Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
TSN is reporting that the Blue Jays have released DH Frank Thomas.


Ten days ago, this would have been... surprising. Today, not so much.  A tip of the cap to Bauxite ramone who spotted the story.

So. Any thoughts?
Blue Jays Release Frank Thomas | 109 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
ayjackson - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:19 AM EDT (#183038) #
I'm not surprised.  Let's just move forward.  I'm sure there'll be a backlash for the "way we treated a hall-of-famer".
ANationalAcrobat - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:23 AM EDT (#183039) #
This speaks to how poorly constructed the contract is. I assume the thinking at the time was, "if Frank is healthy, he'll be worth the third year." However, assuming that a 39, 40, and 41 year old Frank Thomas would be a good enough hitter to be holding the DH spot for the Jays was obviously a mistake. The plate appearances threshold undoubtedly contributed to some degree to the Jays' decision to bench the Big Hurt, meaning it was partly a contract decision. Even if the move to the bench was entirely a baseball decision, the PA threshold led to some ill will, and led Frank to blast the Jays in the media. I blame the contract.

Bring on Bonds? I don't like the idea of counting on a 40 year old Matt Stairs at DH. I wouldn't mind Glaus at DH. Oh, wait...

Rickster - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:26 AM EDT (#183040) #

Sorry to see him go, but this is absolutely the right move. He's done. He can't catch up to average fastballs any more. He looked terrible in Spring Training, hitting 160/176/260 and had two big hits against Manny Delcarmen so far this season, which got him to 167/303/360. He's not off to a slow start - his career is over. The Jays gave him 110 ABs in ST and the regular season and came to the conclusion that he simply doesn't have it any more.

It's also clear that he was already becoming a pouty whiner. Too bad it couldn't work out, but if he was being paid big bucks to hit the ball, and he couldn't do that. For this team to make the playoffs, everything has to go right. They can't afford to wait until June to realize that Thomas was done. Bring on the Adam Lind era - he might not ever be a regular major leaguer, but the Jays at least have a chance with him. Say what you will, but this team is not being complacent.

GrrBear - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:28 AM EDT (#183041) #
FREE ADAM LIND!

Oh wait...

I'm a fan of the Big Hurt, but it's obvious that he can't catch up to outside pitches, and perhaps he's been refusing to make suggested adjustments.  And if Lind seems ready to go, why wait, especially when the team is having a hard time scoring runs.

Add me to the list of people who would like to see the Jays sign Bonds to replace Thomas, though.  Just for the look of outrage on certain local columnists' faces, really...

CeeBee - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:30 AM EDT (#183042) #
Nothing against Thomas but for a guy who's slow as molasses, can't field a position and is 40 I think Lind or even Adams would give Gibby a lot more options. Too bad it ended this way but if Frank had just kept his mouth shut for a few days and waited to see if he got another chance maybe this all could have been avoided, though in the big scheme of things it's probably a good thing to have happened now rather than in 2 months all things being roughly the same.
Magpie - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:30 AM EDT (#183043) #
I have no problem with this. It's not my money, and as I said elsewhere, I'd rather have just one 40 year old DH on my short bench. And I'd rather have the other guy.

I've seen some speculation that Thomas can no longer get around on the fastball, and I've read that the Jays were alarmed by some of the experimentation Thomas had been doing at the plate this year. I dunno - two weeks ago, I saw him turn on a 96 mph fastball and put it in the left field seats. When an older player can no longer get around on the hard one, you often see his walk totals shoot up, and he starts to work the count more, looking for something he can still handle (think Willie Mays in 1971). Haven't seen that with Thomas yet.

But it's over now. It was a bit messy, but these things are almost never nice.

Pistol - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:35 AM EDT (#183045) #

I'm a little surprised it came this quick, but it's probably the best for everybody.  If you have a player that offers nothing but his bat and his bat isn't particularly impressive it's a waste of a roster spot, particularly when you have to pinch run for him late in the game.

Blair noted in spring training that his bat speed seemed especially slow, which I'm sure is in some part was Jays officials saying the same thing.  I wonder if there's any way that teams measure bat speed.

The good thing with this, assuming Lind is recalled, is that now Stairs and Lind can both play at the same time with the DH spot opened up which balances the lineup a little more.

Effectively this ended up being a one year, $18 million deal.  Sure, it's just money (and not mine!) but you'd wish that it was better spent in the first place.

AWeb - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:44 AM EDT (#183046) #
Wow, that came QUICKLY... the Jays aren't screwing around this year, and although I'm not convinced they are making the right moves they are being direct with them. I ripped Thomas in the other thread, but also mentioned I thought it was early to give up. I don't think this happens so quickly (or maybe at all) if Thomas didn't go into a sulk so quickly and totally - GMs and coaches can't like it when a struggling player starts hurting them in the media, especially a veteran.

So it sounds like Lind is on his way - no pressure kid, but the last guy got cut for 3 bad weeks of hitting - one assumes the Jays will have more patience with the Lind, but the gauntlet has been thrown down for all the players to see.

Getting nothing for Thomas really grates though. If he had managed a good start, and Lind continued to hit in AAA, they could have at least shifted Thomas for some minor league filler, probably. Why do I think Thomas is going to catch on in Oakland again?
jbrains - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:44 AM EDT (#183047) #
It's a shame that this situation couldn't have worked out better for both sides.

I'm annoyed by Frank, who decided to act like a big (!) baby instead of facing up to his own lack of production and putting the team ahead of himself. If this is the way he intends to act, then he doesn't fit on a winning team. For that reason, he can go.

Forgetting the 2009 option business for a moment, the Blue Jays simply can't afford to carry someone who performs well below replacement level for 6-8 weeks at the beginning of every season, especially when we already have no idea when Overbay will start hitting again. I don't know many contending teams who can afford to let someone perform around .300/.300 for two months in order to (possibly) get .400/.550 the rest of the way.

I don't think Frank is done quite yet. He'll catch on somewhere, I imagine, as soon as the market bashes it into his head that he's no longer worth it at $9M/year to be an everyday DH. Even so, it doesn't matter. Even if Frank hits 30 HR in four months for another team, this is a good move, because Frank is just too risky to carry any more.

Shame. I think Frank has missed his last shot at a ring.
westcoast dude - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:51 AM EDT (#183050) #

The size of the contract only matters to us mere mortals. How fortunate  Matt Stairs or even a Stairs/Lind/Barajas combo can handle DH. There's no reason it can't provide a .300 BA spot and good slugging.

Hats off to Gibbons and JP. Gibbons' press conference yesterday was an understated masterpiece.

Chuck - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:52 AM EDT (#183051) #

It was a bit messy, but these things are almost never nice.

Agreed.  A Stairs/Thomas DH platoon was never going to happen since this would have resulted in Thomas' option not vesting and would have allowed Thomas to hang around and be given a forum to kvetch. He'll now have to do his kvetching from afar, which will be far less disruptive.

From too many bodies for too few rules, the team now has some potential challenges at the other extreme. Is Stairs healthy enough to man the busy half of a DH platoon? And if he's not, who steps in? And who assumes the other half of the platoon? Stewart? It sure looks like LF is up for grabs now. How about a Lind/Johnson platoon? No wait, Johnson is now the Cubs' starting center fielder.

It's premature to panic, but a little voice in the back of my head is screaming BERG! BERG! BERG! and is cautioning me to the threat of seeing a whole more of Scutario and Inglett in LF than is reasonably tolerated.

Original Ryan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:00 PM EDT (#183052) #
It's disappointing Frank's tenure as a Blue Jay had to end this way.  He was always one of my favourite non-Jays when he was with the White Sox.  I wanted the Blue Jays to take a chance on him in 2006, but unfortunately they wound up signing him a year too late for too much money.
Chuck - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:01 PM EDT (#183053) #

Why do I think Thomas is going to catch on in Oakland again?

Presuming that his vesting option still holds, I think the only way Thomas catches on with anyone is if he is prepared to not see enough playing time to trigger the option. What team would be foolish enough to give more than the 300-odd more PAs that he needs?

As for Oakland, they are already carrying Sweeney and Cust. While Sweeney could well be toast (he sure looked that way in KC) and while Cust is doing precious little to prove that the league hasn't figured him out, I still have a hard time seeing them making room for Thomas, even for the $300K he'd cost. Frankly, I don't know that it's a given that Thomas ends up anywhere. Maybe the Twins? Maybe? The chirping Thomas is doing (and presumably will continue to do) won't help his cause.

