Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
I'll be massive conquistador.


Blue Jays 7, White Sox 3. Wins 7, Losses 3.

I'm still giddy. I missed Wednesday's game. I don't know what it's like to watch the 2010 Blue Jays get pounded. Without such knowledge, I have no choice but to remain excited about how the team's played so far. The reality that wins and losses probably don't matter hasn't set in yet. As far as I'm concerned, that's not reality.

Hands up, everybody who had Dana Eveland sitting on a 1.35 ERA after 13.1 innings, with a 56.4% groundball rate. He's dealing. The Sox lean right - for a lefty, six strong innings against Chicago are no small feat. The only offense Chicago managed against Eveland was an insignificant solo homer by backup catcher Donny Lucy, after the Jays were up 7-0 and Eveland was pitching to the score, like a real Hall of Famer.

I didn't pay much attention to how Eveland attacked hitters. I think this start was more representative of the real Dana Eveland than the last one was. Eveland bulldozed 28 Orioles on 92 pitches; he threw 23 White Sox 90 pitches. The groundballs could be here to stay, and the tolerable K/BB ratio for a lefty may stick around too. But I suspect Eveland will start pitching away from contact more as the season wears on, resulting in fewer innings per start. 

It was wonderful to have the roof open for two or three innings. I've never been so cold inside the Dome, but 10-degree weather beats the hell out of indoor baseball. The Dome just feels less barren and mausoleum-like when the roof is open. I don't notice the empty seats as much. I also figure that the cold weather turns the Dome into a nasty pitchers' park. If true, that has to hurt this year's Jays, with their legion of all-or-nothing hitters and their questionable outfield defense. (It did knock a couple of balls into the outer reaches of Jeremy Reed's range in right field, though, and Reed capitalized both times with difficult running catches. His routes looked perfect from the upper deck.)

It's not impossible to hit one out with the roof open, of course. In the second, Snider opened the scoring with a no-doubter into the second deck off Freddy Garcia. The solo homer nearly doubled his slugging percentage. He was due.

Here's an angle I haven't seen much of about the interminable Snider/lineup discussion. Snider, as the 8 hitter, bats right before McWhoever. This results in Snider getting less than nothing to hit. 17 of his 38 plate appearances have ended in a strikeout or a walk. Ordinarily, I wouldn't care, but it looks to me like Snider has been pressing, and you can't make a big impression by drawing walks. If I'm right, you'd think it might make more sense to put him in the Maximum Protection slot in the lineup. That's the one right before Adam Lind, where the current occupant is tattooing everything thrown his way. Gonzalez should stay right where he is, obviously. But if he gets an off day sometime this weekend, I nominate Snider to fill the 2-hole in his absence.

Here's one stab at the eventual lineup: Lewis/Bautista, Gonzalez, Lind, Wells, Snider, Hill, Overbay, Buck, Encarnacion? Maybe swap Overbay into the 1-hole? Or Hill and Gonzalez? It's going to be a puzzler.

Gonzalez has been impressive. He's getting on top of a lot of baseballs. The small 2010 sample reflects it: Gonzo's popup rate (IFFB%, infield flies as a percentage of flyballs) sits at 5.9%, well below his extremely high career mark of 17.2%. The Jays are still easily filling their popup quota, though. For that, they can thank their human fungo bat: Wells' rate sits at a lofty 31.3%. He has literally hit as many homers as popups, though, and his walk rate is through the roof.

Jose Bautista's ability to draw walks while doing absolutely nothing else is remarkable. He is walking 24.5% of the time. Certainly, he has an excellent batting eye. But that walk rate raises a serious question: What the hell are all these pitchers afraid of? Bautista's career isolated power is .161, which is certainly higher than I would have guessed. But he's a career .237 hitter. Still, Freddy Garcia went 3-2 on Bautista to open the first. Splitter, ball four. Why? Then he went 3-2 again with a base open in the fourth. Slider, ball four. Then Randy Williams, who at least has the excuse of being lefthanded, went 3-2 on Bautista in the fifth. Slider, ball four. Don't these people have advance scouts? Garcia and Williams were throwing to Lucy, who's a rookie and might not know about Bautista's hitting style. But pitchers are allowed to shake catchers off. Bautista now has a wicked-awesome .194/.388/.333 line. He has 12 walks, 8 strikeouts and 7 hits. Until the book gets out, I'm perfectly happy with him batting leadoff in front of murderer's row.

