Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Ken Rosenthal reports that the Blue Jays have signed Royce Clayton to a 1 year, $1.5 million deal. The deal is pending a physical (and Clayton not switching agents at the last minute).


The 37 year old journeyman SS joins his 7th team since 2002.  While Clayton is not the player he used to be he does have a few things going for him:
  • He's durable, averaging about 140 games the past 4 seasons.
  • He's an upgrade over the production the Jays got out of Macdonald/Adams/Alfonso/Figueroa/Roberts last year
  • He allows Aaron Hill to remain at second base
  • The contract is for one year and minimal money
The downside to the deal:
  • He's not a very good hitter - an OPS+ of 66 in 2006
  • He's not a very good fielder
Jordan summarized things pretty well earlier today:
In his youth with the Giants and Cardinals, Clayton could pick it -- he was a standout defensive shortstop and an aggressive (though not very successful) base-stealer. But as his 30s have progressed, he's lost a step or two -- his RF and FP have been declining to league-average or lower levels for years now, and Defensive Win Shares placed him well-below average among NL shortstops last year. He hits a pretty empty .260 and his speed has eroded.

In short, he's a true stopgap measure -- he could be had for about $1M a season, and I doubt he'd get more than that from the Jays. If JP does indeed have about $11M left to spend, and he wants to either bring back Lilly or sign Meche, then that's going to cost him most of that, so $1M for a shortstop seems about right. I'd love to have Lugo, but at this point, it looks like a pretty simple choice: Lugo or Lilly/Meche. As much as I think that a Lugo-Hill middle-infield combo would do wonders for the entire pitching staff, I can't countenance the thought of, say, Chacin, Marcum and Towers starting 60% of Toronto's games in 2007. Lilly/Clayton or Towers/Lugo? It's not really much of a choice. At least Aaron Hill won't be playing out of position.


I can't say that I'm too fired up about the deal.  But the commitment and money are both small enough that if a better alternative comes up - even this off season - the Jays could make a move without hesitation.  I would have liked to see the Jays explore the trade market a little bit more before committing to Clayton, but we obviously have no idea who's being offered and what the asking price is.  Bill Hall would be great, for example, but a 27 year old SS who hit 35 HRs isn't going to come cheap. 

Ricciardi seems to like getting his business done early and this year is no different.  The Jays priority this offseason was another hitter, a catcher, a middle infielder and a starter.  The first three are off of the list now and the Jays - at least internally - know what they can offer to the starter they want to sign as they head towards the winter meetings next week.

Blue Jays Sign Royce Clayton | 173 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
PhilBlunt - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:07 PM EST (#159380) #

I'm going to reserve judgement until the pitching gets sorted out because if this enables JP to get some pitching I'll be okay with it.  However you can color unimpressed with Clayton.  It just seems so unimaginative.  Any old GM can sign a veteran like Clayton, where's the vision.  Oh well, it's not a whole lot of money I guess.  OPS+ of 66 is awful and was just terrible after going to the Reds. 

 

King Ryan - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:10 PM EST (#159383) #
Ugh.

So we dodge a bullet with Barajas and now the Jays go out and sign Clayton?  I wish JP really was the stat-head GM he's criticized for being.  Why not just go with Adams/McDonald and save yourself the $1,000,000? I do not understand.   Clayton should not be expected to produce more than either of them next year. Hopefully he doesn't think that Clayton's a good fielder just because of his reputation (like he did with Molina.)
Newton - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:17 PM EST (#159387) #

I'd rather spend the dough on an impact middle infielder than on any of Lilly, Padilla, Meche.  Meche is a disaster waiting to happen for the club who pays him 10 mill a year.  At least Lilly/Padilla have proven they can pitch in tough environments.

The value in this market appears to be at middle infield. 

Sure wish we'd have dealt McGowan intstead of Bush for Overbay  last season...

The prudence of the Frank Thomas signing needs to be re-visited if we only have 90 million to spend this year.  

Craig B - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:18 PM EST (#159388) #
Clayton's a type C, so at least it doesn't cost a draft pick.  This is a good depth move but I hope it means that Russ Adams gets at least a full shot at the shortstop job, rather than just handing it over to Clayton.
Ryan Day - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:20 PM EST (#159389) #
  Well, it's hardly an impact move.

  But Clayton is cheap, cheap enough that he can always be dumped if he really flops. I'm not sure this isn't a worse idea than paying $4-5 million for a Kennedy or Loretta, or $8 million for Lugo or Durham, as well as aking a long-term commitment.

  And if this gives J.P. a couple more million to spend on pitching, that's a good thing. And I'm perhaps one of the few people who still believes that Russ Adams can make a comeback; by the All-Star break, we may be seeing Hill at short and Adams at 2nd.

  On his own, signing Clayton is a neutral move. We'll have to see what comes next. It is clear that J.P. wants to get all the little parts of the team together before he moves on to the big game: He's obviously going after pitching now, unless something weird happens.
CeeBee - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:21 PM EST (#159390) #
I will wait and see what else transpires before I jump on or off the ship. Since the money was relatively small by today's standards I can't see this really hurting the Jays unless Clayton sucks even worse than the Jays shortstops last year and Gibbons has a man-crush on him and he still plays 140 games.
deep dish - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:22 PM EST (#159391) #

I don't mind this signing, because I think it means at minimum we have a boring, dependable, shortstop and  Russ Adams will get another chance to be a regular in the big leagues.

I didn't think the Lugo deal was very realistic, lest we forget that Russ is a former first rounder.   Adams had a decent 2004, and I thought his defence was improving hopefully he can forgot 2005 and make a comeback.  I don't think .260/15/60 and average defence is out of the question for Russ Adams, I can't figure out why he seemed so lost last year.  I'd say there is a decent chance Russ could be this years' Alex Rios and I am glad we don't have Lugo, Kennedy or some other expensive-but-low-ceiling player blocking him.

I like this move, and I think as Jays' fans we have to look at Adams rather than Clayton's potential for next year.   JP bought Clayton as insurance.

 

Craig B - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:23 PM EST (#159392) #

Since it just about guarantees we'll never have to see an Edgardo Alfonzo in the infield next year, it does make me feel better.  That being said, there's a nonzero chance that Clayton could crater like Alfonzo.

Ron - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:25 PM EST (#159393) #

Somewhere out there Russ Adams has to be asking himself what has gone wrong in the past year. If this Clayton signing isn’t an indication Adams is buried in the doghouse, I don’t know what is. Clayton is coming off a season hitting .258/.307/.341 and McDonald is coming off a .223/.271/.308 season. Both players aren’t going to win a Gold Glove and aren’t young either.

I have no problem with Clayton as the utility man, but he’s a complete sinkhole in the batting order as a full time player. I find it extremely hard to believe there wasn’t a better option out there whether it was through free agency or a trade that would still fit within the Jays budget.

I surely hope this signing isn’t a consequence of paying big dollars to Frank Thomas or perhaps Gil Meche. A big thumbs down from my perch.

