Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
So what's going on?

Tim Kurkjian on ESPNews (the television station; nothing online yet) reports that the Yankees are back in the Santana sweepstakes -- surprise! Hank Steinbrenner was misleading everyone about the "deadline"! -- which may push the Red Sox to sweeten their offer, apparently since the Dodgers are also now in discussion with the Twinkies.

Speaking of the Dodgers, the Andruw Jones deal has apparently jacked up Aaron Rowand's asking price, even with LAD now out of the bidding ... and yes, Barry Bonds is talking to Oakland (another "surprise!", right?) but has some, um, hurdles to clear first.

What are you hearing?




Weekend Update | 50 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
ANationalAcrobat - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 04:27 PM EST (#177324) #
My regulars - Rotoworld, Baseball Think Factory, The Globe and Mail - are getting sort of slow. What baseball sites do you guys check out regularly?
92-93 - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 05:32 PM EST (#177325) #
mlbtraderumors.com, thehardballtimes.com, and of course wilner at fan590.com
Flex - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 05:34 PM EST (#177326) #
Inside the dome has an editorial up about the prospect of trading Rios:

Darn Safari browser won't let me embed a link so here it is:

http://bluejays.scout.com/2/709424.html
timpinder - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 05:44 PM EST (#177327) #

Sabean says he'll probably decide on Rios for Lincecum within the next couple of days.  He added, "...we want to get on to other business if we're going to pass on this".  Sounds like they're leaning against the trade, and he says he wants to try to get another pitcher to lessen the blow.

http://www.mercurynews.com/giantsheadlines/ci_7669450?nclick_check&nclick_check=1

greenfrog - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 06:04 PM EST (#177329) #
I think Sabean's comments could be read either way. According to the article (which is linked on mlbtraderumors.com),

Sabean hinted that he was trying to finagle another pitcher to "lessen the pain" of losing Lincecum. While it's rumored that Detroit is looking to deal newly acquired left-hander Dontrelle Willis, the Giants probably don't have the chips to get the Oakland native.

To me, Sabean's wanting to decide in the next couple of days suggests that he may pull the trigger. (If I were him, I'd do it, too.) Where else is he going to find a five-tool, cornerstone, blossoming, in-his-prime outfielder to patrol center or right field for the next five years or so? And he may be worried that the Jays are going to withdraw their offer (or trade Rios to someone else, like Baltimore).

parrot11 - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 06:55 PM EST (#177330) #

You know what they say, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time. Little Stein, what exactly do you hope to accomplish with all these silly deadlines?

As for what Sabean is saying, he seems to want to expand the deal. At least we'll know one way or other whether this deal gets done.

timpinder - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 07:05 PM EST (#177331) #
I don't see how this deal can be expanded much.  The Giants don't really have anything else on the major league roster that the Jays would want, unless you think Frandsen can play a major league SS.  If the Jays add a starting pitcher to the deal, then it should be for Cain, not Lincecum.
Chuck - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 07:36 PM EST (#177332) #

Tim Kurkjian on ESPNews (the television station; nothing online yet) reports that the Yankees are back in the Santana sweepstakes

Phew. I was worried we might go a day without hearing about Santana.

There's an interesting exchange going on over at BTF with Keith Law, Rob Neyer and Rockies' beat writer Tracy Ringolsby (using the handle "ballfan") all at the center of the shitestorm, and all participating in the dialogue.

parrot11 - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 08:30 PM EST (#177333) #

There's an interesting exchange going on over at BTF with Keith Law, Rob Neyer and Rockies' beat writer Tracy Ringolsby (using the handle "ballfan") all at the center of the shitestorm, and all participating in the dialogue.

I doubt that it's really Rob Neyer and Tracy Ringolsby, but rather people claiming to be them. My feeling on whether Neyer and Law should get ballots is that there needs to be some type of minimum amount of time working in print. A case could be made for Neyer, but not for Law. Keith Law hasn't been working for ESPN long enough. They can't just allow any person who works for the media for a few years ballots. Otherwise, Steve Phillips should get one, and so should a whole bunch of other people.

jgadfly - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 09:47 PM EST (#177334) #
What am I hearing? Baseball Prospectus'  Joe Sheehan's Friday afternoon "Chat" on the question "Fukodome - Pads, Cubs or Other ?" ...His answer : " Other. I think this one is going to come out of the blue " ... Hmm!  Should I read more than I should into that.  Sabean's answer in the next few days?  Fukudome's answer on Monday ? Do the Blue Jays have a press conference scheduled for Tuesday ? Should I stop tiring myself out with all of this exercising ... jumping to conclusions. Puff ... puff !
Chuck - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 09:53 PM EST (#177335) #
I doubt that it's really Rob Neyer and Tracy Ringolsby, but rather people claiming to be them.