Thomas - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:08 PM EDT (#183054) #
Why would the option still hold? If he signs with someone else it's a new contract. It's not the same contract he signed with the Jays - he's been released from that - and the option vanished with that contract. I could be wrong on that, but that's just logical.

I agree with the common sentiment. It was probably the right move, but this whole thing has been handled poorly from the front office, from the original contract through to this benching. Why bench Thomas if he's all but going to be released anyway? Anyhow, it's not my money, but a one-year $18 million contract is not going to go down as a particularly wise investment. However, given the way things stand now, it's probably for the best.
Chuck - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:12 PM EDT (#183055) #
Why would the option still hold?

I don't pretend to know for sure (Magpie, do you?) but I would assume that Thomas' contract is still in effect. He has been released from the organization, not from his contract. The terms of the contract have not been terminated. The Jays owe him the balance of the guaranteed money and, I would assume, any other stipulations in that contract, i.e., the vesting option.
Magpie - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:13 PM EDT (#183056) #
Griffin earlier today was speculating that this very thing might happen once Rolen returns. But that's not what caught my eye. It was his passing mention that Thomas wants to hang around long enough to hit 600 homers. Which is at least three years away.

Someone will be happy to snap him up - they'll only have to pay the minimum, the Jays are on the hook for the rest of this year's salary - but only once they can be sure they won't have to give him the 300 plate appearances. Right now, that option is radioactive. No one's going to even want to get near it.

The timing makes me crazy. Why? Because I've got a brand new 4000 word piece that no one's even going to notice now! Curse you, Ricciardi!

Gerry - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:27 PM EDT (#183057) #

I think now, in retrospect, the Thomas contract was a mistake.  (I also thought it was a mistake when the Jays signed him).  It has cost the Jays almost $20 million for a year and a few weeks of play. 

What are the chances we will be in the same place this time next year with Matt Stairs?  Giving multi-year contracts to players in their high 30's, particularly now that the drug clampdown is underway, is very high risk for a team.

Rob - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:32 PM EDT (#183059) #
I know how things get around here, and before anyone starts jumping out of a window, crying "$18 million for one year!" over and over, we should remember the following:

The Tigers owe Gary Sheffield $14 million in 2008, 14 in 2009. The White Sox (and Phillies) owe Jim Thome $14 million this year, 13 next. They can buy him out for $3m, and if they do, it's effectively $17M for 2008. Jason Giambi gets $21M this year. Five more to get rid of him for 2009. Todd Helton is owed $16.6 million each of the next three years. Over 23 million dollars (!) for 2011, including an almost-certain buyout. If not, $23M in 2012.

None of these players aside from Helton currently hit above the Huckaby Line. Helton's also the youngest at 35 in August. Compared to these contracts, Thomas doesn't look so bad.
Magpie - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:33 PM EDT (#183060) #
The two years is guaranteed - if Thomas signs with Seattle, say, he gets the rest of his 2008 salary. The Mariners would pay him the minimum (pro-rated), the Blue Jays will make up the rest.

The rest is clear as mud. The status of the vesting option is tricky. I certainly have the impression that the Jays won't be on the hook for it even if he gets his plate appearances elsewhere. Maybe it says somewhere that the 1000 plate appearances have to be with the Jays. I have no idea. If no one clarifies this in the course of the day, I'll be at the park tomorrow and I'll try to find out.

Raptors Time!

chips - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:37 PM EDT (#183061) #
I hate contracts that pay you for what you DID versus what you will do. I know it's a crapshoot.
jeff mcl - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:48 PM EDT (#183062) #
Listening the Fan pregame now.  Gibby says Lind isn't going to get the call in the short term b/c he's still got a sore neck and won't be able to play for a few more days. Robinzon Diaz is probably called up for tomorrow's game.

And the Rays apparently have interest the Big H...

Thomas - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:51 PM EDT (#183063) #
The rest is clear as mud.

I don't pretend to know either, but the fact that the option would be void if Thomas is released from his current contract is logical. If it can vest even if Thomas reaches those plate appearances with another team than that is a major oversight on the front office's part. Those are exactly the sorts of things that whoever is responsible for contract language in the front office has to be aware of, particularly when giving contracts to 38-year-old DHs.

China fan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 12:58 PM EDT (#183064) #
    Today's lineup has Barajas at DH and batting 5th.   If Diaz is called up tomorrow, does that mean the Jays are going with only 24 players today?  If so, it really suggests that the Thomas release was not pre-planned but was a result of some emotional blow-up within the past 24 hours.  The Jays might have been planning to release him eventually, but why release him without anyone available to take his spot on the roster, leaving the team short-handed for a game?
scottt - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:00 PM EDT (#183065) #
How fortunate  Matt Stairs or even a Stairs/Lind/Barajas combo can handle DH.

I like Barajas, but Zaun would actually be the DH and that's pretty weak. Still need a right power bat on the bench. Stewart wasn't such a good pick after all.



Pistol - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:03 PM EDT (#183066) #
I would think the only way Thomas' contract holds up is if a team claims the contract (no chance).  And in that case the team picking him up would have to pay the vesting option.

From ESPN.com:

Blue Jays general manager J.P. Ricciardi told ESPN's Peter Gammons that the release of Thomas was "by mutual consent. He doesn't want to be here if he's not going to play much, and we don't want him to be unhappy. He handled it with class, and I appreciate that."

"Our best opportunity is to put other guys in the lineup at this point," Ricciardi said, according to The Associated Press. "Obviously, reduced playing time is not something that he was interested in. In order to let him go forward and get on with his career, I think it's fair to do it at this point."

"I don't know that we have the luxury of waiting two to three months for somebody to kick in because we can't let this league or this division get away from us," Ricciardi said, according to the AP.

ramone - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:05 PM EDT (#183067) #

In other news Rolen is starting at DH for Dunedin today.

China fan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:09 PM EDT (#183068) #
   By the way, the lineup today features a LF who's batting .188 (Scutaro), and a 3B who's batting .091 (McDonald).   It also features a DH who has only 3 RBIs, along with a 1B who has a .328 slugging average.  This is a lineup that still needs a lot of improvement.   Frank Thomas might have been part of the problem, but the team still desperately needs a strong performance from Overbay and Lind, and it needs Rolen to bounce back from injury without too many lingering effects, and it needs Stairs and Stewart to avoid any further age-related deterioration.  A lot of things have to go right.
China fan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:19 PM EDT (#183069) #
   I notice now that Diaz was not in the lineup for Syracuse yesterday.  So maybe the Jays managed to get him up to Toronto in time for today's game?   With Barajas at DH today, they need a catcher on the bench anyway.
grjas - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:29 PM EDT (#183071) #
"If so, it really suggests that the Thomas release was not pre-planned but was a result of some emotional blow-up within the past 24 hours."

Yeah but I wonder why Gibbons told Thomas he is on the bench indefinitely; why not position it as "day to day" and see how other options develop.

So was this Gibbons being honest and forthright with a player, or lighting his fuse for the inevitable blowup.. and additional justification for the planned release. I guess we'll never know.
Mike Green - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:42 PM EDT (#183072) #
The timing is obviously not ideal, but giving Stairs most of the DH at-bats and platooning Lind and Stewart in left-field once they are both healthy is fine.  Rod Barajas as the right-handed side of a DH platoon is not great though.

There is a roster construction problem coming.  Having both McDonald and Scutaro on the bench behind Rolen and Eckstein does not make sense, particularly if you are going to run platoons in LF and DH.  Inglett is probably more valuable to the club than Scutaro because he bats left and can play second and third, but it may be more important to have an extra decent right-handed bat.

Gerry - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:42 PM EDT (#183073) #
Gibbons made an interesting point in the pre-game show today.  To paraphrase he said he decided to bench Thomas because he is feeling the pressure to win and if the Jays don't win he (Gibbons) could be fired.  
ramone - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:49 PM EDT (#183074) #
China Fan: I notice in the syracuse box score today that Diaz is playing, so perhaps he'll be here tommorrow depending on how Lind feels.
Chuck - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 01:52 PM EDT (#183075) #

if Thomas is released from his current contract

Thomas, I'm going to continue to quibble over your semantics. Thomas was not released from his contract. The Jays are not in a position to unilaterally make that happen. The contract has not become null and void. It is still very much in effect. The Jays are on the hook for Thomas' 2008 salary. The only question is what becomes of the vesting option should another team pick up Thomas (contributing the prorated portion of the league's minimum salary to the money owed to Thomas).

