Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
I haven't had a chance to see David Bush pitch in a big league game yet. During his major league debut, I was in Buffalo watching a AAA game, and I was out of the country when he made his last start.

Bush faces one of the most promising young Canadian pitchers to emerge since Ferguson Jenkins. I speak, of course, of Rich Harden.
Game 93: The Young Mr. Bush | 320 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
_Moffatt - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 02:56 PM EDT (#50238) #
I sure hope Bush can get his first big league dubya this afternoon.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:14 PM EDT (#50239) #
Thank goodness there's a game I can watch live for once. Mind you most of the games I didn't see live were so grim that it was a pleasure to watch bits of them at fast-forward speed.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:37 PM EDT (#50240) #
Oh boy those pictures of the different pitching grips are awesome, I wish the fox sportsnet channels would do those. I've been trying to google for those sorts of pictures, with little success, for ages.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:44 PM EDT (#50241) #
I seem to be the only person here but I'm quite happy talking to myself.

I like the lineup. An outfield of Johnson, Wells, Rios looks strong. Infield of Hinske, Gomez, Hudson, Delgado also looks okay. Cash gets a start behind the plate. I hope we don't see too much more of Zaun -- much as I like the sound of his character there is an inevitability about his regression to career hitting performance.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:47 PM EDT (#50242) #
Anyone else having problems with the TV reception?
_Keith Talent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:48 PM EDT (#50243) #
I want more Woodward. And DHing Zaun isn't the same as giving him a day off.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:48 PM EDT (#50244) #
Is the game on TV at all?

I'm at work listening to the radio.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:51 PM EDT (#50245) #
Oops I hadn't spotted that Zaun is DH-ing. I cannot understand the organisation's treatment of Phelps (and I daresay Cat will DH a fair bit when he comes back so Phelps' playing time will be limited further). With Cash at least we know that a better prospect is coming soon (Quiroz).
_Four Seamer - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:51 PM EDT (#50246) #
They're not exactly making it tough on the Canuck, are they? Two innings, fifteen pitches!
_Keith Talent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:51 PM EDT (#50247) #
And Phelps is on the bench again! While Zaun DHes.
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:53 PM EDT (#50248) #
The Jays must want to get home pretty badly. Sixteen pitches to get through 2 innings. Not really a good philosophy against a starter whose primary problem has been wildness and going deep into games.
_Keith Talent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:54 PM EDT (#50249) #
Were I managing this what I would trot out:

Johnson, LF
Rios, RF
Wells, CF
Delgado, DH
Phelps, 1B
Hinske, 3B
Woodward, SS
Cash, C
Hudson, 2B
_Four Seamer - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:56 PM EDT (#50250) #
Given that Harden really brings the heat from the right side, I guess they feel Phelps can't handle that kind of pace. His breakout games against Seattle came against a couple of soft tossers, after all.

The regression of Phelps is a real mystery to me, but there's not much point in denying that the Jays are convinced he's not going to amount to much.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:57 PM EDT (#50251) #
Are you playing Phelps at 1B in preparation for Delgado leaving and Phelps taking over there? Delgado seems to be a perfectly good first baseman and Phelps isn't (yet) so it's a bit of a risk.

Re Woodward vs Gomez, I have no strong feelings. I have never thought that Woodward was up to the task of becoming our everyday SS and Gomez plays solidly.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:59 PM EDT (#50252) #
Never mind! The Tv has returned, like Lazarus, from the dead.
_Keith Talent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:02 PM EDT (#50253) #
I'm resting Delgado, day game after night - and he's not far removed from the DL. Phelps will be rusty at first but THAT'S NOT MY BLOOD FAULT!! Woodward's swinging a hot bat and needs to get some live time at SS. Granted: Woodward throwing to Phelps could be a little scary. But I'm making a statement. Is it Woodward's defence that everyone has trouble with?
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:04 PM EDT (#50254) #
I really could care less for Woodward.

The sooner he is out of the picture at SS for the Jays, the better.
_P Smith - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:05 PM EDT (#50255) #
Candiotti can definitely pick out those hit-and-runs.

Well-timed HBP with two strikes on Cash.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:07 PM EDT (#50256) #
Crikey, looks like Hudson would have been caught easily had they not stuffed up the throw.

