https://bluejaysnation.com/2018/06/25/joel-sherman-lists-more-reasons-why-j-a-happ-to-the-yankees-makes-sense/
#GrandyHighPerformance
"Curtis Granderson: Sixth player ever to homer multiple times off Justin Verlander in same game. Previous was BAL J.J. Hardy on Jun 1 2013.
Others (here's a list): Desmond Jennings, Shelley Duncan, Carlos Quentin, Nick Swisher."
However I am handling it better this year.
It will be interesting how they extend their window of contending. I think it will be a whole organization commitment.
Money quote:
"Estrada has been one of the better starters in baseball over the past month, accumulating an even 1.0 fWAR over the past thirty days — something only ten other hurlers in the game have accomplished. In his last four outings, in particular, he has worked to a 1.75 ERA with 26 strikeouts against five walks."
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/06/trade-candidate-marco-estrada.html
The problem with someone like Estrada is that it's hard to see any team wanting him as a playoff starter. It's too hard to trust a pitcher who has been this uneven over the last 2 years. I could see him having value to a team wanting a starter to help them make the playoffs (Seattle?) but there won't be a huge market. Happ is a top pitcher and teams will bid on him.
And there are other playoff contenders with dreck at the back end of their rotations.
However, it should also be noted the main reason they have fallen back was the 10 game stretch of Red Sox-Yankees-Red Sox they just completed.
officially not toast.
Jeez I hope not. The Jays are not making the playoffs this year. If by some miracle they beat looooong odds and actually do it, they'll be the road team in the play in game. This is not worth passing up the chance to help the 2020 and beyond Jays. They'd better be selling the rentals for sure.
That's my worry as well. Time to lose a few and dash those false hopes.
"Josh Donaldson (calf) has suffered a setback. He will be re-evaluated again in 3 weeks."
A bunch of guys were going to get rich beyond belief this off-season. The now health-addled Donaldson. The slump-ridden Harper. The brittle, opt-outable Kershaw (still owed 70MM for the next two seasons, so maybe shed no tears).
Machado seems set for a big fat paycheque, though BR has him on pace to be just a 3-WAR SS whereas FG sees him around 5, despite this being the best he's ever hit. A return to 3B would restore his status as top shelf superstar and I imagine that's where the quants would urge their organizations to return him.
If Donaldson never returns to form for the entirety of this season, does he get offered a QO? If so, would he accept?
This would have been unthinkable even a short time ago. But yeah, the possibility now is non-zero.
Sure he is, Buck. Sure he is.
Pretty good start.
Donaldson won't be back before the trade deadline. A QO is pretty much automatic.
The odds of making the playoffs without him are slim to none.
The Jays can still play some very good baseball even if the results are meaningless.
The stuff is different though. He threw the change for strikes on occasions.
The fastball seem to have some lateral movement and he got lots of long fly balls from the end of the bats.
He pitched around Altuve (3 walks) and Breggman? got him for 3 doubles I think. He would have only given 1 run if not for a wild pitch/passed ball.
The defense was solid behind him.
changeup was in the 82-84 range so that's a nice gap too.
how did his curveball look?
To me, the fastball had more of an horizontal tail than a standard 2-seamer, but he hardly ever missed over the plate. He painted a lot of corners with both fastball and changeup. I found myself saying "nice pitch" on 2-3 consecutive offerings several times. The thing is that he hides the ball well and seems to pitch effectively out of the stretch.
Also I learned that the Jays have the most balls in the dirt on throws to first base with 35 or so.
Ryan's father's minor league career was mentioned in the previews on Ryan in both:
2017: https://www.battersbox.ca/article.php?story=20171025162554363 and 2016: https://www.battersbox.ca/article.php?story=20161108161543517
I didn't check further back than that.
You knew Osuna was a criminal and the solution was to trade him?
- good command of the fastball and excellent composure on the mound
- the changeup still needs some finishing- I would be very happy to see him spending a lot of time with Marco Estrada
If Trump knew I'm sure others knew too!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=42&v=3gLAE11oSYY
http://www.brooksbaseball.net/landing.php?player=621366
"Pitch Repertoire At-A-Glance
Ryan Borucki has thrown 95 pitches that have been tracked by the PITCHf/x system in 2018, all of them occuring in the MLB Regular Season. In 2018, he has relied primarily on his Fourseam Fastball (92mph) and Change (84mph), also mixing in a Slider (78mph).
