Ah whatever let’s just light up Chapman. That’s even better.
Good game, gotta play better.
Taking a 0-2 fastball is not so good.
Cole threw breaking stuff to everyone the first time around and got hit a bit .
He then went primarily with the fastball and make quick work of everybody as they were timing the breaking balls.
Then, he seemed to read bats and throw what they didn't want to hit.
Still, I think I saw that movie before, the one that stars Higashioka.
Gotta get a better scouting report on him.
Sad that Kirk is cast off in McGuire's role of the backup catcher who can't hit at all.
Ray looked good and maybe they win that match up the next time around.
He didn't get the corners and many times had to come in the middle of the plates to avoid walking guys.
Dolis is coming around nicely.
Thornton was standing side by side with Stripling, two guys who could be switching spots before too long.
I would have liked to see Palacios try to bunt his way in, but they played the corners in on him.
Obviously, they have people watching every games.
An other thing, there's way too many Yankees fans in Dunedin.
That doesn't feel like home at all. I liked it better without attendance.
I hope they overcharge them.
Just as Tennis was unwatchable before they went digital, getting the calls right is always the right choice.
I even support replays. They still have issues (I will readily admit) but they are on the right track.
I am entirely in this camp as well. You want zest? You want fallible humanity? The players are there to offer that up by the bucketload. I want no humanity from the arbiters. I want perfection.
Agreed. If you're going to use replay, use it to get the call right. That means ignoring entirely the call on the field and starting from scratch to assess what occurred. This business about overturning the call on the field means that poor calls that are most likely incorrect, but not incontrovertibly so, do not get overturned. What purpose does this serve? Assuaging the umpires' feelings?
Worse 3 calls, Chapman to Tellez, O'Day to Panik, Cole to Bichette.
It looks more like a team bias than a pitcher bias.
The Diamondbacks vs Atletics game favoured the A's by 1.78 runs. That's huge.
-0.77 against Arizona and 1.01 for Oakland.
Let's talk about the ones doing things right.
Pat Hoberg and Todd Tichenor had a 99% consistency last night.
Jim Wolf, Greg Gibson, Andy Fletcher, and Jerry Meals, 98%.
Even Angel Hernandez had a 97% consistency and only impacted his game by only 0.29 runs.
As Scottt pointed out, there are good and consistent umpires, but the human element means you're going to have some bad ones, too.
I watched lots of it anyway, but it's so much better now. For sure. I do not miss the tantrums of McEnroe and Nastase.
But tennis is easy. The lines are drawn on the court. They don't move and they don't change. The strike zone isn't just flexible - it's subjective. It's entirely reasonable for two individuals to stand behind the catcher and see a two different strike zones.
... the upper limit of which is a horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the uniform pants and the lower level is a line at the hollow beneath the kneecap.
It changes from batter to batter, and sometimes from pitch to pitch - because it is "determined from the batter's stance" and batters can and do change their stances in mid at bat. If we really have the technology, fine. But it's much more complicated than tennis.
Not only did the call screw us but it ruined a great battle with 2 outs in the 9th with the tying run at the plate.
It was the entertainment loss that was the worst part.
Is there a part of Tellez's stance in which his knees come 6 inches from the ground?
The top of the zone is rarely a point of contention and when it is, it's because it's not constant.
A pitch is a ball. A higher pitch is a strike.
It's a bit more complicated than tennis, but not much.
Hitter have a stance, they load up before they swing but the strike zone is determined from the stance.
Tellez was standing still on that call because the ball was nowhere near the strike zone.
I'm glad Roark is no longer in the rotation.
Odor and Bruce tonight?
Basically the same lineup for Toronto. Just swap Kirk for Jansen.
North/south perhaps, but not east/west.
That’s the issue. It’s similar to the debate over changing the application of the centre red line in hockey. Purists hated the change, but the game is infinitely more entertaining. The human factor for umps is not the slightest bit entertaining IMHO. Just annoying.
Jeez I Iike Ryu. composed, consistent and competitive. Best Jays pitcher since Halladay, and it’s not even close.
In 2020, an admittedly odd year, there were 20 CGs, 12 of which were non-shutouts. That was ~900 games. So far this year there are 2 CGs, both shutouts (one no-hitter!), in ~155 games.
Missed what happened to Phelps...injured mid-inning? That's ominous.
The broadcast is raving about Vlad Jr’s throw, and it was good... but I like Jansen’s headiness throwing behind the runner way more.
Awesome game otherwise. Ryu made the Yanks cry like babies. I love watching him pitch.
