Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
It's never too early to look at the draft!

Based on team's 2005 record (and in the event of a tie their 2004 record) here is the draft order for the 2006 draft:
2006 Draft Order
1. Royals (56-106)	11. D'backs (77-85)	21. Phillies (88-74)
2. Rockies (67-95)	12. Rangers (79-83)	22. Athletics (88-74)
3. Devil Rays (67-95)	13. Cubs (79-83)	23. Astros (89-73)
4. Pirates (67-95)	14. Blue Jays (80-82)	24. Braves (90-72)
5. Mariners (69-93)	15. Nationals (81-81)	25. Indians (93-69)
6. Tigers (71-91)	16. Brewers (81-81)	26. Angels (95-67)
7. Dodgers (71-91)	17. Padres (82-80)	27. Red Sox (95-67)
8. Reds (73-89)	        18. Mets (83-79)	28. Yankees (95-67)
9. Orioles (74-88)	19. Marlins (83-79)	29. White Sox (99-63)
10. Giants (75-87)	20. Twins (83-79)	30. Cardinals (100-62)
The draft order will almost certainly change as teams will lose draft pick(s) for signing particular free agents. However, teams in the top 15 cannot lose their first round pick.

The Jays pick 14th in the draft. If they had won one more game they would have finished 81-81, tied with Washington and Milwaukee, and because they had a better 2004 record than those two teams they would have picked 16th. In that case if the Jays were to sign a top free agent they would have lost their first pick. Now, because they're in the top 15, if they sign a free agent it will cost the team a 2nd round pick instead of a 1st round pick.

See, a winning record isn't all it's cracked up to be if you're not in the playoffs. I think Batista knew this and blew a couple games in September for the best long term interest of the organization.

According to Baseball America here are the top 10 prospects for the 2006 draft:

1. Andrew Miller, LHP,  North Carolina
2. Drew Stubbs, OF, Texas
3. Max Scherzer, RHP, Missouri
4. Jordan Walden, RHP, Mansfield HS, Arlington, Texas
5. Daniel Bard, RHP, North Carolina
6. Matt Latos, RHP, Coconut Creek (Fla.) HS
7. Wes Hodges, 3B, Georgia Tech
8. Ian Kennedy, RHP, USC
9. Cody Johnson, OF, Mosley HS, Lynnhaven, Fla.
10. Evan Longoria, SS, Long Beach State

Here's a look at the stats of the college players above, as well as other top college players in 2005 that will be draft eligible in 2006.

Pitchers

Ian Kennedy, RHP, USC
Year	Innings	ERA	K/9	BB/9	HR/9
2005	117.0	2.54	12.2	2.9	0.5
2004	 92.2	2.91	11.7	3.0	0.4

Andrew Miller, LHP, North Carolina
Year	Innings	ERA	K/9	BB/9	HR/9
2005	96.2	2.98	9.7	4.9	0.4
2004	89.0	2.93	8.9	4.9	0.5

Max Scherzer, RHP, Missouri
Year	Innings	ERA	K/9	BB/9	HR/9
2005	106.1	1.86	11.1	3.5	0.3

Dallas Buck, RHP, Oregon State
Year	Innings	ERA	K/9	BB/9	HR/9
2005	129.0	2.09	8.2	3.6	0.2
2004	 69.1	5.06	7.4	3.9	0.7

Daniel Bard, RHP, North Carolina
Year	Innings	ERA	K/9	BB/9	HR/9
2005	89.2	4.22	7.8	4.3	0.8
2004	95.0	3.88	6.4	2.9	0.7

Kennedy caught my eye in 2004 and when I looked him up I couldn't believe he was just a freshman. He pitched well on Team USA that summer on a team that included 2005 top draftees Romero, Pelfrey, and Hochevar. He and Max Scherzer both pitched well for Team USA this summer. I'm not certain why Kennedy isn't at the top of the list, but I suspect it's because he's just 6'0" so he doesn't have the classic 'Ace' build.

Miller, Buck and Bard all pitched in the Cape League this summer, each posting a K rate above 10 per 9 innings.

Miller is at the top of BA's list and when I see his profile I can't help but think of David Purcey.

David Purcey, LHP, Oklahoma
Year	Inn	ERA	K/9	BB/9	HR/9
2004	118.2	3.11	9.9	4.1	0.4
2003	72.2	5.20	8.4	5.1	0.5
2002	75.1	3.35   10.1	5.3	0.4

Both Miller and Purcey are big, power LH pitchers, strike out around 9 per 9 innings, yet walk 4-5 batters per 9 innings.

