Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
You don't feel taken and you don't feel abused.

Oh, who the hell am I kidding? PLAYOFFS!


Blue Jays 3, Rangers 1.

C.J. Wilson outduels Ricky Romero for seven innings, exiting with a 1-0 lead, and Neftali Feliz adds another zero in the eighth. But you can't keep Vernon Wells down forever. Wells breaks the Jays' goose egg in the ninth with a bomb off Frank Francisco. Then the floodgates open. Lyle Overbay, built for speed, triples. Edwin Encarnacion cashes him with a sac fly. Alex Gonzalez and Mike McCoy add hits to make it 3-1. Jason Frasor picks up the save.

Question: How many homers does Wells need to hit to make sure he doesn't get booed at the home opener?

Romero threw seven efficient and effective innings at the Rangers. He gave up one 'earned' run on a dubious wild pitch, K'd 4, walked 2, and surrendered five hits. By my unofficial count, Romero induced groundballs on 12 of 21 balls in play, an excellent 57.1% rate. (League average - I know I say this all the time, but I don't think it's common knowledge yet - is around 44%. Roy Halladay, career, is at 56.2%. Ted Lilly is 34.5%.) Romero threw 3.77 pitches per batter, which is just about average. Even if you want to apply a getaway day discount, those numbers, against a strong offense in a hitters' ballpark, are impressive to me.

Janssen pitched a scoreless inning. He had three strikeouts, a walk and a wild pitch. If only he could harness his remarkable stuff, and maybe pitch to contact a bit more...

On an unrelated note, three games into the season is as good a time as any for a check of the Blue Jays WPA Leaderboard! (Unofficial, because Fangraphs hasn't updated yet as of this writing. These numbers should be accurate to within 0.01 WPA.)

Position players:
WELLS 0.82
Lind 0.08
Overbay 0.07
Encarnacion 0.02
Hill 0.01
Gonzalez 0.01
McCoy 0.00
Bautista -0.01
Snider -0.09
Molina -0.12
Buck -0.16

Pitchers:
Romero 0.23
Gregg 0.16
Downs 0.15
Janssen 0.03
Marcum -0.03
Tallet -0.04
Frasor -0.63

I mean, was Marcum terrible on Monday, or what?

Anyway, Wells is mashing and the pitchers have delivered three quality starts in a hostile environment. So far, so good. This is as good a time as ever to ponder Kevin Gregg's role and make up hypothetical scenarios around him. Skip the next four paragraphs if you don't care.

Gregg looked very poised on Wednesday. He did his job with aplomb. His changeup looks very effective; his slider looks erratic. It's pretty when it works. But he was fortunate to K Josh Hamilton swinging through a gyroball in the strike zone. That won't work all year in the big league. (Right, singular.) I wonder if he should just ditch the breaking ball and only use it for show. I haven't seen much of him, but I feel like he could get by without it. I was a harsh critic of the Gregg signing, and it'll take a lot to convince me he's worth the money. But as a veteran power arm with the ability to get lefties out, he has his uses. Do I trust Cito Gaston to take advantage? I don't want to respond to that question because it might affect Cito's confidence.

On the same topic, I feel like a righty reliever with small reverse splits is a useful bullet to have on a team with lots of lefty starters. Like, consider this You Be The Manager situation.

You're facing the Orioles on the road. Romero started. Baltimore's normal lineup is in, except Luke Scott was given a day off. Bottom of the 8th, two out, Jays up 3-1, Orioles on the corners, DH Nolan Reimold's spot comes up. Baltimore's bench consists of Scott, Neifi Perez, Brad Ausmus and Bubba Crosby. On deck is Matt Wieters, 1-1 with two walks, and coming off a four-homer game last night. In the hole is 1996 Brady Anderson.