Mike Forbes - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:30 PM EST (#159395) #
I was a big fan of Clayton back in the late 90's, but his career is winding down to the end now. The biggest upside we as fans can hope for is that he grows those long dreadlocks again, every team needs a weird hair style on the roster... Except the Yankees.
Mike Green - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:37 PM EST (#159398) #
I don't consider this signing confirmed.  Rosenthal had Thomas at $23 million for 2 years, a day before he signed for $18 million. We have had the Barajas drama, and I'm not buying until Jeff Blair says it's so.

Royce Clayton is a less productive player than John McDonald. He's a below average fielding shortstop and an absolutely anemic bat.  And at his age, he's not going to get better. If he does sign, the best case scenario is that Clayton replaces McDonald.  The worst case scenario is that he is the everyday shortstop to start the season.
Chuck - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:45 PM EST (#159401) #

I don't consider this signing confirmed. 

Can we get two 11:59 PM reprieves from the governor in the same week?

Jordan - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:48 PM EST (#159402) #
Good point, Mike. Don't mean nothin' till they sign it on the dotted line....

The thing about signing Clayton is that it doesn't preclude another move to solidify shortstop next year, or even at the All-Star Break. Signing Adam Kennedy, for instance, locks you in for at least three seasons to an infield solution that may not be optimal; signing Clayton is a low-risk move that you can upgrade whenever the opportunity presents itself (and gives you a GG-calibre 2B at the same time).

I like the idea of Adams and Clayton competing for the shortstop job; unlike John McDonald, Clayton has been an everyday player and can accordingly push Adams harder in the effort to recover his game (which you have to figure would be, from the Jays' perspective, the optimal outcome). Clayton won't win them any ballgames when he starts, but he shouldn't lose them any either. But nor would I like to see him starting 120 games for this club next season.

I would've preferred Julio Lugo too; but one of the things about not being the Red Sox or Yankees is that you can't fill every position with the players that you want.

This item on the Barajas fallout includes a curious feature at the end: while noting that the Jays are actively courting Meche, it also quotes Ricciardi as saying that the team wants to bring back Lilly. Now, I had been proceeding on the assumption that the club has about $10M to spend, which in this market buys you (a) Lugo, (b) Lilly, or (c) Meche. I still think that's the likeliest scenario. But you could interpret this to mean that the Jays think they can sign both Lilly and Meche, and presumably that's why they signed a fill-in shortstop in Clayton, to maximize their dollars. But we don't really know the available resources, and we won't know until this whole thing shakes out.

Paul D - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:49 PM EST (#159403) #
Could Clayton and Adams platoon, Clayton against Left Handers, Russ versus right handers?
Jordan - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 08:51 PM EST (#159404) #
Looking at that again after posting it, I realize, of course, that the Jays will actively court both players till one of them signs. Disregard my last paragraph.
King Ryan - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 09:02 PM EST (#159407) #
How much would he make this year? If it's near half of Clayton, then isn't this worth it?

Why would it be? All things considered, I see no appreciable upgrade from McDonald to Clayton.   If the Blue Jays really wanted to cheap out on an SS and "maximize their dollars," then keeping McDonald would seem like the more obvious solution. 

We're talking about paying 1,500,000 for a 37 year old below-average SS who should be good for about a 63 OPS+ next year, versus spending 650,000 on a 32 year old above-average SS who should be good for about a 58 OPS+ next year. What the hell was the point?  And if JP is planning on keeping both of them ... oi.
Mike Green - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 09:09 PM EST (#159409) #
Not to mention that McDonald is a couple of runs above average with the glove per year over the last 2, while Clayton is seven runs below.  Why on earth would you want two of these guys around? One is the very maximum that I can imagine. 

As for the 11:59 pardon from the governor, in the immortal words of Spike Lee, "please, baby, baby, baby, please, baby, baby".
smcs - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 09:17 PM EST (#159410) #
For some reason, this signing reminds me a lot of the Mike Bordick signing of 2003.  They have almost similar AVG/OBP/SLG lines, with Royce lower in OBP and higher in SLG by the same margin.  Royce has more strikeouts and less walks,  he steals more bases, but gets caught more often. Clayton has more hits, doubles and triples, but the equal HRs.  Their fielding is about the same, Bordick's was a bit better, especially the season before he became a Jay, compared to Clayton last year.  They were both 37 when they signed with the Jays.  Hill is the same age now as Hudson was in '03.

Bordick's line with the Jays? .274/.340/.382 with 5 HRs and 54 RBIs in 102 games.  He offered above-average defence, although he had almost always been above-average, whereas Clayton was below-average last year. 

This isn't the end for Russ Adams, he will still have a chance to impress in Spring Training.  I think Clayton is just holding the spot for Russ or maybe for Sergio Santos

Matthew E - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 09:19 PM EST (#159411) #
I believe Robert B. Parker's immortal character Hawk said it best when he said,

"Well, it's better than screaming for help, I guess."

Look at it this way. He's being paid little enough that a) if Adams can play, he can brush Clayton aside with no special problem, and b) if Clayton really, really can't play, the Jays will just fingerflick him out of there.

And let's not forget: the ability to pick up cheap shortstop help, and get a surprising amount of production out of them, has been one of Ricciardi's uncanny knacks since he took over. Berg, Gomez, Bordick and McDonald all played a lot better than I expected them to when they joined the team. If it happens again, I won't be shocked.

Craig B - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 09:22 PM EST (#159412) #

You can't put four middle infielders on a team carrying 12 pitchers, so Adams would be the odd man out if both McDonald and Clayton made the team.

Flex - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 09:30 PM EST (#159415) #
As much as I dislike bringing in Clayton, let's not discount the possibility that he would only be the starting SS until July 31. If the Jays are deep in the hunt for a playoff spot, I suspect this would be the area that Ricciardi would target in an attempt to make an impact trade at the deadline. I can't imagine he'd want to go into the playoffs with a shaky 37 year old SS.
Jonny German - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 09:39 PM EST (#159417) #
Surprising stat: Clayton has an OBP over .360 versus lefties each of the last 3 years.
Mike Green - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 09:47 PM EST (#159419) #
His platoon differential over his career is entirely normal though.
Leko - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 10:06 PM EST (#159421) #

From Rosenthal:

"Clayton no longer is an elite defender, and his weaknesses could be highlighted playing on artificial turf at SkyDome. He still makes the routine plays, but had the third-lowest zone rating among the 15 qualifying National League shortstops last season."

The Thomas signing decreases the need to improve the offense coming from SS.  I understand avoiding Lugo, but why even make the move to Clayton?  His defence is weaker than Mcdonald and his bat is only marginally better.  My guess is that Mcdonald will be the starting SS sooner rather than later.

Perhaps this move is just a PR one?  After talking about improving the middle-infield, maybe they decided that making a nominal move was required for PR if they have concluded that Mcdonald/Adams is the way they wanted to go after losing out on Kennedy?

