* Gabriel Moreno: 11pa, 2hr, 4rbi
* Vlad/Bo/Kirk/Biggio: 86pa, 0hr, 2rbi
Bold predictions for 2023 AL East #OpeningDay
Alek Manoah misses 2 months with an injury.
Gabriel Moreno makes the Jays regret trading him instead of A. Kirk, who struggles, spends time in AAA
It wasn't quite to this extreme but I wasn't actually that far off.
Minnesota - Revenge.
Baltimore - Rivals.
Philadelphia - Cut of their jib.
Atlanta - A.A. comeuppance.
Texas - Retribution.
Houston - Fools.
L.A. Dodgers - Fools.
Arizona - Chase Field is nice.
I remember Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis driving in a semi-circle to avoid Texas en route to the Grand Canyon. No, it was not a Bull Durham/League of Their Own mash-up. Thelma and Louise, for young'uns. Susan had her reasons. But Dallas, specifically? I don't get it.
I don't know. I'm guessing that my intense dislike of the football team managed to both linger for decades after I stopped watching football while infecting any other franchise in the same area code.
In short, don't expect the O's to be a 100 game winner in 2024 unless they improve their pitching. Much like the Jays decided to chase down more pitching/defense the O's should do the same this winter and hope for their sakes they don't have every hitter flop like the Jays did.
- Best of 7 rounds every round, reseed after each, add 2 more teams per league so everyone plays all the time.
- Go back to 1 game winner takes all WC round so the teams getting a bye don't get stale from too long a rest, best of 7 DS, LCS, and WS.
- Round robin to cut down to 4 teams then best of 7 LCS and WS. RR would be 6 teams per league, so each plays the 5 others twice lets say - Tue/Wed, Fri/Sat, Mon/Tue, Thur/Fri, Sun/Mon - that covers 5 rounds, higher ranked team gets home field for each 2 game set. So ignore division winner except as tie breaker #1, then use same tie breakers as done now. The RR could've been Baltimore vs Minnesota, Tampa vs Jays, Houston vs Texas R1; R2 Baltimore vs Jays; Tampa vs Texas; Houston vs Minnesota; R3 Baltimore vs Houston, Tampa vs Minnesota, Texas vs Jays; R4 Baltimore vs Texas, Tampa vs Houston; Jays vs Minnesota; R5 Baltimore vs Tampa; Texas vs Minnesota; Houston vs Jays. Jays get 1 home series, Minnesota gets none, big incentive to keep fighting for positioning there if you believe in home field advantage. Baltimore plays all their games at home. Best 2 records go to LCS to face off for WS, with the days off your #1 catcher could catch all the games, you use 4 starters still but could go with 3 if you have a horse who can pitch on 3 days rest (if you have only 2 good starters then the temptation would be sky high). Ties broken by record vs tied team, best run diff vs tied team, then best run differential in RR, then best regular season record, then tie breakers from regular season. I see it as a potential crazy fun time.
This year the wild card round was best of 3 and started Tue Oct 3rd. If you instead made it best of 5 and have it scheduled for Tue 3rd-Sat 7th, you'd still have a good run. Start the division series Sun 8th (1 day later than they actually started) and have it a best of 7 going Sun 8th-Sat 14th (which is the same day the current best of 5 division series ends).
Have the league championship, if a 7 game series, start Sun 15th-Sat 21st (which today is only game 5 of the NLCS, and an off day between day 5 and day 6 of the ALCS). Have the world series, if a 7 game series, start Sun 22nd-Sat 28th (which today is game 2 of the WS).
So that gets you extra days in the schedule and still ends earlier.
If you want you could add an extra day off between each series and that only puts you at the WS ending on 31st of October (which is game 4 of the WS on this year's schedule).
Alternatively you could make the league championship a best of 9 and the world series a best of 11 and (without the extra off days) that would take you six extra days from ending on Sat 28th to ending on Friday Nov 3rd (again, only if the WS goes the distance to a full 11 games). Today's WS schedule has a game on Friday Nov 3rd (game 6) and Sat Nov 4th (game 7). So you could fit in the same time as today's 3, 5, 7, 7 playoffs a best of 5, 7, 9, and 11 all in 1 fewer day. Add a scheduled off day before the WS and you take up exactly the same number of calendar days as it does today (and actually probably less as I think an 11 game series is less likely to go to game 11 than a 7 game series is likely to go game 7) and you get in theory an extra 8 games in the first round, 8 games in the second round, 4 games in the 3rd round and 4 games in the final - so 24 extra playoff game possible! A single player would go from having the possibility to play 22 playoff games (3+5+7+7) to 32 playoff games in a single season (5+7+9+11).
