Johnson will likely continue in his current role platooning with Frank Catalanotto in LF, backing up the CF & RF, pinch hitting against left handers, and serving as a late inning defensive replacement.
Johnson will likely continue in his current role platooning with Frank Catalanotto in LF, backing up the CF & RF, pinch hitting against left handers, and serving as a late inning defensive replacement.
http://oursportscentral.com/services/releases/?id=3245269
And random fact of day - Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Arizona are the only 4 US States that meet at the same point.
OK, I usually bite my tongue when people misuse the concept of a "replacement player" but I gotta draw the line here. Sorry, VBF, it's not you (I don't mean to pick on you), it's almost everybody.
The "replacement player" is the imaginary player who can be plugged into a role at zero cost. In MLB terms, the best example of replacement players are six-year minor-league free agents who will sign two-way deals for the major league minimum. Young players who aren't good enough to crack a major league lineup are another source of "actual replacements", but in fact these players aren't the best example because the pool is very limited - for pitchers, there's almost always some young player on the 40-man who can be slotted in, but for position players there often isn't. For pitchers, if you add up what Scott Downs, Chad Gaudin, Brandon League, Dustin McGowan, Matt Whiteside, Shaun Marcum and Justin Miller did, you get "replacement level" (a 5.97 ERA, if you do the accounting, which is just about typical in a league with an ERA around 4.50 - the AL had a 4.35 ERA). As I say, it's much harder for hitters but you get the general idea.
There is no way that Reed Johnson is a "replacement player". He's just about an average major leaguer with the bat, and his defense is quite valuable (though not at a key defensive position).
He is way, way better than the replacement level - on the open market, he would probably command a little more than what the Jays are paying him based on performance. Net Win Shares Value (get your copy of the THT Annual 2006 today, including NWSV calculations for every major leaguer!) has him worth over $1.9 million last year.
Or is the plan to have Gross and Johnson both on the roster, and use them to stack the lineup against RHP and LHP appropriately? Gross/Rios and Cat/RJ platoons would probably produce above average players.
Think Andy Dominique or Brian Lesher.
As far as im concerned Sparky can be a Jay for a long, long time.
I know Toronto has received crap hitting from Rios, but his defense is top notch (if and when he hits better, he'll be considered a GG candidate), and he's very young. Batista is valuable, especially so with this off-season's FA market (hello, Loaiza, hello!).
What am I missing here? I am not thinking they'd get Teixiera with that package, but that deal only makes sense without the prospect's being even C+ grade and/or with a young guy also going back to the Jays.
I dislike trading a super young guy without receiving one back in a challenge trade type format.
My initial thought is that someone will claim him. However, I can't imagine that the Jays didn't see the situation coming (a crowded 40 man roster) so it means that they don't think that highly of Gaudin and/or there's no trade value for him (or enough value in return in another trade to free up a spot on the 40 man) so perhaps he'll go unclaimed.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2245686
1. Hasn't done anything in the major leagues yet, but
2. Has all the potential in the world and
3. Is too young to give up on.
I hope nobody claims him.
Of course, that's very, very optimistic thinking. But he's got a ton of raw talent. I can at least see him settling into a setup role though, and having that as your setup would be quite nice too.
The Jays were 4th out of the 30 teams in baseball in Cost per Marginal Win in 2005, with a marginal payroll of $36,871,500 and 31.4 marginal wins, a cost of $1,174,252. Cleveland led baseball ($735,462 per marginal win) and Milwaukee was second, with Tampa and their ultra-cheap $29 million payroll just edging the Jays out for third. Oakland and Washington came 5th and 6th. The White Sox, the top playoff team, were 7th at $1,316,071.
The Yankees were 30th and last at $4,298,681, followed by the Royals and Dodgers.
I think that this metric shows just how efficient the Jays were at using their limited payroll in 2005.
In 2004, though, it was not so rosy... the Jays were 22nd although still ahead of the Red Sox and Yankees. The Indians were also 1st in this measure in 2004 followed by Tampa and Florida. The Twins and Cards were the best playoff teams in cost efficiency in 2004 (St. Louis were again the best NL playoff team in cost efficiency in 2005).
The moral of all this is obvious - the way to be cost-efficient is to use young players, good or bad.
If Kevin Cash's legacy vanishes without a ripple, I will be very upset.
I think .300 is a bit high for a "replacement level" but fairly reasonable in the context of what cost/marginal win is trying to do... a roster actually assembled out of all minimum-salary players would not in fact win 49 games but probably somewhat fewer, about 36. But in fact, teams don't have to assemble a team on the fly with all minimum guys at once, and a normal team, even a very bad one, will be able to build around some younger players on minimum salaries that have better than replacement-level talent.