If you leave Romero in, he faces Reimold and you lose the platoon battle. If you bring in Downs, at least he's fresh, but the problem persists. If you bring in Frasor, Baltimore will pinch-hit Scott and gain a sizable edge. If you bring in Gregg, who's tougher on lefties, Baltimore should probably just let Reimold bat. But there's a very good chance they will reflexively pinch-hit Scott anyway (gotta protect his confidence!). And thus you might gain the most favorable matchup by bringing in KG. Whether Gregg is actually good enough at pitching to justify putting him in over Frasor and Downs in this situation is another matter entirely. We'll have a better idea in six weeks. Also an open question is how often you can correctly guess what the other manager's strategy is. It's an interesting game theory problem.

Today, the Jays really are in Baltimore for the Orioles' home opener. Brandon Morrow makes his Toronto debut against one of 2009's most surprising breakout stars, Brad Bergesen. There wasn't much in Bergesen's minor-league track record to suggest he could pitch well in the AL East. But he averaged 6.5 innings over 19 starts with 12.5% K, 6.2% BB, 50.1% GB and a very nice 3.43 ERA. He's a sinker-slider guy with sinker-slider splits. To ease him into 2010, the Jays will kindly pencil at least six righty hitters into their lineup.

Morrow will be on an 85-pitch leash. In related news, Morrow's career P/PA sits at 4.1.

Baltimore is 1-2 after stealing the finale of a tightly contested three-game set in Tampa Bay. Wieters is 6/12 with a homer. Brian Roberts is 2/14; Miguel Tejada, 1/12 with two beanballs. 

The O's lineup will probably be Roberts, Jones, Markakis, Tejada, Scott, Wieters, Reimold, Garrett Atkins and Izturis. Their other bats are Wigginton (lefty masher), Lugo (Jay killa), Pie (almost homered off James Shields Tuesday), and backup catcher Craig Tatum (bats right, tears do not cure cancer). Bullpen: Mike Gonzalez*, Jim Johnson, Cla Meredith, Will Ohman*, Matt Albers, Lurch*, and Jason Berken.

Game time is 3:05. I think I've had enough of these weekday games. Orioles are a -135 favorite. Enjoy.
9 April 2010: Small Stakes Ensure You the Minimum Blues | 58 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mike Green - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 09:27 AM EDT (#213348) #
Superb, Alex.  To paraphrase Bette Midler (speaking of her backup band the Harlettes), I laughed, I cried, I violated my parole. 

The game theory question  Dave Trembley is managing.  Does he know/care about reverse splits?  You might guess that he doesn't, but you could probably gather the evidence from his history.  Tango could do it. 

Ryan Day - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 09:39 AM EDT (#213349) #
It may just be a hot streak, but I don't remember Wells having any hot streaks last year, so this is good stuff. He didn't hit more than three homers in a month last year.

He's always been streaky, so I expect a week or two of ground balls and weak flyouts at some point, but Vernon Wells in a groove is a damn good player.
John Northey - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 11:37 AM EDT (#213354) #
April can be so much fun.

It is fun to look at http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/w/wellsve01.shtml and see so much black ink for 2010 for Wells.

Wells has twice as many home runs as anyone else in the AL, tied for the lead in RBI's but is just 2nd in batting average (sigh, no triple crown). He also leads in OBP and Slg% and runs scored and OPS/OPS+ (of course) and total bases. He led in 4 things in 2003 (PA, H, 2B, total bases) and that is it in his career. Sadly the season is more than 3 games long so I doubt he'll gain 8 more leads this year.

Hmm... a 2-1 BB-SO ratio too (OK, it is exactly 2 walks to 1 strikeout). Mix in over 3 chances a game in CF with no errors and there is nothing to worry about here. Might be the last time all year I can say that about Wells so lets enjoy :)

The pitching is saving the team so far - a 149 ERA+ (fewest runs allowed in AL) vs the slackers in offense at just 123 OPS+ (#5 in runs scored).


Guys fighting for the 'Tom Lawless' award (in his final season here he was on the roster and not DL'ed from the start of the season and had his first hit in his final game on July 4th)...

