MGR Games Ejected Games/Ejection
1 Richards 1837 82 22.4
2 Frisch 2246 88 25.5
3 Weaver 2541 96 26.5
4 Cox 4508 162 27.8
5 Gardenhire 2480 84 29.5
6 Gibbons 1582 53 29.8
7 C. Manuel 1826 52 35.1
8 Hutchinson 1666 45 37.0
9 Durocher 3739 100 37.4
10 Bristol 1424 37 38.5
11 McGraw 4769 121 39.4
12 Griffith 2917 73 40.0
13 Rigney 2561 64 40.0
14 Hurdle 2615 64 40.9
15 Maddon 2417 57 42.4
So, not the Hindenburg, then. Perhaps it was the Badyear blimp?
I remember the Canada Day game that lasted 19 innings.
Would have been more fun to put a position player in there right away and go with the emergency catcher.
Like, if I was you I wouldn't stand behind home plate.
Often, the manager gets ejected to prevent a hot head player from being ejected and we don't have guys like that.
Boston?
Yeah, the offense is mostly just Martinez, Bogaerts and Devers.
They've benefited from a very easy schedule.
Also the pen hasn't been great.
Jays are 4th in OPS, 8th in run scored second in HR.
RS are 1st in OPS, 1st in run scored, 6th in HR.
Jays are 19th in starter ERA (6th in walks per 9, 11th in Ks per 9, 25th in hits allowed and 29th in HR allowed) and 4th in relief ERA.
Sox are 12th in starter ERA (13th in walks per 9, 18th in Ks per 9, 17th in Hits) and they're the team who has allowed the fewest HR. Relief ERA is 12th.
The lower BABIP could indicate a fantastic defense, but the huge difference in home runs allowed tends to indicate they've faced bad teams. Or they're just lucky.
Wait what - the Tigers passed the Twins? Boston is also 3-1 against the Twins. So, 5-1 vs. teams below .400 - neither of which we've played yet. No wonder they're so hot. Of course, we get to play the Twins SEVEN times in September, when they'll have totally traded their veterans, called up hot-shot rookies, etc..
Meanwhile, Kansas, the 3rd place team, is barely better than Baltimore - our 5th place team. And the White Sox get to play these guys 19 times each. While we get a steady diet of NYY, TBR and BOS..
AL Beast indeed!
A typo, obviously. But such a delicious one that I think I'll let it stand. And figure out how to work the phrase "random blimp" into conversation.
I think it depends on the players as much as the manager. We don't seem to have hotheads, definitely not like Gibby did. Maybe the primary objective for Gibby was getting tossed rather than a Bautista or Donaldson getting tossed.
Make a statement, boys.
They've gone 1-1 against Toronto in Boston.
They've gone 3-0 against Tampa, but that was with Archer and Hill imploding on the mound and in Boston.
They've gone 6-4 against Baltimore.
April results can only carry you so far.
I have to disagree. Cox managed roughly the same number of games as Torre or Bochy and got thrown out twice as often. (And Torre and Bochy both got the heave more than the average themselves.) Durocher managed as many games as Stengel and got thrown out twice as often. Same with the guys who managed as many games as Weaver. Some deliberately used it as a tactic, to fire up their players (or to try to intimidate the umpires.) But mostly some managers are just hotheads.
I wish I could remember who was the manager who when asked why he argued with the umpires so often answered "Because there's nothing else you can do."
Good spot for Espinal to flash some leather with Ryu on the mound.
There is - obviously - none whatsoever. It's no more an advantage than having blue eyes. Cito Gaston got ejected more times in one season than Tom Kelly did in his entire 16 year career and they both have a couple of nice, shiny rings. McGraw and Cox were two of the greatest ever and each got thrown out almost as many times in one year as Joe McCarthy did in 24 years. There's simply more than one way to do the job.
Would any umpire get intimidated by some old guy acting like a 3 yr old who ain't getting jujubes at the grocery store?
If teams like the Jays and Phillies are choosing long-term to run short benches and long bullpens, it's imperative that this philosophy is coupled with a ruthlessly reactionary approach to immediately place any potential day-to-day injuries to position players on the IL at the earliest opportunity to cycle in an able-bodied bench player for the next game.
