successful major league hitter who strikes an awful lot, Adam Dunn is about the first guy to come to mind.

McGriff and Delgado are interesting names to throw into the mix. They both made their minor league debuts at age 17 and were completely overmatched in that first exposure to pro ball. But let's add their age 18-21 numbers, and make a Gang of Four:

                G    AB    R   H    TB  2B 3B  HR  RBI  SB  CS  BB  SO BAVG  OBP  SLG
Snider         353 1313  229  399  700  91  9  64  265  14  17 168 377 .304 .383 .533
McGriff        366 1289  193  324  591  59  8  64  202  12  11 201 407 .251 .352 .458
Delgado        473 1625  276  489  823  89  4  79  311  23  26 271 353 .301 .401 .506
Dunn           343 1208  263  367  634  70  4  63  220  60  21 230 270 .304 .415 .525
A couple of notes - McGriff lost much of his age 21 year in the minors to injury. He played just 51 games, hitting only .227 with 5 HRs.  As a minor leaguer, McGriff struck out much more than any of these guys. While his power and plate discipline were always impressive, he struggled to hit for average (largely because it was so hard for him to make contact. As a 19 year old in A ball, he fanned 147 times in 126 games, and performed similarly the next year.) He solved that problem as a major leaguer - he batted .284 over his career, the best performance of any of these guys, without losing the other parts of his game.

As a minor league hitter, Delgado was very, very similar to Adam Dunn. He's been a much better major league hitter than Dunn because he's been able to get the strikeouts under control and hit .280 as a major leaguer. (Delgado has fanned 1745 times in 2053 major league games; Dunn is at 1418 Ks in just 1274 games.) Delgado played a lot of minor league baseball - besides the 473 games shown here, he played another 31 as a 17 year old and would end up playing a total of 680 minor league games before establishing himself as a major leaguer. It should be remembered that during the period we're looking at, Delgado was exclusively a catcher.
92-93 - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 11:58 AM EDT (#206152) #
Olerud363, I too was at the game, and couldn't believe those Snider swings. I think you really notice in person just how hard he's swinging, it looks Prince Fielder-ish.
Magpie - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 12:02 PM EDT (#206153) #
Adding McGriff and Delgado to the mix does make me feel better about Snider. McGriff and Delgado are both Hall of Fame quality players. Unlike Dunn, McGriff and Delgado are both guys who were able to build and grow from the level of ability they had at age 18-21.  McGriff's development is especially impressive - he never hit above .272 in any of his minor league seasons. He seldom hit below that as a major leaguer.

Snider's plate discipline isn't as impressive as McGriff's or Delgado's, although it's still pretty good.
Olerud363 - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 12:13 PM EDT (#206154) #

Factoring in age is Sniders minor league record really less impressive??

Given the chance would Snider have torn up the FSL at age 20??  Instead he was on a 4-level journey to the majors hitting about .280 25 100 across the 4 levels.

At age 21 Snider hit .337 .431 .663 in aaa,  and is going to get 250 at bats in the majors.   If left in New Hampshire could he have gotten an MVP??

Bill James wrote glowingly about Delgado all the way.  The comment your refferring to is from the 1995 player rating book after his slump "...he'll be back and he'll be great.  I have no doubt that Delgado is going to be an MVP candidate in the year 2000.".

From baseball prospectus 2009- "After moving from high-A to the majors in 2008, Snider might allready be the best hitter in the Jays organization.  Once he reduces his strikeouts he's an MVP candidate."

And he may not even have to reduce the strikeouts.  The game is changing.  Thome had terrific seasons while striking out 180 times.  Ryan Howard won an MVP with about 200 strikeouts.  Mark Reynolds is having a great season and may strikeout 220 times.   

Helpmates - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 12:19 PM EDT (#206155) #

This post is reminiscent of some of the hand-wringing that used to go on with regards to Adam Lind...and a compelling argument can be made that Snider will be more of an impact hitter than Lind will (or is). 

The guy is TWENTY-ONE years old, people.  If you bother to read the scouting reports on Snider all you hear about is that he's smart, he makes adjustments, he functions pretty much as his own batting coach; he's going to catch up to the "speed" of the major league level.  Chill out.

Magpie - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 12:25 PM EDT (#206156) #
Factoring in age is Sniders minor league record really less impressive??

It's certainly comparable - he's not out of place in this group, which is impressive as all hell if you ask me. Again, Snider's plate discipline is merely good (the other three were exceptionally good.) Delgado in particular and McGriff as well spent their minor league careers in places that were very tough to hit (which is a big reason why Delgado's FSL season was so striking - and again, he was a catcher!)
Mike Green - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 12:32 PM EDT (#206157) #
Scouting reports are great and helpful, and I like Snider a lot, but his early promotion was a bit unusual.

The Jays aggressively promoted McGriff through Syracuse at age 20, where he walked 26 times and struck out 89 times in 70 games.  They then took a step back and kept him there for 2 years until he posted an 83/119 W/K at age 22 in Syracuse.  Even in 1987, when he was 23 and probably ready to replace Willie Upshaw, they platooned him. 



Magpie - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 12:37 PM EDT (#206158) #
If you bother to read the scouting reports on Snider all you hear about is that he's smart, he makes adjustments, he functions pretty much as his own batting coach; he's going to catch up to the "speed" of the major league level.

I'm inclined to agree - I think Snider is more likely to develop his game, as McGriff and Delgado did, than maintain what he was (is!) at age 21. He does need to - while that level of ability actually was good enough for Adam Dunn, it won't be good enough for Snider.

