Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

Interesting poll question from Bauxite Ron: "If you were a player about to be drafted or about to become a MLB free agent, would you want Scott Boras to represent you?" Explain your answer in "Comments"!

Yes 117 (60.62%)
No 76 (39.38%)
Interesting poll question from Bauxite Ron: "If you were a player about to be drafted or about to become a MLB free agent, would you want Scott Boras to represent you?" Explain your answer in "Comments"! | 13 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mick Doherty - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 10:34 AM EST (#160913) #

As always, send suggested poll questions to media.relations@battersbox.ca. No promises on what willl be used or when or for how long, but suggestions are always welcome!

ayjackson - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 10:49 AM EST (#160915) #

I said no because you're market is no longer 30 teams when he's you're agent.  My primary focus in life is not money and so I'd want my options of places to work left wide open.

I think Boras' strategy maximized income for himself and his client base on the whole, but has the ability to backfire in specific cases.

I'd like my agent to work as hard as Boras, but to also reflect my values when it comes to dealing with people across the negotiating table.

CaramonLS - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 10:51 AM EST (#160916) #
You bet I would. 

Chances are I'd be going to a good team (since they are much more likely to draft a Boras client than a bottom feeder), and I'd be getting the best deal possible.

But, I'd probably still hate Scott Boras.
Paul D - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 11:38 AM EST (#160924) #
This is a great question...

In the end, I went with no, although I'm basing this on the being drafted part.   If I were a free agent I might lean towards yes... as a free agent you'll have some knowledge of the situation/cities in MLB, where you do and don't want to play.

I'm sure that if you went to Boras and said "I only want to play on the West Coast" he'd get you a great deal, and probably get an East Coast team or two in on the bidding.

However, as a draftee, the risks you take are just too big to mess around with your draft position.

Yes, he typically gets a great deal for his clients.  But if you're first round talent, you're getting set for life money anyways (if you're conservative with it), and the downside of becoming the next Matt Harrington* is so huge. 

Not only that, but Boras seems to think that holding out for a year is a good strategy.  Personally, I think that's a terrible thing to do as a draftee.  If, as a draftee, you think that you can one day play in MLB, your goal needs to be to get there as soon as possible, and start that service time clock as quickly as poosible.  Any decisions that delay this process seem like bad, bad moves to me.

*I realize that Boras didn't represent Harrington the first time he was drafted.  However, he did tell him to turn down $1.2 million the second time he was drafted.

VBF - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 12:03 PM EST (#160926) #

I've heard at least three GMs this offseason respond to a question about acquiring a free agent by saying "He's a Boras agent isn't he?". I'm not going to lie, VBF wants as big a contract as he can get, but I don't like the fact that teams will not pursue you because of the agent you have.

Ryan Day - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 12:40 PM EST (#160928) #

 Early in my career, I want Boras. If I'm being drafted, who knows what could happen - if I'm a pitcher, every pitch I throw could be my last. So I want enough money to look after myself for a while in case my dream career doesn't turn out perfectly.

  After the arbitration years are done, I might want to switch to another agent, and relax with a bit more career security. But then again, I have no idea what it's like to turn down several million dollars, so who knows what might happen?

Jim - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 12:58 PM EST (#160929) #
I don't see why you would pick anyone else.  He doesn't get to make the decision for you, you can take whatever deal you like, but he's going to get you the maximum money wherever it is you want to be.
Smithers - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 05:28 PM EST (#160938) #

I may not like Scott Boras as a person - although I wouldn't even recognize him if I walked by him on the street - but for sure I'd want him busting the GM's balls while negotiating my contract. In the immortal words of Cuba Gooding Jr. in Jerry Maguire (which may have been based on Leigh Steinberg but is probably more applicable to Boras):

"Show me the money!"

Mylegacy - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 06:25 PM EST (#160940) #

I thought about this quite a bit before I answered, "No."

I've met lawyers like Scott. Ultra aggressive, ALWAYS trying to push the outside of the envelope. You read about the successes, BUT, personally could you (I) afford to be one of the ones that got caught in the gears? AND, Scott has left a few torn to pieces in Never Never Land.

I want ALMOST ever penny I've got coming. BUT, I also want to be where I'm comfortable. There's lots of good agents, I don't need the mad dog to be happy.

andrewkw - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 07:20 PM EST (#160941) #
I would not want Boras representing me if I was about to be drafted for one reason.  I would not want to risk or even threaten to sit out a year unless I got the offer I wanted.  If Boras was an option then I'd be a high draft pick and be able to cash in regardless.   Perhaps if I was a middle of the rotation free agent and was worried I have not earned enough to be set for life I'd consider him otherwise no.
Michael - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 08:15 PM EST (#160942) #
I'm sure there are other good agents that would be good to have too.  But I think it is a no brainer that if Boras wants to represent you then you should go with him.  He's clearly the top agent and has a huge staff and can get you the best deal possible.  You don't have to agree with him or set $ as your top goal, he can get good money for people playing for whoever they want.
Joanna - Thursday, December 14 2006 @ 08:58 PM EST (#160947) #
Money is lovely.  He is the rep for a lot of high profile players and has gotten them some fantastic contracts.  What I don't like? I know his name.  He has a reputation, GMs see him coming.  His clients have a stigma attached to them because of their association with him.  If I am a big stud ballplayer, the only rep  I want preceding me to the bargaining table is my own.  My agent should be unknown and I should be number 1.
Ron - Friday, December 15 2006 @ 02:46 AM EST (#160966) #
If I could choose any agent in baseball, I would pick Scott Boras. He has a proven track record of landing mega contracts. We hear all the talk about how teams avoid drafting Boras clients and how teams will stay away from his free agents. But last I checked, the players he represents are still able to sign major league contracts with major league teams. As a player entering the draft, I like the fact Boras scares away cheap (usually teams with bad records) teams. I want to get the most money while joining the best team possible. The same could be said if I was about to become a free agent. It's important to remember you are Boras's boss. You can veto any contract he thinks is good for you.

While I know there are a lot of Boras haters out there, I'm not one of them. The players union should be thankful he is still an agent and not retired.

Interesting poll question from Bauxite Ron: "If you were a player about to be drafted or about to become a MLB free agent, would you want Scott Boras to represent you?" Explain your answer in "Comments"! | 13 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.