Keith, my feeling about Woodward is that it's the whole package. Offence in important situations, defense, all just a bit below par somehow. He just looks like he's going to fail, and all these comments from Tosca about him never fulfulling his potential (is he trying???) worry me a great deal. But like I said, I don't feel strongly about Gomez vs Woodward at SS right now.
Craig B - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:07 PM EDT (#50257) #
Just tuned in... who's sitting with Jerry today?
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:12 PM EDT (#50258) #
The regression of Phelps is a real mystery to me, but there's not much point in denying that the Jays are convinced he's not going to amount to much.

It might look like that from the outside, but I don't think that's the organization's feeling about him.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:13 PM EDT (#50259) #
Craig, I just missed his name...he's a broadcaster with someone's minor league system...I missed whose.

I'm not very helpful.
_Four Seamer - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:16 PM EDT (#50260) #
It might look like that from the outside, but I don't think that's the organization's feeling about him.

I hope you're right, but if they are still high on him, their treatment of him is awful perplexing.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:19 PM EDT (#50261) #
It might look like that from the outside, but I don't think that's the organization's feeling about him.

Okay, the situation as we see it is consistent with either a) they think he's useless and can't even be bothered to try to showcase him for a trade or b) they think they can fix him up with more time with the coaches and less in play, this year. b) does make sense because this season is a mess anyway.

I wish I believed that it would work; it seems a big ask to fix the technique of a 26 year old with a big loopy swing. If it does work we might have a good team next year or 2006. If it doesn't, we have a big hole in the team for quite a while, or we overpay for a FA.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:21 PM EDT (#50262) #
Say it with me... GOING, GOING, ZAUN!
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:24 PM EDT (#50263) #
Going where? Florida?
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:26 PM EDT (#50264) #
Nobody said it with me, so it didn't work.

But if Zauny goes to Florida we'll have to teach some Floridians the chant.
_Brian B. - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:29 PM EDT (#50265) #
I don't remember his name but the guy in the booth with Jerry Howarth is the radio announcer for the A's AAA Sacramento club.
_Four Seamer - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:32 PM EDT (#50266) #
I'm developing a substantial liking for this kid David Bush.
Craig B - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:32 PM EDT (#50267) #
I think Jerry's partner is excellent.

Check out the linescore, but NOBODY SAY ANYTHING.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:33 PM EDT (#50268) #
That's our Bush!
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:33 PM EDT (#50269) #
Donnie something -- I'm liking him too.
_Keith Talent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:39 PM EDT (#50270) #
Kevin Cash kinda looks like a young Dracula.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:40 PM EDT (#50271) #
YEEEHAW!
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:41 PM EDT (#50272) #
AND strikes him out!
Mike Green - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:41 PM EDT (#50273) #
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=240720107
Karim Garcia arrives in Baltimore, and promptly hits 2 homers and drives in 5. COMN. Exhibit A to the law of small sample sizes-"youneverknow".
Craig B - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:41 PM EDT (#50274) #
Sweet. What a call by the manager.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:42 PM EDT (#50275) #
Thought Gomez got rid of the ball a little quick on the run down, but Carlos and Dog finished it off nicely.

And another super play by Hinske! Who is this guy?
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:42 PM EDT (#50276) #
This is the all-defense Jays.

Ken Macha's fighting with the ump? Is the unicorn with him?
_P Smith - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:42 PM EDT (#50277) #
They got the runner, but I think they need to practice those run-downs more often.

Scutaro is evil. Hooray for Hinske.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:42 PM EDT (#50278) #
Good defensive inning by the Jays!
Craig B - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:42 PM EDT (#50279) #
Bush : NOBODY SAY ANYTHING.

What a sweet, sweet, sweet inning.
_Chris B. - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:43 PM EDT (#50280) #
"If you're attempting to steal from the Cash register, you're gonna get caught." The young Jim Sundberg comparisons were right on target.
Craig B - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:45 PM EDT (#50281) #
Heh. MLB Gameday got so confused by that inning that it froze in the middle and only just came back.
_Mike in CT - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:48 PM EDT (#50282) #
Can the Jays offense PLEASE support the kid!?!?! Come on already. How about some runs?
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:48 PM EDT (#50283) #
The announcers just mentioned that the Jays have agreed to terms with LHP Zach Jackson from Texas A & M.

GREAT NEWS!!
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:49 PM EDT (#50284) #
I have a good feeling about Delgado here.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:51 PM EDT (#50285) #
Awww, crap.
_Four Seamer - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:52 PM EDT (#50286) #
Was that pitch as far out of the zone as it appears on Gameday?
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:52 PM EDT (#50287) #
Wow, Delgado nearly picked up dirt with the end of his bat on that one.