Perhaps there is wording suggesting that the vesting only occurs if the required PAs are accumulated with the Jays (your assumption, if I read you correctly). Perhaps the wording is such that any team taking on the contract (even though they'd just be paying roughly $300K of the $10M owed in 2008) is the team that must honour the vesting option (my assumption). Perhaps, but almost totally unlikely (what would be the point of employing lawyers if this slipped through?), is that the Jays themselves would be on the hook for the money in 2009 should the vesting option be reached, even with another team.

Pistol - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 02:09 PM EDT (#183076) #
For what its worth, Jamie Campbell said the Jays aren't on the hook for the vesting option now.
China fan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 02:20 PM EDT (#183078) #
    One more footnote to the Frank Thomas story:  Jeff Blair deserves some credit for calling this one accurately.  Very early in the season, he described Thomas as an "abscess" in the lineup.  Since a few of us demanded that Blair should "eat crow" after Thomas had a couple of good games against Boston, it's only fair now to admit that Blair doesn't have to eat crow and actually was rather prescient on this one. 
    To be fair, Blair also described Eckstein as an abscess too, and the jury's still out on that one.  Eckstein has a respectable OBP of more than .360 so far this season, which is maybe all you need from a lead-off hitter.  But his OPS is a miserable .687, which is below even his career average. 
Thomas - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 02:38 PM EDT (#183079) #
Thomas, I'm going to continue to quibble over your semantics....Perhaps there is wording suggesting that the vesting only occurs if the required PAs are accumulated with the Jays (your assumption, if I read you correctly). Perhaps the wording is such that any team taking on the contract (even though they'd just be paying roughly $300K of the $10M owed in 2008) is the team that must honour the vesting option (my assumption). Perhaps, but almost totally unlikely (what would be the point of employing lawyers if this slipped through?), is that the Jays themselves would be on the hook for the money in 2009 should the vesting option be reached, even with another team.

Fair enough. Perhaps my wording was clumsy, as I didn't mean his contract was null and void as obviously the Jays are on the hook for the money, but I've always assumed contingent aspects of the contract, such as incentives and so forth, would be null and void if a new team assumes the pro-rated portion of the contract. We'll see who is right, as I expect Thomas will certainly get picked up if the option is null and void. If it is still in effect, I'd be surprised if someone signs him.

Regardless, we both agree on the important point, which is that is would be an egregious oversight if the Jays were on the hook for Thomas' option even if he was released. And that's not the case, as Campbell indicated.

Chuck - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 02:46 PM EDT (#183080) #

We'll see who is right, as I expect Thomas will certainly get picked up if the option is null and void. If it is still in effect, I'd be surprised if someone signs him.

I agree though it may not be inconceivable that a team like the Twins offers Thomas the weak half of a DH platoon with Kubel, thereby keeping Thomas in MLB and giving him a shot to audition for 2009 and also guaranteeing the Twins that Thomas won't be getting 300 more PAs.

And my guess that his vesting option will still hold is just that, a guess. I really have no idea. I have no more reason to believe that it will hold than it won't, other than I'd imagine Thomas' agent to have been shrewd enough to ensure the wording were favourable to his client.

 

ramone - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 03:17 PM EDT (#183081) #

I notice that Rolen was pinch hit for in the DH spot after three at bats, rehab not going well, or was that all he was supposed to get for the first game back?

Samir - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 03:21 PM EDT (#183082) #
It's shocking when anyone's tenure with a team unravels in 24 hours, but on the whole it seems JP and Gibbons did the right thing for the team.

Frank could have accepted his demotion with a little class and focused on finding his swing, if, as he claims, he still has anything left to find. We don't know what was exchanged between he and Gibbons, but maybe Gibbons could have soft-peddled it a bit more, who knows.

Bottom-line is that if he doesn't want to be on the team, JP had no choice but to cut him. It's unfortunate that his teammates will have to deal with one of their own not wanting to do whatever it takes to win... I can't imagine that will boost morale much, but on the other hand I hope they respect management for trying to put the best lineup every day.
grjas - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 03:26 PM EDT (#183083) #
I think now, in retrospect, the Thomas contract was a mistake

With the power of hindsight, fine, but I am not sure it was at the time. Blair says it best on his recent post:

"But remember, at the time Ricciardi wasn't certain that he'd get Wells locked up and was concerned about Glaus's simmering health issues. Rios was no sure thing then, either. Ricciardi thinks of a teams' offence as a whole"

I think sometimes we forget how difficult it is to attract good free agents to Toronto. A division dominated by two big spenders. A cold, foreign country. 15 years out of the playoffs. The GM needs to get innovative.

Was signing Thomas a risk: sure. Would we have got him without the option. Questionable. Was it an unreasonable risk, I don't think so: see Blair above, plus remember Riccardi's view at the time. Make a splash early in the market for the second year in a row, and hope the attraction of Toronto grows for other free agents.

In retrospect, it wasn't the best deal. At the time, I think it was worth the risk. (Certainly not a boner like the Quantrill trade. That's one for the ages.)

robertdudek - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 03:44 PM EDT (#183084) #
I'm curious. Who will eat crow if/when Thomas signs with another team and starts to mash the ball? Making judgments about Thomas based on a few weeks of data isn't something a rational person should do.

His career is probably nearing the end, but I'd be very surprised if he doesn't outhit an "average" AL DH in 2008.

scottt - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 03:49 PM EDT (#183085) #
It should have minimal effect on the clubhouse morale.

I'm sure the pitchers wants some offense. Overbay might feel uneasy. Rolen and Eckstein might feel pressure to produce. Nothing wrong with that. I'm sure all these guys want to be successful and carry the team.


Is Camp the new setup guy?

ayjackson - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 03:50 PM EDT (#183086) #
I think it all boils down to not wanting to pay that $10m next season.  We all knew he'd start slow.  They would have been fine platooning away his plate appearances, but Thomas wasn't, so he was cut.  We'll likely have Burnett's $11m and THomas' $10m free for next year.  Wells, Hill and Rios must take up a good portion of that, though.
Magpie - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 03:58 PM EDT (#183087) #
Certainly not a boner like the Quantrill trade. That's one for the ages.

But that wasn't even a trade, really. It was a straight salary dump. The identities of the other people involved barely mattered.

You want a boner for the ages, how about including a future Hall of Famer as an extra part thrown-in on top of a swap of bad old shortstops? That's my favourite...
robertdudek - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 04:00 PM EDT (#183088) #
I understand it's about the $10 million next year. However, REAL contending teams don't think about vesting options - they think about maximizing CURRENT production.

What happens, if, for example, Thomas proves that he can still hit and the Jays finish a game back of the wild card. Let's also say that they'll have to spend a few million in 2009 on someone to replace what Thomas would have done. Will that $5-$7 million in savings be worth missing the playoffs in 2008? Of course not.

Like I said, REAL contenders worry about winning. Now.

Perhaps the Jays are just faux contenders after all.

scottt - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 04:06 PM EDT (#183089) #
The faux contenders are now 2-0 without Thomas.
ayjackson - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 04:10 PM EDT (#183090) #

I understand it's about the $10 million next year. However, REAL contending teams don't think about vesting options - they think about maximizing CURRENT production.

What happens, if, for example, Thomas proves that he can still hit and the Jays finish a game back of the wild card. Let's also say that they'll have to spend a few million in 2009 on someone to replace what Thomas would have done. Will that $5-$7 million in savings be worth missing the playoffs in 2008? Of course not.

Like I said, REAL contenders worry about winning. Now.

Perhaps the Jays are just faux contenders after all.

REAL contenders with unlimited payrolls don't think about vesting options.  That would be the Yankees.  Couple that with the fact that the Jays can likely get DH production in excess of Thomas' through July from the likes of Lind, Robinson and Barajas, and that they can add a bat at the trade deadline if they aren't, then this is a good move.

