I guess the same thing can be said about baseball.
There were choices made.
For now, all I can say is "Go Leafs Go" and hopefully management will smarten up in the offseason.
- both Manoah and Schneider were jumpy, leading to some bad decisions; they both get passes from me due to inexperience
- some of the run prevention issues that plagued the club during the season bit them again during the playoffs
- the offense was very good, but not quite as good as I expected; adaptation to the lower run-scoring environment was a challenge during the season and we saw evidence of it again Game 1
- they were the better club of the two, but would not have been facing the Astros. That isn't good enough.
I don't draw any particular lessons from the post-season, save for those visible already from the season.
- on the run prevention side, the pitching was a disappointment despite Manoah, Gausman and Stripling being excellent, and the bullpen being absolutely fine (I don't agree with the criticisms here and attribute the post-season collapse in Game 2 to Schneider's uncharacteristically bad decisions). The #4-#7 starters were terrible and that is on the FO and Pete Walker.
- the positioning of both infield and outfield was overdone, and I think that it didn't help the confidence of pitchers who were struggling. Kikuchi and White are both better than they showed
- Pete Walker didn't have a good year, for whatever reason. You would have thought that he might have been a moderating influence on Schneider during the post-season but he wasn't. And of course, he bears some responsibility for the underperformance of the staff this year (as he received credit when they had better years previously)
- on offense, there's a fine line between confidence/swagger and arrogance. Arrogance doesn't help and prevents necessary adaptation to changed circumstances. Alejandro Kirk and Danny Jansen are examples of players on the right side of the line. Not everyone needs to be able to bunt and hit-and-run, but more players do. If you stop learning, you stagnate.
- and yes, they do need an effective left-handed bat in the lineup and Raimel Tapia is not that; Addison Barger might be one but the club should get somebody in the off-season (there's no harm in having Barger, Biggio and a left-handed hitting outfielder who can hit on your roster)
There were choices made."
It's not bad luck. It's reality when you have an offence built around big game duds like Vladdy who don't deliver.
Mike,the Jays need to aim higher. This team needs a LHB good enough to hit top 4 in the line up. Nimmo would be at the bottom of a list of LHH if I was GM.
8 players should be removed to bring it to 35 IMO. Zimmer, JBJ, Phelps and Lawrence are 4 that are probably removed. There are many that have questionable value because they are no longer prospects IMO and should be easily replaceable by similar players that don't need a 40 man spot.
What can Hatch, Kay and Thornton do? Keep 1 RH & 1 LH. M White & T Saucedo can stay because they have had some recent success in mop up roles. Ryu goes back on the 60 day IP when he can (ST I suppose).
Zulueta & Barger could be ready for a promotion after some time in AAA. Barger seems to be way ahead of all the other impact position players. I also add Orelvis and Gabriel Martinez. Orvelis had his well documented issues. Gabriel dominated A & A+ so he should get to AA soon. But both Martinez prospects cannot hit at the ML level now so would they really be picked in the rule 5 draft?
Maybe new rules will bring the fun back. We’ll see.
Some would say, if you're already one of the best, that's the area to focus on so it becomes the clear #1. I.e. Adding an elite hitter in place of Tapia (since Gurriel / Hernandez / Springer seem to get hurt for significant stretches every year) would make this a longer-sequence offense that could easily score 50-100 more runs.
But that's if there are no glaring holes on the pitching side, and we have those too.
Watch what Houston does to Castillo next week with their LHH and you will see what Toronto is missing. If the Jays can’t get someone like Tucker or Alvarez then there isn’t much point.
As for the quick flameout in the wild card round, count me amongst those who prefer my teams to get eliminated in this manner. As a born and raised Vancouver Canucks fan I've had the misfortune of following three long playoff runs in my time that ended in the Stanley Cup finals. Losing in game 7 of the finals like 1994 and 2010 hurts like a sonofabitch and is especially disheartening, in case any Leafs fans around here were curious. Give me two in the head instead of the potentially 10 in the chest (max number of losses the new MLB playoff format offers a team in a single postseason).
As for the manager, despite the follies yesterday I fully expect the interim label to be removed and John Schneider to be back in charge next season with a slightly reworked staff. Dude just looks like a manager out there and seems to command the respect of the team, many of whom grew up in the system with him. Wouldn't be great optics and probably have more than a few pissed players if he was let go after dedicating 20 years to the organization.
There's got to be some roster churn this offseason - I suspect it will be more minor than major, and accompany another modest bump in the payroll. If Moreno can be turned into a lefty power-hitting CF or a front line starter who can consistently throw triple digits, I'd be okay with trading him and ending the three catcher experiment. Otherwise, keep all of them and use Moreno as a super-utility C/3B/LF/2B. Not the worst way to break him in to the majors gently, my dream is he'll become a sort of Tony Phillips v2.0 that also plays catcher. I liked the versatility of lots of the Jays this year, just wish that instead of JBJ, Zimmer and Tapia we had Aaron Judge out there hitting 62. That would have made all the difference this season in my mind (or at least my daydreams).