Josh ‘a coyote ate my glove’ Palacios looks like a player
That was obviously a beautiful and successful defensive play to the end the game and its just brutal that the ump could ever have thought it wasn't.
I get this is subjective, so if a bad call ruins your enjoyment I can’t argue against it. I won’t say a bad call doesn’t bother me, but not enough to want to get rid of the umpire. I'm watching an entertainment, and the umps are part of the theatre. You still need someone to throw out Rougned Odor don't you?
That's how it is today, but there's no reason it has to stay that way. It could be defined purely as a function of the player's height - i.e. the bottom of the zone is 14 inches + 5% of the batter's height, the top is 40 inches + 10% of the batter's height. You'd want to calibrate those values to correspond to current averages, and obviously no matter how you do it there's going to be batters who suffer or benefit due to having unusual stances. Pitchers and hitters would adjust accordingly, and complain accordingly. That's no concern at all compared to having to anticipate the failings and whims of a human umpire on every single pitch.
To change the subject, I'm wondering how soon Anthony Alford will be hitting the Waiver wire. He should have a long leash because Pirates, but even tankers cut bait on the Socrates Brito types eventually.
23 PA's, reached base 4 times - 3 BB, 1 HBP. Put the ball in play 4 times - 2 GB outs, 2 FB outs. The other 15 PA's all K's. That's a 65% rate. None of the other 282 MLB'ers with 20 PA's so far is over 50%.
The Yankees complained a lot but Ryu was mostly just hitting the corners.
Taillon does not appear to have a lot of command.
As long as the obvious bad calls are overturned, I don't mind those.
It's early, but the review judges appear better this year.
The Yankees infield defense is bad.
Urshela is good at 3B and Lemahieu is fine but third isn't his best position.
Sanchez has lots of issues, Bruce isn't really a firstbaseman and Torres would fit better at second.
Odor stinks defensively.
Phelps has a back contusion.
Merryweather has some left hip discomfort.
Maybe one or both go on the IL so they can recall Payamps.
Hernandez has tested positive and will probably miss long enough to need some rehab.
Springer appears to be targeting an April 27 return.
Lack of consistency was only in the top of the zone.
Strike zone was generous on both side.
3 worse calls: Ryu to Frazier, Taillon to Guerrero, Ryu to Sanchez.
Montoyo seems to always be late with his lineups.
Kirk and Panik in today?
Stripling has some forearm tightness.
The Jays have multiple days off over the next two weeks, it seems like the pitching staff needs them.
The Jays will need a starter tomorrow in KC. Roark back in?
Well, he gave us 4.1 innings. So maybe not the new Henke?
He does seem to have no idea where fly balls are going, which are deep and which are not. Also, his new thing is to say "this may go for extra bases" when someone pulls on obvious double into an outfield corner.
Zeuch needs to go back to the minors and figure out how to throw a pitch that can reliably cause whiffs.
As discussed in another thread, if he's going for a Buehrle-type career, he'll need exceptional BB and HR rates to counter the low K rate. That's not happening so far.
He and Donaldson seem to be having a contest to see who can spend more time on the IL.
Merryweather seems like a heart-breaker. So good when he is healthy. Just never healthy. I hope things break well for him, but I wouldn't want to bet money on it.
I think it's because Rivera was telling/signaling him no to slide at third.
Rowdy is starting to hit the ball hard consistently. A good sign for him.
One man's folksy charming is another man's reach for the mute button because this idiot is just killing me.
"AHA! I TOLD YOU that the shift hurts as much as it helps!"
Every time.
If it were me, when everyone is healthy, I would run Springer, Biggio, Bichette and Vladdy as my top 4. There are reasonable cases to stack the non-C bats in practically any order after that.
Think it was yesterday he did make a comment on the shift, in that the pitcher can't lay a ball on the outside edge where the hitter would naturally go the other way into the vacated area. I have heard other announcers not seem to understand that and just complain about a "good pitch" going for a hit because of shifting.
Agree with uo Semien shouldn't hit leadoff. Problem has been a combo of Springer's injuries and Biggio not getting on base enough to warrant a change, although he seems to be coming out of his funk the past few games.
Thornton would be fine starting if he threw fewer balls.
Is he getting more velo from being in the pen?
If he is, I'm not remembering his starts.
Any 4 guys with big OPS in the top 4 is fine.
It's way too early to be down on Semien.
Before the game, he was still third in bWAR as position player.
I like Biggio before Tellez. Palacios is a nice surprise.
It's great to have another left bat.
.500 feels great.
