Biggio
Guerrero
Springer
Bichette
Grichuk
Hernandez
I like Biggio up top because of his OBP and great running instincts.
Vlad next because he's the best hitter and you want to get him as many at bats as possible.
Springer doesn't steal much anymore and he's the 2nd best hitter I think and the biggest incentive to not intentionally walk Vlad.
And Bichette is the 3rd best hitter I think on the team so he goes next.
I could be convinced to reverse Springer and Vlad but I really like Springer following Vlad for the reasons stated.
Ah well. Could be worse. They could've gone to a division rival like Pat Gillick did to Baltimore (and got a wild card his first full year 1996, division title year 2, then a poor 3rd year and resigned as ownership went coocoo and started a 14 year stretch of 10+ games back, 13 of those 20+ back, 6 30+ back of the division).
I was going to comment that young Ian has accomplished much at a young age. But some investigation confirms that old Ian recorded Aqualung at the age of 23. It's a tough name to live up to.
Not quite the way I would do it, but I don’t have an issue with that order.
In terms of Montoyo’s set up, I guess there is some logic in leaving Springer at the top, but I feel Biggio’s value is as a set up guy so belongs at 1 or 8 or 9. I don’t understand why Montoyo has been putting him in the 5 to 7 holes most of the year.
Of course if everyone returns to career norms or better (VG!) it almost doesn’t matter.
I'd see how far Borucki can take you in one of the games. He might be able to give you three good innings.
They've done things that made less sense.
Matz goes Monday and Kay is eligible for Tuesday (in 2021, the minimum for a minor league assignment is 10 days).
I would guess that Springer wouldn't agree with this. I've heard it said out loud that he wants to bat leadoff. I am guessing he will have his way.
As for Alomar sad day for sure. Not a surprise given baseball culture but I wish it would be better. I don't like his response about the "current social climate". Bad things are bad things regardless. When you add in the sadness about Halladay passed away makes me a bit wistful about our HoF members.
John, the next one may be the guy who inherited the worst team in baseball. It's very early, but his team has a better record than either Atlanta or Toronto.
Does anyone else see a trivial question looming? I already cheated and looked it up.
And Gene Tenace doesn't count! He only worked for them.
Back in 1991 when Devon White wanted to bat leadoff badly Gaston said 'OK' and put him and his (at the time) career 295 OBP in the leadoff hole. Ugh. But 3 division titles and 2 WS later it clearly didn't hurt. In 1992 he had a 303 OBP and every single game Devo started he lead off.
I say keep Springer leadoff if it means a lot to him. Bo #2, Vlad #3, Hernandez #4 and you've got a good thing going. Biggio isn't bad in the #6 hole to set it up for the worst hitters (7/8/9) and basically you need to get him thinking of himself as a mid-order leadoff man who is setting it up for the bottom of the order to be useful. If he would be more comfortable in the 9 hole then so be it, put him there. But some players hate batting last (ego) so I'd be checking that he is OK with it and would use it as an incentive. For example, in 1985 the Jays put Tony Fernandez 9th for 117 out of 162 games, leadoff for 22 games (mostly 2nd or 8th otherwise) as Damaso Garcia and his horrid OBP loved being #1. Tony was viewed as the 2nd leadoff guy in that slot and that was how the media talked about it all the time. The next year he was leadoff for 107 games, 26 times 9th, and mostly 2nd otherwise. (I love BR btw).
Now, as to Roberto Alomar. Sigh. What a sad, sad situation. For it to take over 7 years from time it happened until now with him banned from baseball like Pete Rose is a shame. Unlike Rose & the Reds though the Jays are removing all Alomar based things from the park it sounds like. So our 2 HOF'ers are now dead and ineligible. Sigh.
Does anyone else see a trivial question looming? I already cheated and looked it up.
I can get to 7? Springer, Borders, Molitor, Stewart, Morris, Eckstein and Pearce.
He got the message that time and did a superlative job of redemption with the ump and his son, and his HOF entry let us all relive his glory days.
And now… clearly he didn’t learn his lesson.
Really makes me wish the Jays had thrown that $150M at Realmuto instead, like I wanted.. The upgrade over Jansen would have been PHENOMENAL and Grichuk/Hernandez/etc should still be a decent outfield..
You'll remember one of the other two, and kick yourself a little. And the other guy, you'll go - I completely forgot he was a Blue Jay. I may have been making a sandwich at the time.
Basically, Jansen isn't as bad as he looks. He has been bad no matter what, but not THIS bad. He must have run over a black cat that gave him a curse or something. FYI: Reese McGuire's wOBA last year was 091 with an xwOBA of 123 so he had bad luck but not as bad as Jansen's and he hit even worse. It would be nice to see a leaderboard of who has the biggest spread between expected and actual OBA.
The ninth man played 15 years in the majors, and appeared in exactly 6 games for the Blue Jays.
For example, many teams had their best reliever only pitching in save situation.
We don't see much late inning pitch hitting.
You want to see the best hitters more often than the worse ones.
Guerrero might get walked if first is opened regardless of who hits behind him.
So who follows whom doesn't matter as much.
A high OBP guy is not worse than a power hitter there.
Is it better to have Jensen hitting 9th or Davis?
It probably doesn't matter much.
Remember that Halladay is not a Jays HOF'er.
He went as himself only.
Tanner Roark is back and gone, he has been DFA'd.
Riley is hitting .301 and batting 7th.
No different.
I guess the good news here is that Springer is a career .375 hitter against Smyly.
Espinal, Davis or Hernandez? Kirk or Jansen?
Part of the Bisons roster has been announced.
