Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
It's deadline day, and the deals have started. The Pirates sent Sean Casey to the Tigers for right-handed pitcher Brian Rogers (with Chris Shelton being punished for yesterday's error with a trip to Toledo). Rheal Cormier is now a Red with right-handed pitcher Justin Germano going to the Philies in return.








Julio Lugo is off to LA, but he might not want to unpack his bags. He is a free agent after the season.









What's next?
Deadline Day | 134 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Paul D - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 12:03 PM EDT (#151978) #
Kyle Loshe to the Reds for minor league right-hander Zach Ward.
Chuck - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 12:08 PM EDT (#151980) #
With Casey on board, Shelton was sent to AAA. It's better to burn out, then to fade away (my, my, hey, hey).
Mike Green - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 12:17 PM EDT (#151981) #
Making the case that Sean Casey is a more valuable first baseman than Chris Shelton takes some creative statistical work.  Dave Dombrowski has made few false steps this season, or for that matter during his tenure with the Tigers. This one is reversible by simply calling Shelton back up in three weeks and making Casey a valuable bat off the bench..
Mick Doherty - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 12:21 PM EDT (#151982) #

Them Reds be active!

The Twins traded right-hander Kyle Lohse to the Reds for minor league right-hander Zach Ward.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 01:21 PM EDT (#151988) #

This is posted here just to give us all something to kick around while waiting for the deals. A co-worker of mine suggested this one to me: what would it take to get Michael Young from the Rangers?

One, he'd solve the shortstop problem immediately. Two, he's incredibly cheap ($3.5M in 2007, $4M club option for 2008). Third, if he's supposedly the biggest reason why Vernon Wells would decamp for Texas, remove that problem by making him Wells' teammate right now. A Jays' lineup with Young batting second would give even the Yanks and Red Sox offences a run for their money.

Now, the Rangers are as eager to deal Young as the Jays are to trade Wells -- he's their best player, the cornerstone around which the team is built, and even less expensive than Vernon. I frankly don't see them doing it. But Texas is tied for 9th in league ERA (the Jays are 8th), and their lineup even without Young is pretty fearsome. If the Jays called with an offer of McGowan, League, Yates and Adams, I expect the Rangers would at least listen.

That's the theory, anyway. As I say, the chances of it actually happening are slim to none. But if you were Ricciardi, and you were given to understand Texas would part with Young for a passel of your best young pitchers, would you do it?

Pepper Moffatt - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 01:27 PM EDT (#151989) #
I'd do that trade in a heartbeat.  No ways the Rangers do it.

Barry Bonnell - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 01:34 PM EDT (#151991) #
No way on God's green earth do the Rangers do that trade. Frankly, besides Halladay I don't see the Rangers trading Young for anyone on our roster.
Mick Doherty - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 01:39 PM EDT (#151992) #

BB, that's not quite true. Living here in DFW, I can tell you that Jon Daniels would at least listen to an offer of Halladay, Ryan and Hill for Young and, say, a minor league pitcher not considered a future potential ace.

But yeah, not terribly likely to happen.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 01:49 PM EDT (#151993) #

Mick, would it really take that much? Texas is in a similar position with Young as Toronto is with Wells -- they only have control over him for another couple of years, and then they'll certainly lose him to free agency or bust the bank trying to keep him. If an offer of a lot of good young talent came in (perhaps not the offer I suggested, but not the Jays franchise, as you suggested) this winter, wouldn't Daniels have to ask himself if the Rangers would be better off with Young for two more years or all those young pitchers for six?

I ask this not knowing much about the Rangers' system -- if they have good young pitchers coming up about whom they feel confident, then they wouldn't feel the need to trade Young away. But if not, well, pitching has long been the franchise's achilles heel, and if dealing Young could help solve it, why not?

