It appears Ty Taubenheim has been claimed off waivers by the Pirates. It was nice knowing you Ty!
The Jays decision to put Taubenheim on waivers hopefully means they have someone in mind to pick in the rule 5 draft. The Jays did have 40 players on their roster, now 39.
Last year was a step-back for Taubenheim, he spent a lot of the year in AA. With the loss of Taubenhiem, Vermilyea and Gronkiewicz the Jays AAA bullpen will have a different look this season.
Gerry,
I was thinking they might be making room for a catcher? They will need to grad Sal Fasano fast before the Yankees and Red Socks sign him.
Why on earth do they have Jean Machi (and who is Jean Machi?) and Joe Inglett on their 40 man? Surely those spots would be more valuable (well at least more interesting anyway) to hold open for the Rule V draft.
According to Blair's latest post, it looks like there is not a lot of discussion with other teams about Burnett yet. His agent says he would be surprised if he is moved - GOOD!
However, contrary to this Blair goes on to say that privately the Jays know that he will opt out and because of this are now beleived to be open to moving him. If that is the case, then I beleive that they need a serviceable pitcher plus a top prospect in return. Texas anyone???
I would think that dropping a player from the 40 man roster now indicates that the Jays have someone in mind. There's no other reason to drop a player right now.
And they certainly don't need to give Fasano anything more than a minor league contract. Of course, they gave Jason Phillips a major league contract last year so who knows.
There's about a half dozen players I would have kept over Taubenheim, particularly minor league relievers. There's always a use for someone that can come up and start.
If anything, it would be nice to see us go after more quality pitching rather than reclamation projects, at this point.
I would love to see the Jays go after Eric Bedard since he's being dangled, but it seems at this point the Orioles are asking too much. Furthermore it seems unlikely he would be dealt to a division rival, although its been done before. We don't seem to be keen on trading Adam Lind, Jeremy Accardo or Shaun Marcum for anything short of God himself at this point.
Rich Harden is one that I am really hoping we are kicking the tires on as well, despite his chronic inability to stay healthy. It would be hard to believe Billy Beane would ask a ton for this guy, since he has been hurt and has shown disdain for the A's medical staff in the past (or maybe that worked itself out). Perhaps they would be interested in a package such as Marcum and Ricky Romero, or even Marcum and Jason Frasor.
For me, it seems the upside of Harden is having another lights out arm in the rotation (barring injury) while staying within the budget. Bedard as well, would not be a significant payroll increase for the Jays.
I would rather spend the wiggle room we have on the budget on a quality arm than a catcher to split time with Zaun. But I'm sure J.P. is four steps ahead of all of us.
As always, if you reference information from another source take another second to throw in the link.
Accroding to WFAN radio in NY, the Mets are closing in on obtaining Bedard....
http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/03/buzz-mets-work-with-os-on-bedard/
If the Jays can land Bedard I would like our chances to compete for the division title (assuming they also hang onto Burnett which I would definately hope they do).
Here's the Blair blog:
http://www.globesports.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20071203.wsptblair3/GSStory/GlobeSportsBaseball/home
Very interesting indeed. Blair is only speculating that a deal for Bedard would center around Burnett because Burnett is from the Baltimore area. But word that the Jays have discussed a deal with the Giants for either Lincecum or Cain is very exciting (I suspect Ricciardi would be more interested in Cain, he's publicly stated he avoided drafting Kazmir because he was concerned that his body wouldn't hold up). I'd like to see the Jays hang on to Rios, but Lind/Wells/Stairs-Johnson could suffice until Snider arrives. I'd much rather see Glaus and Lind go for Cain though. It makes sense since it has been suggested that Glaus would like to return to the Pacific and because Lind doesn't have a position in 2008, and if Snider is ready in 2009 Lind will once again be usurped in the outfield.
The Jays would have to have a 3B replacement in line though. It has been reported on Rotoworld that the Reds are willing to trade Edwin Encarnacion for pitching, and the Jays would have 7 starters.
I just love the winter meetings.
And why would the Jays trade Glaus, even for an excellent young arm? What we need are position players (think SS/C/3B), although I agree that you can never have enough quality pitching. Who would play 3B--Inglett, Santos, Scutaro?
1. Glaus + Lind for Lincecum (assuming Blair's sources are accurate)
2. Romero (or Purcey) + Litsch for Tejada
Tejada could hold down third base for the next two years. Our rotation would consist of Halladay, Burnett, McGowan, Lincecum and Janssen. And our payroll would stay about the same.
It appears JP has been granted some wiggle room with regards to the budget.
Here are a couple excerpts from the Canadian Press:
...the club's payroll is expected to remain around US$90 million for the 2008 season. But with general manager J.P. Ricciardi and the baseball operations staff down in Nashville, Tenn., at the winter meetings looking for ways to improve the club, Godfrey said that figure has room to rise to obtain an impact player. "We do it on a case by case basis. It's got to make sense," Godfrey said in an interview. "J.P. has got to be convinced, he's got to convince me and I've got to convince somebody."