The pitchers are
James Dykstra (30 year old career minor guy)
Jon Harris
Connor Law
Jackson McClelland (guy can reach 3 digits but has never figured it out, reliever, still only 26)
Marc Rzepczynski (Good ol' scrabble, 35 now)
Tayler Saucedo
Graham Spraker (Watched him pitch in the spring. WTF, he had like 12 different arm angles and release points)
Curtis Taylor
It's Frank Viola! Who went and won the Cy Young the following year. Had a nice career (176 wins.) I've never seen a no-hitter in person. I was in the stands for Dave Stieb's Roberto Kelly Game. I was in the press box for Doc's Bobby Higginson Game. And I was there in the final week of the 1992 season when Viola hooked up with David Cone in a dandy. Cone allowed a solo HR to John Valentin. Viola didn't give up a hit until Devon White led off the ninth with a bloop single.
Tough loss for Cone, but no one wins when they score zero runs. Three times that month, the Jays provided Cone with exactly 1 run. He won two of those games.
New rotation: Ryu, Matz, Ray, Stripling, bullpen day. Lets hope the AAA season finds the Jays a nice surprise or two quickly. Anibal Sanchez entering his age 37 season after a 67 ERA+ season last year (53 IP) is not too exciting to me. He was solid in 2018, wow in 2013, very good from 2009 to 2014. But 2015 to 2020 he has an 88 ERA+ 2.9 BB/9 8.0 K/9 1.6 HR/9 - not exciting to me. Plus no idea who he will sign with - probably a mix of dollars and role. A few other pitchers are still out there as free agents, but no wows of course at this point. Jeff Samardzija (very good in 2019, horrid in 2020), Rick Porcello (last really good in 2016), Mike Leake (Skipped 2020 but was solid before that, 100 ERA+ inning eater), Cole Hamels (1 start in 2020, working out but not signed), Homer Bailey (decent guy but just 2 starts in 2020). I'd be chasing down Hamels if healthy and ready, then Leake, Samardzija, Bailey, and wouldn't bother with Porcello unless really impressive in workouts.
Well, he gets his $12 million whatever happens - no one will claim him on waivers or trade for him. The Jays can either send him to the minors or release him.
I suspect they just watched him pitch and said... Naaahh. This isn't going to get any better.
Anyways. I'll ask the same question I did last year. With Espinal on the bench, why is Joe Panik on the team?
Well, the dude was a rock star. I figure he was acting like one.
“Kirk has several elite statistical indicators, both in his surface-level on-field performance and in the background TrackMan data from his 2019 minor league campaign (in addition to what I have over on The Board, a source tells me his expected stats based on quality of contact are very similar to his 2019 Hi-A slash line of .288/.395/.446), and eyeball scouts acknowledge he’s a terrific offensive player.
“But there is skepticism surrounding his long-term athletic viability because Kirk is a very husky guy (listed at 5-foot-8, 265) without a body comp precedent in baseball, or arguably across all of pro sports. Because Christian Vazquez is listed at 5-foot-9, 205 (which is either an embarassing oversight or an intentional lie), the closest measurable comp to Kirk is José Molina at 5-foot-10, 250, but that’s from when Molina was nearly 40-years-old, whereas Kirk is only 22. It’s very difficult to anticipate what might happen to his frame as he enters his mid-20s, when many other players are thickening up as they reach maturity. All of this creates doubt surrounding whether or not Kirk can catch right now and/or long-term. But because he made his major league debut in 2020, we’ve gotten to see him do it a handful of times, and for a lot of different pitchers, at the big-league level. Kirk’s receiving and framing are okay. He catches on one knee even with runners on base, which makes him especially good at framing balls toward the bottom of the zone. He sets his target then lets his glove hand go slack and works back to the ball as it heads home, which magnifies issues with visual presentation to umpires when his pitcher misses his spot. In general, Kirk just has a slow-moving glove and doesn’t catch pitches at the top of the zone as cleanly as the softy sinkers at the bottom, and I wonder if he’ll have more obvious issues catching power arms, though he did fine in two outings as Robbie Ray’s backstop. Kirk’s legs set up as wide as they can go when he’s in his modified crouch so he can try to block balls without actually having to move his whole body laterally, and it actually works okay. He’s not a great thrower despite an average arm because he’s so slow out of his crouch, and sometimes he’ll throw from one knee to circumvent this.
“My visual evaluation is that he’s a passable defender, not a good one, and I think the Jays deep stable of catchers will dictate that he DHs sometimes and catches at others. The more 1B/DH Kirk has to play during his years of team control, the less valuable he’ll be. He has an all-fields, doubles-oriented approach that prioritizes contact and walks, which I think is great for a catcher but won’t be at first. He’s an everyday big league catcher right now, but he may have an abnormally early decline phase. (Alternate site, MLB).”
Other elite ones include Tulo/Bautista/Donaldson/EE (2015) and the various combos used by the 1993 team (the roster included Henderson, White, Alomar, Molitor, Olerud, Carter, Fernandez — incredible array of offensive talent).
Coincidentally, I've been reading about Hack Wilson, who stood 5'6 and while he's listed as 190 pounds was probably much more like 230. Wilson, of course, spent his career playing centre field.
I don't know that he played it well, but...
1. CF Springer
2. 1B Guerrero
3. SS Bichette
4. LF Hernandez
5. 3B Biggio
6. C Kirk
7. RF Grichuk
8. 2B Semien
9. DH
White/Alomar/Molitor/Carter/Olerud followed by Fernandez. Then Henderson added mid-season to make it even more intimidating. Remember, Olerud won the batting title (and OBP and OPS titles) while Molitor was 2nd and Alomar 3rd for batting average. By OPS+ WAMCO was 108/141/143/112/186 Fernandez 115, Henderson though had a terrible time as a Jay (215/356/319 83 OPS+). Sprague at 3B was worse than I remembered (86 OPS+) while Borders was a defensive catcher (75 OPS+). The bench was bad too leading to a team 110 OPS+ which is far lower than it should've been.
