Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
That wasn't the best way to begin The Most Important Homestand of the Season.

Ten games in ten days. On July 24, the Blue Jays depart for the west coast, while GM Ricciardi considers his options:

To buy or not to buy - that is the question
Whether 'tis smarter in the end to decline
The waste and flotsam at outrageous prices
Or to find arms among this sea of refuse
And by obtaining, beat them - to buy, to spend
It all - and having spent, we may find naught
But heartache, and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to.


Ten games in ten days. It should go something like this:

Fri 14 July - Seattle (Meche) at Toronto (Janssen)
Sat 15 July - Seattle (Moyer) at Toronto (Halladay)
Sun 16 July - Seattle (Hernandez) at Toronto (Burnett)
Mon 17 July - Texas (Koronka) at Toronto (Lilly)
Tue 18 July - Texas (Padilla) at Toronto (Marcum)
Wed 19 July - Texas (Millwood) at Toronto (Janssen)
Thu 20 July - New York (Mussina) at Toronto (Halladay)
Fri 21 July - New York (Wright) at Toronto (Burnett)
Sat 22 July - New York (Wang) at Toronto (Lilly)
Sun 23 July - New York (Ponson) at Toronto (Marcum)

The Red Sox and Yankees also play Seattle during this period. The Yankees are currently hosting the White Sox - Seattle comes to the Stadium for three before the Bombers come to Toronto. The Red Sox have two more with Oakland before the Royals come to Fenway. Boston then heads west to play Seattle.

The Texas series scares the crap out of me - Marcum will be making his first major league start, which is never reassuring, and Casey Janssen may have turned back into a pumpkin. In his last six starts, Janssen is 1-5, 8.64 - in 25 IP he's allowed 44 H, 24 R, 24 ER, 9 BB, 12 Ks. Any way you look at it, he's certainly filling the void that Josh Towers left. The Rangers roughed him up pretty badly down in Arlington. As for Lilly - if the Jays score four runs, he'll win. If they don't, he'll lose. Lilly is 7-1 when the Jays score four runs or more, and he's 1-7 when they score three runs or less.

Since time immemorial, the Yankees have won the AL East. Boston always finishes second, but take the Wild Card for their troubles. And the Blue Jays come in third. This is The Way it has Always Been, with the exception of the Season From Hell.

It was my belief that 2006 would be the year that all of this would change. One of the Beasts of the East would fall, the Blue Jays would finish second with about 90 wins... but that wouldn't be enough to take the Wild Card, which for once would not come out of the AL East. I didn't just say these reckless things here - I even repeated them to the Toronto Star before the season started (and after looking it up to find the link, I discover I also said I was "very, very excited about Francisco Liriano" and "Bonderman and Verlander just might explode on the league." Gosh. I'm usually much more... wrong.)

Anyway... I still think one of the Beasts must fall and Toronto will finish second and not make the Wild Card. I want to be stubborn about this! However, it's unlikely to happen the way I thought it would. I originally thought it would be Boston that would stumble. They had some fairly obvious question marks going into the season - an entirely new infield, one starter I wouldn't trust to be good (Clement), another I wouldn't trust to be healthy (Beckett), two more old enough to fall apart at any moment (Schilling and Wakefield) and a black hole at the top of the bullpen. But the infield came together brilliantly. No one, absolutely no one expected Mike Lowell to play this well. His contract was the real price Boston paid to acquire Josh Beckett. Jon Papelbon solved their biggest bullpen problem, and the two old guys and the injury-prone guy have made all their starts.

There's more good news for the Red Sox. They have a terrific record at Fenway (27-12, .692) - that's the third best home record in the AL - and Boston has more home games remaining than any team in the AL. Like just about everyone, they'll be looking for another starting pitcher. The fifth spot in the rotation has been a revolving door all season. Matt Clement is injured, and was pretty bad before he got hurt. Jon Lester is 4-0, 2.89 but he's walked 25 guys in 37.1 IP and he won't keep winning if he keeps doing that. And if anything happens to Schilling or Ramirez, all bets are off. But for now, the Sox look pretty good to me.

Which brings us to the Bronx Bombers. I think a little respect for Joe Torre would not be out of line at this point. People who follow the Yankees complain incessantly about Torre's bullpen management, and his tendency to play favourites. To which, I would point out that people who follow any team closely complain incessantly about their manager's bullpen management and tendency to play favourites. That's what managers do. It will be pointed out that Torre is running a $200 million team, but just because Alex Rodriguez makes twice as much money as Scott Rolen doesn't mean he actually produces twice as much as Scott Rolen. The Yankees have to spend a lot of money because they spend so much of it stupidly, tossing it down black holes like Carl Pavano, where it disappears into a gravity well of nothingness and is never seen again.

