The future is bright for the Jays though and the pressure is on J.P. to fill the glaring holes in the starting rotation and the offense heading into next year. He has the money and his draft picks are reaching the majors. 2006 is put up or shut up time for J.P. and the Jays.
Perhaps going to names of Red Wings greats in the chat was a bad idea. In fact, I propose that we stop with the name changing thing. It's just not working.
RISP: .288/.357/.538
RISP, 2 outs: .279/.354/.628
Honestly. Do these people even bother or do they just spit out the same things over and over?
Chacin gave up more hits but the two runs that the Tigers scored in regulation time were off solo homeruns. In the Jays' case they needed an RBI groundout and then a sac fly with the bases loaded to push two runs across. That's having to work way too hard to produce anything.
The thing is they have a lot of games where the runs do come relatively easily and I'm not sure how to explain it. I think the mediocore power has a lot to do with it. There are going to be nights where you just aren't going to produce with RISP and power is the equalizing factor on those nights. The ability to make the pitcher pay for one mistake or even for a pitch that wasn't necessarily a mistake is an important one.
Honestly. Do these people even bother or do they just spit out the same things over and over?
Vernon Wells Close and Late
.236/.269/.375 .. .644 OPS/.215 GPA in 76PA
Anyone who watches the Jays without blinders will have noticed that Verno has been horrid when the game is on the line. You can claim it's bad luck, or small sample, but don't claim it doesn't exist.
Verno seems to hit fine early in the game (which before you jump all over me, is very important) and when there is a big lead one way or another. However, for whatever reason, he struggles when the game is on the line.
BTW, I'm not blaming Verno for last night, just pointing out something I think was missed.
NAME G AB R H 2B 3B HR TB RBI BB SO SB CS BAV OBP SLG OPS Russ Adams 47 60 5 21 6 0 1 30 6 6 12 1 1 .350 .409 .500 .909 S. Hillenbrand 63 79 13 26 8 0 0 34 3 6 15 0 0 .329 .384 .430 .814 O. Hudson 61 75 8 24 2 1 4 40 11 9 10 1 0 .320 .393 .533 .926 Eric Hinske 61 63 14 19 6 0 2 31 9 10 18 2 1 .302 .405 .492 .897 Aaron Hill 30 41 5 12 2 0 0 14 6 3 4 0 0 .293 .333 .341 .675 Alex Rios 56 72 6 20 2 0 0 22 8 5 14 1 2 .278 .325 .306 .630 Reed Johnson 48 57 10 14 4 0 3 27 8 1 15 0 0 .246 .283 .474 .757 Vernon Wells 56 72 6 17 4 0 2 27 10 4 6 0 1 .236 .269 .375 .644 Corey Koskie 35 46 5 10 2 0 2 18 5 3 14 0 0 .217 .265 .391 .657 F. Catalanotto 38 44 3 8 3 0 0 11 2 2 7 0 0 .182 .245 .250 .495 Gregg Zaun 53 65 5 11 2 0 1 16 7 11 13 0 0 .169 .286 .246 .532
Needless to say... very small sample sizes. The guy hitting .169 has driven in twice as many runs as than the guy hitting .329 in more at bats.
Nevertheless, Orlando Hudson is a god among men.
There are exceptions, but I always assume that major league players all have a fair bit of intestinal fortitude. For one thing, it's more nerve-racking to try to make it to the major-league level than it is to succeed there. (Which is more stressful: a player's first month in the majors, in which he is trying to prove that he is good enough, or an at-bat with a game on the line?)
My belief is that the differences in "clutch hitting" performance are primarily random chance.
What's up with Reed Johnson and his lack of high socks?