So that's my proposal to make the playoffs both more "fair" and also more lucrative and (arguably) more exciting. When teams are changing locations you may need to make the last day at a site a day game to give some travel time (but it is only like 6 hours from plane from SDN to BOS or the like, which is the worst commute, +3 hours for time zone - that is doable in a single turn around with flights), and there may need to be double headers if there are rain outs, but that all adds to the excitement from my POV. If you really want to you could add a man to the roster to help (or add a pitcher that is only allowed to come in during extra innings and/or double headers).
That's my pie in the sky idea. With all the rule changes, I think this would be a good one (but I'd go for robo umpires calling balls/strikes as the most needed rule change remaining).
Now that the Guardians are here, can Atlanta please change their name to the Peaches or the Peanuts or the Outcasts or something and stop that stupid chop.
The Jays had trouble scoring runs and beating good teams all year, so the outcome shouldn't be a surprise.
Tampa was beaten up and the injuries were piling pretty high.
They finished so high because they had an incredible start.
The Jays were really good in April but it didn't feel like it because Tampa was beating weak teams and hardly ever losing.
Twins won the second game because of defense and pitching and a lucky home run from a guy who came at plate 0 for 12 in the postseason.
Every series is pretty much a toss up.
It's easy to rationalize why so and so beat so and so but only after the fact.
And we were lucky to see Bo's & George's home runs!
So something weird will happen every year IMO. Then there are the playoffs where the weirdness quite often increases.
Baltimore is getting crushed in 3 games.
Does that make you guys feel any better?
And of course, if it comes to Jordan Alvarez vs Kyle Farmer, I know where my money is.
Sucks as a Jays fan to be swept, but there is some comfort in seeing the O's and Rays get swept too.
Baltimore with Aaron Nola and Blake Snell will be a problem.
Baltimore counting on Dean Kremer and Tyler Wells will finish 3rd.
In the NL I expect St Louis, SD & SF to compete next year. That leaves Washington, Pittsburg, Colorado and possibly the Mets as noncontenders. I cannot figure out the Mets but the other teams should have good farm teams.
In the AL I expect NYY to do something and improve. I don't know about Boston. Baltimore will improve their rotation and also have a strong farm. TB should be fine and better health will help. Texas and Seattle I expect to make improvements. Houston will be good unless they lose some players to FA. Minnesota is good this year and should continue. Cleveland dropped a lot from 2022. I don't count them out.
They Jays should have V good pitching in 2024. Injuries and poor performance from any of Gausman, Berrios, Bassit and Kikuchi could happen. Manoah, Tiedemann and others will probably get their opportunity. The pen is very good now, without adding anyone. Many AAA bullpen prospects are pretty much ready or very close. The OF could be improved but I don't think it will be. I am sure that discussions will take place regarding the D/O being balanced in the OF. Cam Eden provides elite D in the OF and was drafted as a SS. Biggio from July onwards was much better. Biggio's D is good enough I think. When Springer is not in the OF Eden/Varsho/Biggio should be able to do OK. The big problem is can this team improve the in game management.
With everyone healthy, it's truly a devastating lineup. Absolutely no rest for a pitcher. If you're facing 7/8/9, that's Lowe, Jung and Taveras with Semien and Seager waiting if one reaches base. That's a pretty tough inning by anyone's standard. I have always enjoyed teams that beat the opposition into submission, and that is the 2023 Rangers.
Evan Carter elevates the entire club, and Bochy has introduced him with the skill you would anticipate.
Fangraphs prospect report at the beginning of 2023 says: "not enough power for stardom" He was 20 and 6'4", 190, and that level of certainty for a young player is more for entertainment than anything. We'll see if it ends up merely incorrect or an egregiously wrong projection. He's got a level swing, but I wouldn't be surprised if he slugs .550 next year and is the MVP of the league.
"I have never covered a team in my life where there was as much whispering about dissatisfaction with the GM, with the information, with some of the coaches." - Jeff Blair on the Blue Jays on Blair and Barker
— Brandon Wile (@Brandon_N_Wile) October 10, 2023
You never know.
I wouldn't mind a rematch of Houston vs Philadelphia.
I wouldn't worry too much about their payroll.
I think the Jays are more likely to add a high end starter than the O's are despite the depth already here. I doubt they will, but they could (the Jays seem to add someone each winter)
If the Jays want to make amends with their fans, they could make a big bid for Yamamoto. I’m guessing the Jays will focus on offense instead, but it might make more sense to go for quality first (Yamamoto), even if it’s in the pitching department, over adding a couple of average-ish position players. As Mike Green pointed out, the current Jays pitchers are probably a bit overrated.
