Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Maybe it is better to suffer from what one knew than to expose oneself to new suffering. – Emile Zola.

Strange as it may seem, Zola was no pessimist. Or at least I don't think he was a pessimist. Now, Blue Jays fans in the last few years: they have a right to be a bit pessimistic about their bullpen, though this year's version has been fairly reliable. So maybe pessimistic is too strong. Lugubrious? Nah, too bombastic. Wait, here's the word, especially after last night's misery: pissed.

Not to cop out of doing a Game Report—in fact, I volunteered to take this one—but truthfully, what can be added? What statistical balderdash can I conjure from my arse? Magpie said it all in the Instant Replay: "Felix Friggin' Escalona? There are no words..."

Never one to hide my verbosity, however, I'll add a few words before letting Bauxites vent. My present palaver is not related to Miguel Batista's cruelty, but rather to what happened two weeks ago to the day in the Oakland Coliseum. The event I refer to is when Frankie Rodriguez, frustrated from a perceived bad call while throwing yet another breaking pitch, lazily dropped the return throw from the catcher, flat-out costing the Angels the ball-game as Nick Swisher, the winning run, dashed home with more flair than your average three-card monty dealer.

Though of course it's possible a hit could have scored Swisher anyway, it's easier—and much more fun!—to blame K-Rod. At once I said to myself, "The Angels are done. They're not going to recover from this loss." (At the time it put them a game behind the A's in the AL West, though they remained in first place in the wild card standings.)

However, since then it has been the A's who appear to have peaked: they have lost nine of 11 games, scoring 24 runs in the process, even losing two of three to the Royals. They are now three-and-a-half games behind the Angels, who have gone 7-4 since the K-Rod debacle, in the AL West, and are now a game behind the Yankees in the wild card race.

But the A's know something about how the Angels must have felt, and indeed how the Blue Jays must feel now. Back in late May, after the D-Rays torched Joe Blanton for 148 first-inning runs (the actual total may be lower, I'm having a tough time seeing thru the fog of fury) en route to a 183-0 shutout (please accept my apologies if I am exaggerating the figures), I was sure the A's were done. Granted, they were 190 games below .500 at the time (again, the actual number may differ from the one my memory has established), so that wasn't a great leap forward in the intellectual history of humanity. Just as it looked grim for the A's in late May, it looked grim for the Halos two weeks ago. But -- cliche alert! -- it's not over until it's over.

The Jays are not done. It may seem so after a brutal loss like the one last night, but given the small evidence I presented above, it is possible to come back from the dead.

For further evidence, I turn away from brutal endings which represent not an end but a new beginning, from Biblical stories of chaps named Lazarus, from long losing streaks that seem to never end but which eventually turn into winning streaks that seem to never end. Indeed, I present just two words for evidence that it's possible to be born again, and on more than one occasion:

Julio. Franco.

Yankees 5, Blue Jays 4: Worst. Blown. Save. Ever. | 31 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
The_Game - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 03:07 AM EDT (#126421) #
I'm back from my personal week suspension would I put on myself after the Jays lost last Monday to the Angels (which I felt was my fault), and it hasn't gone too well since I've been gone (2-5). I'll be back for tomorrow's game, and hopefully they can pull out a win with me back in the fold.

Now I'm thinking I shouldn't have put that suspension on myself because the Jays didn't do very well when I didn't write anything here. But I was out of town most of last week anyway, so I likely wouldn't have been able to get on much.
Magpie - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 03:42 AM EDT (#126422) #
You'll want to look at Wednesday's This Day in Baseball. A heads up!
Justin (T-Birds) - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 04:43 AM EDT (#126423) #
Heart-breaking loss, but at least it was exciting.

I just saw the replays of the game again, and the thing that jumps out is the pitch selection/execution of Batista. The 1-2 to Matsui caught way too much of the plate, and the 0-2 to Escalona was right down the middle. With those counts, he has to have better location to be effective, given that his pitches all seem to be between 86-96 mph.
Mazara - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 06:30 AM EDT (#126424) #
Despite that being probably the most exciting game of the whole season, I was completely enraged when Escalona (who?) drove that 0-2 pitch right back up the middle. First of all, what kind of pitcher throws an 0-2 pitch directly over the plate? Honestly, doesn't Batista (or Zaun) know the basic rules and tactics of trying to strike someone out?