0 Games: Randy Ruiz, McDonald

0 Hits: Those two plus Molina - all other hitters have at least one. I'm betting on McDonald to win this one.

0 pitched games: Accardo, Camp, Valdez & starters Morrow/Eveland - Accardo the most likely 'winner' here.
Hodgie - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 01:00 PM EDT (#213361) #

Jack Moore over at Fangraphs has a quick post looking at VW's fast start (before yesterday's game) and its possible impact on his seasonal line when compared to his CHONE projections.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/vernon-wells-homers-in-the-bank 

John Northey - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 01:13 PM EDT (#213362) #
Just went through Baseball Reference and found...

Last year Vernon had no more than 3 HR in any single MONTH, now he has 4 in 3 games.

In 2008 his peak was 6 in a month, 5 in 2007, 9 in April 2006 (6 was his peak otherwise), 7 in 2005, 8 in Sept '04 (5 his peak otherwise), 6-8 every month in 2003 (sweet), 6 in 2002 (his first season).

A bit surprised at the consistence in 2003. Still, the point is that with any luck he could have his biggest HR month since 2006 and that implies something - either that Texas needs new pitchers or that Wells has something going right at long last. Lets hope eh?
Gerry - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 02:07 PM EDT (#213364) #
No Aaron Hill today.  AGon gets the #2 spot, Johnny Mc in the lineup moves Snider up to #8.
Mike Green - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 02:25 PM EDT (#213366) #
Of course.  It's Flashback Friday.  Bringing you back to the day when your #2 hitter had an OBP under .300.  Those were the days, my friend. 

I guess Cito isn't messaging Tango very much yet.  It's too early in the season for blackberries.

Mick Doherty - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 02:41 PM EDT (#213367) #

Question: How many homers does Wells need to hit to make sure he doesn't get booed at the home opener?

Eleventy-teen. Many will boo him from habit, because they do not engage the soothing, forgiving rhetoric of Da Box. </irony>

Ryan Day - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 03:12 PM EDT (#213371) #
Nah. Sports fans have short memories. If he's leading the league in homers on Monday, they'll cheer. If he pops up with a runner on in the first, they'll boo.
Chuck - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 04:18 PM EDT (#213372) #

Eleventy-teen. 

How about a Brazilian? What's the joke about your onetime Governor asking one of his aides how big a number that was?

China fan - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 04:31 PM EDT (#213373) #
Four innings, 72 pitches, 5 walks....   I guess the reports of Morrow's control issues were not entirely exaggerated....    On the other hand, he's kept the enemy to 2 hits, and he's posted 5 strikeouts.   So there might be something there.  But what is the something?  A new version of David Purcey, with all the teasing and frustrations that went along with all that?   It's too early to say anything, of course, but I have a feeling that Morrow will be the enigma of 2010 -- if he even stays in the majors.
Flex - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 04:57 PM EDT (#213374) #
I'm of a mind that if I don't get too caught up in winning, watching an talented enigma might be fun for a season.
sam - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 05:33 PM EDT (#213375) #

McDonald you're killing me

scottt - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 05:41 PM EDT (#213376) #
I don't mind Gonzo batting 2nd. He's clearly on a streak of his own. I was hoping McCoy would have been back at 2B though.

It's so-so for Morrow and too bad for Janssen.

I bet Johnny Mac faces Gonzales.

sam - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 05:41 PM EDT (#213377) #
And attaboy Travis!
sam - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 05:43 PM EDT (#213378) #
Bunt strikes!
scottt - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 05:49 PM EDT (#213379) #
I don't remember the Jays ever hitting so many sac-flies. New trend?

scottt - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 05:52 PM EDT (#213380) #
No Gonzalez-Gonzalez matchup? Bummer!
John Northey - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 06:05 PM EDT (#213381) #
Sweet - another come from behind win and Gregg puts in his resume for the closer job.

So, the last guy in the lineup award who was here opening day will go to Ruiz whenever he gets to play. For last pitcher to throw a pitch we are down to Accardo and Valdez (and technically Eveland but he starts tomorrow). McDonald going 0 for 3 keeps him in the 'race' for the Tom Lawless 'last hit in the majors for a guy on an opening day roster' award.
Alex Obal - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 06:07 PM EDT (#213382) #
And lo and behold, the very intimidating KG makes Tejada look like an idiot with sliders to finish up a spotless ninth inning. What do I know.