So I guess it's official. 15 poor at-bats followed by a homer or two.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:52 PM EDT (#50288) #
With all this defense it sounds like a fun game to be watching.

Hey, do the A's always have lousy attendance, or is it just when the Jays are in town?
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:52 PM EDT (#50289) #
Well at least you made me laugh, Hank.
_Brent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:54 PM EDT (#50290) #
I wonder what kind of pitch count Bush will be on today? If he can keep his control problems down, he'll be sitting pretty.
Craig B - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:54 PM EDT (#50291) #
Can the Jays offense PLEASE support the kid!?!?! Come on already. How about some runs?

So I guess it's official. 15 poor at-bats followed by a homer or two.

Whine whine whine. We get it already.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:55 PM EDT (#50292) #
Well at least you made me laugh, Hank.

We does what we can.
_Brent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:57 PM EDT (#50293) #
Wow. Nice at bat from Kotsay.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:57 PM EDT (#50294) #
YEAH, siddown Kotsay!
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:57 PM EDT (#50295) #
That was great - 12 pitches, 10 strikes. But let's hope there's something still in the tank.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:58 PM EDT (#50296) #
It was good, but Bush won it. ;)
_Ryan Day - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 04:59 PM EDT (#50297) #
Dammit. Why can't I be at home watching this?
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:00 PM EDT (#50298) #
Geez, we better come up with a really nice K for Bush before he pitches at home next.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:00 PM EDT (#50299) #
STRUCK OUT THE SIDE!
_Mike in CT - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:00 PM EDT (#50300) #
Whine whine whine. We get it already.

Just trying to rally the troops so a brilliant outing isn't wasted. What's with this attitude?
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:00 PM EDT (#50301) #
David's bringing the heat a bit in this game! He hit 92 mph to Chavez just now.
_Brent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:00 PM EDT (#50302) #
Yes!
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:01 PM EDT (#50303) #
And wow, Bush K's the side!!

Is this kid great or what?
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:02 PM EDT (#50304) #
And even after the Kotsay AB, and K'ing the side, he's thrown 6 fewer pitches than Harden.

Man, these two guys could be an awful lot of fun to watch for the next ten years or so...

...if they don't get hurt....
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:02 PM EDT (#50305) #
It was a great inning but it does have pitchcount implications. I would have thought that 100-105 pitches would have been the maximum heading into the start today.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:02 PM EDT (#50306) #
Geez, we better come up with a really nice K for Bush before he pitches at home next.

How about a burning bush?
_P Smith - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:03 PM EDT (#50307) #
Will this start put to rest the idea that Cash doesn't handle the pitchers well?
_Brent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:03 PM EDT (#50308) #
Well it's official. I'm leaving work to go catch the rest of the game. I'll be at, ugh, Spirits on Church and Bloor if anyone needs me.

And by "needs me", I mean "misses my hilarious and thought provoking posts". ;)
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:03 PM EDT (#50309) #
Can you say pitchers duel?! This has to be one of the best games we've been involved in all year from a pitching stand point.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:03 PM EDT (#50310) #
I'm sure they'll David pitch count up to 120 as long as he's doing fine. He's been starting without a problem all year.
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:06 PM EDT (#50311) #
Unfortunately it looks like the Jays could bat all day and not score.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:06 PM EDT (#50312) #
We're halfway through the sixth? Holy crap, this game is flying past.

I wish I could be watching this one.
_Ryan Day - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:07 PM EDT (#50313) #
Geez, we better come up with a really nice K for Bush before he pitches at home next.

I vote for a picture of Dick Cheney.
_Brian B. - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:07 PM EDT (#50314) #
A burning bush sounds good!
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:09 PM EDT (#50315) #
Bush Almost Seems To Be Getting Stronger As The Game Goes On.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:09 PM EDT (#50316) #
Harden breezes through another inning. I'm wondering if the hitters have a really poor hitting backdrop in day games at this park.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:10 PM EDT (#50317) #
Four straight. Wow.

Maybe he just needs a beautiful golden K.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:11 PM EDT (#50318) #
David Bush is offically the Blue Jays new Golden Boy. Break out the gold K's for Skydome!
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:11 PM EDT (#50319) #
Bush Almost Seems To Be Getting Stronger As The Game Goes On.