2015 had that scary Donaldson/Bautista/Encarnacion middle - 151/145/148 OPS+'s. Sadly they couldn't figure out the leadoff slot - Reyes 69 games (322 OBP), Revere 33 games (329 OBP), Tulo 26 games (325 OBP), Travis 22 games (272 OBP). Ugh.
This year has a chance to be something special. Of course, this nutty game tonight kind of makes it seem better than it is I suspect. But what is really good is they should be there 1-5 for a few years unless trades happen (Springer/Bichette/Vlad/Hernandez/Grichuk) with Kirk maybe moving up if this keeps up.
2. 1B Guerrero
3. SS Bichette
4. DH Hernandez
5. C Kirk
6. 3B Biggio
7. RF Grichuk
8. 2B Semien
9. LF Gurriel
2. 1B Guerrero
3. SS Bichette
4. DH Hernandez
5. C Kirk
If Springer must lead off I support this. I do think pitching around Guerrero is a problem the Jays want to have answers for. (Plus as a fan, I want to see him get pitches in the zone that he can hit.)
So the most exciting thing for me tonight would be...
Nah. It's the Captain, my Captain!
I was totally with Tabler, I loved it, I thought it was a great idea. Kirk's a disciplined young hitter, he's not so likely to get out of what he knows he can do. The team already had a two run lead. And because it was a very young hitter looking up at the Mendoza Line there was a non-zero chance of him getting a BP fastball.
It seldom works out that well, but it was worth a shot. And every hitter on the team noticed and approved, which is a good thing as well.
What weird, topsy-turvy universe have we all fallen into?
When Hernandez was on the Covid-IL, he freed a 40 roster spot that they used for Castro.
So the choice now was to send Castro back to the minors or outright someone--who would have to go through waivers.
Makes sense that the guy they find the least useful was Roark.
Roark could accept a minor league assignment--he's probably heading there anyway--but probably not off the 40 roster.
I imagine Milone would be the next to go if they acquire someone or if Hatch comes off the IL.
Or Beasley who hasn't done much yet.
I don't think it matters much where Kirk hits, but I think he might get more playing time going forward.
Like on a bullpen day.
After today, they could activate Stripling and send Bergen or Tice.
I imagine they keep Espinal until they bring Tellez back.
They could let Thornton go deeper, but Atlanta, like most team, is pretty top heavy.
Milone could fall out of graces here as well.
Panik is getting a lot of consideration simply because he bats left handed on a heavily right handed roster. He may only be hitting singles, when he hits at all, but his left handedness seems to be his passport.
Given that Panik can't defend third base very well and given that his role as a pinch-hitter seems far less likely moving forward, hopefully any future roster decision between Espinal and Panik will be in Espinal's favour.
Despite talk on the broadcasts, I disagree that a fulltime job lies in Espinal's future, given that he is 26, but he serves more uses than Panik does as a bench player, even if he is a right handed hitter.
Ray is throwing a lot of fastballs and sometimes the hitters hit them hard. The results are good when the balls are hit right at the fielders.
1.CF Springer 232pa, .257babip, .358obp, 143wrc+
2.1B Guerrero 345pa, .303babip, .377obp, 144wrc+
3.SS Bichette 232pa, .329babip, .319obp, 127wrc+
4.DH Hernandez 241pa, .349babip, .325obp, 134wrc+
5.C Alejandro 69pa, .286babip, .348obp, 142wrc+
6.3B Biggio 344pa, .304babip, .360obp, 115wrc+
7.RF Grichuk 324pa, .300babip, .318obp, 116wrc+
8.LF Gurriel 306pa, .327babip, .324obp, 115wrc+
9.2B Semien 343pa, .252babip, .300obp, 90wrc+
PH Tellez 190pa, .260babip, .305obp, 101wrc+
IF Panik 183pa, .291babip, .328obp, 81wrc+
C Jansen 196pa, .155babip, .269obp, 55wrc+
IF Espinal 86pa, .371babip, .318obp, 86wrc+
OF Davis 60pa, .241babip, .305obp, 84wrc+
OF Palacios 35pa, .318babip, .353obp, 83wrc+
Do you mean 2020+2021? That's quite a small sample.
Hard hit balls on the grounds or popped up are a good outcome too.
He gave up 2 HR on sliders last time, so I don't mind if he throws fewer of those.
Also, the defense is often better when there are few baserunners and the hitters don't go into deep counts.
J.A. Happ was the same type of pitcher when he was successful with the Jays.
Mostly fastballs. Hit it if you can. Happ had problems with some teams who could field 9 right bats.
He still won 20 one year.
Ray is nothing like Ryu or Matz who mixes 4 pitches.
I'm less confident that Kay will be able to fare well in an all lefty rotation.
I guess they want Thornton to pitch to more than 9 batters, but they still don't want him to face Acuna/Freeman/Ozuna/Albies more than once.
I imagine Sandoval could DH, but the Braves don't have a ton of left bats.
Chuck I would be supportive of the Jays keeping Panik
for being left-handed, if they didn't also have Rowdy Tellez currently on the bench. Panik has inexplicably DH'd at least once this season already, maybe twice, I'd have to check. To me that is ridiculous.
I also agree that Espinal is not an everyday infielder, but he sure deserves the spot over Panik.
Of course, at the moment you might say that Panik is really here because he's hitting more than Tellez, and has far more defensive utility.
