Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
The Jay offence has been humming along in the first half of the season. It's time for a statistical look at the individual performances, and at some platooning decisions facing John Gibbons.


Balls have been leaving Rogers Centre (the Bandwidth Box?) real fast, and some unfamiliar names have been putting up gaudy numbers. So, we think that everyone is doing better than their career norms. Think again. Here are the current year and 3 year weighted average GPA (current year GPA is weighted directly with previous years, giving 2006 an effective weight of double 2004 and 2005; in Russ Adams' case, his September 2004 performance was given a weight of .15).

Player 1 year GPA 3 year weighted GPA
Johnson .318 .267
Hinske .305 .263
Wells .303 .274
Rios .302 .259
Zaun .301 .270
Catalanotto .301 .274
Overbay .279 .283
Glaus .269 .287
Hillenbrand .265 .263
Molina .243 .255
Hill .228 .236
Adams .199 .223

The team is performing above the 3 year norms, as a whole. Some of this is undoubtedly due to park effects. In Alex Rios' case, there is evidence of a broad-ranging improvement that in a player's 3rd year at age 25 is not entirely unexpected. Overall, the team's GPA can be expected to fall somewhat in the second half. However, the offence so far this year, unlike last year, has been underefficient, scoring fewer runs than would be expected from the team GPA. So, the expected decline in team GPA may not be noticed when the runs scored are tallied.

When Alex Rios returns to the lineup, a decision will have to be made about the use of Hinske and Hilenbrand in the DH slot. Here are the 1 year and weighted 4 year OBP/Slugging Percentages against right-handed pitchers. For the 4 year averages, I have weighted current year plate appearances or at-bats at three times the weight of 2003-05 PAs/ABs.

Player ! yr PA 1 yr OBP 1 yr slug 4 yr weighted PA 4 yr OBP 4 yr slug
Hinske 109 .394 .604 1574 .349 .454
Hillenbrand 204 .332 .469 1888 .333 .448

Hmm. 16 points of OBP, 6 point of slugging percentage, 1/2 the double play rate, and more speed on the bases if Hinske starts against a right-handed pitcher instead of Hillenbrand. As well, this approach will give John Gibbons a better tactical option when a right-handed pitcher starts and a LOOGY comes on to face Adams and later Catalanotto. Rather than pinch-hitting with McDonald for Adams and then Johnson for Catalanotto, Hillenbrand would be a valuable pinch-hitting weapon. It seems to me to be very difficult to argue against a platoon at the DH slot. This would not mean that Hillenbrand would not play against right-handed pitchers. Troy Glaus will need a day off every once in awhile, and Hillenbrand can play third. Alex Rios will need a day off every once in a while; Hinske has shown that he can play the outfield effectively, and Hillenbrand can DH on these occasions.

There has been similar discussion with respect to the use of Benjie Molina rather than Gregg Zaun against right-handed pitchers. Let's run the numbers against right-handed pitching:

Player 1 yr PA 1 yr OBP 1 yr slug 4 yr weighted PA 4 yr OBP 4 yr slug
Zaun 140 .396 .552 1181 .367 .443
Molina 141 .317 .379 1281 .311 .372

Wow. 56 points of OBP, 71 points of slugging percentage, and more speed on the basepaths and a lower double play rate. The only reasons to play Molina instead of Zaun against a right-handed pitcher are to give Zaun a rest if a number of them pitch in a row, and overwhelming preference on the part of a particular starter.

Many of John Gibbons' decisions to date have followed from his inclination to play the hot hand. Now that performances have begun to stabilize, a longer look back is valuable for planning usage patterns over the second half. There are some gains to be made that could help offset some modest declines that can be reasonably expected to occur.

A statistical look at the 2006 Jay offence in the first half | 27 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Gerry - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 11:37 AM EDT (#150296) #

Troy Glaus OPS by month:

  • April   .919
  • May  1.005
  • June  .739
  • July    .372

It appears that as Glaus goes, so goes the Jays.

Leigh - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 12:28 PM EDT (#150302) #
You make excellent cases for Zaun and Hinske, Mike G.

I wonder how large a role is played by cognitive dissonance (Molina must be better than Zaun, or we would not have signed him) in the decision to give more playing time to Molina than to Zaun.