Remember Shapiro is talking at 11 tomorrow.
Well, obviously it would be Atkins' fault.
Ross Atkins will return as #BlueJays GM, Mark Shapiro says, citing his belief in the value of stability and continuity.
— Keegan Matheson (@KeeganMatheson) October 12, 2023
“The body of work to me is undeniable.”
Mark Shapiro on the Moreno & Lourdes for Varsho trade: "I still feel like that was a good trade" & it takes multiple years to assess a deal properly
— Ben Nicholson-Smith (@bnicholsonsmith) October 12, 2023
"He has to be much better in both on field and off field decisions, but other than that his body of work is undeniable!"Mark Shapiro on Ross Atkins:
— Ben Nicholson-Smith (@bnicholsonsmith) October 12, 2023
"Ross needs to get better, but he's done a good job"
Specifically, Jays need to score more & be better on bases. Plus: "a higher level of communication of transparency" with players & staff.
Mark Shapiro not expecting major philosophical shifts in Blue Jays payroll. “I expect us to stay in the same area,” he said.
— Shi Davidi (@ShiDavidi) October 12, 2023
Shapiro says that repeater CBT constraints won't affect their decision-making. Where the team is at competitively and where revenue is are bigger determinants.
— Blake Murphy (@BlakeMurphyODC) October 12, 2023
Asked about possible extensions for Bo Bichette, Vlad Guerrero Jr. & others, Mark Shapiro declined to get specific but says "the priority is just to sustain the opportunity to win" #BlueJays
— Ben Nicholson-Smith (@bnicholsonsmith) October 12, 2023
However, behind the scenes he knows the fans are angry and he knows 2023 was a disappointment. What will he do or say behind the scenes to make it better?
He also said he knew that the plan was to bring Kikuchi into the last game to turn around the left handed hitters. He just didn't know when. I assume that means Atkins knew that too. Last Saturday Atkins should have said that instead of saying it was all Schneiders doing.
-Clarifying chain of command for on-field decisions
-Baserunning and other execution issues
-Hitting coaching
-Need for clear communication between front office, manager and players
-Willingness to make sufficiently aggressive bids for game-changing free agents (Cole, Seager, Freeman)
-Prospect acquisition and development
Hmmm...the list is getting long.
Gerry is right the important thing is that these issues will be addressed in private. The analytics dept cannot predict how the hitting and pitching will play out inning by inning.
Agreed. If a RH starter gets into trouble early, you may as well switch to a LH long man to also gain the advantage of flipping the platoons. But if your RH starter is not struggling, why impose your "solution" on a non-problem? In that situation, as you said, you can wield your LH relievers with precision, later in the game, to address the Twins' platoons.
Any mathematical modelling, if done well, has value for macro-level decisions, not for micro-managing. This is a misapplication of mathematics and sullies the term "analytics", which in baseball, is the broad term used whenever numbers are involved, even poorly. (Truthfully, the corporate world does the same thing. I was there.)
The Berrios/Kikuchi game was macro information implemented in a micro setting, carried out sledgehammer style.
I'll reiterate something that I said a few days ago. I suspect that Rogers is extremely happy with the way 2023 went. That makes Shapiro bullet proof for the foreseeable future. So, expect 2024 and 2025 to look at lot like 2023. It really could be a lot worse, you really can do a lot worse than Shapiro and Atkins and we could be fans of the Tigers or Angels - but don't expect the Jays to be reaching for the stars any time soon.
At least Shapiro acknowledged that the team's baserunning was God awful! Progress.
Aggressive bids for game-changing free agents - done for 2019/20: Ryu (2nd in Cy the year before signing), 20/21 Springer (All-Star 3 of 4 years before signing, MVP votes in 3 of the 4 years), 21/22: Gausman (all-star, 6th in Cy voting year before, smart to let Ray go 1.8 bWAR vs Gausman's 6.5), 2022/23: Bassitt (All Star, 2 time Cy votes in past 3 years). All 4 of those guys were ranked in the top 15 free agents their respective winters (Bassitt #13, Gausman #5, Springer #3, Semien #15, Ryu #9). Rankings from MLB Trade Rumors.
So since the Jays shifted from 'give the kids a shot' to trying to win they have signed 5 guys in the top 15 - 1 or 2 each winter. Given that the Jays should be expected to do that again this winter if they want to keep payroll roughly where it was this year - requires around $40-50 mil to be spent. Who qualifies? MLB.com has a Top 10 from late September. Ohtani (DH/P), Bellinger (CF/1B), Chapman (3B), Snell (LHP), Hader (LHP), Nola (RHP) Eduardo Rodriguez (LHP), Lucas Giolito (RHP), Jordan Montgomery (LHP), Yoshinobu Yamamoto (RHP - won MVP & Cy in Japan 2 years in a row).
