FYI: if MLB went by a 16 team playoff, winners of each division gets in, then next 5 as wild cards, then the playoffs would be set outside of seeding. Jays, Yankees, Red Sox, Seattle, and Oakland all in. All sub 500 teams out. Using last years top 2 in all divisions plus 2 wild cards would have us worrying a LOT about Boston but having a shot at the AL East #2 slot (Tampa/NYY (Boston/Toronto), ChiSox/Cleveland (2 up on Detroit, 6 on KC), Houston/Seattle (2 up on Oakland)). Using the old single wild card this would be just as big a series but we'd need to hope Boston loses at least one more than the Jays from here on out. The 1969-1993 method (2 per league) would have Houston and the ChiSox fighting hard for the AL West (assuming the Astros still switched leagues). The pre 1969 method of just 1 per league would have Tampa clinching last night when Houston lost to Oakland.
The NL pre-69 through 1993 would have a wild battle between LA and SF as only one would get in. The 1969-1993 method would have Milwaukee in as well (assuming they would be in the East, if not then St Louis would be 3 1/2 up on Atlanta). The single wild card would have everything set outside of the NL East (Atlanta/Philly as it is right now). The 2020 method would have Atlanta/Philly, Milwaukee/St Louis, SF/LAD all in plus 2 wild cards - Cincinnati and San Diego.
Each method would've had some kind of race still going. Plus, of course, teams would've acted differently in July had there been 2-4-8-10-16 teams going to the playoffs.
This is a jays-career-defining start for him.
No matter how you cut it though I'd say this is as strong a lineup as possible right now outside of having Kirk behind the plate but Jansen has been hitting better than Kirk lately (588 OPS vs 195 over the past 2 weeks) not that either has hit worth a darn. Lets hope the teams has a big game tonight - they need it.
- Can Ryu deliver a solid outing, mixing location and speed and also staying away from the middle of the plate?
- In a high-adrenaline game, can the Jays hitters be aggressive without being too aggressive (swinging early at pitches out of the zone)?
- Can the bottom of the Jays order contribute? It will be a good sign if Jansen stays hot.
They’ve mostly played the Yankees well so that should help the team’s confidence. Win or lose, it’s late September exciting baseball
Thankfully....Clutcherson.
Come on Ryu get rizzo please.
Cimber save us.
But he shouldn't have let Gio get on.
But the Orioles have taken the lead.
Please take advantage.
Just an amazing swing by Stanton to hit that changeup out of the park
— Chris Black (@DownToBlack) September 29, 2021
How unlikely was it?
Trevor Richards had thrown 917 changeups down & out of the zone in his MLB career before tonight and none (!!!) had ever been hit for a HR.
Crazy & unbelievable hit. pic.twitter.com/HiCN15EX2n
Time for ours to.
This game shouldn't be over.
Might be time for an upgrade there, Ross.
The strike zone to RH batters does seem to extend some six inches off the plate. Richards got a called strike in the Stanton at bat that was just silly.
In the bigger picture, this is all gravy for me. An exciting September is always great, more so when a product of a season founded on good fortune.
Catcher framing is almost extinct these days: what used to be a 3-4 win skill is worth ~+/- 1 win these days. https://t.co/E5vJlpPTNM pic.twitter.com/rjht4k9x8O
— Rob Arthur (@No_Little_Plans) September 28, 2021
Yankees bullpen is looking formidable and a good reminder to management to nix the “fungible reliever” nonsense and put some money in the pen. Our top 4 guys are generally good, but in today’s game you need more.
Yes, Giancarlo Stanton's HR was ridiculous, so was Anthony Rizzo's single.
— Chris Black (@DownToBlack) September 29, 2021
Hyun Jin Ryu has thrown 801 pitches low (<1.2ft) & off the plate in his MLB career, and Rizzo's single last night was just the 2nd hit he had ever given up on one of those pitches (.026 avg) pic.twitter.com/ilLtwFWYt1
The Yankees shut the Jays down with
a) Michael King, a middling prospect witha 7.76 ERA in his 27-inning 2020 season, putting it together a bit this year at age 26 as a low-leverage reliever.
b) Clay Holmes, a Pittsburgh reject (Pittsburgh!) with a 5.57 ERA in 120 innings as a Pirate, who has magically turned into an ace reliever in his 25 Yankee innings.
c) Chad Green, a longtime middle reliever originally acquired as a 24-year-old starter stalled out in AA.
d) Luis Severino, a good starter in 2017 and 2018 coming back now in the bullpen after missing nearly 3 years due to injury.
e) Wandy Peralta, a fungible middle reliever with a 4.69 ERA in 184 IP prior to 2021.