The past few years of watching the Jays play with a 0-to-1 man bench whenever someone gets banged up shows their FO isn't up to the task and sits on the fence all too often.
Watching Bryce Harper called in as a defensive sub who tries to bunt for a hit with runners on and then suddenly can take full hacks again a few innings later in the 9th, potentially risking a 330 million dollar asset, shows how risky the obsession-with-endless-middle-relievers strategy can be.
I'm not suggesting it ever actually worked, with the possible exception of when Rogers Hornsby simply hauled off and slugged one, explaining that "I wasn't getting anywhere talking to him."
It would be interesting to poll the players anonymously to see how they feel about manager ejections.
The pro-ejection argument seems to be that it shows the players that the "manager has their back"
Does the average player actually feel that way? Do they care? Are they just going along with tradition? Do they actually get fired up about it? How long does it last? Do they find it stupid/pointless/embarrassing/theatrical?
Do manager's scream at umpires in Japan? In Cuba? In Winter Leagues? If no, how do manager's then express their displeasure with the officiating?
I have no idea how it works in other countries. But in the majors, it appears that back in the 19th century most of the arguing with the umpires was done by the players. It was when some of those players started managing - in particular, John McGraw - that this changed.
Rowdy Tellez did a series of drills in the outfield earlier today to test his left hamstring. The LHH remains available on the bench tonight. There was concern after slipping on home plate Sunday afternoon. #bluejays pic.twitter.com/SHVDabN5U0
— Ben Wagner (@benwag247) May 18, 2021
Better than doing far too much codpiece modelling.
I feel your pain. I've been thinking about this very thing, and crunching some numbers.
There's a problem and the endless parade of middle relievers - I once called it "weaponizing mediocrity" - is an attempt to deal with it. Chicks dig the long ball, we're told, and that's all anyone tries to do these days. Hitters work the count and look for something they can uppercut.
We've got more than 30 years of pitch count data now and here's what's changed. In 1988, there was an average of 3.62 pitches per plate appearance. And in 2021, there's an average of 3.93 pitches per plate appearance.
Doesn't seem like much. But over the course of a season, it means you need to get another 2,500 pitches out of your staff. (In 1988, the average AL team threw 22,143 pitches; in 2019 the average AL team threw 24,547 pitches.)
That's about the number of pitches a back of the rotation starter might throw in a season (Drew Hutchison threw 2,456 pitches in 2015). You need to account for this workload somehow.
This is happening while every manager in the game is reducing the workload of his regular starters. In 1998, the Jays' starting pitcher threw 120 pitches or more in 40 games. No Toronto starter has thrown 120 pitches in a game since 2015.
So all these pitches - the extra ones required by the changing game, the ones no longer being thrown by your starters - have to come from somewhere. Hence the endless parade of middle relievers.
Nice.
We've got more than 30 years of pitch count data now and here's what's changed. In 1988, there was an average of 3.62 pitches per plate appearance. And in 2021, there's an average of 3.93 pitches per plate appearance.
Doesn't seem like much. But over the course of a season, it means you need to get another 2,500 pitches out of your staff. (In 1988, the average AL team threw 22,143 pitches; in 2019 the average AL team threw 24,547 pitches.)
Yep. This is another reason for the increase in game length over this period of time. Instead of taking 262 pitches to get through a game it takes 297 or whatever. I've looked at this issue before to figure out where all those extra pitches are coming from, and it's almost entirely due to two things: some more foul balls, and a lot more swings and misses. It's not so much hitters working the count as it is them not hitting the ball into play when they swing.
That's fascinating Magpie. This is a new revelation for me that I hadn't come across previously.
The decreasing pitch counts for starters and the increased use of one-inning middle relievers earlier into the game are well-known trends. I hadn't considered that total pitches a game in aggregate is also contributing to the trend.
We saw that against Houston when Montoyo brought in Chatwood to pitch to the heart of the order in the 8th and had Bergen to work against the bottom of the order. Slave to the Save may finally be dying - and Charlie Montoyo is the man killing it?