Mike Green - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 01:55 PM EDT (#151997) #
In Texas, the acronym for their trio of pitching prospects is DVD- Diamond, Volquez and Danks.  Summary of all three- erratic, but very promising.  None of them, I believe, has had arm surgery of any kind yet.  Eric Hurley is not bad either.
Mick Doherty - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:00 PM EDT (#151998) #

Of course I was exaggerating, but not much -- Young isnot only the #2 AL guy in hits (behind Ichiro, of course) but clearly the team leader in most coneiveable ways. I really do think Daniels would start the conversation with Halladay, if only to scare off the Jays.

The DVD boys -- Danks is probably the best and closest, and his name has come up recently in a three-way rumor involving Tejada to Houston and Roy Oswalt ending up in Texas, so that should give you some idea of how good the Rangers at least think these kids are. The Mets can tell stories of Wilson, Pulsipher and Isringhausen, though WIP isn't as cool a nickname as DVD.

Mick Doherty - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:03 PM EDT (#152000) #

Besides, if the Jays paid ransom to reacquire Young, could you really stomach the inevitable re-hashing of the Loaiza deal that would last for ... oh, forever?

Jim - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:06 PM EDT (#152001) #
WIP isn't as cool a nickname as DVD.

Their nickname was actually much cooler:  Generation K
VBF - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:09 PM EDT (#152002) #

Michael Young's contract expires after 2007--the same year as Vernon's. Even if the Jays could make that trade, JP and Rogers would have to pull a miracle to be able to keep them both here past 2007.

Now that I think about it, if they choose to sign Lee long-term, and then have to do the same for Michael Young, all while trying to bolster their rotation through free agency, they will have to have alot of spare cash to be able to sign a potential 15 million dollar player centerfielder.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:10 PM EDT (#152003) #
Fair enough.
Justin (T-Birds) - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:12 PM EDT (#152004) #

I don't really buy into they hype about Young.  His offence, while very good for a shortstop, is overrated in my opinion. Looking at his career progression, 2005 screams career year to me (and all his numbers have been put up in Arlington, mind you):

2002, Age 25 - .262/.308/.382 (OPS: 690)
2003, Age 26 - .306/.339/.446 (OPS: 785)
2004, Age 27 - .313/.353/.483 (OPS: 836)
2005, Age 28 - .331/.385/.513 (OPS: 898)
2006, Age 29 - .312/.355/.454 (OPS: 809)

Rod Black's endless gushing over Young aside, I'm not impressed with Young's defence (and I think that most defensive numbers agree, IIRC).  He'd certainly be a fine addition to the Blue Jays, but I think his value is exagerrated.

Frank Markotich - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:15 PM EDT (#152006) #
Not advocating it, but Vernon Wells for Michael Young would have a certain amusement value.
Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:15 PM EDT (#152007) #

Besides, if the Jays paid ransom to reacquire Young, could you really stomach the inevitable re-hashing of the Loaiza deal that would last for ... oh, forever?

Meh ... on Gord Ash's head be it. I've long since stopped worrying about that deal -- kudos to Texas for making a great trade.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:22 PM EDT (#152008) #

Michael Young's contract expires after 2007--the same year as Vernon's.

Young's contract has a 2008 club option for $4M, which the Rangers will obviously pick up. Frankly, if he's as valuable to the franchise as Mick says, the Rangers should tear up his deal in the off-season and offer a brand-new extension at less than expected 2008 FA market value, if possible.

As for making that kind of deal from the Jays' strategic standpoint, it would obviously be in the context of a going-for-it all-decision -- no way you can keep both Wells and Young long-term. And really, the booty they'd need to send to Texas would probably kibosh their chances regardless. It's fun to think about acquiring Young, but it's pitching the Jays need, not more offence.

But if a deal like that somehow netted you a World Series in that window of opportunity, then of course it's worth it, no matter if you lose both Wells and Young later on.

js_magloire - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 02:32 PM EDT (#152010) #
Someone tell me why the Loaiza trade was so kick-them-while-they're-down for the Jays? I wasn't following them that closely back then.
Jonny German - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:00 PM EDT (#152016) #

Someone tell me why the Loaiza trade was so kick-them-while-they're-down for the Jays? I wasn't following them that closely back then.

