*Alex looks forward to tonights post game report featuring a breakdown of Dave Bush's career third inning pitch selection versus dominican - born switch hitters under six foot one*
Oh God, please dont.
Cheers
A
Can anyone explain to me why Tony Womack is playing centre field for the New York Yankees?
My new baseball radio finally has a win. I was starting to think I'd have to return it. Also, just before the nine run inning, little Theo decided to take a mouthful of barley cereal and lean forwards and directly spew it into my chest -- he mushed his face around and smeared it all over my shirt -- so the two of us spent the entire rally sitting on the floor in our underwear. I'm hoping I won't have to spend every game in my underwear, but if I gotta I certainly will. At least tomorrow's game is a day game.
Let's hope that the Jays can continue to get lots of runs, but hopefully they can get runs in mor than one inning.
- When asked why isn’t there more bunting JP replied “bunting absolutely stinks” And then he said “it’s a lost art”
- Purcey will start at AA next season, Jackson will start at AAA next season
- Romero won’t be appearing with the Jays next September. He hopes he ends the season at AA or AAA.
- Says Wells is good at the 3 hole but Hillenbrand isn’t a 4 hole hitter.
- When asked if JF-Griffin or Arnold would be called up September 1st, he said they are still discussing who they will call up. Call ups will see action.
Nice little plug by JC tonight although I dont know why he mentioned bluejayway.ca first!!!! Just a testament to how great this website is so keep up the good work guys.
Probably the funny moment for me was when the commentating team said they could use these websites to help answer some of our questions about the Jays, and the entire time I thought, hmmm I'm doubtful that they can answer anything more than this comprehensive website already covers.
GO JAYS GO.
The team seems to score runs in bunches. I guess it's because they don't hit many home runs, but that's just a guess.
Anyone see Chacon's mug shot? Looks like they were sitting in the bullpen and some guy said "hey Shawn look over here"
Damn straight. This will actually be covered, in part, in tomorrow's Game Report, which I am happy to announce will feature no analysis of Dave Bush's pitch selection.
I'm also glad to hear Romero won't be rushed. If he follows Purcey's career path -- start his first full season at Dunedin, finish it at New Hampshire -- and handles himself as well as Purcey, the Jays ought to be pleased. I do expect Jackson and Purcey to see time in Toronto next year, however -- maybe as early as June or July for one or possibly both of them.
Shure. It's a natural-like progression. Earle Combs, Joe DiMaggio, Mickey Mantle, Bobby Murcer, Mickey Rivers, Rickey Henderson, Bernie Williams ... Tony Womack!
Voila!
Reminds me of the Boston Red Sox left fielder descent: Ted Williams, Carl Yastrzemski, Jim Rice, Mike Greenwell, Bob Zupcic.
Some of my best friends are Dave Berg.
There's a certain Bauxite's significant other who has a tenuous connection to royalty that would definitely beg to differ.
At least my wife likes Miguel Batista for his eyes.
I am glad the Jays had this great game last night, however, I believe the Yankees will win today, and the Jays will begin their "slide" as they do every year. I get so angry with them every year as the Season nears the end! They are so inconsistent, it hurts!!Batista has got to go!! Would Spier make a good closer?
I put NO bets on Chacin today - he gets flustered, and today will be the Jays demise, mark my words!
I will keep my fingers crossed! Nothing I would like better than to see the Yankees lose yet one more game!!
Does Miguel Batista have to go because he blew the save two days ago?
And I, too, was under the impression that the Jays usually turned it up in the final two months. I remember '02 and '03 having nice finishes to them.
MsBaseball looks like another short-termer -- the team was bad last year, Batista was bad yesterday, therefore both are bad. Not to pick on you, MsBaseball, but a lot of people show up and post things like this without support and then never come back -- Batter's Box is about conversation, not venting. You can surely believe what you like, but in talking about it here we'd either like to hear some support for what you say or to hear you ask questions. You say that Chacin gets flustered and therefore the team will lose today -- when did he get flustered? I'll counter with his spectacular Yankee Stadium game last year where he totally shut down a far better Yankees offense than he'll be facing today.
"Batista has to go" is just silly. Who do you want to replace him with, and why? Speier has been much better than last year, but isn't he more valuable in higher-leverage situations in the late innings of a game? And can he pitch as frequently as Batista? Batista isn't Eric Gagne or Mariano Rivera, but he doesn't stink, not by a long shot. But if you think he does, try to convince me -- tell me why he's so terrible that the team needs to jettison him.
Hey, you missed Bunny High, Whitey Witt, Jake Powell, Tuck Stainback, Joe Pepitone, Elliott Maddox, and Omar Moreno...