These 5 are not a case study in why a team should spend big bucks on relievers.
For 2021 the pen was bad and Atkins again went the trade route for Cimber, Soria and Richards. Soria has not been helpful. Cimber and Richards doubled the reliable relievers in the pen. Adding to Romano and Mayza. Again the players given up were not that much.
For 2022 Atkins has said he will strengthen the pen. He has not said how. I expect that by mid season or earlier we will be able to evaluate the 2022 pen. Good contributions from our large collection of young pitchers will be crucial I believe. That seems to be our biggest lack of success area. Going to weak teams to pick up their good relievers is a strategy that we hopefully will not have to do again out of necessity.
If the Jays miss the playoffs/tiebreaker, and Montoyo is still around in 2022, then it would be a bad look for the FO, IMO. If you can cut bait on underperforming talent that make real money (ex. Roark), then the manager is a much easier decision to make. Of course, if the Jays win out the rest of the season and head into a WC game, then he might actually get extended, which is both exciting and terrifying.
Doesn't the manager get any credit for practically every important thing going right? At the very least I think he should get some credit for the rotation health, Vladdy's emergence, and cobbling together a competent bullpen out of many arms with very little track record. Of course none of these things happened because of Montoyo alone, but I don't take for granted that any manager would have overseen these same results.
They acquired Rizzo, Gallo and Stinky but these guys were not the difference makers yesterday.
That was Judge and Stanton who have made adjustments to how the Jays are pitching them.
Two MVP candidates who rebounded from disappointing seasons, and a Cy Young candidate who learned how to throw strikes for the first time in his career. Plus a rookie of the year candidate who pitched all of 35 minor league innings, and a rotation that was pretty healthy for most of the year.
Typically, managers get credit for stuff like that happening.
I'm sure there's an explanation for this one somewhere.
The pen has been juggles in frustrating ways at times, but remember the closer was IL'ed pre-season (Yates), the #1 setup man only got 10 1/3 iP (Phelps), the replacement closer got 2 saves then IL'ed as well (Merryweather), last years closer fell apart (Dolis), Chatwood was a solid setup for a stretch then forgot where the strikezone was and was released, Borucki was to be a key piece but was IL'ed most of the year and lately has flip flopped between AAA/majors, Hand was traded for but pitched about as well as I would. I think Montoya did a solid job juggling what he had. Giving kids a shot and if they blew it they were dumped. Same for vets (but with more rope as Chatwood got far more than he should've).
If you want to argue that Montoyo helped get the younger players adjusted to the big leagues, maybe that's true. The clubhouse certainly appears to be very well run with no issues. But that's not the reason every SP stayed healthy (for the most part), or why every important non-Springer position player was able to stay healthy/play everyday, etc. That's quite a bit of luck on the Jays side. The fact that they have underachieved as much as they have, combined with endless amounts of questionable lineup/bullpen decisions, is a pretty big indictment on the manager.
Case in point, a loss tonight and the Jays are pretty much done. Yet, Reese McGuire starts at catcher. This is the type of stuff Montoyo has done all season.
The idea of firing Charlie is silly. I hate the bunting, I don't like a lot of in game stuff but by far the most important job a manager has is team cohesion and attitude and he's done a fantastic job there.
A manager that doesn't know who his best players are, bunts with 2 strikes, doesn't understand bullpen leverage, etc, should not be managing a team with playoff aspirations. His best qualities are actually best positioned with a rebuilding team because wins/losses don't matter. It's not 2019 anymore. It's not silly at all to replace him. It would be silly to keep him if the hope is to legitimately contend.
Springer is not 100%. Neither is Gurriel.
Having to DH Gurriel is not ideal.
Jansen is 1 for 3 against Cole and McGuire is 0 for 3.
Kirk is 3 for 6 with a homerun, but they need Kirk fresh tomorrow.
Besides, Kirk is slumping as well.
The one thing I don't like is bringing Cimber with runners in scoring position.
That's a waste of his skills which is producing ground balls.
Would have been nice to have a guy who can strand runners.
Hand and Soria have not delivered.
In a game in which you never have more than a 1 run lead, with runners on every innings, it's all high leverage.
It would have been a disaster if they had used the top relievers yesterday to make it a 3-2 loss.
Those Twins losses really hurt now and that was all a due to lack of offense.
It surely would, and Cimber, Mayza, Romano are all available tonight because the team got some good work from Pearson and Merryweather.