That's my favourite song!
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:12 PM EDT (#50320) #
DOG!! DOG!! DOG!!
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:12 PM EDT (#50321) #
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!
_Bob Irving - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:12 PM EDT (#50322) #
I'm a transplanted Canadian and Jays fan down here in PA. Watching the game on MLB Gameday and missing seeing my boys on TV! Who is this Bush guy? Way better than the one down here (Dubya). Go Jays!
_James W - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:12 PM EDT (#50323) #
By the sounds of the radio, Hudson just made an outstanding play to end the bottom of the 7th.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:13 PM EDT (#50324) #
Hudson saves the day with a diving stab of a Durazo liner! Still scoreless through 7 innings.
_BCMike - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:13 PM EDT (#50325) #
Listening to the game on the net, kinda not paying too much attention to it until I realized how late in the game it is... :)

How bout we get a run or two.

Way to be O-Dog! or as Faulds would say GOOD DOG!!
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:13 PM EDT (#50326) #
It was a full length dive at a line drive that was already past him into RF for a base hit. Tremendous play.
_jason - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:13 PM EDT (#50327) #
Go aught dog!
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:13 PM EDT (#50328) #
That was (yet another) outstanding play by Hudson. With Bret Boone's bat softening up, could he win the Gold Glove this year?
Mike D - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:13 PM EDT (#50329) #
Hey, everybody, what'd I miss --

NOBODY SAY ANYTHING

Oh, right-ho. Just sitting here at work. (whistles)
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:13 PM EDT (#50330) #
I really like this guy paired with Jerry today. How come no major league team has scooped him up? How about that call on O-Dog's catch? Outstanding.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:15 PM EDT (#50331) #
95 pitches for both starters through 7 innings. Only one hit the entire game. Talk about evenly matched.
_Paul D - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:15 PM EDT (#50332) #
This is awesome!
I don't have speakers at work, so I'm left with ESPN's gamecast, but this is still fun.
_Bob I - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:16 PM EDT (#50333) #
Can we just get some runs for this kid? We need something to cheer about in this season... We got the top of the order coming up.
_BCMike - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:16 PM EDT (#50334) #
NOBODY SAY ANYTHING

Too bad Howarth had to spoil it... he should know better.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:17 PM EDT (#50335) #
Who is this Bush guy?

He's a callup. Looked really good in two outings that should have been wins for him so far.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:17 PM EDT (#50336) #
Think Billy Beane will let us borrow this Harden guy for Athens?
_Tim - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:17 PM EDT (#50337) #
What an incredible catch by Hudson. Wow! Bush owes him a big thanks.

What a pitching duel.

Why can't we get a run to help out Bush? This is three games in a row that the offence hasn't supported him.
_Bob I - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:18 PM EDT (#50338) #
That was fast...
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:19 PM EDT (#50339) #
Harden is pitching a gem of his own with 8 strikeouts through 8 innings and just 107 pitches to this point. He could easily go another inning. Maybe even two. Bush has been great but he'll have to keep bringing it.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:19 PM EDT (#50340) #
And down goes Hudson, Cash and Johnson with relative ease. Lets give some props to Rich Harden, he's matched Bush pitch for pitch. What a game.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:20 PM EDT (#50341) #
I will definitely be watching the highlights tonight. This game sounds astounding.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:21 PM EDT (#50343) #
Faulds just said that Harden is only 22! How do the As get so many good young pitchers?
_Bob I - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:22 PM EDT (#50344) #
Damn! Who was talking?
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:22 PM EDT (#50345) #
Damn. 7 1/3 without a hit. I'm going to stand up and applaud right now in my office.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:22 PM EDT (#50346) #
:(
_BCMike - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:22 PM EDT (#50347) #
Dammit.
_Keith Talent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:22 PM EDT (#50348) #
I'm leaving work, bolting to a pub.
_Tim - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:23 PM EDT (#50349) #
Why does it always end right after somebody says it? Cerutti mentions the no-hitter and instantly Miller breaks it up. Great shame.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:23 PM EDT (#50350) #
Awww, crap...

Off the top of my head, one of the best pitching duels I can remember the Jays being part of.

Anyone remember Appier-Hentgen, 1994 I think. It was Pat's 14 K game.
_Gwyn - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:23 PM EDT (#50351) #
If I hadn't left Bush on the bench in Alomar this would never have happenned :)
_Keith Talent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:23 PM EDT (#50352) #
...never mind.