BETA Feature:
Basic description of 2018 pitches compared to other LHP:
His fourseam fastball has heavy sinking action, has an obvious tail, has essentially average velo and results in somewhat more groundballs compared to other pitchers' fourseamers. His change is an extreme flyball pitch compared to other pitchers' changeups, has a lot of backspin and is slightly firmer than usual. His slider (take this with a grain of salt because he's only thrown 6 of them in 2018) is basically never swung at and missed compared to other pitchers' sliders, has exceptional depth, results in more flyballs compared to other pitchers' sliders, has short glove-side cut and has below average velo. "
What a silly statement - players get hurt/diminished performance - I wasn't the only person to advocate moving Osuna & donaldson - the Jays weren't contending (only pretending) & you trade away assets that can speed up your rebuild & unlikely to help your next window of contention - it's why the Phillies traded Cole Hamels, the Cubs traded Samardzija & Hammel,Rangers traded Teixeira etc. I wish people would think for a minute before trying to be cute with their post.
Our odds were almost 4 times better than the Mariners. Doing a sell-off in a situation like that would be a kick in the face for season ticket holders.
https://www.fangraphs.com/standings/playoff-odds?date=2018-03-28&dateDelta=
The Jays were projected for something like 85 wins this season, which would usually put them in the wildcard race.
In the last 3 seasons the last wildcard team had 85, 89, and 86 wins.
might as well settle in for the long lazy river tube ride.
I don't see this team getting weaker the rest of the season unless Sanchez is injured and one of T Hernandez or Grichuk gets hurt.
If Donaldson, Stroman, Tulo and Sanchez come back healthy this team is much better. We don't know what will happen about Osuna when his suspension is over.
Happ and Estrada will bring us something. We probably keep Garcia. I cannot see us trading anyone that is good and healthy now. The big loss to the team will be Happ. He probably cannot be replaced.
I am sort of hoping that Granderson and a few of the bullpen arms get traded so that a few kids can come up.
lmao. what a rat.
This trade deadline looks like it will be getting rid of the expiring contracts (Happ, Estrada, Granderson, Pearce, possibly a reliever or two, etc). All of them are performing well to varying degrees so the Jays should be able to get some value. Too bad Donaldson won't be part of that group. Well, he might be, but time is not on his side.
I'll be interested to see if they consider moving someone like Pillar or Smoak. Neither one figures to have a ton of value right now, and there's no one in AAA waiting for 1B or CF to open up (Alford has been a huge disappointment) so maybe not. Pillar is someone who was always going to lose value the older/more expensive he got. Defensive decline, especially on turf with the amount of flying around he has done, was inevitable.
how is the team not clearly better served by trading solarte when he might have some value?
if we can get a half decent prospect for Solarte next month - do you want us to make that trade or not?
I honestly don’t know how you interpreted that as me unfairly praising the FO. Strategic in this case means we are going to see a bunch of Morales, Solarte, Pearce, Garcia, etc, types fill big league holes until prospects take over. The FO clearly wants a team full of young position players at some point. This is just a means to get there without a scorched earth approach.
I’m glad I’m not the only insomniac on this forum but I think you’re arguing for no reason here.
Solarte might fetch a bit more because of the 2 potential years of control, and it being the teams decision whether they keep him or let him walk.
But depends on whether there is a contender with the need for him also. Hard to be a seller if there is no buyer.
He's not particularly cheap at about 5M a year. A contending team probably wants a better player and might just need him as a placeholder while dealing with injuries. I don't expect a huge return.
The front office raised the floor over the winter. Should they lower it now, just to get some fringe prospects who are either long shots or who won't find room on the 40 roster?
Clearly Pearce and Granderson should go to contenders to free more time for Hernandez, Grichuk and a rotating 4th outfielder.
Tellez hasn't earned a promo, so no reason to shop Smoak. They do have 2 catchers who look ready in AAA and nowhere to play them. Would be nice to get something for Maile and move Martin to super utility.