Despite all the money they threw around, the Yankees found themselves short of starting pitching. Torre's response to wheel out the three guys he trusted (Mussina, Wang, and Johnson) every fifth day come hell or high water, and plug in whatever arms were lying around as necessary. The Big Unit hasn't been very good, but Mussina and Wang have delivered, and one of the Other Arms - the much-maligned Jaret Wright - actually seems to be asserting himself as the fourth starter (Wright has been better than Johnson, anyway.) The bridge between the starters and Rivera - Farnsworth, Proctor, Myers, Villone - has been adequate. Only three AL teams have given up fewer runs than the Bombers. The Yankees pitching has been a pleasant surprise.

The problem is on offense, and everybody knows what happened there - the long-term loss of Sheffield and Matsui. I haven't made a chart in a long time. Let's see if I can still manage...







Sheffield was originally hurt on April 29; Matsui went down two weeks later. Sheffield returned to the lineup briefly, but hasn't played since the end of May. The offense has been in decline ever since. Melky Cabrera is not the solution, Aubrey Huff has already been moved, and when Brian Cashman inquires about Bobby Abreu, the first words out of Pat Gillick's mouth will be "Philip Hughes." The Yanks are reported to be inquiring about Jeromy Burnitz and Craig Wilson.


TDIB Saturday: Here We Go | 25 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
ken_warren - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 09:53 AM EDT (#150730) #
Glaus at 3B, Hill at SS, and Adams at 2B.  Now that's one heck of a defensive infield.  Every play an adventure.  How can the Jays really expect to be taken seriously.  Then you consider Downs (5.14), Tallet (5.92), and Schoenweiss (5.76) as the middle relievers.  Are these guys really better than Frasor (3.25 in 2005) and Chulk (3.88 in 2005).  Of course 2005 was when the defense actually played defense (outside of Adams anyways).

Anybody have any idea what the Blue Jays were offering for Lopez and Kearns.  I guess if  the Reds were adamant about getting relief pitching they wouldn't be particularly interested in dealing with the Blue Jays.  Maybe Spier & League.

Dr. Zarco - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 10:11 AM EDT (#150732) #
I generally like Gibbons's pinch hit strategy, but last night I really didn't. 2nd and 3rd (after a bunt by Adams, which I also wasn't nuts about) with 1 out.

Frankie C due up against the lefty Sherill. Soriano warmed up in the pen. The options were Frank/Sherill or Molina/Soriano. Frank just doesn't strike out that much and slaps the ball all over the field, when just a single would do.

Instead, Gibbons chooses Molina against a guy who throws 98, not exactly Bengie's forte. This was a first guess on my part too, I didn't like it before the guessable K.

That, and of course the gimme DP off Sexon's bat in the first that Hill booted, were the two biggest plays of the game.
Pepper Moffatt - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 10:44 AM EDT (#150733) #
You're worried about infield defense and you want to pick up Felipe Lopez, the worst defensive shortstop in the National League?
Chuck - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 11:01 AM EDT (#150734) #
Instead, Gibbons chooses Molina against a guy who throws 98, not exactly Bengie's forte.

Especially a right-handed guy who throws 98. Not only entering into a poorer matchup (Soriano/Molina vs. Sherril/Catalanotto), by pinch-hitting Molina when he knew a RHP (and a very good) one would come in to face him, Gibbons both took away the opportunity to PH Molina against a LHP (though that situation never arose) and he forced Mottola into a game that figured to end with Seattle throwing RH pitchers.

On other frustrating fronts, Hill continued to make his case to be the starting 2B next season (the new starting SS presumably on somebody else's roster), and Glaus continued his struggles, seemingly hell-bent on refusing to adjust his approach.

It appears that we weary fans shall continue to be taxed. What fresh hell does today bring?
Alex Obal - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 11:16 AM EDT (#150735) #
It's worth mentioning that George Sherrill is quite adept at making lefties look really bad. They're batting .119/.240/.119 off him in 49 PA, and of those 49, 16 have struck out. And if ESPN's splits do not lie, he's struck out 29 of 93 before this year while walking zero (with two HBPs).

The only way to really guarantee yourself one platoon edge during that inning would have been pinching Bengie for Russ. That forces the Mariners' hand. They can bring in Soriano then (but deal with him facing Cat and Zaun), which gives a very good chance at a double play or an unproductive out but gives Gibbons the edge with Cat and Zaun. Or they can leave Sherrill in for one unfavorable matchup (righties hit him at a .275/.412/350 clip) but guarantee that Cat and Zaun face a lefty. I do think batting Bengie would have been the best play in a sea of bad options but it's completely understandable that Gibbons stayed away from the double play.