Cool.
Jon Gray.
Are any of you guys pissed about the lack of radio? This is shaping up to be an exciting season. the pandemic is crap. baseball radio would make my pandemic experience less crap, at the very least, and perhaps lots of people feel this way.
rogers has long been tone-deaf, but this radio garbage is just gross corporate greed.
on a positive side, everyone on the radio keeps saying what a 'joy' it is to watch Ryu pitch, and I agree completely. I can't recall a more fun Jays pitcher to watch since Doc?
2 more years after this at $13.3 Million AAV, plus a $16 Million team option for 2024.
I can only tell you what I've learned from watching Japanese TV commercials: it seems the answer is Yes, absolutely.
Too bad we didn't really get into Boston's bullpen.
Many teams will use a long man in the first game of a series to protect the pen.
In this game, they suppressed the homerun by staying away.
Staying away and playing the shift makes you vulnerable to hitters who can go the other way.
I have no problem with that.
Feels pretty good after that Fangraphs statement that Judge was carrying the Yankees and Guerrero was carrying the Blue Jays. 16 hit game followed by an 18 hit game.
Was using Chatwood for 7 pitches a bad move? I think not.
Also, Dolis is a guy who took a long time to find it in the beginning.
No problem with getting him easy work.
Beasley and Mayza are question marks in my book.
That leaves Romano, Cole, Payamps and Thornton.
Castro might be the next guy to come back, but not in this series.
They are lining up Manoah to take over Stripling's spot.
Allgeyer will line up to cover up Kay.
Lots of injuries league-wide, but there seems to be be more pitcher attrition than hitter attrition at play as well.
Jays season line now .252./.317/.343 - 105 wRC+, 7th in MLB. But how they've done it is impressive. Slow start and then just hitting better and better.
April - .233/.307/.398 - 96 wRC+
Past 30 days - .266/.330/.453 - 116 wRC+
May - 278/.333/.457 - 118 wRC+
Last 14 days - .291/.345/.490 wRC+ - 131 wRC+
last 7 days - .311/.369/.514 - 144 wRC+
As far as trade targets, I concur with Jon Gray. This FO has shown that they prefer free agency for their big pickups and want to hold on to prospects, so a trade for a rental where the acquisition cost should be lower is likely more realistic. I would also expect picking up a SP who is having a bad season but has a strong strike out rate. Atkins has had some luck with those types of mid-season pickups (Liriano, Ray).
The seven-inning doubleheaders and extra-inning baserunners are positive developments for the game. The three batter rule is acceptable. The automatic intentional walk is fine. The six mound visits sounds about right. The replay process has marginally improved. All these things will hopefully prevent the games from lengthening any further. And more afternoon baseball is desirable.
What were we saying 2 years ago? Well, we weren't thinking 100 losses yet, that was about a month or so later, 90 was the number at the time. A couple of nameless posters quotes.
"A front office should not be rewarded for gutting a team and replacing it with filler, it’s just a lazy and irresponsible way to rebuild or retool.....Teoscar - exposed as filler.... Literally every prospect these guys develop or acquire does not pan out unless drafted...so we’re expected to wait for waves of their special drafts which should be 2016-2022 drafts...graduating 2020-2026...just in time for when Vlad leaves."
"I've been resigned to waiting on the actual young core for a while now.
Which would mean any hopes of contending are at least 4-5yrs away.
The only way I see that timeone changing much is if vlad can hit well enough quickly enough that we start winning game a right now before we sell off all the good prime talent we have left."(sic)
That said, kudos to Mike Green and a few others for rays of positivity and seeing the big picture at the time.
He is terrific. A craftsman who rarely gets rattled. Great example for the youngsters.
His contract is looking awfully good right now.
Thanks for the link Jonny. That was a great watch.
I'm not a believer in the "everything is racist" trope so popular today, but I do find it interesting that they cast a Person of Colour actor to portray the citizen on the sidewalk arguing the umpire's call. From what I can tell, he was the only non-ethnically Japanese actor in the commercial.
My guess is that a POC actor was chosen to represent American expats who come over to manage teams in the NPB.