At least at 1 year/$1.5 million, they can afford to have this signing be a complete flop.

fozzy - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 10:12 PM EST (#159422) #
Not to nitpick, but this is the second time this off-season that Rosenthal has mentioned "the hard turf at Skydome;" the first time he commented on the Frank Thomas signing, and how it might affect his ankle. Weird.
Ryan C - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 10:15 PM EST (#159424) #
His platoon differential over his career is entirely normal though.

Could it be that he just got better at it as he got older?  He was nothing special early in his career as far as facing lefties goes but more recently, 5 of the past 6 seasons, he seems to have done fairly consistantly well against them.  He's put up OBP of .348/.366/.361/.365 the last four years versus lefties in about 600 plate appearances.  Stastical anomaly or learned skill?
John Northey - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 10:30 PM EST (#159428) #
So, we now have Royce Clayton here.  What did we get?  He doesn't look like much so lets see his comparables...

Who is on the list at age 36....
Dave Concepcion, Leo Cardenas, Omar Vizquel, Roger Peckinpaugh, Tony Fernandez, Frank White, Rabbit Maranville, Pee Wee Reese, Chris Speier, Bill Russell.

Hmm.  Nice group to be mixed in with.  Some hall of the very good players and a pair of HOF'ers

What did the group do on average for the rest of their careers?  261/327/341OPS+77 which fits nicely with Clayton's career line of 258/313/368 OPS+ 76. 

In order of similar score... at 37...
Concepcion - 319/377/384 - OPS+100 - dead cat bounce as he hit sub-200 the next season then retired
Cardenas - retired (1975 at age of 36)
Vizquel - 291/353/388 - OPS+95 followed by two more solid seasons and is still active
Peckinpaugh - retired (1927 at age of 36)
Fernandez - 328/427/449 OPS+124 then in Japan for a year (very weird eh?)
White - 235/266/330 OPS+66 ugh, worst season since he was 23
Maranville - 284/344/366 OPS+79 then played 5 more seasons - pretty good for the 1930's
Reese - 257/322/344 OPS+74 then really sucked in the last year for Brooklyn before 1 year in LA and retirement
Speier - 249/342/394 OPS+99 last year as a semi-regular (300+AB's) then 2 solid backup years
Russell - 250/302/301 OPS+73 and that was it

So quite a few guys with solid seasons, one spectacular one, and 2 that were poor but not horrid and one horrid one.  Not too bad odds really.  Much better than Zaun's odds. 

This catches me as a safe signing, not so much that he can't be released mid-season, costs only cash not prospects, can be shifted to a backup role if a really good shortstop (or second baseman) falls into the Jays laps.
Chuck - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 10:35 PM EST (#159431) #

Not to nitpick, but this is the second time this off-season that Rosenthal has mentioned "the hard turf at Skydome;" the first time he commented on the Frank Thomas signing, and how it might affect his ankle. Weird.

Ken Rosenthal is worth reading when he's talking about player movement since he seems to legitimately be in the know. But when he foists his analysis upon the masses... shudder. He's just another generic BBWAAer.

AWeb - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 10:49 PM EST (#159432) #
If the plan is to platoon Adams and Clayton, gettting a ~.700 OPS SS out of it, then this deal almost makes sense. But that would ignore the bad defense from both of them.  Terrible, just terrible, is my reaction. Awful. Royce Clayton? He of the career best 94 OPS+, hopefully near 70 next year, if the Jays are lucky? The same guy who has played for 9 teams, and been replaced by: Rich Aurillia (SFG), Luis Ordaz (STL, during 1998 season, Renteria the next year), Alex Rodriguez (TEX, OK, that brings hope), Jose Valentin (CHW), Craig Counsell (MIL), Clint Barmes (COL), Craig Counsell again (ARI) and Felipe Lopez (CIN)?

Surely, somewhere in the major leagues, there exists a minor league shortstop who is stuck behind a better player, who could be gotten for a decent pitching prospect. Lots of suggestions have been made here about Wells trades trying to get a great one, but the Jays could have made a huge improvement at SS just by getting a decent SS.  Trade a decent pitching prospect for a decent SS prospect, and give him a try (and yes, I realize it's not that easy, but signing Clayton sure is...who else would want him exactly?). Reliable crap isn't worth the reliability. Clayton may end up being one of the worst ten hitters of all time.He's been that bad....

If Clayton plays a significant, helpful role for the Jays this year, I'll be shocked and thrilled, but what are the chances? He might be an improvement over Adams/McDonald. So would any other SS in the majors, and many in the minors. Sorry to repeat myself, but the disgust has been building...

Not that I see it expressed much here, but anyone who thinks JP is a "moneyball" or "stats" guy after this signing (and the near Barajas signing) has just stopped paying attention.
Rickster - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 10:50 PM EST (#159433) #

I have no problem with this deal. He will be a stop-gap at best, and gives Russ Adams one last shot at making it.  Russ did hit 314/374/404 at Syracuse last year and may still make it as a serviceable (and cheap) major league shortstop. He's still only 25.

The main reason I support it, however, is the fact that it is a one year deal. JP came in with the mandate of building a team that would compete every year and be sustainable. Signing a one year deal with Clayton not only frees up money this year, it frees up money for next. JP obviously looked around for an SS this off-season and decided none of the candidates were worth the money and the years they were going to get. I would personally rather have Clayton for a year at $1.5M than Alex Gonzalez for 3 years at $18M.

The only thing left is a pitcher. I think the chances are great of getting one of the 'top' guys - here's hoping for Padilla or (gulp) Lilly.

6-4-3 - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 10:54 PM EST (#159434) #

What did the group do on average for the rest of their careers?  261/327/341OPS+77 which fits nicely with Clayton's career line of 258/313/368 OPS+ 76

That's totally unfair, though.  Those guys played in a lesser offensive era, as their average OPS+ of 88 shows.  They might've done that, but if the comps were based on adjusted stats, Clayton's comps would look worse, and so would their post age 36 lines.

Jordan - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 11:05 PM EST (#159437) #
Like Craig, I don't see any reason to have four middle infielders on the club (they still don't have a reliable backup for Overbay or Glaus, by the way). If they really are going to re-sign McDonald, then I have to assume Russ Adams will be traded, because he's not going to do anyone any good in Syracuse.

I can understand keeping one veteran infielder who can't hit; I can't understand keeping two. Clayton and Adams at shortstop to start the year makes sense to me; Clayton and McDonald on the same team is amateurish roster management.

In the MLB story, Ricciardi refers to Clayton as a "veteran presence." That translates nicely to "useless late-30s guy," and I really hoped I'd never hear my team's GM use it to describe a free-agent signing.

Just to tweak Geoff Baker, wherever he is, the Jays have now tripled their African-American player contingent this off-season.
Jordan - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 11:07 PM EST (#159438) #
in what a source said will be a determined attempt to sign both his own free-agent, Ted Lilly, and Gil Meche.