It wasn't. Young was a mediocre prospect and Loazia gave the Jays great return the year they acquired him (2000) - A 3.62 ERA over 14 starts, 92 innings, good for an ERA+ of 137. It's what happened after that that makes Jays fans all bitter about the whole thing.

First, El Gordo decided it would be a good idea to give Loazia a fat extension.

Second, Loaiza was bad in 2001 and terrible in 2002.

Third, the Rangers stuck with Michael Young and he rewarded them with a ridiculous growth curve. Seriously, look at the numbers Justin posted above and the ages with them. Michael Young from age 25 to 28 went through the kind of growth curve you'd optimistically hope for from a top prospect from ages 22 through 25.

Fourth, Loaiza left town with much good riddance, only to turn in a Cy Young contending season for the White Sox.

If Gord hadn't extended Loaiza and if Young had developed at all normally, you'd never hear about that trade.

Mike Green - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:12 PM EDT (#152019) #
The Marlins are apparently interested in Soriano, and are allegedly offering among others Yusmeiro Petit.  Ch-ch-ch-anges.
Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:22 PM EDT (#152025) #
The latest word (via ESPN News via several sources) is the Mets getting Roberto Hernandez and Oliver Perez for Xavier Nady.
Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:24 PM EDT (#152027) #
The Mets lost Duaner Sanchez for the season with a separated shoulder in a car accident last night. Hence, evidently, this trade, and a pretty nice one for Pittsburgh it is.
smcs - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:32 PM EDT (#152030) #
CBS Sportsline reports that the Cubs have traded Todd Walker to the Padres for a minor league pitcher that has not been named.
Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:33 PM EDT (#152032) #

I'm not as enthusiastic about this from a Pirates perspective.  Nady's 27, so this is likely as good as he's going to get, and his career OBP is .322.  Add in his defense and he's not a championship-quality player and isn't likely to become one.  Perez isn't likely to turn it around in Pittsburgh, but he has value (as does Hernandez, especially with the price we've seen for arms); the Pirates would have been better off dealing Hernandez separately for whatever they could get and if dealing Perez was necessary, to try to get a similar gifted but stalled young pitcher from another organization.

Nady, at least, is something, and will help the '07 Pirates be not as awful as the '06 version, which is something.

Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:41 PM EDT (#152034) #

Walker for a PTBNL (apparently the Cubs are still going to pay him, I heard?) is a nothing deal.  The Padres must be disappointed that their potential Ensberg deal fell through, because Walker looks to me like another roll of loaded dice, no more likely to work out than Castilla or Blum or Bellhorn did.

In the last two years, here's who has played third base for San Diego:

  1. Sean Burroughs
  2. Damian Jacksom
  3. Xavier Nady (hello again!)
  4. Mark Loretta
  5. Manny Alexander
  6. Rob Fick
  7. Geoff Blum
  8. Joe Randa
  9. Vinny Castilla
  10. Mark Bellhorn
  11. Apparently, Todd Walker

The Padres really need to sit down over the winter and identify a young third baseman, and trade for him or acquire him with the goal of giving him the job next season.  This revolving door of Whoever Is Available And Once Had A Good Season is killing them.

Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:47 PM EDT (#152036) #
Also, I just heard over at Primer that ESPN News announced that the Rangers had traded for Matt Stairs.  I find that to be totally bizarre.
Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:49 PM EDT (#152037) #
Yup, the Rangers site confirms it.  Stairs to the Rangers for Joselo Diaz, who is a pretty nice minor league reliever (as minor league relievers go).  I suppose trading away Nix and Mench meant that Texas needed a bat.
Mike Forbes - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:49 PM EDT (#152038) #
Foxsports.com says Kip Wells is joining the Rangers.. The return for Wells is not yet known.
Mike Green - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:51 PM EDT (#152041) #
Cormier, Stairs...I sense a pattern. Moving day, eh?
smcs - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:53 PM EDT (#152042) #
cbs sportsline reporting that The Mets are going to trade Oliver Perez and Heath Bell to the Padres for Scott Linebrink
Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:56 PM EDT (#152043) #