I was wondering when the outfield defense was going to rear its head. Now I can stop wondering.

Can't believe Baltimore didn't bring in Meredith to face [a] the righty Bautista when [b] they needed to prevent a sac fly and [c] Gonzalez was doing his best impression of Morrow's first inning.

When Morrow can spot his fastball and get ahead in the count, he looks untouchable.
Alex Obal - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 06:14 PM EDT (#213383) #
And how about Travis Snider. He had a nice game in the 8-hole. Anyone think he looks more comfortable there than 9th?
scottt - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 06:15 PM EDT (#213384) #
Another win with an intact lineup.

I guess Accardo is the long man now. Would make sense, Cito thought he was a starter last year.

There's always a chance that someone else catch the flu and Ruiz gets a start, but I wouldn't bet on that.



China fan - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 06:20 PM EDT (#213385) #
Kevin Gregg:  17 pitches, 12 strikes, 2 strikeouts.  Baseball seems like a very simple game sometimes -- throw strikes and let them try to hit it.
Hodgie - Friday, April 09 2010 @ 09:09 PM EDT (#213388) #

It was really a tale of two games for Mr. Morrow.

1st inning:

1IP 1H 3R 3ER 4BB 1K 1HBP 35-18 Pitches-strikes

Innings 2-5:

4IP 3H 2R 2ER 1BB 4K 49-32 Pitches-strikes

I know he has a history of sporadic control, but could it not have also just been a case of nerves in his first start for a new team? After that first inning disaster, other than he who has lied about this age and usage of PEDs (how does he even have a job again?), no-one else seemed to have an answer for Morrow once he found the plate.

Magpie - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 04:00 AM EDT (#213390) #
Cito thought [Accardo] was a starter last year.

Remind me, I've forgotten. Exactly how many games did Gaston have Accardo start last year?
92-93 - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 04:21 AM EDT (#213391) #
He said in spring training 2009 they were going to be stretching Accardo out, most likely because he didn't know the difference between Accardo and Janssen.
Magpie - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 05:07 AM EDT (#213392) #
Sure, and did they actually stretch him out?

Managers say a lot of stuff. It should almost always be taken with a heaping tablespoon of salt. An unexpected requirement of the job is to say stuff, every damn day. Because every day guys come around pestering them to say things.

There have always been managers, from McGraw to Stengel to LaRussa, who figures out how to manipulate the press, generally into singing the praises of his genius. But really - almost all of them just say any thing that pops into their heads at the moment so long as they don't think is going to cause them any actual trouble. And otherwise they don't really give a damn.
ComebyDeanChance - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 11:06 AM EDT (#213394) #
He said in spring training 2009 they were going to be stretching Accardo out, most likely because he didn't know the difference between Accardo and Janssen.

Maybe Keith Law hadn't tweeted it.

One thing's for sure, he likely has enough of a life that he doesn't spend 24/7 online looking for some petty dig to make in order to build himself up.
China fan - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 11:10 AM EDT (#213395) #
Magpie, I fully agree with you, but it's an unwinnable battle because the "Cito is an idiot" crowd will always search for something new to use against him.  They were sneering at the decision to put Snider in the 9th slot in the lineup until it became pretty clear that it was an appropriate spot for him, especially at the beginning of the season.  As for the Accardo comment by Gaston, it was nothing more than a throwaway comment, a casual remark that Accardo might have the capacity to go for longer than an inning or two, and it's absurd to dredge it up as evidence of anything.
scottt - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 11:14 AM EDT (#213396) #
The Tourette defense does not work for Cito. That's what he said, live with it.

Personally, I think nothing destroys the confidence of players like their managers making absurd comments about them. Obviously, that's just my opinion.

Now, to other funny things.

Bullpens are falling apart left and right. Texas, Baltimore, Kansas City, but also in Boston where there's a slight feeling of panic.

Is today the last day that counts for the first player of the week nomination?  V-Dub absolutely needs to win that.

