August 2006 the Jays just finished a great homestead highlighted by winning 3 of 4 against the Yankees (big crowds, walk off homers, the works). It pulled them to within 4.5 games of the division. They proceeded to go out west, lose 2 of 3 to a terrible Mariners team and get swept in Oakland. The margin for error was razor thin in the AL East in those years, but that team never recovered.
August 2015 post trade deadline with Tulo and Price, the Jays went on an epic west coast trip and bludgeoned the Rangers and Angels going 6-1, scoring a ridiculous amount of runs.
Going back previous years, holy crap I forgot they used to make teams play all 3 Pacific time zone teams in one trip. That's insane.
By the way, what song are those lyrics from?
#4 in run differential
#3 in projected rest of season run differential
#3 in projected full season run differential
#6 in baseruns run differential
#5 in full season projected WAR
The Jays embark now on a 9 game road-ish trip through LA, Seattle, and Washington. The first game of tomorrow's doubleheader is a home game in LA (?!), and the M's games always brings out a pro-Jays crowd. This Thursday should be Berrios vs. Ohtani.
I have a Theory of Paul McCartney, although it's closely related to my perhaps minority opinion that by far the most impressive stretch of his solo career begins roughly around 1999.
Eephus put them there? It'll be Radiohead. Count on it.
I would think it preferable to get the west coast swing done in one trip to minimize both travel and jet lag. IMO, the 2019 schedule was insane, especially since the AL East played the NL West.
April 15-21: @ Minn, @ Oak
April 23-28: Home
April 30-May 5: @ LAA, @ Tex
May 6-12: Home
May 14-19: @ SF, @ Chi
3 separate west coast trips within a month. Plus the very next road trip at the end of May took them to Colorado. That still left road games vs the Mariners and Dodgers, but those they did in one trip in August.
I was watching an old Detroit Tigers broadcast from '93 (Skeeter Barnes charged the mound vs Randy Johnson, which was hilarious) and George Kell mentions an 11 game road trip the Tigers were on through California, Seattle, and Oakland. I'm sure it has to do with the differences in scheduling now, though.
Normally, going to the minors sucks, but in this case, there is less travel and Buffalo is a familiar gig.
Unless they are currently on the road.
Mind you, going to Florida in August sucks too.
1. Staying the postseason hunt until the end of the season?
2. Playing in the WC game?
3. Winning the WC game?
4. Making it to the ALCS?
5. Making it to the WS?
6. Winning the WS?
For me it's probably #2, though of course I would like to see #4, 5 or 6 happen.
A lot will still have to go right, but the most realistic best case is WC1. I don't think anyone is catching the Rays for the division. Two of Boston, New York, or Oakland have to fall back while the Jays continue to play to their projected win total. It's going to be difficult, but this 9-2 homestand combined with Boston's regression has changed the picture dramatically in 2 weeks.
Most likely two of Oakland, Boston, NYY, TO are going to get the wildcard. Maybe Tampa gets cold and maybe another team under (LAA?) gets hot, but since chances are pretty even that one of those will happen let's do a probability cancel on that.
TO has the worst record of any of the four.
These are all good teams.
TO does not get a karma badge for their pythagorean offset.
I think TO is the best team here but none of these teams I don't think is going to lose a lot games.
I think getting the wildcard spot is a big victory if it happens and given the hole we're in -- I will consider that a pretty big victory.
Would love to have more.
I'm prepared for a showdown vs NY for the wildcard.
The IL is Soria with a perfect 1 IP, Castro at 84, Mayza at 118. Castro won't replace anyone, but go back to AAA, Mayza for Saucedo, Soria for Murphy I suspect.
This is good enough for me as a successful season because the young core is growing into their competitiveness. They will know what to do in the next few years to succeed.
How we win and lose will show us our weakness.
It's mid August and we won't know until the very end if the season was a success, so it probably is.
Is anyone else hoping the Red Sox sweep the Rays so that the teams can be more closely bunched together?
"hopefully, some live ABs and some games here soon next week"
"probably the best I've felt"
Seeing is believing.
I'd rate this season a success no matter what happens from here in. When you consider losing a potential closer in Yates, then a slew of other bullpen pitchers, plus others that were ineffective, not to mention a rotation that looked shaky for a few months, and playing in 3 different home parks, I think that the Jays did good to be even over .500 at this point.
The positives are many : the trio of Ray, Springer and Semien have been maybe the best free agent signings of the offseason, Vlad Jr. is having a monster season batting and looking great in the field,too. Alek Manoah has pitched very well as a rookie and Ross Stripling has emerged as a reliable starter after tweaking his delivery. Reece McGuire has come back from being DFA-ed in April to being a solid left-handed hitting catcher. The acquisition of Berrios shows that management thinks the team can win and we no longer have to watch Drury and Fisher scuffle along. If you don't produce, you're out as Tanner Roarke and Tyler Chatwood found out.
And, finally, Bo Bichette is having a great season,too. It's hard to believe he's only 22 games over a single full season of major league baseball, not to mention that Vlad Jr. is 32 games short of two full seasons. So, making the playoffs is nice, and winning in them is even better, but a season can still be a success if the team overcomes adversity and grows in a lot of different areas.
My McCartney theory is basically this: he found his true love, he started raising a family with her, and for roughly thirty years his day job simply didn't have his full attention. But Linda died and the kids left the nest....
The Beatles were the best. When I didn't like a song on the radio, I'd change the station. I don't think I ever changed the station for any Beatles song other than maybe Helter Skelter. But when I listen to music, I don't play Beatles. To me, they are like food that I would eat and enjoy if someone else made it, but if I make the food, I would make something else that I really want to eat.
And how mind-bogglingly ambitious they were. Their goals kept getting bigger and bigger until the only thing left was world domination - and that was what they went for. The Rolling Stones, by comparison, were just some humble lads who just wanted to get a foothold in their home town and play some Chicago blues properly.
My thoughts exactly.
My very first personally purchased albums, with saved up birthday money, were the red and blue albums, shortly after they came out. I recently gifted those albums to a Beatles collector friend. I listened to the Beatles a lot growing up in the 1970s. I even had to learn the French version of Maxwell's Silver Hammer in music class in Quebec (yes, it's bad in French too).
I saw the touring production that was Beatlemania in the early 1980s. I have seen the cover band Rain. I have seen Classic Albums Live perform various Beatles albums umpteen times (including the White Album; wonder what Revolution 9 is like "performed" live? strange, very strange). I have seen the Cirque du Soleil show Love, both in its early days and its revamped incarnation a decade later. I watched the very mediocre movie Yesterday and found the scene with non-Beatle John Lennon oddly moving. I recently enjoyed the McCartney 3,2,1 documentary with Rick Rubin. I have enjoyed all of this Beatles consumption immensely. And yet and yet and yet... I do not play Beatles music. I think I will, freshly inspired by whatever I have just seen, but for some reason I don't. I can't explain why.
Chacun a son gout is some hillbillies version that sounds like everyone tastes different to me.
Roughly the opposite of what I think, as you can probably guess - I generally feel their passion far outstrips their technique, which was none too shabby either - but I do feel that way about Presley sometimes. Although in the case of Elvis, it's as if his talent was so vast, so awesome, so infinite, that actually applying it was almost excessive. And downright dangerous, likely to cause a rupture in the space-time continuum.
Hopefully there will be no fog in LA today and our friends will not lose their way.
THIS song's chorus is the new Red Sox anthem:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIuAFrLeXfY
I just assumed it would be "Let Me Up (I've Had Enough)"