Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Last Thursday night, plate umpire Joe West called an illegal pitch (and consequently ball four) on a 3-2 pitch from Pirates starter Oliver Perez to Reggie Sanders of the Cardinals, leading off the second inning. Lloyd McClendon did his Interminable Argument Dance, even though Perez and the bench had earlier been warned about the illegal delivery. The Pirates played the rest of the game under protest; they won 3-2, making the protest moot. The aftereffects of the call, though, remain.


Welcome back, everyone, to the Land Of Selectively Applied Rules. Today's rule is Rule 8.01, "Legal Pitching Delivery".

Rule 8.01 specifies two legal deliveries, the Windup Position and the Set Position. (Those of you who, like me, were pitchers in little league will be familiar with this stuff.) A pitcher has to commit to one position or another when stepping on the pitcher's plate (the rubber), before assuming his delivery position; for the Set Position, you position your arm at your side, and for the Windup Position, you hold the ball in both hands in front of you. Doing so commits you irretrievably that position; the only way to assume the Windup Position and not pitch is to step off the rubber and throw to a base, or drop your hand to your side and step off the rubber.

We'll deal solely with the Windup Position because that's what Perez was using. Once the pitcher is in the Windup Position, any movement that is normally associated with his delivery commits him to the pitch without interruption or alteration. That's the extent of the rule against the Hesitation Pitch. The casebook for Rule 8.01 says that the Windup pitch must "be delivered in a continuous motion". That is, No Stopping.

The Hesitation Pitch was originated by Satchel Paige, who used it in lieu of a changeup (Satch didn't throw what we'd consider to be a regular change). Like any great pitch, the Hesitation Pitch works to destroy a hitter's timing; in Satch's case, he used to pause at the very top of his windup, with his foot at maximum or near-maximum height. He could pause for up to several seconds, though the pitch was most effective with a pause of a second or less, the sort of thing that can cause a batter to swing even before the pitch leave the pitcher's hand. Paige used the pitch for years, but when he joined the American League with the Browns in 1948, the pitch was almost immediately declared illegal, under Rule 8.01.

Since Paige, other pitchers have used the hesitation pitch; according to Rob Neyer, Frank Tanana tried it out many times in exhibitions, and probably used it when he felt he could get away with it. Reliever Steve Hamilton threw a pitch called the "Folly Floater", an eephus pitch with a hesitation delivery, and got away wth it for quite a while. Umpires probably were too focused on the eephus feature to worry about whether it was illegal; at any rate, it was probably considered unsporting to call such a pathetic pitch illegal.

Now Perez is using the pitch, making a double-clutch in his windup wherehe actually stops twice in his windup (at the top of the windup, and at his coiled part of the windup).

Pirates GM Dave Littlefield has now asked the Commissioner's Office for a ruling on whether Perez violates 8.01 when he "double pauses" during his wind-up. The Pirates admitting that Perez "double pauses" is in fact doubly damning, since any pause is against the rule on its face. West in fact cited Perez for stopping twice during his windup delivery.

This isn't the first time West has enforced this rule. He did the same thing to Satoru Komiyama (then of the Mets) in a spring game against the Expos; Komiyama threw some pitches with a hesitation delivery, and West (who was observing but not umpiring) later warned the pitcher his manager, Bobby Valentine, about the illegal hesitation delivery. At the time, though, Valentine was quite vocal about the selective application of Rule 8.01. Valentine is right; all kinds of pitcher rock side-to-side in their windup delivery (Valentine cited Kevin Brown, who makes a side-step in his windup that's illegal under 8.01) or come to a complete stop in their windup (I'm thinking of Steve Kline, who does this at least once every time I watch him on TV; I know there are others). It's unfortunate that the Rules Committee aren't more proactive in writing the rule book to fit the calls as made. Joe West is making the right call, but it's generating controversy because nobody can tell when the rules are going to be enforced.

All sorts of pitchers, maybe even most of them, have an illegal delivery anyway because they move their hands all over the place when settling into the windup position. This call is always let go, though, because these movements are a part of the pitcher's "natural delivery" and when the windup proper hasn't even beguin, it's harsh to call a delivery illegal.

