Maybe Dan Shulman.
I didn’t know English had evolved so far, however, that a single cube could now be referred to as “a dice” though. I suppose anything is possible. Whatever.
Too bad about Pompey. He just can't stay un-injured.
Maybe Dan Shulman.
Truer words cannot be said about the 2018 Blue Jays.
Everyone's favourite cutting edge thinker and Chatty Cathy doll, Mr. Martinez, then answers: they were hitting a lot of homeruns earlier but not so many recently.
Which is an answer, of course, but to an entirely different question (Are the Blue Jays hitting a lot of homeruns?).
Despite their recent woes, the Jays' 713 OPS (the AL average is 734) is still broken down quite favourably:
- 787 OPS with men on base (40% of total PAs)
- 660 OPS with bases empty (60% of total PAs)
Their offense has been, overall, the benefactor of clutchiness. Things could continue to get worse as that flattens out.
Are there any publicly available stats on attempts/success rates?
I'd almost be tempted to let him try to squeeze in one more inning against the bottom of their order.
What I meant is that the gap between their OPS's with men on base and without would likely shrink, presumably one number rising and the other falling.
The league split is 749/726 (men on/nobody on). The Jays are at 787/660. They are doing disproportionately well in the highest leverage situations. This is surely chance and not a skill.
Based Empty: .240babip (50-55 points below league median)
Runners On: .311babip (7-8 points above league median)
Oh, I agree. An argument could be made that the expectation is that the team's 660 will increase far more than the 786 will decrease, resulting in an increase to the overall 713 OPS and likely to the R/G as well.
I'm just saying that the current 713 OPS is a "loud" 713 because the crazy constituent 787/660 split has resulted in more runs than could be expected. That answers Shulman's original question.