The Twins are in Yankee Stadium, and a pair of first inning homers off Luis Severino have driven him from the game and staked Ervin Santana to a 3-0 lead. Which he promptly surrendered by putting the first hitters he saw on base and giving up a three-run home to Didi Gregorius. This could be a wild one, folks.
The Twins are in Yankee Stadium, and a pair of first inning homers off Luis Severino have driven him from the game and staked Ervin Santana to a 3-0 lead. Which he promptly surrendered by putting the first hitters he saw on base and giving up a three-run home to Didi Gregorius. This could be a wild one, folks.
In other news there are 4 Jays on the Northwest League top 20 prospects. And Nate Pearson did not qualify.
As you would expect Logan Warmoth and Riley Adams made the list. But Kevin Vicuna and Reggie Pruitt also snuck in, grabbing the last two spots.
I hate to pick against Joe Madden, but it certainly looks like a Dodgers / Nats NLCS to me.
I'm pulling for the Astros in the Series. The Yanks and Dodgers fans have enough to be happy about. Does anyone still follow the Nationals due to the Expos connection, or is that too far gone?
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-yankees-are-overwhelmingly-powerful/
"The Yankees threw 171 pitches in last night’s game, and Statcast had the average velocity of all their pitches at 93.1 mph. That isn’t their fastball velocity; that includes every breaking ball and off-speed pitch they threw. If we exclude all the bendy pitches, the average velocity of a Yankee fastball last night was 97.1 mph. The Twins didn’t throw a single fastball that hard all night."
wow.
Chad Green actually beat Miller in fWAR (2.4 vs. 2.3) but Miller has the killer track record. And the Indians starters are historically good.
What do you think of the decision to start the fully-rested Kluber game 2?
Anyways, over the last 3 years, Miller has struck out 42.5% of RHBs he has faced and Judge does strike out more than the average RHB, so you'd probably be looking at about 45% K, 15-18% BB and about 7.5% HR.
I like to throw a few shekels on a team each year, so I went with the Red Sox at +900 this year. Looked like the best value to me. Hoping Sale shakes off the late season "struggles" and that Price is an effective weapon out of the bullpen for Farrell.
I still say the Indians win the series, but the Yankees have a chance.
Except Cleveland also added Clevinger and Salazar to the bullpen which makes their long-relief better than the Yanks I think. This is actually the most interesting playoffs in some time I think and while it felt like for a number of years, there was a lot of mediocrity in baseball, this year every team in the playoffs is good and most I would classify as great teams. You look at the playoff teams and you don't see a lot of weaknesses anywhere. Boston is probably the worst team left in the playoffs IMO and they won 93 games this year.
1. Cleveland - Ending the suffering of one last fan base, now that the Cubs and Red Sox have been relieved. Besides... Edwin and Tito. Easy call.
2. Washington - The franchise has never won a title, Bryce Harper is loads of fun, and a Nationals championship would punch Dusty Baker's ticket to Cooperstown. Watching all the heads explode after that would be worth the price of admission.
3. Houston - Another franchise that's never won a title, Jose Altuve is loads of fun, and it's a terrible time for the city.
4. Los Angeles - I could rank them higher, despite all the past Dodger titles. They're just a fun group.
5. Arizona - I don't much like the team, but I don't mind cheering for Paul Goldschmidt. And Greinke.
6. Chicago - Another fun group, but they won it last year. Sorry.
7. New York - Weirdly enough, this group of Yankees doesn't give off the same stench of money most Yankees just exude. It's the kids you think of - Judge and Sanchez, obviously. And I expect Greg Bird to join them. Oh, I'm going to hate those guys so much. Just not there yet.
8. Boston - I do like watching Rat Boy play baseball, him and the wonderful young outfielders. But mainly - I smell money, money, and more money.
And Verlander delivers - finally - the first Quality Start of the 2017 post-season.
Nice job by the Astros to snag Verlander at the waiver trade deadline, too.
They all got lit up except for Price. That's kinda amusing.
I wonder if a sweep gets Farrell out.
Still can't believe we can't get that channel here out west.
Therefore I am very happy with the Jays. Stroman & Sanchez were pretty good in the playoffs. Even Estrada and Happ gave us enough to win. Not great by any of the 4. IMO we have some key playoff ingredients.