Generally, the umpires are understandably reluctant to call a pitcher for an illegal pitch where there is no intent to deceive the hitter (as I think is the case with Kline, and certainly Brown). Whether Perez was attempting to throw off Sanders I cannot say; I didn't see the incident. However, it would cost MLB nothing, and pitchers would lose no sleep, if the rules on legal deliveries were properly enforced. Hopefully the Commissioner's Office can hand down a ruling on Perez that makes sense for all parties concerned, and hopefully we can eventually get Rule 8.01 to read as it's enforced.
The Hesitation Pitch | 17 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
_snellville jone - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 09:48 AM EDT (#39740) #
If I'm not mistaken, San Diego reliever Akinori Otsuka also uses this hesitation move.
_snellville jone - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 09:48 AM EDT (#39741) #
If I'm not mistaken, San Diego reliever Akinori Otsuka also uses this hesitation move.
_snellville jone - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 09:49 AM EDT (#39742) #
I'll second that.
_Ducey - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 10:29 AM EDT (#39743) #
Dumb question, but why don't they just allow the hestitation pitch, at least with no runners on. It seems to me that any way you can get the pitch over the plate should be fair game (except doing something to the ball).
_Jonny German - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 10:34 AM EDT (#39744) #
Thanks Craig. I find this particularly interesting as it relates to Perez, who has really stepped into his potential this year. How much of that is due to effective use of the hesitation delivery? My guess is "Not much", it probably has a lot more to do with going after hitters and thus cutting his walk rate substantially.

Snelville, I also recall talk of Otsuka using an illegal delivery earlier this season. Ironically, it was Bobby V doing the complaining. I don't think anything came of it, and whether Otsuka made changes or not he's continued to be very effective.
Mike Green - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 10:35 AM EDT (#39745) #
It's not a dumb question, Ducey. Deception is part and parcel of pitching, and it is strange to permit some types and not others. It's kind of like the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion.
_Nigel - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 10:47 AM EDT (#39746) #
Wow, interesting thread. I've been watching baseball for over 30 years and didn't realize this rule existed. This rule is the most inconsistantly applied rule ever. Watch some old video of Luis Tiant and see that he paused every 2nd or 3rd pitch. Hideo Nomo does it almost every pitch. Very cool. I'm going to watch for this now.
_Jonny German - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 10:47 AM EDT (#39747) #
Nevermind my Bobby V comment above... It was the Mets who complained, but obviously not Bobby V. You'd think I'd know that he isn't a Met any more, but you'd also think that I'd be fully awake at 10:30 on a Monday.
_Moffatt - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 10:50 AM EDT (#39748) #
There's a simple reason why this rule is almost never called. It's due to the first law of umpiring:

Do no harm

If a guy has an illegal delivery, but the other team doesn't notice it or doesn't care, why call it as an umpire? You're only going to get a whole lot of grief from the manager / pitching coach. If both teams don't care (which 98% of the time they don't), why should you care?
_Ryan Day - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 10:59 AM EDT (#39749) #
This kind of reminds me of Chris Michalak's pickoff/balk a few years back. None of the umps were calling it a balk until one or two managers started complaining. After that, Michalak couldn't even tie his shoes without getting called for a balk.

I agree with Ducey & Mike Green about the general oddness of enforcing stuff like this. If pitchers want to freak out batters, that's fine with me. I always enjoy watching pitches with unusual deliveries, regardless of whether they pause for 0.05 seconds.

How does Hideo Nomo figure into all of this? He's never seemed particularly "continuous" to me.
_snellville jone - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 11:01 AM EDT (#39750) #
What I don't understand is how teams will complain about certain things, like Otsuka's delivery or Tavarez's hat for example, but nothing will happen until weeks later in some other series.
_Moffatt - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 11:05 AM EDT (#39751) #
What I don't understand is how teams will complain about certain things, like Otsuka's delivery or Tavarez's hat for example, but nothing will happen until weeks later in some other series.

My guess would be that the umps tell the manager I dunno.. I'll have the league look into it when he complains. They go to the league, they debate it for a couple weeks, then a directive comes down to call it.

That'd be my guess.
Mike D - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 12:10 PM EDT (#39752) #
I'm currently drafting an article (to be posted on Da Box this week) on my baseball road trip. It'll include various notes and observations from the nine games I was lucky enough to attend.

