This morning I have seen shots of Vladdy taking BP. I saw Bo and Santiago Espinal arriving. And reportedly Jose Berrios now is blond.
Its also a beautiful spring like day in Southern Ontario, definitely a day to think of spring.
This morning I have seen shots of Vladdy taking BP. I saw Bo and Santiago Espinal arriving. And reportedly Jose Berrios now is blond.
Its also a beautiful spring like day in Southern Ontario, definitely a day to think of spring.
And welcome back, mylegacy.
A bit early yet for a single malt toast to you, but I'll do it virtually for now.
For starting pitchers, Roger Clemens would have to be the ace of the staff -- that signing is still a head-scratcher. In the bullpen, maybe Randy Myers?
In answer to the question, they shoot horses, don't they?, Blue Jays management has seemingly long been of the mind to desperately stave off much needed visits to the glue factory.
"When thinking back on mistakes he’s made, Neyer recalls a long-ago postseason game in which “Tim McCarver was raving about pitch framing and how important it is.” McCarver, who caught in the major leagues for 21 seasons before becoming an announcer, talked at great length about how a catcher could receive the ball in such a way—catching the ball in front of his body, making sure not to jerk his glove—as to influence an umpire’s ball and strike calls. Neyer says he “wrote a typically arrogant column mocking the notion that major-league umpires could be fooled by a catcher,” citing his own experience as an unfoolable Little League ump. (This column, it seems, got lost in some long-ago ESPN.com redesign.) Neyer wasn’t alone in pooh-poohing McCarver’s hobbyhorse. In 1999, Baseball Prospectus’ Keith Woolner did a convincing-seeming study showing that catchers had no influence whatsoever on a pitcher’s performance.
Nine years later, a writer named Dan Turkenkopf found what Woolner couldn’t. Turkenkopf, Max Marchi, Mike Fast, and other pitch-framing researchers of recent vintage have the benefit of Pitch f/x, a high-tech camera system introduced in major-league ballparks starting in 2006 that captured pitch speed, movement, and location with great precision. Armed with better data than Woolner and Neyer had at their disposal, sabermetricians found that the best pitch framer in baseball could save his team roughly half a run per 100 pitches while the worst would cost his team about half a run. As Lindbergh explained in Grantland, that’s an enormous difference: “For comparative purposes, Barry Bonds’s bat during the 2001-2004 seasons, when he basically broke baseball, was worth about 0.78 runs above average per game.”
McCarver was probably the key player in the 1964 World Series. Bob Gibson won the MVP by going 2-1 with a 3.00 ERA that year. McCarver hit .478/.552/.739 including a game-winning 3 run homer in the 10th inning of the 5th game, and produced the most WPA of anyone in the series. He had 103 post-season at-bats overall, going .273/.359/.432 with a 13/9 W/K. This was much better than his in-season line and in the context of the 1960s awfully impressive.
Fine, fine player.
Tim McCarver 2.82I suppose that explains things a little. But it was mostly Bateman (1.60 ERA) in Carlton's ridiculous 1972 season.
Bo Diaz 3.09
Bob Boone 3.22
Ted Simmons 3.24
Ozzie Virgil 3.36
Joe Torre 4.28
He is a LH batter who hit .154 vs LHP last year. I think the desire is to have a RH hitting OF to provide some platoon benefits vs LHP
It warmed my heart to see 97-year old Dick Van Dyke on The Masked Singer this week.
Hernandez 490
Gurriel 429
Tapia 416
Springer 393
Zimmer 96
Bradley 80
Merrifield 60
Biggio 30
Capra 4
Moreno 2