Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine

The Blue Jays will be selecting 6th in the 2005 Draft next summer. Some of the top candidates the Jays may select were discussed previously.

Previously, Mike Moffatt looked at the history of the 6th pick in the draft going back until 1965.

While the Jays will be selecting 6th in the draft I wanted to take a broader look at the players selected in previous drafts. So I went back, using The Baseball Cube as a resource, and looked at the players drafted from pick 6 through pick 15 from the ten drafts in the 90s.

There were a few reasons I chose to do this.

* The Jays will have their choice from every player in the draft, except the top 5 players, when they select.

* Generally, there is somewhat of a consensus to who the top picks are in a draft, so 6-15 would be a reasonable pool that the Jays are selecting from.

* The period from 1990-1999 gave me 100 players to look at.

* Drafts from 2000-2004 are still a bit too early to know what to expect out of each player drafted.

Below is a listing of picks 6-15 of the ten drafts between 1990-1999. 'Level' refers to the highest level that the player achieved in their pro career (if it's blank they didn't have a pro career). All other columns should be self explanatory.


Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1999	6	Josh Girdley	P	A	
1999	7	Kyle Snyder	P	MLB	2003-2003
1999	8	Bobby Bradley	P	AA	
1999	9	Barry Zito	P	MLB	2000-2004
1999	10	Ben Sheets	P	MLB	2001-2004
1999	11	R Christianson	C	AAA	
1999	12	Brett Myers	P	MLB	2002-2004
1999	13	Mike Paradis	P	AAA	
1999	14	Ty Howington	P	AA	
1999	15	Jason Stumm	P	AA	

Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1998	6	Ryan Mills	P	AAA	
1998	7	Austin Kearns	OF	MLB	2002-2004
1998	8	Felipe Lopez	3B	MLB	2001-2004
1998	9	Sean Burroughs	3B	MLB	2002-2004
1998	10	Carlos Pena	1B	MLB	2001-2004
1998	11	Josh McKinley	IF	AA	
1998	12	Adam Everett	SS	MLB	2001-2004
1998	13	J.M. Gold	P	A	
1998	14	Jeff Weaver	P	MLB	1999-2004
1998	15	Clint Johnston	1B	A	

Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1997	6	Geoff Goetz	P	AA	
1997	7	Dan Reichert	P	MLB	1999-2003
1997	8	J.J. Davis	1B-P	MLB	2002-2004
1997	9	Michael Cuddyer	SS	MLB	2002-2004
1997	10	Jon Garland	P	MLB	2000-2004
1997	11	Chris Enochs	P	AAA	
1997	12	Aaron Akin	P		
1997	13	Kyle Peterson	P	MLB	1999-2001
1997	14	Brandon Larson	SS	MLB	2001-2004
1997	15	Jason Dellaero	SS	MLB	1999-1999

Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1996	6	Seth Greisinger	P	MLB	1998-2004
1996	7	Matt White	P	AAA	
1996	8	Chad Green	OF	AAA	
1996	9	Mark Kotsay	OF	MLB	1997-2004
1996	10	Eric Chavez	3B	MLB	1998-2004
1996	11	Adam Eaton	P	MLB	2000-2004
1996	12	Bobby Seay	P	MLB	2001-2004
1996	13	Robert Stratton	OF	AAA	-
1996	14	Dermal Brown	OF	College	
1996	15	Matt Halloran	SS		

Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1995	6	Jaime Jones	OF	AAA	
1995	7	Jon Johnson     P	MLB	1998-2003
1995	8	Todd Helton	1B-P	MLB	1997-2004
1995	9	Geoff Jenkins	OF	MLB	1998-2004
1995	10	Chad Hermansen	SS	MLB	1999-2004
1995	11	Mike Drumright	P	AAA	
1995	12	Matt Morris	P	MLB	1997-2004
1995	13	Mark Redman	P	MLB	1999-2004
1995	14	Reggie Taylor	OF	MLB	2000-2003
1995	15	Andy Yount	P	A	

Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1994	6	M. Christensen	OF	MLB	1999-2002
1994	7	Doug Million	P		
1994	8	Todd Walker	2B	MLB	1996-2004
1994	9	C.J. Nitkowski	P	MLB	1995-2004
1994	10	Jaret Wright	P	MLB	1997-2004
1994	11	Mark Farris	SS		
1994	12	N Garciaparra	SS	MLB	1996-2004
1994	13	Paul Konerko	C	MLB	1997-2004
1994	14	Jason Varitek	OF	MLB	1997-2004
1994	15	Jayson Peterson	P	

Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1993	6	S. Soderstrom	P	MLB	1996-1996
1993	7	Trot Nixon	OF	MLB	1996-2004
1993	8	Kirk Presley	P		
1993	9	Matt Brunson	SS		
1993	10	B. Kieschnick	OF-P	MLB	1996-2004
1993	11	Daron Kirkreit	P		
1993	12	Billy Wagner	P	MLB	1995-2004
1993	13	Matt Drews	P	AAA	
1993	14	Derrek Lee	1B	MLB	1997-2004
1993	15	Chris Carpenter	P	MLB	1997-2004
	
Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1992	6	Derek Jeter	SS	MLB	1995-2004
1992	7	Calvin Murray	OF	MLB	1999-2004
1992	8	Pete Janicki	P		
1992	9	Preston Wilson	SS	MLB	1998-2004
1992	10	Michael Tucker	SS	MLB	1995-2004
1992	11	Derek Wallace	P	MLB	1996-1999
1992	12	Kenny Felder	OF		
1992	13	Chad McConnell	OF		
1992	14	Ron Villone	P	MLB	1995-2004
1992	15	Sean Lowe	P	MLB	1997-2003

Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1991	6	John Burke	P	MLB	1996-1997
1991	7	Joe Vitiello	OF-1B	MLB	1995-2003
1991	8	Joey Hamilton	P	MLB	1994-2003
1991	9	Mark Smith	OF	MLB	1994-2003
1991	10	Tyler Green	P	MLB	1993-1998
1991	11	Shawn Estes	P	MLB	1995-2004
1991	12	Doug Glanville	OF	MLB	1996-2004
1991	13	Manny Ramirez	3B-OF	MLB	1993-2004
1991	14	Cliff Floyd	1B	MLB	1993-2004
1991	15	Tyrone Hill	P		

Year	Pick	Player	        Pos.	Level	MLB Exp
1990	6	Marc Newfield	1B	MLB	1993-1998
1990	7	Dan Wilson	C	MLB	1992-2004
1990	8	Tim Costo	SS	MLB	1992-1993
1990	9	Ron Walden	P		
1990	10	Carl Everett	OF	MLB	1993-2004
1990	11	Shane Andrews	3B	MLB	1995-2002
1990	12	Todd Ritchie	P	MLB	1997-2004
1990	13	Donovan Osborne	P	MLB	1992-2004
1990	14	Todd Van Poppel	P	MLB	1991-2004
1990	15	Adam Hyzdu	OF	MLB	2000-2004

As you can see, even with the 6th pick in the draft there's still a lot of hit or miss in the early parts of round 1.

Based on my personal rankings there were 8 top players selected in these 100 picks. HS notes that the players were selected out of high school and C notes that the players were drafted out of college:

Top Tier
Chavez - HS

Garciaparra - C

Helton - C

Jeter - HS

Ramirez - HS

Sheets - C

Wagner - C

Zito - C

Hitters - 5 (3 HS, 2 C)
Pitchers - 3 (0 HS, 3 C)

After those top 8 there was a next tier of above average players that had 9 players in it:

Above Average
Everett - HS

Floyd - HS

Konerko - HS

Lee, D - HS

Morris - C

Nixon - HS

Varitek - C

Weaver - C

Wilson, Pr - HS

Hitters - 7 (6 HS, 1 C)
Pitchers - 2 (0 HS, 2 C)

And after that there was a mixed bag of about 10 players that are average to above average:

Solid Players
Carpenter - HS

Eaton - HS

Jenkins - C

Kearns - HS

Kotsay - C

Myers, B - HS

Nixon - HS

Redman - C

Walker, T - C

Wright, J - HS

Hitters - 5 (2 HS, 3 C)
Pitchers - 5 (4 HS, 1 C)

(Side Note - These rankings were not made on any quantitative analysis, it's simply my perception of the players. There could certainly be arguments that certain players aren't in the appropriate group, or not included in a group at all.)