Delgado, of course, is well known as a guy who studies the game and keeps an extensive book on opposing pitchers. While nobody really knows anything about McGriff (the quietest star ever!), over the course of his career we saw him rebuild his swing and his stance along the way. Which suggests powerfully that he was working on his game (if his own quite striking development didn't already.)
Brian W - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 01:05 PM EDT (#206160) #
Off topic question: is it possible to submit an article for publication on the Box?  If so, who do I send it to?
Chuck - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 01:13 PM EDT (#206161) #

From baseball prospectus 2009- "After moving from high-A to the majors in 2008, Snider might allready be the best hitter in the Jays organization.  Once he reduces his strikeouts he's an MVP candidate."

And he may not even have to reduce the strikeouts.  The game is changing.  Thome had terrific seasons while striking out 180 times.  Ryan Howard won an MVP with about 200 strikeouts.  Mark Reynolds is having a great season and may strikeout 220 times.  

I don't believe it's BP contention that Snider's MVP candidacy requires a drop in K rate so as to circumvent a voter bias against players with high K rates. Rather, a drop in Snider's K rate would mean a higher contact rate and, presumably, higher AVG, OBP and SLG. The improved slash line would be what moves him into MVP territory. Absent the dropin K rate, he might not get there.

Matthew E - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 01:16 PM EDT (#206162) #

You send it to me. There's a page on this site that has information about submitting Pinch Hits; I'll try to find it.

Matthew E - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 01:19 PM EDT (#206163) #
Sorry, that was in response to Brian W. Among the helpful information in the FAQ (linked at the top of the page) are instructions for submitting Pinch Hits.
Mike Green - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 01:49 PM EDT (#206164) #
While nobody really knows anything about McGriff (the quietest star ever!), over the course of his career we saw him rebuild his swing and his stance along the way. Which suggests powerfully that he was working on his game (if his own quite striking development didn't already.)

We do know that McGriff's early development was aided by a good relationship with a fine hitting coach.
Mick Doherty - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 02:48 PM EDT (#206165) #

Mags, interesting stuff. And you sort of sideways-hint in one of your followup posts at another interesting question ... Adam Dunn -- Hall of Famer? I won't post a whole Hall Watch story on this because I don't think anyone sees Dunn as an obvious on-the-path choice. And his BBRef profile page suggests he is not even really halfway to "likely." His most-similars-through-age-28 are mostly not HOFers -- Colavito, Glaus, Brunansky, Maris. But there are a couple -- Killebrew, Reggie Jax -- and a couple more who might have gotten in if not for unrelated issues -- Strawberry, Canseco (and oh yeah, Barry Bonds) ....

It's that "halfway" concept that makes me think. You know, Dunn has 315 homers and he's not even 30. Some time this week or so, he will clinch his sixth straight 40+ homer season (is tht a record? Probably not, but still, wow) ... Let's stay he hits 600 homers, which is at least conceiveable, if not entirely "likely." He'd be one of the first non-steroid-tainted guys to get there since Aaron (Griffey -- anyone else?) ... I think that might could well get him in. Or is he going to get "Konged"?

I am shocked, by the way, that Kong (Dave Kingman) is nowhere to be found on the Adam Dunn Most Similar list!

TamRa - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 03:02 PM EDT (#206166) #
I don't see how you get "Konged" with 600 homers, even with revised standards. If he breaks 550 my guess is he gets in.


Mike Green - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 03:16 PM EDT (#206167) #
Dunn might get in to the Hall if he hits 550 homers, but unless he keeps hitting like he has this year, he doesn't merit it.  The problems are twofold.  He's been a very good hitter, but not a great hitter, and he's got nothing else.  He plays an unchallenging defensive position poorly and runs poorly.  In the result, he's done less to help his teams win in his 20s than Roy White did. 
jvictor - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 03:17 PM EDT (#206168) #

My worry with Snider is that Gaston ruins him.  Basically Gaston holds that his way and only his way, is the way to hit.  If you don't  agree you are shuffled aside or run out of town a la John Olerud.  Sidebar alert;  Man goes through old Baseball Americas.  Man finds issue from 1994, Blue Jays top ten prospects.  Among the notables 1) Alex Gonzalez,  2) Carlos Delgado, 4) Shawn Green, 6) Paul Spoljaric and 9) Shannon Stewart.  Question:  is this the best Top Ten the Jays have produced?  Where does it stand next to the big pitcher TopTen (Halladay, Escobar, Carpenter)?

FisherCat - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 03:22 PM EDT (#206169) #

It's funny that the first thing that came to mind when I read this post and all the subsequent comments, is that the only reason why we're discussing Travis Snider is because if he DOESN'T morph into a Delgado or McGriff type hitter...then the Jays are SCREWED!  End of story.

Unless the Jays retool this offseason by converting Halladay into 2 or 3 useful position players that are MLB ready (and thensome); Snider is the closest they have, for the next 2 or 3 years, to Manny / Big Papi or A-Rod / Texeira.

Think about what has occurred since JP arrived.  They pinned their hopes on VW & Hinske anchoring the offense...didn't happen!  Then it was gonna be Wells, Rios & Overbay...hasn't happened!  Now for 2009, 10, 11... the Jays MUST get strong consistent offense from Hill, Lind AND Snider if they are to even sniff 90 wins in the AL Beast division!  Unfortunately Hill and Lind need to reproduce this year's production (or 80% of it) for the next 2 or 3 years along with help from Travis or else we're lookng at a sorry few years ahead of us boys!