Gerry - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 11:39 AM EDT (#213397) #

Morrow, from Bastians blog:

Morrow looked pretty sharp the rest of the way, minus what he admittedly called a "stupid pitch" to Miguel Tejada in the fifth inning. Why did he describe the offering as such?  "It was a changeup and I don't throw changeups to right-handed hitters," he said. "That's why I called it a stupid pitch."

"I should have shook him off," said Morrow, referring to the times catcher John Buck called for the changeups in those situations.

This seems incredible to me for many reasons:

These guys just spent two months together in Florida, could they not have figured that out then?

The catcher is supposed to know what the pitcher likes to throw in what situation, Morrow is basically saying that Buck doesn't know him.

Before the game the pitcher and catcher and the pitching coach are supposed to get together and figure out how to approach each hitter.  I assume the subject of change-ups to right handed hitters never came up.

Magpie - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 12:10 PM EDT (#213398) #
The Tourette defense

That would be cheap and offensive, if it weren't just so out-and-out weird (Tourette's is a nervous disorder characterized by physical tics and twitches.)

What you really mean is that he's just a dumb Texan.
92-93 - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 01:46 PM EDT (#213400) #
One thing's for sure, he likely has enough of a life that he doesn't spend 24/7 online looking for some petty dig to make in order to build himself up.

The amusing thing is that the only person making a petty dig here is you, but I guess that's hard to see from your high horse. I was answering Magpie's question, what were you adding? And for the record, I live in my mother's attic, not the basement. Keep on defending.
92-93 - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 01:57 PM EDT (#213401) #
They were sneering at the decision to put Snider in the 9th slot in the lineup until it became pretty clear that it was an appropriate spot for him

Three poor games doesn't validate a decision (especially when the team isn't trying to compete), so I don't know how you think "it became pretty clear". If having MLB experience is a requirement to doubt Cito, it should be known that Alan Ashby thinks Cito is completely destroying Snider's confidence by batting him 9th, and doesn't understand what is being gained by the move when it has him batting behind John Buck and Alex Gonzalez.
Spifficus - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 02:23 PM EDT (#213403) #
it should be known that Alan Ashby thinks Cito is completely destroying Snider's confidence by batting him 9th

Why is the position of where a very young hitter hits in the order in the last year of Cito's managerial career in a year where there is no expectation of contention a source of such contention? It's not going to cost him an appreciable number of at bats vs hitting seventh. He's playing everyday. This is what he needs to develop more than anything, and he's getting it. As for the hitting 9th but, Cito has his theory and Ashby has his. Again, he's in the lineup, and that is they key for his development.

stevieboy22 - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 02:53 PM EDT (#213404) #
Cito placing rookie hitters in the 9 hole is ironic when you think about.......

He does it because he believes it will put them into a position to gain confidence. But with Snider, it appears to do the opposite.

What happened to 11 months ago, when everyone thought Cito was a genius? I have to admit, I was in that group...
Mike Green - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 05:21 PM EDT (#213406) #
Nice lineup tonight.  I like Snider batting 8th at this point.  I remember Bobby Cox batting Jesse Barfield 8th in the order in 1985.  At the time, I thought that it was crazy as Jesse had, in my view, conquered his strike zone issues in 1984.  I still think that it was overly cautious, but Snider, 2009 is a whole other story.  He still hasn't shown a reasonable ability to make contact yet.  You can always move him up in the order in July. 
greenfrog - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 05:36 PM EDT (#213407) #
FYI: Sabathia has a no-hitter going through 7 against TB. The defense has been excellent behind him, including great diving stops by Teixeira and A-Rod over the last couple of innings.
Chuck - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 06:26 PM EDT (#213408) #
But with Snider, it appears to do the opposite.