Congratulations are in order for Natinals closer Matt Capps, who recorded his 71st career save against the dreaded Phillies. This was a very special occasion for Capps. For the first time in his career, he went more than one inning to record a save. 

The first-place Jays are home this weekend for a three-game set contra los Angeles de Los Angeles. The Angels are 3-7, dead last in the West, 3.5 behind Oakland, 2.5 behind Texas, and 1 behind Seattle. They've dropped series to the Twins, A's and Yankees, and been outscored by 24 runs. As always, they are outperforming their Pythagorean. But Mike Scioscia does not think they are playing particularly well.

Tonight, Anaheim ace Jered Weaver does battle with Shaun Marcum. Weaver is an enormous flyball pitcher (career 32.4% GB) who hides the ball well and throws nasty breaking balls. He has slightly larger than normal splits. Fred Lewis should play tonight. Weaver has thrown 6 innings in each of his two starts, both Anaheim wins: a solid win over the Twins and a dominant no-decision against the A's. The Angels are 1-7 whenever anyone else takes the mound. It is time to crush their spirit.

It's a pick'em at 7:05 tonight.
16 April 2010: Dead Bull With a Life From the Low | 27 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Gerry - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 10:43 AM EDT (#213745) #

Bob Elliott has a detailed day by day account of the signing of Hechavarria.

Antopoulos’ first impression seeing the 5-foot-11 178-pounder?

“His body, he’s wiry, strong, not an ounce of body fat,” Anthopoulos said. “Watching him walk was impressive. When you look at young shortstops you wonder if they are going to get thicker in the lower half which might cause them to lose a step defensively”

Anthopoulos said the prospect was not as thick as Alfonso Soriano, but had a similar build to Julio Lugo, Edgar Rentaria and B.J. Upton, who is taller.

What the Jays entourage saw was an athletic fielder with quick twitch muscles.

 

April 10, Dunedin.

Hechavarria undergoes an eye examination. The Jays doctor says he has 20-8 vision, the best eyesight the doctor has ever seen.

 

Mike Green - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 11:08 AM EDT (#213747) #
Fangraphs has their "3 stars of the game" on their website.  Sure, it aint "la premiere etoile...Yvan Cournoyer", but you've gotta start somewhere.  I wonder what ballplayers would do when coming out of the dugout after an announcement like that; a tip of the cap would seem a little restrained.

What's up with the Angels?  So far, it looks like they are really feeling the losses of Figgins and Lackey (doesn't that sound like a cheap political consultancy firm?).

AWeb - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 12:42 PM EDT (#213753) #
What the hell are all these pitchers afraid of?

They don't have to be afraid of anything...Scutaro lead the team in walks last year (at an unprecendented level for him), Figgins lead the league. Fukudome takes a lot of walks without much power, as does Span...there's always a few guys around. Walking is as much on the hitter as the pitcher. Bautista isn't seeing a ton of pitches right now (less than 4/AB) for a guy leading the league in walks; Bautista may have found the magical "taking a walk" groove, and doesn't look like a slap hitting on base machine, but hey, whatever works. It's not likely to last of course.

So the Jays are 1-2 in one-run games, and 0-1 in extra innings, but are still 7-3? Strange lineups aside - yay! Also, on pace for 113 wins on the year, when do you start setting up the playoff rotation?  More realistically, the Jays have a 6 game lead on Baltimore already, who don't usually divebomb until the end of the year.
martinthegreat - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 12:54 PM EDT (#213755) #
Agreed... the wins and losses are likely to not matter in the long-run. But I figure as an organization one has to try to keep the best possible team on the field and keep winning as long as the team is actually winning. Sure, at some point we'll probably drop to .500, but until we do we have to operate hoping that we won't.

As for Snider, I don't think we should encourage him to become a hitter that needs protection to produce.

I like Bautista... his walk rate will likely decline but his average will certainly go up. If he can even it out to a .380 OBP all year that would be fantastic.

Jevant - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 12:57 PM EDT (#213756) #
Considering his OBP is currently .388, and his career is .331, I think .380 might be toward the high end of projections.  If he OBP's .350 I will be very, very, very happy.
Alex Obal - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 03:47 PM EDT (#213766) #
I just don't get why you would throw Bautista anything other than a fastball in a three-ball count, particularly if you are righthanded. It's harder to throw offspeed pitches for strikes, and Bautista is now the AL walk leader. The Sox did that three times last night, with predictable results. When you're unoverpowering, like Freddy Garcia is, Bautista is going to recognize anything offspeed and spit on it.
Forkball - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 04:00 PM EDT (#213767) #
Bob Elliott has a detailed day by day account of the signing of Hechavarria.