One option with Espinal is to platoon him with Biggio at third, and use him as a late defensive substitution when appropriate. Biggio could act as a supersub the rest of the time and thereby play 80% of the time.
To me, Panik is a perfect pickup for a team whose second baseman has hit the DL, they need a guy to make starts for a month without falling off a cliff. He's not a guy you keep around as a utility infielder/bat off the bench when you're competing in a meat grinder of a division like the AL East. There is far more value and upside in making use of (like grjas just pointed out) a Biggio-Espinal platoon.
Anyone remember the Matt Stairs era in Toronto? His role as a 1-2 start per week/power lefty off the bencg was very well managed by John Gibbons and Cito Gaston. If Rowdy can be a little more selective at the plate, this would be ideal for both player and team.
Agreed that Espinal is a better bench option than Panik. More versatile, better defensively, and probably just as good offensively. It’s not like Panik is a platoon option either so him batting LH is essentially meaningless. If he mashed righties then that would be different but he doesn’t.
Pitching for the Braves: Ian Anderson, Chris Martin, and Will Smith. Two lead singers plus a rapper. (Anderson is the only starter, so he must be the frontman.)
Stairs started more often than that - 89 times in 2007 under Gibbons, and 89 times in 132 games the following year under Gibbons and Gaston. If the opposition was starting a right-hander, he was usually in the lineup.
So, more like 4-5 starts per week.
I'm not sad to see Roark go, but I'm still bothered by the fact that they seemingly have no plan to try out any new starting options in the near future despite a stretch of 16 games in 17 days.
Tbf, there's not much left on the farm. But part of the problem is not calling up Anthony Kay when the exception was allowed when Ryu was placed on the IL and instead calling up yet another generic 10th one-inning reliever.
Announcing Travis Bergen as your Sunday starter after a bullpen day Saturday is madness. They'd better let Trent Thornton pitch to more than 10 batters next time out.
Soy capitan, soy capitan
Bamba, Bamba.
Stairs was definitely supposed to be an occasional start, bench off the bat. I think that was indeed the plan. But he turned out to be the best hitter on the team. And he was a 39 year old DH on a team that had signed Frank Thomas during the off-season. Stairs played some outfield, which he played like you'd expect from a 39 year old DH. He played a bit of first base and it turns out you cann't stretch that far for a baseball when you're 5'9....
Bamba, Bamba.
OK, I'm gonna need a footnote. A gloss. Something.
Right past me, that went!
I googled it. And the lyrics came up.
Meanwhile, Espinal can play any of three infield positions competently and without drama.
This year may be his chance to prove his worth.
And I am also going to be watching for the performance of Otto Lopez. He offers many of the same attributes, plus an ability to play outfield as well.
Versatility rocks!
I thought the Richie Valens song reference translated to "I am captain, I am captain, bomb, bomb", referencing the 2 bombs he hit last night. The first line translated correctly, but bomb in spanish is bomba, not bamba. I will have to brush up on my Spanish, if I ever learn Spanish.
I am now de-confused on the mountain thing. Apparently there are Bamba mountains in both the Himalayas and the Congo, if Google is to be believed.
Reminding myself that Richie Valens spoke about as much Spanish as I do.
Because park factors are built in, both the Jays .233/.307/.398 and the A's .214/.301/.378 are exactly 100.
And then there's the Tigers - .199/.257/.345 for a 70 wRC+.
One little mentioned positive in April was our baserunning. After ranking 30th, 24th and 22nd the past 3 seasons, Jays finished April as the #1 ranked baserunning team in MLB.
My original point: Panik and not Rowdy should be the odd one out. Having a big scary bat off the bench is valuable.
Didn't say this at the time, but if the Jays were so skeptical that Espinal couldn't be an effective utility infielder, why not bring back Freddy Galvis? He's Joe Panik with a better bat.
Afternoon game after catching nine innings? Kirk will get Sunday off. He might pinch hit.
Also, Otto Lopez is already on the 40 roster. He's 22, Espinal is 26.
Espinal is an infield utility player.
Lopez is a super-utility who can play outfield as well as shortstop.
Scouting grades
Espinal Hit:50 Power:40 Run:55 Arm:55 Field 55 Overall:45
Lopez Hit:55 Power:45 Run:55 Arm:55 Field 50 Overall:45
Looks like Kirk has graduated from Prospects.
No longer on MLB Pipeline lists.
Their manager must be wondering: "What have I done to deserve this?" :) Couldn't resist.
Kirk catches Ray.
2 bullpen days. Makes sense to have Kirk handle Thornton and Jansen handle Stripling if that's really the plan.
Today, Semien gets the day off.
Panik at 2B. Biggio at 3B.
That adds credence to keeping Espinal up and DFA’ing Panik. The Jays are covered in the event of injuries.
Springer is the long term vet. Panik is there to add maturity because the team leans young.
In a couple of years, the only maturity they'll need is at DH if Tellez doesn't become more reliable.
They'll always need young guys ready to step up at AAA.
And of course, they still want to have some left bats that they can throw in there.
More like Brantley than Panik though.
The Blue Jays not only gave Panik the roster spot out of Spring Training, but gave it to him despite him being thoroughly outplayed by Espinal. The logic is probably due to options, but a bad decision is a bad decision. Thankfully they chose Kirk over McGuire.
If veteran presents are what Shapiro wants, why not find a decent veteran catcher to platoon with Kirk?
It's really puzzling.
116.4 mph... 470’
— Ben Wagner (@benwag247) May 2, 2021
4 7 0 FEET.
Calling up Juan Graterol or Reese McGuire would require a 40 man roster move.