Hitters

The hitters in this year's class aren't as heralded as the pitchers, but there are still some quality players out there.

Shane Robinson, OF, Florida State
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	286	0.427	0.532	0.605	57	28
2004	275	0.280	0.358	0.371	23	35

Matt Laporta, 1B, Florida
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	265	0.328	0.438	0.698	44	65
2004	130	0.285	0.371	0.646	13	39

Jim Negrych, 2b, Pittsburgh
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	186	0.349	0.471	0.694	44	37
2004	201	0.378	0.464	0.592	33	36

Aaron Bates, 1B, North Carolina State
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	214	0.428	0.523	0.678	37	27
2003	145	0.297	0.407	0.393	13	23 (at San Jose St)

Mike Ambort, C, Lamar
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	217	0.336	0.414	0.654	21	24
2004	200	0.270	0.338	0.465	14	30

Chris Campbell, 2B, Coll. of Charleston
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	269	0.379	0.421	0.625	22	27
2004	217	0.332	0.372	0.530	11	31

Wes Hodges, 3b, Georgia Tech
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	267	0.397	0.466	0.566	28	35
2004	184	0.304	0.387	0.467	19	25

Adam Davis, 2B, Florida
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	294	0.306	0.395	0.486	40	46
2004	253	0.320	0.389	0.458	22	35

Evan Longoria, ss, Long Beach State U.
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	228	0.320	0.368	0.421	14	41

Drew Stubbs, of, U. of Texas
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	283	0.311	0.384	0.527	32	71
2004	266	0.301	0.372	0.474	28	75

---------------

In addition to the stats above Shane Robinson also was 49 for 56 in steal attempts. Not bad. He looks like the classic leadoff hitter, and a better version of Jacoby Ellsbury, taken 23rd this past draft by the Red Sox.

Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	244	0.406	0.495	0.582	36     21 - Ellsbury
2005	286	0.427	0.532	0.605	57     28 - Robinson

Matt Laporta shows the most power, with an ISO Slg% of .370. And given that the SEC is full of pitcher's parks I believe that SEC hitters are generally underrated. (Given the number of SEC players the Jays took this year perhaps they feel the same way.) Florida does play in a slightly favorable hitting park, but their weighted schedule is neutral. Laporta's 26 HRs last season led the NCAA.

Getting back to comparisons, Jim Negrych reminds me of Jed Lowrie of Stanford, and now in the Sox system after being drafted in the sandwich round this past year. Both players are 2B with great college numbers who (perhaps rightfully) aren't thought of as highly by scouts as the players that will go in round 1.

Lowrie, 2B, Stanford
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	224	0.317	0.416	0.594	41	41
2004	233	0.399	0.505	0.734	50	40
2003	212	0.292	0.349	0.349	19	25

Negrych
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	186	0.349	0.471	0.694	44	37
2004	201	0.378	0.464	0.592	33	36

Evan Longoria gained some attention this summer after a strong Cape League, leading the league in HRs. However, despite the similarity in names he is not the same person as Eva Longoria. And yes, I only mentioned this so I could link to pictures of Eva Longoria.

Back for more fun in the spring.
Early 2006 Draft Preview | 21 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
rtcaino - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 10:07 AM EDT (#130615) #
Pistol, you are the man.

I can't say how glad I am that we retain our first round pick no matter what. From that perspective, this season went about as well as possible.
Mike Green - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 10:44 AM EDT (#130620) #

2006 draft ages (links are to profiles):
Ian Kennedy, 21
Andrew Miller, 21
Max Scherzer, 21
Daniel Bard, 20(just)
Shane Robinson, 21
Matt Laporta, 21
Jim Negrych, 21
Aaron Bates, 22
Mike Ambort, 21
Wes Hodges, 21
Adam Davis, 21
Drew Stubbs, 21

And, here are Boyd Nation's park and strength of schedule adaptations of the stats.

Jordan - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 10:51 AM EDT (#130622) #
If the Jays didn't take a high-schooler with the 6th pick in the draft last June, then I don't see them ever taking a high-schooler, unless they have something like the five first-round picks Oakland held a few years ago. More and more, I'm coming to think that as wise as a college-only approach is in some circumstances (such as needing an injection of safe talent into a poor system), it isn't a good blanket policy, especially with hitters. We'll see what happens next June.
Mike Green - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 11:11 AM EDT (#130624) #
It is not clear to me that the organization will avoid drafting a high school hitter in 2006. I recommended drafting Maybin over Ricky Romero in 2005, but the organization was especially concerned about making a push to win in 2007 and the thought was that Romero would be ready quickly.