I too am looking forward to the onset of the pitch clock, limiting shifts and the promise of faster games. I don't know how it'll all shake out at the start with the limits on throws to first and stepping out of the box, probably lots of automatic balls and strikes getting added to counts in April. I like the thought of stolen bases returning to prominence in the game too. It will at least limit my judicious use of the 30 second skip button while watching the games this year, Kikuchi for one sure seemed to drag innings out on the mound when he was a starter. If Stripling has pitched his last game in blue, the thing I'll miss most is his efficiency. More Mark Buehrle clones please!
For 2023 I'm looking forward to seeing the new renovations at the Skydome. I still feel Rogers is a terrible owner and I've found their handling of the TV rights has been especially irksome over the years. From petty things like SN1 debuting midseason years ago, to never properly reimbursing the team in their corporate accounting shell game, a team owned by an individual rather than a business just wouldn't have to go thru these same hoops. If we have the richest owners with the highest TV viewership of any team (on a network with the same owner), there's no reason we can't spend like the Mets, Dodgers and Yankees.
Bring on spring training! Until then I'll have the Jays in 30 on my PVR of that one Friday evening post-ASG when the most magical beatdown went down in Beantown. That's how I prefer to remember the Jays 2022 season.
I think this team does need to mature a little with their play on the field -- pitching discipline chief among them. But I will note that the defense from Vlad and a few of the other young turks actually got better. So let's hope for a similar step forward on the pitch selection side. It seems possible and in Vlad's case was actually a big feature of his game last year.
Aside from that in the offseason -- we need starters -- really really good starters; middle of the pack starters; spot starters; #4 or 5 level starters. Atkins, get us more starters! The bullpen will be a lot better once we have great starters -- and the hitting and defense only needs to mature more. And like the rest of us the team will be exactly one year older this time next year. That should do the job.
Indeed. Mind you, the older one gets - and I'm really old - the easier it is to let it go and move on. By midnight, I was done with baseball and getting ready for the Japanese Grand Prix. And the Leafs start their season on Wednesday, and if I can look forward to that I have obviously reached a state of equanimity that the rest of you can only envy.
It was not always thus. I was about the same age as Eephus back in October 1987, although I was somewhat distracted by developments on the home front at that very moment. But I surely do remember 1985. I don't remember anger, just a sort of numb, shell-shocked disbelief. We're not going to the World Series? Why? Why?
Say this for Anthopoulos- he did pretty well last year at the deadline too.
The Leafs lost my interest a long time ago. But baseball, well it's going strong in the 7th decade and I don't think that's going to change.
To tell you the truth, hockey lost my interest a long time ago, the game itself, completely. It's only come back these last few years. An exciting hometown team probably helped. But it was also the one sport I was actually fairly good at in my youth, and it pleases me that I can enjoy it again.
A few years ago watching the Raptors win it all with my teen daughter was fantastic fun. She now is captain of her high school team, was the star shortstop on her softball team, and will be playing center on her hockey team in a few weeks. Sports are tons of fun, but I'm far more into her games than the Jays or any other pro sports. FYI: my Dad was a great athlete in his day and still can break par in golf at 88. Sadly I have none of that, only sport I did well in was bowling.
5 years: 84% chance of not winning
10 years: 71%
25 years: 43%
50 years: 18%
75 years: 8%
100 years: 3% (1 team likely to have that long a break without winning)
150 years: 1%
So basically odds are someone will have a WS drought like the Cubs had from 1908 to 2016. Lets hope it isn't the Jays.
AA took a big chance twice. First time he failed miserably and 2nd time it worked. He didn’t get respect from everyone until he went to Atlanta, took a really good team and made them better. This season he’s even more impressive because he lost his best or 3nd best player and has been able to adjust.
Shapiro has had a ton of success and came to Toronto as one of the most respected in the game. They’re both at a point now where they are highly respected but so far since the GM change you have to say AA has delivered and done the better job, imho only because he has performed very well in the last 12 months while Shapiro’s team has struggled to make or excel in the playoffs.
Atkin's first was 2016 with Bo Bichette (13), Cavan Biggio (6), and Zach Jackson (1) - nice start, 2017 a total flop (none got 1 WAR), 2018 a flop so far (I like Vinny Capra, 301/395/455 this year as a SS/3B with his first call up for 7 PA). Jordan Groshans getting his shot elsewhere, but this group is just now needing to be put on the 40 man so at this point anything they've produced is bonus. Same for 2019 where Alek Manoah is the only one to reach (and wow at 9 WAR). 2020 hasn't had any reach but Austin Martin was useful getting Berrios even if he looks like a flop now (sub 700 OPS, counting a lot on HBP). Nick Frasso was part of the White trade (ouch right now), Trent Palmer is promising, CJ Van Eyk hasn't shown anything yet (surgery), Zach Britton has shown some promise but is a long ways from being useful (238/383/444 between A+/AA). 2021 has a potential star in Ricky Tiedemann but we're aways away from knowing the results of that draft, or of 2022's.