Hinske is currently one of the better "tenth men" in the league; moving him into his rightful position as starting DH would make Hillenbrand a very valuable "tenth man".  Hinske over Hillenbrand is a slam-dunk no-brainer to me, but I also thought the same of Hee Seop Choi, Erubiel Durazo and Carlos Pena last winter - and they have all unequivocallly sucked at AAA - so what do I know?

Mike Green - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 12:45 PM EDT (#150304) #
The other factor, of course, is that Hinske is under contract for 2007 and Hillenbrand is a free agent after 2006.  I would have thought that the contract status factor would incline the same way as the statistical analysis in the DH playing time decision.
Chuck - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 12:54 PM EDT (#150305) #
I wonder how large a role is played by cognitive dissonance (Molina must be better than Zaun, or we would not have signed him) in the decision to give more playing time to Molina than to Zaun.

I, too, initially thought that this was the rationale for Molina seeing so many RHP. But when both Zaun and Molina are in the same lineup vs RHP, Zaun always gets the more favourable batting slot, presumably an acknowledgement of Zaun's superiority vs RHP. Gibbons must therefore be of the belief that Molina's defense is so strong that he merits the lion's share of playing time vs RHP, his weaker bat notwithstanding. It's not clear if that's cognitive disonance or just dubious decision-making.
Leigh - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 01:33 PM EDT (#150308) #
Leigh's Tenth Man Chart*
*Players selected on a subjective basis... the point of the chart is not to debate the identity or indeed the existence of the "tenth men", but to illustrate just how good Hinske (or, should rationality take hold, Hillenbrand) is - offensively and without regard to positional versatility - relative to his cohorts... I have listed Baseball Prospectus' preseason PECOTA Equivalent Average for each "tenth man", as well as each player's actual EqA to date and the average of the two... the dual listing and averaging enabled me to avoid having to choose between 'how good they are' and 'how well they have played', which are only partially correlated measures and accord with different tastes, respectively.

Tenth Men
 Player Team
PECOTA EqA
Actual EqA
Average
 Davanon Arz
.283
.273
.278
 Betemit Atl
.262
.269
.266
 Millar Bal
.281
.259
.270
 Pena Bos
.292
.290
.291
 Mackowiak ChW
.256
.275
.266
 Nevin ChC
.271
.256
.264
 Freel Cin
.251
.283
.267
 Hollandsworth Cle
.259
.256
.258
 Piedra Col
.262
.202
.232
 Infante Det
.252
.253
.253
 Helms Fla
.255
.258
.257
 Lane Hou
.279
.255
.267
 German KC
n/a
.301
n/a
 McPherson LAA
.294
.266
.280
 Cruz LAD
.278
.273
.276
 Gross Mil
.261
.284
.273
 Ford Min
.275
.227
.251
 Crosby NYY
.249
.212
.231
 Chavez NYM
.238
.259
.249
 Kielty Oak
.276
.275
.276
 Dellucci Phi
.295
.297
.296
 Wilson Pit
.287
.286
.287
 Bellhorn SD
.266
.247
.257
 Bloomquist Sea
.238
.243
.241
 Sweeney SF
.278
.263
.271
 Luna StL
.234
.273
.254
 Branyan TB
.274
.272
.273
 Botts Tex
.281
.257
.269
 Hinske Tor
.270
.310
.290
 Anderson Was
.232
.257
.245
Craig B - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 02:14 PM EDT (#150315) #
We park-adjust the GPAs on the THT website, yes.
ken_warren - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 03:59 PM EDT (#150321) #
Something that needs to be taken into account is BAPIP.  With such a few number of bats wild random fluctuations are quite likely.

 Zaun 32.7, Molina 29.9.

Zaun's BAPIP has been 26, 24, 31, & 28 for the past four seasons so his current level is not realistic.  I also suspect that their OPS for last season (Zaun .728 & Molina .782) is a major consideration in Molina's additional playing time, not to mention his bigger contract.

With regard to Hinske vs Hillenbrand I assume that past history is still playing a role in Gibbons' thinking.  Hinske's OPS for the past three seasons is .739 while Hillenbrand's is .795.   I'm not sure the Blue Jays should assume that this difference is no longer applicable based on 114 platoon-aided AB for HInske this season.
Magpie - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 04:12 PM EDT (#150325) #
With regard to Hinske vs Hillenbrand I assume that past history is still playing a role in Gibbons' thinking.

