Cat
Zaun
Hillenbrand
Koskie
Wells
Hinske
Rios
Hudson
Adams
Damon
Nixon
Ramirez
Ortiz
Millar
Renteria
Varitek
Vazquez
Bellhorn
Manny hits it onto the Pike. Wow.
that could have been a very very dangerous situation, and now it's all clear.
defense is important.
It seemed with Hinske at third they never were able to turn it.
He doesn't have that Harwell/Scully "magic," but if everyone called games like this, nobody would complain. One weird tidbit: He sounds eerily like Van Miller, former radio voice of the Buffalo Bills.
It's a misconception that there are ties.
I'll take it! Vernon hits a 2-run shot.
(GREAT game from koskie today).
Hinske on 1st, no out, tie game, 8th inning.....there's the time for smallball.
We must respect its powers and only use it for single players/coaches who are going throuigh slumps ;)
Hey NFH, you got a picture of J.P?
There's only downside.
I would bring him back for the ninth.
Butterfield, you ARE playing at Fenway, just in case you forgot.
do we have his stats splits for DH/3B duties?
Ortiz up 1st.
This is one helluva test for our "closer".
I agree with you. If Reed stops at third, Koskie at least has a sac fly situation, and a basehit could probably score two. I didn't think Reed had a chance at scoring as soon as I saw him rounding third. Bad move, even though the Jays ended up scoring anyways.
Their on the road, playing for win, plus the chance that it may be your only chance.
Although Koskie and Wells were coming up...
I don't agree. All Koskie would have to do is hit a medium fly ball, and Johnson scores on a sac fly. I don't see how it was their "only chance."
Moot point though now. Batista gets Ortiz and I stop sweating a little bit. :)
who was praising this joker behind the plate today?
An amazing game - heart attacks along the way, but that's the way an entertaining game goes. Solid start from Roy and Batista, while bumpy, gets the job done and that's what counts.
Koskie is officially back on, and things are looking up once more after that short slide by the team.
miguel pulls through
(He said, still trembling).
stop the losing streak.
still haven't lost a series.
Roy the stopper (in fenway no less).
Right back into 1st or 2nd place.
finish the road trip with a winning record (5-4).
and a nice close from Batista in as pressured a situation as an april game can give you.
that's a sweet win all around. it would have been a tough, tough loss if we didn't pull it out.
Sadly I missed 99.9% of the game, but what a tense (but nice!) surprise to home to. Huge, huge win for the Jays, and judging by the box score and this thread, they really had to work for it.
An amazing game - heart attacks along the way, but that's the way an entertaining game goes. Solid start from Roy and Batista, while bumpy, gets the job done and that's what counts.
Koskie is officially back on, and things are looking up once more after that short slide by the team.
On a relevant note, this is a great tone for the team to come back home for.
As a semi-relevant note, I may have found a replacement for the O-drum. Stay tuned.
I'm not sure if Mac makes that play.
I think the more interesting question is whether Hinske picks that out of the dirt. (of course he would have been safe anyway)
Nice win!
The icing on the cake: D-Rays 6, Yanks 2
I'd also have to say that Shea is better at scooping balls than Hinske is so far this year.
Also, hats off to Russ Adams and Shea Hillenbrand for having GREAT nights in the field. Scott Hatteberg has been robbed of his nickname 'The Pickin Machine'. Hillenbrand was pickin em left and right tonight, and he definitely deserves credit.
But finally, Corey Koskie was the STAR of the day. If he were a Yankee, he definitely would have "earned his stripes" tonight.
Good job boys, Butterfield is probably the happiest guy on the planet.
And how about pitching Batista for that nothing inning in Texas? It kept him sharp for today.
Some things have been odd; i.e. John MacDonald pinch hitting, Vernon sitting during a crucial PH situation against Texas on Sunday. But who knows how much good that day off did Vernon? He homered today.
It's interesting to see how he handles Halladay. Halladay seems like a tough guy to manage. He's super competitive, which is great; but he also likes to call his own shots.
And think how seamless he's getting everyone playing. Remember in the off-season there was a lot of boo-hooing around here about we have too many position players; it looks like everyone's getting chances to hit, to field (and how good is Shea with the glove? Very impressive), and to come in the game right when they can do their best.
So far, high marks for Gibbons. He's the anti-Tosca for our times.
The bonus of going 8 innings is that the bullpen, with the exception of Batista of course, got a full day's rest after consectutive games where the starter got bombed early.
Mac does have great range and very quick feet and actions but eventhough he gets to his feet quickly from what I've seen he doesn't plant to throw a seed to first. Instead he throws off balance as he's getting up with a lot of arc so the throw tends to take a little extra time to get there. On that play I don't think he would have made it unless you argue that he would have had a better jump on the ball and wouldn't have had to dive for it.
I'm not sure Adams could have done anything better except nailing Shea in the chest with a seed. That's a play where having a cannon arm like Rollins has would have made the difference but I don't think Mac has that kind of arm.
Bring on the Bombers!