Cimber and Richards have done a fine job since coming here but both have characteristics that make neither one all that ideal if there are already runners on base. Richards doesn't give up very many hits at all, but the ones he does allow tend to leave the yard. It's usually a clean escape but it can be a disaster. It's almost impossible to go deep against Cimber, but he strikes out significantly fewer hitters than the average pitcher. He will give up contact, and sometimes contact is all it takes.
Insurance runs would be a good idea.
Up to the bullpen now.
Dickerson throwing? Never going to be close.
Dickerson throwing? Never going to be close.
Fair enough--I guess I was just hoping they could keep the lead. It's a 2-inning game now--Still going to hold out that hope.
Blinked and I missed it.
Absolutely not. Why is one worried about Judge and Stanton? Because they hit home runs. Which major league pitcher gives up the fewest home runs? Adam Cimber.
Romano A+
Berrios A+
Semien A+
Bo A+ (and a special award for sheer awesomeness)
Team effort A+
Winning is the main thing, of course, but something I never thought of, until it was mentioned post game, is that the 5 runs earned for Cole hurts his Cy Young hopes and a great outing by Ray tomorrow might clench it for him.
Boy, Vlad is ice cold at the plate. We really need him to break out.
Cimber was excellent. I thought he was pulled too soon yesterday, but it kept him available today and that was crucial.
If Berrios is pitching, McGuire is catching. It's like Ray and Kirk.
Game 163: This would be much like yesterday in terms of the roster and it being a must-win game. I hope you're wrong about it automatically being McGuire at catcher, I'd go with Jansen.
Game 1, Division Series: Rosters will be down to 26 from the current 28. Does McGuire make the cut?
Game 2, 2022: I'll be surprised and dismayed if McGuire is still a Blue Jay.
While long-term you want (or need) your pitchers to be able to throw to all the catchers on your roster, at this point in the season, I think it's reasonable to defer to your pitcher's preferences if it's a front-end pitcher and you think it might impact their comfort level. Even if it's psychological and not necessarily born out in the results, if it results in Ray or Berrios specifically feeling better I'd be willing to defer to that.
I think this is a judgement call, so I understand people disagree, but my priority for last night's game would be placing Berrios in the best position within reason to pitch well.
That, and they watch the games. And they probably also figure that right now isn't the best time to experiment. Let's stick with what's been working, for the next few days at least.
I think the trade was more about Miami unloading Dickerson's contract rather than an intended fair exchange of equally skilled players.
Here's the tweet from the Jays account announcing the trade:
https://bit.ly/3zTAqSo
Shi Davidi reported that the net increase to the Jays payroll was only $1M:
https://www.sportsnet.ca/mlb/article/report-blue-jays-acquire-dickerson-cimber-marlins-panik-prospect/
Mayza bounced the pitch in the dirt right at home plate on the inner half and McGuire used his body to get over the ball, but it nevertheless bounced away. It's silly to call that a "mistake" on McGuire's part.
If that's so then I stand corrected. Thank you. Then yes indeed, it is fair game to mock the Marlins on this one.
The Jays went 8-2 in Kirk's starts in September and are 11-3 in his last 14 starts.
As for what I called McGuire's "game changing mistake" in the heat of the moment...maybe I was being harsh but at the same time when you know Mayza is going to bury a slider to try for the strikeout you simply have to block that pitch in that scenario if you're a catcher who is in there for defense, imo.
Blue Jays - 8 K, 0 BB, 3 HR
Failing to corral a wild pitch? Whatever. That happens to all catchers once in a while, and Mayza’s was not a simple one to block.
Fundamentally, McGuire did his job and contributed to the win.
But was he Mayza's choice?
And even if we do accept that as a fact, McGuire's job should have ended when Berrios was pulled from the game and the C spot came up with a runner on base in a two-run game. That's the real issue here, having a 6-man bench and not deploying those resources. If that wasn't a spot for Biggio, what's he doing with the big club?
A funny part of that particular play was that Voit, the batter, ran hard to first even though he was automatically out and then limped off the field as he obviously has some issues with his knee. Bichette did that in a game not long ago and got called out on it on here. I think it's just a major leaguer's instinct to run to first in this situation and even they forget the rules sometimes.
I think a more likely explanation is that Montoyo just wants to play McGuire instead of having him rot on the bench, so he starts him periodically, and maybe likes something about the dynamic between Berrios and Reese. I'm not sure, but either way, I don't think every SP on the team has requested a personal catcher all of a sudden.
Pitchers don't usually ask for specific catchers unless their names are Clemens or Maddux.
It will be interesting to see what Montoyo does tonight. Kluber has been tougher on lefties this year, but Dickerson is 5/14 against him. Does Grichuk get the start in RF with Ray and his fly-ball tendencies on the bump? Maybe Gurriel, who is 0/8 since coming back from injury, will sit and Dickerson will DH.
