Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

The Fighting Jays moved into sole possession of top spot in the American League East with a 5-4 walkoff win against the Tigers at the Rogers Centre Tuesday night.  The magic number for the Mighty Jays to clinch the East is only 161 while the wild card magic number is a mere 160. 



Rod "B.A." Barajas delivered the game winning RBI with a sac fly in the bottom of the ninth off former Jay Brandon "Detroit" Lyon (hey, I'm allowed to make that crack as a Lions fan!) to plate pinch-runner Jose BautistaAaron Hill looked like he was going to be the hero after delivering a three-run homer off Lyon to rally the Jays from a 3-0 deficit in the eighth.  The Jays had been blanked over the first seven innings before Scott Rolen finally broke the goose egg with his first dinger of 2009.

David Purcey did his best to keep his team in the game by allowing just one run over six innings on a sac fly by Curtis Granderson.  However, Tigers starter Edwin Jackson was better as he retired 18 of 19 hitters at one point.  It looked like the game was going into the toilet for the home side when Purcey was burned for two runs in the seventh.  The second run came when Purcey tried to give an intentional pass to Brandon Inge but his pitch sailed to the backstop.  He wound up chucking the ball into center field in an attempt to get Marcus Thames, who had doubled in the first run of the inning.  That allowed Carlos Guillen to score to make it 3-0 Tigers.

 Still, Purcey had a decent outing by allowing just 8 baserunners (five hits, three walks) while getting eight groundouts and striking out five.  The lefty gave way to Shawn Camp in the eighth and Camp made things interesting by loading the bases after getting the first men out but he kept the Detroiters off the board.

When the Jays rallied in the eighth to pull ahead 4-3, it was up to B.J. Ryan to slam the door shut.  The Louisiana lefty struck out Thames for the first out but his next pitch was sent over the wall by Inge to tie the game at 4-4.  He stranded a Granderson single to send the game into the bottom of the ninth.  Ryan wound up with the blown save but picked up the win when Adam Lind drew a walk, Rolen singled pinch-runner Bautista to third, and an intentional walk to Lyle Overbay loaded the bases for Barajas and his winning sac fly.  The one positive from Ryan's night was his fastball was in the 87-89 range and touching 90 according to MLB Game Day.

Just less than 17,000 folks took in the alcohol-free game that lasted two hours and 40 minutes.  There were no delays so it looks like those in attendace behaved themselves for the most part.  As the late great Mel Allen would say, "How about that?"

Tonight, Jesse Litsch gets the ball against Zach Miner.  Litsch will throw the first pitch hopefully for a strike at 7:07 p.m. EDT at the R.C.  I'm glad I restrained myself for not rhyming something off like Litsch won't throw a pitch in the ditch because he'd look like Mark Fidrych, just sayin'!

=============

In other TDIB notes.........

*  The Red Sox beat the Rays 5-3 in their home opener as Josh Beckett did alright for himself.

*  NL Cy Young Award winner Tim Lincecum was bad but Jeff Suppan was worse as the Giants outslugged the Brewers 10-6 in their home opener.

Jim Thome and the White Sox powered their way to a 4-2 win over the Royals in the curtain raiser at U.S. Cellular Field.

*  The Twins rallied in the ninth for a 6-5 win as the Mariners pissed one away at the Metrodome.

*  The Braves are 2-0 and the Phillies are 0-2 after Atlanta's 4-0 whitewashing at Citizens Bank Park.

*  The Marlins are also off to a 2-0 start with a second straight win over the Nationals.

*  The Padres, Rockies, Cardinals, Astros, and A's pick up their first wins of 2009.

*  D-Backs ace Brandon Webb is not too worried about his stiff right wing.

*  Halos hurler and former Jay Kelvim Escobar's tired wing has led to his minor league rehab start being pushed back for a few days.

*  Today's probable starters.

A-Team Effort: B.A. Barajas Saves Private Ryan! | 40 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
scottt - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 06:39 AM EDT (#198025) #
Jackson pitched a hell of a game. His fastball was topping at 96-97 mph on some strike outs.

Ryan looked bad, but not really worse than last year.

I was surprised to see Purcey allowed to throw 100 of them. That Tiger lineup isn't particularly lefty friendly.