Today - Halladay didn't want to intentionally walk Nixon when he was asked to, and was subsequently removed for the 9th
Sunday - Vernon not playing to his ability, possibly preoccupied with being around friends and family in Arlington, sits the final game in Texas. (That Vernon wasn't even used to pinch hit in that game tells me that move was on principle.)
My guess is that Gibbons is a buddy-buddy kinda guy and that players may neglect to observe his authority, and that's what some of these moves are partially about.
I hate exams.
Do you see Gibbons as making moves to assert his authority... My guess is that Gibbons is a buddy-buddy kinda guy and that players may neglect to observe his authority, and that's what some of these moves are partially about.
That's a good point, although I think Halladay would have come out anyway since the top of the inning was fairly long. As for Wells, I think you are on to something.
For the record I didn't like the idea of intentionally walking Nixon. You don't have to give him much to hit, but with two strikes I would much rather give yourself a chance to get the K.
I thought about the defensive sub in the 9th as well, but I didn't think of it until AFTER the play...so who am I to judge Gibbons.
His only other play would have been to bounce up and rush the throw before he fully has his feet under him. That's the kind of throw MacDonald tends to make and although he's fairly accurate with the extra arc the ball would have taken there was no way he would have got the runner at first. Adams' throw would have been bang bang if Shea had been able to pick it.
If it's automatic (and it has been so far) that Sparky comes in for Cat in that situation, then I think MacDonald has to go in too.I disagree. The difference between Mac making a play that Adams can't VS Sparky making a play that Cat can't, is that the play Sparky makes in most cases saves you extra bases, whereas a play that Mac makes and Adams does not, is probably only a single.
(For the record, I firmly believe MacDonald should be on this team and should be used as a late inning defensive replacement and get a start once every 10 days to spell Adams against a tough lefty like Santana, Johnson, etc.)
Is anybody else still waiting for their Starpass(es) to arrive? Ordered 26th March, told to give names at the box office when I picked up opener tickets... went to the box office and they had my pass but told me to call and give the names for the others and said they would be mailed out.
Called my Jays rep three weeks ago Thursday, left a message detailing the other names. My call has not been returned and I have not received my passes. The passes have also not been charged to my Visa yet.
6-4-3 and I were hoping to catch the Yankees this week but without passes... I've left another message with our Jays rep tonight. Anybody else still waiting?
I have been a little disappointed about Adams usage so far this year. I completely agree with what Jordan and a few others have been harping on in the last few days about MacDonald being used as a pinch hitter for Adams almost automatically as soon as a lefty is called into the game. That shouldn't happen at all, yet it's been a trend on this road trip. I think Adams deserves the chance and should be starting against most lefties. I don't expect him to start against the Santana and Randy Johnson's of the world, but there's no reason he shouldn't be given the opportunity to face the Kenny Rogers (like last week) and Jamie Moyer's of the world just because they are left handed.
I went to Gate 9, they just had a second one with my name on it (the guy said it was supposed to be "Guest", oh well). They didn't even tell me it would be there.
Anyhow, I think you need to get on their cases about the second free one. They'll give it to you, but it's probably bottom priority for them if you don't make yourself a pain the rear. I think Mike Hook is the top of the ladder in that office.
I agree with that too BC Mike, but you still haven't answered the previous question?.
Is the other question why is Mac on the team?
I'm with you on how Adams has been pulled too much in favour of the L/R matchup(but I'll give Gibbons the benefit of the doubt for now, since almost everygame has been close). As for why Mac is on the team I would ask, would you rather have Chris Woodward's bat, or John MacDonald's glove? I'd take Mac's glove and use one of the bullpen spots for the 5th outfielder/utility infielder.
Basically without an extra bat on the bench, the reward of defensive replacements is often overshadowed by the risk of diminishing your offence in crucial situations.
the reward of defensive replacements is often overshadowed by the risk of diminishing your offence in crucial situations.
As we saw tonight with Jay Payton batting for Manny Ramirez in the 9th with runners on the corners.
As it turns out, Francona says that Ramirez' thigh tightened up and he came out to get it iced.
Blue Jays roster move, from mlb.com:
Following their victory Tuesday, the Jays optioned right-handed reliever Brandon League, who allowed three hits, two walks and two runs Monday in 2 2/3 innings, to Triple-A Syracuse and purchased the contract of Matt Whiteside.
I went to Gate 9, they just had a second one with my name on it (the guy said it was supposed to be "Guest", oh well). They didn't even tell me it would be there.
I figured that might be the case.
Another pass question: when I was at the box office she was saying that the other three passes (we ordered four in total) may just be sent out all in my name. If this happens, how are the other three people expected to pick tickets up? We certainly won't always be attending games together.
We'll see if I get a call tomorrow or not. Who knows!
I agree, I already said that MacDonald should be one this team. But, if your answer to your own question is MacDonald's glove, I still don't understand how you don't advocate putting him in as a defensive replacement in a one run game. You said yourself that Mac's on the team because of his glove, when are you going to use his glove if you don't use it tonight?