The expiring contracts of 2007 will not play a role in the draft decisions of 2006.
Ron - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 12:37 PM EDT (#130626) #
Is there any sort of study out there that shows college pitchers and hitters are generally better selections than drafting HS pitchers and hitters?

I know there's percieved to be a greater risk in taking a HS'er because many things can happen such as flaming out, injuries, don't know how they will project after 18 years old, etc.... but is there really more risk involved?

I do wish MLB had a rookie cap system. It's a shame when large payroll clubs can grab top 10 talents (Drew, Weaver, Hanson, etc...) without having a top 10 pick because small payroll teams aren't willing to meet bonus demands. Yes I'm mainly talking about Scott Boras clients.
Craig B - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 02:07 PM EDT (#130630) #
If the Jays didn't take a high-schooler with the 6th pick in the draft last June, then I don't see them ever taking a high-schooler

Did you have anyone particular in mind? Maybin? I would rather have had Maybin than Romero, but a lot of teams agreed that the strength on the hitting side in 2005 was NOT in high school, but all college. Maybin at #6 probably would have taken a bonus almost a million dollars higher to sign than Romero did (as it was, it cost the Tigers $250K more, and that was from pick #10).

Mike Green - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 02:19 PM EDT (#130633) #
Rany Jazayerli did a 7 part series in BP from May-Sept. 2005 on draft history, including success rates for college and HS picks. He suggests that historically college picks were better value, but that this is no longer true. It is perhaps not surprising in this light that the A's chose high school pitchers in the 2005 draft for the first time in years.
MatO - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 02:33 PM EDT (#130634) #
If I recall correctly, Rany's study showed that in recent drafts college hitters still had more value than HS hitters but that college and HS pitchers were basically a wash. Obviously, college players were more productive sooner than HS players.
Maldoff - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 04:34 PM EDT (#130651) #
Just as a point of clarification, Evan Longoria is not the same person as Eva Longoria. In fact, he is her BROTHER! Yes, the parents named their kids Eva and Evan.

DRAFT LONGORIA!!!
Pistol - Thursday, October 27 2005 @ 05:05 PM EDT (#130655) #
No, they're not related. Or at least that's what he said in a BA interview earlier this year.

If the Jays didn't take a high-schooler with the 6th pick in the draft last June, then I don't see them ever taking a high-schooler

Maybin would have been the only HS'er under consideration for the Jays this year and he ended up going at number 10 so there were teams after the Jays that didn't think he was worth the pick at that spot. It was more of a HS oriented draft at the top this past year.

I prefer the Jays college oriented approach if only because it makes researching players more interesting and narrows the draft pool down when their picks roll around (although if I recall correctly there were a few HS players that they were going to take that went ahead of their pick).

sweat - Friday, October 28 2005 @ 09:35 AM EDT (#130687) #
Maybe he just needs some time in the Jays system to develop into Eva Longoria's brother.
Mike Green - Friday, October 28 2005 @ 09:52 AM EDT (#130689) #
Jim Callis indicated in his ask BA column of October 13 that Negrych projects as a 5th to 10th rounder. His defence apparently is quite raw, although it is possible that he could become a major league second baseman.
Pistol - Friday, October 28 2005 @ 10:33 AM EDT (#130692) #
Perhaps Negrych is more Ryan Roberts than Jed Lowrie.
Ryan Roberts, Texas-Arlington
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2003	230	0.422	0.514	0.765	42	31
2002	213	0.362	0.446	0.620	31	45

Jim Negrych, 2b, Pittsburgh
Year	ABs	Ave	OBP	SLG	BB	K
2005	186	0.349	0.471	0.694	44	37
2004	201	0.378	0.464	0.592	33	36
Not that Roberts is an outstanding prospect, but he is one, and given his college stats I can't believe he went as late as round 18. He was one of the best college hitters in 2003.

Roberts' sophmore year (2002) is comparible to Negrych's sophmore year (2005).

Mike Green - Friday, October 28 2005 @ 11:53 AM EDT (#130697) #
Negrych is a significantly better prospect than Roberts was. His freshman year in 2004 was as good as Roberts' sophomore 2002, and he was a year and a half younger.

My own view is that 5th to 10th round understates Negrych's value because of his age. His 2004 performance was age 19, and last year was age 20 (he turned in March). If I am right, he'll probably turn it on in 2006 and by the time draft day arrives, he won't be seen as a 5th to 10th rounder.
Craig B - Friday, October 28 2005 @ 05:37 PM EDT (#130709) #
Whoops, Mike! Don't assume that the competition NCAA players face is equivalent.