And you can discern this how exactly?
92-93 - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 06:52 PM EDT (#213409) #
Spifficus, to me the fact that they have no plans on contending is why i'm upset with Snider batting 9th. I would understand the team caring about his spot in the order if every win was precious, and it was imperative to have the best batting order possible. However, you yourself admit there's little hope of contention, so why not bat the kid 7th or even 8th and NOT send the message of - "you're my #9 until you prove yourself otherwise"? The kid has been the best hitter everywhere he has ever been, and it can't be a positive for his confidence to bat 9th in the order and be constantly worried that after a couple of weeks of futility he might get sent back to AAA. For me (and I presume Alan Ashby), the message of "don't worry kid, just go out and be yourself" is much better received when you don't place your top prospect in the #9 spot behind 2 mediocre hitters. I just don't understand what is gained by having him bat 9th.
ayjackson - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 06:59 PM EDT (#213410) #

I live in my mother's attic, not the basement

Ooo, now who's on the high horse??  ; )

Spifficus - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 07:15 PM EDT (#213411) #
That's quite the assumption on the messaging, and may or may not have any basis in reality. I have no problem with hitting him 9th, or 8th, or whatever low in the lineup - I see it as the hitter's version of the Earl Weaver approach to inexperienced pitchers. #9 in the order is Gaston's version of middle relief. At the very least, it's a viable theory, and I don't understand why so many people are letting this become an outlet for Gaston bashing (I'm sure he'll give us lots of reasons as the season goes along).

Anyway, we're 4 games into the season. Can we wait a little while before we assume that this former good makeup kid has had his confidence shattered because he had to hit 9th? It seems like a silly notion to me, that someone who hasn't spent a full season in the majors yet should be crushed because he's not in a better spot in the order without having put up any extended performance to earn it first. That said, if he were to be put in the 7th slot tomorrow and left there for the year... sure. Why not? Either way, he's getting his at bats.
scottt - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 07:21 PM EDT (#213412) #
Sox are benching Ortiz so that Martinez can DH while Varitek is catching. Ortiz is having another slow start and got ejected for arguing a strike in his last game.

There is less pressure batting 9th (or 8th). The player knows that if he was batting better he'd probably be moved up, but he doesn't need that to evaluate his performance. I see no problem there. Lind is 3rd, Overbay is 5th, so Snider should be anywhere from 7th to 9th, just to balance the lineup.

Magpie - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 08:33 PM EDT (#213413) #
Alan Ashby thinks Cito is completely destroying Snider's confidence by batting him 9th

If Travis Snider's confidence is that fragile, he has no hope whatsoever of ever being a major league player. Ashby should know better. He hit ninth himself often enough.
Thomas - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 09:39 PM EDT (#213414) #
The Jays had two winning streaks of four games or more last year. Let's savour this.
Thomas - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 09:42 PM EDT (#213415) #
If Travis Snider's confidence is that fragile, he has no hope whatsoever of ever being a major league player. Ashby should know better. He hit ninth himself often enough.

Agreed. I wouldn't bat him 9th right now, but if he's playing everyday there's really not too much to complain about until he starts really hitting. If batting him behind Alex Gonzalez and John Buck for a month destroys his confidence than he was never the prospect we thought he was.

Spifficus - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 09:49 PM EDT (#213416) #
The Jays had two winning streaks of four games or more last year. Let's savour this.

I agree. There was a lot of things to enjoy tonight. For me, the solid contact Encarnacion and Snider were making were particular points of emphasis, as was Eveland's strong outing.

I missed the beginning of the telecast. Anyone know why Martinez wasn't working the game?

Magpie - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 09:59 PM EDT (#213417) #
behind Alex Gonzalez and John Buck for a month

If Snider actually starts hitting, it might not take quite that long. When Gaston returned on 22 June 2008, he stuck Adam Lind in the lineup every day, at the bottom of the order (unless John McDonald or a pitcher was in the lineup.) Lind made his last appearance in that spot on July 19 (though a week earlier he'd been bumped up to 7th for a couple of games.) By the beginning of August, six weeks after it began, Lind was hitting fifth.

Snider is quite a bit younger than Lind was in 2008, and Gaston may very well proceed more cautiously.
greenfrog - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 10:07 PM EDT (#213418) #
Some observations from tonight's game:

- The Jays seem to be in pretty good shape with Frasor, Downs, and Gregg anchoring the bullpen (especially if Janssen and Accardo have good seasons behind them). It would be great to see Frasor rack up 30 saves or so and qualify as a Type A FA.