So the commercial does seem to confirm that their managers do in fact argue with umpires face-to-face in the NPB, but the casting choice leads me to believe that the Japanese still consider it to be an imported American trait/tradition.
I'm hopeless with batted ball data, but by the eye test from the games I've watched since Jansen broke his O-fer streak, all his hits I've seen other than his 3 HRs have been weak seeing eye singles and bloop hits for singles.
I'm happy for Danny, but I can't help but think every time I see a weak hit fall in for him "Wow, that was lucky" and that it's less of an improved approach and finally some better batted ball luck.
Same for Santiago Espinal. The ball doesn't seem to come off his bat very hard when he does make contact.
The prime culprits are Chatwood (-0.2) and Thornton (-0.2). They need to work on their conversions between starting and relief. They project pitchers to have the same ERA in both roles and that creates problems"
Yesh jt's the worst part of their projections and frankly I'm unimpressed they still haven't addressed it.
Jansen MAY: 44pa, .280babip, 115wrc+
With replays, what are you fighting about? Yelling at the Umps was pretty stupid before, now it is ridiculous.
(Fix the balls & strikes with robocall umps and it should drop to zero.)
Now up to 5 guys with a 120+ OPS+ in the regular lineup - Vlad, Semien, Bo, Grichuk, Hernandez. Jansen still at 34 but climbing fast (remember, he was a negative OPS+ not long ago). Gurriel warming up to a 61 - on APril 23rd he was hitting 179/213/196 but since has hit 271/276/412 - now if he could just learn to take a walk it would do wonders. Jansen's basement appears to be the day Kirk went down (May 1st) 044/140/067 (ugh) but since 256/310/487 which is pretty much what Kirk was hitting (225/326/475). Meanwhile by some miracle McGuire figured out which end of the bat to use in 2021 (he forgot in 2020) hitting 333/429/333 so far. I wouldn't put much weight on that though (4 for 12) but it is one more hit than he had in 2020 (3 for 41).
The big nightmares are Biggio at 3B (terrible defense, 88 OPS+ isn't enough to compensate) and Tellez at DH/1B (42 OPS+ just a 551 OPS since returning, which is better than the 489 he went down with but not what is needed from a guy with such limited skills). Whenever Springer (or Panik or even Kirk maybe) returns Tellez goes back to AAA obviously.
Right now I like the bench with Davis & Espinal as both have strong defense and good speed - very useful off the bench with a team of sluggers who play 'meh' defense at best. McGuire is endurable as a backup catcher but I prefer him in AAA/travel squad.
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2021-draft-notebook-the-process/
Found this interesting:
One of the most impactful innovations over the last decade has been that of the draft model. Nearly every team utilizes some kind of projection and/or scoring model that takes in historical performance and other, more advanced data sources and spits out some measure of draft value, but one American League evaluator worried that the lack of recent information will result in a garbage in/garbage out scenario. “We have guys who had a rough three weeks in 2020 but are playing well now,” he said, lamenting the incredibly small samples produced by the pandemic. “I think a lot of models are just going to have to be thrown out the window this year.”
"90.1
The Blue Jays’ average exit velocity in miles per hour, entering play on Tuesday. The Blue Jays have quite a few players who hit the ball very hard and, as a team, they have the highest average exit velocity."
Yesterday's lineup
LeMahieu 111 OPS+
Gardner 53
Judge 177
Urshela 122
Odor 86
Sanchez 101
Andujar -1
Ford 51
Lamarre -54
Taxi Squad rules:
Up to five players can be on the Taxi Squad and travel with the team.
If 3 players or more are on the Taxi Squad, one must be a catcher.
A catcher on the Taxi Squad can also be the bullpen catcher.
There is much less need for the Taxi Squad when playing at home.
- It's only in place for away games, not home games.
- It's not mandatory or formal - there are no announcements.
- If a team chooses to use a taxi squad for a road trip, it must START WITH at least one catcher and no more than five players. However, if the catcher joins the MLB team during the trip (like Riley Adams did), he doesn't need to be replaced.