However, even though Batista capped off his horrible season (I dont care what the numbers say, he's been awful) with another expected blown save -- that's not what made me mad. What did was how hard and the amount of effort you could see the Jays put into that final run. Rivera is without a doubt the greatest closer in the game, and the Jays still scratched out two well-earned hits off of him. Not to mention O-Dawg's great hustle to go 180ft in the span of about six seconds, bad hamstring and all. It breaks my heart to watch the highlights of that game after knowing it's final result, seeing Hudson hop around, pumping his fist in a mad-state of emotion after scoring the go-ahead run, not knowing that only moments later all his hard-work would prove meaningless.

Great game, and a great display of character by the Jays to give the Yankees the kind of trouble they did. It's too bad they have to have a complete joke of a closer to render all their accomplishments, meaningless.
Named For Hank - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 07:18 AM EDT (#126425) #
Great game, and a great display of character by the Jays to give the Yankees the kind of trouble they did. It's too bad they have to have a complete joke of a closer to render all their accomplishments, meaningless.

While I agree that Batista had a bad outing, I don't think he's been a "complete joke" this year. As Wilner pointed out last night, he's blown exactly one more save than Mariano Rivera, and Rivera is considered "automatic". Is the line between "automatic" and "joke" just one blown save?
Joe - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 08:40 AM EDT (#126427) #
"I don't care what the facts say. That guy sucks!"
sweat - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 08:41 AM EDT (#126428) #
I have to admit that I was more than a little worried when i saw Matsui's numbers were 6 for 10. I thought to myself, why wouldn't they have left Speier in for Matsui, given Batista's terrible numbers against him. When Batista got up 0-2, I stopped worrying. doh.
HoJu - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 09:05 AM EDT (#126429) #
I was thinking the same thing about leaving Speier in. But Matsui is 3-7 against Speier, not exactly a ringing endorsement for Justin either. The ideal situation would've been to have Schoeneweis(Matsui is 1-12 against him) available to face Matsui but obviously he had already pitched.
Craig B - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 09:13 AM EDT (#126430) #
Admittedly, though, Batista had a good start, which has kept his numbers looking good, and has been pretty bad since the beginning of June. I don't know if it's luck or a genuine slump, but I frankly think that some of his *good* luck from earlier in the season has caught up to him now.

I'd like to see him get some lower-leverage innings in the hope it will help his aggressiveness. He's been terrible at getting early strikes. TERRIBLE. Last night, after the Matsui homer, he became almost comically afraid of the hitters - he started the next four hitters 1-0, and then went 2-1 or 3-0 on all of them. Naturally, two of the four ended up walking.

That is the kind of thing that drives me completely mental. Especially from a Batista, who has real good stuff that is genuinely hard to hit. He went 1-0 on four of six hitters last night, and 2-1 or worse on four of six. Against Detroit on Saturday, he went 1-0 on two of the four hitters and 2-1 on one of three. Against Anaheim on the 17th, he went 1-0 on two of three and 2-1 on two of two. On the 16th against the Angels, he went 1-0 on two of four and 2-1 on one of three. Against Baltimore on the 14th, he went 1-0 on three of seven and 2-1 on three of six (counting the HBP on Tejada).

That's 11 first-pitch strikes to 24 hitters, which is *terrible* for a guy with his brand of stuff. That's 11 2-1 counts to 20 hitters, which again is simply brutal. I'm just guessing, but I'm pretty sure that no pitcher could be successful doing that long term.