The Rangers have been making so deals I can't keep their roster straight.  After the Nix/Mench for Carlos Lee deal, they picked up Miguel Ojeda, traded Bryan Corey to the Red Sox, and now this.  They were involved in talks for Tejada, for Lieber, for Lidge, for Westbrook.  Last I heard, Jon Daniels was down at Staples trying to swing a deal of a Adam Eaton signed jockstrap for a package of name tags that he can distribute around the clubhouse.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 03:56 PM EDT (#152045) #

Heh ... the Padres get Oliver Perez back? Now if only they can find a way to reacquire Jason Bay.

Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:00 PM EDT (#152046) #

Is that five trades in three days by Texas!?  Wow.

If Linebrink is really going to the Mets, that's a pretty good deal for them.  Bell's OK, but Linebrink and Hernandez are a nice return for him and Nady.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:01 PM EDT (#152048) #
See, now's a great time for the Jays to acquire Michael Young. Slip him out the door in all the confusion. :-)
smcs - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:02 PM EDT (#152049) #
ESPN reports Shawn Chacon for Craig Wilson
Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:06 PM EDT (#152050) #

I don't even see how that's possible.  Everyone's been jocking Littlefield because he was asking the moon for Wilson.  Now he deals him at the last second for Shawn Chacon?  What a #%^&#%^& tool.

Becoming a Pirates fan after the death of the Expos was the worst notion I ever had.  Between this and the Jays succumbing on this roadtrip, I @$&)@%$&*(%ing  hate baseball right now.

@$%^@%$&  @#$^  bloody  !#$%!#$^#!$

 

smcs - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:08 PM EDT (#152052) #
Ken Rosenthal reports that the Dodgers have acquired Greg Maddux with at least $1 million going from the Cubs to the Dodgers.  No report on who is going the other way
Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:11 PM EDT (#152053) #
Apparently, the warm body going to Chicago for Maddux is our old friend Cesar Izturis.
Thomas - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:11 PM EDT (#152054) #
Wow. I can't believe it.

I hate the bloody Yankees. So much.

Chuck - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:16 PM EDT (#152055) #
Wells to the Rangers. It actually happened.

Okay, Kip Wells.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:17 PM EDT (#152056) #
I'm not sure what the Yankees are going to do with Wilson. Abreu's in right, Giambi's DHing, and he's not a platoon partner with Andy Phillips. Is he just a bench guy?
smcs - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:18 PM EDT (#152057) #
He might be a late-game defensive substitution for A-Rod
Chuck - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:18 PM EDT (#152058) #
Apparently, the warm body going to Chicago for Maddux is our old friend Cesar Izturis.

Hmmm, stockpiling Neifi Perez clones. Lock up MacDonald. Stat!
Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:28 PM EDT (#152061) #
I hear an as-yet-unfounded rumor that the Dodgers got Lugo, which is no doubt why they gave up Izturis for Maddux.
Ron - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:28 PM EDT (#152062) #
Lugo has been traded to the Dodgers for 2 prospects. One of them is suppose to be Guzman.

Nicely done TB.


smcs - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:29 PM EDT (#152063) #
Lugo to Dodgers for Joel Guzman and Sergio Pedroza according to ESPN
Pepper Moffatt - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:31 PM EDT (#152065) #
Wow.. that Chacon trade is unbelievably bad.  What were the Pirates thinking?!? They'd have been better off giving Wilson away for free.

In any sane universe, that trade gets vetoed.  This wouldn't have happened if Bowie Kuhn were alive today.:)
Mick Doherty - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:31 PM EDT (#152066) #

Making the case that Sean Casey is a more valuable first baseman than Chris Shelton takes some creative statistical work.

Nah. Jimmy Leyland won flags with Orlando Merced, Sid Bream and Jeff Conine at 1B -- Casey is his kind of player. Shelton's K/BB of 100/32 falls way short of Casey's 22/23.