- The taxi squad players have cleared COVID protocols and can join the active roster without any delays.
From MLB:
Upon the conclusion of each road trip, players on the Taxi Squad will return to the Alternate Training Site.
Oakland and Boston are the worst at giving up runs.
Cleveland is low scoring and also about the best at not giving up runs. They seem to be in the weakest division so have a schedule advantage. They did recently trade Clevinger and Lindor so they probably don't pay to add much at the deadline. Retooling?
Everyone else will make a trade deadline move. TB makes things work somehow. W Franco may come up.
The Jays may add a position player rental at the deadline. They have depth which is Atkins special talent. Springer could come back to play the field.
- 0 errors
- 1 passed ball
- 6 wild pitches (best in MLB)
- 19 steals allowed
That's a total of 26 "catcher bases allowed", which is best in the MLB. The league average is 42, with the Red Sox (57) and Dodgers (63) notably bad.
The caught stealing % is 3rd worst at 17%, but the league average is only 23%.
Obviously, much of this (wild pitches, stolen bases) depends on the pitcher as much as the catcher, but it seems that our backstops are doing a fine job compared to their peers.
Former major league pitcher and current A’s television analyst Dallas Braden was effusive in his praise of struggling Blue Jays catcher Danny Jansen : “Jansen is an excellent defensive catcher. The type of catcher any pitcher wants to throw to. Jansen has blocked 99.2% of the balls thrown in the dirt since the 2020 season. When you can do that, you really don’t worry about him going 2 for 35. You just want him to catch your pitchers.”
IMO he has enough patience and pop to hit well enough to allow that defense to keep him contributing real positive value overall, but it might not be enough to keep him starting longterm.
Then again, with his hitting profile there's always the potential of a him putting up a legit elite year overall with a bit of babip luck.
Based on that Kirk isn't so good. Maybe they need to do with him what they did with Jansen - tell him focus 100% on defense for a season. His bat is good enough that doing that he should still be productive. Hopefully during the injury break he is working on learning how to call games better, and any other items you can learn from a desk vs the field.
Gurriel's last 5 games: .455/.435/.591
Gurriel is especially interesting. Small sample size, obviously, but in each of the last three seasons he's put together a solid month where he hits rather like that. He's as streaky as anyone I can think of. As always, now would be a good time.
The current form of the Taxi Squad exist so that replacement players can clear the Covid protocols in advance of moves.
Apparently, the latest version says that a catcher is required only if there are more than 2 players total on the Taxi Squad. Regardless, it says you can use the bullpen catcher to fill the catcher requirement. As for being official, it's a lot like the emergency catcher.
Ha-Seong Kim, 59.
I would agree by the eye test. I seem to remember Jansen swinging through some dead centre fastballs in PAs recently.
Looking at Fangraphs Pitch Info values though, I don't see any unusual trends that would account for Jansen being worse than his previous norm.
His 2021 -2.39 runs per 100 4-seamers isn't the far off his career of -1.80.
He's seeing more 4 seamers this year (40.2%) compared to last year (29.8%). But his 2021 percentages aren't that far off from previous years (38.0% 2019, 36.1% 2018).
So Jansen always been a below-average fastball hitter, but there isn't a whole lot to suggest he's performing worse than usual against them or that pitchers are challenging him that much more.
Lindor: 71 OPS+ (0.2 WAR) vs Semien 127 (1.6 WAR)
McCann: 49 OPS+ (-0.2 WAR) vs Jansen 34 OPS+ (-0.1 WAR)
Ha-Seong Kim 59 OPS+ (0.4 WAR) vs Biggio I guess (88 OPS+ -0.1 WAR)
I figure if McCann was signed Jansen would've been a backup or traded. If Lindor or Kim were signed then Semien wouldn't have been, but to keep it as a 1-1 ratio I benched Biggio for this comparison. Kim's value is all defense (0.6 bWAR) - at 3B & 2B his defense has been very good, at SS not so much.
10 million a year isn't exactly an albatross, but 4 years is a long time for someone who's been good for all of a year and a half.