I'm sure it's all really them. Neither Keith Law nor Rob Neyer are strangers to BTF. Nor, apparently, is the previously anonymous Ringolsby.
ANationalAcrobat - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 10:28 PM EST (#177336) #
Nice idea, gadfly. I read the same thing earlier and considered Toronto a possibility but I did not consider the "blue" part. Doubtful he's making a reference =)

I've mentioned it a couple of times, but I would like to see Fukudome in our outfield if Rios goes. He's a lefty with tremendous on base ability and decent pop. He's only looking for a three or four year contract, which can be risky, but it's not a 6 year deal like Hunter or a 5 year deal like Drew. Wells in Center, Lind/Johnson in LF, Fukudome in RF sounds good to me. Johnson could sub in for Lind against lefties when they start or late in games. Stairs could back them all up as well as 1B and DH.

I really like the idea of having too many players for your positions - it's great to rest players, incites competition, and it covers you when one of them gets hurt. I made a short post about the '06 platoons here.

subculture - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 10:56 PM EST (#177337) #
I really like the idea of having too many players for your positions - it's great to rest players, incites competition, and it covers you when one of them gets hurt. I made a short post about the '06 platoons here.

I completely agree with you, which is why I was not really fond of moves like letting Hinske go (AND paying him), and signing the Big Hurt (nothing against him, but that DH role is perfect for platooning and resting guys like Glaus, Wells, etc).  What's the point of increasing your DH production if you end up losing games at 3b, 1b, etc b/c of nagging injuries..

Put your players in positions where they can excel, and platooning is a great way.  Now, it's easier to say than to actually create that perfect balance but I think the advantages are clear. 





Original Ryan - Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 11:43 PM EST (#177338) #
My feeling on whether Neyer and Law should get ballots is that there needs to be some type of minimum amount of time working in print.

My understanding from that thread is that a writer needs to be a member of the BBWAA for ten years before he or she is eligible to vote for Hall of Fame inductees.  I don't know if there is a similar restriction for voting on the individual awards at the end of the season, but it wouldn't apply to Neyer or Law since neither one covers a specific team and thus wouldn't be allowed to vote anyway.
melondough - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 12:52 AM EST (#177340) #

Sabean says he'll probably decide on Rios for Lincecum within the next couple of days.  He added, "...we want to get on to other business if we're going to pass on this".  Sounds like they're leaning against the trade, and he says he wants to try to get another pitcher to lessen the blow.http://www.mercurynews.com/giantsheadlines/ci_7669450?nclick_check&nclick_check=1

The following link works:

http://www.mercurynews.com/giantsheadlines/ci_7658658?nclick_check=1

Sebean actually said:

"By the end of the weekend, maybe the first of the week, we're going to have to flesh this out one way or the other," Sabean told the station. "We are juggling some other things and we want to get on to other business if we're going to pass on this."....Sabean hinted that he was trying to finagle another pitcher to "lessen the pain" of losing Lincecum.

TamRa - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 01:44 AM EST (#177341) #
If it's just a matter of money, Sabean could throw money at Colon or Freddie Garcia (the most overlooked free agent out there, IMO)

As for Trades, he could send Molina to the Cubs for Prior (apparently available)
Maybe Roberts or Winn to the Rangers for Padilla...there aren't any super duper options outthere but there are some things he could try even with that decripit roster.


TamRa - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 01:48 AM EST (#177342) #
They could get in on Kurda too
Seamus - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 02:11 AM EST (#177344) #
If the Jays do trade Rios, why wouldn't they look into Fukodome?  Supposedly he's an on-base machine, he's left handed, reasonably priced.  Could be a nice pickup. 