Not sure I like the move, really, but I think you can make a case(y) for it.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:32 PM EDT (#152067) #

Starting first baseman Craig Wilson? Makes sense.

Nicely played by the D-Rays -- no wonder David Purcey didn't interest them. That franchise gets more interesting by the day.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:34 PM EDT (#152069) #

Why are we hearing rumours at 4:30?

The Commissioner's Office is probably still sorting through all the 3:57 faxes. The ones from Texas alone would require a dedicated staff person.

Ron - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:34 PM EDT (#152071) #
Ryan Shealy is now a Royal.

Affeldt/Denny Bautista to Colorado for Ryan Shealy and a minor league pitcher.

Chuck - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:35 PM EDT (#152072) #
You think Littlefield makes his decision based on baseball cards? Maybe he won't know about Chacon's crappy 2006 until next year's baseball cards are out.

Isn't he due to utter the Sabeanesque "I'm not an idiot" any time now?

Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:36 PM EDT (#152074) #

That franchise gets more interesting by the day.

The Wreck Of The Medusa was interesting too.  Apparently the new sport in Tampa Bay is pissing off the front office in a naked attempt to get yourself traded the heck out of there.

The Devil Rays have never developed a pitcher of any consequence whatsoever, so they better hope that Guzman is a totally finished article or that their organization has really changed for the better.

Chuck - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:38 PM EDT (#152076) #
The Devil Rays have never developed a pitcher of any consequence whatsoever, so they better hope that Guzman is a totally finished article or that their organization has really changed for the better.

Or that Steve Phillips is back in the GM business sometime soon.
Mike Green - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:39 PM EDT (#152077) #
Can someone please enlighten me on the value of Shawn Chacon to the Pirates?  He's got 5 years of service, and is earning 3.6 million.  They're not going to offer him arbitration, would they?  And they're not going to win in 2006, are they?

Wouldn't, let's say, Aaron Tressler (a 24 year old low A pitcher having a good season) be more valuable to the Pirates than Shawn Chacon?  Surely, Littlefield could have done better than that for Craig Wilson. Heck, I'd trade Aaron Tressler for Craig Wilson. 

Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:41 PM EDT (#152078) #

Shealy for Affeldt/Bautista - I'm loath to call this a steal for Colorado but it's certainly not a rock-solid showing for KC, who had almost no young pitching to begin with and now have less.  They are also developing a logjam at the first base/DH positions, not for the first time in Kansas City.

At least Shealy will get his shot in the majors now.

Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:46 PM EDT (#152080) #

Can someone please enlighten me on the value of Shawn Chacon to the Pirates? 

If we're really, really lucky the Pirates want to turn him back into a closer so he can take a run at the blown saves record.  The only problem with the plan is that the Pirates don't get enough leads for a closer to blow.

Sorry for the snark, but the more I think of this the more despondent I get.  I know Craig Wilson's not a great player (useful at best) but this is the worst trade of the year, easily (far, far worse than the Nationals-Reds deal) because there is absolutely no chance whatsoever that this could work out.  Shawn Chacon couldn't possibly return any value to the Pirates on his current deal that would merit paying anything for.  What's on my desk right now would have been a better package for Craig Wilson.

Mike Green - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:48 PM EDT (#152082) #
Guzman is no longer a great prospect.  He's a left-fielder/first-baseman/DH with great power potential and adequate but not great strike zone control.  I guess with all the discipline problems among the Ray outfield prospects, Guzman has value, but he does seem like a strange target.
Ron - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:50 PM EDT (#152083) #
I'm surprised the Nats didn't jump at the Garza/Baker offer from the Twins. They better hope Soriano re-ups after this season.

As a GM it would be hard for me to turn down one of the best pitching prospects in the game for a player that will be a FA.