Nor do I - I don't think Ray asks for Kirk or Berrios asks for McGuire. I think Montoyo and Walker have simply been paying attention to how it's gone so far, and have acted accordingly.
I actually wish Matz would say "Anyone but Jansen." Probably not going to happen.
Probably. Kirk's been pinch hit for 3 times this season (twice in April, and once against Detroit). He's been replaced by a pinch runner at least 7 times (I was only looking at games where he was the starting catcher.)
Jansen's been pinch hit for 6 times, McGuire 14 times. McGuire's also been replaced by a pinch runner 3 times.
Cot's contracts on BP lists this on Dickerson's entry
acquired by Toronto in trade from Miami 6/29/21 with $4,432,796 remaining on contract (as part of the deal, Marlins paid Blue Jays about $2.65M in cash)
They suggest the Jays are paying about 1.8 million of Dickerson's pro-rated contract, or less than 40%.
- Jansen is always with Ryu (3.92 ERA vs 5.17 with McGuire, Kirk hasn't caught him).
- McGuire with Berrios (3.04 ERA vs 3.6 with Jansen, 12 with Kirk).
- Ray with Kirk (2.20 ERA vs 3.72 Jansen, 2.93 McGuire).
- Manoah has been a mix and match - 10 with McGuire (3.65 ERA), 7 with Kirk (2.86) and 2 with Jansen (3.97).
- Matz is mostly Jansen (14 games 4.92 ERA) but also a lot with McGuire (10 games 2.64 ERA), and a few with Kirk (5 games 2.05 ERA).
But...but... but... he's got the highest batting average!
Jansen is the only one swinging a half decent bat at the moment and he's a better defender than Kirk. I expect he'll get the Ryu start, and probably Matz as well. (Me, I'd rather see Jansen get Manoah and have Kirk catch Matz.)
Fun obsessing over who's hitting ninth, no?
Springer (18 PA) 860
Semien (26 PA) 711
Vladdy (6 PA) 2333
Bichette (7 PA) 1286
Hernandez (4 PA) 250
Dickerson (15 PA) 900
Kirk (2 PA) 2500
Espinal (0 PA) ---
Grichuk (6 PA) 333
Lourdes is 1/5 against him (OPS 400).
That would have been the first team EVER with 6 100+ RBI men. '36 Yankees had 5, and that's it. 4 has been done maybe 10-20 times, 5 once, never 6.
Might not have made for the best overall W-L record (Spring has been a huge boost at times!), but might have set a new record that would be hard-pressed to be beaten for many years to come..
The Jays badly need Teoscar and Vladdy to heat up. It would help if Kirk regained his hitting mojo, too.
Top of the Yankees order coming up in the 6th. Huge action inning for Ray coming up.
Would be nice if the boys gave him a cushion heading in tho.
Orioles just went up 5-1 too.
Time we had some luck.
Improbably, the Jays still have a chance to win the WC2 spot, although they would have to pass or tie both Seattle and Boston in the next three games, for example, by sweeping the O’s while Seattle and Boston win only one or two games of their final series.
I guess the long fade out continues through the weekend barring an incredible miracle.
WC2 is still possible but not looking good. This is going to be a long winter because this team was legitimately good enough to make the playoffs this season.
The big question is rotation - set right now are Berrios/Ryu/Manoah/Stripling with the 5th slot wide open for Thornton/Kay (lets hope not), Hatch/Pearson (Jays want one of them at least there), and whatever AAAA guys they sign for AAA who gets a shot in spring to impress. Plus other prospects of course. So Ray or Matz would be nice (then Stripling will be fighting with the kids for the 5th slot) but not critical. Ryu scares me a bit with his collapse for the 2nd year in a row at the end.
OK, other is 2B/3B - Semien would be nice but very expensive ($120 for 3? Maybe). Biggio/Espinal are both nice backups but not ideal as everyday guys. Valera - heck no. Smith? He'll get a shot. Otto Lopez will be given a shot too, as will Samad Taylor I figure. Jordan Groshans is a guy the Jays have high hopes for - over the last 90 days (41 games, July 3rd to end of AA season) he hit 324/404/472 which is a very good sign.