Springer doesn't look 100% but clearly can still hit in spite of that.
On the other hand, George Springer comes as advertised. He's going to add some swagger to the Jays lineup. Maybe we'll win a bunch of 9-8 games.
He's clearly not 100%.
Hip injury?
They didn't want to sign Walker for multiple years.
They probably thought that Hatch and Pearson would get more starts.
I'm not hot on Stripling either but maybe he can hover a 5 ERA.
14th round pick in 2019. They sent him to pitch in Australia during the pandemic where he had a crazy 17 K/BB ratio.
Other option I see is resigning Ray or Matz, graduating Manoah and SWR and signing a cheaper free agent like Bundy or Gausman. Then spend on an IF like Story, Seager, Correct or Semien again.
Amongst Canada's Kings: George the 5th was the Second King of Canada. George the 6th was the Fourth King of Canada.
King George IV wears number 4. Canada's New Original King.
Anderson, Martin and Smith I'd take on my pitching staff, but as a musical trio, that's ghastly.
Also, Jansen goes for the dubious 0-fer record today, assuming he plays.
Stripling is starting today so I assume he will take Millone's roster spot but which catcher will be added?
The guys available from the pen today are Mayza who only threw 3 pitches, Castro, Payamps and Tice, Borucki (25 pitches on Friday, not a good outing).
The Braves also have to make a roster move at catcher as D'Arnaud in going on the IL. Last week the Brewers lost both catchers and now Luke Maile is their starter. Things change fast.
Last year, they got Walker for Roberto Rodriguez.
I would be shocked if they traded a top 10 prospects for a rental.
If they want to sign someone long term, Ray is a better fit than Scherzer and the Mets are not trading Syndergaard.
I heard they were interested in Kevin Gausman before he took the QO.
They paid a higher price on Stripling, precisely because he was not a 1 year rental.
The Catch-22 with calling up McGuire is that the next time you send him down, he gets to declare free agency if he clears waivers after his DFA.
So there's no great time to call up McGuire if you want to keep him in the organization, bar a season-ending injury, because he has to stay on the MLB roster from here on out.
They’ll likely need a solid inning eater type at the deadline which hopefully they can get somewhat cheaper.
McGuire can be added and kept around until after Kirk returns. D Jansen can be demoted to work on his hitting.
The game starts at 1 so a decision should be announced soon.
It does give the Jays time to think about other options, either from their system or elsewhere.
Having to use Kay today would not be good except maybe for one quick inning.
Thanks to the Box for opening registrations, been a long time lurker.
Baby steps.
Now the big challenge - catching up to Jacob deGrom.
Told you I'd be bringing the mockery. Hey - so far it's working.
Buck is a baseball player.
They have to start stretching Thornton out more. They haven’t even left him in for 3 innings yet. I know they’re being careful given last year’s health issues but baby step increases would be nice. I’d like to see what he can can do as an SP as well
yeah guys like Semien, Grichuk, Gurriel really get to shine down in the order where their power really plays up.
But I really, really, really think they should flip Bo and Vlad in the order. They're just going to stop pitching to Vlad completely, and anyways he's the elite OBP guy, not Bo. Meanwhile, it'll be far harder to pitch around Bo with 2 elite OBP guys getting on base so much ahead of him, and the bats of guys like Teoscar being closer to Bo's level than Vlad's.
His streak started after a 6th inning single against Charles Nagy on May 20th, 1994 in a 2-0 win against the Indians. He would later be issued an intentional walk in the bottom of the 8th against Nagy again in his final PA.
His hitless streak ended on June 1st, 1994 in the bottom of the 2nd with a HR off Todd Van Poppel in a 9-5 loss to Oakland.
It doesn't look like Cito benched Sprague at all during his streak, as he started every game and inning of the streak and never was lifted for a pinch hitter.
During the streak he was walked 4 times, once intentionally. He struck out 12 times. He did not reach on any errors, or earn any sac hits or flies. He was hit by a pitch on May 31st, the penultimate day of his streak. He earned one RBI and scored one run.
I don't remember Ed Sprague's historic streak, but it seems Cito paid next to no attention to it at the time.
Be glad when the Jays are out of Florida. Very disconcerting to hear louder cheers for for the opposition than the home side.
The lineup is starting to look deep.
I like Hernandez behind Guerrero.
A long as Vlad scores some run, it's all good.
It looked like he tweaked the quad last night running down to first, but stayed in the game and hit two hrs after. Today in his first AB he stumbled a bit coming out of the box, but stayed in for a couple more ABs.
Springer is up and walking around in the dugout. He went down, smiling to congratulate Phelps on his inning too. #bluejays pic.twitter.com/Tk0188oITu
— Ben Wagner (@benwag247) May 2, 2021
I also think Hernandez will come around and protect VG, but if he doesn’t sure switch around with Bichette.
With luck they are just resting Springer to be safe. Otherwise, Biggio is back in lead off.
1. CF Grichuk
2. 1B Vlad
3. SS Bo
4. DH Teoscar
5. C Kirk
6. RF Grichuk
7. LF Gurriel
8. 2B Semien
9. 3B Biggio
As for the top 3 other than Ryu I don’t think they’re an injury concern. Ray and Matz have a fairly good record of being healthy. We just really need one of Pearson or Thornton or Kay to lock down that four spot. If they can give a 20ish ranked prospect for another mid season Walker type that’s cool too but don’t touch the good prospects.
Hey, I had no idea registration had been blocked. It’s great seeing some new posters!
I was really happy when I saw Newcomb coming out.
Weird move by the Braves manager.
Newcomb didn't look that bad 2 days ago.
The Jays shelled him.