I'll still go watch the end of this one though.
Mike Green - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:23 PM EDT (#50353) #
Now let's get the W.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:23 PM EDT (#50354) #
Jerry mentioned it at the end of the last inning, too. And my wife mentioned it in the fifth. And Craig's hints were heavy handed, while I'm at it. ;)
_Rich - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:24 PM EDT (#50355) #
Who would you rather have - Harden or Bush?
_Keith Talent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:24 PM EDT (#50356) #
We should know from Dave Stieb, that no hits through 7 is a LONG, LONG way from a no-hitter.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:25 PM EDT (#50357) #
If we lose this game because we can't hit after Bush's effort...
_P Smith - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:26 PM EDT (#50358) #
The ump's had a tight strike zone, making both performances even more remarkable.

If you know any Cubs fans, keep an eye on them to make sure they don't jump off a ledge or something. 8-2 lead over the Cardinals up in smoke.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:29 PM EDT (#50359) #
If I'm right, O-Dog is the only base runner to get as far as 2nd base today (he made it to 3rd).
_Mark J - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:29 PM EDT (#50360) #
Yeah, check out Pujols' line today, 5 for 5, 3 HR, 1 2b, 4 runs, 5 rbi...

Alright, just ... one... run!
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:29 PM EDT (#50361) #
Holy Cow, look at Pujols line for the day!!

5/5
4 runs
5 rbi
3 HR
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:30 PM EDT (#50362) #
98 MPH in the 9th inning?

Sick.
_Ryan Day - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:30 PM EDT (#50363) #
Okay, let's get one of those "run" things I've been hearing about now...
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:30 PM EDT (#50364) #
Yay Hinske!

Who would you rather have - Harden or Bush?

Am I the only one with a dirty enough mind to snicker at this question?
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:31 PM EDT (#50365) #
Eric! Yes, c'mon Vernon.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:31 PM EDT (#50366) #
Through 8 innings:

Bush 107 pitches, 71 strikes, 1 hit, 3 BB, 6 K
Harden 107 pitches, 65 strikes, 1 hit, 2 BB, 8 K

I think we'll see one more inning from both pitchers unless the Jays score in the top of the 9th.

Hinske starts it off right with a single up the middle.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:32 PM EDT (#50367) #


Kind of like to have both, dontcha think?

Dirty, dirty...
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:32 PM EDT (#50368) #
Mark J - JINX!!!

Another thing...

YAY DOTEL IS WARMING!!

Dotel is the master of the "oops, I think I just left my heater right over the middle of the plate!!"
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:33 PM EDT (#50369) #
Who would you rather have - Harden or Bush?

Kind of like to have both, dontcha think?

Dirty, dirty...
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:35 PM EDT (#50370) #
There, I finally got the italics right. You can tell I don't write a lot of HTML.
_Four Seamer - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:35 PM EDT (#50371) #
Who would you rather have - Harden or Bush?

One's no good without the other, I'd think.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:35 PM EDT (#50372) #
Delgado pops up alot... Ever notice that?
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:37 PM EDT (#50373) #
Now would be an excellent time for "Going, going, Zaun!!"
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:38 PM EDT (#50374) #
Great great game by Harden. And Macha is absolutely right to come and get him now.
_Snappy - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:38 PM EDT (#50375) #
Now would be an excellent time for Rios' 1st HR.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:38 PM EDT (#50376) #
Now would be the perfect time for Rios' first dinger.
Pistol - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:39 PM EDT (#50377) #
If I'm running the team I pull Bush after 8. He goes 8 innings giving up only 4 baserunners and no runs - that's gotta be a pretty good confidence booster.

The best that'll happen if he's left in is that he'll get a no-decision (assuming the Jays don't score). But if you leave him in he could lose the game making the previous great innings an afterthought.

Plus he's at 107 pitches. No need for any more tired shoulders.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:39 PM EDT (#50378) #
GOING, GOING, ZAUN!!

GOING, GOING, ZAUN!!

GOING, GOING, ZAUN!!

GOING, GOING, ZAUN!!

Okay, if Alex does good here it will greatly increase the chances of our first child being named Alex.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:39 PM EDT (#50379) #
Alex Rios up facing Octavio Dotel in an absolutly HUGE spot.

Here's hoping that 'Lexi can just get a little base hit here.
_greenfrog - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:40 PM EDT (#50380) #
Or a bases-clearing triple.

Very happy about (i) Bush's amazing outing (just tuned in); (ii) no damage found in Halladay's shoulder.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:41 PM EDT (#50381) #
AGONY!!!!!!
_Four Seamer - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:42 PM EDT (#50382) #
I wouldn't mind if Alex were to provide one of his patented four-run triples right about now...
_Four Seamer - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:42 PM EDT (#50383) #
Or a Delgado-esque pop up to foul territory, for that matter.
_Snappy - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:42 PM EDT (#50384) #
Nuts.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:43 PM EDT (#50385) #
Man, that last inning was so exciting that I took my radio with me when I went to the bathroom.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:44 PM EDT (#50386) #
Any complaints today about JP's draft choices?
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:44 PM EDT (#50387) #
Uh oh, it's McLemore pinch-hitting for Byrnes.

