Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Orlando Hudson and Photo of the Day mojo recipient Russ Adams had two hits each, and Miguel Batista earned a fine save, but tonight belonged to Josh Towers.

I have nothing but unreserved love and admiration for Josh Towers.

Win or lose, dominate or get shelled, every inning that Josh Towers spends in the major leagues is a testament to human perseverance, and a monument of pure bloody-mindedness. This is a guy who's been written off so many times he's fully tax-deductible. A guy who's been told at every step along the way that he isn't good enough to go further. A guy who flat-out refuses to be defined by what he can't do, and demands that you deal directly with what he can.

"Bulldog", while a great nickname, doesn't even begin to capture the spirit with which Towers attacks the conflict between batter and pitcher. He's all offense and no defense - not as much as bulldog as a wolverine. Unwilling to surrender even an inch of ground, Towers forces every hitter, on every pitch, to do what is often described as the hardest job in the world - hit a round ball travelling 90 miles per hour with a round bat. He will give you nothing any other way - you must hit it.

And tonight, against the best-hitting lineup in the majors, for batter after batter Josh Towers forced them to fail. The Orioles registered a grand total of three hits, added just one walk, and failed to put even a single runner on second base. The furthest any Baltimore runner got was David Newhan trying a takeout slide on a Russ Adams double play in the eighth inning.

For his part, the massive Daniel Cabrera of the Orioles was magnificent and an extremely unlucky loser. Though not possessed of Towers' exquisite control, Cabrera fought hard all night to get ahead of the Jays hitters, who found his curveball completely unhittable. Cabrera wasted pitch after pitch on the pitcher's counts, but on even counts his fastball and curve were as nasty as I've seen from any Blue Jays opponent this year. Both Cabrera and Towers were helped somewhat by a shifting strike zone from plate umpire Brian Gorman (who was particularly inconsistent on the outside corner for left-handed hitters, to the point where several were driven to distraction).

The Towers-Cabrera matchup was a terrific study in contrasts. Towers, a small and slight pitcher without any dominating pitches and relying on a four-seam rising fastball, never gives an inch, never wastes a pitch, has simply outstanding control. Cabrera: a huge, intimidating man with a blazing sinking fastball and a very fine tight, late-breaking curve, is as profligate with his pitches as any pitcher I can recently remember. Though Cabrera demonstrated excellent control in the pinch tonight, he wastes as many pitches as any pitcher possibly can; I'm not sure he threw a 0-1, 0-2 or 1-2 pitch in the strike zone all night, and if he did it certainly wasn't the fastball.

At any rate, whatever their methods, both were devastating tonight. Towers, despite his animated demeanour on the mound, is as quiet an assassin as you're likely to see. A game against Towers for a hitter may last eight pitches, four swings, and if you're not lucky, four outs and a collar. His style of forcing hitters to swing or fall behind, gives him the psychological advantage even when he's matched up against a more talented player.

I fully intended tonight to write about one of my baseball heroes, the great Orioles shortstop Miguel Tejada. When Towers started felling Orioles left and right, I changed course. A good thing I did, because Tejada had one of those days I just described. He hit two balls hard; unfortunately for him, he hit them right at waiting outfielders.

The Orioles only sent 28 hitters to the plate - one over the minimum possible for a losing team in a nine-inning game. Perhaps sensing his team's impending struggles at the plate, manager Lee Mazzilli decided to put his runners in motion at every possible opportunity. The result was a brilliant pickoff of Brian Roberts by Towers, a fine throw by Gregg Zaun to nail Luis Matos, and a rundown play on a delayed steal by the slow-footed Larry Bigbie where he would have been out by 40 feet. It was not a good day to be the O's manager.

Through it all, Towers remained unflappable (with the exception of his extended bunny hop when Sammy Sosa hit a long flyout to the warning track in right field in the seventh inning). He's never going to be a great pitcher. But he's as fun a pitcher to watch, and as easy a pitcher to root for, as anyone. I hope and trust now that Josh Towers is no longer (in his most famous quote) "pitching for the other 29 teams". Tonight was his finest hour, and I, for one, am glad it came for this team and this team alone.
Jays 1, Orioles 0 | 37 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Magpie - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 04:42 AM EDT (#115480) #
Well said! How can anyone not root for Josh Towers?

He's now made 35 starts as a Blue Jay, and has a 20-11 record. The best pitch in baseball is still Strike One.

After tonight, Towers said: "I don't think I've thrown a better game than that. It's just sweet doing it against Baltimore because.....(wait for it! Because they dumped me? No!) they're the best hitting team in baseball.