Hrm. Need to stop thinking about 2022 when we have 3 more games left. Weirder things have happened - if the Jays win all 3, and the O's and Mariners win 2 of 3, while the Yankees lose all 3 vs the Rays we get a 4 way tie which would be lots of fun/tension. It could happen. Not often you have that possible with 3 games to go. Jays go 2-1, O's 1-2, Seattle 1-2 3 way tie, Jays 1-2 then we need O's and Mariners to lose all 3 this weekend which lands under very unlikely but possible. So no matter what the Jays will still be alive on Saturday and it won't take much for Sunday to matter. Nice change from 2017/18/19 and 1994-2014. Painful with losses like todays but this sure beats all of those seasons even though they had Halladay and/or Delgado quite often on the team, or Rocket Roger (dang was that fun watching him beat the Red Sox and have a year for the ages in '97). Nothing as fun as a real pennant race outside of being in the playoffs of course. And this team is built to do this again next year even if we lose all 3 big Free Agents.
I was totally against Kevin Cash taking Blake Snell out of the game in the World Series last year, even though he was cruising, to avoid the third time through the order. Maybe it is the right move in certain situations though. Imagine the howling if Montoya had done that last night, but could the bullpen have held the lead? It's easy to play the game in retrospect but I was thinking," Get him out of there, Charlie!" after Ray gave up the two home runs and then a walk.
Two things, though:
1. the season isn’t over yet
2. the Yankees and Red Sox have also had their share of appalling losses this year (for example, think of some of their games against Baltimore and how they lost those games)
he's our best pitcher, no way we could have pulled off what the rays do this year
some reserva exclusiva from diplomatico might be in order
Pinch hitting for Grichuk against a lefty down 4 runs in the 9th but not in the 6th down 3 runs with a runner on base against a righty was typical Montoya managing.
Looking back I see we had expected to see Kay, Borucki, Liriano, Mayza, Castro, Chatwood, Cole, Phelps, and Romano in the pen with Dolis and Yates. 11 guys for 9 slots. Forgot about Liriano - he didn't play for anyone this year. Of those 11 only Mayza and Romano worked well. Borucki, Castro, Kay, and Phelps had moments as did Dolis and Chatwood but most are not around now to help.
So for the final days the Jays now count on Romano, Mayza, Cimber (trade), Richards (trade), Pearson (demoted from rotation due to injuries), Merryweather (no one every counted on him, but he might be good going forward) with Barnes getting the 'break glass if needed' slot (ie: blow out one way or the other).
The Rays have a method to their madness. Some times it fails, most of the time it works, but they don't deviate from it. Most of the players seem to buy in to that, so it works for them. The Jays have a manager who will keep SP's in the game long enough to give up leads because they "earned the right to go deeper into games", or let star players play 162 games rather than give them periodic rest, or use RP's in high leverage spots because they used to be good in the past or he wants to show confidence in them, etc, etc. Those are traits that players will generally respect about a manager, but they don't necessarily mesh with winning games on the field. The key is to strike a balance between keeping the clubhouse happy while also having a manager who knows what he's doing out there. The Jays have a manager who only seems to do one of those things well (and we are just assuming since it's not quantifiable what happens behind closed doors).
It's probably a moot point since I don't expect the Jays to get rid of Charlie, on the contrary I actually expect them to extend him, but hopefully it's something they look into. Montoyo is a fine manager for a rebuilding team, and certainly for a minor league team (probably where he should be), but he's not built for the level the Jays want to be at.
The question is whether you want Ray to face those guys more than most of your relievers.
...and the answer to that question is probably still a resounding yes, even in retrospect.
If anything, the success of Semien and Ray has probably made players notice Toronto as a FA destination. Two players who bet on themselves, took pillow contracts with the Jays despite not knowing where the team was going to play most of their home games, and put up MVP/Cy Young calibre seasons with a young team on the rise.
Even if Ray and Semien sign elsewhere, I think the Jays are a real FA option now even for players looking for pillow contracts, whereas in the past that might have not been the case, especially for SP's. Not sure which FA's fit that bill aside from Syndergaard (not sure any team is giving up a pick for one year of a SP who hasn't pitched in two seasons), but I'm sure an option or two will present itself. I'm not too concerned if the Jays lose Ray, but they'll have to aim higher than re-signing Matz.
Very nice look back John N. I expected more from Springer, the kid pitchers and the pen.
Never expected Manoah, Ray, Semien, Vlad to play as well as they did. Also not expecting 4 100 RBI players. I checked some strong offensive teams for number of 100 RBI players just to see if the 4 for the Jays is special.
Houston 1, NYY 0 so far, CWS 1, Boston 1, LAA 0 so far. SF 0, LAD 0, Milwaukee 0, ST Louis 1 so far.
My conclusion is the Jays win with 4. Very special indeed.
Still they have to score more than 2 runs. I thought all Kluber had some hangers earlier in the game that they couldn’t convert and then he settled in. The yankees on the other hand didn’t seem to miss the gifts they were given.