It's risky to hope that Lind is going to make a major jump this season as Rios' replacement.  If Rios goes, I'd like to see the Jays think about trading for Bay or looking into someone like Fukodome to replace him.
TamRa - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 02:33 AM EST (#177345) #
there is actually a rumor floating about that there is a "surprise team" in on Fukudome....feel free to speculate...

I think he's a tad expensive BUT a high OBP left handed hitter slotted in at the right place in our lineup would be invaluable.


timpinder - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 08:14 AM EST (#177346) #

I still think it's unlikely that Fukodome is being sought after by the Jays, but I'm starting to think that it might be a possibility.  Ricciardi probably knows by now what his chances are of extending Rios, which might be why he's offering Rios in trades.  Fukodome is a left-handed hitter, which the Jays could use, and Ricciardi loves guys who can get on base.  Rogers wants to make money, and signing a Japanese star could help in that regard.  The salary shouldn't be a big concern with $24 million in Glaus and Burnett likely coming off the books next year (or with Glaus perhaps 2009), and if Rios is moved even more money would be available.  The main reason why I was doubtful about the Jays being interested in Fukodome is that he would block Lind or Snider.  I'm starting to think otherwise.  With Stairs and Johnson in LF in 2008, Lind could stay in AAA and come up in 2009 to play LF, fill in at DH in 2010 and replace Overbay at 1B in 2011.  As an aside, is Lind's major league service clock ticking right now?  Snider might be ready in 2009, but it's just as likely that he splits 2008 between A+ and AA, starts 2009 in AAA and is a September call-up at age 21.

Finally, Blair did write in a recent blog that he had a hunch the Jays had a plan for an outfielder in the event Rios was moved, though the Jays management wouldn't comment.

melondough - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 09:12 AM EST (#177347) #

What am I hearing? Baseball Prospectus'  Joe Sheehan's Friday afternoon "Chat" on the question "Fukodome - Pads, Cubs or Other ?" ...His answer : " Other. I think this one is going to come out of the blue " ... Hmm!  Should I read more than I should into that.

I think Fukudome goes to Dodgers "blue".  However, if the Jays by some miracle sign him it may take changing the name of the Rogers centre to the.....FUKU DOME!

ANationalAcrobat - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 09:27 AM EST (#177348) #
I think Fukudome goes to Dodgers "blue". However, if the Jays by some miracle sign him it may take changing the name of the Rogers centre to the.....FUKU DOME!

M. Kemp, A. Ethier, J. Pierre, A. Jones. Unless they plan on trading one of their youngsters, there just isn't room in the Dodger OF.

AWeb - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 10:49 AM EST (#177349) #
Given they just signed someone to replace Pierre at his only marginally useful position (CF), I don't think it's impossible the Dodgers will just make him a bench player; a defensive replacement and pinch runner mainly. I know teams love veterans over youngsters beyond reason sometimes, but Pierre isn't good offensively, and doesn't have a corner outfield arm. It would be a gutsy move to admit the Pierre contract was such a massive mistake already, but it would be the right one. Even without Fukudome, Pierre isn't one of the best three outfielders they have right now.
moffydream - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 11:11 AM EST (#177350) #

Fukudome is hyped IMO. In average 500AB, H.Matsui hit 40HR in japan, Ichiro hit 20HR, Iguchi hit 24HR, K.Matsui hit 17HR, and Iwamura hit 26HR.

Their power numbers are declined when they comes to MLB. In 500AB, H.Matsui hit 20HR, Ichiro 8HR, Iguchi 14HR, K.Matsui 6HR, and Iwamura 7HR.

Fukudome? he hit 25HR in average 500AB in japan.. You can imagine he'll hit around .290/14HR.

Sure he's lefty with great OBP, good defense but 12M(if the rumor is correct) is too much for 30years old CF/OF.

 

squagles - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 11:43 AM EST (#177352) #
Ichiro and Matsui's 30-33 seasons were pretty valuable, and since he is only looking for a 3 year deal (Apparently.  and I assume the contract will not allow arbitration after that) I don't see age being a reason not go after this guy.
Dave Rutt - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 12:08 PM EST (#177354) #
Parker Brothers has signed with the Rangers. Err, I mean Milton Bradley.
Seamus - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 01:19 PM EST (#177355) #
This is an interesting/funny listen:

http://media.knbr.com/knbr/1206russo.mp3

It's Chris Russo's (from WFAN in New York) take on the possible Rios-Lincecum trade...