C Snoy - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 08:56 AM EDT (#198026) #
I cant believe that sportsnet would rather show the Leafs battle for 12th in the division than the Jays game. Even the Fan590 aired the Raps game over the jays... whats a guy gotta do to be a jays fan around here...

Nonetheless, great game! Glad to see the Jays fightin right to the end. Sounded like Purcey pitched alright aside from that little slip up on the intentional walk. That's not something you see everyday(thankfully).
Pistol - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 09:05 AM EDT (#198027) #
It ultimately worked out, but I thought last night when Barajas came up it was a good example of a time when the Jays could have used a LH bat on the bench.

And was I the only one hoping for Barajas to strike out to make sure he didn't hit into a double play and Snider would get a shot?
TimberLee - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 09:31 AM EDT (#198028) #
For days (like yesterday) when the Canadian networks are showing poker tournaments and the like, there is MLB Extra Innings for about $1/day available from your cable company. It's also good for having a back-up game to watch between innings. You can save up the fee by going alcohol-free during the game, just like Rogers Centre!
timpinder - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 09:58 AM EDT (#198029) #

Pistol,

I wrote the same thing under another thread and I definitely agree with you.  I was convinced that Barajas was going to roll over one to the left side (they were pitching him low and inside) and into a double play.  Millar, McDonald and Barrett, all righties, were on the bench.  Free Joe Inglett.

Mike Green - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 10:10 AM EDT (#198030) #
Rolen is obviously healthy.   When healthy, he's still a great player. 

I agree that Inglett would be more valuable than Millar on the bench.  But, if he is still in triple A in June, that will mean that Rolen and Hill are both in good shape.  Which would be very good news indeed.

Mike Green - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 10:18 AM EDT (#198031) #
Incidentally, these daily reports are fun, #2JB.  "Litsch's pitches" sounds like a successor to Schilling's blog when Jesse gets around to it in 2015 or something.
C Snoy - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 10:20 AM EDT (#198032) #
I actually said out loud to the guy beside me that if Barajas was going to let us down... it better be via the strikeout. I was feelin good vibes about Snider, I'm sure he would have stepped up.

I was wondering the other day what Millar was going to do for the team this year. I'm not really sure he is worth keeping around. Of course, I'll take that back if a significant injury to Overbay pops up.
C Snoy - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 10:27 AM EDT (#198033) #
Well.. I might retract that statement. I'll say instead that I am on the fence. Seems he has a great attitude and brings experience that could be beneficial for the younger players. But do they need his help with the Gaston's Guidance in place?
Mick in Ithaca - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 10:50 AM EDT (#198034) #
There's been a lot of this "too bad Inglett wasn't on the bench last night" stuff. Had he been, and been brought in to pinch hit for Barajas, we'd've seen Nate Robertson, who looked pretty good against Overbay and Snider Monday night. Of course, then Millar could've pinch hit for Inglett . . . oh, wait . . . he wouldn't be on the team! Guess it'd have to be Johnny Mac instead.

Personally, I was hoping for Barajas to succeed. Had he struck out or popped up, Snider would've had to face Robertson, who struck him out on 3 pitches Monday. That's a lot of pressure for a young guy, no matter how good he is. Maybe he'd've wound up the hero though . . . that would've been great.

But Barajas' fly ball was great anyway. He took a tough pitch (inside part of the plate) and got the job done. Last year, after a pitching performance like Jackson's, the Jays wouldn't have been in position for bottom of the ninth heroics; the game would've probably ended 3-0.

Richard S.S. - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 11:24 AM EDT (#198037) #
Purcey did very well, all things considered.  Did anyone notice our starters seemingly hitting a bump in the 7th inning of their games.  Should we be concerned?  Should we be concerned at this time?  Is E. Jackson this good or is our offence that bad (our offense is not that bad)?  Litsch's opponent http://detroit.tigers.mlb.com/stats/individual_stats_player.jsp?playerID=435261&statType=2 has comparable stats http://toronto.bluejays.mlb.com/stats/individual_stats_player.jsp?playerID=446209&statType=2, but I believe Advantage Litsch.  Is it time to go for the throat?
Mylegacy - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 12:03 PM EDT (#198038) #

Couple of observations from the RO.. I was there and...