So, I wouldn't throw him back in there for more abuse against all those right handed hitters.
I don't understand how a runner walks between first and second after running through first.
That Gurriel sand swimming move. :)
Semien is getting ready to go back to Oakland.
I would imagine that Springer doesn't want to be off that trip to Houston either.
The pen is not in a great spot though.
Phelps, Chatwood and Borucki have been used back to back and should be off.
Borucki probably gets a day off too along with Payamps.
That leaves Romano, Mayza, Tice, Bergen. Thorton might be the long man now but could probably use another day off.
Wonder if it was Vlad who caught the fact or did the 1st base coach? Danny seemed just standing with the ball and Vlad suddenly started pointing. Ah, who cares? Let the narrative be it was Vlad, because I can't spell the 1st bases coaches name.
I would guess that Palacios and Tellez also travel with the team as well as a 3rd catcher - maybe Juan Graterol?
Life is good!
You know, if there's a chance to take advantage of an old friend when he's in a jam.
Biggio and Panic can play the outfield for a game.
The minors starts on Tuesday and they probably want Palacios, Davis and Tellez to play full-time.
Panic is the emergency catcher and has been taking balls at first.
Pearson and Zeuch should be starting in AAA. (Are they in Buffalo?)
Luciano is pitching in New Hampshire with Moreno catching.
Groshans and Otto Lopez are also there.
Would you be shocked if the Nationals traded Scherzer for a prospect outside of the top 10? I know most people trading that type of game changing talent would want a return similar to what David Price fetched. Norris, Boyd + the idea you can get a top notch starting pitcher (rental or not) for outside top 10 prospect talent is ludicrous. When I say trade for a player it means someone better than our internal options. Walker type pitcher is not an improvement. Look at the trade for Carlos Carrasco as a reference. I don't think the Jays make a trade for any pitcher not as good or better. So expect serious talent going the other way.
For short term it would be someone like Syndergaard who is coming back next month. He's throwing 100 and has the track record. Difference maker.
For a longer term trade it would be for someone like Sonny Gray, Castillo, Marquez, Flaherty, etc.
FYI Syndergaard is in a walk year and probably the best available SP free agent coming up since Bauer likely won't opt out, Kershaw won't leave the Dodgers and Scherzer...maybe he's a wild card. Greinke is done...
Jansen's streak on the other hand lasted from April 8th to May 2nd due to a combination of a weird April schedule full of off days, routine off days as a catcher and Kirk working exclusively with Ray.
If they go for that sort of trade it will have to be a Stripling+ deal where they make a trade for a pitcher with 2-3 years left like the ones you mentioned above. That waste of trade capital during multiple trades is part of what led to our window being so short since we had nothing coming up to back up the 2015 team. Heck wasn’t their reports of AA and Shapiro disagreeing on this type of trade? So yeah don’t be disappointed when we don’t trade for Scherzer. Trying to think of the last time the Dodgers traded top prospects for a rental and I’m coming up short there.
I expect mid-season minor trades - guys #11-30 on the prospect list could be traded, but a top 10 only for a guy who would be here for 2022 for sure. No rentals unless cheaply acquired. I could see the Jays taking on salary mid-season to help cut the cost down on a guy too.
1. CF Grichuk
2. 1B Vlad
3. SS Bo
4. DH Teoscar
5. C Kirk
6. RF Grichuk
7. LF Gurriel
8. 2B Semien
9. 3B Biggio
Kasi, I don't read Stoeten, can't stand the arrogance (blocking his readers back in the day).
I would expect to give up someone with really high upside lower down like SWR was given up for Stroman, or someone higher up with less ceiling, like the guys I mentioned.
Shapiro and Co will definitely make a big move, maybe two moves. They have been consistent in saying they will have depth as well as waves upon waves of prospects.
Jays are top 3 in spending money during the past 2 years BTW, after the Yankees and Nationals.
I think they bring in a rental this year in SP category and I think they try to sign or trade for a big SP in the off season. That would give them a Championship caliber core for half a decade and allow them to focus on building up the future waves ala Dodgers and Rays via savvy trades and drafts.
I was at that game too. One of three games I've been to when the Jays broke up a no hitter in the 9th. Best was May 1989 at Exhibition Stadium, Key vs Langston & Mariners. Jays not only broke up the no hitter (a perfect game except for Junior Felix getting on base by an error), but they won it. Last game Jimy Williams ever won with the Jays.
The other wasn't a real no hitter. It was the last spring exhibition game in 1995 at the Dome vs Mets. Mets used a few pitchers.
Never saw a no hitter, but I did have a ticket for the game (1991??) when Dave Stewart no-hit the Jays. Changed my mind that afternoon, and gave it to a co-worker.
Anyway I have no issue the Jays giving a top ten prospect or two for a young stud pitching prospect or young guy with term. That’s cool and I’d be behind it depending on the players involved. But rentals no and I don’t think the Jays will trade prospects for rentals. They want to be like the Dodgers who as well hoard their prospects. You don’t have a good team if you constantly bleed prospects for short term upgrades. I don’t think it’s all that necessary since I really do think Manoah was the best pitcher in his class and that Pearson and SWR will be solid eventually. CF and 3b are still holes and one of Groshan or Martin I think could a lot in there.
Um... but it is what you said. When you compared it to the Price trade. Wherein the Jays gave up their #1 prospect.
Norris was clearly the #1 prospect coming into 2015 (followed by Pompey and Aaron Sanchez), and was very comparable to where Pearson / Martin / Groshans are today.