Overall I have no problem with Atkin's drafts. Bo, Biggio, and Manoah are 3 pretty nice gets, and just his first 2-3 drafts are really able to be judged imo at this point. If Tiedemann is a star then he has gotten all I ask for - 1 star every 2-3 years, 1 or 2 regulars a year. You do that and you've been very successful. Compare to Ricciardi's nightmares (Hill, Lind, Marcum, Romano, Gomes is about it for his impact players and he had a few top 10 picks iirc) or Ash's post first round drafts (for years he had great first picks and nothing else outside of dumb luck with Orlando Hudson).
AA's team is better this year because Strider was in the CY conversation as a 2020 4th rounder (ie. a guy he and his people drafted); and Harris is a 2019 3rd rounds (same story). also worth recalling that the previous GM's malfeasance hampered AA's ability to sign international picks (another thing he did well here).
after his first year, AA's teams increased attendance (and attention and excitement) for the team to levels not seen since before the strike. as i indicate elsewhere, i don't have a fundamental problem with the current FO - i think i understand how and why they do what they do. with the changes in the league, it has a better chance of working than in the past when the team has taken similar paths. it could be worse, but it could also be better. i think AA is (and was) a top 5 GM in baseball, i merely think Shapiro and Atkins are a tier or two below that.
so, i'm not calling for them to be fired or heaping scorn on them - in fact, i think the jays are well-positioned to continue to perform at or around this level for the next 2-3 years without doing much.
on the other hand, AA has had a division winner every year he's been in a FO since 2015. The team he inherited won 72 games the year before he helmed it to the division, but it's hard to call the 'his' team; however, I think the last 3 years that criticism can't be levelled and he's shown that he is versatile and not merely a risk/reward guy or that he had "emptied the cupboard" here in 2015. also, his teams are doing this in what in what is probably the second (or third at worst) toughest division.
Success in the AL East used to be very hard because of NYY and Boston. Then TB showed up.
IMO the Jays will never outspend NYY/Boston or out cheap TB. Certainly not on a regular basis. In 2019 our playing roster may have been cheaper than TB's. In 2020/21 our payroll was probably higher than Boston.
AA got ownership to increase payroll in 2013 which was good. Except paying extra for players on long term contracts can cripple a team like the Jays in parts of that contract. For example Tulo, Martin and Ryu (Shapiro/Atkins). AA may have learned because the long term contracts to young Acuna and a couple other young players were team friendly. C Morton is getting payed a lot (highest pay of his career), but it is not really very long. Atlanta has had injuries to good but inexpensive pitchers like I Anderson and M Sokora. AA is dealing well with that acquiring Iglesias but no WS championship yet this year. IMO AA has learned how to manage a good (Atlanta) budget. IMO NYM & Philadelphia will outspend Atlanta and soon Washington may as well.
Shapiro was very experienced when he got here. He took the successful 2015 AA team and had good 2016 results. Not so good in 2017 and worse in 2018 when the decision was made to rebuild at the trade deadline.
Shapiro is getting a good budget now and the spending is his responsibility. His budget history is 2019 cheap playing roster, more expensive in 2020, Ryu, Roark, C Anderson. And more expensive in 2021 with Springer (long term) and Semen short term. The 2022 expensive long term commitment to Gausman did not hurt this year. 2022 had 3 $20+mil players. Will 2023 get more expensive? For sure if Arb is expensive.
The GMs in KC, Texas and Detroit were fired this year due to failure and a very long rebuild. Not much revenue if the team loses and more revenue if the team wins. The LAA GM fired the year before because of failure.
Shapiro/Atkins & probably AA know spending/revenue and wins/losses are related.
Sorry if anyone expects wisdom from me!! This kid has dreams and ambitions but was humble.
Being more interested in the advanced group, I was wondering who made the "most outstanding" advancement and what it could mean. I am not talking about moving from #20 to #5 OR making the top 100 list.
A good example is Tiedemann because he dominated 3 levels. Barger was similar. Both made fantastic advancements.
I want to bring Max Castillo into the discussion. He just turned 23 in May. Has played 7 seasons in our system, not counting 2020. In 2021 102 IP in AA which were decent but not dominating. In 2022 29 IP AA where he mastered/dominated. Then blew through AAA and got promoted to the Jays and did quite well IMO. I am sure this is not a trajectory that is common but could be a guideline. His stuff is not overpowering but was good enough in the Majors for a nice role on a pitching staff. However he was terrible for KC in AAA and the majors. More ML experience and an uptick in velo is probably needed. And what ever else.
Tiedemann and Zulueta do have dominant stuff so their ceiling should be higher than Max. The quality of their 2023 minor league performance will determine how they rise.
I believe that getting to the majors fast or at a young age is a sign that the player is probably good. For example Bobby Whitt Jr was up at age 21 (HS draft) with just 1 full minor league season. Manoah (college pick) was older when he got to the majors never had a full minor league season. Both players qualify as very fast to the majors IMO.
I have a list of fast candidates. That list is weird. For example Brian Baggett 20IP but has progressed only to Dunedin. 27 next year makes him old for every league in the minors.