62nd percentile = good
50th percentile = average
32nd percentile = bad
Big push to get DJ LeMahieu last winter - he is at 111 OPS+ with a 1.1 WAR. Not as nice as Semien but solid.
So the infield battle...
- Semien: 127 OPS+, 1.6 WAR
- LeMahieu: 111 OPS+, 1.1 WAR
- Kim: 59 OPS+, 0.4 WAR
- Lindor: 71 OPS+, -0.2 WAR
https://www.pitcherlist.com/tyler-chatwood-has-become-a-uniquely-dominant-reliever/
Oddly, I was just reading about another pitcher with Blue Jays ties that has become an elite reliever by also turning a formerly little used pitch into a weapon.
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/kendall-graveman-is-now-a-relief-ace-in-seattle/
Graveman is a long time favourite because of the story of how he instantly turned from a non-prospect into a major leaguer in the middle of a game.
Then think of Carlos Baerga, who went from Cleveland to the Mets about five years before Alomar. He was 27 when he was traded, and through his age 26 season he'd hit .303/.345/.454, with a couple of 200 hit seasons.
. I never liked the stripling trade from the start, but hopefully he will better in model relief.
Them lining up Manoah on the same day seems too perfect to be a coincidence (even if I might be in the minority and prefer he get another AAA start or two).
Also geez that was one late stop sign from Rivera. Semien probably should’ve just committed and gone home once he was that far.
But the ball is flying tonight. Lots of runs coming.
And great slide by vladdy.
I can understand when the pitcher can't find the strike zone, but when he's hitting the glove and getting shelled?
His strategy is to exhaust the hitters by letting them hit and run around the bases.
We certainly notice them when they happen with this team. Nevertheless, during Rivera's tenure as third base coach, the Blue Jays have generally had fewer runners thrown out at the plate than the average AL team, sometimes far fewer, and they've never led the league in runners thrown out at home.
2013: Jays 11, Boston 25, Average 16 2014: Jays 16, Angels/Yankees 21, Average 16 2015: Jays 14, Detroit 25, Average 19 2016: Jays 14, Texas 23, Average 16 2017: Jays 19, Boston 29, Average 17 2018: Jays 21, Minnesota 25, Average 18 2019: Jays 7, Tampa Bay 22, Average 15 2020: Jays 9, Baltimore/Oakland 10, Average 6 2021: Jays 3, Boston/New York 7, Average 4
It's maddening every time it happens, but it does happen more often elsewhere.
Methinks it’s time.
Manoah taking his next start would be a great development.
What, 18 innings above A ball isn't enough?
I'm thinking I'd at least like to see him itch as many innings in AAA as Roger Clemens did (46.2).
Pearson is 24 and debuted at 23.
SWR is 20.
Sanchez were rushed up by failure to assemble a proper pitching staff.
He was put in the pen at 21 and the conversion to starter was screwed up because he had only thrown 92 innings in 2015.
Stroman was up at 23 and threw 165 innings, including 35 in AAA with an ERA of 3.03.
Manoah is projected to be shut down after 130 innings. How many of those should be in AAA where he's striking out over 13 per 9 innings?
Is there a danger that he'll be worse than Stripling and sent back down like Pearson?
I don't think so.
Manoah is good for another 19 starts.
It's not about spending time. It's about performing.
They want Manoah to throw more changeup when he's behind in the count. Whatever.
Pearson has changed his delivery and needs to make adjustments.
Then learn to repeat his new delivery.
With a win tonight they would have been in first place.
Instead they'll be in 3rd place half a game ahead of 4th place.
We want a pitcher not a belly itcher
Jays had reams of TrackMan data on Stripling. They knew the stuff he had. Teams think they can fix other teams players. Sometime they can, sometimes they can't.
Chase rate percentiles
2018 - 85th
2019 - 49th
2020 -7th
2021- 3rd
While a more accurate picture could likely be had with a detailed study and review, my gut reaction is that is a *bad* indication, not a good one. In general, MLB team's (and 3b coaches in particular) are too conservative about trying for home. From a Run Expectation/Win Expectation you'd expect that you should risk outs more aggressively than they do, but this is a little like other "risky" plays (like going for it on 4th down in the NFL or doing 2 point converts etc.) where the downside for the coach of (correctly) going for it and it not working is much larger than the downside of (incorrectly) not going for it and far fewer people noticing.