Good stuff, especially if you can get past the grade school writing mistakes.
Chuck - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 04:32 PM EDT (#213769) #

I just don't get why you would throw Bautista anything other than a fastball in a three-ball count, particularly if you are righthanded.

This business of getting more walks than hits is rare (rarer even than I thought before I did some checking), but not unprecedented. You'd expect it from power hitters once in a while, where the walks are a result of careful pitching. Bonds turned the trick his last 6 seasons. McGwire did it twice. Ted Williams did it once. Babe Ruth did it just once, at age 40. I'm sure there were others.

Bautista obviously does not fall into this category of scary bat wielders. When I see what he is doing this year, I think back to Lance Blankenship, who had even less of a reason to be pitched to carefully. I recall Toby Harrah, close to retirement and with the tank nearly empty, willing himself to be not merely a good on on-base machine, but to be an on-base beast. And I think of Nick Johnson, who would appear to still have some hitting chops, but who it seems is now going to the plate looking to walk first, and hit second. His walks exceeded his hits in Florida and so far that pattern is holding in New York.

What about Rickey Henderson? From age 37 to age 44, he had one good season where he hit. The rest of the time, any value he had was directly related to his ability to walk. Why was he walking? Why were pitchers not just throwing him strikes?

And the same for Bautista. The scouting report can't be hard to suss out. He has 12 BB and 7 H. He is going to the plate looking to walk. Why are pitchers obliging him? He's not exactly Eddie Gaedel.

scottt - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 06:35 PM EDT (#213773) #
Considering his OBP is currently .388, and his career is .331, I think .380 might be toward the high end of projections.  If he OBP's .350 I will be very, very, very happy.

Yeah, but he was mostly playing in the bottom of the lineup where there was no point for him to get on base and get stranded.

I remember a Pirates fan commenting  out that Pittsburgh had no clue how to make use of his  ability to get on base back when Toronto acquired him.

We'll see.

scottt - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 09:46 PM EDT (#213775) #
I could make an argument for the pitcher hitting and Ruiz DHing for Overbay.


Wildrose - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 10:01 PM EDT (#213776) #
I thought the story by Elliott was outstanding. The guy sure loves stories about scouting and Canadian baseball.
Chuck - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 10:27 PM EDT (#213777) #
Halladay was roughed up tonight, giving up 2 runs in 8 innings. Offensively, he is now tied with Overbay for hits.
ComebyDeanChance - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 10:57 PM EDT (#213779) #
Halladay was roughed up tonight, giving up 2 runs in 8 innings. Offensively, he is now tied with Overbay for hits.

Roy's gotta way to go to catch Overbay's -20 OPS+ heading into tonight's game. Actually, Overbay is charting new territory, and we might have to develop an OPS- stat for him.
electric carrot - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 11:04 PM EDT (#213780) #
What is up with Overbay?  I mean seriously.  Does anyone have a guess?  What's the argument against sending him down to triple to work on his swing?  Whose going to claim him at this point?
Mike Green - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 11:15 PM EDT (#213781) #
The view from 217 tonight...Overbay's timing is way, way off, and as a result his swing is wooden.  Lind and Snider still have a lot of work to do in the field, but you knew that already.  And the feel of the crowd was a lot like Exhibition Stadium in the early 80s- there were quite a few who left when the Angels took the 7-1 lead in the top of the eighth but those who remained (none left in my section) were diehard fans, and the crowd had some energy even before Ruiz hit his homer. 

And finally, Cito, please, if you're down by 2 in the top of the ninth and the opposition sends out a RH pitcher to face John Buck, may I humbly suggest that a LH pinch-hitter is in order. Fred Lewis would do. 



Alex Obal - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 11:28 PM EDT (#213782) #
First and second with two out down 2, Buck can bat for himself. But letting him lead off down 2?? That's two question marks crazy. Even McCoy would be a better choice. Lewis probably wasn't available - McDonald was in the on-deck circle to bat for himself in the 9th. The bench looked resigned at that point.

I think Overbay got spooked by Jepsen's fastball. He's the hardest thrower the Jays have seen since Feliz. That doesn't help you when you're already facing timing issues.
92-93 - Friday, April 16 2010 @ 11:52 PM EDT (#213783) #

The worst part about tonight was Snider misreading that liner to RF. With the new acquisition of Lewis I was hoping Cito might start him vs. RHP and try Snider in RF, but tonight probably reaffirmed to Cito what he believes.