Of the 100 players picked from 6-15 there were 27 players that were at least solid, 17 that were at least above average, and 8 players that were All Star caliber players.

In total of the 100 players, 67 made the majors for at least a cup of coffee.

So with the 6th pick in the draft the Jays, assuming average drafting ability, have roughly a:

* 1 in 10 chance of drafting an All Star level player

* 2 in 10 chance of drafting at least an above average player

* 3 in 10 chance of drafing at least a solid player

* 7 in 10 chance of drafting a player that will at least make the majors

College vs. High School

Breaking things out by whether a player was drafted out of college or high school for the 27 solid or better players looks like this:

Note:

CP= College pitchers
CH = College hitters

HSP = High School hitters

HSH = High School hitters

> Ave = At least average

> AA = At least above average

> AS = At least All Star level

Total = number of players drafted
Draft	CP	CH	HSP	HSH	Total
> Ave	6	6	4	11	27
Total	28	22	23	27	100
%	21%	27%	17%	41%	27%

Among players that were at least average players the most success came from hitters drafted out of high school and the least success came from high school pitchers.

Draft	CP	CH	HSP	HSH	Total
> AA	5	3	0	9	17
Total	28	22	23	27	100
%	18%	14%	0%	33%	17%

For above average players high school hitters still show the best success rate, and high school pitchers show no success rate. College players have roughly the same success as the total player pool.

Draft	CP	CH	HSP	HSH	Total
> AS	3	2	0	3	8
Total	28	22	23	27	100
%	11%	9%	0%	11%	8%

Going up to the All Star level players starts to even out among college players and high school hitters - each having about a 10% success rate.

Based on the 10 drafts of the 90s, from picks 6-15, there's:

* Roughly an equal chance of getting an All Star player from college players and high school hitters.

* Very little success with drafting high school pitchers.

* Most success drafting high school hitters.

The Jays have generally shied away from drafting high school players, especially in the early rounds. However, based on this limited study there's been recent success with drafting high school hitters in the early part of the first round.

On the other hand avoiding high school pitchers in the early parts of round one seems like a sound strategy.

While the Jays have yet to draft a high school player in the early rounds in the JP draft era, they have indicated that they would be willing to draft 'the right player' if the opportunity presented itself.

Obviously, however, each draft class is unique. Some drafts will have stronger players among college players while others will be strong in high school players. So the trends of the past decade won't necessarily hold up in a particular year.

Baseball America projected the top 10 back in October. The top of the list were 2 high school players - Justin Upton and Cameron Maybin, followed by 8 college players. Based on that it appears that the Jays will wind up with a college player at their pick at #6.

Regardless of college or high school, or pitchers or hitters, it's less than 50/50 to get a solid player with a pick as high as #6 in the draft.

Early Draft Picks in the 90s | 21 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
NDG - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 08:40 AM EST (#103296) #
What I find interesting is that just about anyone who became 'useful' was in the majors within three years of being drafted. Hence this year looks like we will figure out just how good JP's 2002 draft was.
Mick Doherty - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 10:06 AM EST (#103297) #
Wow, "hit and miss" is an understatemnt -- I am personally surprised at how awesomely underwhelming that list is. (Freudian typo to refer to the bottom tier of players as a "mixed bad." Heh.)

Of the 100 players, only three could even get into a perimeter dicussion about the Hall of Fame right now -- Jeter, Nomar and Helton (Apologies to Zito and Chavez who are nice players, but ...) And none of those three are exactly "pantheon" players. I realize great players aren't easy to come by, but this seems to me to be exceedingly low.