Mick Doherty - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 03:30 PM EDT (#206170) #

600 homers -- could anyone non-steroid-tainted (Sorry, Alex, sorry Manny ...) get there before Dunn might?Hmm.

  • Jim Thome -- now on the LAD bench -- needs 36, which is possible, but I think he's not get that left in him. He's a HOFer either way.
  • Gary Sheffield needs 91 and Carlos Delgado needs 127 -- neither one is getting there, steroid-tainted or not.
  • Chipper Jones has 424, but he's 37. Vlad Guerrero has 406, and isn't going to hit nearly 200 more, I'd think. He's 34, btw.
  • Ahhh ... Albert Pujols at 366, age 29. This generation's best hitter, might could well beat Dunn to 600, if either gets that far.
  • The only other active players younger than 35 who are at least halfway there already are Paul Konerko (324 at 33), David Ortiz (313 at 33), Lance Berkman (309 at 33), Carlos Lee (306 at 33), Richie Sexson (306 at 34) and Troy Glaus (304 at 32).

Everyone on that list is at least three years older than Dunn, and all but Konerko are behind him in career homers.

  • Mark Teixeira is second to Dunn in the under-30 crowd at 238, though the new Yankee Stadium might well Coors-ify his numbers over the next few years.
  • Ryan Howard is next at 215. Miggy Cabrera leads the younger-than-Dunn crowd with 204 at the tender age of 26.
  • No other under-30 active had more than 153 (Prince Fielder, who's just 25!); David Wright, also 26, has 140.

So yeah, it's Phat Albert then Dunn as the clear favorites to next clear 600. Did I miss anyone?

Mick Doherty - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 03:42 PM EDT (#206172) #
Off-topic, but looking at BBRef's all-time homer leader list, did you know that Ernie Whitt is currently in the top 500-- actually in a 10-way tie for 491st with some names you will know -- Carlos Baerga, Derek Bell, Mel Hall and Mike Pagliarulo among them? Actually, two are active, so they will bump down a notch next time Adrian Gonzalez or Pedro Feliz goes yard ...
Mike Green - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 03:43 PM EDT (#206173) #
I am guessing that Pujols has a better chance at 700 than Dunn has at 600.  With his great season in 2009, Albert will probably have a better career than Foxx's and may take a run at Gehrig. 
Magpie - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 03:46 PM EDT (#206174) #
My worry with Snider is that Gaston ruins him.

Well, he didn't ruin McGriff or Delgado. Or anyone else, come to think of it.

McGriff, by the way, was not a pull hitter. Even more than Adam Lind, McGriff hit an extraordinary number of homers to left and left-centre.
Chuck - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 04:07 PM EDT (#206175) #
I am shocked, by the way, that Kong (Dave Kingman) is nowhere to be found on the Adam Dunn Most Similar list!

Maybe the disparity in their walk rates is to blame. Kingman's AB:BB ratio was 11:1. Dunn's is not even 5:1.

Kingman doesn't get invited to the TTO alumni dinners.
Magpie - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 04:10 PM EDT (#206176) #
With his great season in 2009, Albert will probably have a better career than Foxx's and may take a run at Gehrig.

Interesting. Albert the Great is 29 - here's how he compares to Foxx and Gehrig at the same age:

Albert Pujols (2001-2009)
GPL PA   AB   R   H    2B 3B  HR  RBI  SB  CS  BB  SO  BAVG  OBP   SLG   OPS   OPS+  
1383 6010  5085 1066 1699 381 14 366 1103  59  30  802 566 .334  .428 .630  1.058  173   

Jimmie Foxx (1925-1937)
GPL    PA    AB    R    H  2B 3B  HR  RBI  SB  CS   BB  SO BAVG   OBP   SLG    OPS  OPS+  
1561 6605  5551 1216 1852 313 93 379 1345  71  53  985 859 .334  .435  .628  1.063  167  

Lou Gehrig (1923-1932)
GPL    PA    AB    R    H  2B 3B  HR  RBI  SB  CS   BB  SO BAVG   OBP   SLG    OPS  OPS+ 
1232 5470  4542 1075 1558 321 113 267 1146  63  68  806 508 .343  .444  .640  1.084  182  
Not bad at all. So far, Pujols has been slightly better than Foxx, who has about a one-year head start. Foxx had two more monstrous years left, and a couple of very good ones - but he was basically finished by age 33.

Pujols hasn't been quite as good as Lou Gehrig - but he's got a one-year head start on Gehrig, whose power didn't kick until his third season anyway. Hence Pujols' big lead in homers (366 to 267.) Gehrig would proceed to have five absolutely stupendous jaw-dropping seasons from age 30 to 34, but then he got sick at age 35. His career has almost no decline phase - it's just the one season. So he ends up with a career OPS+ of 179.

Hopefully Albert can avoid ALS and stay away from the bottle... in which case, you have to like his chances. In the end, he's unlikely to be quite as great as Gehrig, but he should end up a little better than Foxx. And obviously he's a good bet to last a lot longer than either, and do better in the counting numbers.
Mike Green - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 04:15 PM EDT (#206177) #
As for Kingman/Dunn, in addition to the W rates, Dunn had 3800+ at-bats through age 28 while Kingman had only 2600+.  Similarity scores are weighted heavily to counting stats, so the difference in quantity may be even more important than the W rate issue for that purpose. 
Chuck - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 04:38 PM EDT (#206178) #
Hopefully Albert can avoid ALS and stay away from the bottle... in which case, you have to like his chances.

