Melky gets the day off to rest his legs, Bonifacio gets his first start since the all-star break. Dan Straily for the A's on Jewish heritage night.
Melky gets the day off to rest his legs, Bonifacio gets his first start since the all-star break. Dan Straily for the A's on Jewish heritage night.
I didn't know A.A.'s job was contingent on which Jake Peavy played for.
1) If Peavy goes to any Team outside the A.L. East, I'm disappointed but basically "who cares".
2) When Peavy comes to the A.L. East to a Team not named Toronto, I'm pissed because it just another difficulty Toronto must face, one that could have been avoided.
3) Anyone not worried is not that much of a Fan.
Now, if the Jays could trade/extend someone like Tim Lincecum that could be interesting as his HR/9 rate jumped but just to 1.1 per 9, while his K/9 has stayed over 9 in every single season he has played. His walks scare me, but he is an easy one to see being an ace still. Would I just straight trade for him? No, not without an extension for at least one more season unless you were just giving up salary (ie: Johnson who I cannot see the Jays making a qualifying offer to at the moment).
Basically, who cares?
Now, perhaps you might suggest a worthwhile acquisition A.A. might make.
Toronto's main opponents in the East are currently running circles around the Jays.
I would love to see Melky traded, mainly to make way for Kevin Pillar. In a down year for prospects, I can't believe he's not getting more buzz. He's not only advancing rapidly through each level of the minors, but also getting better at each successive stop.
Looking at the stats our Blue Jays are 7th in runs scored which is pretty good. If only the starting pitching...
Peavy is transitioning into a #3\4 starter. As a 32 year old, his stats are sliding to .."meh". I would rather see what the prospects would have to offer.
Rogers hopefully sees this and is willing to let AA go to $150 this winter, but if you can clear out another $10-20 mil of salary it would be a lot easier to go get a big gun this winter. Be it Lincecum, Cano (oh would that be sweet, but super unlikely) or someone else via trade. Buehrle right now might be trade-able ala Wells after he had a good year despite the dollars remaining. AA should strike while the iron's hot and (hopefully) use the money wisely to set up this team for 2014/2015 before the Yankees can recover.
According to Jason Stark the only player the Jays are looking to move is Bonifacio. I find that strange. There is a log jam in the bullpen. You have impending free agents like Davis and DeRosa. Plus there could be other deals.
This suggests that AA is still all in on this team being good enough to win next season.
I like this idea
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/07/blue-jays-interested-in-howie-kendrick.html
Kendrick would be a nice solid 2bagger. Then, this off season, the Jays need to just rethink what they want to do about starting ptiching. I think the offense would be good enough.
I kind of would like to see the Jays put some of the guys in the minors up to see what they can do. (like Nolin).
I find it funny that in one thread we are pissed that we didn't get Peavy and in another thread we should trade Beurhle. Statistically speaking, aren't they very similar the last three years? I think we would have to give up more to get Peavy then we would get back for Beurhle. I also think that Beurhle's pitching style is more likely to continue success, I think Peavy is trending in the wrong direction.
I would like to see a trade for Kendrick.
I am not excited about a trade for Kendrick. He would be an upgrade at 2B (although not as much as you would think) but would no doubt cost some top prospects and /or some starting pitching. The Jays don't have either to give up.
Sell.
You can always upgrade in the offseason.
He doesn't have to be great, only reasonably durable / crafty / effective. You can never have enough starting pitching, as teams like Toronto, LA (both teams), Texas and other clubs have discovered. I don't see how fans of a team that has started the likes of Laffey, Ortiz, Wang, Romero and Germano this year, and whose best starter has been the veteran Buehrle, can get on the Red Sox (14 games ahead of the Jays, and farm system virtually undepleted) for this one.
Reyes-SS Izturis-2B Bautista-RF Encarnacion-DH Lind-1B Rasmus-CF Davis-LF Thole-C Lawrie-3B
We'll see if anyone gets pulled out of the game after the first inning, but most likely it means that Bonifacio/Cabrera/Arencibia or a pitcher would be the possible players going the other way in any trade.