Santana - 2 IP, 4 ER
Severino - 0.1 IP, 3 ER
Gray - 1.1 IP, 4 ER
Greinke - 3.2 IP, 4 ER
Sale - 5 IP, 7 ER
Verlander - 6 IP, 2 ER
S. Gray - 3.1 IP, 3 ER
Bauer - 6.2 IP, 0 ER
Pomeranz - 2.0 IP, 4 ER
Keuchel - 5.2 IP, 1 ER
Sabathia - 5.1 IP, 2 ER
Kluber - 2.2 IP, 6 ER
Walker - 1 IP, 4 ER
Kershaw - 6.1 IP, 4 ER
Hendricks - 7 IP, 0 ER
Strasburg - 7 IP, 0 ER
These playoffs may be a game changer in terms of the elite teams building elite bullpens for the playoffs.
For the WS, it sure looks like CLE, HOU and LA are the faves at the moment. I like the Stros - I get tired of the same teams winning year after year, and refuse to cheer for Cleveland, even with EE, given that racist name and mascot.
He hit very well, but it was only the team's numerous injuries that caused him to start 25 games in the outfield. That was certainly not their plan from the outset. He was supposed to be a pinch-hitter and caddy at first base for Zimmerman, who was coming off a down season.
Truth to be told, I see a bigger gap between Boston-NYY and Cleveland Houston than between the Jays and the top of the division. Of course, things could look different in April.
Houston is a team I've lightly cheered on since the mid-80's when they nearly beat the Mets in 1986 thanks almost entirely to one pitcher, Mike Scott. The Mets in game 6 looked desperate to avoid a game 7 vs Scott. A heck of a playoff year even if the Jays didn't come close.
LA has had a long WS draught for a big market team - no appearances since 1988 despite making the playoffs 10 times plus this year in that stretch. Random odds say they should've been there twice with one win in that stretch.
LA-Houston would be a fun WS imo. Just no Boston/NYY ALCS please or Cleveland going all the way.
vs LHP 37
vs RHP 281
2017 Nats Lind PA's
vs LHP 32
vs RHP 269
Does anyone see defense as very important in the playoffs? I mean that if the SP makes a couple of mistakes and the defense bails him out.
So offense has the least value, IMO. Sorry WAMCO.
I think Sportsnet used to pick up the MLB Network playoff games until MLB Network started to be shown in Canada (on Rogers at least) in 2014(?). I think though in 2015 that Sportsnet picked up the Jays-Rangers MLB Network game called by Bob Costas.
My oversimplified point is simple - that how a team is comprised is largely for style points, The best chance they have is simply being better than their opponent.
No bad pitching here, at least.
Nice to see both teams down 2 games to none rally - keep beating the drum for great postseason ball Bpoz, I'm with you.
Happy Thanksgiving folks!
If the Red Sox and/or NYY get knocked out then over 2015,16 and 17 the Jays fans had more to celebrate than their fans.
Something to be thankful for.
Too much stupidity in the commentaries, though.
Pierzynski about the necessity of hiding signs on the road, because at home, you'd need a guy in the crowd.
Like they do in Toronto. Except they are home and Boston is the team stealing signs.
Of course, this whole originated with the White Sox and didn't stop when Rios went there.
Beltran's home country is Puerto Rico? Is that the right way to say that?
And who was the only manager old school enough to allow that? Joe Maddon. Wait, old school Maddon? Wasn't he the cutting edge guy in Tampa with all that shifting?
Well, yeah, his Tampa teams did shift more than other teams, but apparently this year his Cubs shifted less than any other team.
Interestingly, Hickey is no longer the Tampa pitching coach at least partly due to disagreement over decreased starter/increased bullpen usage dictated from above.
Its interesting how a 12 man pitching staff becomes a six or seven man staff in post-season.
Well, some can do it. But maybe there was enough history to avoid starting Bauer there. I thought the point was keeping Kluber in his regular slot. So either way you're starting someone short. Your general point isn't wrong. There are tradeoffs for all their decisions. Potential benefits to playing Kipness in CF are all offense. It's good that Cleveland pitchers all strikeout a ton of guys because they aren't nearly as good at getting grounders as I thought.
Kipnis is playing CF because Zimmer is injured.
But now I believe in the Jays. The 20 year playoff drought would not have happened if there was a 2nd WC.
As many have acknowledged "playoff baseball" is different. So I want the Jays to build a team to win in the playoffs.
My team would have good SPs, a defense that can steal a few runs rather than give them away. A decent bullpen, which gets a starter or 2 added to it in the playoffs. I sacrifice offense. Also I hope Our manager/Gibby is playing "you be the manager".