Hopefully Gibby does what he can to avoid batting Adams, Cat and Zaun 8-9-1 to stay out of situations like that.
Alex Obal - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 11:18 AM EDT (#150736) #
Err, make that 9-1-2.  D'oh.
Chuck - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 11:24 AM EDT (#150737) #
The only way to really guarantee yourself one platoon edge during that inning would have been pinching Bengie for Russ.

I agree. Had a move to Molina resulted in Soriano, Gibbons still would have had the option to PH McDonald for Molina and bunt anyway, as he did with Adams.
Named For Hank - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 01:40 PM EDT (#150738) #
Then you consider Downs (5.14), Tallet (5.92), and Schoenweiss (5.76) as the middle relievers.  Are these guys really better than Frasor (3.25 in 2005) and Chulk (3.88 in 2005).

Seems unfair to compare someone's 2006 numbers to someone else's 2005 numbers, doesn't it?  Why not compare what both groups are doing this year?
DepecheJay - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 01:46 PM EDT (#150739) #
Agreed with NFH.  Frasor and Chulk have been a mess this season and they've been given numerous chances.  Thank God JP doesn't put much stock in 2005 performance when we're looking at a team that's only 4.5 games back of first and STILL HAS A GREAT SHOT AT THE PLAYOFFS.

Lately I've seen a ton of people seemingly giving up and claiming that "2007 is the year J.P. wants to win!"  Sorry, but that's crap.  For all we know, 2007 could be a repeat of the Season From Hell (TM) and there goes JP's job!  The Jays have an EXCELLENT opportunity staring them in the face and people want to think about NEXT YEAR?  The Red Sox (up until this recent tear, which they appear to be coming down from) and the Yanks have looked less than impressive this season and it would appear the Jays have a chance this year.  Who knows, a few deadline deals for arms and the Jays could be in for a nice stretch run.

I just hope that JP doesn't share the same mentality that some Jays fans do, that's all.

ken_warren - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 02:28 PM EDT (#150741) #
You're worried about infield defense and you want to pick up Felipe Lopez, the worst defensive shortstop in the National League?

Definitely.

a)  It moves Hill back to 2B where he is actually quite good.

b)  It gets Adam's defense off the field altogether

c)  It replaces Adam's bat with Lopez's

What's the downside?  Other than the fact that Lopez was Gord Ash's guy and Adams is JP's guy.
Pepper Moffatt - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 03:28 PM EDT (#150742) #
"What's the downside?  Other than the fact that Lopez was Gord Ash's guy and Adams is JP's guy."

Heh.. I'm about the last person on this site that could be accused of being a JP apologist.  But there's a whole lot of downside here.

"a)  It moves Hill back to 2B where he is actually quite good. b)  It gets Adam's defense off the field altogether"

You'd get the exact same impact if you moved Hill back to 2B and Adams to SS.  Lopez is a worse defensive infielder than Adams.  Russ makes more errors, but he also gets to a whole lot more balls than Lopez does.   At best it's a wash, but I'd take Adams D over Lopez's."

"c)  It replaces Adam's bat with Lopez's"

That I'll give you.  But it still doesn't help the D.  And it's not like Lopez was placed on waivers.  You'll have to give something up for him, likely bullpen help.  Toronto's bullpen is already bad enough.  Why would you want to make it worse?


AWeb - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 04:12 PM EDT (#150744) #
If that isn't a clear statement that the Jays are looking for a SS, I don't what is. MacDonald just can't be the starter on a contending team. No amount of defense, and it's not like MacDonald is the greatest defensive SS in the league, can make up for a .600 OPS. He has to hit .290 like he did last year just to be remotely helpful overall. So who are the Jays after?
rtcaino - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 04:26 PM EDT (#150745) #

Just a gut reaction to the infield move: Does anyone else think that JP and Gibby have been messing around with things too much. Pitchers up and down, Hill getting flip flopped back and forth. I just don't feel that they have maximized their personnel’s potential. And I think that Hill has the talent to be a good player at short. He's young and patience is required with young players.

I just think that yanking pitchers up and down makes it hard to get in a groove, making young guys switch positions too much mid season can't be good for their development, and does no one in the organization realize that Zaun can hit righties better than Molina? While the first two points are arguable, I feel like I’m taking crazy pills every time Molina starts against righties.

That said some of the moves they have made have been necessary, such as dropping Towers. So where do you draw the line? It’s just frustrating when it doesn’t seem that they team is putting the best players on the in the best situations to win games.

The handling of the good ship loogy is the most frustrating! In 60 at bats, lefties have a .570 OPS against him. In 53 at bats, righties have a .920!!! Given that, why is he facing right handed batters almost as much as lefties? It makes no sense.