China fan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 04:29 PM EDT (#183091) #
     Robertdudek, you say:  "Making judgments about Thomas based on a few weeks of data isn't something a rational person should do."   But isn't that exactly what the Jays have just done?  So you're saying, basically, that the Jays are irrational, or perhaps downright crazy, and they should have kept Thomas in the lineup longer, because a few weeks is not enough to judge him.  At what point, then, does it become rational to cut him?  Is two months enough?  Three months?  How long should the team carry him along as a burden, just on the hope that he'll suddenly improve drastically?
      I'm also surprised by your prediction that Thomas will be ranked as an above-average DH when 2008 is over.  For this to happen, he'll have to get signed by another team almost immediately and then launch into a pretty incredible tear for the rest of the season. Not impossible, perhaps, but it seems unlikely.
robertdudek - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 04:31 PM EDT (#183092) #
Couple that with the fact that the Jays can likely get DH production in excess of Thomas' through July from the likes of Lind, Robinson and Barajas...

This is far from an established fact. I'm not at all convinced that Thomas is washed up. That's the crux of it. The issue is NOT the $10 million. It is the OPEN question of whether Thomas is washed up or not.

By the way, what are the payrolls of the Angels, Tigers and Red Sox? Do you think they would be concerned about a vesting option if they though that a particular player was an asset for 2008?
Mick Doherty - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 04:35 PM EDT (#183093) #

You want a boner for the ages, how about including a future Hall of Famer as an extra part thrown-in on top of a swap of bad old shortstops? That's my favourite...

I admit, as one not as well-versed in Jay history as most around here, the reference eludes me. Who what when?

I shall now go give myself 40 lashes with something written by Bill James ...

timpinder - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 04:41 PM EDT (#183094) #

I hope the Jays aren't planning on using Barajas as the right side of a DH platoon over the long-term.  I'd personally like to see Zaun and Barajas be catchers, Lind play every day in left field (even if he bats 9th against lefties), with Stairs as the DH against RHP and Stewart as the DH against LHP.  I think that having Lind and Stairs both in the lineup improves the Jays' offense against right-handers, who obviously account for most of the pitchers the Jays will face.  Stewart makes a weak DH against LHP, and a passable 4th outfielder.  Overall, though, I think the Jays are better off without Thomas, both in the short-term and the financial long-term.  I know this season's just begun, but paying Thomas $10 million in 2009 would have limited the Jays' options next year regarding free agent aquisitions.

If Stewart can't cut it as a platoon DH against LHP, it shouldn't be very hard for J.P. to find a right-handed hitting partner for Stairs.  Isn't Craig Wilson still available?  He's had very lopsided splits and has mashed LHP with a .917 OPS over his career.

robertdudek - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 04:43 PM EDT (#183095) #
But isn't that exactly what the Jays have just done?  So you're saying, basically, that the Jays are irrational, or perhaps downright crazy, and they should have kept Thomas in the lineup longer, because a few weeks is not enough to judge him.

Yes the Jays management is irrational to a degree (crazy? no). All major league management teams are. For that matter 99.9% of humanity (including myself) is as well.

 At what point, then, does it become rational to cut him?  Is two months enough?  Three months?  How long should the team carry him along as a burden, just on the hope that he'll suddenly improve drastically?

You know what? He could have started on a tear today against Robertson. Why not ... play him against all lefthanders, give him one or two other starts a week, and reassess the situation in about 4 or 5 weeks. Then you'd have to look at stats like contact%, linedrive%, homeruns per flyball, balls takes to strikes taken ratio. These stats are more granular than OPS and will give you more of the truth faster. If Thomas has fallen off a cliff, it will be very noticeable in these stats after a 2-3 month sample.

I'm also surprised by your prediction that Thomas will be ranked as an above-average DH when 2008 is over.  For this to happen, he'll have to get signed by another team almost immediately and then launch into a pretty incredible tear for the rest of the season. Not impossible, perhaps, but it seems unlikely.

What I mean is that he will have a higher than DH average GPA (1.8*OBP+SLG)/4. Obviously he will likely have fewer HR and RBI because of fewer plate appearances.


Leigh - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 04:50 PM EDT (#183096) #

I admit, as one not as well-versed in Jay history as most around here, the reference eludes me. Who what when?

I shall now go give myself 40 lashes with something written by Bill James ...

I think that the reference is to the Ryne Sandberg trade.
Magpie - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 05:06 PM EDT (#183097) #
the Ryne Sandberg trade.

Yup. The Phillies were trading their ancient shortstop (Larry Bowa) to the Cubs, for a merely old one (Ivan DeJesus), and they tossed in a minor league infielder named Ryne Sandberg as a sweetener.

Sandberg did get 6 at bats as a Phillie before it happened. It's not like he did nothing for them!
The_Game - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 05:15 PM EDT (#183099) #
My opinion of the Toronto Blue Jays organization is at an all time low. They obviously care far more about the bottomline, money, than actually winning games.

Releasing your best hitter (which Thomas was in '07) is never a good thing when you're trying to contend, and the offense is already fairly mediocre in the first place. And to pass it off like he was under performing...wow. He got off to a similar start last year, and still hit better than anybody on the team. Anybody that looks at 60 AB, especially for someone like Frank Thomas, and thinks they are meaningful in any way, is just stupid.

I also have to give it to JP. He really knows how to pick his spots. From what I can see...a majority of the fanbase had jumped off the Frank bandwagon, and had started hating him TJ-Ford style in recent days. This will help his standing with the fans, even though it really shouldn't.

I guess Toronto is going for the great DH pairing of Stairs/Barajas for the rest of the season. What a waste of good pitching it's going to be this year. This team makes me sick.
Ishai - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 05:42 PM EDT (#183100) #
It's too bad that the "clubhouse cancer" angle has been percolating through various media outlets, since it essentially precludes the Jays from signing Bonds without seeming like enormous hypocrites. Bonds is a destructive egomaniac as opposed to the 'positive' egomaniac or however the broadcasters described Thomas in the pregame show.

Does anyone know if Bonds has been staying in game shape? Either way, the Jays won't sign him now.

Against lefties this lineup will be a tale of two halves: Eckstein, Hill, Rios and Wells will mash them good, and the bottom half will be a write off. Not like Thomas was mashing lefties, but his name made the lineup seem a little more prepared: I'm a slave to the world of appearances.

Until Lind is called up and Rolen gets healthy, LF/3B is a blend of indistinguishable mediocrity, but I guess it's not fair to complain about backups.
Simon - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 05:43 PM EDT (#183101) #
If the Jays were just trying to save money, they wouldn't have cut Thomas, they would have kept him and just kept his playing time low enough to keep his option from vesting.  They don't save a penny by releasing him.  Well, maybe a few pennies from low-hanging performance bonuses, but it also costs them about $300,000 due to the roster spot he vacates.  It would make zero sense.

The only reasoning that could actually lead to Thomas being all-the-way cut is the one they've offered - that they think they're better without him than with him playing two-thirds of the time.

Next year's payroll is a factor here, but this isn't just cost-cutting for the sake of cost-cutting.  We're not the Marlins and we're not being screwed around by our team's owners.
Pistol - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 05:52 PM EDT (#183103) #
You know what? He could have started on a tear today against Robertson. Why not ... play him against all lefthanders, give him one or two other starts a week, and reassess the situation in about 4 or 5 weeks. Then you'd have to look at stats like contact%, linedrive%, homeruns per flyball, balls takes to strikes taken ratio. These stats are more granular than OPS and will give you more of the truth faster. If Thomas has fallen off a cliff, it will be very noticeable in these stats after a 2-3 month sample.

That's what the Jays proposed to him and he said he'd rather be released.  I suppose you could force it on him, but I'm not sure that's an ideal situation.

I think it's pretty telling that the players don't seem to be bothered by this.
dogbus - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 05:55 PM EDT (#183104) #
Simon- I see what you're saying but have to somewhat disagree.  I think the Jays release Frank Thomas out of respect for him and his career.  The eat the 8 million and he can move on and continue to play.  It is (somewhat) about the money in the sense that they have no intention of bringing him back next year.  He is not a $10 million dollar player.  If he sits on the bench it does nobody any good.  He would bring down morale, cause distraction and be generally uphappy.  Now they can move forward with what they have and save the $10 million next year. 

To get to the point:  The reason you know it is primarily about money is because I promise you that if Frank Thomas did not have a 10 million dollar option next year, if he was simply a free agent, end of story- They would keep him for the entire season.  Let him warm up in his usual fashion and have him produce 100 RBI and a .290 + average.  