"It's not a lengthy process. We can make quick decisions," said Godfrey. "It could happen at anytime...". Godfrey's absence from Nashville is an indication that the Blue Jays don't expect to get much accomplished at this year's swap meet. If something important was about to happen, he'd be around. "I told J.P., 'If you get something really impressive that requires my presence, I'll get on an airplane and come down,"' said Godfrey.
http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gFsAmtUA3cBvx-DeIcCm3qmp_Dlg
Glaus to LAA for prospects...
Send those prospects plus one or two of our own to Florida to get Miguel Cabrera
Now _that_ would improve the team short and long term. Cabrera has '08 and '09 as arbitration years pre-free agency as I understand it.
Oops, forgot about Marcum. But that's a pretty nice dilemma, isn't it? Marcum or Janssen for the 5th slot in your rotation?
There's talk of the CHW cutting Crede or trading him for very little. That'd do for me.
No one player will jump attendance. Only winning will. In the playoff years the only Canadians were Rob Ducey and Rob Butler, both left handed hitting backup outfielders who had extremely limited playing time. That didn't hurt the attendance of 4 million.
Plus, of course, Jason Bay really isn't amazing (solid, but not really worth what he'd cost) and Bedard isn't worth what the Orioles are asking, nor is Harden.
National Post article titled "Burnett could be traded" Ricciairdi says" just came on line....
"We've just been bouncing around who we're inviting to spring training and just throwing some ideas up against the wall, possible blockbuster trades with some other teams," he said in an lobby interview session. "But we don't have it, just kind of brainstorming.".....That includes teasing other clubs with Toronto's talent to see if a big deal can be made...."I think you throw stuff out there and just see what's available and what teams are willing to do,"
http://www.nationalpost.com/sports/story.html?id=141685
I think we are being teased. As for moving Glaus to the Angles, they already have two 3rd baseman (Wood and Figgins). Now, as I said before if we could get Figgins back :)
I think we are definitely being teased, but at least it's better than sitting around waiting for the ink to dry on Paul Bako's contract.
If they could trade Glaus for Lincecum or Cain they should in a heartbeat.
Perhaps the Jays could package Lincecum/Cain as a centrepiece in a deal for Bedard?
If the Jays could somehow acquire Bedard, I would move Burnett. Perhaps for a third baseman to replace Glaus?
Well I'm not sure what you define as amazing, I'd settle for pretty damn good. Using a salient measurement for hitting such as linear park adjusted batting runs ( as a side note the much quoted OPS + is a poor analytical tool as it improperly captures the value of getting on base) Jason Bay was the fourth best hitter in the N.L. in 2005 and in 2006 he was ninth. During this period he was the top offensive hitting outfielder in the senior circuit, that is what we call performance.
Too many casual fans look only at a players last season which leads to sample size errors, a more cogent analysis looks at a variety of factors including park, injury and history. I think at age 29 this guy may have plenty left in the tank. There's no guarantees in life, but there's a good chance Bay can bounce back to being an elite hitter in a beneficial environment ( the Rogers Centre historically favors right hand power hitters)
The steroid thing? I highly doubt he'll be suspended for something that wasn't even illegal in the MLB at the time.
The Bedard rumors are intruguing as are Mike Wilner's hunch that the Jays could pick up Kenny Lofton to platoon with Reed. If we came out of the winter meetings with Harden/Bedard and Kenny Lofton with a backup catcher thrown in there, even the staunchest of Ricciardi critics (Griffin, Elliott and an growing amount of the Blue Jay fan-base ) would have trouble spinning a negative view of those developments.
This off-season could be a defining moment for JP. With some creative moves, he could get his reputation back on track.
Josh Towers trade rumor:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/weblog/2007/12/padres_moving_toward_trade.html
If Towers is traded I can't imagine it will be for anything of value, but at least the Jays would get something for him.
...
I don't even know what to say.
http://www.globesports.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20071203.wsptblair3/GSStory/GlobeSportsBaseball/home
He also confirms that the Jays dropped Taubenheim to open up room for one or two Rule 5 pickups. They have their eye on a couple of guys.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20071204.JAYS04/TPStory/Sports
If either Lincecum or Cain could be had for a Glaus+Lind package, I think it's a no-brainer. Our depth at 3B after Glaus is pretty much non-existent, but 23-year-old major-league-ready flamethrowers are a rare and valuable commodity. The thought of a Doc-AJ-McGowan-Lincecum/Cain-Marcum rotation next year is drool-worthy. However, for the same reason, I have a feeling that deal is just wishful thinking.
So, if JP is looking to be active in the Rule 5 draft, does anyone have any favourites out there among the available players? One guy I'm a fan is is Jamie D'Antona from the D-Backs. He's 25, plays 3B, 1B and C, and posted a 312/383/487 line in AA in 2006 and a 308/362/499 line in AAA last year.
So, if JP is looking to be active in the Rule 5 draft, does anyone have any favourites out there among the available players? One guy I'm a fan is is Jamie D'Antona from the D-Backs. He's 25, plays 3B, 1B and C, and posted a 312/383/487 line in AA in 2006 and a 308/362/499 line in AAA last year.
Yeah, D'antona and Lubanski look good to me. Lubanski is a top prospect for the Royals who's had two really good looks in AA (albeit in hitters' parks). Hand him a left field platoon role and see if he sticks.
Those crazy scouts!
I don't even know what to say.
I don't understand. He's not a lot of things, but he is a strike-thrower (to a fault) and he is healthy.