Top 100 Ranks:
BA MLB BP Pre-2015 Norris 18 17 34 Pre-2015 Pompey 30 43 42 Pre-2015 Sanchez 27 44 25 Pre-2021 Pearson 14 10 35 Pre-2021 Martin 19 22 22 Pre-2021 Groshans 34 46 41
Batter's Box top 10 for 2015.
Empty the farm and wish for the best.
The current building strategy is the complete opposite, so the Price trade doesn't really fit.
The Josh Donaldson trade was amazing.
It's too bad the Jays didn't get full value because of health reasons.
With Price, I mostly remember the games he lost and the win he stole from Dickie in the postseason.
The basis for the Price trade was Stroman getting hurt during PFP and missing most of the year.
Without the Price trade, Hendriks trade probably doesn't happen either.
The Jays don't have a long term answer at third base yet.
There are still questions at many other positions.
I expect them to be active in free agency but not trade for rentals just so they can overpay for an extension. They can just extend the guys they already have if they want to.
If anything, maybe something like the Mark Lowe trade might be all they need.
Both the Jays and Yankees are 7-3 in their last 10. However the Jays have played against tough teams and the Yankees have faced Baltimore and Detroit.
I do think that there is a difference between young posters and new posters that are a bit older. Wise posters that have experience constantly see improvements and declines in players. They also see prospects fail on a regular basis. I see decline and failure now and expect it because it is a part of player development. The history is not lying.
My Jay's prospect love has changed in its "elite expectations".
He went as himself only. "
Roy Halladay is a Blue Jay in the Hall of Fame. Not having a hat in the picture doesn't change that one bit.
Regarding Norris, I feel people just get defensive when you have to give up something good. Acknowledge that giving up no or cheap prospects will get you back middle of the road pitchers or reclamation projects at best. If we're going into October and want to compete with the best teams, the pitching will need to be addressed, simple as that.
Look at what San Diego gave up for Snell. Patino is at the same level as Pearson, maybe a tick below, maybe. That's the price for controllable bonfire pitching.
I would appreciate it if posters protesting the trade of quality prospects for starting pitchers of the top 20 variety...if you could share how the team would improve the pitching. Is it the view that, "Pearson, SWR, Manoah will improve our rotation, we can resign Ray and we have Ryu?" Is that your view? Because I don't like that plan at all...so many holes in it.
- SP: Ryu: signed through 2023
- SP: Stripling: arbitration for 2022
- SP: only prospects otherwise under control beyond 2021
- RP: Dolis: enters arbitration for the first time next winter (!) this is due to years in Japan
- RP: Yates, Chatwood, Phelps all free agents
- CA: Jansen/Kirk both under team control for many years
- 1B: Vlad: through 2025
- 2B: Semien: just this year
- SS: Bo: through 2025
- 3B: Biggio: through 2025
- LF: Gurriel: signed through 2023, arbitration 2024
- CF: Springer: signed through 2026
- RF: Hernandez: arb through 2023, then free agent
- OF: Grichuk: signed through 2023
- DH: Tellez: through 2025 at least (a month in the minors adds a year of control I think)
In the end, a player can only represent one team, or none at all.
Never building a championship team around him was a colossal mistake.
I think we can all agree on that.
Heh, bonfire pitching reminds me of the Joey Mclaughlin experience - also, Joey Hamilton comes to mind. So I guess my point is, the Jays may want to stay away from pitchers named Joey.
I agree Leaside Cowboy. There's something about Vlad's swing that reminds me of Manny.
Montreal gave up a "not" top prospect Randy Johnson and a little more for a good SP that did not take them over the top.
Houston got Verlander which helped immensely. Probably a good package going to Detroit. Verlander was extended.
Bauer to the Reds. Rental for "not enough time to judge". Were they high prospects?
D Price for a strong package.
E Loiza for M Young. Loiza lived up to his abilities. Young surpassed his prospect status.
Many other trades that I cannot remember.
Jays getting D Cone was for a championship. Cone and Ricky Henderson were acquired in trade. Morris, Winfield etc.. were FAs. This was to extend a closing window.
There is an old saying that means "I don't know what". "The team getting the best player will most often win the trade". Probably a basketball saying.
I completely disagree with this line of thinking.
That said, the Jays are in a tricky spot. It's hard to see what things will look like at the deadline. If Ray and Matz fall back to earth and Pearson continues to struggle in the rotation, another SP becomes very attractive. But without expanded playoffs, it's hard to imagine the above scenario without also being on the outside looking in for a playoff spot and so maybe not in the rental market anyway. And vice versa, I feel like if we had a comfortable spot it would mean that our existing pitching actually kept rolling and so I'd be tempted to leave it be.
Kirk trying to prolong his career. This is also part of the High Performance Department.
The Happ trade was never a good one and turned out to be a total bust. It got mocked and still does at times. Yet no one blames Rogers for the trade. Jays or Atkins gets the blame and rightly so. But the Jays are part of Rogers.
In the same way, the training staff is part of the HPD. Yet when the training staff has a perceived failure, some blame the HPD rather than the trainers, just like blaming Rogers for the Happ trade.
As a side note, someone brought up Stoeten. He's done the HPD mockery in the past, although his new site is where I found the above Kirk link.
That's why Alomar will never be removed from the Hall no matter what he does after of how he becomes viewed later.
And choosing no team is not the same as choosing multiple teams.
It only makes the player appears selfish and I have not doubt that this is not what Doc would have chosen.
It's like being buried in the family plot.
You can't be buried in 2 different places just because you divorced and remarried.
You can choose one empty grave or 2 empty graves but not 2 full graves.
I'm not the type that leaves flowers on empty graves.