G Baier - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 05:58 PM EDT (#183105) #
A point that seems to have been ignored to this point is not just how poorly Thomas was hitting but the ripple effects through the lineup that his poor hitting resulted in. I certainly recall a  few times in the last week or so that Vernon and Rios were being very carefully pitched (less good stuff to hit) because the opponents knew that Thomas was up next and there wasn't a lot to worry about after him either. Teams were gambling on the Jays doing exactly what they did - getting lots of walks and singles but not having a chance to drive many home. If that one thing changes over the next week or two this might look like a smart move.

I was most surprised by how poorly Thomas reacted - there must have been more to it. As I recall  even A-Rod was quieter when he was shifted around by Torre during the playoffs because of poor production - and he's A-Rod for crying out loud. Gibbons obviously doesn't command the same respect as Torre among future Hall of Famers, but acting out after one day of an overdue benching? I know the implication was that it would be more, but certainly he'd have the chance to  prove them wrong with 3 games a week  and a nervous manager and GM wouldn't keep benching a hot stick. I guess letting him try to find a groove and releasing him when he got closer to 300 PAs this year would have looked way too manipulative - if anything doing it know seems to make the team look more sincere about it not being about next year's $10 mil.
ChicagoJaysFan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 06:00 PM EDT (#183106) #
They don't save a penny by releasing him.  Well, maybe a few pennies from low-hanging performance bonuses, but it also costs them about $300,000 due to the roster spot he vacates.  It would make zero sense.

Blair says they save $6.7 million by doing this, however Bastian says they're responsible for the full salary.

I don't know the intricacies of the contract or the MLB CBA, so I can't speak for certain, although I would tend to agree with you that they're responsible for the whole thing.

Pistol - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 06:17 PM EDT (#183107) #
There's no way the Jays don't owe Thomas his money this year.  Blair has that wrong.
Lefty - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 06:58 PM EDT (#183108) #

It didn't take a rocket scientist to figure out this would end badly with the vesting option attached to the contract. Two seasons pay for a seasons work. Poor, poor judgement by Ricciardi.

I'm in the same camp as those who would have played this senario out longer. As Robert Dudek said, would the Yankee's, Angels or Red Sox be looking at next years options in the first month of this season, a season where they are supposed to compete.

Mr. Godfrey sir, er Sir Godfrey, respectfully sir, give your head a shake. The faith of the faithfull is being stretched once again.

scottt - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 07:40 PM EDT (#183109) #
5 runs, 10 hits, that was more like it.

"Toronto has got a whole slew of good arms," Leyland said. "They're deep in their pitching, very, very deep. It's very impressive."

Thomas is .333 .500 .600  career against Robertson. I don't see how he walks away from today's game if he's so determined to play every day.

Was Thomas unwilling to hit lower than 5th?

This wasn't planned 2 days ago, otherwise they would not have have taken Banks off the 40 man roster just to create a vacancy the next day.

I wouldn't mind seeing Diaz get some at bats against lefties. I don't expect him to start behind the plate.

The countdown to Lind's return is started. It's going to tick down with every game the Jays score less than 4 runs.



Dave Till - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 07:42 PM EDT (#183110) #
My first thought: wow, that was fast. I assume that his public petulance was the deciding factor, not salary concerns: if the Jays play Thomas now, Gibbons and/or Ricciardi will lose face. Showing up your employer(s) is not a good way to improve job security, especially when you're hitting .167.

My second thought: is one of the crankier Toronto sportswriters going to write a "Yay Big Hurt, boo J.P." column for tomorrow's paper (or maybe the day after's, if he needed to play phone tag to get him)? I can just imagine someone trying to reach Thomas, looking for juicy quotes for a slam article. We'll see, I guess.

My third thought: of course, Frank Thomas is going to react angrily to any suggestion that he be benched or platooned - he's probably never been benched in his life. And of course he won't agree that he's losing it - he sincerely believes that it's just a slump, that he hasn't grown old. (Denial is part of what makes us human. But I digress.)

I suspect that somebody will give Thomas a look. If he has anything left at all, the new team will see him at his best - he'll be double-dog motivated to show those so-and-sos in Toronto that he can still get around on the fastball, yes sir. It will take two or three releases to force Thomas to face reality - assuming, of course, that he is actually done, and isn't in a slump.

By the way: slugging percentages for Thomas, last four years including this one: .590, .545, .480, .333.

King Ryan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 07:42 PM EDT (#183111) #
As a fan of the Jays and a bigger fan of the Big Hurt, I am extremely sad and somewhat mad about this move.

No roster should ever be made before the calendar turns to May.  Just completely ridiculous.

Frank has a long history of hitting like crazy after being pronounced dead.  Let's hope this one doesn't come back to bite the Jays.

Sigh...

sweat - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 07:46 PM EDT (#183112) #
is it possible that Frank's ego allowed him to ask for his release with a very small buyoout?  This way, any future team would not be discouraged from signing him due to his 3rd year PA option?
Leigh - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 07:48 PM EDT (#183113) #
Breaking News

David Ortiz (.141/.247/.225), Alfonso Soriano (.175/.230/.298), Jason Giambi (.116/.291/.302), Carlos Delgado (.213/.329/.311) and Paul Konerko (.172/.319/.362) NOT released!

Petey Baseball - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 07:56 PM EDT (#183114) #
Hell if Bonds to the Blue Jays is crazy, how about Travis Snider getting the call? DH Lind and put Snider in left everyday. Keep Stairs on the bench as a backup 1B/LF.
Its a little sad to see the Big Hurt leave in such a fashion, but its a sign that there its a sense of urgency back in this organization. No longer will this team sit around and wait for things to happen, and its about damn time.  At the same point last year, the team was basically in the same situation and saw a late April, early May nosedive destroy the season.  Thomas was awful, and stayed awful through that stretch and had a terrible rest of May. Not this year, says J.P., and good on him.



Rob - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 07:56 PM EDT (#183115) #
There's no way the Jays don't owe Thomas his money this year.  Blair has that wrong.

If you actually read it, he has it right (emphasis mine):

Getting rid of Thomas saves the Blue Jays from paying his $10-million (all figures U.S.) option for next season, but they are still required to pay the pro-rated portion of this year's $8-million (all figures U.S.) salary, which is about $6.7-million.
King Ryan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 07:56 PM EDT (#183116) #
And of course he won't agree that he's losing it - he sincerely believes that it's just a slump, that he hasn't grown old.

But if you listen to what he's been saying -- it's hard to disagree.  Frank's words are that he's been hitting the ball hard, and it's been right at people.  Is that incorrect? From watching the games, it sure seems like he's been hitting the ball well in many occasions.  I don't know what his BABIP is, but I am guessing it is miniscule. 

I don't understand the idea that this is "punishment" for Frank's outrage.  Shouldn't we be glad that Frank was upset? Means he cares.  I would have been surprised/disappointed if he were apathetic about being benched.  Doesn't the media always yap about "passion"? About "fire in the belly?"  Frank wants to play.  He was upset about not playing, as he should be.  Maybe he'll hit better when he's mad.  

This whole thing is beyond stupid.  Running a still-productive future hall of famer out of town because of a poor three weeks...wow. 

The Jays are never going to make the playoffs with this prima donna as GM.
King Ryan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 07:58 PM EDT (#183117) #
Hell if Bonds to the Blue Jays is crazy, how about Travis Snider getting the call? DH Lind and put Snider in left everyday. Keep Stairs on the bench as a backup 1B/LF.

I know! Let's bring back Reed Johnson! He's hitting .349 so far this year.  He must be better than Thomas.
Mylegacy - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 08:05 PM EDT (#183118) #

The Dunedin Jay's website says; Rolen flied out to CF in the first, lined out to CF in the 3rd and popped out to 1st in the 5th.

Thomas, Stairs and Gibby all created this mess. The Frankster should have taken the benching with grace and campaigned  to be a platoon DH with Stairs - at least until he got hot (IF - he got hot). If TB picks him up, as is rumoured - August and September could get uncomfortable. Stairs had a LOT to do with the mess too. Stairs has looked zoned in this past week while Frank as been flailing. Gibby has his problem too. Win or so-long Gibbster. Gibby knows we (he) just can't give up April and May.

By mid-May Lind and Rolen will be into the flow of things and with Rios, Wells, Hill, Stairs and Overbay we'll have enough hitting if the pitching holds up.