And having no reason to doubt the authenticity of his birth certificate would help as well. Presumably the hounds are currently off the Pujols case having turned their attention to Mick's commander-in-chief.
Magpie - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 05:03 PM EDT (#206179) #
Bastian tweets that Carlson has been suspended for three games, beginning tonight.
Mick Doherty - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 05:12 PM EDT (#206180) #

Chuck, why would you question the authenticity of my wife's birth certificate?

 

lexomatic - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 05:49 PM EDT (#206182) #
Magpie, was anyone else suspended? because if it was only Carlson, that would be really offensive to me.
Thomas - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 06:01 PM EDT (#206183) #
They haven't announced the fines/suspensions for the Yankees yet. Maybe they'll do that later tonight or tomorrow. I don't doubt Posada will be suspended and maybe someone like Duncan will be fined. There is no way Posada doesn't get five games, considering the way the situation unfolded and Joyce's comments on the brawl.

Carlson was also fined $3,000 and Barajas was fined $1,000.
Magpie - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 06:26 PM EDT (#206184) #
Posada gets four games and $3,000 - Duncan is expected to be suspended as well.
James W - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 08:50 PM EDT (#206186) #
Like Carlson, Posada's 4-game suspension was knocked down to 3 in exchange for not appealing.  Shelley Duncan got 3 games, but is appealing. 
brent - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 09:11 PM EDT (#206187) #
I think Posada received a ridiculously minor punishment. He had already been ejected from the game before he ran back to attack Carlson. There was no heat of the moment there when a batter is struck by a 90mph pitch and is infuriated. He escalated the situation by clipping Carlson. This kind of behavior should be dealt with things like 10 game suspensions. 3 games is really nothing in baseball. If they are going to give out 50 games for first time steroid offenders, 10 games is not much for tarnishing the game with a brawl.
brent - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 09:30 PM EDT (#206188) #

I took a quick peek over at fangraphs to see how the Jays were stacking up against the AL and all of MLB. Although everyone has seen a lot of misery out there, this team is pretty average for the AL and actually above average compared to all MLB teams. Ignoring the W/L record can put things in better perspective - there are a lot of crappy teams out there and the Jays have to play 3 fantastic teams. It kinda skews our view disproportionately. Let me recommend to anyone to watch some of the other 29 mlb teams (especially some of the non-contenders).

 

In regards to roster construction, I wonder what others of you would think of the following idea. The Jays have a roster spot occupied by JMac. I think the Jays should find the fastest player they can that could still handle the utility infielder duties (probably a poor bat and a decent enough glove). Since Cito never uses JMac anyway, why not have a player that could make a difference in a tight game? The fourth outfielder could also take this role as long as the team would (ideally) call up a better hitting outfielder from AAA if there is an injury. I know other commenters have brought this point up before, but it never seemed to be fully examined.  

Mick Doherty - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 10:42 PM EDT (#206189) #

Agreed. Watching the Rangers up close, I can tell you that the fan attitude is much skewed by the fact that they are "contending" (or were until last week, which is just as well because this is a football town).

I think if the Jays and Rangers played each other 162 times, the Jays win 84-88 of those games. That's not necessarily true next year, as the young pitchers (Hunter, Holland, Feliz) get more consistent, but right now, the Jays are a "better" team than the Rangers -- W/L be danged.

ComebyDeanChance - Wednesday, September 16 2009 @ 10:58 PM EDT (#206190) #
My worry with Snider is that Gaston ruins him. Basically Gaston holds that his way and only his way, is the way to hit. If you don't agree you are shuffled aside or run out of town a la John Olerud.
I guess Cito was 'shuffling aside' Olerud when he had 679 pa's in 1993 at the age of 24. Some shuffle. And Cito ran Olerud "out of town"? I suspect that's the first anyone has heard of that. But I guess when you don't like a manager you can just make any nonsense up and post it on the internet, whether there's a shred of truth or not.
Mick Doherty - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 12:25 AM EDT (#206191) #

Some time this week or so, [Dunn] will clinch his sixth straight 40+ homer season (is that a record? Probably not, but still, wow) ...

Nobody took the bait and found an answer, so I finally Googled it ... and no, it's not a record. Ruth had seven.  A-Rod and Sosa both had six. Nobody else had more than five (Kiner, Snider, Griffey, Bonds). [Note, Griffey and A-Rod are still active, but their streaks are not.] So this month, Dunn will tie for the silver and next year, in 2010, will have a chance to match the Babe for the record. Only then will he turn 31 ... 

katman - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 01:04 AM EDT (#206192) #
He probably likes it fine. Hope he develops.

But no, development isn't guaranteed. If anyone needed an exhibit, Alex Rios is hitting below .150 for the Chicago White Sox. We'll see how he holds up - or not - next year. But right now, in a small sample size that nonetheless serves to highlight the key concerns about him... letting him go looks pretty damn smart.
TamRa - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 03:41 AM EDT (#206193) #
And Cito ran Olerud "out of town"? I suspect that's the first anyone has heard of that. But I guess when you don't like a manager you can just make any nonsense up and post it on the internet, whether there's a shred of truth or not.

That's hardly the first time that's ever been said. I picked up that claim way back when it happened.

It's neither new, nor original to this thread - it's been bandied about for years.

i don't know if any proof remains, but it was the commonly accepted story  - I never have heard anyone dispute it before just now - that Cito had little use for Olerud because, IIRC, he couldn't turn him into a slugging pull hitter.

Maybe it's a myth, but the poster you replied to is most certainly not making it up.

