Who would be the choice of Bauxites? None of us bet, right?
Who would be the choice of Bauxites? None of us bet, right?
I have no idea who I would bet on, although Tampa at 200-1 does seem pretty decent. But San Francisco at 10-1? It seems pretty likely that their lineup will be even worse than last year's. No way they're better than Boston, who's 15-1.
We all know what happens to Buck's teams after he gets fired.
Of the teams greater than 25:1 I consider these to be value bets (in order):
Padres: 30-1
Indians: 28-1
Rangers: 50-1
Milwaukee: 50-1
Diamondbacks: 50-1
I figure each of those teams have a reasonable shot at the playoffs and if you get that far you have a chance.
There goes Billy Beane buying low again. Shannon Stewart for $2.5, if he reaches incentives. Might be a nice pick-up.
I wonder if Ricciardi had any thoughts of signing Stewart. Probably would have been viewed as a popular move by the average fan and met with derision by the others.
Tampa's inner defence last year was atrocious, making their pitching look much worse than it was. They're talking about moving Cantu off second base, and that will really help the pitching staff. Iwamura is going to be a huge upgrade in this department.
Yanks at 7/2 BUNK!
I'm predicting it here and now, both the Sox FOR SURE and the Jays HOPEFULLY FOR SURE are gonna finish ahead of the dreaded Spankies. There, there, now I feel better.
Even looking at cleveland at 28/1 (now down to 20/1, possibly because of this thread although no Canadian's allowed on Bodog) if they make the playoffs there is close to a 1/8 chance they win on average. That means you think that Cleveland makes the playoffs 1 in every 2.5 (for 20/1) or 3.5 (for 28/1) times. But what of Detroit, Minnesota, or CWS? In fact if you look at Cleveland's chance to win the division you see it at 4/1 (fourth best) but surprisingly its chance to win the AL pennant is 15/1 (while the WS is 20/1, does the AL dominate the NL that much in a best of 7?).
Looking at it per division is interesting as you can see the probability that the AL East has an implied 40.0% chance of winning the WS, AL Central an implied 37.0% chance, NL Central 27.8%, NL East 22.9%, NL West 20.1%, and AL West 17.3%. My guess in that list is the NL Central's chances are inflated because of six teams in the division while the AL West is deflated because of only four teams because each team is probably getting a buffer added to the probabilities. But you can see that with 6 divisions, even if each division "only" had the AL West implied chance that would still be ~1.038 world series winners next year.
The only real way to do even OK at these type of bets is to compare multiple sites and be able to pick and choose the best line from multiple sites to try and overcome the massive vig. Er, not that my advice should be considered professional gambling advice or anything.
Off topic here but I thought this was hilarious.
Wrestling promotion NWA-TNA has a pay-per-view this weekend coming and one of the featured matches is between the team of A.J Pierzynski (yes, that AJP) with current Sox coach and former pro wrestler Dale Torberg against the team of Johnny Damon and TNA wrestler Lance Hoyt. Pierzynski and Torberg have appeared on many TNA shows (seen on SpikeTV) with Pierzynski nailing Hoyt numerous times with steel chairs.
Am I the only one hoping Damon gets actually knocked out with a steel chair?