Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

Former Marlins and Cubs closer Kevin Gregg has agreed to a one-year deal with the Toronto Blue Jays according to SI.com's Jon Heyman.  The $2.75-million dollar deal includes two option years that could pay as much as $12-million dollars total.  Gregg is expected to compete with Jason Frasor and lefty Scott Downs for the closer's role but the Toronto Sun's Bob Elliott speculates Downs could be on his way out.  A tip of the Jays 1989 road cap to Bauxite "The Original Ryan" for letting us know.



Kevin Gregg joins his fourth major league team in what will be his eighth season in the bigs.  The 31 year-old righty was a 15th round selection in the 1996 amateur draft out of high school in Corvalis, Oregon.  He didn't reach the majors until 2003 with the Anaheim Angels when he signed with them as a six-year minor league free agent.   Gregg began his pro career as a starter and reached Triple-A Vancouver in 1999 where he won his lone start by allowing just two runs over five innings.  He endured a rough ride at Double-A Midland  in which he went 5-14 with a 6.40 ERA and that saw him spend more time in the Midland bullpen in 2001 and 2002 where his ERA hovered around 4.50.  He got another taste of Triple-A ball with Sacramento but a 7.52 ERA in eight starts and eight relief appearances resulted in the A's letting him go.  However, Gregg found new life with the Halos in 2003 by winning a combined 11 games in Double-A Arkansas and Triple-A Salt Lake.

Three of his five appearances with the Angels came as a starter in '03 and he won back to back starts in September against the Royals and the Mariners with one-run, seven inning efforts.  He finished the year with a 2-0 record and a 3.28 earned run average.  The 2004 season saw the 6-foot-6, 200-pound Gregg establish himself in the Halos bullpen as he went 5-2 with a 4.21 ERA and one save while striking out 84 hitters in 87 2/3 innings.  However, he unleashed 13 wild pitches to finish second in the American League.   He did earn some post-season experience in 2004 and 2005 by pitching two scoreless innings against the Red Sox and White Sox each season.  Gregg made a combined 65 appearances with ERA's of 5.04 and 4.14 in 2005 and 2006 before he was traded to Florida in the off-season for fellow righty Chris Resop.

Gregg became the Marlins eventual closer after Jorge Julio and Henry Owens failed to hold the job.  He had a record of 0-5 but he converted 32 out of 36 save opportunities with a 3.54 ERA by striking out 87 batters in 84 innings.  In 2008, Gregg collected 29 saves for the Fish but his record was 7-8 and he blew nine save opportunities.  He struck out less than a batter an inning by whiffing just 58 in 68 2/3 innings.  He also missed time that year with a knee injury that sidelined him at the end of August.

Gregg was on the move again as he was traded to the Chicago Cubs for minor league righty Jose Ceda in the off-season.  He beat out Carlos Marmol to become the Cubs closer and replace the departed Kerry Wood, who signed with Cleveland.  Gregg did pick up 23 saves in 2009 but the long ball hurt him as he surrendered 13 homers in 68 2/3 innings.  He was eventually replaced by Marmol as the club's closer in mid-August.  He won five of 11 decisions with an ERA of 4.72 but he was back to averaging a strikeout an inning by ringing up 71 batters.

Fangraphs.com clocks Gregg's fastball around 91-92 miles per hour and he also throws a slider and splitter in the low 80's range. 


In former Jays news involving Kevins......

Former Jay Kevin Mench is back in North America as he signs a minor league deal with the Washington Nationals.  Natsfarm.com points out Mench could very well wind up with the Nats Triple-A affiliate in Syracuse which is where he spent time in 2008 during his less than one year tenure in Toronto.  Mench spent the 2009 season in Japan with the Hanshin Tigers after a 2008 campaign that saw him bat .243 and slug .357 with no homers and ten runs batted in with Toronto.

Former Jay Kevin Millar is looking to extend his major league career with the Chicago Cubs after signing a minor league pact.  The 36 year-old  Millar hit .223 and slugged .363 with seven homers and 29 RBI with Toronto last season.


In other former Jays news not Kevin-related.....

Former Jay Orlando Hudson and the Washington Nationals are trying to see eye to eye on a new deal.  "O-Dog" batted .283 with nine homers and 62 RBI with the Dodgers in 2009.


And finally.......

Play-by-play announcer Jerry Howarth appeared on XM/Sirius MLB Home Plate yesterday.

Among the highlights......