Magpie - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 06:03 AM EDT (#206194) #
It wasn't that Gaston didn't have any use for Olerud, whom he stuck into the lineup as a regular when he was a 21 year old who had never played a game in the minors. And it wasn't that Gaston wanted Olerud to start pulling the ball because ... well, because he thought it would be neat. The Jays were trying to solve a problem.

Olerud had all kinds of success (he'd hit .363, which is pretty good) by driving the ball into the left-centre gap. But AL pitchers eventually figured out that if you busted Olerud inside with hard stuff, you could handle him. The solution to that - the necessary adjustment - is to turn on that inside pitch and pull it.

That's what Gaston and the Jays tried to teach Olerud to do, and it just didn't work out. Olerud had a very difficult time adjusting his swing and his approach. Not because he's a difficult guy - quite the opposite - but some players are very, very reluctant to tinker with their swings. It's simply a hard thing for some players to do, especially young ones, to mess with the thing that got you this far.
christaylor - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 07:54 AM EDT (#206195) #
I have to agree with those who are pointing out how hard Travis Snider's swing especially in comparison to other players; especially when watched live - something I did not appreciate until I lucked into some good seats behind home plate at the dome. He just does not get cheated. I think this furthers the Delgado comparison as Delgado approach at the plate (and swing) in his prime as a Jay are (as far as I can remember) quite similar. Delgado whether swinging and missing or knocking a bomb swung hard. Ditto Snider.
christaylor - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 08:00 AM EDT (#206196) #
I couldn't agree more, Helpmates but on the other hand much of the hand-wringing over Lind occurred at the end of 2007 when the Jays were out of it. Fretting over the future is the past time of this time of year for fans of teams that are out of the race. I think Jays fans need an extra distraction as the organization as a whole seems listless and without a direction (no president, absent corporate ownership).

On the other hand, unlike Lind the coaching structure does not seem to be working well with Snider who has been said to have complained about getting too much advice and having too many voices trying to fix him. I suspect if/when he's given a job in the spring and left in the line-up to work thing out, he'll flourish. Hopefully, it happens next spring.

China fan - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 08:56 AM EDT (#206197) #

Has anyone noticed that Vernon Wells is hitting at a .500 clip over the past 11 games, with an SLG of .658 and an OPS of 1.193?    Where was this Vernon when we needed him?

If I can engage in some (probably naive) optimism here for a moment:   if the past 11 games are any kind of indication that Wells has finally remembered how to hit the ball, and might be headed for an improvement in 2010,  it could be hugely significant for the Jays.  With the departure of Rolen and Rios, a tremendous amount of pressure will be falling on Wells next season.  If the vortex of centre field can be fixed in the Jays lineup, and if the team can pick up a DH or 1B to help out (or if Ruiz somehow maintains his current .889 OPS next season), and if Scutaro can be signed, and if the young pitchers improve and the injured pitchers return  -- a lot of Big Ifs, of course -- the Jays might actually have a chance to flirt with contention next season.

On the negative side, I see absolutely no indication that Edwin Encarnacion is any kind of answer at 3B, and there's nobody waiting in the minors either.  So there's another huge problem that our bean-counting owners have helpfully created for us.

Jim - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 09:46 AM EDT (#206198) #
Not that Jesse Carlson is hurting, but how does he end up with the same fine as Posada?  The Yankees escalated the situation causing Carlson to have to throw behind Posada, then Posada created the other two situations.  3,000 isn't a dent in Posada's world, Carlson it's a decent amount of money for a guy who could be out of the majors for good after a bad month.
Jim - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 09:48 AM EDT (#206199) #
SI had an article yesterday where a GM, an agent and the writer predict contracts for the offseason.  The predictions for Scutaro were around 14 for 2 or 21 for 3.  If this team is taking the payroll down it's time to go find the next Scutaro and not get stuck owing this one a ton of money.
China fan - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 10:45 AM EDT (#206200) #

$7-million per year is not a lot of money for an excellent shortstop who can field, hit leadoff and get on base.  Especially if it's limited to two seasons.  I don't see any evidence that Scutaro will fade into mediocrity next season -- the disbelievers are those who simply assume that he cannot repeat, based on his pre-2009 history.  That's a guess and an assumption, not based on any concrete evidence.  Signing Scutaro to a new contract would be a great move.  Of course, with current ownership, I have absolutely no faith that they'll even make the effort to do so.

 

AWeb - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 10:46 AM EDT (#206201) #
Not that I think the Jays are likely to resign Scutaro, but is there a compelling reason to think he must absolutely not be good next year. Yes, this is clearly a career year, but even a declined Scutaro is one of the top 10-15 SS in the majors, unles his defense evaporates. Not exactly a great position in MLB right now, but still - he's not easily replaced, and teams don't trade away SS prospects very often.

His hitting production has gone up for two obvious reasons - taking more walks and hitting more flyballs. Taking more pitches/walks (a huge change in total pitches per AB this year, from 3.6  to 4.1) doesn't seem like a skill that should decline. His BABIP isn't unreasonable, neither is his HR/FB, which is in line with his career. Yes, he's 33 years old right now, but that doesn't mean a huge drop is coming. How many years have Jays fans been waiting for such a decline from Jeter (35) and Posada (38)? Seemed like 2008 was the start, but both jumped back to all-star hitting this year. The Yankees for years have been built around, more than anything, huge production from weak positions (CF in the Bernie Williams days, C and SS). Anyone can spend money/trade for 1B and corner outfielders. Obviously Scutaro isn't a HoF level player, but some guys just last a long time anyway. 