Looks like I shouldn't have second-guessed myself earlier.
greenfrog - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 11:09 PM EST (#159439) #
Clayton. Harumph.

That is all.

HollywoodHartman - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 11:15 PM EST (#159442) #
Clayton + Lilly/Meche = Bad.
Clayton + Lilly + Meche = Good.

The_Game - Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 11:23 PM EST (#159447) #

If the Jays are able to sign both Lilly and Meche as a result of making this deal, will some of you like this deal then?

I personally think it's fine. It allows Hill to play a position where he plays a great, gold-glove calibur defense, and also allows them to target the 2 starting pitchers they want. Clayton is also a fairly large offensive upgrade on John McDonald, whether you want to admit it or not. He would obviously be more effective agaisnt only lefties, but just like last year with Bengie Molina, that doesn't appear to be an option, so why worry about it? And judging by the other SS signings so far...this deal is actually a bargain. Counsell, a comparable player to Clayton, signed today for a 2 year/6M deal. And Cora recently signed a 2 year/4M deal with the Red Sox, just to be their backup. It's seriously not as bad a deal as some of you are making it out to be. I'm fine with it. The Jays Opening Day lineup will still be far better than it was last year.

Ryan Day - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:08 AM EST (#159454) #
J.P. got pretty lucky the last time he signed a 36 year-old shortstop with a reputation as a glove man and not much of a bat. Granted, Mike Bordick was both a better hitter and a better defender, but might lighting strike twice?

(Probably not. I'm just putting it out there.)
melondough - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:09 AM EST (#159456) #

I don't mean to put a downer on this "giddy" scenario, but I don't think the Cubs or the Mets (or LAD or SF for that matter) are going to make it that easy for JP to sign both Meche and Lilly.  Once JP signs one, he better have the other on the other line because the remaining FA will have his price increase again (if given a choice who should JP sign first?). 

I also want to say to all those Meche doubters that as far as I know, no one here is paid to be a scout of proffessional ball.  Those that are paid obviously see something in Meche (i.e. Cubs and Yankees).  Otherwise he would not have so many suitors.

actionjackson - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:32 AM EST (#159458) #
We will know the market has truly gone nuts if Meche gets 4/$40 mil. 3/$24 mil would be reasonable, but please JP get out of the bidding if it goes to a fourth year for him. Go hard after Lilly though. It sounds like JP wants no part of Padilla, but you never know. Meche is only palatable as a #4, with Lilly or maybe Padilla at #3. I'd give Lilly a 5th year, before giving Meche a 4th year, Padilla not over 4.
robertdudek - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:37 AM EST (#159460) #
At this point in his career, I don't think Royce Clayton can outperform John McDonald. Waste of money.


JustinD - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:43 AM EST (#159461) #
<i> Those that are paid obviously see something in Meche (i.e. Cubs and Yankees). </i>

When have the Yankees ever made a mistake on evaluating picthing talent the last few years? Pavano, Wright and Randy Johnson all worked out very well for them...

I'd be happy with Meche though, the price obviously worries me. Who knows though, maybe in two years his salary will look like a steal for a back end starter and we could deal him for something...
Thomas - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:45 AM EST (#159462) #
I also want to say to all those Meche doubters that as far as I know, no one here is paid to be a scout of proffessional ball.  Those that are paid obviously see something in Meche (i.e. Cubs and Yankees).  Otherwise he would not have so many suitors.

Good logic. The extension of this point means that no transaction in professional baseball should be criticized, because men who are paid to evaluate baseball talent have made the decision and we are not paid to scout baseball, so our opinions are less meaningful. I just hope you never criticized any move JP has made in his career, nor any move John Gibbons' made when managing a ballgame, etc...etc...

Anyhow, I'm also a Meche doubter, although maybe I've been reading too much USS Mariner. It's a great blog, but it's not like they've never been wrong before (as we all have). If there exists this much money in the budget, I'd also prefer taking a shot at Lugo and Lilly and letting the back end of the rotation sort itself out. However, I think it's very possible JP strongly suspects Lugo will go elsewhere, such as to Boston, and feels he has a good shot at landing Lilly or Meche, or perhaps both. He would also have to feel Meche is worth a $7-10 million a year contract for four years, which perhaps he does based on his potential, in combination with groundball and line drive rates from last year. Again, I'd probably prioritize Lugo above Lilly, who are both above Meche, but maybe JP feels that may leave the Jays empty-handed.

Signing both of them would allow the Jays to shop pitching, which would be interesting. A number of Bauxites advocated trading Chacin after 2005, but the Jays decided to hang onto him. After 2006 his value has certainly decreased, but a pre-arbitration starter who has the possibilty of putting up 200 league-average innings will attract attention. Alternatively, JP could look to deal one or more of Marcum, Janssen, McGowan and Taubenheim, although I think Chacin would be the first one shopped. He could perhaps use a pitcher to upgrade the SS position.  I'm curious to see what he'd be able to do with a surplus of servicable pitching.
Thomas - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 01:07 AM EST (#159465) #
Just to tweak Geoff Baker, wherever he is, the Jays have now tripled their African-American player contingent this off-season.

True. However, equally damning is the fact that the Jays were set to sign a Hispanic catcher and then suddenly "the catcher and his agent"  backed out of the deal in strange circumstances and was replaced, surprisingly quickly, by, lo and behold, a white catcher. Very suspicious.

Also, one could argue JP let Thomas slide because he's in an interracial marriage. The "Toronto Blue Jays Wives and Girlfriends Club" is still very white. Suspiciously white, in fact. I have a good mind to request a front-page story on this development.

FYI, Baker's now the baseball columnist for one of the Seattle papers. He wrote that piece on Hernandez that was linked on BTF a few days ago.
Jacko - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 01:20 AM EST (#159467) #
You know, lost in all this talk about Meche and Lilly is the fact that JP read the market perfectly last year and managed to ink Burnett and B.J. Ryan to (in retrospect) modest contracts.   People are talking about signing Lilly to a 4/40 contract with a straight face.   Makes AJ's 5/55 deal and BJ's 5/47 deals seem positively reasonable.

AJ's opt out clause after 2008 is a bit of a fly in the ointment.  The figures and contract length are eerily similar to JD Drew's contract with the Dodgers, and it sounds like he's in line for a raise from 11 MM to 14-15 MM per season once the dust settles.  I guess if AJ absolutely loves it here after 2007-2008 they jays might be able to sign him to a contract extension, but I'm guessing that barring any serious injuries or performance problems, he's as good as gone in 2009.  Points to AJ's agent for getting his client both security and flexibility.
China fan - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 05:13 AM EST (#159468) #

     Both the Globe and the Star today are confirming that JP is striving to sign BOTH of Lilly and Meche -- not just one of the two.  There's no guarantee it will happen -- JP admits to the Star that signing both of them is an "extreme wish" -- but JP wouldn't be confirming this target unless he is pretty certain that his budget will allow him to spend at least $17-million or $18-million on free-agent pitchers, or maybe even more, and that's good news.   So I see two scenarios here:

    1) he signs both Lilly and Meche, which would be ideal.  There might be questions about Meche, but he would work well in the 4th spot in the rotation, and Chacin would be good in the 5th spot.   Marcum becomes the spot starter in the bullpen, which is a good slot for him.  This also makes the Royce Clayton signing look a bit better.