Kennedy would probably post an ERA between 4.5 and 5 in the AL East, taking into account his performance over the last 2 years. That has some value, but not a huge amount.
Actually this reeks of AA's failure to pull the trigger on a Mat Latos deal. Thank God we didn't add 350 innings, 320 Ks, and a 118 ERA+ at 5.25 Million these past 2 years. It was really worth hanging on to Snider, Gose, Jiminez and Hutchinson.
The Jays are probably hoping to deepen the lineup with an upgrade or two and that the rotation rebounds next year (bolstered by somewhat better organizational pitching depth). If the team really wants to go all in, it could move some of it's better prospects. It's not the most inspiring strategy, but the team would seem to be somewhat hemmed in by its contractual obligations and depleted farm system. There is reason to believe the team will be better next year, but will it be good enough to beat the elite teams in its division?
I was trying to think back to what the equivalent would have been then (vs now) but if you prefer then D'Arnaud, Gose/Marisnick and Alvarez/Drabek should have got it done. Either way it was clear we had the pieces to make a bit and it was a mistake not to go all in.
And that's not even getting into Darvish/Chapman.
Basically, those 3 didn't show as many warning signs as Peavy does. Peavy in 2 of the 3 years before this one was below 95 for ERA+, jumped to 128 last year and dropped to 100 this. His HR/9 rate has jumped lately too, from 0.8 in 2011, to 1.1 last year to 1.6 this year - a rate that is much, much too high. Now, his K/9 and BB/9 figures are nice at 8.6 and 1.9, no question those are very good signs for him. But that HR rate... put that in Fenway and fears climb, in SkyDome they might be even higher.
I'm not saying the Miami and Mets trades were a bad idea. I was in favour of the Miami trade and (more cautiously) the Mets trade. And I still like Buerhle and Dickey (although Dickey and the RC now seem to be a poor match - he might be better off on a different team). I'm saying that in all the circumstances (talent relinquished, remaining contractual obligation, present and recent performance, risk/reward), Peavy looks like a good move.
I'm not suggesting panic moves, but there are so many things wrong with this team and no one seems to be doing much about it.
When you put it like that, it's surprising other teams weren't beating down the doors trying to collect these assets :)
- Maybe JPA doesn't need to be the everyday catcher for the rest of the season. Is Thole good enough to be a backup? is he good enough to be a starter?
- If Melky is still too gimpy to play the field, put him on the DL and see what Pillar can do for a couple months.
- Ditto for Adam Lind's back: if the Jays can't find a way to keep him healthy & effective, he has no place on the 2014 team.
- Is there any point at all to Emilio Bonifacio? I really don't know.
- How much blame for this disastrous season falls to the coaching staff?
1) Toronto has $112-ish MM in guaranteed signed contracts in 2014. In addition, Rasmus and Bonifacio are Arb-3 ($10 MM - $12 MM), Arencibia, Cecil, Rogers and Lincoln are Arb -1 ($10 MM - $15 MM) and anywhere from 6-10 Pre-Arbs ($2.75 MM - $5.5 MM).
2) Still needed are:
a) Top Quality Starting Pitching,
b) Very good Defensive 2B,
c) Quality D.H. able to play a position in the field,
d) 4th Outfielder, able to play CF as well.
3) Josh Johnson needs to pitch differently than he is. If he's kept, he needs the "Weighted Ball" Program. As should all Starters/Relievers.
Meanwhile Izturis continues to baffle. 2 errors but 2 hits also. What do you do with him? Ideally the Jays find someone to play 2B next year and let Izturis be what he should be, namely a backup for 2B/3B. Still dream of the Jays going big with Cano.
Others to watch would be Thole - howsabout playing him 2 or 3 games in a row just to see if his timing comes back? Lawrie - a hit and a walk is always nice. Those three (Izturis, Thole, Lawrie) are key to figure out for 2014 - can you count on any of them and if so in what role. We know Bautista, Encarnacion, Rasmus, and Reyes and what they can/should do. It is the rest who matter now.