Yankees drop to 5-7 and are playing Tampa next.
It would be a good time to beat on weaker teams.
Need to find innings for Milone and Roark.
I'm pretty sure that, unlike most of us, Buck has watched far more games in person than he has off a TV screen.
"Dan Shulman will call games from a studio in Toronto, with either Martinez or Tabler offering the analysis from their homes. That means Sportsnet broadcasts will unfold in four different locations, with one production team on-site and the other in Toronto, and with the play-by-play voice and colour analyst working separately."
"Both commentators have access to several different camera angles. They can see what the viewer sees at home, and they can also access a broader view of the stadium, as well as the bullpen (so they can see which pitchers are warming up) and the scoreboard, among others.
“It’s not the same as being at the ballpark,” said Corte. “But we try to give them as many angles as possible so they can see as much of the ballpark as they normally would.”
1. CF Springer .359obp, 146wrc+
2. 3B Biggio .363obp, 117wrc+
3. 1B Guerrero .361obp, 128wrc+
4. SS Bichette .323obp, 125wrc+
5. DH Teoscar .323obp, 130wrc+
6. LF Gurriel .329obp, 117wrc+
7. RF Grichuk .324obp, 115wrc+
8. 2B Semien .302obp, 94wrc+
9. C Jansen .296obp, 73wrc+
PH Tellez .302obp, 103wrc+
IF Panik .333obp, 81wrc+
C Kirk .282obp, 78wrc+
1. CF Springer .359obp, 146wrc+
2. 3B Biggio .363obp, 117wrc+
3. 1B Guerrero .361obp, 128wrc+
4. SS Bichette .323obp, 125wrc+
5. DH/RF Teoscar .323obp, 130wrc+
6. LF Gurriel .329obp, 117wrc+
7. RF Grichuk .324obp, 115wrc+ / DH Tellez .302obp, 103wrc+
8. 2B Semien .302obp, 94wrc+ / Panik .333obp, 81wrc+
9. C Jansen .296obp, 73wrc+ / Kirk .282obp, 78wrc+
I guess they haven't heard the governor saying that Texas has already achieved heard immunity.
br> See, that's the problem. They needed to achieve herd immunity and they settled for a bit of gossip.
Sorry. (Hey, I'm responsible for some of the greatest typos in Box history...)
We might actually see Pat's face more on the road.
I trust you've learned your lesson! :-)
Judging the flight of the baseball at the ball park is a weird thing, though. I remember in my youth going to the Old Ex several times a year. Someone would send a fly ball soaring into the sky, we'd all "oooh" and "aaah" - and an outfielder would trot in and make a casual catch 100 feet in front of the wall. I quickly learned that if I wanted to know how well the ball was hit, the thing to do was not to watch the ball but to watch how the fielders reacted. Because they generally know.
But once I started seeing more games in person, and especially from watching them always from the same seat, I didn't need to look at the fielders at all. I could just tell, all by myself. (But if I was somewhere else in the park, I was just as lost as ever.)
But I've watched many more games on TV, from the omnipresent centre-field camera. And I don't know if anyone else can confirm, but I swear there have been a number of times when I knew a home run had been hit before the camera even cut away. Just from watching the swing, and the contact, and the sound of the ball. There were certain hitters when you instantly knew when they'd caught one just right.
The first one was a mistake pitch.
He was missing high on many of the pitches to the first hitter.
He left one breaking ball over the plate for Judge.
I think he was scheduled to go tomorrow and that might have made things harder for him.
His ERA is up to 5.56. Kluber's is up to 6.10.
The second one wasn't so bad. Judge is a good low ball hitter. It's best to crowd him inside.
I don't see Stripling as a loss.
Pearson is supposed to be pain free and ramping up.
I'd like them to bring him and use him as an opener while he ramps up.
Matz-Kay-Ray-Ryu, will they go with 4 lefties against KC?
Go Jays though! Hope the roster doesn't get decimated by COVID now, and that they find a few workable back-end rotation arms.
Oh yes, big bad Jim. What a strange legacy. Until the recent induction of Harold Baines, Rice had seemed to become the poster boy of Hall-of-Famers-who-don't-really belong. Because while he was actually active he was absolutely the most terrifying hitter in the American League. For years and years. I used to shudder when he came up to hit.
I suppose it was the zillion GDPs that put the kibosh to his overall value. Maybe that was the lineup. He was hitting behind Boggs and Evans. Every time he came to the plate, there was a guy on first and probably less than two outs. And Rice hit the ball very hard and didn't strike out that much for a power hitter.