  • Roy Halladay is the best Blue Jay to wear the uniform due to his work ethic and passed up free agency to stay with the club for as long as he did
  • Robbie Alomar should have been in the Hall of Fame and took issues with voters who didn't vote and those who held the John Hirschbeck spitting incident against him.  He says Alomar and Willie Mays are the two best players he has seen.
  • Jack Morris and Bert Blyleven should also be in the Hall.  He points to Morris being the winningest pitcher of the 80's as the big reason he should be in.
  • Tom Cheek's time will come when it comes to the Ford C. Frick award and points out his 27 1/2 seasons of not missing a game behind the microphone.  He calls his former partner the "signature voice of the Jays".
  • Safeco Field is his favourite place to call a game.
Keeping Up With The Kevins | 69 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
TamRa - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 02:49 AM EST (#211571) #

(reposted from other thread)


First lets get this off the table: Jose Valverde would like to remind you that offering arb to a middling reliever, let alone a good closer, is a fool's gamble. do that and you WON'T get draft picks because no one is giving up a pick for Kevin-f'n- Gregg.

Second, we have enough arms that if Roenicke needed to be in AAA he would have been.

Third - what team gives up a good prospect for Frasor when THEY could have signed Gregg? Not to say Frasor isn't better, he clearly (to me) IS - but is he ENOUGH better than someone gives up a solid prospect for the difference? I doubt it seriously. Downs maybe but only because he's left handed.

Forth (referencing a different post) - Even Gregg's "good" season was pretty marginal. His best ERA+ was 127. for reference, Frasor's was 173 last year. Even Shawn Camp's was 124 and against tougher competition.


This is a total "WTF?" moment for me. Even if we are dealing from our depth we have more than enough arms to make this move unnecessary. We now have at least a dozen legitimate candidates for the 'pen
brent - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 03:31 AM EST (#211572) #
Gregg has some funky reverse splits here and those gopher balls are here
Mike Green - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 09:17 AM EST (#211574) #
As per the "Reed" thread, let me add to the reviews of the Gregg acquisition.  Two thumbs down.  If there is any money owed Gregg for 2011 and 2012 by reason of the options, the deal goes from bad to vile. 

Gregg was a mediocre pitcher in the NL Central.  He's likely to be less than that in the AL East.  Nothing personal. 
christaylor - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 09:42 AM EST (#211578) #
I don't get it. On par with the J-Mac decision, perhaps worse -- I can't find any definitive answer via googling whether the two options are to be: player (horrible), mutual/team or performance based.

Can we somehow blame Cito for this one? I don't buy that a deal is in the works for the other relievers as their value is pretty marginal; unless there's a team AA has found who is willing to do a salary dump for a couple relievers with a player/pitcher coming back to the Jays who could be a useful piece at the deadline (innings eater?).
Ryan Day - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 09:53 AM EST (#211579) #
I don't get it. The Jays are swimming in relievers, and Gregg's not all that impressive. Gregg may have picked up Intangible Closer Mojo with his 85 career saves, but I can't see how he's more qualified to close than Frasor, Downs, or possibly even Roenicke or Accardo.
Matthew E - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 10:09 AM EST (#211580) #
I wonder if Anthopoulos signed him to give Cito someone expendable to overwork.
dan gordon - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 10:12 AM EST (#211581) #
Yikes!  Gregg has 16 blown saves in the last 2 years.  Home runs and walks - not a good combination.  The few leads the Jays get this year just got a lot more precarious.  I'm getting flashbacks to Miguel Bautista. 
Brent S - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 10:15 AM EST (#211582) #
My only inkling would be that AA figures that Gregg would be worth at least a B-grade FA compensation return next off-season. The only problem is in the case that Gregg re-qualifies as a A-grade FA, I cannot see any team shelling out a first round draft pick to sign him.

Best case scenario: Gregg supplies a year of decent bullpen support, qualifies as a "B", and signs with another team next year.

mathesond - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 10:32 AM EST (#211584) #
I have to admit, I'm as baffled as everyone. I guess AA subscribes to the theory that you can never have too much pitching...but Kevin Gregg? Maybe he'll bring some intangibles to the 'pen if/when Downs and/or Frasor are traded. Although personally, I'd prefer a 96 MPH fastball with movement, and a wicked slider
Geoff - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 10:40 AM EST (#211585) #
In case anyone hasn't heard, the Jays are going to be ditching their old FieldTurf they bought back in 2005. Out with the old, in with the older. Welcome to the new age of AstroTurf at the Dome, er... Centre.