Playoffs - different creature. Super short leash on everyone. Pinch hit without worrying about hurting a players ego, even use rookies for that purpose (Ed Sprague, Derek Bell) when vets were on the bench. Run for guys (Derek Bell for John Olerud - OK, anyone would've done that), play them out of position (Molitor at 3B when he hadn't played there in over a year) to maximize your chances.
In the end it worked well, 2 WS wins after he was super angry at the end of 1991 when they were knocked out in the first round (just 2 rounds back then) by a team many thought the Jays should beat (Minnesota).
After that post season the Jays signed Morris to a (then) record setting deal (around $10 mil over 2 years) to take him away from Minnesota (he had a players opt-out).
For me, here is one of the very few times I DO root for the Yankees. The less of Cleveland's racist iconography that is shown, the better.
Let's see an Astros/Dodgers World Series, please.
I hope it's less. Bo and Vlad Jr's ETAs for the majors looks like 2019. With the system getting stronger and and developing, I'm hoping the Jays can look like this year's Yankees team by 2020.
Of the 3 teams it seems a certainty that we will be 3rd in the FA signings.
IMO the Jays will also be 3rd in # times we win the division in this 3 team contest.My bad is that I just put down Bo and Vlad.
IMO both the NYY and Twins deserved to lose this years WC game. So at worst the Jays are as good/bad.
So far only LAD, Cubs and Houston can be pleased with the way the playoffs have gone. IMO.
How??? Yankees won 15 more games and had 28 more Pythagorean wins this year. They scored one run a game more and gave up 0.7 runs a game less. They had the third highest WAR for position players and second highest for pitchers. Jays were 29th and 11th respectively. They have more money to spend, more and better major league ready prospects, and are simply, a younger and much more talented team.
Barring Ohtani coming to the Jays, and maybe even then, I doubt anyone will predict the Jays to finish within 5 games of the Yankees and I think most will have the Yankees around 90 wins and Jays around 80. It's possible of course, the same way the Twins fluked a playoff appearance this year, but it's a very unlikely outcome.
The Yankees have six starters in their everyday lineup that are 27 and under (Judge, Sanchez, Didi, Hicks, Castro, Bird). They combined for a 21.3 WAR this season, and that's with Bird missing almost the entire season and accumulating a -0.4 WAR (he's mashed in the playoffs, though). Their two best SP's according to WAR this season were 23 and 24 respectively (Severino and Montgomery, the latter tied with Tanaka). They have a top 5 farm system that will add even more talent to the roster in the coming seasons, and were able to trade expendable prospects to add big league help for this season and beyond (Gray, Robertson, Frazier).
I mean, it's possible that the Jays could be in a similar spot by 2020 if they get quick development from players like Vlad/Bo/Alford/etc, maybe make some good trades between now and then to add more young players, and draft extremely well, but it's asking a lot. That's why a Donaldson trade makes a lot of sense since it can potentially add 2-3 more pieces to fit that time frame. The Yankees were able to do it, for the most part, without a mass selling spree (except for the last trade deadline when they traded Chapman/Miller/Beltran), so it's doable, but will require a lot of good moves in the same vein as Didi/Hicks/Green/Castro.
Fortunately I realized my aspirations for 2018 was the 2nd WC. Agreed the Twins 85 wins and 2nd WC was a fluke. Regarding the NYY I think the season series was close. That would be a positive.
For me getting from 76 to 87 wins is my goal. 11 more wins. I hope we have better health and that will provide 5-7 more wins.
There was a young dandy named Kipnis
a fine fielder but prone to slipness,
turning a DP in Crocs
to match his red socks,
he fell and injured his hipness
Jonah Keri calls them the Cleveland Lindors. Personally, I'd go with the Cleveland Truffles. Don't trifle with the Truffles, y'all.
Still can't believe that guy won a world series.
I do agree that a Donaldson trade in the off season makes a lot of sense.