Keep an eye on Shōta Imanaga (LHP Japan) who the Jays were known to be scouting - seen as a solid 2/3 starter entering his age 30 season 10.6 K/9 vs 1.4 BB/9 last year, his last 3 years were all ERA sub 3, BB/9 sub 2. He could be a good 2-3 year option for the rotation vs someone like Yamamoto who'd be a 5-10 year option (safe to say the 25 year old wants a long term high dollar deal, or a 4-5 year deal big per year but lets him go for a massive one at 29/30).
Could be a fun winter again. I expect the Jays to chase a slugger for LF/DH while letting the kids take over 3B/2B with Biggio/Espinal as the safety net. #1 target almost certainly is Bellinger, I expect a lot of tire kicking on all of the top 10 by the Jays though as 1 more high end starter would be nice and opens up trading Kikuchi (cheap contract which is highly valued by all teams) for help elsewhere.
Also, the Jays reportedly considered a four-year deal for Semien, but went with a one-year deal instead. That was a situation where the front office may have been a bit too clever in chasing value moves. They identified the right player, but were overly concerned about limiting medium-term risk.
We should pretty much expect to continue what we've had - a good not great team that will always be in the mix for a playoff spot but likely not ever a true favorite. A team that in any given year can win if things go mostly all right.
And to be fair - this is exactly what many wanted to happen, so really they should be mostly happy to have an FO that can give us a team that should be able to get in the playoffs "lottery" as often as not, and hope to get lucky at the right time.
Myself, it's also what I expected as soon as they were hired, but for me that was more of a negative than a positive. But I could easily be wrong, and as long as they can make the playoffs they'll have a shot.
Shapiro is safe as a church mouse right now. Atkins not so much. If the Jays fail to make the playoffs in a manner like the Mets/Yankees this year (vs 1 game out like 2021) it is safe to say Atkins is gone fast, probably followed by Schneider and a full fast rebuild.
Prospects? What matters most is are we getting high end ones who can fill in everyday roles? Schneider looks very promising, O Martinez really jumped his status this year (#88 MLB) as has Tiedemann (#31 MLB). But the Jays need more to climb up and prove themselves. Schneider was an unknown until he made it (made only 2 top 30 lists that I know of - ours and Blue Jays Nation with mentions on TSN and Prospects 1500 - FanGraphs had 41 for example without him, same with other big names). Yeah, a system like the O's have at the moment would be sweet but I'd rather not watch 100+ losses for 3+ years to get there. We need to steal more front office talent from the Rays imo - how they stay in contention despite no budget and no tanking since 2007 (2016 was their only season since then that fits into the Devil Rays era of 90+ losses) is amazing.
Odds are the WS will be a Texas team with 90 wins vs Philly or Arizona (90 and 84 wins respectively). Just get in and hope your team gets hot.
I'm not so excited about the farm system. They have not hit on a lot of top drafted players and they seem to be pulling too many smurfs on the international side.
They have gone too analytical in game management and likely player acquisition. They can stop watching Moneyball every week. The reality is that if you draft 6'3" outfielders who have lots of tools you can always trade them as other teams covet them. Signing a 5'8" infielder isnt exciting anyone and he is going to wind up being Rafael Lantigua or Vinny Capra most times if you're lucky.
It will be an interesting off season. There are some big decisions to be made with Manoah, Vlad and Kirk. They all have to come back healthy and in much better shape. I dont know if Atkins has the communication skills to make that happen.
b) do you feel comfortable assuming that Manoah will be a durable and good starting pitcher next year? I’m assuming no production from him in 2024.
Gurriel has had a good playoff but not a 'wow' (238/238/429). Moreno has been a 'wow' (250/294/813) but might be hurt (left hand hurt) but seems OK according to reports.
Agreed. They have Manoah, Ricky T and even Bowden Francis lined up internally. They could get a backstop rebound candidate for cheap.
SP isnt likely where they need to blow the budget unless Manoah isnt progressing during the winter.
I similarly advocated for Darwish when he was posted. I expect the same outcome next year (Yamamoto signing with a US team).
Just my opinion, I could of course be wrong.
But didn't you assume the same of Berrios, Kikuchi, and Ryu heading into this season?
But if Shapiro is satisfied with 3 playoff appearances in 4 years without a single win (plus a narrow miss), boneheaded coaching decisions at crunch time, and lots of regression from almost all of the team's top young talent (no, not you, Bo) then he is in the wrong job. I'm sure Rogers is thrilled with him but just like Atkins, he's now had his chance to show some accountability and he's also refused to do so. Not surprised but also not impressed.