Jackson was throwing smoke...until about half way through the 6th when he clearly started to tire - however early we hit some very hard long outs against him. Purcey threw - I don't know how many strikes the ump called balls - I was sitting behind homeplate in section 121, Row 26 seat 11 (as I will today and tomorrow) and as they say - the ump was blind. In addition Camp got robbed on some calls too. Forget Scoots and Hill because from Rios through Wells, Lind, Rolen, Overbay, Barajas and Snider we've got a bottom seven of the order that is truly a KILLERS ROW. 

ALSO - I called the win! When we got two on in the ninth and Detroit went to walk Overbay I told the guy sitting next to me that Leland was making a BIG mistate. I said that Overbay had never seen a double play he didn't like and Barajas never saw a warning track he didn't like hitting high flies to. It unfolded as I called it. After watching baseball for what seems like a zillion years - it's nice toget one right!

ALSO - for some reason they no longer have Montreal Corned Beef sandwiches only Montreal Smoked Meat. I come 3,000 lousy miles for a good Corned Beef sandwich and I get that other sh*it. AND - no beer. Oh well at least I had opening night, fights in the stands, balls on the field and so far - two wins - priceless.

Is it April yet? Yep.

C Snoy - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 12:04 PM EDT (#198039) #
The game wasnt televised so I cant say for sure. I don't think it is fair to judge jackson based on the MLB Gameday pitcher animations haha.

I would agree that the advantage goes to Litsch tonight. I'm pumped. I don't think it will be a blowout either way.. 2 or 3 runs. I suppose we will soon find out.
Jdog - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 12:24 PM EDT (#198040) #
"I don't know how many strikes the ump called balls - I was sitting behind homeplate in section 121, Row 26 seat 11 (as I will today and tomorrow) and as they say - the ump was blind. In addition Camp got robbed on some calls too."

Amen to that MyLegacy. I was watching the game on MLB.TV and even the detroit guys were talking about how the ump was being fairly generous to Jackson on the outside of the plate. Purcey threw several(at least 3) pitches right down the middle or slighlty on the inside part of the plate. He should have had another 2-3 strikeouts. And the Detroit announcers even talked about the Ump blowing a strikeout of Camp's. Camps pitches were moving all over the place, he didn't deserve the trouble he got into.
Ryan Day - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 12:28 PM EDT (#198041) #
Did anyone notice our starters seemingly hitting a bump in the 7th inning of their games.  Should we be concerned?  Should we be concerned at this time?

It's April, so I'm going to say "no".
Chuck - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 12:43 PM EDT (#198042) #

Seems he has a great attitude and brings experience that could be beneficial for the younger players.

The final line on a crummy player's CV.

Pistol - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 01:20 PM EDT (#198044) #
Incidentally, these daily reports are fun, #2JB

Seconded.  I hope they continue.
C Snoy - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 01:24 PM EDT (#198045) #
Haha, Fair enough Chuck. Like I said, I'm not sure he should be kept around. What do you think is the best course of action?
vw_fan17 - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 02:28 PM EDT (#198046) #
I cant believe that sportsnet would rather show the Leafs battle for 12th in the division than the Jays game. Even the Fan590 aired the Raps game over the jays... whats a guy gotta do to be a jays fan around here...

(I'm NOT trying to change the discussion to hockey, just trying to point out a few things I think might be applicable.)
I know, it sure seems like it. But, to be fair, the Leafs' season is almost over (i.e. get your last couple of hockey game fixes before the summer), and the Jays are just starting a season with twice as many games. Case in point: in October '92, it seemed like almost NO ONE in Toronto noticed that the Leafs got off to like a 10-0-1 start or something due to a certain Toronto baseball team winning a few important series and having ALL the headlines.. So, if the Jays are still playing in October, expect them to preempt Leaf games with abandon to show Jays games.

From the financial side of things: there was at least a decent shot back in August or whenever the network bought the rights to the game that the Leafs MIGHT be fighting for a playoff spot at this point (they were only eliminated last week, so it's not a huge leap to think with a few breaks they might have still been fighting for spot #8 last night). If that was the case, the game would probably have been a ratings blockbuster (witness how many watched the Leafs/Habs season ending game 2 years ago, IIRC - highest ratings OF THE SEASON!). So - punt on a game that will probably at least make a few $$ to show a Jays game that only a dedicated core of fans really cares about - especially early in the season? Not a very good idea financially, IMHO.