It will be interesting to see what they do with Alford. There's a lot of center fielders out there who don't hit a ton. Pillar hits for .300 for month but always seem to end the year hitting .250. Should they move Pillar if they get a good return? Or is there a difference between Pillar and Solarte? They do have a lot of defensive center field options, even if they lose a bit on offense.
and what's the objection to the scorched earth approach again?
and why can't the jays sign some cheapo FAs to fill gaps when needed?
and yeah "strategic rebuild" still sounds like you trying to make non-optimal FO moves sound smart.
According to you two years ago, it was because Shapiro inherited a gold mine of old players that were never going age and easily contend for years to come, but the real answer is probably something only Rogers can answer. They should have rebuilt after 2016, but after two straight ALCS appearances it was never going to happen. Now it's likely not necessary as long as they maximize the value of their key assets since Vlad and company are likely a half season in 2019 away from being in the bigs.
The FO acquired Solarte to be a cheap placeholder. He was acquired for the equivalent value of a cheap placeholder. Not sure why you'd think other FO's view his value any differently, but sure if another team does, then pull the trigger. However, 1) I don't think another team will value him that highly, and 2) the cheap remaining years of his deal were a big reason why he was acquired in the first place. I don't see a trade happening there unless another team overpays.
"and why can't the jays sign some cheapo FAs to fill gaps when needed?"
You threw a fit when they signed Granderson for 1/5, so not sure why you're suddenly trying to convince others who have had no issues with signing cheap FA's the last 3 years of doing exactly that.
"and yeah "strategic rebuild" still sounds like you trying to make non-optimal FO moves sound smart."
If you say so.
and Yangervis is having a much better year than last year, and probably would return more than we gave up for him.
but that's besides the point - I don't know why you do this pre-emptive defense-laying for any move this FO makes, even when it's clear you don't want them to make those moves.
The only agenda rearing it's head in this debate (which appears more an investigation by you into SK) is your consistent raking of the Shapiro front office. You're the one accusing other posters of defending this FO which implies they must be defending from someone...fans and posters like yourself are who they are defending against. You're basically trying to put a poster in a corner here even after that poster has clearly stated what was already obvious (even though he shouldn't even have to validate or be questioned for his opinion).
You've had a chip on your shoulder since AA was canned and always looked at what the FO was doing and rallied about going the opposite way, even if they've switched from one extreme (signing Bautista big money) to another (signing Granderson $5 million).
For me the good news is that the FO likely will choose middle and unscorched, but their wording may be open to interpretation.
There are posters who reflexively and preemptively set up arguments to defend moves that they obviously don't agree with.
This is my 2 cents about 2020. Tulo is not a young prospect on the farm. If he is still here his salary is $14 mil. Some may think/have suggested that we need SPs for 2020 to bolster Stroman and Sanchez. I agree and think 7 is a good number. 3-4 from the farm are reasonable. I would hope that 5-6 will be given the opportunity to succeed or fail. So far Biagini, Gaviglio and Borucki are/have been getting the opportunity. I don't expect all 3 to be in the 2020 rotation. If I am right, I am shocked. On the negative side, not to discourage anyone, that looks like a weak rotation at the moment.
might as well settle in for the long lazy river tube ride.
No doubt. It's not like this front office has had any success with a lower payroll.
You just keep on doing this. Do you ever get tired of being wrong all the time?
Just curious.
2016 was a good year regarding injuries especially to our rotation.
Can Severino (NYY) and C Sale (Boston) be this lucky the next 3 years. I can see injuries happening to our direct rivals.
AA guys - Tulo, Martin.
S/A guys - Grandy, Morales, Pearce, Happ, Estrada, Oh, Axford, Clippard.
The stars from the 2015 team have a combined 2018 WAR of 2.3. That's Donaldson, Martin, Tulo (hurt all year), Edwin, and Bautista. The highest from that group belongs to a player that couldn't get a big league deal all winter (Bautista with a surprisingly solid year). Anyone who wanted the team to double down on this group post-2016 should be thankful the FO did not listen to them.
the history of the Blue Jays most supports which of these approaches, do you think?
I think he should consider 3B, 1B and DH. If he can hit well then he will make good money, one would think. Due to injury, he cannot run or throw very well. I would guess hard and accurate throwing is difficult with that shoulder. I don't know how much his hitting is affected.
I sure hope shapkins thank Lacava every day for that.