I know that's a small sample size, but (from my memory) Batista's been doing this all season. I wouldn't be surprised if everyone's scouting report on him now is to take pitches early, let him dump himself in a hole, and wait for the four-seam fastball that he has to rely on to get strikes.
Craig B - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 09:17 AM EDT (#126431) #
These numbers are fairly typical, but they illustrate the importance of that first-pitch strike. When Batista goes 0-1 on a hitter, he has walked 4 and struck out 32 of 125 hitters. When he goes 1-0 on a hitter, he has walked 17 and struck out 8 of 114 hitters.
Mike Green - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 09:55 AM EDT (#126433) #
All this is heartbreaking, but not really surprising. Batista and Walker were not pitching as well as their ERAs would suggest early in the year; Schoeneweis and Speier were not pitching as poorly. The bullpen like the offence is essentially flat, but is performing at a much higher level than each of the last 3 years. For that I am very grateful.



Shortstop - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 10:22 AM EDT (#126434) #
Bad pitch selection by the Batista. He should have finished off the rookie, but missed with his location. Tough loss.

Espically since they had the bases loaded and 1 out in the 8th and couldn't get another run. It might have been one of the worst at bats i have ever seen Zaun have. I love the guy, but he was coming out of his shoes swinging by those fastballs/splitters in the 8th.

As for the worst save ever. I will have to say the opening day blown save by Mike Timlin a few years back against the White Sox. First ball fast ball to Noberto Martin and our day was ruined.
Cristian - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 10:26 AM EDT (#126435) #
Zaun's last month:

.212/.313/.282

The poor guy is gassed. Bring up Quiroz and give him some at bats for the rest of the season.
#2JBrumfield - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 10:34 AM EDT (#126436) #
Of course, hindsight is 20-20 but I had a bad feeling when Batista walked Jeter, especially when he was 2-for-16 lifetime against him. And I thought of "Paco" Martin immediately after Escalona's hit. I still have a sick feeling in my stomach. This reminds me of that game in 1999 when the Jays blew a 6-1 lead to Yankees at the Dome, pretty much dashing their play-off hopes that year.
Alexander - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 11:49 AM EDT (#126442) #
Ahahaha! Thank you gentlemen for tearing apart EVERY possible stat that you can. Again. You have brought a smile to my day!

Bottom line: and most of you know this already, but Im breaking it down for the ADHD types who dont have the patience go through pages and pages of statistics that may or may not matter.

-The Blue Jays need more power.
-The Blue Jays need to make better on
the basepaths.
-The Blue Jays need a fresh arm in the bullpen.
-The Blue Jays need a reliable closer.
-The Blue Jays need to outright Eric Hinske.

Damnit...where is Duane Ward when you need him. Wait...where is Duane Ward? I read this spring that he is attempting another comeback. Anyone know about this?

Cheers
King Rat - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 11:56 AM EDT (#126443) #
Well, I'd say that was about the most painful loss of the season.

A minor quibble with the Bill Simmons categorization-I think this game was a Stomach Punch, rather than a Guillotine Game. I cannot remember being as excited by a Jays' run this year as I was about the Hudson mad dash. And then the Yankees yanked the rug out from underneath me.

I don't want to sound defeatist, and I'll continue to watch and enjoy the Jays' game, but this is my stop on the Unofficial 2005 Jays' Playoff Bandwagon. That said, I think they're setting up very well for next year-I can hardly wait to see what happens.
Nigel - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 12:14 PM EDT (#126447) #
It's small consolation right now, but its these kinds of losses that make the victories that much sweeter. If you suffered through the crushing bullpen collapses in late August and early September of 1983 and then the 1985 season you know what I mean. It's corny but its true.
Craig B - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 12:41 PM EDT (#126453) #
Definitely! Nigel is right about this. The growing pains are part of the process for us as fans, just like 2004 was (much as I hate to admit it).
Nigel - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 12:49 PM EDT (#126454) #
For those of you who didn't follow the '83 season - go to Retrosheet and look at the week of August 22-28 just for a flavour of the crushing losses I'm talking about (there were a number of others). At the time the Jays were fighting for first place.
Jordan - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 12:55 PM EDT (#126455) #
If you suffered through the crushing bullpen collapses in late August and early September of 1983 and then the 1985 season you know what I mean.