One can never assume health - you need backup plans. Right now we have 4 starters who we can sorta rely on, but Kikuchi is coming off his best season ever and Manoah is a total question mark now (could be a Cy contender, could be in AAA all year, impossible to know which right now). I know if I ran the Jays I'd be looking to get value from Kikuchi this winter by making him available in trades and try to find a starter who is reliable to fill in that slot. Do you go for 'wow' but might get hurt (high variability but high potential) via someone like Snell (Cy Young potential every year, but also gets hurt a lot)? Do you roll the dice on Yamamoto? or go for a guy who has shown he can eat innings like Aaron Nola (3 years in a row of 32 starts, 180+ IP but twice with an ERA+ in the 90's and a 123 in there).
As I said before - there aren't many hitters out there so improving the pitching more could both help the team and get you a trade chip (adding a starter lets you trade Manoah or Kikuchi for help elsewhere).
The teams willing to acquire a pitcher would sent prospects, not valuable hitters or relievers.
You don't acquire pitchers just because they guys you have are great and healthy.
The predictions for next year will be higher, not lower.
Of course, they will likely regress because regression goes towards the mean, but that doesn't mean they can't sustain this level next year either.
The challenge is to make use of the guys they have on the 40 roster.
Last time they offloaded a bunch for Merrifield and Chapman.
This time, it might be more important to slot a bunch on the 26 roster so they can afford the clean up bat they're missing.
I don't know if Francis can start. For some reason, they've drastically shrunk his innings total.
He can probably survive a couple of times through the rotation.
Not a lot of guys can hit curveballs these days.
I did have relatively low expectations for Berrios and Kikuchi entering 2023.
I think the current Jays quartet is a starting point (although I'll be surprised if they are this healthy and effective next year). I guess where I disagree with others is that they would be fine with adding a pitcher to the back end of the rotation, whereas I would think it would be smart to add one to the front end. That is what Texas did in the off-season and at the trade deadline, and what Houston did at the trade deadline.
Talk is always cheap, and no one is obligated to believe a word Shapiro says. But "Accountability lies at the top. It lies with me, that responsibility" isn't exactly a refusal.
Agreed. If a RH starter gets into trouble early, you may as well switch to a LH long man to also gain the advantage of flipping the platoons. But if your RH starter is not struggling, why impose your "solution" on a non-problem? In that situation, as you said, you can wield your LH relievers with precision, later in the game, to address the Twins' platoons.
Any mathematical modelling, if done well, has value for macro-level decisions, not for micro-managing. This is a misapplication of mathematics and sullies the term "analytics", which in baseball, is the broad term used whenever numbers are involved, even poorly. (Truthfully, the corporate world does the same thing. I was there.)
The Berrios/Kikuchi game was macro information implemented in a micro setting, carried out sledgehammer style.
Very well said, Chuck. I particularly liked the contrasting phrases "wield your LH relievers with precision" and " the Berrios/Kikuchi game was ...carried out sledgehammer style". Scalpels not sledgehammers.
Of note: for Inherited Runners the Jays did great - only Adam Cimber was worse than the league average of 32% scoring (45%) while everyone else was below 30% with Jackson, Hicks, and Bass all at 0% scoring. Richards the best of full season guys at 1 of 15 scoring (!).
FYI: Romano is at 97 saves so he should crack 100 next year. He'll easily pass Billy Koch (100), and Osuna (104) with Ward in his sites (121) in 2024 but Henke is still a ways away for the Jays team record (217). No Jay pitcher has 100 wins to his name, let alone 100 as a Jay.
For hitters: Bo should get to 100 HR (at 89 now), Vlad 150 (130 at the moment), Biggio could get to 100 doubles (73 at the moment). In no shock to most Vlad is at 92 for GIDP and should crack 100 in 2024 and with 20 could catch George Bell for 3rd in Jays history (not hard to imagine) leaving Bautista at 127 and Vernon Wells at 146 as future 'targets' he doesn't want to reach but probably will. Vlad is #11 all-time for the Jays in HR's with #8 Lloyd Moseby in eyeshot (149) but #7 would require a very strong year (Barfield 179) and an MVP historic season to get higher (#6 is George Bell with 202 - needs 73 to pass him and catch Bonds) He'd need to sign a long extension to catch Carlos Delgado for #1 (336).
You can absolutely add a SP and trade one for a good bat. Look what Miami did by trading Lopez for Arraez. Sign a SP then trade Manoah and Kikuchi to teams that need the lower cost asset. A team like Milwaukee or Cincinnati for example.