If there's a runner on 2nd and 2 outs and there's a sharp hit single right to the left fielder on a bounce should the runner go for home challenging the throw? From a run expectations point of view if an "average" batter is coming up next the choice is 1st and 3rd with two outs or either score a run and runner on 1st (even assuming the runner can't advance to 2nd, which he might be able on a play at the plate) or else end the inning. 103 with 2 outs had a 0.54 RE in 2020. 100 with 2 outs had a 0.24 RE. So if you are p likely to make it, you should go for it when p*1.24 > 0.54 => go for home if the chance of scoring is at least 43.5% (and even lower if the runner on 1st will advance to 2nd on the play to the plate, then you need 40.6%). And if the next batter up is worse than average or the pitcher is better than average you should go on even lower chances. But if you told the 3rd base coach that the chance of success was 45% or even 50% would they send them in most games?
So if the Jays consistently have the fewest runners thrown out at home my initial suspicion is they are too cautious going for it.
As I said though there are a lot of factors and a relatively small sample size, so you'd have to study it more closely to be sure, but in general MLB teams don't try for home aggressively enough.
Maybe Thornton first, Stripling second would have worked a lot better.
Stripling is a flyball pitcher, not a good fit for Dunedin.
Riley Adams is hitting .133 with 2 HR in AAA.
3 vs Baltimore
1 vs Detroit
1 vs the Angels
1 vs the Mets
1 vs Atlanta
1 vs Seattle
1 vs the White Sox
1 vs Tampa
Against the White Sox, he threw 83 pitches and didn't complete the 4th inning but only allowed 2 runs.
Sometimes his faulty instructions are more troubling than mere outs at the plate. May the 2nd: Gurriel doubles to left, Grichuk with a good jump from first is waved home--based our announcers suggest by Ozuna's poor-arm rep although the great relay from the Braves shortstop was apparently ill-considered...Grichuk out, D'Arnaud to the 60-day with an injured thumb. The video replay shows Rivera muffling his very late stop sign.
You want the runner to hurry up to 3rd otherwise there's no chance to score.
Ideally, the final decision should be made before the runner reaches 3rd, but as soon as the coach has reason to think the player won't make it he gives the stop.
It might take a long time for the fielder to get to the ball. Maybe it's rolling.
Whenever the fielder has the ball, it depends on how shallow he is, how good an arm he has and possibly on where the throw is headed.
It's easy to get hurt if you have to slam the breaks and go back to 3rd.
It would have been a lot worse had Semien pulled something on that play.
I remember Gurriel had a leg injury on a change do direction play at second 2 years ago.
In previous years, the Jays almost never scored from first.
That was not in the cards in the Encarnation, Bautista, Smoak, etc days.
No mean feat for a 1B.
Does anyone have an angle on the play?
It didn't cost us the game, but it deflated a possible multi-run inning.
I don't really have an opinion on Rivera, but here is what I know is fact. AA hired him in 2010 and he became the 3rd base coach in 2012. He kept the job throughout AA's tenure. There has been a lot of turnover under the new FO. Only 2 coaches are left from AA's time - Rivera and Pete Walker. That to me is the most telling "statistic"
And it very well may have cost the Jays game. Richards was who we thought he was, and we let him off the hook. The inning and game would have looked very different if Vlad came up with 2nd and 3rd and no outs instead of having a runner on 2nd with one out.
The good news is the Jays have Matz on the bump tonight with a rested pen to win the series and move back into the division lead in the (fewest) loss column.
Either way, I don't really care if he muffs the odd call, they can't all be zingers. I am in one hundred percent agreement with hyperbole: Rivera and Walker have survived multiple changes in both on field staff and front offices -- there's something there that is well liked by the people on the inside, and I think that's the more important factor. Only recently I feel like we're starting to hear rumblings about Walker's reputation league wide, I'd be curious what other teams thought of Rivera as well.