I remember them all too well. Roy Lee Jackson, Joey McLaughlin Sr., Bill Caudill, Dennis Lamp (as closer), Gary Lavelle .... they were the necessary precursors to Tom Henke and Duane Ward. Blowing leads in must-win games is a rite of passage for a growing contender, as the Jays surely are.

Remember also that the pen has been solid pretty much all year, and is a major reason the Jays are even on the fringes of contention. Injuries in the rotation and a bevy of short starts finally caught up with the relievers -- you can't go into the Bronx with a rotation of Josh Towers, Gustavo Chacin, Dave Bush, Scott Downs and Dustin McGowan (total career starts: 202, 90 by Towers) and a tired bullpen and expect to leave with much more than your wallet.

This too shall pass, and there'll be better days ahead.

Ron - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 01:08 PM EDT (#126456) #
Why are so many Jay fans calling for Quiroz when he hasn't shown the ability to hit at the AAA level? And of course there's the small matter of actually recovering from his medical condition.

BTW I thought the Jays said they would try to run a lot more on the basepaths this season. The Jays are tied for 21st in the league with 51 stolen bases. And here's a stat that suprised me, the Jays are 7th in OBP in the majors and only behind the Yanks and Red Sox in the AL.
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 01:15 PM EDT (#126458) #
BTW I thought the Jays said they would try to run a lot more on the basepaths this season.

I think they fully intended to until they realized that they aren't any good at it. A 65% success rate is pretty bad.

The best base stealer for the Jays over J.P.'s reign has been Hinske, but he hasn't been on base a whole lot this year, which makes a difference as well.

Lefty - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 01:43 PM EDT (#126462) #
So can we assume Vernon was dreaming in technicolour with his pronouncement of a 30-30 season. Did Gibby reign him in or Wells just thought the better of it.

I think Vlady has deliberately run more as the season has progressed in order to punish opposing managers decisions to give him the free pass.

Nigel - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 01:49 PM EDT (#126465) #
Dreaming in technicolour. 30 SB's isn't on for Wells even with a full green light (unless he was prepared for about 15-20 CS's).
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 01:54 PM EDT (#126466) #
So can we assume Vernon was dreaming in technicolour with his pronouncement of a 30-30 season. Did Gibby reign him in or Wells just thought the better of it.

Heh. I remember that comment as well. I thought he'd be lucky if he got 15. Right now he's got 3 (and 3 CS).

I'd be interested to know if the Jays put the red light on Wells, or if Vernon has some leg muscle problem that prevents him running around like a madman. Or, as you say, maybe he just thought better of it.

Alex0888 - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 02:11 PM EDT (#126472) #
Batista can pitch AA New Hampshire for all I care
VBF - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 02:34 PM EDT (#126476) #
Thanks for the insight, Alex.
Rob - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 02:36 PM EDT (#126477) #
Thank you gentlemen for tearing apart EVERY possible stat that you can. Again. You have brought a smile to my day!

As we all know, there is only one statistic that can be used to judge pitchers, and it is blown saves. Shame on NFH for overloading us with useless statistics.

Batista can pitch AA New Hampshire for all I care

I was going to say "I don't mean to sound argumentative, but way to contribute to the discussion!" again, but VBF took care of it for me.

Named For Hank - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 04:42 PM EDT (#126494) #
Don't blame me, it was Wilner!

I'm just glad Alex doesn't manage the team.
Alexander - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 10:34 PM EDT (#126508) #
Ahahaha...Glad I could contribute!

*Alex looks forward to tonights post game report featuring a breakdown of Dave Bush's career third inning pitch selection versus dominican - born switch hitters under six foot one*

Oh God, please dont.

Cheers
A
Named For Hank - Wednesday, August 24 2005 @ 10:47 PM EDT (#126514) #
Alex, has anyone ever provided stats so asinine and useless as that here? What did you object to more, the breakdown of how the Jays performed in the clutch, or counting the number of saves Batista has blown?
Yankees 5, Blue Jays 4: Worst. Blown. Save. Ever. | 31 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.