If NYY and Boston are already solidly built then they trade away prospects rather than add.
looks like I am spending a lot of time on NYY and Boston. I think that they may be behind Cleveland and Houston by more, than they are ahead of the rest of the AL. Maybe not.
wRC+
Judge (26): 133 ----- Donaldson (32): 142
Sanchez (25): 120 --- Smoak (32): 114
Bird (25): 107 ------ Pearce (35): 112
Gardner (34): 103 --- Morales (35): 108
Hicks (28): 102 ----- Martin (35): 103
Gregorius (28): 98 -- Tulowitzki (33): 101
Castro (28): 97 ----- Travis (27): 101
Headley (34): 97 ---- Pillar (29): 88
Ellsbury (34): 92 --- Carrera (31): 88
Frazier (24): 88 ---- Pompey (25): 88
Torreyes (25): 80 --- Goins (29): 67
Romine (29): 71 ----- Lopez (30): 69
FIP
(they may be projecting some relief innings for some of these SP. and vice versa. not sure exactly.)
Severino (24): 3.60 --- Sanchez (25): 3.16
Tanaka (29): 3.93 ----- Stroman (27): 3.79
Gray (28): 4.12 ------- Happ (35): 4.13
Montgomery (25): 4.51 - Estrada (34): 4.73
Betances (30): 2.69 --- Osuna (23): 3.00
Chapman (30): 2.72 ---- Leone (26): 3.89
Robertson (33): 3.18 -- Loup (30): 3.90
Kahnle (28): 3.40 ----- Barnes (28): 4.13
Green (27): 3.44 ------ Tepera (30): 4.14
Warren (30): 4.12 ----- Biagini (28): 4.32
Shreve (27): 4.30 ----- Dermody (27): 4.71
Hey, Bob Brenly won one and he made Farrell look like John McGraw.
BA after the deadline rated the Yankees 7th and still an elite system. The big difference with the Jays right now in the system is where their top prospects are. Of their top 6 prospects, 5 saw time in AAA last season. Of the Jays' top-6, only 2 saw AA. It is very easy to see Torres, Adams, and Andujar all contributing to the big club next year. The Jays system is still extremely bottom heavy. There's a lot more to like in system than there was a couple of years ago, it's a strong system, but it still will not likely give the Jays much for a couple of years.
Then the projections are awful. At which position other than 3B would you bet on the Jays' player over the Yankees having a better year? Maybe Smoak over Bird? They expect every Yankee hitter to be worse for some reason and in some cases, like Judge and Sanchez, they expect them to be much worse. Another example of how ludicrous they are
"Severino (24): 3.60 --- Sanchez (25): 3.16"
Sanchez has a career XFIP of 3.97 and missed the entire year. Severino has a XFIP this year of 3.04 and has the 4th highest pitching WAR in baseball. Is there anyone in baseball who would take Sanchez over Severino? I think the projections are so off because they are going for regression to the mean but that doesn't factor in the difference between rising players and declining players. Do you expect Morales, Martin, and Tulo all to have better years as they move into their mid-30's? It's possible but very unlikely. Do you expect Judge and Sanchez to be much worse at 25 and 26 years old? Very unlikely. Their numbers were justified by secondary stats. It looks like a conservative model that doesn't account for players breaking out or players severely declining. (Maybe it's because it is factoring more 2016 in but as we go towards 2018, it will factor 2017 in and be more accurate but I don't know)
Also, I think it's about 50/50 Tanaka opts out although if he does, I think he'd most likely just re-sign to a longer deal
as for the yanks, they had surprising performances across the board this year, and the projection systems have no reason to believe that so many of them actually suddenly got much better, as opposed to just overachieving. For example, Judge's .357 is likely not gonna sustain. Especially when the Yanks' "young" players aren't actually that young, and don't even really belong on the "rising" portion of the aging curve.
and even then, young players decline all the time.
as for the jays, yes, tulo improving significantly is a safe bet. And martin isn't actually projected to be any different than he was this year.
It certainly is possible that the key Blue Jay players (Donaldson, Stroman, Sanchez, Travis, Tulo, and Martin) are healthier in 2017 than they were in 2016. It also is possible that the young Yankee stars regress to career norms. In that case, the clubs might be close. But, it's quite a stretch to project both to happen. I somehow doubt that is truly what the projection says, once you have the IP/PA.