Story

Some of the reasoning for the change? This new AstroTurf won't show as many seams and therefore will visually look better. I seem to recall the big selling point of FieldTurf was that it would look and feel more "like natural grass". As it turns out, the expected eight-year lifespan of FieldTurf ended after five years.
Jevant - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 11:40 AM EST (#211588) #
To be honest, that's my feeling as well.

Must be a precursor to a trade, probably involving Downs.

It's a low-risk deal, in my opinion.  And we don't care if we blow his arm out.

Mike Green - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 12:24 PM EST (#211590) #
And we don't care if we blow his arm out.

Ah, yes, the Stringer Bell/Billy Martin theory of management.  Surely this theory might ultimately lead to make your club less appealing for free agent pitchers down the line, leaving aside all thorny questions of ethics.
Chuck - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 12:35 PM EST (#211591) #
Does that make the Gregg signing a Wire deal?
John Northey - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 12:41 PM EST (#211592) #
Interesting that they are changing the surface. The story reads as suggesting that some of the fielding issues might have been due to the turf not working well at this stage. Might be interesting to see home/road stats for defensive efficiency (don't feel like hunting it down right now).
Matthew E - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 01:17 PM EST (#211594) #

I just saw on the TSN website that Hayhurst is having "exploratory shoulder surgery" and won't be ready for spring training.

Sour.

Ryan Day - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 01:19 PM EST (#211596) #
Well, you can possibly remove one pitcher from the bullpen mix: Dirk Hayhurst is having shoulder surgery.

Unfortunate news - I thought Hayhurst had some solid potential, and he seems like a great guy to have around.
christaylor - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 01:24 PM EST (#211597) #
"Surely this theory might ultimately lead to make your club less appealing for free agent pitchers down the line, leaving aside all thorny questions of ethics."

AA has to say to every FA "you're special" and woo them any way and if they balk at past usage of other pitchers, dissimulate. Some overly honest fool said something about truth/lying in baseball being relative to what one knows to be true-- that seems to fit this situation.

The ethics of the situation are complicated by: management wants to maximize wins/profit for the team, fans want to maximize wins / WS titles and the players want to maximize total income / wins for the teams they play for... yup, thorny. My feeling is that it isn't the military, a pitcher won't go to jail for insubordination and, if truly good enough, will find a job even if they're labelled as a club house cancer and dumped (see: Hillenbrand, Shea).

Lastly, saying this team needs "innings eaters" is not all that different from saying "the team needs a few expendable pitchers". Saying it in terms of "innings eaters" that way just couches the situation positively, that the team is truly looking out for the youngsters.
Mike Green - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 02:14 PM EST (#211598) #
Saying you want an innings-eater is not the same thing as "not caring whether a pitcher injures his arm".  There are pitchers who have thrown 220 innings for several years, and there may be indeed reason to believe that these pitchers can safely throw 200 innings than a pitcher who has never thrown more than 100. 



Alex Obal - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 07:48 PM EST (#211604) #
This is a bad signing.

I apologize for shooting fish in a barrel. I just want to get my opinion down in writing, for future reference.
Ron - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 08:15 PM EST (#211605) #

I thought I was confused after watching Lost last night but I’m much
more confused about this signing. A team with a financially stingy ownership
that might lose 90 games this season has no business wasting money on a “closer”.
Kevin Gregg isn’t going to sell tickets or help the ballclub win. He was so
awful with the Cubs they removed him from the closer role during the season. So
the Jays have no problem giving a mediocre reliever like Gregg 2.75 million
dollars but have trouble signing their top draft picks over a couple hundred thousand
dollars. It doesn’t make any sense. I would rather see the Jays give the 2.75 million
to the Jays Care Foundation than to piss it away like this. And we don’t even
have more information about the 2 option years. It’s going to be much worse if
it’s player controlled or vests based on saves or innings pitched.

brent - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 09:49 PM EST (#211610) #
I am going to go with good signing (as long as he only faces lefties ^^).
Spifficus - Wednesday, February 03 2010 @ 11:02 PM EST (#211612) #
I'm taking this signing with an 'another shoe is going to drop' mentality. Given the current roster construction, it doesn't make a lot of sense, but knock Frasor or Downs out of the pecking order, and it's a decent addition. He's not as bad as the righty homeritis indicates last year. He had some tired arm syndrom in August, and had an abnormally bad year against righties. Assuming the tired arm isn't anything more, he can be a very useful piece in a bullpen, one that has trade value at the deadline. Now, if neither Frasor or Downs are moved, then Gregg is a bit of a luxury, one that could cost someone of more long term value a 40 man spot. I've got time to find out, though.
scottt - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 06:21 AM EST (#211615) #
I suppose those options carry over and make him more difficult to trade?