Jordan - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:52 PM EDT (#152084) #
And despite all the noise, Alfonso Soriano remains in Washington.
Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:53 PM EDT (#152085) #
Apparently the Royals got Scott Dohmann along with Shealy (accoridng to mlb4u), which makes the trade considerably better for them.  In fact, I kind of like the deal now... Dohmann has a live arm and has pitched well enough for Colorado that you'd like to try him in a slightly better park for a pitcher.  He's older than Affeldt and Bautista, but only by a couple of years, and with Shealy probably the best player in the package you can spin it as a win for KC.
Pepper Moffatt - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:55 PM EDT (#152086) #
"What's on my desk right now would have been a better package for Craig Wilson."

Well, duh!  Who wouldn't want a complete set of Laverne & Shirley action figures?  Squiggy alone is worth Wilson!
Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 04:56 PM EDT (#152087) #

I'm surprised the Nats didn't jump at the Garza/Baker offer from the Twins. They better hope Soriano re-ups after this season.

I think this is nutty on the Nats' part.  They caught lightning in a bottle with Soriano, but that lightning is going to electrocute them if it forms the basis of a longterm deal.  I still don't think Soriano is all that great; a valuable guy, sure, but not worth giving $12 million a year to and forgoing the chance at Baker (who I like a lot) and Garza (who you could flip for something very useful).

Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 05:12 PM EDT (#152093) #

We have no idea whether what the Blue Jays have could have landed Shealy - the Rockies might have out-and-out preferred Affeldt/Bautista, both of whom are pretty toolsy pitchers and might do well in another organization.

Shealy also wouldn't have had a role on this Jays team - he really can't play much, if any, defense (probably why the Rockies were looking to deal him in the first place - in Denver you must be able to play good defense, it's a necessity in that park).  So he'd be relegated to DH duty and drive good bats to the bench.  He's also not young (he will be 27 in a month), so he's not as much a "prospect" as a right-now type, someone who should hit for the next three years, probably put up an 825-850 OPS in the AL if he can successfully make the transition to the major league level.  I think he's a better hitter than Eric Hinske.

I don't think that's worth two good SP prospects.  Two "C+" types, sure.  Shealy has it in him to be an average-producing DH for the next three years, very inexpensively.  That has quite a lot of value.  But I don't (and the Rockies didn't) see Shealy as the kind of elite-level hitter who should command a high price.

Mike Green - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 05:12 PM EDT (#152094) #
The Dodgers acquiring Lugo and Maddux is very interesting.  They're 5 games back in last place in a poor division.  BP makes their playoff odds to be 12%.  Every team's situation is a little bit different, with budgetary concerns being one prime difference, but that the Dodgers are going for it says something.
Craig B - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 05:16 PM EDT (#152095) #

I'm dissapointed that we didn't hear much trade talk about Craig Wilson coming to the Jays.

If I'm the Jays, Wilson is the perfect LHP masher to spell Hinske at DH.

I don't imagine that anyone thinks that a platoon DH (the lesser side of the platoon, too) adds a lot of value to a team that has an abundance of RHB to begin with, though.  Wilson just replicates Shea Hillenbrand's basic skills and Hillenbrand's skills were probably surplus to requirements anyway.

timpinder - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 05:23 PM EDT (#152096) #

The Jays didn't do anything today, but I wonder if they won't still make a trade.  I wouldn't be surprised to see J.P. place Molina and Hinske on waivers.  With Rios/Johnson/Wells in the outfield and Catalanotto the primary left-handed hitting DH, Hinske is really not going to play.  Maybe J.P. can shed some of his salary.

Thoughts?

Gerry - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 05:25 PM EDT (#152097) #
You can put Hinske and Molina on waivers, and they would clear, but who wants them, or to put it another way, would you get anything back for them?
Chuck - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 05:31 PM EDT (#152098) #
The Yankees would be interested in Molina, I would think. Hell, their current backup is Sal Fasano.
ayjackson - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 05:32 PM EDT (#152099) #

The Jays didn't do anything today, but I wonder if they won't still make a trade.  I wouldn't be surprised to see J.P. place Molina and Hinske on waivers.  With Rios/Johnson/Wells in the outfield and Catalanotto the primary left-handed hitting DH, Hinske is really not going to play.  Maybe J.P. can shed some of his salary.