If the Jays have intentions on winning in the next few years, they need a SS, and Scutaro is the best they've had in a long, long time. If the Jays won't sign Scutaro to $7 million/year for 2-3 years, then they better be heading for a fire sale instead - that's not that much money for a good SS.
Dewey - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 11:19 AM EDT (#206202) #

I finally figured out that the heading for this thread alludes to JP's snarky comment about Adam Dunn.

I'm always amazed at how easily a rumour gets dug in, and then hangs around.  Awful business.  The one about Snider being recalcitrant or simply difficult seems to me utterly without foundation. Yet it continues to be repeated here and on the air, as if it were fact. The kid seems to me like a class act. Polite, diligent, “coachable”, as it is said. And there hasn't been a better hitting prospect since Delgado. As Helpmates advised, chill out. ( I do wonder how well he's accepted by his team-mates: sometimes the truly exceptional person gets ostracised to a degree.)

christaylor - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 11:20 AM EDT (#206203) #
On Scutaro, I'd like to see him resigned but $7M is too much unless the team is going to reverse the current trend of cutting payroll. The better road would be go with an all-field no hit SS, however, I doubt Scutaro will fetch that much this off-season. There will be too many doubters given his history. Anything about 2y/10M would be too much.

Now that the Jays are mathematically eliminated, I've been (probably like many other bauxites) looking into what the failures have been (other than the whims of old man Pythagoras) one that I hadn't thought about was how the Jays has fallen on its face this season. Only 4 relievers have WPA above 0 this year, Frasor, Accardo, Murphy and Richmond. Given that Frasor has the only one that's been used with regularity out of the pen, that's says something. While, many ascribe 1-run loss with luck purely, it makes sense that the pen plays a role given that many run one losses end with when the pen blows it to the home team.

JP has shown the ability to find gems for the pen and hopefully he'll be able to assemble a better group next year. It will certainly be an easier problem to deal with than the hole at 3B which might have to be filled by EE, although I have some faith that he could return to his 2008 form and improve defensively working with Butterfield.
christaylor - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 11:30 AM EDT (#206204) #
addendum: I missed Camp (WPA 0.08) and Cecil (0.01) but that doesn't change that the bullpen has been bad which is very different from how it has been the past few seasons.
Magpie - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 11:52 AM EDT (#206205) #
Yet it continues to be repeated here and on the air, as if it were fact.

Just to be clear - I was having a little fun with the startling parallels between Snider's and Dunn's minor league records. No other similarities, real or unreal, are suggested!
Jim - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 01:10 PM EDT (#206206) #

 the disbelievers are those who simply assume that he cannot repeat, based on his pre-2009 history.  That's a guess and an assumption, not based on any concrete evidence.

Isn't it a guess and an assumption that he's going to play as well next year as he did this year?  The first 2500 of his career don't count as much as his first 100 this season?  The whole year looks great but how much of that is the first 120 plate appearances (280/420/505), since then 286/373/396.  Clearly still a good year but a player you wan't to invest a good amount of your payroll in for his age 36 season when we know what history shows us on players who debut at later ages?

This is the utilimate example of buying high.  Signing 34 year olds coming off career years to multi year contracts is about the worst strategy a baseball team can have. 

Love Scoot, and he's had a great year but it's time to pray he accepts arbitration and if he doesn't wish him well in his future endeavors.  This team needs to get to the business of actually rebuilding the roster into something that can actually compete in this division and getting 2 picks for Scutaro is a step in the right direction.

John Northey - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 01:26 PM EDT (#206208) #
Any team that pays out $7 mil a year for 3 years to Scutaro will be disappointed.  This year doesn't just say 'career year' it screams it. 
  • With 3 more games he'll be at his career high in games played, he is nearly 100 PA above his previous high
  • Of the other stats at B-R on the basic page the only area he won't be at a career high or within 1 of it is triples.  With 1 sac fly and 1 HBP he'll be at career highs for those too thus leaving no category shy of a career best unless he doesn't get into 3 more games. 
  • He did all of this at age 33.  Most of the time peak seasons occur between 25-32 but 33 isn't far off and strongly suggests 'career year'
  • Before this year his OPS+ ranged from 79 to 96 - however outside of the two outliers his OPS+ were 85-87-89 thus I'd pencil him in for a mid-80's or lower (due to age) next year
  • His fielding doesn't really appear to have improved based on some other stats - 91% of balls reached made into outs vs 90% lifetime - his horrid year (2006) he made outs on just 84% of those balls.  Given his age odds are this will start dropping soon
  • PA while at SS - 5528 - is far higher than ever before.  His previous peak was under 3000 and he could easily be at double any other season by the years end (he already has played against more batters while at SS than any other two seasons combined in his career). 
What does this mean?  A 33 year old who is pushed beyond any physical limits he had before for games/innings/etc. while playing a key defensive position is not likely to hold up well.  It has been a wonderful year for Scutaro and fun to watch.  However, this will NOT continue. 

Of note: for the % of balls turned into outs - for comparison Tony Fernandez at his peak hit 97% with 3 seasons at 95%+ and a career mark of 89% but had just 295 PA at SS after age 33.  Ozzie Smith, viewed as the best ever, peaked at 98% with one other over 95% but was lifetime 91% and reached 90% just once after age 35 (ie: what would be year 3 of a contract for Scutaro).  Alex Gonzalez (Toronto edition) is lifetime 91% as well but didn't play a single out at SS after age 33. 

Shortstops do not fair well after age 33.  Scutaro has beat the odds to have his amazing year this year but to bet on him doing anything close to it for the next 3 years is pure folly.  A one year deal?  Sure, why not.  More than that though would be a major mistake unless you pay him at utility man levels as that is what he probably will be by year 2 of any deal.
Mike Green - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 01:46 PM EDT (#206209) #
What is Scutaro worth objectively?