Prospects closest to MLB (fv = fangraphs future value prior to the season):
SS Torres (20, 60fv): AAA 96pa, 145wrc+ / AA 139pa, 138wrc+
-----
SS Wade (22): AAA 388pa, 136wrc+
C Jansen (22): AAA 78pa, 172wrc+ / AA 210pa, 121wrc+
3B Andujar (22): AAA 250pa, 139wrc+ / AA 272pa, 126wrc+
CF Alford (22): AAA 13pa, 127wrc+ / AA 289pa, 135wrc+
RH Adams (22): AAA 115.1ip, 4.06xfip / AA 35.0ip, 4.07xfip
LH Borucki (23): AAA 6.0ip, 2.45xfip / AA 46.1ip, 3.25xfip
in general people place far too much faith in young players' performance trajectory, and health (though weirdly not for our own young players).....which is why so many were shocked to see Boston's young players fall off.
and again, most of these Yanks aren't actually young, at least not in terms of aging curves. the likes of gregorius, castro, hicks are all 28 next year - and these projections actually have them all beating their career numbers anyways.
and of course the projections will project the Jays to be healthier next year. no projection would guess them to be hit as hard as they were this year.
Would there be a bidding war for Liriano? I mean he may get $10 mil. I don't think the Jays would pay that. Biagini, prospects and guys like Latos would contend for #6-8.
I guess they change the pictures often.
When Butter applies for the manager job and doesn't get it, can we have him back?
Here's the front office directory. There must be 200 names there, I dunno. Most of the Baseball Media section walked the plank, and I remember them all well from my press box days. All good people, and of course I remember spending much of the 2009 season talking to Mal about Jose Bautista. I kept saying he's a useful guy but what happened to his power? And Mal kept saying, just wait, he's going to start hitting home runs.
I mean, are you seriously arguing that the Jays are about as good as the Yankees? Seriously? It's such a baffling and unjustifiable in every way viewpoint, that it comes across like trolling. If you want to believe the Jays are going to gain 15 wins on the Yankees next year, go for it, but it's not a reasonable belief and it's a belief that nobody outside a few delusional Jays fans will share. The Yankees are much better AND much younger AND have more money to spend. Judge .357 is actually repeatable because he hits the ball harder than anyone in the majors. Highest barrels, highest exit velocity, second hardest hard contact rate. You want to believe that this is all some fluke? That he is going to lose 40 points off of WRC+ next year? Based on what? That you want it to happen? The Yankees had the second best WRC+ of any team from players 27 and under Jays were last. (Actually, they are also 2nd in 25 and under) What you are saying is that it's better to bet on mediocre old players bouncing back to levels of a few years ago then young elite players maintaining production? Better to bet that some washed up 33 YO will be more likely to have better numbers than a 27 year old has legitimately improved? Which Yankee player was much better than their underlying numbers? Anyway, by next year, the projections will all be recalculated I'm sure.
Atkins had said that he had let down Sanchez and Travis and that he was frustrated by inefficiencies in their communications and that they need to do a better job in the information and options they give to players...
I don't know about the front office side, but hopefully they come out with something better than "Let's rise!" next time.
No ring for EE.
i'm not sure why you're struggling to understand this.
Anyways, I am not surprised that the Yankees advanced. I think that they won't make it past the Astros who are exemplars of the '93 Jays method- wear out the opposition with bat after a bat. I have always been partial to the ruthless destruction path to success. We might see a 14-12 game though which will drive "traditionalists" nuts.
The Jays are in the Postseason, probably winning the division. Boston a wildcard while New York is eliminated. That was possible with just a healthy Sanchez. So don’t think this was a bad team in 2017. You couldn’t be more wrong.
My guess is that Gardner gets it on defense and consistency.
Wells was a better hitter but he got brutal defensively.
Here's the front office directory. There must be 200 names there, I dunno. Most of the Baseball Media section walked the plank, and I remember them all well from my press box days. All good people, and of course I remember spending much of the 2009 season talking to Mal about Jose Bautista. I kept saying he's a useful guy but what happened to his power? And Mal kept saying, just wait, he's going to start hitting home runs.
John Lott has a thoughtful article over at the Athletic on the topic. He points out the firings in the media relations department included 3 Canadians, and that Shapiro/Atkins have not hired Canadians for more senior roles.
So a healthy Sanchez would have meant 16-18 more wins? Show me the math.
Well, in the decisive inning last night, four consecutive Cubs reached base on 1) intentional walk 2) strikeout/passed ball 3) catcher's interference 4) hit by pitch. Baseball-reference.com has 2.73 million innings in their database, roughly 70% of major league history. That sequence has never happened before, those four things have never before happened in the same inning, and those four events all occur in just five games.
Yep. They cursed.
Two things. One, intentionally walking Jason Heyward is perhaps openly taunting the baseball gods. Two, those of us still seen to be sporting le tricolore shamelessly enjoy a little schadenfreude. So cursed? Could be. Too bad.