I doubt there's much rope left for Accardo while Carlson and Roenicke are banging on the door.

John McDonald appears to have lost a step defensively, and if that's true, that could be very bad news. Hit a nice line drive off Weaver though to keep the fans happy.

stevieboy22 - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 12:14 AM EDT (#213784) #
Wouldn't it be in the Jays best interest to give a Lind/Wells/Snider outfield an honest shot?

With Dopirak, Wallace and Cooper it would be really nice if they had the DH spot open....

TamRa - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 02:44 AM EDT (#213787) #
Wouldn't it be in the Jays best interest to give a Lind/Wells/Snider outfield an honest shot?

I said that all winter but i don't see any evidence of it. Of course the problem with that is such a lineup has no one REMOTELY suited to lead off.

With Lewis here we have such a player but i still think there's a lot to be said for putting Snider in right every night and seeing how he plays there once and for all.


scottt - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 08:06 AM EDT (#213791) #
So far, the offense is better than expected.Hill will come back soon and I hope they at least platoon Overbay, he's got zero trade value right now, anyway. If Bautista stops walking, you can give Lewis a shot against RHP.

It sucks that Marcum has an 0-1 line at that point. He's been better than that.

 Frasor, Accardo and Morrow have struggled. Gregg is now closing. Morrow needs more time. If Accardo doesn't improve, they'll send him to AAA to work on his stuff. It could be a lot worse, Janssen, Gregg, Camp and Downs have been very good. I still don't know what to think of Valdez.



Elsewhere, Boston and Tampa had a quite a duel out there that went nowhere.





Thomas - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 11:36 AM EDT (#213799) #
And finally, Cito, please, if you're down by 2 in the top of the ninth and the opposition sends out a RH pitcher to face John Buck, may I humbly suggest that a LH pinch-hitter is in order. Fred Lewis would do.

I disagree with both you and Alex in that I would have saved Lewis to bat for McDonald (which it didn't appear Cito was going to do with McDonald in the on-deck circle, but that's another issue). I understand the argument that you want your best chance of someone getting on in front of Ruiz or Snider with their home-run power, but I'd still argue the best chance for a victory lay in gaining the biggest advantage in the team's first four hitters as possible, which is substituting Lewis for McDonald. It'd be nice to have someone to hit for Buck, but with a 4-man bench where two of the options are an injured Encarnacion and Molina, the team's hands are tied.

Thomas - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 11:44 AM EDT (#213801) #
Actually, thinking about it, I'm beginning to see things your way. You put Lewis in to hit for Buck to gain an OBP advantage and to increase the possibility of getting someone on base for Ruiz or Snider. Then, you hit McCoy for McDonald if it gets that far.

There's an argument that Buck to McCoy (in effect, the extra sustitution) isn't much of an upgrade, if at all. However, by replacing Buck with Lewis you gain an advantage in front of Ruiz and Snider. I don't think this is one of Cito's howlers (assuming he had Lewis - who was in the dugout - ready for McDonald), but I've persuaded myself that your call was the right one.

Thomas - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 11:50 AM EDT (#213804) #
Also, I predict we will have our first Randy Ruiz at first base sighting today. Overbay hit one ball hard yesterday, but he looked out of sorts on Weaver's breaking pitches and I suspect could use the day off with a left-hander pitching. If not today, I'm not sure when he'll make it out onto the field.
Chuck - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 12:26 PM EDT (#213807) #

I predict we will have our first Randy Ruiz at first base sighting today.

Nope. According to Fox, Overbay plays 1B and bats 5th (against the southpaw). Ruiz will be DHing, batting 7th. Is there an unofficial Snider/Ruiz platoon now in effect?

chris_jays - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 12:32 PM EDT (#213808) #
Only while E5 is hurt I would assume.
scottt - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 02:24 PM EDT (#213812) #
"We need Lyle to get going," Gaston said. "I don't think sitting him is going to help him at all. He needs to get out there and just keep battling and hope something turns around."

I think platooning would help, considering he hasn't hit lefties that well since 2007. It's not likely to change this year.
Alex Obal - Saturday, April 17 2010 @ 05:06 PM EDT (#213813) #
Overbay looks close to getting it.

I love all the talk about heart and hustle, but the Jays are giving away a bunch of outs on the basepaths.
16 April 2010: Dead Bull With a Life From the Low | 27 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.