Dr. Zarco - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 06:10 AM EDT (#115481) #

the massive Miguel Cabrera of the Orioles

Ah, Miguel certainly can hit too! Daniel and Towers were both terrific-what an unexpected pitcher's duel. After the paucity of runs (until the 12th) Monday, I fully expected each offense to bust out a little bit. Glad I was wrong. Towers didn't quite have the strikeout pitch he's had so far this year-the AB to Gil in the 7th or 8th sticks out-but he wouldn't let the O's "hit it where they ain't."

Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 07:48 AM EDT (#115482) #
I was thinking about the Yankees OF situation and a comment I made last night.

Is there anyone on the Yankees 25-man roster you'd trade straight-up for Reed Johnson if you were J.P.? It's a tough question, because pretty much every desirable player on the team is so overpaid.
Jim - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 08:50 AM EDT (#115486) #
Yes, I'd do Cano for Johnson.
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 08:57 AM EDT (#115488) #
Yes, I'd do Cano for Johnson.

That's a tough one. Yeah, Cano is a bit of a prospect. But his minor league numbers aren't all that fantastic (other than half a season at AA last year). But he is really, really young. So yeah, I guess it would be a deal worth making. In all likelihood, though, Cano will be the next Chris Gomez.

Pistol - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 09:10 AM EDT (#115493) #
Stolen from Magpie in the game thread:
Jays are juggling the rotation a bit with all the off-days ahead over the next couple of weeks. It should look something like this:

Wed  4 May at Blt - Halladay
Thu  5 May - OFF
Fri  6 May vs Chi - Bush
Sat  7 May vs Chi - Lilly
Sun  8 May vs Chi - Chacin
Mon  9 May vs KC  - Halladay (4 days off)
Tue 10 May vs KC  - Towers (6 days off)
Wed 11 May vs KC  - Bush (4 days off)
Thu 12 May - OFF
Fri 13 May at Cle - Lilly (5 days off)
Sat 14 May at Cle - Halladay (4 days off)
Sun 15 May at Cle - Chacin (6 days off)
Mon 16 May - OFF
Tue 17 May at Min - Towers (6 days off)
Wed 18 May at Min - Bush (6 days off)
Thu 19 May at Min - Halladay (4 days off)
Fri 20 May vs Wsh - Lilly (6 days off)
Sat 21 May vs Wsh - Chacin (5 days off)
Hmmm. Spot the trend! From now through the end of the Twins series, Doc gets 4 starts, Bush 3 and everyone else 2. 

I'm not so sure this is necessary. If the back end of the rotation is getting bombed then perhaps it's a good idea, but the starters as a whole are doing pretty well right now.

I think getting an extra day's rest for Halladay periodically and maintaining the rotation order would be better than trying to squeeze an extra start or two out of Halladay over the course of the season.

If things were left unchanged it'd look like this:

Wed  4 May at Blt - Halladay - 4
Thu  5 May - OFF
Fri  6 May vs Chi - Bush - 5
Sat  7 May vs Chi - Lilly - 5
Sun  8 May vs Chi - Chacin - 5
Mon  9 May vs KC  - Towers - 5 
Tue 10 May vs KC  - Halladay -5
Wed 11 May vs KC  - Bush - 4
Thu 12 May - OFF
Fri 13 May at Cle - Lilly - 5
Sat 14 May at Cle - Chacin  - 5
Sun 15 May at Cle - Towers - 5
Mon 16 May - OFF
Tue 17 May at Min - Halladay - 6 
Wed 18 May at Min - Bush - 6
Thu 19 May at Min - Lilly - 5
Fri 20 May vs Wsh - Chacin - 5
Sat 21 May vs Wsh - Towers - 5
Sun 22 May vs Wsh - Halladay - 4

I suspect that the Jays would have left the rotation alone if Halladay wasn't going to be on 6 days rest for the May 17th game.

Arms Longfellow - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 09:26 AM EDT (#115495) #
I'd take Hideki Matsui for Reed Johnson. He's overpaid but not grossly so, and I could afford it because of Uncy Ted's newfound generosity.
daryn - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 09:26 AM EDT (#115497) #
I suspect that the Jays would have left the rotation alone if Halladay wasn't going to be on 6 days rest for the May 17th game.
I don't know, switching Towers and Halladay from May15th to 17th, would put Halladay on 4 for that week without messing with everyone else.
I suspect its more a belief that Halladay throws "better" on 4 days rest.
alsiem - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 09:31 AM EDT (#115499) #
Last night was a great game. Two thoughts came to mind:

1) When Adms gets a lucky check swing "bunt", all of a sudden the Jays are playing small ball. I think the Jays do whatever they think will help them win on the night taking the opposition's strenghs into consideration. I think this flexible approach is a strength of Gibbon's management.