Jonny German - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 10:19 AM EST (#103299) #
a perimeter dicussion about the Hall of Fame right now -- Jeter, Nomar and Helton

There's a Mr. Ramirez on Line 1 for you, Mick...
Mick Doherty - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 10:48 AM EST (#103302) #
Doh! I knew I'd miss someone if I made that claim. And he's probably the best candidate of the four. But still doesn't materially change my point.
philly - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 10:49 AM EST (#103303) #
Fun study. I think you mislabeled a player though. You've got a "Myers, B" from College and it looks like that's Brett Myers from the Phillies, right? He's a HS player.

That narrows the difference for decent (forgot your term) C vs HS pitchers, but doesn't change the overall point any.

And although he missed your cutoff range by a bit, give a mention to Roy Halladay out of a HS at pick #17.
Pistol - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 11:22 AM EST (#103312) #
I initially thought Brett Myers was a HS pick, but he's listed at Baseball Cube as a draftee from Jacksonville University.

http://www.sports-wired.com/draft/draft.asp?Y=1999&P=June-Reg
Craig B - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 11:29 AM EST (#103313) #
Baseball Cube is wrong. Myers was drafted as a HS senior out of Englewood HS in Jacksonville.
Pistol - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 12:02 PM EST (#103319) #
Everything should be updated now to reflect Myers as a HS draftee.
R Billie - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 01:00 PM EST (#103325) #
I think this clearly shows there is no reason to shy away from high school hitters at any point in the draft, assuming you can identify the ones who are skilled as well as tooled. The Jays did a good job of this in selecting players like Green and Wells. So if you have an 18 year old who appears to have the potential to be a star next to a 21 year old who appears to be solid, there's probably little reason not to roll the dice with the star potential. You have to trust scouting over performance a lot more in this case but the results say you have an equal chance of finding star talent and a much greater chance of finding at least solid talent.

The reluctance to draft high school pitchers on the other seems to be well founded. Though I still don't think that means you shy away from an 18 year old pitcher if he shows the full package (stuff, command, mentality, projectability) depending on what other type of talent is available at the time.

Picking #6 probably puts the Jays out of range of picking any of the "no brainer" players like Upton, Maybin, and Gordon. But it should make them more comfortable to pick exactly the player they want from the remaining players no matter how Baseball America or other publications happen to rank them. If there's a Michael Aubrey type of bat available then there's no harm in overdrafting a little.

Named For Hank - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 01:06 PM EST (#103326) #
I don't think that the Jays were avoiding High School hitters because they're risky -- wasn't it because college players would be ready to help much more quickly?

Now that the system appears well-stocked I imagine we'll see more high schoolers picked, if they're there to be picked.
Pistol - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 01:44 PM EST (#103331) #
"I think this clearly shows there is no reason to shy away from high school hitters at any point in the draft"

One thing about this study is that it's a relatively small sample size with regards to HS & college hitters & pitchers. There's only 20-30 of each here. Even just switching Myers from college to HS had a noticable change.

One thing I've wondered is if there's a difference between scouting HS and college players. Perhaps there's teams that can simply scout HS players better than other teams, and on the other side maybe there's teams that scout college players better other teams.
R Billie - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 02:19 PM EST (#103334) #
I imagine it's easier to scout colleges just because there are fewer of them and there's a lot more data available on each player. You basically have most of the player pool that hasn't been drafted out of high school going to the college and junior college programs.

In the case of high school players beyond the first tier of talent it has to be hard because there are so many schools and the major league level talent is spread out all over the country. If you're trying to dig for hidden gems at the high school level I imagine it would involve a lot of work.

There is a point to be made about college hitters usually being ready faster for the big leagues but that's not necessarily true about the top level of talent. Compare Gabe Gross and Casey Kotchman. Both drafted the same year, both have yet to see the majors regularly but both are equally ready to see major league pitching and Kotchman is still 3 years younger and projects as the better player long term. If not for injuries you could argue he would be well ahead of Gross.