So questions for 2013 to answer...
- Lind - do you use his option for 2014 or cut him loose?
- Davis - do you resign him? For how much?
- Izturis - is he just a backup? How much should you count on him? I like him as a backup for Lawrie's injuries but not everyday
- Lawrie - will he become a star, or a serviceable player at least? At 2B or 3B?
- Rasmus - do you sign him long term? For how much in years/dollars?
- LF - who plays it in 2014? Cabrera is a flop, Gose has done poor in AAA as has Sierra. Pillar looks good but is he the real deal? Do you sign another free agent/do a trade/play Davis instead?
- CA - Thole & JPA, how to job share or do you get another guy to catch?
- Rotation - ugh. Disaster this year but a cast of thousands of #4/5 guys for 2014, are any #1's? Do you find another one somehow? Who and how? Need to get ML innings for some of the kids if possible.
- Pen - who to keep, who to trade, etc. Oliver is gone for sure but that still leaves a lot of guys to work though.
My gut? Lind will be kept but should be cut, Davis should/will be resigned, Izturis will be at 2B everyday, Lawrie at 3B, Rasmus...not sure, LF will be Cabrera again (sigh), CA JPA with Thole a rarely used backup or another backup brought in. Rotation will be pieced together from what is there now as will the pen. Some guys lost due to the numbers game. Hopefully I'm wrong.
So, if I understand your analytical method correctly: you see a player traded to another team, and then -- with the benefit of hindsight -- you criticize the Jays for failing to obtained that same player because "we had the pieces." I find this a dubious method. First, you're cherry-picking those pieces selectively, by including players like Snider, Gose and Drabek who obviously look worse in hindsight. What if the Reds had insisted on Sanchez and others? Second, you're assuming that the only factor in a trade is "the pieces." There are many other factors in a trade negotiation, not just the existence of pieces. Thirdly, you're choosing a player (Latos) who looks very good in hindsight and you're assuming that it was completely obvious that he would continue to pitch at the same high level for the two years after the trade. Again, this is cherry-picking. There are many pitchers who decline drastically after playing very well for a couple of years -- some of them are on the Jays payroll today and nobody assumed in 2011 that they would decline so drastically. These things are not as easily predictable as you're implying.
I can't imagine why - he was 6-5, 4.65 at Toronto's Dome. That's a little worse than his career average. He probably liked pitching in Tampa's Dome (10-5, 3.29), but that may have had more to do with the quality of hitters than anything else.
I specifically chose the players I did because at the time I believe they were more highly valued than the ones you would have me choose (i.e. Gose vs. Marisnick). The validity of that argument is a matter of subjectivity. I wasn't cherry picking the players, nor was I cherry picking Latos (Gio Gonzalez would have been an obvious alternative). Look through my post history and you will see me pushing for Latos (and Gio Gonzalez ) at the time and a disappointment when we didn't pony up. I still believe at those were relatively weak packages to acquire young, controllable, #1b/2 starters. I still believe, as I did then, that it was a failure to be pro-active at a time when it was necessitated.
Due to memory loss, I have a short list.
David Cone. Yes he was good.
Jack Morris. We did not trade for him so he does not count, but we won 2 WS so I mention him. We paid for 3 years and got 1 good year IMO.
Juan Guzman. Yes he was good. But M Sharperson was given up. So it was a minor deal that turned out great.
David Wells in the Roger Clemens deal.
Memory is coming back. Mike Flannagan. IMO he was good before and after the trade.
Duane Ward. Yes he was good. Doyle Alexander was good/reliable. Tom Glavine turned out better but I always favor the hard thrower. So I am not allowed to complain.
So assuming that it is not easy to get good pitchers in a trade then RA Dickey, J Johnson and Mark Buehrle are 3 good pitchers that we got in 1 off season. It would seem that is great but the results did not show up.