Anyone know if they plan on putting him into the rotation? Or will they just stick with him being a reliever?
Here's hoping his future is in the starting rotation.
Whiteside is a 37 year old righty and has been average or below for his major league career. He does have experience on his side. And he can probably be sent up and down without fear of affecting his confidence.
If they are sending League down to pitch a lot of innings or stretch out as a starter then great. I think that's the best thing for him this season whether or not they think he's a starter long term. Right now he doesn't have nearly the command and consistency required to dominate as he should be with the type of stuff he has.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050420/JAYS20FINAL/TPSports/Baseball
Topic 2: A friend sent me this nickname for Batista, CSI because there are bodies left everywhere when he pitches.
http://www.syracuse.com/skychiefs/poststandard/index.ssf?/base/sports-1/111398630921261.xml
However, Gibbons and Ricciardi have to have a lengthy chat with League before he leaves, to make sure he doesn't go all Adam Peterson on them. Explain to him what his role in the organization is, what's expected of him, and that the Jays want to see him in the big-league rotation soon. I'm sure this has already been done.
I am, of course, not happy that the Jays promoted another reliever rather than an extra bat. But I've beaten that horse quite long enough.
I think it bears mentioning that Adams had made 2-3 very nice defensive plays during the game already, which had to factor into Gibbons' thinking.
I ordered two Star Passes for my girlfriend and I back in late February and they still screwed up my order. After a few calls to my "sales rep" (I use that term very loosely), I had only one of my passes couriered to me, not two, and both are in my name to begin with. So I had to pick up the second pass at the window before the 2nd game of the season. They also screwed up my order last year when I ordered my passes in October of the previous season and I wound up picking them up at the Box Office anyway. To say I'm not happy with Ted Rogers and company would be an understatement. Fortunately, the team on the field is a lot more competent.
Good move sending League down.I agree with the move but I'm surprised it's Whiteside coming up. I thought Whiteside's role was chiefly (pardon the pun) to help out Syracuse and only help the big club in case of a dire emergency, like a rash of injuries. Also, with the need for another lefty in the pen, I thought Burnside would've been called up to ease Schoeneweis' load a little bit. Mark Lukasiewicz, the former SkyChief, who is now the colour man on the Syracuse radio broadcasts, recently mentioned that Burnside would be a good candidate for a call-up.
In general, I agree. However, at this moment, with the starters getting pulled early in 2 of the last 3, the Yankees & O's offense coming to town, and one off day between now and May 5th I don't think it's a bad idea.
I agree with the decision to call up another pitcher. With Bush and Towers not pitching deep into games this past week, we should get used to that. That's what happens with young pitchers.
"League wasn't getting enough work," Jays general manager J.P. Ricciardi said. "With Syracuse we'll stretch him out, he'll start."
Why the switch from a reliever and potential closer?
"Whatever role he ends up with (in the big leagues) it's better to have him starting there and pitching every fifth day," Ricciardi said. "He just needs work."
I think Jordon is assesment is pretty accurate, but throw in the fact that many of us and perhaps Ricciardi were not completely confident that Batista was going to be the real deal. Maybe League was up to both see how he would fare, as well in the event of closer problems either take over the role or move up the chain.
Batista's position is secure now so Ricciardi's has more flexibility. League will no doubt benefit more from getting loads of innings under his belt now. He could turn out to be a plus starter and if the need arises its easier to set up a return to the pen than the other way around.
The call up of Whiteside to me is pretty simple. Short term arm with no worries of either getting him through loosing him if he was to return to the Chiefs.
Granted that an extra bullpen arm would be helpful in the short term (although I also was surprised not to see Lundberg or Burnside instead). I can only hope this promotion also means Russ Adams gets to face a left-hander once in a while.
I hate it when I feel like I'm inside Ricciardi's head.
I'm sure he feels the same way. :-)
Pistol asked whether Koskie has turned double plays at a better rate than Hinske did last year. Koskie has turned 5 in 8 games, a pace which is completely unsustainable (he'd blow the record for DPs flipped by a 3B to smithereens). Hinske turned 23 in 153 games last year. That is a below average, but not terrible, rate. Koskie actually started only 14 in 112 games last year.
Fielding stats are no longer accessible on espn.com, but current year stats are readily available on mlb.com, and historical fielding stats can be obtained most readily through baseballreference.com. Here is the 2004 AL 3B fielding summary from br.
And I'm sure one of JP's staff have already run my last comment over to him and he is shuddering as we speak.
Not asking facetiously, but how many current closers were once hyped as "closers of the future"?
Seems to me that many are just failed starters. Gagne and Rivera jump immediately to mind.
But, if your answer to your own question is MacDonald's glove, I still don't understand how you don't advocate putting him in as a defensive replacement in a one run game. You said yourself that Mac's on the team because of his glove, when are you going to use his glove if you don't use it tonight?
Again I'll go back to the point of just because he is on the team for his glove, doesn't mean you have to use him in every close game. Adams needs to play in pressure situations. And it's not like Gibbons has had a hard time getting Mac into the lineup.