Apparently he's a passionate Giants Fan.

John Northey - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 01:32 PM EST (#177356) #
Well, if the Jays trade Rios and find that the Dodgers are not being run by very smart people...
Glaus & Towers (and maybe one of the kids) for Matt Kemp (outfielder who is now on the bench and just 23) and Andy LaRoche (third baseman who will be 24 next season who was left in the minors so Garciaparra could play with his 78 OPS+).

Now, that would be a trade that would haunt the Dodgers for years and make all of us here very, very happy but from what I've been reading the Dodgers might just be that dumb at the moment. If they really think playing Pierre (293/331/353) in LF everyday is a good idea then Kemp would be available and they probably would want a 'proven vet' for third rather than rookie LaRoche (309/399/589 in AAA, lifetime minors is 294/374/524, 75 OPS+ in majors over 115 PA last year).
Bones - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 01:54 PM EST (#177357) #
While I agree the with John that the Dodgers can be taken advantage of, there is NO chance of that trade happening (Glaus and Towers for Kemp and LaRoche).  Absolutely none.  There is no team in the league that is that stupid.  I would do Glaus for LaRoche in a heartbeat, but I doubt that the Dodgers would do that, either.  Even though The Mustache doesn't seem to properly value young players, there are enough smart people in that organization (Logan White, for one) to keep him from doing something quite so stupid.
King Rat - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 01:59 PM EST (#177358) #
Listening to Russo, and reading all of the SF reaction to the proposed trade, it's very hard to imagine the Giants front office weathering an absolute storm of fan criticism to do a deal they're hesitant about already. Which is a pity, 'cause I'd have like the deal to happen. Also, I think the shock and horror about ALEX RIOS is overblown, but I guess I can understand that.

If it does happen, I hope the Dodgers are dumb enough to trade LaRoche for Glaus+, though I think John Northey overestimates the dumbness of the Dodgers' front office-Kemp plus LaRoche would take a king's ransom, I believe. I would, however, like to see a series of trades reshaping the team if they make move one.

ayjackson - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 02:18 PM EST (#177359) #

I think Kemp and Laroche for Glaus and Marcum is possible, as well as Ethier and Laroche for Glaus and Janssen.

I had thoughts that maybe the "plates" that JP is spinning had something to do with the Dodgers asking the Jays to get Lincecum for them, knowing that the Giants wouldn't trade in the division.  Maybe the Dodgers had offered Kemp and Laroche or Elbert for Lincecum, if the Jays could snag him.  Or maybe Ethier, Laroche and Elbert for Lincecum and Glaus.

lexomatic - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 02:36 PM EST (#177360) #
"Fukudome? he hit 25HR in average 500AB in japan.. You can imagine he'll hit around .290/14HR.

Sure he's lefty with great OBP, good defense but 12M(if the rumor is correct) is too much for 30years old CF/OF."

I think 12M is the going rate on useful starting lineup type players. i wouldn't have a problem with that in this market. Especially having good OBP in the leadoff spot. Hitting home runs at leadoff is GREAT, but not the primary responsibility.
Wihle I agree with the statement that HR totals decline in transition from Japan to MLB, but Ichiro isn't necessarily a good comp, because it's always been suggested that he COULD hit for more power, but chooses not to. He's pretty small, so I don't know how many more HR he could hit, but I have no problem seeing him witih 20 HR though only a 300-ish average.
moffydream - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 03:17 PM EST (#177362) #

"I think 12M is the going rate on useful starting lineup type players. i wouldn't have a problem with that in this market. Especially having good OBP in the leadoff spot. "

he's not leadoff-type guy though he'll be one of the fastest guy when Rios goes..