Hmm.  His career line is at .266/.337/.385.  Well over half his career was spent in an environment which depresses batting averages because of expansive foul territory.  He has just had a career year with a positive W/K out of the leadoff slot (this is very impressive), with higher IsoP than usual but not unheard for him (see 2006).  He turns 34 next month.  My guess is that when ZIPS/CHONE/PECOTA come out in a couple of months for him, the average will be at about .273/.347/.393 for 2010. 

As for his defence, UZR has his range ratings for the last 4 years at short at -11.2, -0.1, 6.0, -0.9.  The two extremes are in seasons with less than 600 innings.  I think that he has had essentially average range at short.  He consistently has made fewer errors than average (whether at short or at second).  He is likely to lose a little bit of range due to age, and likely to maintain his better than average error rate.  I project him as an average defensive shortstop.

In other words, he's a Bill Russell/Scott Fletcher quality shortstop.  These guys have usually been undervalued by the market.  Placido Polanco was a heckuva player for a number of years and maxed out at $4.6 million.  I make Scutaro as worth $7-9 million per year (Fangraphs has him at $16 million per year over the last 2 years).  Whether he'll get the Lugo-range numbers that he deserves or be stuck in Polancoville is an open question.
92-93 - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 02:11 PM EDT (#206211) #
I posted numerous times early in the season that JP should have been looking to extend Scutaro for something like 2 years, 6 million. I didn't think a 34 year old career backup who has made less than that over his MLB career would turn down that kind of financial security (even with his hot start and impending free agency), because surely he realized how fleeting such an opportunity could be. At the worst the Jays would have been stuck paying 3m a year to a guy who is incredibly versatile off the bench (they had no problem wasting similar dollars on Bautista this year) and at the best they saved $ on their starting SS. I really wish JP would have pursued this avenue, so the team wouldn't have to worry about overpaying Scutaro next year, because these numbers flying around are absurd.
Mike Green - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 02:16 PM EDT (#206212) #
Scutaro would not reasonably have accepted $3 million per year after the start of 2008.  He was quite obviously worth a helluva lot more than Bautista.  $4-$5 million might have worked, and might still. 
Mike Green - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 02:18 PM EDT (#206213) #
Ack.  I meant "after his start in 2009". 
Mike Green - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 02:27 PM EDT (#206214) #
What do people think of the Scutaro/Tony Phillips comparison?  Both started out as utility players in Oakland and didn't really get a chance until 30 years old.  Both flourished when they left Oakland, with notable improvements in W/K.  Phillips continued on well into his late 30s.  Phillips started out as a shortstop, but ended up predominantly playing the outfield in his later years.
Dewey - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 04:44 PM EDT (#206219) #
Magpie - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 11:52 AM EDT (#206205) # Yet it continues to be repeated here and on the air, as if it were fact.

Just to be clear - I was having a little fun with the startling parallels between Snider's and Dunn's minor league records. No other similarities, real or unreal, are suggested!



Yes, I know, Magpie.  I was thinking of TV the other night when either Rod Black or Jamie Campbell (can't remember) repeated this rumour about Snider as if it were simply fact.  Spreading misinformation.
Spifficus - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 06:06 PM EDT (#206220) #

Yes, I know, Magpie. I was thinking of TV the other night when either Rod Black or Jamie Campbell (can't remember) repeated this rumour about Snider as if it were simply fact. Spreading misinformation.

With some of the stuff they prattle on about on telecasts, that's not surprising. They just don't have anything actually useful / insightful / amusing to say. Can we have Tommy Hutton back, please? Actually, I kind of mean that (well, not Hutton in particular - I'd hate to break up the Hutton / Waltz combo. They're my second favorite crew to Kruk and Kuip). An awesome TV duo would go a long way to improving the TV product. With some mlb.tv umm, tweaking, I always try to watch the other teams' telecast. Only the Rays crew is definitively worse... Wait, no. Angels, too (Hudler is just a bundle of nervous cliched energy).

Mylegacy - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 07:21 PM EDT (#206225) #
On Scoots and Snider...

I agree, whoever signs Scutaro will overpay - 'cause he's clearly having a career year in 09. However, we have zero, zip, nada, none, we are bereft of SS's in the system... IF we don't resign him we will have to give Magpie, Ozzieball and Mike Green tryouts for the position - a thought best left un-thought.

Pastornicky and Jackson (IF either actually make it) are about three years away - I say - sign him - three years 18 million. Do we REALLY have a choice? No Rolen, no Scutaro, no hope?

On Snider - remember his FIRST game - he was playing LF and someone hit a Texas leaguer out to him for which he ran in manfully and dove - a wondrous belly flop it was - came up short and the ball bounced to the wall. He got up - obviously in pain - trying to ignore it and BLUSHED - BLUSHED even more than his usual full time mini-blush. I think - Snider has more tools than the Carpenters Union - the question is - will he get his little mind around the professionl game? I think he'll be at LEAST Fred McGriff - more likely Carlos Delgado. Personally - I'll take either - or a meld of them.

Interestingly - next year we could have Hill, Lind, Ruiz, Snider and a rejuvenated (career year) Wells ALL hitting over 30 homers each! Or not.

Chuck - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 07:51 PM EDT (#206226) #

I think he'll be at LEAST Fred McGriff - more likely Carlos Delgado. Personally - I'll take either - or a meld of them.