Wow, maybe it is a natural progression.
I agree that the Jays are a better Team this Season, a lot of fresh, young, and eager guys, and perhaps they will give us a better "show" next Season, but for this year, I truly believe it is too late. I am still, however, hoping they might get a Wildcard spot??
Again, I'm asking you where Chacin got flustered, and why Batista has to go.
Just the games in the comfort of your living room right? Although, if you were going to do it at the Rogers Centre it would be much more interesting!
Forget the fu-manchu mustache. Do the underwear thing!
;)
Love the site and all the attention to detail that you guys offer up.
I've been a Blue Jay fan since their inception but honestly my true fervor started in the 83 season when they won 89 games,with a better bullpen that year maybe they could have given Baltimore a run for their $.
I digress though.
I can see so much symmetry between that 83 team and this years squad.
Lots of promising rookies mixed in with some veteran leadership.
A recipe for success?I'm hoping.
Great game last night,with 2 outstanding grabs.
Bush was awesome and I think he could have been rattled if Vernon doesn't catch that ball.
Best offense always seems to be initiated by even better defense.
Gotta run but I look forward to adding my $.02 worth, constructively,in the days,wks to come.
Later..........
Also, Roy Halladay is not a huge strike out pitcher, but he was on pace for about 175 SOs this year, which is hardly chopped liver.
Josh Towers looks like he'll finish with about 100 SOs, and I think it's fair to say that he's not a strike out pitcher.
I also agree that the Team scores runs in bunches, and I am of the opinion that that is good!! Home runs are great, however, RBI's are the best!!
Chacin does well when no one is on base. He pitches faster and more accurately. My opinion is that he loses his concentration when he has to watch runners on the bases. He takes much longer to throw a pitch, which isn't always a bad thing, but he seems to be trying too hard, perhaps? Hence, he throws a lot of "balls"! The, I see him getting flustered!!
My opinion, of course!!
I think Roy is a great Pitcher, granted, he is NOT a strikeout Pitcher, but I think we might have a few more wins if he had been on the Roster the past 7 weeks. On the other hand, I think the Jays have done "quite well" in his absence!
Will Roy be back before the Season ends? What do you think?
I can empathize with the 'batista has to go' statement, but it really is just a case of him having had 2 bad outings in a row in an otherwise pretty good season. He has made some games interesting that fans probably would have rather he'd just come in and shut down, but if you look at the season as a whole he has generally done the job. I don't think he's had any more 'bad outings', or has a substantially higher percentage of 'bad outings' than any of our other relievers.
Batista's bad outings just stand out because it usually means they lose the game.
I certainly don't want to be reported for any ABUSE, so if I am out of line, or, seem to be "venting", I will accept the criticism, no problem!
While they certainly have been different in many ways, in the only way that makes a difference to the team's record they have been very similar. I'm not going to complain about, say, K rate or K:BB ratio if the job is being done. I wouldn't carp about a lack of home runs on a winning team.
I've said, mostly as a joke, that Batista could be the Jack Morris of closers -- meaning that he gets it done, but his numbers aren't great and he's regarded by many as "not as good as his record". I understand what "not as good as his record" means, and I can understand why someone would say that, but I really couldn't give a damn about it.
Also, Roy Halladay is not a huge strike out pitcher, but he was on pace for about 175 SOs this year, which is hardly chopped liver.
Josh Towers looks like he'll finish with about 100 SOs, and I think it's fair to say that he's not a strike out pitcher.
I was trying to make a ridiculous comparison, but the Towers one is definitely more accurate.
Batista didn't pitch last night. Chulk gave up some runs, but I think he was pitching very aggressively because of the score -- he wasn't concerned about giving up a few runs.
A few runs here, and a few runs there, especially the Yankees, makes for a very "nerve-wrecking" 8th and 9th innings!!
Batista has only actually lost a game 4 times this season. He has been shakey of late though, so perhaps had he pitched yesterday in a tied game they might have lost. But next week he might be back into the form he was in a couple of weeks ago.
Yes, he was rookie of the month in April. He was also rookie of the month in July. His ERA since the allstar break is 3.04 so I hardly think he's slowing down.
Chacin does well when no one is on base. He pitches faster and more accurately. My opinion is that he loses his concentration when he has to watch runners on the bases.
That's simply not true at all. Opposing batters are hitting .286 (.795 OPS, that's bad) with runners on base and .240 (.649 OPS, that's good) with runners on base. He actually pitches much better with runners on.
Opposing batters are hitting .286 (.795 OPS, that's bad) with no one on base and .240 (.649 OPS, that's good) with runners on base.