In Chulk we trust.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:44 PM EDT (#50388) #
Nooooo! Bring back The Golden Boy! Chulk is gonna blow this... :'(
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:44 PM EDT (#50389) #
I absolutely agree with Tosca's decision here to pull Bush. 107 pitches is enough for now.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:45 PM EDT (#50390) #
It seems to have gotten lost in the commotion, but Zach Jackson was signed today.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:46 PM EDT (#50391) #
I totally disagree with his selection of pitchers though. Speier Or Frasor should've been called in.
_erik - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:46 PM EDT (#50392) #
i agree with pulling bush... but i just dont trust chulk, he's been in a bad funk of late.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:46 PM EDT (#50393) #
Yep, keep 'em off of second.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:47 PM EDT (#50394) #
Ok we got the obligatory McLemore hit out of the way. Falling behind to Chavez he can't give in. Get him to chase at the knees. He grounds to short but the Jays can't turn the double play on the slow chopper.
_BCMike - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:47 PM EDT (#50395) #
i agree with pulling bush... but i just dont trust chulk, he's been in a bad funk of late.

My feelings exactly.
_Chris B. - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:47 PM EDT (#50396) #
Can Frasor go more than 1 today?
Mike Green - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:47 PM EDT (#50397) #
Pistol, I agree. There is no way he'd be pulled if he had a no-no. As it was, I imagine from all I've read of Bush that he'd be unhappy not to go out there for the ninth.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:48 PM EDT (#50398) #
I like both moves by Tosca.
1) Taking out Bush
2) Bringing in Chulk

I have no faith in guys like Speier or Adams, and you still want to keep Frasor available.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:48 PM EDT (#50399) #
Oh man!!!

ALEX is a living god!!!
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:48 PM EDT (#50400) #
Yeah, RIOS!

OK, there's still a chance that we'll name the kid Alex.
_BCMike - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:48 PM EDT (#50401) #
Can Frasor go more than 1 today?

He could but he pitched last night, and it wasnt a very quick inning. I don't think I would send him out for 2.

Way to go Rios!
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:48 PM EDT (#50402) #
Chulk hits 96 against Dye. Rios makes a diving catch on a hard liner! I'd say he's getting the hang of the outfield.
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:50 PM EDT (#50403) #
I understand the sentiment about Chulk but one of the criticism's of Tosca (by me as well) is that he has had a revolving door of roles in the pen. Yes, Chulk has struggled his last 2 or 3 outings but I vote for seeing a more stable pen and keeping Chulk as the key high leverage non-closer pitcher. It may backfire but I think its defensible.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:50 PM EDT (#50404) #
Damn straight. The Vincredible one proves me wrong. Its good to be wrong sometimes.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:51 PM EDT (#50405) #
Vinny gets out of it. You can't give up on the kid just because he struggles a few games.
_erik - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:51 PM EDT (#50406) #
hey, chulk did it. to extra innings we go...

it's a shame we couldn't get bush a win, he certainly deserved it. (of course, harden did too.) Appaulse for both.
Pistol - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:52 PM EDT (#50407) #
Didn't the Jays and A's have a low scoring, extra inning game (scoreless?) last year?
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:52 PM EDT (#50408) #
EXTRA INNINGS, BABY!
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:54 PM EDT (#50409) #
Cubs cough up an 8-2 lead and lose 11-8 to the Cardinals. Isringhausen gets Aramis Ramirez with the bases loaded to end the game.

98 years... do I hear 99??
Mike Green - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:55 PM EDT (#50410) #
Twice in three starts, Bush's opposing pitcher has thrown up nothing but zeroes. Each time, Bush has matched 'im, and left the game unscored upon.