And it seems very often that he is facing righties in games where we are still in it. I can’t recall a specific incidence, but I know there has been more than a couple times where the loogy is facing 2 or 3 good righties in a row in situations where we are only down by two runs in the 6th. 

I mean I recognize that he may not be thrilled about being a loogy, and in mop up situations it is nice of Gibby to let him face righties. However, in winnable games, he should almost never face a righty; and even then, very very rarely.

So I get upset. I do. And than, every now and again I read something like this: “we're looking at a team that's only 4.5 games back of first and STILL HAS A GREAT SHOT AT THE PLAYOFFS.” And I feel a bit better. Thanks D-Jay… Though we could be in a better position I think.

dan gordon - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 07:15 PM EDT (#150746) #

and does no one in the organization realize that Zaun can hit righties better than Molina? While the first two points are arguable, I feel like I’m taking crazy pills every time Molina starts against righties

This has been a problem for quite a while now, and it looks like they may finally be doing something about it.  The last 3 times they've faced a righty, Zaun has been the starter (2 games vs KC and yesterday).  Let's hope it continues.

I see Chulk is back up, Taubenheim DL'd with a staph infection (is this the new team disease?).  The rotating bullpen continues.

Ron - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 08:47 PM EDT (#150750) #
I hope Russ Adams is mentally tough because it can't be easy to move from SS to 2B and now discovering you lost your starting job to career utility man John McDonald.

Just a few weeks ago, JP said Adams was still a big part of the Jays plans. This move contradicts his statement.

I have a feeling you won't see Adams in a Jays uni next season.

js_magloire - Saturday, July 15 2006 @ 11:30 PM EDT (#150755) #
This discussion covers a lot, and I know part of Hinske's problem is not dragging down the offence, and his bat has done good this year - so far - but let's give some credit, not to his defensive adjustment per se, but for his now 5th amazing diving catch, not missing one of them, and at least a few of them have been important in game situations. And I don't think it's mostly (maybe a tiny winy bit) because of his lack of range, because he's not a slow guy. Now he has to perfect the catches going at the wall.
zeppelinkm - Sunday, July 16 2006 @ 08:08 AM EDT (#150772) #

I think it is entirely because of his inferior range. Rios can just run those balls down. The difference between a diving grab and a running catch is just a step (or two at most). But yes, definitely Kudos to Hinske for getting to them, and keeping them in his glove.

Anyone else think Wells has looked much more human in center field this year? Obviously last season with zero errors is not a very comparable season, but it seems like he's misplayed his fair share of balls this year.

 

 

 

CeeBee - Sunday, July 16 2006 @ 09:13 AM EDT (#150774) #
One other factor is reading the ball off the bat and I'm willing to bet that a long time outfielder like Wells gets a way better jump on most balls than a first year outfielder. Some players never develop that skill but I think Hinske is slowly gaining experience and will get even better in the outfield with time.
Craig B - Tuesday, July 18 2006 @ 09:19 AM EDT (#150833) #

I have a feeling you won't see Adams in a Jays uni next season.

I have that feeling too, although I've had those feelings before and they turned out to be wrong.  This move isn't about the future, though, just the absolute immediate present.  I don't doubt that the Blue Jays would still like Russ Adams to be part of their future plans, but ultimately it's up to Adams to show that he can handle the pressures of playing at the major league level.  He hasn't shown that this season, but it's certainly still possible.  The degree to which he has come apart in the last 12-13 months is alarming.

If I were the Jays I would definitely want Adams around to begin next season, because he's a gifted player who has a lot of potential - but right now his flaws are going to stand in the way of the team getting back in the thick of the race.  McDonald's been the better performer the whole season despite the disappearing bat and for that reason alone he should start.  Hill has certainly solidified the second base position - there's no question in my mind that it's the position he belongs at - so that reduces the middle infield "problem" a lot.

As others have said, I'm sure that the Jays are pursuing shortstops from other organizations.  "Shortstops" not including Felipe Lopez, who isn't much of a shortstop (nice hitter though) and had a very bad history with the organization.

Craig B - Tuesday, July 18 2006 @ 09:24 AM EDT (#150834) #

hey hey.. I certainly don't think Vernon is anywheres near playing BAD, it just seems like there has been a few plays this year that he's booted that he shouldn't have - and he really doesn't normally do that.

I'll tell you what though - V-Dub has improved his defensive play immeasurably in one respect, and that's playing the ball in front of him.  I don't know if he's anticipating the short ball better, or maybe playing in a step or two, but I think whatever the reason, he's finally embraced the idea that the team's better off is he's picking off two singles in front of him rather than one double behind him.  He is making plays on the 160' humpback liners that he never made in years previous.  That may be helping his ZR as well.

TDIB Saturday: Here We Go | 25 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.