brent - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 08:15 AM EST (#211616) #
We're going to be glad to have all of those bodies around Spring Training once arms begin to fall off. We've already down the Garfoose. Who's next? I'll be surprised if the team will be like last year sending down a more talented player in the bullpen just because he had options (Acorn). 
rpriske - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 08:29 AM EST (#211617) #

Kevin Gregg is better than people give him credit for being.

Is he a shoe-in closer? No, but neither are Frasor or Downs. If this a precursor to a trade... fine. If he bumps Camp or Accardo... fine. He is better than both.

 

Personally, I hope this means Downs is moving and we get something for him before he totally falls apart.

Paul D - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 12:01 PM EST (#211622) #

I'm not convinced that he's better than Accardo.

Ryan Day - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 12:09 PM EST (#211623) #
I'm not sure  he's even better than Camp, who was pretty solid in 2009. Gregg's been walking 4 per 9ip in the National League, which doesn't seem likely to improve facing the Yankees & Red Sox regularly. And Camp is at least more useful as a multi-inning reliever - he pitched 79 innings over 59 games, while Gregg spread his 68 innings over 72 games.
VBF - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 01:03 PM EST (#211624) #

With MLB calling out the Marlins' pocketed shared revenues and (if I recall correctly) the Pirates too, this could be very much be a move to appease Bud Selig.  A 60 million dollar payroll is probably approaching the point of generating a small profit, once you factor in all revenue streams. So if you had to add an unnecessary player to the team to keep the welfare cheques coming in, you probably could worse than a mediocre relief pitcher.

VBF - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 01:05 PM EST (#211625) #

With MLB calling out the Marlins' pocketed shared revenues and (if I recall correctly) the Pirates too, this could be very much be a move to appease Bud Selig.  A 60 million dollar payroll is probably approaching the point of generating a small profit, once you factor in all revenue streams. So if you had to add an unnecessary player to the team to keep the welfare cheques coming in, you probably could worse than a mediocre relief pitcher.

Moe - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 01:17 PM EST (#211626) #
this could be very much be a move to appease Bud Selig.

I don't think the Jays have to be too concerned about this. Until recently they had a sizable payroll and as long it goes back up after a few rebuilding years, no one is going to say much. These cycles are normal for rebuilding teams and, imo, are one of the main reasons why a pay-roll floor is a really bad idea (I don't think anyone has mentioned a moving average (say 5 years?) pay-roll floor).



Mike Green - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 01:39 PM EST (#211627) #
Maybe they'll try to move Gregg back to the rotation.  He has no noticeable platoon split over his career.  If you start the season with a rotation of Marcum, Romero, Gregg, Purcey and Richmond, you can send Cecil and Zep back to triple A for service time reasons.

I am not saying that it is right, but at least there is a logic to it.

Ryan Day - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 02:47 PM EST (#211629) #
That's insane, but at least it's more interesting than signing a so-so closer. Actually, it  might not even be that insane - it doesn't look like he was a particularly poor starter, with some decent seasons in the minors.

Not gonna happen, though - indications on the Jays site all say "closer".

Mike Green - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 03:42 PM EST (#211630) #
Not gonna happen, though - indications on the Jays site all say "closer".

Yeah.  I am trying to give AA the benefit of doubt.  How about saying he's made 2 head-scratching moves, both of which are fairly minor?  Those moves would be the McDonald and Gregg signings. 
Thomas - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 05:28 PM EST (#211631) #
I already commented in the prior thread where the signing was announced, but I just want to comment again that I give the Gregg signing a failing grade (and make sure my opinion on this can be found easily by Jays fans a century from now).

Even if Hayhurst is lost for the season due to TJ (and we won't know that at the earliest until tomorrow), the team still has a surplus of relievers. Downs, Frasor, Camp, Accardo, Roenicke, Tallet and Carlson is a bullpen in itself.

Even if one of those guys is traded and you slot Gregg into his spot, the team still has the leftovers from the starting rotation (Richmond, perhaps? Purcey?), Valdez, Zinicola, and Janssen. On top of that they have Henn, Zack Jackson, Broadway, Register and anybody that begins to distinguish himself at Triple-A next year. I'm not arguing Gregg isn't better than this latter group, but I don't think it's worth the price.