24-32: 171gs, 104era-, 105fip-, 107xfip-, 11.0awar, 2.1awar32
30-32: 75gs, 103era-, 100fip-, 103xfip-, 5.4awar, 2.3awar32
33-35: 73gs, 79era-, 88fip-, 93xfip-, 9.2awar, 4.0awar32
pretty remarkable to see a career turn around at age 33.
Washington, Cubs, St Louis, Arizona, LAD and SF all have recent winning experience. Their teams are made up of players who have had recent success.
Philadelphia, Atlanta and Milwaukee don't have many of those types of players. Some trades and FA signings gave them a few.
I am happy that AA got a 2nd chance in Atlanta. I decided to follow Atlanta because I am curious and I think AA has potential. IMO it is crucial that he does something to strengthen his team this trade deadline. Winning will help him keep his job.
For where the Jays were after 2016, 'going for it' was not a sensible option. So you could argue that not rebuilding after 2016 was a bad decision, and it might have been given the value lost by keeping Donaldson in particular, but again that leads back to ownership green-lighting a rebuild after two straight ALCS appearances. Rogers wanted the Jays to contend in 2013 after they lost 90 games in each of the previous two years. I don't think rebuilding is something they ever want to do, much less after the revenue/ratings they got from 2015-16.
Build a good young core first, then supplement them with free agents and trade expendable surplus prospects in trades. That's essentially how the Jays should build the team, and that appears to be where they are trying to go. That is where the Shapiro regime will be put to the test. Trying to prolong success after 2016 by continuing to 'go for it' would have been a disaster.
I can't help but think that Atlanta is ahead of schedule as far as winning goes. The team is riding lots of over-achieving, both among the hitters and the pitchers. I expect Washington to snap out of its funk and pass the Braves, and I would expect that AA, and his bosses, will still be pleased with this season even if things go sideways in the second half.
Or find a pitching coach of similar calibre.
The only thing that really sticks in my craw is that Shapiro himself said last year that we needed a rebuild, but the fan base 'demanded' we try to contend. That's some serious BS, and borderline inexcusable if true. Leaders are supposed to make tough choices. Shapiro is just too PR oriented for my tastes, although frankly I took that comment as pure spin. Or, to put it less kindly, a total lie. Which, ironically, is better than the alternative.
Walker’s been around a long time, and has he really made a difference? New blood would be fine with me
I thought AA really hit his stride in his last year as the Jays GM, with moves like Donaldson, Martin, Travis, Smoak, Estrada, Price, and Tulo to vault the team into serious contention. The irony, though, is that he didn't quite go all-in enough in his last year; he apparently declined to trade for Zobrist at the July 2015 deadline. That move might have made the difference between a WS championship and an ALDS title.
At the same time, even if I don't much care for the new corporate tone and obfuscatory PR, I mostly respect what the current front office (which, it should be noted, still has LaCava on board) has done so far. I like that Shapiro is establishing more of a collaborative, process-oriented approach with bright minds in a variety of roles across the organization, and that they're trying some new things like the HP department and overhauling the spring training facility. There have been a number of positive surprises from less-heralded players on the farm this year, which suggests that the front office may be on the right track in terms of its drafting and player development approaches.
The Jays were always going to take it on the chin in 2017-19. That was simply the price for the two straight ALCS appearances, which I don't think anyone would take back. The Jays could have won a World Series in one of those two years, so regardless of how short the run was, the objective (making the playoffs) was met.
When you look at where the farm system is now, how much flexibility there will be around the time Vlad and co. will be called up for good, and the amount of solid value deals on the roster (aside from Morales, Tulo, and Martin), I don't see how anyone can complain about where the team is. They smartly avoided the mistake of bringing the same crew back after 2016, put a lot of money into player development, have gotten good reviews for their drafting, made sensible trades where the talent coming in usually far exceeds the value going out, etc. They aren't perfect, but the team is in a good spot long-term.
I think it's pretty easy to look back and see how fortunate the Jays were for their 2015-16 run and for having a FO smart enough to pivot in 2017-beyond when the situation called for it.
I present the Russell Martin All-Star Team.