2) Batista is rounding into form. I've probably screwed it up by grabbing him for the fantasy team this morning but I loved the way he just pounded the strike zone. I think that's three appearances in a row where there was a minimum of fuss.
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 09:39 AM EDT (#115501) #
I'd take Hideki Matsui for Reed Johnson. He's overpaid but not grossly so, and I could afford it because of Uncy Ted's newfound generosity.

I forgot about Matsui. I would too. In a heartbeat.

Okay, so there's at least one or two players worth Reed. :)

Jim - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 10:13 AM EDT (#115504) #
I considered Matsui as well. How about Wang? I wouldn't say I'm sold on him, but that's probably pretty good value for Johnson.
Ryan C - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 10:31 AM EDT (#115507) #
But if we're talking about the Yankees needing outfielders then why would they give up Matsui? Howbout a non-outfielder on the Yankees you'd take for Reed? And for the purposes of this question both Womack and Bernie count as non-outfielders. Myself Im not sure if there's anyone Id take for Reed when salary and age are brought into the equation.
Ryan C - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 10:41 AM EDT (#115508) #
Quick off-topic question: Hillenbrand's contract is up at the end of the year. Will he be a free agent or will the Jays still hold his rights? I know that with Lilly the Jays will still hold his rights but Im not sure on Hillenbrand.
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 10:50 AM EDT (#115509) #
But if we're talking about the Yankees needing outfielders then why would they give up Matsui?

Oh, they totally wouldn't. I wasn't trying to come up with a trade proposal. I was just trying to illustrate that the Yankees are lacking in marketable assets.

If the Yanks want to get an outfielder, they'll either have to take someone's problem contract, or get a AAAA guy like the remains of Ben Grieve for future considerations/D minor league prospect.

Pistol - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 10:53 AM EDT (#115510) #
What makes Matsui overpaid? He was top 30 in VORP last year.

If the Jays signed him this offseason at his current salary ($8 million) I think I'd be pretty pleased.
Coach - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 10:58 AM EDT (#115511) #
Matsui would be outstanding here, even at $10 million, but I suspect he'll sign a richer extension then return to Japan for a farewell tour when he's no longer a Yankee. At least there's finally money for the Jays to contemplate such a move.

Since it's kind of a Yankees thread, I want to point out that auditioning Billy Koch, Kerry Ligtenberg, Terry Adams and a half-dozen others is more cost-effective -- even if they all fail -- than making one incorrect call on a Steve Karsay. I'm also wondering how popular Kevin Brown is right now in his own clubhouse. Hope there's a way for J.P. to take advantage of the owner's inevitable panic the way he did in dumping Mondesi.

Shameless begging dept.: I'm working long hours again this week (hate to miss today's game) while trying to find a new place to live. If anyone knows of a 3-bedroom home for rent in downtown Toronto, preferably a house near the Bloor subway line between Spadina and High Park, please e-mail me. We're responsible tenants with great references (the K-Dog is small and well-behaved) but we have to move by July 1. Thanks.

Mike Green - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:00 AM EDT (#115512) #

The most insightful team stats are available on THT.

The stats contain nuggets about the Jays' start. The offence has been a little lucky- .319 BABIP despite below average ISO power, line drive percentage, and average team speed. Maybe it's not lucky, but getting to face the Yankees so often! On the other hand, the team batting average with runners in scoring position is a little below average despite being above average in other situations.

On the other side of the ledger, the news is all good. The DER is above average at .706, the K and BB rates are good, the HR rate is fine, the LD rate is above average, and most surprisingly, the pop-up rate is terrific. If anything, the Jays have pitched better than their ERA shows, despite having faced the league's strongest offences disproportionately in the first 1/6 of the season. It would be a surprise if the Jays end up the season with a team ERA under 4, but it is no longer unthinkable.

PeterG - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:03 AM EDT (#115513) #
RyanC,

This is Hillenbrand's fifth season, so it must be that he would be eligible for FA after 2006 season. He would only be arby eligible this season as he was last and would remain Jays property as long as he was offered arbitration.
Pistol - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:03 AM EDT (#115514) #
Matsui was top 30 in VORP last year

That is, among position players.

Jobu - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:09 AM EDT (#115515) #
Ugh... Sparky on the Yankees? That's like seeing the ex-girlfriend you still have thing for with Gene Simmons.
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:24 AM EDT (#115516) #
Better that than Richard Simmons.
Jobu - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:26 AM EDT (#115517) #
But if it was Richard then at least you'd know they're not doing very much.... that and she's staying in shape. I wonder how Bill Simmons would factor into this.
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:29 AM EDT (#115519) #
Bill's out golfing with former Cardinal catcher Ted Simmons.
Craig B - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:31 AM EDT (#115520) #
D'oh. Daniel Cabrera. In my defense, I lacked sleep. :)
Dave Till - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:37 AM EDT (#115521) #
Two years ago, I never would have guessed that Towers could ever pitch like that. He's obviously worked very hard to refine his mechanics; this has led to improvements in both control and velocity. Last night, he was occasionally throwing fastballs up in the zone and blowing them by hitters. Good for him!