Jays were in on Gerrit Cole with a big offer according to reporters.
Jays were in on Seager according to reporters hut he had no interest in playing in Canada.
Jays were in on Verlander and he almost signed here according to Justin Verlander.
Jays were in on Freddie Freeman according to Carlos Baerga who accurately called many signings. Apparently his wife wanted LA or Atl.
Apparently Cody Bellinger didn't want to sign with Toronto last season and won't sign with them this season. Kinda like Springer and Russell Martin, the Jays will need to overpay in years to sign these guys.
You can't use Mayza or Cabrera because the Twins had good right bats to pinch hit with.
You don't want to bring Garcia to face lefties either.
It's really the walk to the first hitter that screwed everything.
The real problem was not scoring runs. Nobody has won without scoring at least 3.
Any other team in the postseason would have been happy with those 2 run allowed.
Once the season start, you can't trade productive guys for productive guys.
All trades will involves low cost controllable players.
Manoah isn't worth much right now, he's worth even less if the Jays shop him around.
Kikuchi is a 4th/5th starter. There's no need to move him and there's tons of pitchers on the market.
Maybe they need to do another Semien type deal. Overpay on a short contract or front load massively with opt outs. They'd be little risk for Othani on a 1 year deal if he isn't pitching or playing the field. The sponsorship opportunity is intriguing. Canada is a huge market.
https://www.mlb.com/news/featured/how-evan-carter-became-the-rangers-second-round-draft-pick-in-2020?t=mlb-pipeline-coverage
If you have Pedro Martinez (V good) and S Marcum (pretty good) both lose a lot at the 7 inning mark. Also compare Juan Guzman and Pat Hentgen. Hentgen did a lot of complete games if I remember correctly Guzman did not.
So basically smart strategy is needed for the players to have faith in the FO/managing. This is my point because the Jays will find a way to lose rather than find a way to win. Which means that "player acquisition" IMO is not as important as many on da Box feel. I am fine with people disagreeing with me.
No questions were asked about stadium renovations. Also more importantly no questions were asked about the shift to better D at a cost to O.
“This season was a grind,” he said. “It was not ever easy. It was extremely frustrating and it was challenging. I’m not sure why. We still won 89 games. But, you know, I’ve been in the game 32 years and I can’t remember a season that felt like it was more of an effort.”
Note also that Moreno was discovered by two AA hires - Plasencia and Rosario - back in 2015 when AA was still in charge, even though they didn't sign him until 2016 when he was 16.
In Baltimore I thought Peter Angelos was willing to spend money. We will have to wait and see.
At one time Detroit had 3 potential HOFs on their roster at the same time. Scherzer, Verlander and Miggy.
They also once had Trammell, Morris (ugh) and Whitaker, the latter of whom the VC should damn well rescue. (And they should do Grich at the same time.)
Thats Trump level hyperbole.
Moreno bWAR 4.3
Varsho bWAR 3.9
Not sure I see that - he hit 239/308/441 over the past two years in Arizona, and had solid minor league numbers before that. Then he hit a very similar 255/313/448 on the road this year, while completely cratering at Rogers Centre.
I don't know how to explain that, but I don't think the issue is a fundamental issue with his bat.
Moreno does look very good now, but it's still small sample size. Perhaps he is a true All Star. But it's also not outside any realm of probability that Varsho himself hits another gear. Yes Moreno had prospect pedigree, but so did Varsho which I think people easily forget. He was also a Top 100 prospect who had a 161 wRC+ in AAA (small sample) and a 159 wRC+ in AA. He was actually a very elite hitter all throughout the minors. This wasn't Kevin Pillar or some other basic "grinder" who worked his way to above-average MLB performance on defense; he was the 68th overall pick in 2017. Perhaps he has some catastrophic flaws in his swing that will forever limit him as a low BA guy, but it's interesting to look at his MiLB numbers because he was never that type of hitter coming through Arizona's system.
I think this trade still has a lot of potential to even out going forward, regardless of Moreno's 2023 playoffs. If we're going by just playoff samples, I guess the Diamondbacks are simply a categorically better team than the Dodgers?
The structure of the pre-80 Committee is particularly weird because it is composed of veteran media types. How this experience qualifies you to decide whether Bobby Grich or Billy Herman (say) deserves induction is beyond me. You may or may not have seen Grich play, but you didn't see Herman. What you want is people who are knowledgeable about the history of the game. Some media types might be but most aren't. You need to get 3/4 of the votes, and that seems to be a recipe for poor decision making.