- Molina looked solid behind the plate. Obviously it's a small sample size, but both Eveland and Frasor seemed to settle down nicely after Molina's trips to the mound. He also made a nice throw to gun down Izturis.

- Eveland also looked very capable. He changed speeds nicely and mostly hit his spots. He'll likely get hit hard some nights, but if he can give the Jays 180-220 league-average innings at the back of the rotation, I'm sure AA will be thrilled.

- A-Gon looks very solid defensively.

- Bautista and E5 have very long swings.

- Wells seems to be making a conscious effort to lay off pitches out of the zone (he has four walks already in five games - a 130-walk pace for the year). It will be interesting to see if he exceeds his usual 40-55 walks per season.
Matthew E - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 10:37 PM EDT (#213419) #
What if Gaston bats Snider ninth but doesn't pinch-hit for him? Would that even things out for his confidence?

Confidence confidence confidence confidence. Word has lost all meaning.

scottt - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 10:47 PM EDT (#213420) #
Bautista is not hitting, but he's walking. That's pretty much what I was expecting. I don't think he'll finished the year with 150 walks, but he'll get hot with the bat here and there.

So far Gonzo is contributing with the bat nicely. That won't last, let's enjoy this for now.

Another win without using the bench. Well, with Hill sitting injured, there's only Ruiz worth using. Overbay's split 2/12 0/7 

It's not just a 4 game winning streak, it's one on the road.

I have no idea about Valdez, but the rest of the bullpen looks strong. Potential is there.

Marcum goes for the sweep tomorrow.

Magpie - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 11:13 PM EDT (#213421) #
if he can give the Jays 180-220 league-average innings at the back of the rotation, I'm sure AA will be thrilled.

Thrilled? I think he'll be the giddiest schoolboy in the Western world if he gets that from anybody, never mind the guy he picked up for some spare change. This team doesn't have one single pitcher who has ever done that, even once.

Romero did come very close last year - he worked 178 IP.
Gerry - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 11:21 PM EDT (#213422) #

Buck Martinez is committed to TBS this weekend.

I would have left Downs in for the ninth, he hasn't worked much and he only faced one hitter in the eighth.

Spifficus - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 11:36 PM EDT (#213423) #
Thanks Gerry.
greenfrog - Saturday, April 10 2010 @ 11:49 PM EDT (#213424) #
"This team doesn't have one single pitcher who has ever done that, even once."

It's true, it's a long shot. But Eveland gave Oakland 168 innings of 4.34 ERA baseball in 2008 (Eveland's first full season in the majors). Eveland is only 26, so if he stays healthy, it seems reasonable that he could pitch 180+ innings in 2010. However, he still has a long way to go before he establishes his durability and ability to pitch consistently against tough lineups.
92-93 - Sunday, April 11 2010 @ 05:45 AM EDT (#213426) #
I would have left Downs in for the ninth, he hasn't worked much and he only faced one hitter in the eighth.

Me too, and I was hoping that the insurance run Lind drove in might have an effect on the RP sent out for the 9th. At the very least I thought Downs would be kept in to face the lefthanded Markakis, fresh off four days of rest and a 2 pitch 8th inning. It's a nice problem to have when your back 3 relievers have only made one appearance in five games and appear underworked. With Frasor now having thrown 20-x-16-16 in the last 4 days, I'd be surprised if Cito went back to him in Sunday afternoon's game should the need arise. As an aside, Buck was commenting on Friday about the difference in body language between Frasor and Gregg on the mound, and it's pretty easy to see. A reliever that combined Frasor's stuff with Gregg's mettle would be one hell of a closer.
scottt - Sunday, April 11 2010 @ 06:42 AM EDT (#213427) #
It's good to have Downs ready to go on days Marcum or Morrow are starting. That could work out fine.



scottt - Sunday, April 11 2010 @ 06:46 AM EDT (#213428) #
There's an easy way for reliever to project confidence on the mound; facial hair.
9 April 2010: Small Stakes Ensure You the Minimum Blues | 58 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.