    2) he signs Lilly or Meche but not both.  This would still leave him with $7-million or $8-million to spend on another pitcher, who might not be ideal but might still be an adequate 4th starter.  Padilla?  Armas?  Mulder?  (Maybe a good poll question.)

    Anyway, the good news here is that JP has more money for pitching than we first realized.  He couldn't possibly be targeting both Lilly and Meche unless he was sure of having a good chunk of change.

Mark - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 07:42 AM EST (#159470) #
I am trying to find some spin to make this signing look good but I am not having any success. I guess the reality is we don't have the means to spend like the Sox or Yanks and signings like this must exist.

That is what I accepted until I heard they were going after both Meche and Lilly. I would much rather have a combination of Lilly/Lugo/Marcum over Lilly/Clayton/Meche. I think the drop of from Lugo to Clayton is much bigger than the drop off from Meche to whoever sticks of Marcum/Janssen/McGowan/Banks/Towers/Rosario/Downs.

This off season really exposes the terrible job JP has done with the draft. His first five 1st rounders were SS, SS, SP, SP, SP and it so happens the two positions we need right now are a SS and SP
unclejim - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 07:53 AM EST (#159471) #
Slightly unfair there with the slur on JP's drafting.

You can't really expect the players drafted in the last 2 years to be ready to take serious rotation spots yet...  it would be nice to live in a world where a draft from one year could be an all star the following June, but .. well...  Of the picks that should by now be contributing,  Aaron Hill could quite easily be the SS but has been moved to 2B, so that picks a success.  Adams at the moment looks like a bust, its true, but otherwise I think his first round success has been ok.. Not great, I'm not pretending we've got the 2nd coming of Cy Young in the minors, but his drafts have been ok. 

I also suspect if you examine the success of 1st round picks from all other teams (relative to drafting position) you'll see the results probably show JP in the the middle of the bunch when it comes to success.  (Anyone want to do that research  ;)   )

timpinder - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 08:19 AM EST (#159472) #

I can certainly see Adams contributing next year, but I can't see him playing SS again on a regular basis.  He's showed that his arm is just too weak and inaccurate for that position.  If he hits .325 / .375 in AAA with good defense at 2B, maybe he comes up to play 2B later in the year with Hill shifting to SS, and Clayton becoming a utility guy.  Otherwise the Jays may have to make a trade for a SS prospect.

As for signing starting pitching, I know a lot of people want to see the Jays win this year, but what about the next few years as well?  Why on earth would a smart GM overpay and handcuff the future budget to lock up one or two mediocre pitchers because starting pitching happens to be in short supply this year.  It doesn't make sense to me and if it happens, J.P. will have been incredibly short-sighted in my opinion.  Go for Lilly and Lilly alone, and if you can't get him, trade Wells for a starting pitcher, or wait until next year and take your pick:  Affeldt, Buerhle, D. Davis, R. Johnson, Rusch, Rogers, Benson, Byrd, Carpenter, Clement, Colon, Garcia, L. Hernandez, Jennings, Leiber, Miller, Pineiro, Schilling, Silva, Smoltz, Westbrook, Wright, C. Zambrano, V. Zambrano, among others.  Please don't sign Gil Meche J.P., unless it's somehow a one-year 'stop-gap' measure.

Wildrose - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 08:25 AM EST (#159473) #
It wouldn't surprise me when the smoke all clears,  this time next week after the winter meetings, that Clayton is back in more of a utility role, as part of a "three headed monster" infield.

The game of musical chairs at second base has not finished yet. Four Type A free agents are still out there, Durham, Graffanino, Loretta and Belliard. With the Clayton move, only one team the Padres, are still in the market for this position.

Do they all get offered arbitration? A certain amount of liars poker is perhaps being played here.    Given the current lack of suitors, a guy like Durham, may be better off accepting arbitration, returning to the Giants.  Given his great year, and the overall market , no arbitrator would dare cut his salary. Do the Giants really want him back at $8-9 million a year, when they have a young prospect, Fransden ready for the position?

Do the Brewers want Graffanino back, with Counsell just signed? Somebody has to blink, and when the music stops playing, one or more of the available free agent second basemen, may be had, cheaply. 

Wildrose - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 08:44 AM EST (#159474) #
Put me down in the group that would prefer Lugo over Meche or Lilly.  Given this time of year though, wishing and getting are two separate things. My boys want Play Station 3  for Christmas,  fat chance, ain't happening.

Frankly, wishing for Lugo for Christmas is the same thing. The Jays cannot possibly win a bidding war with the likes of the Red Sox for this player, ain't happening. So you need to adjust your expectations. The irony is that not many teams are in the market for  a shortstop, so yes when he signs, it'll be for cheaper than most would've thought . When a team is willing to bid   $20 million year and up, for a relatively unproven  pitching commodity   from Japan, you can't outbid that same team for a shortstop it needs  perhaps even more.

Mike Green - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 09:09 AM EST (#159476) #
At the start of the off-season, if one had decided that Russ Adams was not going to be the starting shortstop in 2007 (and that decision is something that reasonable people might differ on), there were two free agent possibilities to upgrade the position significantly, Julio Lugo and Alex Gonzalez.  They had different values, price tags and markets. 

Starting the season with Royce Clayton as the starting shortstop would be a choice made not out of necessity or even out of strong market pressure, but rather one made as a result of the opinion that two veteran starting pitchers was a more important addition to the club than a starting shortstop. 

AWeb - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 09:38 AM EST (#159477) #

Starting the season with Royce Clayton as the starting shortstop would be a choice made not out of necessity or even out of strong market pressure, but rather one made as a result of the opinion that two veteran starting pitchers was a more important addition to the club than a starting shortstop. 

Sorry, I still don't see how signing a terrible player who might not be better than the terrible in house, cheaper options, leads to this conclusion. If you want to sign Lilly and Meche, which apparently the Jays do, then why get a below average fielder and awful hitter for short? Just don't sign anyone at shortstop until the pitching is sorted out, then see what's left and either sign or trade for a SS. At this point, Clayton is the "spring training invite" type, not the "sign for 1.5 million" type.  He's easily replaceable, or should be for a competent GM.

Jevant - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 09:44 AM EST (#159478) #

I think (and hope) what this finally says is "Aaron Hill, you are our starting 2nd baseman.  We will not be moving you between shortstop and 2nd base anymore.  You have job security, and we will not be messing around with your head, glove and footwork anymore."