Thoughts?

does he have one or two more years left?  i think you'd spare him the humiliation of waivers if nobody is going to pick him up.  better ask around first.  after all, he has been the consumate professional as he as learned to play a new position every year and play sporadically at times.

i wonder if the mets called about speier?

Mike Green - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 05:37 PM EDT (#152100) #
Eric Hinske's contract ends in 2007. 
SheldonL - Monday, July 31 2006 @ 05:49 PM EDT (#152101) #

i wonder if the mets called about speier?

I can't believe that Oliver Perez got traded twice today! I certainly hope the Jays atleast made a feeler offer for him. The Mets wanted premier relief pitching(a la Hernandez, Linebrink) but in my mind Speier is better than both of them. Speier for Perez would have been hard to swallow for the 2006 campaign but considering Speier's going to be in pinstripes next year anyway, I would have loved to have Perez, who's going to be the next Chris Carpenter feel-good story.

Craig B - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 08:32 AM EDT (#152121) #

If the Angels offered the same package with Wood instead of Aybar for Wells, would you do it?

I think that would be overpaying about three times over for Wells, though.  I like Vernon A LOT, but Tejada is twice the player he is.

Craig B - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 10:58 AM EDT (#152128) #

I see your point; this makes the value to the Angels of Wells and Tejada closer.  It doesn't affect their market value, though... Wells is still a CF and Tejada is still a shortstop, even if the defensive "hole" that both would fill would be the third base slot.  The fact that the Angels would be more inclined to pay top dollar for Wells because of the existence of Figgins is a good catch, and you might get more for him on that basis, but Stoneman's pretty smart and would realize that he wouldn't need to overpay for Wells just because Figgins gives him flexibility.

It certainly would have been worth a shot, but I'm sure there's no way that the Jays get that package for Wells. 

Craig B - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 11:03 AM EDT (#152129) #
I was thinking this morning. Baseball really really needs a new playoff format. It should be 8 teams per league, or at least 6, with 2 bi's.   I agree 100%, always have, but advocating expanded playoffs around here puts us in a minority of two.  For some reason, people have a blind spot to (1) the excitement of playoff baseball; and (2) the impact that an expanded playoff would have on attendance and interest all through the year.   I am convinced that one of the many reasons the NFL's popularity is so pervasive is that almost every team remains in the playoff hunt until there's only one month or so to go.
But the Red Sox Yankees in September sure does.   I'm pretty sure the Yankees and Red Sox would have no trouble selling out their games against each other even if both were guaranteed a playoff position in March.  :)
dan gordon - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 11:32 AM EDT (#152134) #
Blue Jays owner, Rogers Communications, today reported a tremendous increase in their profitability in the most recent quarter.  Net income was up from $19 million to $277 million for the quarter.  Can't hurt to have an owner making big profits - perhaps a little more could be applied to the Blue Jays payroll.
jjdynomite - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 11:44 AM EDT (#152137) #
To add to what Caramon wrote, in the NFL, NHL and NBA playoffs, because of their inclusiveness, there is really no guaranteed winner in a short series, which creates excitement.  Nobody but fans from Northern Alberta would have picked last year that the Oilers would beat the Wings, but it happened in a 1 vs. 8; in MLB, there is 0 chance of an 8,7,6 or 5 seed doing any damage because the playoff system doesn't allow for it.  Imagine the Marlins over Yankees in 2003 happening *every year*, and that's what the other 3 leagues offer.

If you wanted a "100% guarantee" competitive sport, go root for the top 4 teams in the English Premiere League which are the top 4 every single year since the Premiereship started in 1992.  The Yankees, RedSox, Mets and Braves are quite simply the ManU, Chelsea, Arsenal and Blackburn of the USA.  They can pull this off because outisde of Blackburn they spend the most money, and the season is long, like MLB.  I can imagine that Jays fans and West Bromwich fans have a lot in common.