The Atlantic League is going to test out moving the mound back by one foot this season, so that combined with the rule changes they will also be testing out in the minor leagues, I think MLB is going to make some significant changes within the next few years. It's badly needed. The increase in K's and decrease in BIP is very bad. It seems to have gotten much worse this season due to whatever they did with the baseballs.
I don't know if that's actually the case, but I trust The Athletic enough to believe that news was accurate at the time of reporting and something changed.
There was a shot of them before the game today, sitting side by side with plexiglass between them. And they are probably vaccinated. In Florida, I believe vaccinations are available for everyone.
362 AB into their season, the Cubs are batting .163 and have struck out 122 times. They are not 0-12, as one might guess. They are 5-7.
Well, they're obviously not just hoping things turn around on their own, since almost all the league has talked about lately is changes to the game, one of which being trying to get more contact and balls in play. There are a bunch of new things being tested out in the minors this year, and supposedly the league is going to start cracking down on illegal substances in the majors sometime this year. And just today it was announced that the Atlantic League (where previous rule changes were tested in the past) will move the mounds back a foot in the second half of the season to test that particular variable.
Which also happens to be the original game of baseball.
Also nice to see Taillon and Kluber get hit around. As much as the Jays really need Ray & Matz to provide some good starts behind Ryu, the Yankees are also looking real thin if they can't count on Taillon & Kluber behind Cole.
This has been done before, of course. Baseball hasn't moved the mound in a very long time (128 years ago it was moved back about five feet.) It does seem like it could be time to do it again. The pitchers are bigger and stronger and throw a little harder today than in 1892. And logically, doesn't it seem as if the mound should be located in the actual centre of this otherwise symmetrical diamond?
Yup, 63 feet, 6 inches. We can do it in stages - say 6 inches a year until we get there.
We still need to do something about all the hitters holding the bats down at the end, whipping them through the zone, and uppercutting everything. I still think a minimum size on the bat handles are the thing.
The other sports tweak their games relentlessly if it produces better entertainment, but baseball always has to be dragged kicking and screaming out of the distant past into something resembling the recent past.
We still need to do something about all the hitters holding the bats down at the end, whipping them through the zone, and uppercutting everything. I still think a minimum size on the bat handles are the thing.
Bill James wrote about this 20 years ago in his New Historical Baseball Abstract. Bats now are so thin and whiplike. Having a minimum thickness of the handles (and maybe a minimum weight) might help.
The other sports tweak their games relentlessly if it produces better entertainment, but baseball always has to be dragged kicking and screaming out of the distant past into something resembling the recent past.
This has annoyed me for a very long time. There's a kneejerk reaction among so many baseball fans to any proposed change, even if it's badly needed and would improve the game tremendously.
Also, the mounds will be moved back in the middle the season. Will the pitchers have trouble adjusting.
Will this lead to more pitcher injuries? It's a bit crass to experiment in a league where pitchers don't make that much money.
They will also use the hybrid DH. You lose the DH as soon as you pull the starting pitcher.
This is to try to keep starters in the game longer instead of using 5 or 6 relievers per games.
Neither the starting pitchers nor the relievers are going to hit. This actually creates opportunities for bench players.
What's not to like? Guys like Stanton not getting enough AB?
Exceeded 45 days on an MLB active roster?
https://dailyhive.com/toronto/records-broken-matched-blue-jays-bo-bichette
That's nice but I'll be more impressed when he breaks franchise records, either for a season or the cumulative ones.
Tellez had a great streak too one September.
Tough for Montoyo.
Romano and Dolis were pretty good last year.
They Jays passed on Bass and A.J. Cole--for now--because they had other options.
The loss of Murphy is significant for me. He looked pretty good.
Phelps is a nice extra to have.
Hopefully, Chatwood is not gone too long.
Borucki and Mayza are good left handed options and Bergen is on the 40 and ready to have a shot at it.
Same for Payamps on the right side.
Castro looked pretty good yesterday, but he's not actually on the 40.
While challenging, it is a good challenge to have it be tough for the Jays to cut guys from the 40 man, there have been times in the past when guys on the 25 could've been cut and no one would've taken them (that horrid 1994-2014 stretch had many times where that was the case).
Bo Year 1: 212pa, .368babip, 142wrc+, 5.2war/650
Bo Yr 2+3: 181pa, .355babip, 137wrc+, 5.8war/650
A player on the Covid list does not count against either the 26 roster or the 40 roster.
I couldn't find a Covid waivers exception, but that doesn't mean anything.