Off to extras, but Bush vs. Harden is a story.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:56 PM EDT (#50411) #
Hey Kevin, how 'bout some pop?!
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:57 PM EDT (#50412) #
.....Or not.....
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:57 PM EDT (#50413) #
It's okay, they're setting up Alex Rios to get the game winning run so that I'll name the kid after him. That's fine by me.
_JackFoley - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:57 PM EDT (#50414) #
Interesting to bring in Frasor now. I suppose Tosca feels he is more apt to go 2 innings than Chulk.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:58 PM EDT (#50415) #
I've all but given up on Kevin Cash as a hitter. His defense is incredible though and he's got a rocket arm so I guess he sticks as the backup catcher.
_greenfrog - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:58 PM EDT (#50416) #
From Baseball America's weekly prospect hotlist, in the 'Special Mention' category:

"Glenn Williams, 3b, Triple-A Syracuse (Blue Jays)

Eleven years ago, Williams was one of the biggest stories in the Baseball America universe, a 16-year-old Australian shortstop with tools galore who received a $800,000 signing bonus. After six disappointing seasons with the Braves in which he recorded more strikeouts than hits, Williams has become an organizational player in the Blue Jays system (the team that initially battled Atlanta to sign him in '93), spending his last three years at Syracuse while nearing his 1,000th minor league game played without ever reaching the majors. Enjoying the best season of his career (.265-21-65), the now 27-year-old utilityman is expected to be a primary run producer on the Australian Olympic squad."
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 05:59 PM EDT (#50417) #
Interesting to bring in Frasor now. I suppose Tosca feels he is more apt to go 2 innings than Chulk.

That's an odd decision, consider the fact that Frasor pitched just last night and has a history of arm troubles that have caused him to get extra rest this season.

Chulk on the other hand is an ex-starting pitcher and is more than able to go 2 innings.

What makes the decision even more interesting is the fact that Frasor must face Durazo, who homered to right off him last night.
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:01 PM EDT (#50418) #
Well, I'm headed home...good thing the radio is portable.

Cheer for me!
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:02 PM EDT (#50419) #
Albert Pujols day at the office:

1st inning - RBI double, Cards up 1-0

3rd inning - solo HR, Cards down 7-2

6th inning - leadoff 2B, starts the 4 run rally that cuts the Cubs
lead to 8-6

7th inning - solo HR, Cards down 8-7

9th inning - two run HR, Cards take 10-8 lead.
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:02 PM EDT (#50420) #
Sometimes numbers do tell the whole story. That's absolutely true with Kevin Cash. He just isn't ready offensively for the major leagues. He had zero chance against Dotel. I know Dotel's tough but you could just see from watching the AB that he had no chance. I remember a game against Baltimore last year in which I commented that we were witnessing the two worst hitters then in the majors (non-pitcher category) in Cash and Cust. Cust has gone back to AAA and really, offensively, that's where Cash belongs. I'm not sure his arm is enough reason to keep him around.
_Jonny German - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:03 PM EDT (#50421) #
Yay Aaron!!
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:05 PM EDT (#50422) #
Not to discount the performances of Bush and Harden because they were both awesome but the other thing that's apparent today is that we're watching two pretty bad offensive teams.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:05 PM EDT (#50423) #
Great inning by Frasor.

It looks like this inning could be one of the Jays best chances to get on the board. They've got the top of the lineup coming up and they could possibly push the inning to Delgado which would be huge.

Dotel still in there though, doing his best Mariano Rivera impersonation... minus the save situation.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:06 PM EDT (#50424) #
I think that may be it for Frasor for today.. But the real bad news here is who's left in the bullpen.... Terry Adams, Justin Speier and Kerry Ligtenberg.. Please, not today..
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:07 PM EDT (#50425) #
Adams warming up. Oh god.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:08 PM EDT (#50426) #
I don't think Oakland is a BAD offensive team. They're middle of the pack. They're 9th in the league in scoring, and they play half their games in one of the two best pitcher's parks in the AL. Middle of the pack.

Now Seattle, Kansas City... there's some BAD offense...
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:11 PM EDT (#50427) #
Are our bats that bad or is Oakland's pitching that good?
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:12 PM EDT (#50428) #
I'd say a little bit of both Mike.

Incredible, I think Vernon Wells has taken get this, 5 PITCHES, in this entire series!!

That's 10 plate appearances and only 5 pitches taken. What happened to the plate discipline?
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:12 PM EDT (#50429) #
I'm so upset that I missed the first six innings of this game. Why wasn't I told it was an early start?

Heh.

Oh well, at least I'll watch the finish. Adams will do OK, it's not a save situation.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:14 PM EDT (#50430) #
Hey.. I heard somewhere that Phelps was used as a pitcher in High School.. Just saying this so you won't be shocked in the 20th inning.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:14 PM EDT (#50431) #
I fear Mark Kotsay!!
_Cristian - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:16 PM EDT (#50432) #
Terry Adams has to be brought in to some games. How else will JP trick some GM into trading for him?
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:17 PM EDT (#50433) #
Could someone tell Vernon that he doesn't have to swing every time they throw him a strike?