But Shapiro I believe was also helped greatly in hindsight by AA's go-for-it moves. I wanted to put 2015 success in quotes, because it both was and wasn't. Would Dodgers or Yankees fans have thought trading so many prospects to not even make the WS a success if their team had done it?
But the Jays had been wallowing for decades. The true long term success of 2015-2016 seems showing Rogers that Toronto can be a large market thanks to the 3 million+ fans that showed up to the RC for multiple seasons. A Springer-type signing was an impossibility for AA, because of payroll parameters from Rogers (also Beeston's 5 year rule which is gone, thank goodness, under Shapiro).
What I would do is trade a lower prospect or two for an inning eater pitcher at the deadline if they are still in contention, not a top 10 talent or more for a top tier rental. It’s too early for that IMO. As others have pointed out, the team while looking promising has too many holes for an “all in” move. If they can make the playoffs this year and get some additional postseason experience that’s a bonus and may be they can win a series or two. The WS is a big stretch this year, even with a big deadline addition.
Next year I’d throw a lot of money at a good multi year pitching talent if they can sign one. They’ll also have a better idea by then of what to do with Bichette, when and where Groshans, Martinez and Martin will play, and have a better view on their catching situation. Some of these areas may also need investment.
Maybe it isn't funny - maybe it's a lesson to be learned about the value of "top pitching prospects".
And remember - Thor wasn't actually that highly rated when we traded him. In the 90s on two lists and not rated on the 3rd in the rankings before we traded him, though he did jump into the mid-100s the rankings after we traded him.
And lastly, in response to a post about Springer hitting the ball right at people, I suggested hiring Willie Keeler as batting consultant. I am sad nobody Smithers-ed my idea.
Unless they're your team's prospects. Then they're gold, Jerry, gold.
Vladdy has become a great player 6 years later. That's not short-term. Who are the other players who were then in the system that have made an impact? Tellez, Borucki, Davis, Mayza and Jansen? That's a bunch of bubble guys not a core of a team. The core of the Jays' team aside from Vlad was all brought in by Shapiro/Atkins almost all as free agents/trades because the system was bare for so long. Shapiro was absolutely right about the state of the system. It was almost empty of talent. You can look at Pipeline's top-30 prospects after the trade and it is bad. Harris, Pentacost, Alford, SRF, Urena, Greene, Nay, etc...
I was pretty firmly against including Syndergaard at the time. It seemed like far too high a price to pay for a one-year acquisition of an unusual Cy Young award winner. Syndergaard seemed to be an unncessary inclusion.
IIRC, Syndergaard may have been a back-end Top 100 guy at the time, but he was always a high-variance Top 100 guy. He was a flamethrowing high school pitcher, and more often than not those guys wash out, but the ones that hit can be front end starters, at least for the period of time they hit. They are a different type of bottom-end Top 100 pitcher from the safer mid-rotation type: kind of like the difference between Mick Abel and Nick Lodolo this year, for example.
Of course teams need pitching prospects of both varieties, but I didn't like trading a lottery ticket in that deal.
I also didn't like the Matz deal, so I'm usually wrong.
eh, i'd say the instnat change in hype had much more to do with the jersey than the stuff.
some of us most definitely were - though in my case that was because i much preferred trading the more highly rated Sanchez who never had the stats rather than trading the younger Thor with the super elite stats.
AA didn't decimate the farm system, he sold high on some of the prospects, most of whom flamed out/became fringe major league contributors at best (much worse quality than what came back). There was still talent in the farm system post trade, and there wouldn't have been that much more talent if he hadn't made the trade. We were not going to be a top 5 farm system even without the trade.
And true we were not going to be that high without those trades. That is mainly because after that Thor/etc draft where he gamed the system AA didn't really draft well. We had unsigned first rounders and a collection of disappointments. Kinda crazy that Stroman was really the only pick that worked out. Then you got duds like Harris, Smoral, Pentecost, Davis, Smith Jr, Deck, Jacob Anderson, etc.
The Jays weren't going to be a top-5 system even without the trades partly because how badly the team drafted the previous few years but top-5 is a high bar anyway. There were 2 major issues with those trades. 1) Jays sold high on prospects for short-term players. So none of Hoffman, Norris, and Boyd turned into stars, but the Jays traded them for half season of a starter and a few seasons of one of the worst contracts in baseball. The Jays traded away 3 top-100 prospects and got negative long-term value back. 2) The Jays traded so many prospects from 2012-2015 that they didn't even have small pieces to fill in. We take for granted that Espinal or Kay or any number of prospects can be called up and we can see how much the Jays need that. In 2015 and 2016 when they were supposed to be contending, the Jays had absolutely no pieces to call up and no prospect depth to trade from. The Jays got extremely lucky with pitcher injuries in 2016 because no starters got hurt. Any pitcher got injured, Jays were screwed because they didn't have anyone who could pitch in the majors. AA did a lot of good with the Jays but the absolute refusal of some people to see what a mess he left the Jays with is baffling. Trading Thor doesn't bother me because he turned out great, it bothers me because trading top prospects for a 38 YO pitcher when you are coming off a 73 win season is stupid and ended predictably badly. The Marlins trade didn't bother me because they traded top prospects but because they traded a ton of cheap valuable assets for old, overpaid ones. AA kept trying to go all-in and that simply wasn't sustainable. Baseball is all about building a sustainable team and AA was way behind the times there. (And he's clearly grown in Atlanta although oddly enough, in Atlanta, I think he should do more consolidating of his assets and he's show a real reluctance to trade prospects despite having a top system.)
A.Kay (26): 38.1ip, 5.87era
S.Espinal (26): 86pa, 85wrc+
yeah the suggestion that this is some kind of valuable depth that the 2015-16 jays couldn't match is....funny.