I'm fine with treading water with Buck and Alex Gonzalez, but this isn't a treading water move.
vw_fan17 - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 06:24 PM EST (#211632) #
Bastian tweets that both options are CLUB options. Phew.
Parker - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 09:26 PM EST (#211633) #

Also according to Bastian (via Twitter) the deal hasn't yet been finalized and is currently held up by "some routine physical-related steps"... here's hoping the Jays find a reason to back out of the deal.

Ryan Day - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 09:45 PM EST (#211634) #
It's disappointing that the Jays seem to have forgotten so quickly how to build a cheap and effective bullpen. Just go back to 2007, when the bullpen for most of the season was Accardo, Janssen, Downs, Tallet, Frasor, and Wolfe - all turned in solid seasons, and Downs was the most expensive reliever (not counting BJ) at just over $1 million. In 2008, they added Carlson and Camp for next to nothing.

I know that you sometimes you get what you pay for - hello Jeff Tam - but they're now spending a lot of money on a bunch of guys who are probably interchangeable.

jgadfly - Thursday, February 04 2010 @ 11:31 PM EST (#211635) #
TamRa - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 02:30 AM EST (#211636) #
Even if Hayhurst is lost for the season due to TJ

Thomas i agree with your overall post but - point of order - Hayhurst is having the shoulder checked on, that's not TJ territory.

Not nitpicking - just don't want someone who doesn't know picking up on this and running with it.


Richard S.S. - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 06:32 AM EST (#211637) #

From Marcum, Romero, Morrow, Rzepczynski, Cecil - whom do you trade?   From Purcey, Mills, Ray, Richmond, McGowan - whom do you trade?   From Downs, Frasor, Tallet, Accardo, Camp - whom do you trade? 

From each group you must trade one.   From that group of three, find a trade.   We need a Shortstop (core) and a Right Fielder (core).   Who's got what?   Signing Gregg means A.A. is working on something. let's see if we can figure it out. 

scottt - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 06:37 AM EST (#211638) #
Gregg is no prospect. We all know just how good he is. So the question is not if he's better than Accardo, but can Accardo be better than him?

Yeah, definitively, but Accardo hasn't shown consistency yet. Still, the team not being built to compete, why build up the pen now?

I really don't like these talks of service years when discussing pitchers. We've lost more pitchers to injuries than free agency. Does it make sense to have them wear their arms down in the minor?  You can only have so many guys on the 25 roster anyway.

Mike Green - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 09:46 AM EST (#211639) #
Zep has had all of 16 AA/AAA starts.  To send him down for half a season would be totally normal, except that he has been successful wherever he has pitched, including the majors. 

Brett Cecil has thrown the grand sum of 217 innings over his minor league career, spanning essentially 2 seasons, and has not yet had success at triple A.  I think a lot of him, but if you were to send him down to work on his command/composure, no one would bat an eyelash. 

Sending a pitcher down for service time reasons (when there are legitimate developmental reasons to do so) is something that teams ought to do more of. 

Thomas - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 10:40 AM EST (#211640) #
Thomas i agree with your overall post but - point of order - Hayhurst is having the shoulder checked on, that's not TJ territory.

I was just saying even if there's a worse-case scenario with Hayhurst, the Jays still have ample arms in the pen. But I understand the clarification to make sure false rumours aren't spread.

I agree with Mike about service time. I think you saw elements of that debate play out in the discussion here on our opinions of where Morrow could and should be pitching in early 2010.

Moe - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 10:46 AM EST (#211641) #
I'm not as against this signing as most here. At least I want to see the details of the contract. The way I see it, this is a gamble on trying to find a nugget.
1. If he has a great season, you pick up the option (and trade him)
2. If he has a so-so season, he should be type B FA. Then you buy him out and offer arbitration. If he declines, you get a pick. If he takes it, you have another cheap reliever next year. As far as I know, bonuses and buy-outs don't count as the base salary for abitration, so you might look at 1.75m (my guess for 2.75 minus buy-out and signing bonus) +/- 20%.
3. He has a bad year, well then you lost.


John Northey - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 11:40 AM EST (#211642) #
Gregg is nothing special but the net risk is $2.75 million which won't affect the budget one way or the other this year. I don't see much point to the signing, but if he has a great start he becomes trade bait for something 1/2 decent mid-season. If not then he eats a few innings and saves the Jays from calling up too many kids too quickly (in theory).