As a lifelong McGriff fan, I think it needs to be pointed out that the McGriff-Delgado continuum is an extremely narrow one with very little room for someone to wedge themselves into.

McGriff logged 10,174 career PAs at a 134 OPS+ rate. Delgado is at 8,657 and 138. I don't know that Delgado has 1500 PAs of health left in him. If he did, those PAs would presumably narrow the career OPS+ gap even more.

I'm not sure what a meld of these two would look like.  Can two players get more similar? (BB-REF has them ranked #6 and #8 on the list of each other's most similar players.)

Chuck - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 07:59 PM EDT (#206227) #

Interestingly - next year we could have Hill, Lind, Ruiz, Snider and a rejuvenated (career year) Wells ALL hitting over 30 homers each! Or not.

Not wanting to play Eeyore to your Polyanna, I'd say Ruiz is in trouble of fulfilling your wishcasting. If Gaston can't seem to find playing time for Ruiz at the expense of Millar and Bautista with the team 58 games out of first place (and Ruiz actually playing well), it doesn't look like he figures to get many AB in 2010.

krose - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 10:17 PM EDT (#206233) #
The large gray pachyderm inhabiting the corner of the room must be pointed to!!

The Blue Jays have an exceptional SS on their active roster. The SS hole could be filled without creating another chasm. Move Hill to short stop; Inglett gets first try at second.
Matthew E - Thursday, September 17 2009 @ 10:51 PM EDT (#206234) #
It's by no means guaranteed that Hill would field adequately at short. He didn't the first time they tried it.
Dave Till - Friday, September 18 2009 @ 06:29 AM EDT (#206236) #
Hill has position-specific skills at 2B, and is doing very well there. Besides, the only other second base option the Jays have is Inglett, who is no longer young.

As for signing Scutaro: the Jays' biggest priority for next year is to ensure that there is enough money available to sign all the draft picks. If there is money left over to sign Scutaro - knowing that this is his absolute peak year, and that the Jays won't get this much out of him again - I'd say go for it. The Jays have no shortstop options in the farm system.

jerjapan - Friday, September 18 2009 @ 08:03 AM EDT (#206237) #
Not wanting to play Eeyore to your Polyanna, I'd say Ruiz is in trouble of fulfilling your wishcasting. If Gaston can't seem to find playing time for Ruiz at the expense of Millar and Bautista with the team 58 games out of first place (and Ruiz actually playing well), it doesn't look like he figures to get many AB in 2010.

Assuming Cito is back.  After watching him sit on his hands during the worst run I can recall in recent years, admonishing fans for not showing up while batting Millar cleanup, overusing Bautista while Snider sits out, playing Johnny Mac in left, and talking about how he's not sure he wants to come back to managing after this contract, I hope he's not back.  Cito's a class act, a great manager with a veteran roster that he can deploy properly.  Give him fading vets and he will overuse them - in this case, at the expense of someone who could be a productive and affordable bench player for his pre-arb years. 

Ruiz has done nothing but disprove the 'he's been in the minors a long time, he must suck' stance in his admittedly small sample of appearances.  He's the best story going to this fading fan.  He toughed it out when he got hit in the face.  Why not play him?
James W - Friday, September 18 2009 @ 09:20 AM EDT (#206239) #

Why not play him?

I had heard that Adam Lind tweaked something so he needed the DH spot over playing LF.  Cito's decided he'd rather have Jose Bautista in the OF or Overbay at 1B instead of letting Ruiz play.

krose - Friday, September 18 2009 @ 02:31 PM EDT (#206248) #
It's by no means guaranteed that Hill would field adequately at short. He didn't the first time they tried it.

You catch the ball, you throw the ball. Hill could be an above average fielding SS and an exceptional hitting SS. Inglett leads off, followed by a rejuvenated Wells. Lind hits third and Hill cleans up.

mathesond - Friday, September 18 2009 @ 04:14 PM EDT (#206256) #
You catch the ball, you throw the ball

You make it sound so easy - I'm surprised there aren't more shortstops available for the picking
Magpie - Saturday, September 19 2009 @ 06:32 AM EDT (#206262) #
You catch the ball, you throw the ball.

You're leaving out "getting to the ball." Otherwise Albert Pujols would be a very fine shortstop.

As has already been noted, when Hill played shortstop he made almost as many errors as Russ Adams. He did this without being able to match Adams' range.

Pujols is a very good first baseman, and Hill is a fine second baseman.
cybercavalier - Sunday, September 20 2009 @ 06:35 PM EDT (#206280) #
So do you guys think Snider should start at Las Vegas next year, batting 3rd; just like Ruiz did this year? Or promote him to MLB for good.
Chuck - Sunday, September 20 2009 @ 07:05 PM EDT (#206282) #

Travis Snider has nothing left to prove beating up on AAA pitching. He should be in the majors to stay. While his current slash line of 229/304/403 for an OPS+ of 87 is not impressive for a corner outfielder, it is impressive for a 21-year old. Most 21-year olds are in the low minors. Lind was in A-ball at 21. Snider is not embarrassing himself at this level.

And this is not a Jose Guillen-type case of prematurely being promoted at 21. Guillen leapt from A-ball to the majors. Snider has 600 AA/AAA ab-bats under his belt.

Snider has many years of development ahead of him, with his theoretical peak still 6-7 years off. He may not crack an OPS+ of 100 in 2010 (though I'm beting he will), but in the majors he'll at least be learning against the best competition available. It's not clear that he'd be learning anything in AAA any more. He'd just be proving that he's too good for that level.

Does Travis Snider Like Baseball? | 79 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.