Well, certainly not their past history in hitting RH pitchers. Here's what they did in 2005, when Hillenbrand was an All-Star and Hinske was everybody's whipping boy:

vs RHP     AB     R       H      2B     3B    HR     RBI     BB    HBP   SO   SB  CS     AVG    OBP    SLG   OPS
Shea        434    60    121    25       2     11       60      20     19     61     3    1    .279    .336    .422    .758
Dude       389    66    110    29       2     11       55      42      7      89     7    4    .283    .358    .452    .810
AWeb - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 04:29 PM EDT (#150326) #
Hinske in the last week: 11/23, 3 doubles, 2 triples, 3 HR, 5 walks. Plus several great catches in the outfield. Prior to this last week: .253/.340/.429. Now, I think Hinske has done a great job, and the last week shouldn't be disregarded entirely (most players' stats look a lot worse when you remove the best stretch), but it's clear he's just in a hot streak. With 100ABs, the overall numbers spike, and we all like him more. I've been kiddingly calling him the greatest in the game chats, but I don't really think he's the best hitter on the team. If he keeps it going at a good (maybe .300/.375/.500) level until Rios returns, then maybe think about finding him more full-time work. But be ready to deal with angry/slumping Hinske again. It will happen, even if he has actually improved this year. The good news to me is that he's shown himself to be a capable backup outfielder; the Jays don't have many lying in wait in the system that look any better.

As a reminder, last year, he started hot. Very hot. After 8 games, .407/.467/.778, 1 double, 3 HR, 2 BB. And we got our hopes up.
ken_warren - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 04:45 PM EDT (#150328) #
With regard to Hinske vs Hillenbrand I assume that past history is still playing a role in Gibbons' thinking.

Well, certainly not their past history in hitting RH pitchers. Here's what they did in 2005, when Hillenbrand was an All-Star and Hinske was everybody's whipping boy:


vs RHP     AB     R       H      2B     3B    HR     RBI     BB    HBP   SO   SB  CS     AVG    OBP    SLG   OPS
Shea        434    60    121    25       2     11       60      20     19     61     3    1    .279    .336    .422    .758
Dude       389    66    110    29       2     11       55      42      7      89     7    4    .283    .358    .452    .810


I don't disagree with you.  But I don't think JP and especially Gibbons see it that way.  They seem to like Hillenbrand more than is warranted, and his usual hot start did nothing to change that.
Mike Green - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 05:33 PM EDT (#150329) #
Craig, I may be wrong, but I believe the THT park adjustments to GPA are based on prior year home/road statistics.  Rogers Centre was unusually favourable to hitters in the first half of 2006.
Mike D - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 05:38 PM EDT (#150330) #

Well, it wasn't his usual hot start.  On April 16, he was hitting .214/.255/.310.  By June 4, he had pulled up his line to .352/.382/.575.  Today, he's down to .305/.347/.480, primarily because of a sudden power outage; 14 of his last 16 hits are singles.  He seems to be playing in a funk generally; his glove has been atrocious.  It's probably coincidental, but he's a D-Ray and Yankee killer, and he hasn't faced either club in a while.

Those six weeks in late April and all of May may indeed have swayed Gibbons more than was warranted.  Don't you hate it when bad hitters conceal how bad they really are with excellent hitting?

Sarcasm aside, Leigh's point is an important one:  The Jays have a great 10th bat (and great 11th and 12th bats, too).  Let's be thankful the team can trot out such serviceable veterans when injuries like Rios' occur.  Anyway, what is for many Sweet Nirvana -- i.e., a Hillenbrand-free lineup -- is around the corner with Shea's three-game paternity leave starting tomorrow night.   Hinske, Johnson and Cat will get all the playing time they want, and then some.

Mike Green - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 05:54 PM EDT (#150332) #
Hillenbrand is far from a bad hitter.  He's a valuable complementary player.  So is Hinske.  I am advocating  that they share duties upon Rios' return to take advantage of the platoon possibilities, in the same way that Catalanotto and Johnson are. 

As it happens, Hillenbrand's paternity leave comes at a difficult time for the team, due to Rios' illness.  It is shocking that babies have a way of appearing on their own schedules!