I think people massacred AA for trading prospects for old and decrepit, overpaid, and injury prone "assets" which ended up cratering his team by burdening the payroll with players who were in many ways no longer even producing up to their inflated salaries. This by the way was a very real mistake of his, and it's one that he never repeated once he left this organization.
Not sure what that has to do with Moreno or Varsho at all.
Varsho is at least still young, controllable, and makes peanuts. Sure, it was a great idea for AA to trade "crap prospects" for Josh Johnson (who it turns out had actually FAILED A PHYSICAL prior to that trade) and Jose Reyes. And then he traded "crap prospects" to get rid of Reyes while at the same time needing to pick up Tulowitzki's shit-tier contract, but hey, Tulo's defense guided us to the playoffs that one year or something (haha).
Maybe AA should have traded more crap prospects this past deadline given how soundidly his team just got slapped by the Phillies. Their offense looked as futile as ours.
I remember Pat Borders as World Series MVP...it certainly was a harbinger of things to come.
I remember Pat Borders as World Series MVP...it certainly was a harbinger of things to come.Let's not forget the time we traded 35 year old future HOF'er Steve Pearce and "didn't get enough back" because he ended up hitting like Barry Bonds for the Red Sox in the playoffs on way to winning World Series MVP lol.
Varsho: 3.5-3.4-3.4 fWAR (2.1 in real life in 2023)
Moreno: 2.0-1.8-2.0 fWAR (1.7 in real life in 2023)
So Varsho underperformed by 1.4, Moreno by 0.3 in 2023. The big question is 2024/25/26 (Varsho under control those years) and 27/28 (Moreno under control those as well). If Varsho gets back to the 3 WAR level expected for him while Moreno stays around 2 per year then it'll be a close trade in the end, slight edge to Arizona. No where near the 'disaster' so many want to call it. Mix in the high odds of Moreno losing time to injury (see the playoffs - hit in the head by a swing, and ball off his hand, miracle he didn't miss more than a few innings each time) and it isn't hard to see this going the Jays way.
A big key for 2024 will be figuring out why the Jays hitters sucked at home. Home park was a slight pitchers park overall (97 where 100 is neutral for 1 year park factor). Here are key guys who are returning...
- Varsho: Home: 182/254/323 vs road: 255/313/448
- Vlad: H: 238/324/391 vs r: 289/364/494
- Springer: H: 249/326/393 vs R: 266/329/416
- Bo: 287/324/443 vs R: 325/354/505
- Kirk: H: 285/348/441 vs R: 215/321/274 - the exception.
I understand the trade and my immediate reaction was: I don’t like it but I see why they did it.
It’s going to look worse as time goes on because Varsho looks clueless most abs. Alex rios got waived while hitting better than Varsho did because they didn’t want to pay him.
If he plays like he did again this year they need to move on. It’s that simple.
Moreno/Gurriel for Varsho
Gomes/Aviles for Esmil Rogers
There are absolutely things to like about both Varsho and Moreno and there are multiple ways that this can go. But Varsho has to outperform Moreno over the next 3 years (fairly significantly) to make the trade a good one from the Jays's perspective due to the extra years of control. Odds are against that but not impossible - the most likely way for that to happen is Moreno being a C isn't able to get on the field nearly as much as Varsho. I think its very unlikely that this ends up being a terrible trade for the Jays but its also nearly as unlikely to be a good trade.
Moreno and Varsho provide superb D for a C and a CF. The Moreno arm is elite and Varsho's speed is elite.
I am thinking a bit that the Jays may be modeling themselves after LAD. LAD does very well in the Latin market I believe. The Jays could be doing that if prospects start arriving in the next 2 years. Kirk and Moreno have already arrived. Regarding the draft IMO the Dodgers philosophy is to pick high ceiling rather than low floor. Barriera and Nimmala are high ceiling as was Manoah, A Martin and Groshans. With Bo they got lucky but that too counts. Logan Warmoth and Zeuch were probably high floor.
Also I don't know if LAD has done a rebuild in the last 30 years. They trade decent players like Stripling and M White for unknowns that may never work out. The Jays have had to make trades to just get into the playoffs but LAD got Scherzer exclusively for the playoffs. So both LAD and Toronto have to win/be competitive to attract the fans.
This game presents an interesting insight into the way old farts think, or at least this particular old fart. SD/BOS. With a minimal amount of time in Winnie the Pooh's thinking spot, I could come up with the new SD shortstop -- it wasn't that long ago that he played for BOS. But no, the brain starts conjuring names from decades ago and I land on Fred Lynn almost immediately, not even trying to be cute and playing the rarity game.
Armed robbery at the Cards DR complex.