The pitching - wow. Who'd-a thought that we'd find Carlson, Purcey and Camp all making meaningful contributions this early in 08?

On Purcey - what we saw is the Purcey we've kept in the minors these past few years - tons of stuff but no control. HOWEVER, this was the one off - Purcey has turned it around starting last fall into this spring and his wildness his first Big League game was just nerves. Even the way he was - he's as good as AJ.  Lookin' forward to our two supplemental picks for AJ in the 09 draft.

Rotoworld is saying Robinson Diaz is being called up. The 6' 225" right handed hitter in 38 AAA at bats is hitting 368/390/553 with 2BB/3SO. He's killing lefties at a 563 clip and his only homerun in 16 at bats. In 22 at bats he's hitting righties at an ugly 227 clip. The way we've been getting beat up by lefties he might be a useful addition.

Dave Till - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 08:17 PM EDT (#183119) #
But if you listen to what he's been saying -- it's hard to disagree.  Frank's words are that he's been hitting the ball hard, and it's been right at people.  Is that incorrect?

In my experience, every single player who has gotten old says the exact same thing - no, it's just a slump, I can still hit, just you wait. Aging athletes are (almost) always in a state of denial. And you can't really expect him to say anything else, when you think of it - Thomas is not going to go and say, "Yep, they were right. I can't hit a 93 miles per hour fastball any more, even if you let me use a cricket bat. I'm done like dinner."

Thomas's opinions on this subject cannot be treated as reliable.

(From what I've seen of him, he's in deep trouble. He has been overpowered a lot lately; I think he's lost his bat speed. But I don't know that for sure. That's what makes baseball fun.)
Samir - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 08:18 PM EDT (#183120) #
Breaking News Baseball has cracked down on steroid and HGH use.... many stars fall to earth.
Pistol - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 08:46 PM EDT (#183122) #
If you actually read it, he has it right (emphasis mine):

I think the article may have been reworded from the original post online.  Or maybe I just read it wrong.

More confirmation that the Jays don't owe the vesting option:
Keith Law Posted: April 20, 2008 at 08:17 PM (#2752302)
Just in case anyone is still wondering, the Jays are on the hook for all the guaranteed money in Thomas' contract, which means the remainder of his salary for 2008. They're not on the hook for the option, unless there was also a buyout involved, which doesn't appear to be the case here.
robertdudek - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 09:07 PM EDT (#183123) #
Frank Thomas never really had great bat speed. He was a great hitter because he is extremely patient and (was) extremely strong. Obviously he is not the hitter he was 12 years ago, but we already knew that two years ago. It would be really strange for him to drastically fall off from what he did in 2006/07 unless there is something seriously wrong with him physically (e.g his eyes have gone bad).

It's very likely that Frank Thomas still has something left in the tank. I'll wager even money up to $100 that he exceeds a .260 GPA this season. His Marcel for 2008 projects a .280 GPA (.360 OBP/.470 SLG).

So I ask again - if you were to balance the evidence ... why does 3 weeks of poor RESULTS lead you to believe that he's washed up.

Dave Till - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 09:24 PM EDT (#183125) #
An amusing data point: at this exact moment, Frank Thomas has a higher OPS than Troy Glaus.
Mick in Ithaca - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 09:36 PM EDT (#183126) #
I think that if Thomas had accepted the (partial) benching (ie. playing against lefties, pinch-hitting, maybe getting another start or two per week) AND had eventually started to hit as he did last year, he would've been back to playing every day, and most certainly would've gotten the necessary plate appearances for the vesting option to kick in (unless the Jays collapsed and were out of it early). So I don't think this was about money. Frank didn't want that role, even for a (relatively) short time. And maybe it would've taken him LONGER than 2 months to start hitting regularly without everyday playing time. So they sat down, and let Frank go because that's what he wanted, under the circumstances. He wasn't released because he wasn't hitting. He was released because he was being given a reduced role, and he didn't like it. The reduced role was justified, and if he'd started to hit as he did last year, he would've had his role un-reduced. And he'd have been here next year. He's the one who made it about money yesterday when he was griping. And that may just have been politics. He maybe wanted the release rather than the platoon.

All in all, I think it's best this happened now. To me, it looked like he'd lost something. He kept stretching out at bats and drawing walks in circumstances where putting the ball in play was what was needed. The double off Delcarmen was a poor pitch, off-speed, right up in his wheelhouse. You could see him recognize it right away. The homer was a guess, it looked like; to me he looked surprised to have hit it so well, and it went a long way. A good pitch that made you think Frank was back. But he hasn't done anything similar since, so I'm inclined to think it was a lucky one. There are some rumbles around the net that you've probably read where scouts are supposedly saying he has lost some bat speed. I wanted to ask Wilner if he knew anything about that today, but couldn't get on.

Frank is a fun player to watch when he's right. And not much fun when he isn't. Hope he catches on somewhere, and does well. But I think this was a good move since he wasn't going to accept the role he was offered.

robertdudek - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 09:58 PM EDT (#183128) #
This is the thing I don't understand:

Game 1: Frank Thomas is going to be our regular DH - he's going to get some days off against some righties, but otherwise he'll be in there.

to:

Game 18: Frank Thomas is now a bench player.

I don't understand how this kind of change can take place in 3 weeks. It is absurd.

I don't understand why the Jays didn't quietly give him a couple of days off, and thereafter sit him occasionally against a tough righty and say NOTHING to the media about a "changed role". Just say - "Frank needs a bit of a breather, but he's still our main guy at DH". End of story.

IF Thomas is still underwater in 6 weeks, then we can make some educated guesses about whether or not he's washed up and go from there.

Once again it appears that this administration reacts (i.e overreacts)  to events, rather than having a well thought out plan and following it with some conviction.

King Ryan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 10:09 PM EDT (#183130) #
I absolutely agree with you, Robert.

I said the same thing on BTF yesterday.  Why did the Jays feel the need to say they were benching him? Just say you're giving him a rest because he's 40 years old and has an injury history and you want to keep him fresh for the playoffs.  This whole thing is asinine from the beginning to the end. 

Magpie - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 10:21 PM EDT (#183131) #
I suspect the organization has simply decided that Adam Lind is ready now, and it's time to clear a spot for him. He'll be coming up in a few days, just as soon as his neck is fine. And when that happens, there's simply no room for both Stairs and Thomas. (There can be only one!) And there are a number of good reasons to choose Stairs in that case.

They could have kept Thomas around until then to DH against left-handers, except there aren't any on the schedule. And I get the impression that the big fellow wasn't much interested in hanging around for a few days on the off chance that he might get a pinch hit AB here and there. If it's over, it's over. Pack your bags and move on.

If Lind was ready to play today, instead of a few days from now, this probably wouldn't seem quite as odd.



electric carrot - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 10:25 PM EDT (#183132) #
This incident is kind of wearing out the neurons in my head which are firing in all directions at once. To me this feels complex in a way that's also complicated.

ON the one hand, I really don't buy the argument that Frank's all of a sudden done. It does seem to me that he would in time rebound to a year that's a little worse that last year. That just seems like common sense.

On the other hand I think the Jays are embracing a new model of offense this year. It's less sit back and wait for the monster homerun and more let's make it happen on the basepaths and with sacrifice bunts etc ... It's less piling on and winning 10-3 against the pitcher's off day and more like winning 2-1 against pitcher's like Wang, Beckett and Bedard on a good day.

Frank Thomas -- let's face it is not that kind of player right now.

So I do see Thomas coming back and biting the Jays later in the year because I think he will catch on somewhere and be good in the way one might expect him to be good.

Still I am so excited by this new brand of ball and with giving Lind a chance to be a part of it that right now if I'm totally honest about it as a FAN I'm kind of thrilled and I HOPE that this new brand of ball works out and that it takes the jays all the way.

And also as a fan of Thomas I kind of hope he does come back and haunt the Jays a bit with some exceptional play later on in the year.




GregJP - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 10:49 PM EDT (#183133) #
Still I am so excited by this new brand of ball and with giving Lind a chance to be a part of it that right now if I'm totally honest about it as a FAN I'm kind of thrilled and I HOPE that this new brand of ball works out and that it takes the jays all the way.

Yeah we don't want guys like Frank clogging up the bases while the Jays bunt and steal bases.
GregJP - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 10:53 PM EDT (#183134) #
Let him warm up in his usual fashion and have him produce 100 RBI and a .290 + average. 