Martinez has become insufferable this season. He's always been a culture warrior in baseball, but this year the constant whinging has reached epic levels. How many consecutive nights do we need to hear about catchers on one knee or pitchers throwing fastballs? Or about how new fangle baseball stats are hurting baseball.
I'm fine with a little editorializing, but Buck just seems to have an infinite supply of opinions, and they come across so pompous and arrogant. Not to mention that fact that when he calls PBP there is ZERO effort to appeal to radio listeners.
Just call the damn action on the field. It's embarrassing.
Though Eephus does bring up a good point - Buck's not a bad Crotchity Old Vet Telling Stories color guy. He's just woefully miscast as a play-by-play guy because he gets caught in between trying to do both roles, and does them both poorly. Then, when he gets back to being a color guy with Shulman, he gets caught in between, just not as bad, and probably just from mixing the roles.
Sadly, I find myself as an adult complaining about his complaining. The fourteen year old me couldn't imagine doing this.
Tyler Chatwood has been a fabulous pickup and I hope they extend him. He has been elite in pretty much every category.
Of course, it might not work as well over the radio...
I also grew up with Ernie Harwell, George Kell and AL Kaline. Harwell is iconic, obviously, but Kaline and Kell were both boring as hell yet you loved listening to them.
I don't know. Was it really as bad as all that?
And red Sox series make it all the worse as buck can't help but cheer for Boston in between beating the same dead horses that made him an horrific manager.
That doesn't bode well for playing in Toronto this summer.
Then they decided not to put Tellez on the IL. He pinch hit yesterday and walked.
Gurriel has some king of knee issue and is day-to-day.
Valera has been taking outfield drills.
The bottom of the order was able to string hits together.
Maybe they don't have a good scouting report on these guys.
The Boston offense was supposed to be just the 3-4-5 hitters.
It's the 6-8-9 guys who did the most damage.
It's hard to be too upset. They didn't walk those guys.
They got some hits, nothing hit that hard.
I'm more upset about the non-competitive starters in the rotation.
That game that Pearson started without going to AAA for 2 or 3 dominant starts first.
Matz has been better than I expected but not much.
Ray has been worse--mostly because of the time missed because of the bruised elbow.
Ryu, Merryweather, Stripling, Romano, Dolis, Chatwood, Mayza, Borucki, Semien all performing as expected.
Kay, Zeuch, Roark have been worse than I hoped.
Phelps, Springer, Kirk, Hatch, Pearson, Murphy, Gurriel, Tellez have all done less than I expected.
Bergen has been better so far than I expected.
I was hoping Castro would be good, but I didn't count on it.
Grichuk has been a surprise, but he's still not a good as Springer would have been.
I didn't expect McGuire to play here at all.
While the Jays can shore up at the deadline, they are playing with fire in the mean time if someone doesn't step up. It doesn't look to be Stripling so they need one of Hatch, Kay, Pearson or Manoah to come through...or may be Thorton...and ideally two of them.
Bad enough that the Red Sox aren't actually even that good, but even worse that we lost this series due to issues more in line with what we expected coming into the season - plenty of offense, but unreliable pitching - both starters and relievers.
The rotation, IMO, has gone pretty much as expected so far:
Ryu: 8gs, 5.8ip/gs, 59era-, 76fip-, 75xfip-
One legit top rotation pitcher, though not a true workhorse type.
Ray: 9gs, 5.8ip/gs, 89era-, 133fip-, 84xfip-
Matz: 7gs, 5.3ip/gs, 110era-, 105fip-, 90xfip-
Two decent but inconsistent middle-to-back rotation types.
Other: 16gs, 3.5ip/gs 165era-, 152fip-, 121xfip-
I guess we maybe could have expected better than this from the lottery tickets at the back of the rotation, but relying on these types for two slots in the rotation was always too ambitious - this kind of competition for the 5 spot is ok, not so much for the 4 spot.
I guess the big point of contention in this last part is whether Stripling was realistically more than just a junk drawer guy.
They've done that reasonably well, so I expect that Stripling's leach is shortening with every start.
Also, I think everyone is getting tired of Dunedin now.
I don't know how to qualify that move just yet.