Negrych and Pitt face a pathetic schedule - Pitt were #201 in strength of schedule in 2005, and #181 in 2004. You have to deflate Negrych's run production by about 6% in '04 and 10% in '05 just to get him facing an average schedule - not to mention what a good southern school faces.

Roberts and Texas-Arlington played the #32 schedule in 2003, and the #71 schedule in 2002. Inflate Roberts's run production by about 18% in 2003 and 13% in 2002 to get a measure of what he was doing on an "average" basis.

Parks matter too... Roberts was in an extreme pitcher's park environment at Arlington, with a park factor of around 85. Pitt's park is also a pitcher's park, but it's very slight. Roberts picks up about 7-10% on Negrych that way too.

All in all, Roberts's run production baseline was about 25-40% lower than Negrych's. So you're beginning to see why Roberts was such an absurd steal as an 18th-rounder... even being older, the actual production of the two guys wasn't in the same league.

Negrych is dominating the pitchers he faces, but those pitchers are of such a low level that it doesn't have a lot of meaning. Who cares if he can hit a 80mph fastball or a hanging curve?

As for Lowrie, he was facing a tougher level of competition than Roberts. Also, Lowrie is 6-0 while Roberts and Negrych are 5-10... that doesn't mean much to you or me but MLB talent evaluators are obsessed by height. Lowrie is also a true SS who played 2B to fit team needs, while neither Roberts nor Negrych carry a hot glove at second. So Lowrie gets picked 40th, and Roberts gets picked 560th or whatever. Crazy.
Craig B - Friday, October 28 2005 @ 05:47 PM EDT (#130710) #
Which begs the question...

Why did Roberts get passed over?

It's not just in the fact he's a short guy, or a second baseman. Those guys get picked lower, yeah, but they get picked in Jim Negrych territory - rounds 5-10. Why did Roberts last until round 18?

First, I think if you asked any typical person, they'd think Pitt was a major school, and Texas-Arlington a "huh?" school. That's true in terms of <i>perception</i>, but it's not true in terms of baseball programs. Still, people will be ascribing "small-school" prejudice to a player like Roberts, irrespective of the fact that he faced tough competition.

It's the "small-conference" phenomenon, and it affects the NCAA right down to the RPI ratings system it uses, which actually gives large-conference teams bonus points for no reason at all. The Big East is seen as a "big conference" with tough competition and the Southland is seen as a "small conference" with weak competition even though <i>in baseball</i> the Southland teams could line up 1-10 and kick the Big East's butt.
Craig B - Friday, October 28 2005 @ 05:49 PM EDT (#130711) #
In the future, when people want to emphasize something they won't bother printing it in italic text, they'll just put HTML tags around it. I'm just ahead of the curve.
Craig B - Friday, October 28 2005 @ 07:00 PM EDT (#130714) #
To give you an idea of what that "baseline" thing means, let's run some math.

The typical run environment for the NCAA is just about bang on six runs per team per game. Thank you, aluminum.

We'll use Roberts's '02 and Negrych's '05 (sophomore years) to make the calculation.

Negrych's schedule was 10% weaker in runs terms than average - so the average baseline goes up to 6.6 runs. Roberts was 13% tougher in runs terms, so his average baseline goes down to 5.2 runs.

Negrych's park factor (for all parks in which he played, not just at home) is about 3%. So Negrych's baseline goes down to 6.4 runs. Roberts's runs baseline declines by about 9% based on park (as best I can estimate) so his runs baseline goes down to 4.7 runs.

Using basic runs created and the above formula, Negrych created about 60 runs and used 121 outs. Roberts created about 60 runs and used 136 outs.

Negrych 13.4 runs per 27 outs, Roberts 11.9 runs per 27 outs.

But Roberts comes put ahead in runs above average (7.2 to 7) and in terms of a multiple of average, which is what I am more concerned with, Roberts is far ahead - his RC+ is about 253, while Negrych is at 209.

I must go to dinner now. Later!
Mike Green - Sunday, October 30 2005 @ 10:17 AM EST (#130764) #
Thanks, Craig. I'll check SOS and park factors next time.:)
Craig B - Sunday, October 30 2005 @ 10:24 AM EST (#130765) #
Heh, Mike I wasn't being critical, just pointing out the fact that NCAA stats aren't very useful without adding a lot of contextual stuff.
Mike Green - Sunday, October 30 2005 @ 10:51 AM EST (#130768) #
I agree that Roberts' availability in the 18th round was a surprise. Perhaps the more interesting markers for Negrych in terms of recent Jay draftees might be someone like Klosterman or Hall (who were 5th and 10th round selections respectively).
Early 2006 Draft Preview | 21 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.