Which would be smart.  Hill is developing quite nicely, and should turn into a fine ballplayer (and I think at least an above-average 2nd baseman, with probably an All-Star game or two). 

I can't shake the feeling that JP is probably going to pull off at least 1 trade (ala Glaus or O-Bay last year) that nobody will see coming and will shock everyone.  Did anyone really see Overbay and/or Glaus coming? (Maybe somebody did, but I know I was sure as heck shocked).  It looks like the lineup is more or less settled, although the bench could use some serious work (and maybe that's where a minor trade comes in).  But I wouldn't be surprised if something comes out of left-field (using the expression, not suggested Johnson be traded - although I wouldn't put that past JP either).

Ryan Day - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 09:50 AM EST (#159479) #

According to J.P., McDonald will serve as the backup infielder, and Russ Adams will start the year at AAA.

I'm not as down on the Clayton signing as some, but having both Clayton and McDonald on the roster is a pretty bad idea.

Mike Green - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 09:53 AM EST (#159481) #
AWeb, I wasn't intending to justify the acquisition.  Whether the club had signed Clayton to be the starting shortstop or simply asked McDonald to return to fill the role, rather than choosing a better alternative, the underlying assumption seems to be that money spent on veteran starting pitching is more important than money spent on a shortstop.  I don't agree with that view at all, but it appears from our poll that many here do. 
Jordan - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 09:55 AM EST (#159482) #

Signing both of them would allow the Jays to shop pitching, which would be interesting.

I thought about this last night, struggling as I was to fit these developments into my normally optimistic view of the team's chances. Assuming a Halladay-Burnett-Lilly-Meche rotation (a major assumption), you'd have a number of reasonable candidates for the #5 spot: Chacin, Marcum, Janssen and (yes) Towers (I think of Taubenheim, Rosario and McGowan as bullpen contributors at best for 2007). While that would give the Skychiefs one hell of a rotation early in the year, it would also give the Jays an uncommon number of young, affordable, league-tested starters from which to deal, either in spring training or at the trading deadline.

It's all speculation, obviously, but I find myself coming back to Bill Hall -- the Brewers appear intent on signing enough players to render him redundant, and Milwaukee needs pitching to compete in a wide-open NL Central. If the Jays are very comfortable with their 1-4 rotation slots, they could pull the trigger on a major trade from their young pitching surplus. Assuming no injuries and the acquisition of a reliable fourth outfielder, shortstop is really the only position where the Jays can upgrade themselves. And if they're serious about playing Royce Clayton, then they really need to upgrade themselves.

This all assumes a lot -- the odds of Toronto bagging Lilly and Meche both are very low. But add me to the chorus of Bauxites who believe that if the Jays had a four-year, $40 million contract to give to either Julio Lugo or Gil Meche, it should have gone to Lugo. I can only conclude that JP, having watched Chacin, Marcum, Janssen, Towers, Taubenheim and Downs start 72 games(!) last year with a collective ERA in the high 5.00s, swore to himself, "Never again." I can sympathize, but it would be a mistake to assume that all those guys will be as bad in '07 as they were in '06. Meche may be a bridge too far.

Jordan - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 09:58 AM EST (#159483) #

McDonald will serve as the backup infielder, and Russ Adams will start the year at AAA.

Sigh.

SNB - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 09:59 AM EST (#159484) #
Did anyone really see Overbay and/or Glaus coming?

I seem to remember a ton of talk about JP's mancrush on Overbay before that trade was finally completed. I will acknowledge, though, that the Glaus trade was completely unexpected.
SK in NJ - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 10:02 AM EST (#159485) #

Alex Gonzalez had a .299 OBP last season and 77 OPS+, yet people were suggesting the Jays sign him to a long-term deal. Granted, he's a better defensive player than Clayton, but most of the crying is due to Clayton's bat, and I think people need to understand that short-stop is not a buyer's market this year (or most years).

This deal keeps Hill at 2B and gives the team leverage. Why? Well, now if Adams comes into ST and beats the crap out of the ball, then Clayton is not someone who has to be the starting infielder. He's capable of playing both roles (starter or utility) and he doesn't come with the long-term contract that would necessitate starting (like Kennedy or Loretta, etc, would).

In 2003, Bordick was 37 and coming off two seasons where he hit .249/.314/.397 and .232/.302/.365 respectively. He ended up hitting .274/.340/.382 with Toronto. Chris Gomez had similar mediocrity in his offensive numbers, but came in and hit .282/.337/.346 (which is at the very least decent). Maybe coming to Toronto will help Clayton's offense as well, who knows.

At the very least, the Jays have depth now. If Johnson can't hit RHP next season, then Lind is just a bus ride away. If Clayton can't cut it, then Adams is there. Contending teams need veteran players to at least have an idea of what they are getting.

Jevant - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 10:17 AM EST (#159487) #

Funny you mention Chris Gomez, I was actually thinking about him in a similar stop-gap capacity (which is all Clayton is).

I hadn't realized that the Jays were forced to give 72 starts to those guys.  That's scary (and presumably what is driving JP).  At the same time, you have to expect there to be some injuries, and if we get both Lilly and Meche that gives us both depth and a very solid 1-4.  I can't see what is possibly wrong with that (see Tigers, Detroit - 2006, White Sox, Chicago - 2005).

At the same time, I just don't get the feeling we're going to get Lilly.  Not sure why, but I just have this feeling that he's playing TO and JP.  I'd like to be wrong, as he's my favourite of the options out there, but I just don't feel good about that.

Far be it from me to base opinions on feelings, but unfortunately there aren't any stats to use to judge Lilly's head (which always struck me as slightly different than the rest of ours anyways).  And I do worry about Ted's focus in a non-contract year.

Not terribly enthused about Meche, but all I'll say is that if we start the year with Chacin as our number 3, you can forget the playoffs.  Breakout seasons by young pitchers (McGowan, Janssen, Marcum, etc.) is what will put us over the top, not what you can rely on to make us competitive.

AWeb - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 10:27 AM EST (#159488) #

the underlying assumption seems to be that money spent on veteran starting pitching is more important than money spent on a shortstop

I see what you are saying, I think the terribleness of the signing in my head has made it hard to think straight...as is pointed out in the comments on the current poll, Clayton may soon have a legitimate claim to being the WORST HITTER IN ML HISTORY (career). Sorry, didn't mean to yell, but damn, when Neifi Perez may be a better choice, with better defense at least......(shakes head in disgust).

Soon I will enter the rationalization/acceptance phase, but for now I may enter the denial stage. The Jays didn't just sign Royce Clayton, it's all a terrifying dream. And Clayton is a good player, otherwise 10 different teams wouldn't have given him a chance, right?

Dave Till - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 10:41 AM EST (#159490) #
I'm not a huge fan of Clayton, but there's not much risk involved. If he can't cut it, out he goes.