Magpie - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 06:02 PM EDT (#150333) #
Hillenbrand is also one of the team's three best hitters against LH pitching (his ability to punish southpaws is the main thing that separates him from Hinske). The other two are Rios (out with an injury) and Glaus (mired in a Slump.)

The Royals have two lefties ready for this series. Great.

dan gordon - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 06:09 PM EDT (#150334) #

Zaun's BAPIP has been 26, 24, 31, & 28 for the past four seasons so his current level is not realistic. 

If there is no reason to think a sudden improvement has a real cause other than random deviation from the norm, then you'd expect the player to revert to his normal level.  That may be the case with Zaun, but I don't believe it is.  This offseason he went on a serious conditioning program, and was extremely dedicated to improving his game.  You can even see the difference - he looks more muscular than he did before.  When there is a plausible reason to account for a sudden improvement, then I think you have to think it might be sustainable.  Remember, this is a guy who has had significant problems in his past which affected his play.  He appears to have all of the baggage behind him, and may, in fact now be more than making up for his past problems.  At his age, and being a catcher, he certainly shouldn't be playing 140 games a year, but I think he deserves a chance to play significantly more than the (roughly) 2 games a week he is getting now.  I think the amount of playing time for Molina and Zaun should be reversed, with Molina starting against all LHP and the occasional RHP when they play against several in a row.  The Molina contract shouldn't be determining his playing time. 

Mike D - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 06:11 PM EDT (#150335) #
I agree with you, Mike G, and I agree with your recommendations.
AWeb - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 06:11 PM EDT (#150336) #
Perhaps "outplayed platoon mate" is a repeatable skill? If being put in a platoon with Hinske has a consistent effect (as per Rios in April), Hillenbrand could have the greatest half of his career, by far. Then we could platoon Hinske with Glaus for a few weeks, to get him snapped out of it.

Actually, all of the platoon-mates on this team have performed incredibly well, and not always just against their "half" of the pitchers. Rios, Hinske, Catalanotto, Johnson, Zaun, Molina. Clearly, we need more platoons. Go to the 7 man staff (with daily Syracuse movements, kind of like the first half anyway), and platoon everyone else. I haven't worked out who we get for platoons yet, but that's what JP is for.
Ron - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 06:18 PM EDT (#150337) #
I just wonder how much trade value Hillenbrand has. If Shea were traded to the Padres, he would be tied for team lead in HR. They have a sinkhole at 3B with Vinny Castilla gobbling up AB's with a horrific line 236/.266/.329

Scott Linebrink would sure look good in the Jays bullpen.

I would glady flip Hillenbrand and a pitching prospect for Linebrink.
Bruce Wrigley - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 07:50 PM EDT (#150344) #

Yeah, Ron, I see your point - the Padres need a bat and even if know they'd be nutty to deal their best and most reliable reliever (after Hoffman) in the middle of a hot pennant race to take on a much larger contract like Hillenbrand's, the fact remains that there aren't a lot of "sellers" out there and the Padres don't have a lot of chips to cash in anyway.

I like the idea in principle.  It might be worthwhile, while the Jays are at it, to sweeten the deal by offering to take back Castilla.  His flyball-hitting style suits the Rogers Centre about 1000% better than PETCO and he plays a better third base than anyone on the Jays' roster, even at 39.  If not Castilla, maybe Geoff Blum - does anyone know if Blum can play second base anymore?

ken_warren - Thursday, July 06 2006 @ 09:11 PM EDT (#150348) #

Zaun's BAPIP has been 26, 24, 31, & 28 for the past four seasons so his current level is not realistic. 

If there is no reason to think a sudden improvement has a real cause other than random deviation from the norm, then you'd expect the player to revert to his normal level.  That may be the case with Zaun, but I don't believe it is.

BAPIP is more of a measure of luck than skill.  Variations from a players normal level are not sustained, both negative and positive.
Bruce Wrigley - Friday, July 07 2006 @ 09:09 AM EDT (#150354) #

BABIP for hitters is fairly well skill-correlated especially at larger sample sizes.  So I understand, and so I believe.

By the way, when I say "Take back Castilla" above, I mean Linebrink and Castilla.

A statistical look at the 2006 Jay offence in the first half | 27 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.