Sanchez was worth 0bWAR this year. The following pitchers have 18+ bWAR in a season: Pud Galvin, Tim Keefe, Old Hoss Radbourn, and Jim Devlin. I'm sure that, if truly healthy, Sanchez could throw 500-600 innings as these warhorses did while maintaining his velocity and avoiding maladies.
Sanchez was a 5 WAR pitcher in 2016 throwing 192 innings (and had never thrown more than 133 innings in a season at any stage in his career before that). If you want to argue that he might be an 8 WAR pitcher if healthy, that's plausible if a significant stretch.
Still.
Starting Rotation or Bullpen?
Young controllable Starter or durable and competent Mid-Rotation type?
Top quality Left-Handed Reliever or dominant Right-Hander?
What they get depends on how much they can spend and/or who they are willing to trade. I think they could use both. But the three words Atkins used, “Wishes, Realistic, Costs”, makes me think that’s not the plan.
What a performance from Verlander.
Smith would have been kept. That adds another .3 WAR.
No idea about the Liriano trade or what else they would have done.
Would they have been close enough to pull the trigger on a 2B trade?
The NYY pen came into the game in the 5th inning. But extra innings did not happen. With the off day today. The Astro pen has had very little work for a long time, due to the quick exit of the Red Sox.
This could be a big problem.
At least I felt pretty good when the Jays had a lead after 7 this year.
The Manager as landlord? I guess that's better than dog owner..
If your rotation has 1 or 2 of this kind of pitcher the team will have a very bad record.
As befitting a team once owned by a beer-monger, you don't buy the mound, you only rent it.
Aside from the history (and even there I don't see the Yankees as a rival like I do Det, KC, or the A's given when my fandom developed) and Aroldis Chapman's loathsome off the field (because on the mound... wow)... there's so much to like about this team. If they pick-up Donaldson, Harper, or Trout (or some combination) in the future they'll be hard to root for but this version of the team is very appealing.
I agree. Dislike for this squad stems from a fundamental opposition to laundry (not that there's anything wrong with that) more than it does to the personalities on the team, which are far, far less objectionable than the standard issue Yankee roster.
It's not the players that I find admirable, it's the benching of veterans.
I like that part a lot.
I'm still upset that the 2015 Jays left Mark Buehrle off their postseason roster.
Bats are being flipped left and right an nobody cares anymore.
I'm not against Price as a super reliever, but not how Gibby used him in a blown open game.
Feels appropriate to see Trump's Yankees eliminated by a team that features key players from Puerto Rico (Correa, Springer)
Springer and Altuve are very likeable characters. Correa much less, but at least there is some talent there. Gurriel is a great hitter. Hopefully the younger brother turns like that. Bergman plays like an automaton, no hesitation, always racing making accurate throws. Verlander is such a big piece for them. Reddick has completely fizzled.
That was a great series. All they had to do was make CC throw strikes and they did.
As a fan, that would hurt.
Also, we might see more curveballs specialists and less crazy contracts on 100mph relievers.
Farrell is fired but Giradi looks good. Using Sale and Severino were decisions that had to be made. No doubt about it. The hole the NYY climbed out of in the WC game may have saved Giradi's job IMO.
If the Jay's had been the 2nd WC and lost the same way as the Twins I expect that a lot would have been written. Just getting in was an achievement by Molitor.
Regarding the Jays losing that game, if it had happened, the strong possibility was OF defense. If Bautista is the weakest defensive OF, you still have to play him because of his recent playoff heroics. No choice. If he makes a costly error ....
I am not trolling and nobody has accused me of that. But we have some time to kill before Tue when it will be "Play Ball". Anyone feel like chatting?
Isn't that just spit? Spit is allowed right?
I still wonder why all the opposing coaches let Kimbrel pitch with that hat that has that huge greasy stain on the bill. Can't you ask for him to switch to a clean cap?
We could probably use a fresh thread for the World Series.
I see Houston as the favorite because the Dodgers are missing a key player.
Verlander's performance could be key. Also they don't lose too much without the DH.
Sounds like Seager will play for L.A., although he might get DH time at Minute Maid. Should be a fun series, here's hoping it goes 7!
A Yasiel Puig bat-flip
A dominant start by Kershaw
Springer taking a home run (perhaps on the Puig bat-flip?)
A Verlander complete game (yeah, I know he did it vs. the Yankees, I'm greedy)
Justin Turner attempting a triple in extra innings
Someone - anyone - bunting for a hit against the shift
A Game 7