Russell Martin 212 PA, .168 BA, 0.1 WAR
Jarrod Dyson 222 PA, .181 BA, 0.1 WAR
Matt Joyce 216 PA, .198 BA, 0.1 WAR
Joey Gallo 312 PA, .190 BA, 0.5 WAR
Mike Zunino 204 PA, .191 BA, 0.7 WAR
Kolten Wong 216 PA, .196 BA, 0.8 WAR
Gary Sanchez 265 PA, .190 BA, 1.3 WAR
Scouting Report: Undersized, athletic middle infielder. Right-handed hitter with a contact-oriented swing. Starts in a slight crouch with an open stance. Loud hands pre-pitch. Two-hand finish. Short swing, direct to the ball. Fringe power potential. Improving pitch recogniton and selection. Average speed. Fluid in the field with above-average range to both sides. Does a good job closing on the ball and plays angles well. Smooth actions, soft hands. Potential above-average defender. Average arm strength. Professional debut was delayed due to a left-hand injury. Signed for well below slot of $157,200. Participated in 2016 Fall Instructional League.
Espinal could be a late bloomer. He went to Miami Dade Community College and was drafted in 2016. Then, as mentioned above he had an injury so this is his second season.
- good command of the fastball and excellent composure on the mound
- the changeup still needs some finishing- I would be very happy to see him spending a lot of time with Marco Estrada
The changeup has been Borucki's bread and butter's pitch even before he was drafted 7 years ago. He's widely considered as having the best changeup in the Jays system. He has the same arm action on both pitches.
People like Jamie Moyer throw 78mph sliders. That's a fail and likely a curve at that speed. Re Borucki pitch classification.
Also a separation of 14 mph is insane for fastball VS slider. That would be all over the internet prospect analysis.
Borucki's slider is still a work in progress with varying shape and pace. The hitter can tell right away that's it's something else, so he needs to get it in the strike zone or close to the outside corner for it to be effective. His arm slot isn't conductive to throwing a curve, like Estrada's or Biagini's. His fastball tails.
We could have used a guy like that--with better bat skills than Ngope--while Diaz was on the bench. .314/.364/.478 slash with seven home runs and nine steals over 280 plate appearances. Better than nothing.
"Santiago Espinal, 2B/SS, Boston
Espinal appeared among the Next Five portion of last week’s edition. In the seven days since, though, he’s strengthened his case for inclusion here, recording an isolated-power mark of .370 while striking out in just three of his 29 plate appearances.
Selected out of Miami-Dade College in the 10th round of the 2016 draft, Espinal signed for just $50,000. In light of his diminutive stature, Espinal doesn’t appear to offer much projection on the power. Indeed, entering the season, he’d hit just four homers in over 600 professional appearances. Through just 133 plate appearances of the present campaign, however, Espinal already has five.
As is the case with many player to demonstrate this kind of improvement in the majors, Espinal is hitting many fewer batted balls on the ground. In fact, his ability to avoid both the whiff and ground is tops among players at High-A:
In addition to these promising indicators, Espinal also add defensive value, having made all 29 of his starts in the field at shortstop, where he receives fair if not excellent reviews from the advanced metrics."
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-fringe-five-baseballs-most-compelling-fringe-prospects-107/
http://www.soxprospects.com/players/espinal-santiago.htm
Toronto also sends some cash in the deal.
Steve Pearce becomes the 2nd player in recent memory the complete the "AL East cycle" (play for all 5 teams) following Kelly Johnson.
If the suggestion is that Pearce was traded for someone to replace Warmoth while he's out, that suggestion is ludicrous.
My thinking also, CDC. What need? Jays system was already overflowing with MI's.
However, if he was a truly an org player from Toronto's perspective, why would they have included cash in the deal as well as opposed to trading him for a 24-year-old pitcher with a high ERA in low A and just pocketing the savings?
I know it's a buyer market, but it seems a little strange than the best the Jays could do was to save something like half of Pearce's remaining salary and get a non-prospect in return. Which makes me wonder if there is someone in the front office who like Espinal more than the consensus.
I challenge the existence of this 'rage' meme. It does nothing to further the discourse. People can disagree without rage, and I recognize the irony of this coming from me ... I'm working hard to distance myself from 'raging'. But review this thread. No rage in sight. The worst we get is someone calling an opinion 'ludicrous', which I'm not a fan of, but clearly doesn't qualify as rage.