Witness the fair-weather baseball fans: if the Jays are within striking distance of the playoffs in June/July, expect an attendance spike. Until then, most people won't take much notice of them...
John Northey - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 02:29 PM EDT (#198047) #
Well, the nice thing about modern technology is we can check what the ump called (or did not call).

David Purcey and the rest of the Jay pitchers had 3 strikes called balls and 5 balls called strikes. Only twice did a batter swing at a pitch outside the strikezone. His fastball peaked at 94.3 mph while averaging 91.92 mph. 81 fastballs, 13 sliders, 6 curveballs thrown.

Edwin Jackson and Detroit's pitchers had 2 balls called strikes and 0 strikes called balls.

Interesting eh?
Alex Obal - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 02:31 PM EDT (#198048) #
Incidentally, these daily reports are fun, #2JB

Seconded.  I hope they continue.

Thirded!
C Snoy - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 02:32 PM EDT (#198049) #
Nice John. Were these stats already put together somewhere or did you do some analysis of raw data? Where did it come from?
Timbuck2 - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 02:41 PM EDT (#198050) #
Just as a note to Rogers Cable Custoumers who have Digtal Boxes - They show the opposing teams broadcast feed on channel 399 when the game isn't being carried by CBC, TSN or Sportsnet.
robertdudek - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 02:47 PM EDT (#198051) #
Only one comment about last nights game ...

I love it when a plan comes together!

Jdog - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 03:04 PM EDT (#198052) #
Thanks John.

So I guess I remembered all 3 pitches, 3 strikes called balls doesn't sound like much, but a couple of them were 3rd strikes and they were obvious.
#2JBrumfield - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 04:51 PM EDT (#198054) #

I love it when a plan comes together!

I forgot to work that line in.  As an avid A-Team fan, I'm ashamed!   John "Hannibal" Smith rules!  Loved that line, especially when he had a stogie in his mouth.

Thanks for the compliments Mike Green (you're having a helluva season with the Caps by the way!), Pistol and Alex!

John Northey - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 05:04 PM EDT (#198055) #
The pitch stats were from Brooks Baseball . Net's pitch fx section - http://brooksbaseball.net/pfx/index.php a site I love to go to.  The link on David Purcey leads to the game summary, while this link leads to his game stats.

Quite the site eh? 
C Snoy - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 05:50 PM EDT (#198056) #
Phenomenal site.. except for that goofy lookin logo. Thanks for the link.
Magpie - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 07:04 PM EDT (#198058) #
Greetings from the ballpark. My season opener. Let's celebrate with a Top 10 List.

1. Walter Alston
2. Tommy Lasorda
3. Earl Weaver
4. Tom Kelly
5. Danny Murtaugh
6. Red Schoendienst
7. Bill Terry
8. Mike Scioscia
9. Cito Gaston
10. Ron Gardenhire


Mick Doherty - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 07:24 PM EDT (#198061) #
Okay, kidz! It's time to play Mr. Magpie's Phenomenal new Game-o-Fun, GUESS THE TOPIC OF THE TOP TEN LIST!

Seriously, Mags, I am baffled. All MLB mangers, clearly,. I thought for a moment all had won a title, but Gardenhire has a miserable post-season record (6-15). All great managers who were lousy players? Alston at #1 suggested that but Schoendienst and Scioscia were All-Stars, Gaston had some nice years and oh by the way, Bill Terry was a Hall of Famer.

So what's the common link? First person to answer correctly -- other than Mags, of course --wins a coveted BB No-Prize. If nobody answers correctly, the BBNP goes to the cleverest, funniest answer. The "rightness" of the answer is to be adjudged my Mr. Magpie. The clevenessish of the answer is to be adjudged by myownself (so there).

What's the list? (Now watch, while I've been typing this, he's already posted it ...)

christaylor - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 08:52 PM EDT (#198062) #
T'was the night after opening day
and my girlfriend scored the play.
An oafish lout was beside her.
Until Rolen hit a homer
against E-Jack-off,
I nearly did cry with a cough
"Critics are right!
No balls can this offense smite!"