I think he'll post similiar number with Iwamura. Not bad but not worth 12M..

timpinder - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 03:19 PM EST (#177363) #
I was thinking Glaus and Marcum for La Roche and Ethier.  The Dodgers get a legitimate major league starter, but they have to take Glaus and his salary.  Glaus is a risk to them, but if he's healthy he is a big bat.  The Jays get a left-handed RF who could also lead off, and a 3B who gets on base and has some pop, has more speed than Glaus and will be controlled for 6 years.  La Roche and Ethier would be spare parts for the Dodgers, so it seems like a trade could work.  I would LOVE a balanced Jays' lineup like that, a little more speed and another left-handed bat would be perfect.
Grasshopper - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 04:25 PM EST (#177366) #
A balanced lineup. What about our pitching situation. Marcum is our solid #5.
jgadfly - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 04:41 PM EST (#177368) #
What would Glaus and Burnett bring back from the Dodgers as shoe number three dropping?  Where would those two put the Dodgers?  Laroche would definitely be coming Toronto's way.  Plus who?
timpinder - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 06:58 PM EST (#177370) #

Grasshopper,

the 5th spot in the rotation could be filled by Jannsen.  In the event of injury or meltdown, there's Litsch.  In a worst case scenario the Jays could fall back on Towers, Chacin, Banks, and maybe even Purcey or Romero, depending on how they were doing in the minors.  Wolfe has been mentioned as a possible starter, and of course there may even be Clement.  The Jays would be deep enough in starting pitching, if they got Lincecum, to fill in the 5th spot.  I'm not saying I wouldn't want Marcum, but in this totally hypothetical scenerio, it would be worth dealing him to receive Ethier and La Roche.

subculture - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 08:17 PM EST (#177371) #
any updates on Chacin?  I have this crazy feeling that he'll be our very successful #5 pitcher when we next win the World Series ;)



mathesond - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 09:06 PM EST (#177373) #
How 'bout that Eric Gagne landing a $10M deal with the Brewers?
Mick Doherty - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 09:49 PM EST (#177374) #
How 'bout that Eric Gagne landing a $10M deal with the Brewers?

So Doug Melvin continues collecting players with ties to his old organization, the Rangers. Gagne steps in for Coco Cordero again, and joins Claudio Vargas (who was just a spring training guy) and Kevin Mench ... hmm, with Cordero off to Cincy and Laynce Nix released, I guess there aren't as many as I thought!  Surely there are better organizations to be poaching players from, anyway ...

John Northey - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 10:14 PM EST (#177375) #
Heh. Agreed with all who said the Dodgers wouldn't be dumb enough to fall for that one. Now, mix in some minor league pitching, Glaus (since they seem to think they need a ML thirdbaseman not a prospect) and you might have a shot. I could see the Jays doing Lincecum as a flip, thus making it Rios/Glaus (plus an extra prospect or two) for LaRoche/Kemp which would be darn nice and should get JP a raise.

Now, what will happen? Probably nothing although JP is said to be hot and heavy for LaRoche and any GM worth his salt should be trying to steal Kemp from the Dodgers right now.
melondough - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 10:34 PM EST (#177376) #

It appears Toronto is ranked the 5th worst place in America to be a baseball fan in the 21st street.

http://community.foxsports.com/blogs/btk85

Quite frankly I would much rather endure being a fan of the Jays then a fan of K.C, Baltimore, Texas, Tampa, Seattle, Minnesota, or Oakland.  In fact, it's been a pleasure watching them win two world series over the past 15 years.   How many other teams can say that even over the past 25 years?

I can also freely say that I go into most every year with justified hope that the Jays have a chance to make the playoffs.  (unlike the unwarranted hope I have for the Leafs).  The Jays never seem that far off.  It really is not that much different to being a fan of nearly any other AL team, save Anaheim, Boston, and Texas.

Lefty - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 11:08 PM EST (#177377) #

I had thoughts that maybe the "plates" that JP is spinning had something to do with the Dodgers asking the Jays to get Lincecum for them, knowing that the Giants wouldn't trade in the division.  Maybe the Dodgers had offered Kemp and Laroche or Elbert for Lincecum, if the Jays could snag him.  Or maybe Ethier, Laroche and Elbert for Lincecum and Glaus.

I doubt this entirely, if Ricciardi did this he would be seen by the baseball's GM's as undermining a trading partners competitive position and would likely suffer scorn from his peers and apprehension from trading partners in future.

vw_fan17 - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 11:10 PM EST (#177378) #

Quite frankly I would much rather endure being a fan of the Jays then a fan of K.C, Baltimore, Texas, Tampa, Seattle, Minnesota, or Oakland.  In fact, it's been a pleasure watching them win two world series over the past 15 years.   How many other teams can say that even over the past 25 years?

