According to numerous St. Louis-based media outlets, Cardinals manager Tony LaRussa is retiring.
This is what's known as "going out on top," I guess!
According to numerous St. Louis-based media outlets, Cardinals manager Tony LaRussa is retiring.
This is what's known as "going out on top," I guess!
The only item I didn't like about that radio station's news item (linked to) -- and it's in viritually every item I saw out of the Arch city media -- is the reference to LaRussa as the Cardinals' "head coach." Ugh.
I'd lay this on St. Louis being a football town but with no major Division I football schools in the area an no actual NFL team (wait, what?) that seems unlikely ...
LaRussa had a perfect situation in St. Louis, and also made the best of it. Every manager would love to be in a place where it was absolutely clear that given a dispute between manger and player, the manager will win. While this often looks odd from a talent use point of view, that invisible part of managing, the people managing, making your players happy, keeping the clubhouse in order, etc. LaRussa seemed to especially excel at that, with the upper managemnet having his back. Knowing the guy writing the lineup card wants you there, because if he didn't, you'd be gone, is probably a large positive that isn't going to be quantifiable. It's worth getting rid of the occasional talent if you can get the best out of everyone else, and LaRussa seemed to manage that remarkably well, from the fringe starters to the star players.
Aside from the bullpen management that he helped popularize and others imitated, LaRussa also gets a bit of credit for the steroid era - his A's teams were patient zero, and his justifiable silence on the issue, and subsequent hiring of McGwire all those years later, show that he above all else has the players back. I'm quite seriously calling this a plus for him as a manager, even if I also wish it hadn't happened.