Player of the Game? Vernon? 2 HRs, 5 RBI?
The messiness at the end dimmed (but didn't quite erase) a picture perfect beginning, with nearly every swing off Franklin in the first inning sweet and pure, especially the one by VDub. When so many of the batters before him were able to make solid contact, you wanted Wells to assert himself as a power force and take us to the next level, which he did.
And am I the only one who sees a little Paul Molitor in Aaron Hill's quick, punching swing? Molitor used to stand quietly in the box and wait till the last split second before snapping at the ball, and Hill's approach seems remarkably similar.
Congrats to Gaudin, by the way. He seemed a tad eratic at first, but he settled down nicely.
Wells is definitely off my list of players that I'm worried about as of tonight. I like him hitting lower in the order though since he's never been a high OBP player but he has good power. 5th, like where Texas moved Soriano (a pretty similar hitter over their careers .285/.330/.480 for Wells v .283/.322/.503 for Soriano), seems like a good spot.
Gaudin looked pretty good. Recovered nicely from the jam in the first. I didn't realize he's only 22. Definitely looking forward to seeing his next start.
It was nice to see Wells sting the ball - he just crushed it 4 times, including a couple of hard hit outs. If he swung at a first pitch at all, it was only once.
Gaudin also impressed - he had a couple of rough patches but was able to keep himself under control. He seemed to be able to get his offspeed stuff over at any part of the count.
I'd forgotten how nice it is to see a game at the park...
Adrian Beltre looked positively awful for the M's, especially the first two AB's against Gaudin. Just a whole bunch of check swings and weak waves at pitches down in the dirt.
Tony freakin' Womack and Bret Boone in contention at 2nd base? Giambi #2 at DH? C'mon!
Back in one of his Abstracts in the early 80's, James made a case for placing a high OBP player in the 5-hole given that player's likelihood for leading off the 2nd inning. James' preferred lineup construction was predicated on breaking the lineup into two groups (slots 1-4, slots 5-9) with each fronted by a leadoff guy (better at OBP than SLG) and finished with a table clearer (better at SLG than OBP).
His argument for where the speed players should go ran counter to popular thinking then and now. He didn't think group 1 needed speedy table setters since the power hitters behind them would drive them home regardless. He believed the speedy players were better off in the second group where the table clearers were more likely to drive home runs with singles than with extra base hits.
In the first inning that was my exact thought. Sure he needs to, and can, pitch better, but if he got 5 runs before he took the mound maybe his confidence is different.
During the game I told my wife how much Hill's swing reminded me of the Magnificent Molitor.
However, physically he looks really chunky form the waist down. As he ages and thickens he'll be a great hittin' funny lookin' critter. Hopefully, a Blue Jay All-Star for years at third or second.