True enough. Oakland feels more like a football town (i.e when the Raiders are going well: we have a baseball team??). At least in my limited experience (I've only visited Oakland a handful of times in my 3 years in the Bay Area). Of course, that may change with the A's moving to Fremont (about 10 minutes from my house!)

I can also freely say that I go into most every year with justified hope that the Jays have a chance to make the playoffs.  (unlike the unwarranted hope I have for the Leafs).  The Jays never seem that far off.  It really is not that much different to being a fan of nearly any other AL team, save Anaheim, Boston, and Texas.

Now, now.. Except for the two most recent seasons, there's been a good stretch of time where there was legitimate hope the Leafs would make the playoffs. Even this year, it's not "insane" to suggest they'll make it. The difference being that over half the league makes the playoffs, and winning one round of playoffs isn't that difficult in the NHL. Then again, I probably have even more unwarranted hope for the Leafs than you do :-)

VW
melondough - Sunday, December 09 2007 @ 11:22 PM EST (#177379) #

The Jays never seem that far off.  It really is not that much different to being a fan of nearly any other AL team, save Anaheim, Boston, and Texas.

Sorry that should have said Anaheim, Boston, and NYY.

How many other teams can say that even over the past 25 years?

Actually I looked it up.  Only the Yankees have WON more than 2 World Series over the past 25 years (actually they won 4).  Other than that, only Toronto, Florida, Minnesota, and Boston that have won more than 1 over the past 25 years (each having won two). 

Taking it one step further, over the past quarter century only 14 teams have merely APPEARED in a World Series multiple times.  They are NYY (6 apperances), St.Louis(4), Oakland(3), Boston(3), Toronto(2), Minnesota(2), Clevland(2), Detroit(2), Atlanta(5), Mets(2), Philadelphia(2), San Fransico(2), San Diego(2), & Florida(2).

So the Blue Jays are one of only seven AL teams that have appeared in the World Series over the past 25 years.  More importantly they are 1 of only 4 AL teams that have won the World Series over that period.  I will say it again, I don't know how it  can be so bad to be a Jays fan.  We have been treated very well and continue to have hope.

Mick Doherty - Monday, December 10 2007 @ 12:05 AM EST (#177380) #
Sorry that should have said Anaheim, Boston, and NYY.

<whew> Glad I hit refresh to see your clarification before posting about the ginormous question mark that formed over my head when I read the original version!  Tom Hicks has a lot of money, but nobody in DFW has figured out how to spend it right yet.

To be fair, LAA doesn't really quite belong in that sentence either. I think BOS and NYY are standalones.
ANationalAcrobat - Monday, December 10 2007 @ 12:18 AM EST (#177381) #
Mick, I understand you follow the Rangers pretty closely. Maybe it's lazy of me to ask, but is there anything actually wrong with Jon Daniels as a GM or are there other issues? I know very little about the club and I'm sort of curious about what has been keeping them from success in recent years. I know, for instance, the Soriano/Wilkerson deal looked good at the time...
VBF - Monday, December 10 2007 @ 10:53 AM EST (#177384) #

It appears Toronto is ranked the 5th worst place in America to be a baseball fan in the 21st street.

Well at least they didn't mention that H word.

Mick Doherty - Monday, December 10 2007 @ 09:03 PM EST (#177414) #
Mick, I understand you follow the Rangers pretty closely.

Honestly, not really. I don't mean to dodge your question, A-N-A, I just  "follow" the Rangers marginally  because I live in the DFW Metroplex and they get all the media coverage, and The Forrt Worth Star-Telegram is a hell of a newspaper (The  Dallas Morning News gets more props nationally, but it's just a tiny cut below in my estimation). So I don't "follow" the team in a way that allows me to answer your question without just completely ripping off Jamey Newberg, the best mostly-amateur baseball writer on the Web. From my perspective, I think the Rangers are only just now getting out of the disaster that was The John Hart Era (or should that be "Error"?) but that's probably oversimplifying ...
ANationalAcrobat - Monday, December 10 2007 @ 10:37 PM EST (#177421) #
Fair enough, Mick. I'll add Newberg to my bookmarks.
Weekend Update | 50 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.