I can see better use of that cash, but if it is used to clear out Frasor or Downs or someone else making $1+ million then the cost goes down further and the Jays might end up with a useful prospect. Really a no-lose situation as with a 7 man bullpen it is hard to see anyone who really is valuable being left in the minors.
Mike Green - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 12:08 PM EST (#211643) #
$2.75 million was quite a bit this off-season.  At the low end, Hinske went for $1 million, Glaus went for $2 million and O-Dog went for $5 million. 

Hinske would have been a nice utility player, covering the corner IF and OF spots, and Magpie's cries of DUUUUDE would have been a good counterpoint to a difficult year. 

John Northey - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 12:44 PM EST (#211644) #
Offensive backup players are dropping in price thanks to the old laws of supply and demand. Everyone uses 12 man pitching staffs these days afaik thus leaving just 13 position slots. 8-9 (depending on league) are used by regulars, 1 by a backup catcher. That leaves 3-4 slots per team for utility guys/platoon partners. Of those at least one has to be an infielder who can play shortstop (McDonald) and at least one has to be a competent outfielder ideally who could cover CF (Bautista or one of those outfielders signed this winter). That leaves 1-2 slots per team for guys like Hinske/Glaus/O-Dog as they cannot be expected to cover shortstop or CF beyond emergency situations (or managers doing odd things).

Pretty limited market really, as that means that Hinske & Glaus (and to a lesser degree O-Dog) were limited to fighting it out for a maximum of 48 jobs (24 NL, 14 AL) unless someone sees them as regulars (not platoon partners or backups). Given most teams like to save money on those slots (for good reason) you won't see many contacts given out that are significant.
Mike Green - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 01:18 PM EST (#211645) #
Seattle may be moving to an 11 man staff (after the signing of Garko for 500K).  I wonder if Tango has given some advice to Jack Z about the (pardon me) market efficiencies involved in signing an extra body for the bench rather than a 12th man for the staff.  If so, he can give the same advice to AA any time soon as far as I am concerned.  It is my professional opinion that it would not be a conflict of interest!
Richard S.S. - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 01:43 PM EST (#211646) #
The Bullpen is: 1) Out of Options (5): Kevin Gregg (RHP), Scott Downs (LHP), Jason Frasor (RHP), Brian Tallet (LHP) and Casey Janssen (RHP).   2) With 1 option (2): Shawn Camp (RHP) and Jeremy (play me or trade me) Accardo (RHP).   3) With 2 or more options (3+): Jesse Carlson (LHP), Josh Roenicke (RHP) and Dirk (may be ready for spring training) Hayhurst (RHP) - not to mention others.   Serious decisions must be made before Pitchers and Catchers report.
Chuck - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 02:12 PM EST (#211648) #

I don't see much point to the signing, but if he has a great start he becomes trade bait

I'm not a fan of acquiring someone whose main purpose is to serve as trade bait. What if Gregg goes crazy with 15 saves in April and May and an ERA around 1.00. Who will that fool? Who will suddenly decide he has morphed into Mariano Rivera?

I think fans overvalue their teams' potential trade chits (or chips, as some prefer). For every $2M signing who "can be moved at the deadline", how many really get moved at the deadline and for a decent exchange? How much of this trade bait talk is based on empirical evidence and how much is wishcasting? I won't pretend that I have studied the matter, but my instincts lie with the latter hypothesis.

Mike Green - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 02:27 PM EST (#211650) #
It's really hard to figure.  Ugueth Urbina was a closer signed in 2004 by the Tigers, had a poor 2004 and started off 2005 pretty well.  They moved him for Placido Polanco (who was blocking Utley).  That's about as good as it gets. 
Glevin - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 02:38 PM EST (#211651) #
"I'm not a fan of acquiring someone whose main purpose is to serve as trade bait. What if Gregg goes crazy with 15 saves in April and May and an ERA around 1.00. Who will that fool? Who will suddenly decide he has morphed into Mariano Rivera?"

Of course not, but George Sherrill netted the O's Josh Bell and Steve Johnson at the deadline last year. If Gregg is reasonably solid as a closer, he will be able to get a decent prospect back. I don't like this signing, but I don't hate it either like the McDonald signing.
John Northey - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 03:04 PM EST (#211652) #
Thanks for the option list Richard - don't know if there is a good online source that lists player ABC has Y options left.

