This question treats LF, CF and RF as distinct positions, although one of these may or may not be the position in question. As always, no looking up the answer if you want to guess.
This question treats LF, CF and RF as distinct positions, although one of these may or may not be the position in question. As always, no looking up the answer if you want to guess.
1B 1984? Al Oliver, Cliff Johnson, Willie Upshaw
That can't be right but gotta start somewhere.
Shall I let people know if the position is correct, even if none of the players are the same?
1997 LF with Stewart, Brumfield and Cruz Jr.
(just checked, close-ish but no cigar)
So if we take it as that then the time period has to be between now and 94 and before 84 or so. I have no idea about the 84 and before, but I do have some thoughts on the last 15 years. Pretty sure it was not 1B, since Delgado and Overbay dominated the position. I don't recall us going with a trio of catchers, so scratch that. I think CF has been pretty stable as well. If I'd have to narrow it down more, I would think either LF, 3B or SS. (possibly 2B too) Those 3 positions are really ones we've seen a ton of turnover and no real big starter for a while. 3B did have some stability with Glaus and Rolen and Hinske, so maybe not that. So I'd think LF or SS. Perhaps LF in one of the years Reed Johnson was here or SS when Eckstein along with Scutaro and Mac were on the team?
Left field '93 was interesting, particularly given that it was a Championship team.
|
G | GS | Inn |
Joe Carter | 55 | 55 | 466 |
Rickey Henderson | 44 | 44 | 377 |
Turner Ward | 33 | 22 | 221 |
Darnell Coles | 31 | 26 | 207 |
Rob Butler | 15 | 11 | 105 |
Willie Canate | 17 | 4 | 65 |
I have to think that the two ripest areas where this would have happened would be the 2Bmen in the late 90s, what with injuries to Bush and his series of replacements or with the DHs in the 80s, where we saw quick rotations of saavy veterans (read: old or generally washed up) in and out of the job.
I recall 1993 shortstop being a mess until Tony came back, but I'm certain less than 100 games passed before he returned and I cannot imagine Griffin got 50 starts that year anyways as the 3rd SS.
Outfield seems likely with someone moving around a lot. Such as '92 with Winfield/Carter sharing RF and Carter/whoever in LF (iirc).
Odds are a rookie came up and took over late, with a vet or failed kid starting the season with the other doing mid-season.
Oh, there is an idea...
1987 second base: Iorg, Liriano, Lee all had significant time iirc.
Nah. Burroughs yes. Oliver started 48. Johnson wasn't there as long as I thought. Len Matuszek actually started 39.
Kasi wins. In 2008, the Jays had three players start at least 50 games at SS: Eckstein (56), Scutaro (53) and McDonald (52). Congrats. You will receive a no-prize in the mail shortly.
This was the instance no one had come close on and I would certainly have never guessed. In 1995, there was a split at catcher with: Sandy Martinez (54), Mystery Catcher (49) and Randy Knorr (41). These were the only three players to get playing time for the Jays at catcher that year. Who was the third catcher?
Indeed. And it was. There is one time-sharing arrangement of 3x40+ games started that hasn't been guessed, if anyone is up for further trivia.
Of note: 1 times Stieb threw 11 innings, 17 times 9 or more, just 8 times (out of 38) did he not get 6 innings in. 5 game scores over 80, with one over 90. Yet somehow he came in 4th in Cy Young voting to Pete Vuckovich who's only advantage was 1 more win and 8 fewer losses thanks to a much better offense and bullpen (V had 8 fewer starts, 65 fewer innings, more walks and fewer K's than Stieb). Geez were the voters idiots back then (other than the 5 who voted for Stieb in 1st place).
Since the guesses have died down, I'll let you know that the other 3x40 was 2B in 2002.
The glory days of Freed Johntalanotto, with a guest appearance by Bobby Kielty.
I'm quite curious how often the 3x50 games started mark occurs, as I can't imagine it occurs frequently, but checking that throughout major league history seems quite time consuming.