I think you mistook this forum for Wilner's post game phone in segment.
King Ryan - Sunday, April 20 2008 @ 11:36 PM EDT (#183135) #
Yeah we don't want guys like Frank clogging up the bases while the Jays bunt and steal bases.

It's a real sad state of affairs when I'm not even sure if this post is sarcastic.
The_Game - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 12:09 AM EDT (#183137) #

"It's a real sad state of affairs when I'm not even sure if this post is sarcastic."

It's definitely sarcastic.

I think.

TamRa - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 12:32 AM EDT (#183138) #
Perhaps there is wording suggesting that the vesting only occurs if the required PAs are accumulated with the Jays (your assumption, if I read you correctly). Perhaps the wording is such that any team taking on the contract (even though they'd just be paying roughly $300K of the $10M owed in 2008) is the team that must honour the vesting option (my assumption). Perhaps, but almost totally unlikely (what would be the point of employing lawyers if this slipped through?), is that the Jays themselves would be on the hook for the money in 2009 should the vesting option be reached, even with another team.

Chuck, it's worth noting that other players with option years have been released before and signed with another team and in no case is it ever an issue whether the new team will keep the player for the option year or let him go. The new team is not party to the agreement which included an option.

It simply never has and never will happen. There is NO circumstance in which the Jays will have to pay the 10 million in 2009.

NONE.

The Jays were said to have granted Thomas his "unconditional release"

per the rules, a team CAN claim him (which won't happen) but even if it did he could refuse and be a free agent. Either circumstance - another team claiming his contract or his becoming a free agent - releases the Jays from future obligation:

Unconditional Release Waivers
A club that wishes to release a player places him on unconditional release waivers. He then may be claimed for $1, but the player may choose to refuse the claim and become a free agent.

Anders - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 12:43 AM EDT (#183139) #
Breaking News Baseball has cracked down on steroid and HGH use.... many stars fall to earth.

If the implication here is that Thomas was a performance enhancing drug user I would suggest that that is wildly off base. He has been outspoken about drug use his entire career, and came into the majors the human giant that he is.
Hodgie - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 12:52 AM EDT (#183140) #

Breaking News

David Ortiz (.141/.247/.225), Alfonso Soriano (.175/.230/.298), Jason Giambi (.116/.291/.302), Carlos Delgado (.213/.329/.311) and Paul Konerko (.172/.319/.362) NOT released!

....in other Breaking News, Ortiz, Soriano, Konerko are 32, Delgado 35, and Giambi 37 and only Giambi's Yankees are more than .5 games out of first.

I honestly don't understand the vitriol over this decision. The truth of the matter is NO-ONE knows for certain that Frank has anything left in the tank. The only really surprising element is that people are convinced that it is impossible for a soon to be 40 year old player to have fallen off a cliff. History has generally not been kind to 40 year olds not named Bonds. As has already been noted, his slugging percentages have been in sharp decline the last couple of seasons and his OPS+ last year was the second lowest of his career for a full season.

Frank has attributed his slow start to bad luck and with a BABIP of .159 that might make sense. However, could that figure also be influenced by a LD% of 12.8% and a GB% of 31.9%? The numbers would seem to at least partially support the game day observations that Frank is just not hitting the ball all that hard. To my untrained and admittedly amateurish eye, Thomas has become a mistake hitter, constantly guessing at the plate. Frank himself mentioned the second homerun of Delcarmen was a guess on the fastball, considering Delcarmen had bemoaned the fact that Frank had beat him on his second best pitch (the slider) the game earlier.

Again, I don't know that the end of very good production for Frank is here, but at his age it is certainly a very realistic possibility. Call it what you will, I at least applaud the Jays for essentially deciding that they had made a mistake and moving on instead of using the "typical slow start" crutch as justification for keeping what they had now evaluated as a potential sink hole in the lineup for another couple of months. The fact of the matter is they need production, and they need it now.

GregJP - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 12:55 AM EDT (#183141) #
It's a real sad state of affairs when I'm not even sure if this post is sarcastic.

What's sad is that 50% of Jays' fans, other team's fans, television broadcasters, and print journalists would completely miss the sarcasm in such a statement.

While this message board is relatively moron free, the average person who watches baseball really has no clue what is important when it comes to scoring runs or winning baseball games.  I guess the fact that Joe Morgan is on national TV once a week is partly to blame.

As to the Frank Thomas situation, I'm torn on the issue.  On one hand, I think he would have come around and ended up the team's 3rd or 4th best hitter, but on the other hand it seems to be all about Frank and reaching 600 HR.  Listening to Lyle Overbay after todays game I got the sense that he wasn't all that broken up about Frank's departure.
nanook - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 01:33 AM EDT (#183143) #
Part of me is sorry to see Mr. 600 go, but I'm surprised by all the negative comments. It was just a couple of weeks ago I got flamed for even calling him Mr. 600.
A guy doesn't go from being a clubhouse cancer (Chisox) to being all sweetness and light overnight.
Regardless of his stats last year and his Hall of Fame numbers, all I've seen from the Big Hurt is an unwillingness to sacrifice himself for the team.
And even if we assume he'd eventually find enough mediocre fastballs, thrown somewhere near the middle of the strike zone, to eventually churn out 25 dingers and 80 RBI, I'm quite confident Matt Stairs and or Adam Lind can approximate those numbers for markedly less than $9 mil per.
I'm quite happy to take a look at the future (and maybe even dream a little) than watch the past (strikeout).
soupman - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 01:40 AM EDT (#183144) #
While this message board is relatively moron free, the average person who watches baseball really has no clue what is important when it comes to scoring runs or winning baseball games.  I guess the fact that Joe Morgan is on national TV once a week is partly to blame.

Even a certain site that shall remain nameless doesn't suggest that Joe Morgan has a poor grasp on the game - I get the impression that you're just trolling


King Ryan - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 03:02 AM EDT (#183147) #
Joe Morgan was an excellent baseball player.

That doesn't mean he knows anything about strategy.  Just as a great soldier doesn't necessarily know anything about battle strategy.

Glevin - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 06:33 AM EDT (#183148) #
This whole thing just seems like a mess. An obvious money-saving move (so his option for next year does not automatically kick in) the Jays handled this very poorly. Thomas has gotten off to very poor starts each of the last two years so I love how a poor 60 ABs this year means he is done or something. LAst year he had an OK April and in May hit .343/.373 and was great after that. In 2006, he was .190/.264/.405 in April and finished with 39 HRs. He's had 60 ABs for crying out loud. He's hit 65 HRs over the previous 2 years. Is he done? Maybe. But, I'd take a chance on him over Shannon Stewart by a mile. Stewart has definitely been done since 2004.  The JAys had nothing to lose by seeing if he could regain his stroke. They DHd Rod Barajas yesterday. Rod Barajas is not even a good hitting catcher. The Jays are a worse team now than they were a few days ago. And as for all this talk about the difficulty of attrcting free agents to Toronto, how exactly will a stunt like this help?
James W - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 07:13 AM EDT (#183149) #

If the implication here is that Thomas was a performance enhancing drug user I would suggest that that is wildly off base. He has been outspoken about drug use his entire career, and came into the majors the human giant that he is.

While not entirely knowing the original poster's intent, he could be pointing out that since Frank is almost certainly not a PED user, he's facing the normal late-career flame out that regular people face.  Unlike people who almost certainly were PED users, and managed to have near-career years at ages 40 to 43. 

Samir - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 10:01 AM EDT (#183157) #
Anders/James, My post was actually supposed to appear right after the one titled "Breaking News" noting that a bunch of players like Konerko, Delgado, Thome and Soriano are struggling mightily. I only intended to point out that we should not be surprised if many current and former stars suffer major declines this year, and over the next several years as PED testing becomes more sophisticated. Even now, I believe some MLB players are finding ways to cheat the system, just as athletes in other sports with more rigorous testing have found ways to cheat (e.g. Marion Jones). Thomas has always had a 'clean' reputation, and I didn't intend to cast doubt on that... on the other hand, it seems more realistic to doubt everyone at this point... doesn't it?
robertdudek - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 12:01 PM EDT (#183170) #
On the other hand I think the Jays are embracing a new model of offense this year. It's less sit back and wait for the monster homerun and more let's make it happen on the basepaths and with sacrifice bunts etc ... It's less piling on and winning 10-3 against the pitcher's off day and more like winning 2-1 against pitcher's like Wang, Beckett and Bedard on a good day.
Frank Thomas -- let's face it is not that kind of player right now.