The problem with Adams is that he didn't hit and he looked overmatched defensively last year. If he could field, I'd be willing to live with his bat, or vice versa. Since he's still in the organization, he can be brought back up if he takes a step forward on either front.

My guess is that the Clayton signing indicates that J.P. has given up on trying to find a middle infielder and is now going to spend the rest of his money on pitching.

Ryan Day - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 10:59 AM EST (#159491) #

 I don't think there's any way Adams is as bad as he looked in 2006. Talk of a wasted draft pick ignores the fact that even Baseball America said that Adams looked like a perfectly good leadoff hitter at the time he was drafted. There's a good likelihood he can bounce back to become a decent middle infielder.

  Of course, the one criticism that seems to have been validated is that he can't stay at short. But if Aaron Hill is the Jays' second baseman, where does Adams play? Left field? Or maybe the Jays will give him one more kick at the can at short; mediocre defence, backed up by Clayton or McDonald, might be acceptable if he can find out what happened to his swing.

Mike D - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 10:59 AM EST (#159492) #

bad defence

Saying Clayton is "bad" defensively overstates the case.  He makes all the routine plays, and Adams can't do that.  As far as his range goes, he's a reverse Jeter; very weak in the hole but very good up the middle.  (He's actually a reverse Jeter in many ways when you think about it.)

Count me among those who don't think this signing is very important.  It gives Adams another year to break through (which the signing of Lugo or Gonzalez would forever preclude) and shortstop can be upgraded mid-season if pennant race crowds are streaming into the RC.

danjulien - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 11:01 AM EST (#159493) #
Yeh Adams looked pretty done last year, let's hope half a season or more in AAA can cure what ails him.

I was playing around with my signed free agent database to add the new signings and I found something interesting. All the signings in the past few days were bargains (relatively to this market) and if we can hope that Mr. Clayton returns closer to his 3 year avg VORP, the guy is a good bargain...the 3rd best bargain of the off-season when comparing 3 year avg VORP to salary. Zauner is also a good signing by JP according to VORP, much better than Barajas would have been. 

Unfortunately, I know that this method ignores defense, but Counsell has had similar numbers to Clayton and is relatively the same age.  The biggest difference I can see is the fielding percentage last year but is that worth twice the money and twice the years?

Craig B - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 11:08 AM EST (#159496) #

Funny you mention Chris Gomez, I was actually thinking about him in a similar stop-gap capacity (which is all Clayton is).

Yeah, the HAMMER OF THOR worked out very well when he was here, and when he came in he was a worse performer than Clayton.

Except when their back has been completely against the wall, the Jays under Ricciardi have done pretty well at coaxing good performances out of most of their "stopgap" type position players.  Not just Gomez and Bordick, but also McDonald, Zaun, Menechino, Johnson, Myers, Wilson... some didn't work out well (Berg, Clark, Kevin Cash who was as much stopgap as prospect) but in general the record of the guys brought in and shoved in to plug a hole has been excellent as such players go.

Ryan Day - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 11:14 AM EST (#159498) #
 Even Dave Berg was pretty decent in his first year with the Jays. It was only later, during the Bad Times, that he fell apart. (Said Bad Times existing largely because Berg ended up playing in the outfield)
Chuck - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 11:20 AM EST (#159500) #

It's funny how things turn out. What do the Jays need on the bench? Someone who can play 1B, 3B and corner OF and preferably be a LHB with some pop. Sound like anyone that was sent packing to the Red Sox last year?

I'm not second-guessing getting rid of Hinske, it's just funny what a terrific fit he would be for this particular team.

Mike Green - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 11:44 AM EST (#159506) #
Mike D, the fielding metrics that I have access to all agree about Clayton's defence over the last 3 years.  He has been a "93" shortstop according to BP's Rate.  Chris Dial had him at -7 runs/150.  Here are David Pinto's charts from 2004. They reflect a player who is a little less than you describe- very weak in the hole, average on the ball up the middle, makes the play on the ball at him, and weak on the pop/blooper down the left-field line.  At his age, these things do not get better.
Marc Hulet - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 11:48 AM EST (#159508) #
Ryan Roberts (2B/3B), John Hattig (1B/3B) or Rob Cosby (1B, 3B, LF) could possibly fill the fourth bench spot for the minimum salary, along with Phillips, McDonald and a fourth outfielder.
Elijah - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 11:54 AM EST (#159509) #
I can't believe Royce Clayton is on the Blue Jays.  But like others have said, the short and relatively inexpensive commitment doesn't worry me.  Julio Lugo would be nice but I'm not convinced that he's worth 4/40.  Then again with the current market, I'm not sure who is really worth what.  Players are worth what they're paid, I suppose.

With all the talk about signing both Meche and Lilly, assuming they are going to cost at least $15M/season between them, why not consider one of the top pitchers like Schmidt or Zito?  I would prefer paying a premium for potential #1 or #2 starters instead of paying #3-4 starters $8-10M each.  I understand that there would be politics involved as Roy Halladay would not be the highest paid pitcher on the staff anymore but I'd much rather see a Schmidt or Zito than both Meche or Lilly.

If the Meche/Lilly situation is an either/or thing, I'd rather have Lilly even though Meche throws hard.  My opinion is that Lilly is a safer bet than Meche.  I suppose I'm just not that confident in the Blue Jays' ability to get the most out of talented veteran pitchers that have yet to reach their abililty (Halladay the notable exception).  That's probably not fair to Brad Arnsberg since there seem to be only so many Dave Duncans and Leo Mazzones and Bud Blacks around.
Chuck - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:01 PM EST (#159511) #

It gives Adams another year to break through

While I agree that Adams may have something in the tank, and might be able to turn into a major leaguer, his fit on this team isn't great. Hill sure seems like a second baseman and not a shortstop, and the Clayton signing appears to suggest that the team sees things this way as well. The trouble is, I can only envision Adams playing second base, not shortstop. The Jays have nowhere to play him to see if he can develop, unless they're prepared to keep yanking Hill around. For the sake of Hill's development, I hope they can lock him in at second base and just leave him there. Adams' upside isn't worth tampering with Hill's development.

Adams will have to end up on a team and serve as their plan B second baseman, and hope to luck into some playing time to allow him to develop. I don't believe the Jays are that team.

 

Jordan - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:13 PM EST (#159516) #

I'd much rather see a Schmidt or Zito than both Meche or Lilly.

Me too, and it would be a good use of the dollars. Unfortunately, I don't think either player is seriously considering the Jays as a destination. Schmidt reportedly has said he doesn't want to play on the east coast (I don't know if Toronto qualifies), and Scott Boras says Zito has a list of eight teams for which he'd play, and I haven't heard that the Jays are one of them. For my money, Zito ends up a Met and Schmidt goes to Texas, or maybe Seattle.

Paul D - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:18 PM EST (#159517) #
OFF TOPIC POST re: BTF

You can access it here:

http://66.197.210.165/

Jim explains what's going on on the front page.