Chacin allows a slugging percentage of .440 with the bases empty, .348 with runners on, and just .283 with two or more runners on.
His walk and strikeout totals also go up in each situation, which pretty much confirms that Chacin knows how to pitch - he's trying to expand the strike zone with runners on base, prevent the big hit. A walk is as bad as a hit with the bases empty - but with runners on, it doesn't hurt as much.
He hasn't been too bad this season until very recently, but I don't see how this isn't an area on the team that can be improved for 2006.
Craig, in my 2005 NYY preview here on Batter's Box, I had Matsui already ahead of Keller, but the two of them were just fourth and fifth overall:
- Dave Winfield
- Roy White
- Bob Meusel
- Hideki Matsui
- Charlie Keller
Winfield's probably the lowest of those five players, to be honest with you - speaking strictly as a Yankee leftfielder. Winfield's three seasons in left for New York were 1981 to 1983. The team played poorly in 1982, Winfield failed to score 100 runs in any of the three seasons, and the '81 strike year was his best year hitting of the three but he went 1-for-22 in the World Series!
Meanwhile, in six years as the Yanks' starting LF, Keller went to World Series four times, and slugged *.611* in those games. It wasn't DiMaggio delivering the crushing blows in those Series - it was King Kong Keller. Winfield was putting up EqAs right around .300 from 81-83, but Keller's were like .330. Essentially, the difference between a Matsui and a Vladimir Guerrero. Except Keller was a bit better than Guerrero.
Purely as Yankee LFs, I'd rank them 1. Keller 1A. White 3. Meusel 4. Matsui 4A. Winfield. Matsui ranks ahead of Winfield, I think, because like Keller he's put up huge numbers in the clutch, performing his best in the postseason.
Lunch is almost over. Oh well.
Too bad, so Sad!!
We are talking about baseball, right?
I don't think we need to pile on during a rough part of the season and I love the great fans on this site that stick up for the Jays when people start jumping off the bandwagon, but... Miguel Batista has been the definition of mediocre (if not worse), since joining the Jays last season. Mariano Rivera is a potential Hall of Fame pitcher - Miguel Batista is not in the same universe as Rivera. Please, there are other ways to make an argument then to cherry pick stats that make Miguel look OK. Batista is certainly not an automatic loss, but 25/30 is really not that good. I think it was Rob who wrote an excellent piece a few days back about closers so there's not much to add, but please don't compare Batista to Rivera. I know what you're trying to say, but please - don't. In fact, I would not mind seeing Speier as closer next year. He has been far more effective than Batista. The whole "bottom line, he gets the job done" thing is the kind of argument made in the past for pitchers like Russ Ortiz and Kirk Rueter who won games in spite of their mediocrity. They were not great pitchers, no matter what the W-L column said. They were average/mediocre pitchers on good teams.
We don't like Arnsberg all of a sudden? Ms. Baseball, please define to me what a good coach is.
I have no complaints at all about any of the coaches - they are doing just fine.
Washington manager, Frank Robinson, wants Rafael Palmeiro's hitting statistics wiped out because he failed a drug test. He said "to eliminate all that, you will get the player's attention, and you wipe the whole thing out".
That makes a lot of good sense to me - how about they do that with ALL players that fail the test? That may stop the abuse, particularly for next season. Everyone would be starting out with a "clean" slate.
What a great concept! (They could start with Giambi).
Frankly, I am afraid to watch this series!
I think we need to cross all toes and fingers, collectively!
And unlike Mark McGwire's then-record, which MLB went collectively cuckoo over, Rickey's records are almost certainly untainted in any way.
Who cares what MLB think, anyway? They can no more take a player's records away from him than they can erase the past injustices they have perpetrated. The records form a part of history, and unless MLB have been spending all the money they've saved by not drug testing the past 25 years on building a Super-Secret Time Machine inside an old DeLorean in one of Bud Selig's used car lots, they're going to have a hard time changing it.
If MLB have a sudden yen to start engaging in revisionist history, I can think of some other excellent places to start rather than by selectively sucking stat lines out of record books. I never bought the idea of the asterisk next to Maris's record, and I don't buy this idea either.
Also, where is Buck Martiniez? I do believe I read, or heard, that he is a Sports Analyst? Anyone know? Not a very good Baseball Manager, but I liked him a lot!
Billy Koch is enjoying retired life, and last I heard John Rocker was attempting a comeback in the minors which I believe was/is a failure.
That would be so good!!
Good Luck to the Jays tonite, right?
Thanks for the info on the guys. I couldn't find out anything on the Internet!
In the words of my Dad, who is also a huge Baseball Fan - "Goodbye Charlie"!
Goodnight Guys! There is always tomorrow!!