So a core for the 2010 pen of...
Gregg/Frasor/Janssen RHP
Downs/Tallet LHP
Plus able to send down...
Camp/Accardo/Roenicke/Hayhurst RHP
Carlson/??? LHP

Janssen could just be released or sent down with a 'dare you to put him on your roster' bit thus cutting it down to a core 4. Also have to factor in the Rule 5 guy eating a slot and Cito seeming to like Camp thus putting Accardo/Roenicke/Hayhurst/Carlson fighting it out with Janssen or hoping for injuries. Not a bad situation really.

Of course, I thought Accardo and Camp were out of options as of this year which changes the math a bit, leaving the Jays to decide if they want to risk losing Accardo or Janssen for nothing.
Spifficus - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 03:16 PM EST (#211653) #
Janssen may actually have an option left - he wouldn't have used an option for 2007, and since he was injured in spring training they probably didn't option him before he got hurt in 2008. So, depending, that may only leave 2006 and 2009 as option years. Of course, even if he was at 3 already, they could apply for a 4th option year because of 2008. Mind you, it's an option I'd be less inclined to use than others, but it may be there.
Ryan Day - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 03:17 PM EST (#211654) #
It's possible that Gregg could bring back a solid return, but he's never hit the elite levels of Urbina or Sherrill (inconsistent as they may have been). Last year, coming off two pretty good closing seasons (for the Marlins, in the NL, for what that's worth), he netted Jose Ceda, a pretty good minor league reliever (great numbers, but carried a lot of weight and already had shoulder problems in 07) who then missed 2009 with shoulder surgery.

Anything's possible, but I have a hard time believing Gregg will be worth more in August than he was after 2008. Even if he is, is the possible acquisition of a decent minor leaguer who might be a contributor eventually the sort of thing Anthopoulos needs to pursue?

To put it another way, the Jays picked up Downs from the scrap pile and got a very good reliever for very little money. I'd rather the Jays find the next Scott Downs (or the next Jesse Carlson, or the next Brian Tallet, even) than spend money to see if Kevin Gregg can get back to being a solid reliever.

Gregg probably doesn't hurt the team, but he doesn't do a whole lot to help, either.
Ryan Day - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 04:15 PM EST (#211655) #
I guess I'll add the caveat that Gregg is a little less redundant if AA now proceeds to pull off an awesome deal for Frasor and/or Downs.
brent - Friday, February 05 2010 @ 05:00 PM EST (#211656) #

I still don't understand why everyone is so tied up in knots about this. It is only 2.75 million for some more insurance. Who really believes the team will come out of Spring Training with every player healthy? Last, this team needs all the turnover it can get to just get a new start.

BTW, who else thinks Wells is going to have a monster year now that the team isn't going to try and be competitive?

ComebyDeanChance - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 12:36 AM EST (#211658) #
I still don't understand why everyone is so tied up in knots about this

I suspect it's the absence of things to get truly excited about. It's not like Toronto doesn't need bullpen help, with a second tier bullpen that was 9/14 in bullpen era, 10/14 in bullpen baa, 7/14 in whip and 14/14 in saves. One commonly held misconception is that the Jays have a miserly bullpen when the truth is the team needs help in that area. Whether Gregg comes through at all is an open question, but it's not like there are tons of options. I suspect that AA doesn't share in the over-estimation of Accardo (2009 whip 1.62, ops vs. rights 1.028) who may well make a valuable contribution but tends to get over-hyped by some. Downs was ugly after the break and Frasor has yet to show he can stand up to a full season of closer duty.

I'm neither optimistic nor pessimistic about Gregg, but I don't agree with those getting their knickers in a knot about it.
Richard S.S. - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 05:28 AM EST (#211659) #

This might help John, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_transactions ; Wiki is a good help.   As is Cot's, http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2005/01/toronto-blue-jays_05.html .   Then you have to search out player's records.   I think there are better choices available?!

- OR -

I have people whom I trust with the accuracy of information they put forth (be it from Television, Newspapers, Radio or 'net).   Their reputations ride on the sincerity of the data.   Three people say same thing (looks, walks, talks like a duck) and I find supporting data, it must be true.   I would be pleasantly surprised to be wrong.

 

Alex Obal - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 07:31 AM EST (#211660) #
Serious question - is there a realistic chance that Gregg, if he miraculously puts up a 4.09 ERA, 1.58 K/BB and 33 saves to become type A, will [a] decline arbitration AND [b] actually get signed? If the answer is 'yes,' even though Gregg wasn't offered arb this winter, and if someone can convince me there's a chance Gregg actually survives the AL East, it might move me off the ledge a bit.