Another factor is where would Moreno have played here? If he was a meh LF (due to Kirk/Jansen being locked in at C) then his 104 OPS+ mixed with, lets be generous and say league average fielder in LF would've put him pretty low, around 1.2 bWAR, while Fangraphs appears to push even lower around 0.7 fWAR I think - his offense gets knocked down a bit by his poor baserunning (not Kirk level, but poor none the less) and I'd have to figure if he was left in LF that would hit his numbers hard. He might have had tons of DH time, or who knows? Jansen's injury wasn't until late and I doubt the Jays would've benched Kirk or Jansen to get Gabby more playing time. Odds are he'd have been in AAA most of the year instead.
On the scale of bad trades by Jays GM's this isn't anywhere near the top 10 at this point and probably won't ever be. David Wells after a 20 win season (just 1 year of control left) for an injured pitcher who never played here has to be near the top (or his release pre-free agency the first time pre 1993 with 192 wins left on his arm). We also have Woody Williams (6.9 bWAR for SD, 18 overall post-Jays) and others for Joey Hamilton (0.3 bWAR as a Jay), Michael Young (17.2 bWAR first 6+ seasons, 24.7 overall) for Esteban Loaiza (2 1/2 years, 3.7 WAR and painful to watch pitch). Those ones came to mind immediately (yeah Ash was a nightmare GM). People like to spit on the Dickey for Syndergaard trade for obvious reasons, but Dickey did give us 7.1 bWAR vs Syndergaard's regular injuries and total of 13.7 bWAR for the Mets. Yeah, a net loss but not as lopsided as it felt when Syndergaard emerged (just 3 full seasons for the Mets and a 4th near full vs Dickey's 4 full seasons here of 29+ starts each time, last year fewer due to the Jays not trusting him enough). Now, all of those are FAR, FAR worse than Moreno for Varsho to this point (by bWAR Varsho is ahead of Moreno, but not Moreno + Gurriel with Gurriel a free agent once the Diamondbacks are done).
IMO anyone claiming this is the worst trade ever haven't paid any attention to Jays history. Could it end up bad or even worst ever? Sure it could. But it'd be hard to reach the Wells for nothing or Williams for Hamilton, or Young for Loaiza deals.
And if he has some middle outcome, the trade will ultimately be judged on how Varsho does, and, to some degree, on how Jansen and Kirk do.
I promise not to argue Davis Schneider's Hall of Fame case until at least 2026...
Atkins should have traded Kirk or Jansen not Moreno. Detractors of the trade just felt the Jays could have had Moreno and a new OF acquired via trade using another player.
Vlad 2.0 bWAR 117 OPS+ $14.5 million
Ryan Noda 2.3 bWAR 121 OPS+ $720,000
a) Moreno seems to be a better hitter than Varsho
b) Varsho’s elite defense will probably start to taper off in a year or two
c) Moreno is several years younger and therefore has more upside
d) Moreno has more years of control
If Varsho can make some hitting adjustments, the trade could look a lot better for the Jays (I’m not optimistic based on what I saw in 2023, but you never know).
Every team left in the playoffs except Arz have minimum "5 performing studs."
Jays only had 4 studs performing (Gausman, Berrios, Bassit, Bo). They need Springer and Vlad to perform better to get to 5 or 6 studs. What's more, TOR only had 1 hitter vs 4 from HOU, 3 from Philly and 4 from TEX.
Phillies - Nola, Suarez, Wheeler, Castellanos, Harper, Schwarber
Astros - Bregman, Alvarez, Tucker, Altuve, Verlander
Rangers - Semien, Seager, Scherzer, Carter, Garcia
The top 3 for the Jays, Vlad, Bo, Chapman all were lower wOBA vs xwOBA by 10+ points, then Belt was over by 32 points. Springer down 12, Biggio dead on, Jansen up 19, Kirk down 9, Varsho down 10, Kiermaier up 19, Merrifield up 30. Can't say it was speed given Varsho down and Jansen & Belt up so it seems more random chance. Lots of big variances of 10+ points.
2022 for comparison saw Teoscar & Kirk down 3 & 4, Vlad up 4, Springer up 10, Chapman down 10, Bo up 13, Gurriel up 6, Espinal up 7, Tapia up 3, Biggio up 14. Just 3 guys off by 10+, none by 15.
So for 2024 what do I expect? I expect guys to be closer to their norms. To perform at the expected levels not way off - random means just that, random. Vlad's year should've been between his 2021 'wow' and 2022 'nice' not a flop. Kirk by any measure was a flop, but should've been a bit less of one (I suspect like most his late spring screwed up a lot). Guess we'll see in a few months and a year from now hopefully we'll all be happy watching the Jays tie our guts into knots during the playoffs.