Hank Blalock made the majors by age 21, Eric Chavez made it within 3 years, as did Ramirez, and others. It depends on the type of talent you have; not all 18 year olds will develop in the same time frame. If you can identify high school hitters who already have polished skills and project to grow in strength and ability then they don't necessarily take that much longer. I'd rather wait an extra year for a better player.
Mike Green - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 02:56 PM EST (#103340) #
I agree. There is nothing wrong with drafting a top level high school hitter. Unfortunately, there are apparently only one or two of those in this year's class, and they are likely to be gone when #6 comes up in 2005.

High school pitchers are a whole different ball of wax. Better off generally to pass on 'em for the David Bushes and Josh Bankses in the 2nd round, and take a college hitter in the first round.
Chuck - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 03:03 PM EST (#103341) #
BP has listed their top 50 prospects. Quiroz ranks #41. Adams has to settle for an honourable mention, not cracking the top 50.

The top five overall:
1. Andy Marte, 3B, Atlanta
2. Delmon Young, OF, Tampa Bay
3. Felix Hernandez, RHP, Seattle
4. Dallas McPherson, 3B, Anaheim
5. Casey Kotchman, 1B, Anaheim
Chuck - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 03:04 PM EST (#103342) #
Oops. Didn't notice it was posted in their free section. Have a look here.
Wildrose - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 03:53 PM EST (#103345) #
Good research Pistol.

How to obtain premium players? I've always been partial to drafting good athletes then teaching them the game (the Pat Gillick in me I guess). Case in point Cory Koskie. As a youngster Koskie was an outstanding volleyball player (brother on Canada's national team I believe) and a good enough hockey goalie ,to be offered a D-1 scholarship . Baseball was a secondary sport for him ,and almost by blind luck pursued this option. Drafted in the 26th. round in 1994 he's turned into a very solid pro.

I believe the scouting pendulum has swung towards performance over tools, and in the early rounds atleast I basically agree with this precept. In the later rounds however, I'd be pursuing broad spectrum athletes who've had relatively short exposure to baseball training. I think you can find a lot of such players in Canada.( Larry Walker, Rich Harden, being two such examples)



Skills - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 05:13 PM EST (#103346) #
So does anyone have any idea as to who the top notch talent will be around the Jays' #6 pick? Also, does anyone have an inkling of what the Jays are looking for, as in hitting or pitching, or just the best available talent?
NDG - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 06:25 PM EST (#103350) #

There is a point to be made about college hitters usually being ready faster for the big leagues but that's not necessarily true about the top level of talent.

As I said earlier, I think this is shown not to be true.

Only three of the 15 HS useful players listed took more than three years (Carpenter, Lee, Wilson). A pretty good indication that good players will make the majors quickly HS or not

best400 - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 06:44 PM EST (#103351) #
You guys were right that the main reason why college pitchers were given foremost attention by JP is because of the higher number of stats, more games that can be scouted, and naturally because the competition is far stiffer and easier measured in college. It seems to be far more difficult to determine how good a talent a pitcher coming out of high school will be compared to a hitter. JP probably sacrificed some potential high school talent in order to replenish his minor league system
Pistol - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 08:46 PM EST (#103357) #
"So does anyone have any idea as to who the top notch talent will be around the Jays' #6 pick?"

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/2005draft/050131overview.html

I also did a piece a few months back that's linked at the top of this thread.
Michael - Wednesday, February 23 2005 @ 04:18 AM EST (#103368) #
One thing (in addition to small sample size) to remember with this is that you have to be careful with success rates and then recommendations on who to draft. It is possible that in the past college players were the better bet because too many teams were incorrectly over-drafting high school players. So the few college players (relatively speaking) that were selected tended to be better players. If all of a sudden you snapped your finger and no high school player was allowed to be selected in the first round by any team I imagine the hit percentage for college draft picks would go down quite a bit.
Early Draft Picks in the 90s | 21 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.