But before long,
the fast-ball was gone
and I was happy as clam
hoping for a Barajas slam.

But, a sac fly was fine
then she jotted down the game time (and attendance).
Then I walked the lovely Julia,
way past her school (yeah!)
and past a fence,
discussing the jays defense
To where I would lay my head
in her comfy bed.
To dream of 162 and oh,
and MLB '09 the show.

For now the season has begun
and it is time for some fun!
For these are Tigers,
and not lowly Ligers
for we will see,
in this year of mystery,
more than a win or two,
on this I bet my left shoe.

OK, enough of that, I am a scientist... not a poet (as if you couldn't tell).
christaylor - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 08:54 PM EDT (#198063) #
Yes! Daily reports, I loves them.
ANationalAcrobat - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 09:37 PM EDT (#198064) #
Wilner just mentioned that there will be no more Wednesdays With JP on the Fan. JP isn't interested anymore.
westcoast dude - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 10:08 PM EDT (#198065) #
Blue Jays Nation  turns its eyes on Ricky Romero to keep the Losses from turning into a crooked number in tomorrow's matinee getaway.  It will be an uphill battle, with untold numbers of  chattering youth in attendance.  Blue Jays rarely win this kind of game. You have taken on a monumental challenge, Mr. Romero, Sir!    Mission Impossible: Stop the Bleeding.
Mike Green - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 10:48 PM EDT (#198067) #
Baltimore's 2nd victory over the Yankees is interesting.  The thought that they might be at .500 by the time Wieters arrives is a little less unlikely.  Last year, I figured that the Rays had a good club, but were likely to get off to a slow start absent Longoria and Kazmir.  It didn't happen. 

The O's are clearly not as good as the Rays were last year, but they are definitely on the right track.

Magpie - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 11:45 PM EDT (#198070) #
All MLB mangers, clearly

Most wins by managers who racked up their totals with a single team. Connie Mack (Pittsburgh Pirates) and John McGraw (Baltimore Orioles) obviously don't qualify. You could persuade me to include Fred Clarke (Louisville kinda/sort of merged with Pittsburgh.)
brent - Wednesday, April 08 2009 @ 11:51 PM EDT (#198071) #
The Jay's offense hasn't passed its first two challenges. We'll see what they can do against a lefty in Cleveland. I think the hitting coaches are going to have to make sure the hitters put in their work as Cito has said.
christaylor - Thursday, April 09 2009 @ 10:01 AM EDT (#198083) #
Brent, you're either full of it or have a bizarre pass/fail criteria that I am not aware. In the opener, the offense kicked the snot out of one of the better righties in the AL. The offense then mounted a come back against a starting pitcher who was lights out until Rolen took him yard. Yes, the offense took the night off on Wednesday... but what's not to like when the team is winning 2/3rd of its games.

Not sure when it became trendy to wee-wee all over one's home-town nine but to make such a comment at this stage of the season makes me think a) you've got a soft-spot on your head that hasn't fused or b) you're not watching the games.

Watch the 2009 Jays play, you're missing quite a good team that ought to only get better from here on out. Today's match-up is tasty, Romero versus Procello; I wouldn't be surprised if the 24 year old "washed-up prospect" out pitches the Boras hype baby (not that I dislike Porcello's pitching, quite the opposite).
92-93 - Thursday, April 09 2009 @ 12:26 PM EDT (#198097) #
Brent was referencing the fact that last year the Jays had a distinct ability to suck against bad pitchers. He figured the real test of this year's offense would come against Jackson and Miner, as opposed to Verlander, because the Jays have hit the better pitchers well the last few years.
christaylor - Thursday, April 09 2009 @ 06:24 PM EDT (#198114) #
I don't think it possible that "being bad against bad pitchers" is an ability. The Jays offense, like any average offense will have good days and bad days. I doubt one would find a significant negative correlation between the opposing pitchers ERA and the Jays runs scored against... what I am trying to say here is that the whole idea that "the Jays are bad against bad pitching" is non-sensical.

3/4... what's not to like? I'm not counting any meaningful September games before they have hatched but this 2009 is easily my favorite team to watch in quite some time (at least since the Delgado era).
A-Team Effort: B.A. Barajas Saves Private Ryan! | 40 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.