Yes, a valid point-of-view. But then if they really had this idea and were not flying by the seat of their pants, why didn't they dump Thomas in the off-season and keep Reed Johnson - EXACTLY the type of player you'd want if you were serious about taking this approach. Reed is a far better defender and baserunner than Stewart and frankly would look REALLY good as a 4th outfielder for a Lind-Wells-Rios starting outfield.
electric carrot - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 01:13 PM EDT (#183183) #
robertdudek:

Excellent point about Johnson. I sort of bought into the idea that perhaps his injury was worse than we knew. But so far as a Cub he's looked good. Maybe one day we'll get an insider's look at what everyone was actually thinking. Right now it looks as though they think Stewart's a better offensive threat overall as his career numbers suggest -- and one assumes he can still run a little on the basepaths -- which does fit that style. For now I'm withholding judgment till I get a better picture for what roles Lind and Stewart play in the new Jays ideology.
GregJP - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 01:18 PM EDT (#183184) #
Even a certain site that shall remain nameless doesn't suggest that Joe Morgan has a poor grasp on the game - I get the impression that you're just trolling

He doesn't have a poor grasp of the mechanics of "playing" the game, but he does have a poor grasp of the meta strategy involved in maximizing the chances of scoring runs and winning games.  He also has a poor grasp in terms of evaluating players, as he tends to use antiquated and basically irrelevant metrics.

Now he's all proud of himself for actually knowing that Hanley Ramirez is a very good player.  The problem is, while Hanley is a great hitter, he's NOT a great fielder by any defensive metric out there.  So Joe basically further cemented his "moron" status yesterday by saying Hanley was a great fielder at a very important defensive position.
GregJP - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 03:35 PM EDT (#183194) #
What's sad is that 50% of Jays' fans, other team's fans, television broadcasters, and print journalists would completely miss the sarcasm in such a statement.

Exhibit #1.

http://www.thestar.com/article/416532

Yes, he reached base 100 times on walks and hit-by-pitch, but most times that was just clogging the basepaths.

How does this guy keep his job?  This article is a complete joke on so many levels.
grjas - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 06:11 PM EDT (#183205) #
How does this guy keep his job?  This article is a complete joke on so many levels.

I'd love to know how the Bill Caudill deal didn't make Griffin's list, to name just one..
robertdudek - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 07:33 PM EDT (#183214) #
I nominate the Roger Clemens signing as the worst ever; it gave us false hope.
Dave Till - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 08:47 PM EDT (#183219) #
Strictly speaking, Caudill wasn't a free agent signing - they acquired him in a trade, and then gave him a contract extension when he got here. Unfortunately, he lost his fastball the season he got to Toronto.

The worst free agent signing might have been Ken Dayley, who pitched something like five innings in a Jays uniform. I think he had vertigo problems.

I've always assumed that Reed Johnson wanted to be the starting left fielder, and not a good fourth outfielder. He would have been unhappy had he stayed here. Stewart is happy to be playing anywhere, and won't object to reverting to a bench role if Lind is given the left field job.

ChicagoJaysFan - Monday, April 21 2008 @ 09:22 PM EDT (#183221) #
If Frank Thomas is in the discussion of worst free agent signing, I don't know how Jack Morris doesn't top him.

Jack Morris was the second highest paid player in baseball when we signed him.

For the 2nd highest salary in baseball, you expect a bunch more than what he gave us.  He gave us a plus first year - not too different than Thomas (albeit at different positions), but Thomas wasn't the highest paid hitter or second highest paid player.  I think you expect a lot more than a 102 ERA+ and 1.6 K/BB from the second highest paid player in baseball.  240 innings is really nice, but those are #3 or #4 numbers on a contending team.  In his second year, we probably would have been better off cutting him 3 weeks in as opposed to dealing with the 1.7 WHIP and 70 ERA+.

Think about this ... in today's market, 15 years after we signed Jack Morris, would you be happy if we paid $5.4 MM for a starter and got 150 innings, a 1.7 WHIP, a 6.19 ERA (70 ERA+), and 1.7 K/BB?  I'd say today, that's not great value.  However, that's what he was paid for his 1993 season.  Think about how prices have inflated. 

Basically, I think the Jack Morris signing was not too different than if we gave Thomas something like a 2 year $35-40 MM contract.  But no one questions individual contracts when you're winning world series.
soupman - Tuesday, April 22 2008 @ 06:30 AM EDT (#183231) #
Well, considering there are about 10 different ways of measuring defence, and last I checked none are much more efficient than models for predicting pitcher development - I guess we can agree to disagree.

The main tenent of 'moneyball' [as i read it] is to exploit inefficiencies - when everyone starts overvaluing OBP and HR and that type of run production (which has happened to a wider degree than most in the cult of stats like to think) it creates a niche for "small ball" teams.
Asides from the RedSox who have the 2nd highest payroll in the history of the sport - the Cards won with the 11th highest; Sox with the 13th highest in 2005; the Sox, year in year out spending the 2nd most secured another championship; and in 2003 Florida won with the 20th highest payroll.
2 of those teams play in a league in which they are foolish enough to think that a pitcher should bat; and the other team made headlines for Ozzie being Ozzie - or in other words flaunting his lack of meta-strategy (whatever the difference might be).
Its easy to account for the Red Sox winning - but how do you account for NL teams and the ChiSox? They certainly didn't have the best stats...




robertdudek - Tuesday, April 22 2008 @ 07:36 PM EDT (#183298) #
Its easy to account for the Red Sox winning - but how do you account for NL teams and the ChiSox? They certainly didn't have the best stats...

A) The rules mandate that one team from each league play in the World Series.

B) Luck.


Mike D - Wednesday, April 23 2008 @ 02:21 AM EDT (#183306) #
If you'll permit me to add some nuance to Robert's point...

Anything can happen in a short series. The '06 Cardinals were undoubtedly lucky to be World Champions. Any team that goes 10 games under .500 from May 24th onward should not be in the postseason at all. Luckily for them, the rest of the Central stunk, which meant plenty of easy regular season games plus no team passing them in the standings. They won three short series, in which anything can happen...even Jeff Weaver pitching respectably.

The '05 White Sox are often called lucky, but they won 99 games and went 11-1 in the playoffs. They had four pitchers who had good seasons while logging well over 200 IP -- an extraordinarily rare and valuable luxury for a club. They had a great bullpen (certainly aided by four workhorses in the rotation) and good D. They supported their pitching with 200 homers. I think Ozzie's curious tactics got vastly more credit than they deserved, but also gave rise to a backlash inference of dumb luck that I don't think was fair. Maybe you can say that their rotation's health was lucky, but by the same token, the Red Sox were lucky their team bus didn't crash last year, no?

I do agree, Soupman, that too often baseball analysts have equated "luck" with "outcomes my models didn't predict." They are very different things.
Thomas - Wednesday, April 23 2008 @ 11:12 AM EDT (#183334) #
I've always assumed that Reed Johnson wanted to be the starting left fielder, and not a good fourth outfielder. He would have been unhappy had he stayed here.

Dave, is there any basis for this besides your assumption? Johnson's been a platoon player basically the entire time he was with Toronto and never seemed particularly unhappy about it. I'm sure he would have rather been a starter, but I've never read about him sulking or speaking out because he wasn't getting playing time. Plus, Johnson would have earned more money had he stayed with the Jays (his contract here over a full year was worth more than the 1/6th the Jays had to pay plus the amount the Cubs guaranteed him). Johnson's not a guy who's ever going to sign a big-money free agent contract, so that extra million and a half could have made a big difference to him and his family.

Sure, he might be able to parlay more regular playing time with the Cubs into a bigger contract this offseason than he would have got staying with Toronto, but there's no guarantee of that. There was also no guarantee that Felix Pie would not have got off to a hot start and relegated Johnson to real bench duties, as opposed to the platoon situation he had in Toronto. That's still a possibility. Things look to be working out well for him so far, but I've never heard anything that indicated he was unwilling to be a bench/platoon player or would have been a distraction if he wasn't starting. Maybe you have information that indicates otherwise but I've never heard anything that says he was unhappy playing for the Jays.

Blue Jays Release Frank Thomas | 109 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.