Gregg himself doesn't excite me, as most righty NL flyball pitchers with okay K/BB numbers on the wrong side of 27 don't. He's only 'insurance' in that he has leeway because he's established -- no matter how he pitches in April, he will occupy a high-leverage role in May by virtue of his contract and career save total. You couldn't say the same if the Jays had signed Winston Abreu instead and thrust Tallet or Camp into a late-inning role. Maybe there's something to be said for that sense of stability. In fact, it's heartening that AA is considering someone who clearly isn't his best reliever for the traditional closer's role. But given the choice, I'd rather throw away $2.75M on the prospect budget, or save it as flexibility to take on bad contracts (think Encarnacion). I'll feel the same way if Downs or Frasor gets dealt. When the alternative is one year of an unremarkable NL reliever, who isn't tangibly better than Brian Tallet, to bolster my bullpen in a rebuilding year? Please give me the upside. (Of course, if Gregg comes with a decent shot at a sandwich pick, that changes the math dramatically.)
Richard S.S. - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 08:52 AM EST (#211661) #
Gregg is better than: Downs - no; Frasor - no; Accardo - yes; Tallet (start or relieve?) - maybe; Janssen - yes; Roenicke - maybe; Carlson - no; Camp - maybe; Zinicola - yes; a healthy Dirk Hayhurst - yes.
greenfrog - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 09:26 AM EST (#211662) #
Rotographs has some more statistical info on Gregg:

http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/gregg-inks-with-blue-jays

Interestingly, the writer suggests that Gregg's 2009 was actually better than his 2007 and 2008 seasons (better K and BB rates, highest outside swing rate of his career, reasonable BABIP and stranded baserunner rates). However, with respect to HR allowed, he was apparently lucky in '07 and '08, but very unlucky in '09.

His conclusion? "Gregg figures to rebound somewhat next season, but intermittent control and fly ball proclivities make him an iffy high-leverage reliever."
Ryan Day - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 01:36 PM EST (#211663) #
I still don't understand why everyone is so tied up in knots about this.

1. I wouldn't say I'm tied up in knots. I'm still able to sleep and bathe myself.
2. It's February. It's either this or American Idol.
3. It's just a very bland move by Anthopoulos, and I think many people were optimistic about him finding new ways of doing things. Signing a closer who was never that great to begin with when you've already got a dozen different pitchers who could be effective relievers is so 2003. (I don't know if expecting AA to be different was ever that realistic, but still...)

Brent S - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 02:19 PM EST (#211664) #
Interesting tweet from ESPN's Jorge Arangure: The Jays, Rockies and Rangers are all interested in recently-defected Cuban 1B Jose Julio Ruiz.

Ruiz is 25 and would be blocked by Wallace and Lind at 1B and DH, respectively.

ayjackson - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 03:27 PM EST (#211665) #

Serious question - is there a realistic chance that Gregg, if he miraculously puts up a 4.09 ERA, 1.58 K/BB and 33 saves to become type A, will [a] decline arbitration AND [b] actually get signed? If the answer is 'yes,' even though Gregg wasn't offered arb this winter, and if someone can convince me there's a chance Gregg actually survives the AL East, it might move me off the ledge a bit.

He's sure to decline arb with those numbers - only 45 days of his salary is guaranteed.  Would you take a guarantee of about $300k or take your chance in free agency, though he wouldn't be signed by a team that stood to lose a first rounder.  Still that's over half the league who may be interested.

It's more likely though that he performs himself down into the Type B category.  Which would probably be optimal.

But I'd ask this:  if we made this signing and then traded Brandon League for Brandon Morrow, would you be happier?  AA said through a Bastian tweet that he should be thought of as League's replacement.

92-93 - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 03:27 PM EST (#211666) #
For me a move like this can't really be judged until the 2010 MLB draft - if the Jays spend liberally on their 8 or 9 early picks (damnit Omar, just sign Barajas already) and are frequent bidders on international talent than signings like Gregg or McDonald need not be scrutinized.
ayjackson - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 04:05 PM EST (#211667) #

well said 92-93

Flex - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 04:13 PM EST (#211669) #
According to MLBtraderumors the Blue Jays have acquired Dana Eveland.
Flex - Saturday, February 06 2010 @ 04:17 PM EST (#211670) #
It's on the Jays' site now too.

http://thurly.net//e38
Keeping Up With The Kevins | 69 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.