P.S. Yes, there are teams like the As who are successful on a smaller budget; let's have them face the Yankees and RedSox's combined $330 million payroll 36 times a year and see how they do then.
Mike Green - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 12:15 PM EDT (#152138) #
Here is Blair's deadline day recap.
actionjackson - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 12:44 PM EDT (#152140) #
Expanding the playoff pool would hopefully also push the non-waiver trade deadline back to August 15 or August 31 because on July 31, there might be 4 or 5 sellers and 25 or 26 buyers and that would make the trade market more akin to molasses then this year's was. In order to have a decent market I would think you need about 12 sellers and 18 buyers. This year was phhht. It's amazing how few deals the last 8 world champs have made at the deadline. Something like 5 total. Maybe these deadline deals are all sound and fury signifying nothing. I still would've liked to get an innings eater for the 4 spot, but not at those prices.
VBF - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 01:45 PM EDT (#152149) #

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if a team elects to place a player on waivers, and a team picks up that player, do they inherit the total remaining amount on his contract?

It probably goes against the grain to suggest this, but what about placing A.J. Burnett on waivers?

Mike Green - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 02:01 PM EDT (#152152) #
That was done, famously, in the 2003 Manny Ramirez incident (Coach called it "Manny for nothing", and a wag added "and get Youkilis for free".  The Sox found no takers, and it ended up working out OK for them.
Ron - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 02:43 PM EDT (#152158) #
The O-Dog is having a career year this season. He's hitting .275/.339/.422 with 11 HR's and 8 SB's.

He was red hot in June and July.

Here's a funny O-Dog tidbit, he got his haircut before batting pratice yesterday. Once he got out of the shower he told his teammates "You guys are lucky to be playing with the best-looking man in baseball."

Boy I miss Hudson.

Bruce Wrigley - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 02:47 PM EDT (#152159) #

It probably goes against the grain to suggest this, but what about placing A.J. Burnett on waivers?

If the team had insuperable payroll problems, this might work.  Two problems - really bad optics for one, and royally pissing off a proud and sensitive player as well.  I don't see any major positives coming out of this, and a lot of potential negatives.

Mike Green - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 03:03 PM EDT (#152160) #
I miss Hudson too, but it's not really a career year for him.  The raw numbers fit in very nicely in his career line, and when you subtract the NL discount, he is actually a little below his career numbers.  He is still a fine, fine player.
Mike Green - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 03:23 PM EDT (#152163) #
With Zobrist and B.J. Upton being recalled from Durham and J.P. Howell getting the start today against Justin Verlander, the future is beginning to arrive in Tampa.  They've still got work to do- Jorge Cantu does not belong at second base-but they're on the right track.  They've got the core of a great offence, like the Indians of the mid-80s, but need to develop some pitching in order to win.  The Indians didn't until after that core (Brett Butler, Joe Carter, Julio Franco, Tony Bernazard, Mel Hall) was long gone.
Leigh - Tuesday, August 01 2006 @ 09:47 PM EDT (#152190) #
a lot of potential negatives.

Such as losing one of the top twenty starting pitchers in the majors.
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, August 02 2006 @ 10:42 AM EDT (#152219) #
"Such as losing one of the top twenty starting pitchers in the majors."

A.J. Burnett is not one of the top twenty starting pitchers in the majors.  I think you'd have trouble arguing he's in the Top 50.

He'll be 30 in January, but will has only started 30+ games in a season once, and only 2 other times has he cracked 20.

He's 2-5 this year on a great hitting team.  He's 51-55 lifetime.  He's had some decent ERAs, but collected those in a non-DH league in a pitcher's park.  He's never had an ERA+ over 125.   Excluding this year, his career ERA+ is 110.

He's a slightly league average pitcher, with the potential to be very good.  But that's all it is - potential, and like me, he's approaching the wrong side of 30.

Deadline Day | 134 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.