Chuck - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:32 PM EST (#159518) #

I look a the Jays and I seem a team very deep in cheap, internal candidates who can deliver a 5.00 ERA (Chacin, Marcum, Janssen, perhaps even Towers). The back of the rotation is taken care of, and taken care of cheaply.

How does the upgrade from one of the aforementioned $300K types to an $8-10M Meche make any sense? That's a lot of change to spend on someone who may look better than the aforementioned lot, but still not necessarily perform any better.

It's obviously a moot point now, but throwing that Meche money at Lugo would have nicely resolved the middle infield for the next few years. I don't see how Meche + Clayton > Marcum + Lugo.

VBF - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:38 PM EST (#159519) #

It's funny how things turn out. What do the Jays need on the bench? Someone who can play 1B, 3B and corner OF and preferably be a LHB with some pop.

He can't get you the third base defence, but Matt Stairs gets pretty close to that description.

Glevin - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:56 PM EST (#159520) #

"It's obviously a moot point now, but throwing that Meche money at Lugo would have nicely resolved the middle infield for the next few years. I don't see how Meche + Clayton > Marcum + Lugo"

I'm not sure why the love affair with Meche exists to begin with. Last year was his best year and he still went under 200 IP with a WHIP of 1.43 in a pitcher's park. I hate the idea of spending anywhere near $10 million a season on a mediocre pitcher. 4/40 is too much for Lugo, but that would still be better spent if Meche indeed gets that kind of cash.

Squiggy - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 01:12 PM EST (#159522) #
I agree with the above - I too feel Meche can only disappoint at the salaries being thrown about. I am still holding out hope of starting up the "Padilla Flotilla" at the Rogers Centre next year. Not optimistic though, as I have not heard his name in any recent updates from Blair et al.

Although JP must have a plan, it seems like a strange and scattered one at this point - while I agree that Hill should remain a 2B, it seems like this was a decision that was forced upon JP by Kennedy signing and perhaps Lugo demands. At least he's flexible, I suppose.
Mike Forbes - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 02:26 PM EST (#159530) #
Anyone think that Russ Adams should get a shot in the outfield at Syracuse? This would increase his value to the Jays if he could atleast become average in left or maybe even play a passable center. There would be the teams inexpensive 4th outfielder, plus he can spell Aaron Hill at second if Aaron goes on the DL at any point.
Mike Green - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 02:38 PM EST (#159531) #
I had suggested the "Adams super-utility plan" in 2005 when Hill and Hudson were around.  Personally, I think that I would try left-field rather than center.  It's enough to learn to play the outfield without playing to his arm-strength weakness.
Marc Hulet - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 02:52 PM EST (#159532) #
I'd like to see you list even five legitimate No. 5 starters better than Chacin. Chacin would be one of the top 3 best No. 5 pitchers in baseball... I don't think people really understand how little team's get out of a No. 5 pitcher. Two years ago Josh Towers and Bruce Chen (O's) were heads above any other No. 5 starter in baseball.
Marc Hulet - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 04:50 PM EST (#159544) #
I don't think Hall is as redundant in Milwaukee as everyone seems to think, especially given the concerns over Koskie's health:

C-Johnny Estrada
1B-Prince Fielder
2B-Rickie Weeks
3B-Corey Koskie (if healthy - or Hall)
SS-JJ Hardy
LF-Kevin Mench
CF-Billy Hall
RF-Geoff Jenkins

C-Damien Miller
IF-Craig Counsell
IF/OF-Corey Hart
OF-Gabe Gross
OF-Brady Clark

Magpie - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 07:08 PM EST (#159553) #
I mercilessly mocked the Arizona Diamondbacks in the spring of 2005 when they installed Counsell and Clayton as their shiny new DP combination. That bit me in the ass but good, so I'll keep my mouth shut this time.

Anyway, I don't like ANY of the alternatives. I don't want to give Lugo four years, or Gonzalez three. Neither of them looks worth it to me. I don't like either of them enough to want them around for more than a year, at this point. And while John McDonald may normally be roughly comparable to Clayton, if you play Johnny Mac every day he can't sustain even that level of sub-competence. We all saw that happen in the second half of last year, and wondered where all those erratic unforced errors were coming from.

Well, I was wondering.

Magpie - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 07:46 PM EST (#159560) #
my comparison of Lilly and Zito

Well then, let's look at how they've pitched in neutral parks.

         ERA   W  L   G GS CG  IP    H   R   ER  HR  BB  SO  AVG
Lilly   4.92  15 20  45 45  1 247.0 244 141 135  40 115 189 .253
Zito    3.77  21 15  51 51  0 325.2 303 150 136  34 146 251 .249

Surprised? I was. But coming into 2006, Zito basically had no home-road split to speak of; after pitching much better away from home this past season his overall splits are now better on the road than at home (51-33, 3.44 on the road, 51-30, 3.66 at home) And over the last three years he's been distinctly better on the road - he's gone 20-19, 4.32 in Oakland while going 21-15 3.77 on the road. The reason? He's been much more vulnerable to the home run at McAfee (47 allowed in 338.2 IP at home, 34 in 325.2 on the road.)

Lilly over the last three years has a similar home-road split - but it's the other way round. Lilly has been better in Toronto (22-14, 4.15) than on the road (15-20, 4.92). Away from the Dome, he gives up a few more hits, a few more walks, a few more homers - and strikes many fewer hitters for some reason.
Marc Hulet - Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 09:09 PM EST (#159564) #
I think people are also over-estimating how much depth teams have in their minors. A team gets one, maybe two (if they're lucky) players each year from their system to help out. The Jays have Lind who could help out with the bat. They have a plethora of pitching that could help out in the pen, but the relievers have been relatively healthy.

Sure they lack some depth at shortstop but Mayorson may be ready to be the next John McDonald in a year and Klosterman is definitely a sleeper at shortstop in a year or two. Thigpen should be ready in a year or less...Ryan Patterson is on the way... They have bench potential help with Hattig, Cosby, etc. They took a lot of promising players in the 2006 draft and the pitching at triple-A includes Janssen, Taubenheim, Ramirez, Houston, Thorpe, Banks, Towers, Romero, Vermilyea, Gronkiewicz, DeJong, MacDonald, Yates, etc.

The Jays probably have 10 pitchers in triple-A who could help out if needed... They may not be stars but they are useful. There aren't many teams that have that kind of near-MLB ready pitching at triple-A.
Mike Green - Sunday, December 03 2006 @ 11:44 AM EST (#159696) #
Dan Szymborski's take on the Clayton signing complete with ZIPS projection is here.

Chuck - Sunday, December 03 2006 @ 12:21 PM EST (#159697) #
Has anyone, anywhere remarked favourably on the Clayton deal (not that they should)? If he were a rule 5 guy with those numbers, would anyone even be interested in paying him the league minimum? His veteran status seems to be carrying more value than is reasonable.
Blue Jays Sign Royce Clayton | 173 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.