Right now, there's no totally horrible starter in the Jays rotation (i.e., pitching at a Kevin Brown level of performance :snicker: ). Lilly has been hit hard at times, but at other times has looked good, and Bush has had some streaks in which he sets down one batter after another.

And Rosario and Gaudin are looking good in AAA, and Marcum and Banks are looking good in AA. Starting pitching is not likely to be a problem for the Jays any time soon.
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:39 AM EDT (#115522) #
Speaking of Bill Simmons, this just may be the greatest baseball article ever written.
Jobu - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:39 AM EDT (#115524) #
Well at least we know those two are kept busy. I'm still suspicious of J.K. Simmons though... always up to no good.
Dr. Phil - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 11:40 AM EDT (#115525) #
Since we were talking about the Yank's here and their struggles, we could say that they pretty much need everything and have money to take almost everyone. Who would we be willing to trade. I wouldn't trade Sparky unless it was an overwhelming offer, although I just love his hustle. What about trying to trade Speier? Maybe Cat, which would then let us bring up Gross. What about some of the syracuse pitchers, Miller, Arnold, Spike, Naninni(sp?) although once again who would we want from the yanks?
**disclaimer** I'm not saying that we will trade with the yanks, or anything like that. I am also enjoying the fact that the yanks right now are struggling mightily and would rather keep a player than try to help out the yanks and have them turn it all around after a trade.
R Billie - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 12:11 PM EDT (#115530) #
I've seen definate improvement in Towers this year. Outside of the Texas game where he didn't have much command he's not only been hitting his spots but his stuff seems to have picked up just a tick or two. His fastball has a bit more movement to it and his slider seems like a new pitch. It's not overpowering but it has very good movement and seems to be hard for hitters to square up.

He's going to need his defence to be there for him on most nights. And maybe on a warmer night some of those drives to the warning track end up in the first couple of rows in the stands. But as long as he keeps pitching this way he can be a solid contributor, a second David Bush in the rotation. The Jays right now might have the best number 1 pitcher in the division as well as the best performance at numbers 3 through 5.

They really do need another bat or three though. I am far from satisfied with the offence (although it's clear they have performed better under Brantley). They can't depend on the Josh Towers in the rotation to beat opponents like the Orioles 1-0 on a consistent basis.
Brian W - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 12:19 PM EDT (#115532) #
Thanks Moffatt for the Simmons link. That is simply a fantastic article.
NYJaysFan36 - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 01:04 PM EDT (#115539) #
Is anyone planning on going to the Sunday game against the Sox?
Any cheer club action?
I just decided today that since I'll be in Buffalo on Saturday, I'll just shoot up and stay overnight for the Sunday game.
According to the rotation projections, it'll be Chacin on the hill that day.
groove - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 01:07 PM EDT (#115540) #
About the Halladay rotation, I totally agree with getting him out there every 5 days. In the long run, I would definitely rather have more Halladay starts than anyone else on the team. Also, if my memory serves me correctly, I think that he actually pitches better when he doesn't have extra days rest. If the rotation starts struggling, I wouldn't be opposed to using him occasionally on 3 days rest.

Flex - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 01:19 PM EDT (#115545) #
Wow, Buffalo must really be a miserable place if you have to shoot up before you can stay the night.
uglyone - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 01:43 PM EDT (#115553) #
[i]It would be a surprise if the Jays end up the season with a team ERA under 4, but it is no longer unthinkable.[/i]

You know, even before the season, the only pitchers that I thought were unlikely to get near or under 4.00era were Towers, Chacin, and the relievers not named Batista/Speier/Frasor/Schoeneweis/Chulk.
Mike Green - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 01:49 PM EDT (#115556) #

No AL team had an ERA below 4.00 last year.

NYJaysFan36 - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 02:29 PM EDT (#115564) #
Flex,

It is indeed pretty brutal. And I have no experience shooting up. :) Which is precisely why I'm staying in Richmond Hill.
Bid - Wednesday, May 04 2005 @ 03:36 PM EDT (#115589) #
Yes, Bill Simmons is funny as Jim Bouton...and for anyone who missed this one M delight...

http://proxy.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?id=1240657
Jays 1, Orioles 0 | 37 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.