Anyway, I saw Oliver Perez pitch in Pittsburgh, and here's the problem: he sometimes double-pauses. I'm actually really concerned for his mechanics and his health, since no two windups are the same for him. Occasionally, he looks fluid; other times, he pauses once; and sometimes, he pauses twice -- including a definite pause with his leg raised. Even when he looks in for the signs, he sometimes crouches over almost like a quarterback about to take a snap, and sometimes casually stands straight to begin his windup.

If he just had one consistent -- albeit funky -- delivery, then I think hitters could reasonably be expected to adjust to it. But because he only occasionally double-pauses, I think umpires will be more likely to call him for an illegal pitch than they would an Otsuka, Brown, Nomo, etc.
_Rob C - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 12:53 PM EDT (#39753) #
Can someone explain _why_ the rule exists? I mean, is it a fait accompli that any hesitation immediately creates an advantage for the pitcher? Hitters get to waggle the bat, call time just before the pitcher is about to throw, step out of the box between pitches and 'adjust' their batting gloves, scuff the back line of the box so you can't see it any more, lean into the strike zone with body armour, and take offense whenever a pitch comes within two feet of their heads.

Meanwhile, if the pitcher sneezes, it's a balk.

Seems to me the pendulum has swung well over to the batter's side. Wouldn't it be better to streamline the rules to eliminate the ones that don't consistently get called, or at least improve their definitions? While we're at it, let's get rid of the ones that don't make much sense, like the balk.
Craig B - Monday, August 23 2004 @ 01:29 PM EDT (#39754) #
If he just had one consistent -- albeit funky -- delivery, then I think hitters could reasonably be expected to adjust to it. But because he only occasionally double-pauses, I think umpires will be more likely to call him for an illegal pitch than they would an Otsuka, Brown, Nomo, etc.

This is exactly right. (Nomo is a good example, by the way, of an illegal delivery). If Perez used a consistent delivery, even if it were illegal, he'd be given the benefit of the doubt and the hitters would be asked to adjust.

if the pitcher sneezes, it's a balk

Look, I like basestealing, I think it's a great part of the game. If you want to eliminate basestealing, then go ahead and eliminate the balk rule, and let a pitcher throw to a base whenever he likes. Otherwise, I don't see how asking a pitcher to deliver a pitch once he's committed to a delivery, and not to fake throws to the bases, is overly onerous on the pitchers.

I think the balk and delivery rules make sense, because it's preserved a nice balance between the pitcher, hitter and baserunner, and there's wisdom in not changing rules where they work well. That's not to say I don't want to see the rulebook written as called (and vice versa); I do. But I don't want to see wholesale changes in the way the game is called without good reason (some of you will remember my freakout last year on the reversed-call fiasco in the Jays-Cardinals game; the result of MLB deciding to unilterally junk Rule 9.02).

Can someone explain _why_ the rule exists?

Because it's always existed. The requirement that a pitcher deliver the ball in a continuous motion has been a rule as long as there's been a rule about the pitcher's delivery. Is there any rhyme or reason to it? Not particularly, I guess... it's just the way the game is played. You might as well ask why the pitcher's plate is 60.5' from home.

It's not like baseball is trying to screw pitchers here. This has always been the rule; every young pitcher grows up learning how to deliver the baseball legally. None of this is hard stuff, either.

If Perez can't wind up without pausing, he should pitch from the stretch and be done with it.
robertdudek - Tuesday, August 24 2004 @ 06:41 PM EDT (#39755) #
I'd be in favour of limiting throws to bases to 3 for each batter at the plate (an old Bill James idea). I'd include cases where the pitcher steps off the mound and fakes a throw or theold fake-to-third-fake-to-first. There's almost nothing in baseball I hate more than watching the pitcher throw over 7 or 8 times when a good base stealer is at first.

It would increase the success rate of basestealing such that more teams would try it.
_Simon - Wednesday, August 25 2004 @ 06:36 PM EDT (#39756) #
I really don't like that idea. It ties the pitchers hands too much. For example if he throws over twice, he almost has to go to the plate because the runner knows that if he throws over again, then on the following pitch he'll be free to take as large a lead as he likes. It would hurt the pitcher and the defence. And that's the last thing the game needs.

The reason that basestealing is down has to do with how the players have changed, not the rules. Rickey Henderson stole all those bases without that extra head start that rule would provide.
The Hesitation Pitch | 17 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.