One called strike in last night's game. He swung at everything else.

One called strike today. He swung at everything else except the five pitches outside the strike zone, four of them for his walk in the sixth. Five fouls, three swing-and-a-miss, three outs on balls in play.

Meanwhile, there have been five hits in this ball game, and a guy who didn't get off the bench until the 9th inning has two of them.
_Chris - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:20 PM EDT (#50434) #
That's the way Vernon has always approached his at-bats and it shouldn't change. Not everyone has to take pitches to be successful.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:21 PM EDT (#50435) #
Especially in his last at-bat against Harden, it was late in the game and your trying to get the guy who's dominated all day out of the game. Making him throw 1 or 2 pitches isn't really going to work him that much.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:21 PM EDT (#50436) #
True - I don't expect him to start walking 85 times a year. But would you throw him a strike? And if so, why?
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:21 PM EDT (#50437) #
It's clear what we need.

Bring in the heroics of Dave Berg.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:23 PM EDT (#50438) #
"Bring in the heroics of Dave Berg."

Never thought I'd read those words on a Blue Jays board!
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:23 PM EDT (#50439) #
Ryan, Berg did have the single greatest AB for a Blue Jay this season.

Bottom of the 9th against Guardado and the Mariners and I believe he took the AB to 14 pitches before he drove a line drive over the left field wall.

Berg is the man!
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:24 PM EDT (#50440) #
I don't understand this. Is Lehr coming in because he's the only guy who didn't get into last night's game?

Way to go Alex!!
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:25 PM EDT (#50441) #
Here's what I'd do right now.. got some dude no ones ever heard of with a ERA in the 6's... Put Berg in to run at 1st and pull off a little hit and run action.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:25 PM EDT (#50442) #
It's official...

NAME THE KID ALEX!!!
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:25 PM EDT (#50443) #
A Cat sighting!
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:25 PM EDT (#50444) #
CAT !!

Bet they walk him.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:25 PM EDT (#50445) #
CAT SIGHTING!
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:26 PM EDT (#50446) #
DAWG SIGHTING... I guess :
_Dez - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:26 PM EDT (#50447) #
For a second I thought Cash was coming up next..
_Dez - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:26 PM EDT (#50448) #
For a second I thought Cash was coming up next..
_jason - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:27 PM EDT (#50449) #
C'mon aught Dog!
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:27 PM EDT (#50450) #
Walk the cat, get bit by the Dog?
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:27 PM EDT (#50451) #
So they'll walk Cat to get to Hudson, whom we daren't pinch hit for...
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:27 PM EDT (#50452) #
So they'll walk Cat to get to Hudson, whom we daren't pinch hit for...
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:27 PM EDT (#50453) #
What would truly stink is if Hudson gets an out and the big inning lays on the shoulders of Cash.

COME ON O-DOG!!!
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:27 PM EDT (#50454) #
And then they pinch run for Cat. What a ballgame for him!
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:29 PM EDT (#50455) #
Okay...forget the cat and dog, here comes the mouse!
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:29 PM EDT (#50456) #
Zaun taking no chances...
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:30 PM EDT (#50457) #
I do love the way Zaun plays the physical game...
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:30 PM EDT (#50458) #
Wait, if Cash is Pinch hit for, and Zaun moves to catch, does the pitcher have to bat?
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:30 PM EDT (#50459) #
Nooooo.... Why us?!
_BCMike - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:31 PM EDT (#50460) #
Wait, if Cash is Pinch hit for, and Zaun moves to catch, does the pitcher have to bat?

Yup.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:31 PM EDT (#50461) #
Or will Berg catch..... Or Phelps?!
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:32 PM EDT (#50462) #
The pitcher bats 9th, of course!!

It just worked out that way. Berg and Phelps still around to pinch hit when (if) the spot comes around.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:32 PM EDT (#50463) #
Aaaargh!
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:33 PM EDT (#50464) #
Blue Jays leave the base juiced, doo dah, doo dah.

Sigh, at least the top of the order will be up next inning.

(There will be a next inning.)
_Ron - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:34 PM EDT (#50465) #
Never ever seen a game before where the pitcher will be due up to bat in a AL game.

Of course we still have two guys to pinch hit though.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:35 PM EDT (#50466) #
This team's hitting in "clutch" situations is going to drive me to the brink of insanity.

That was just the best chance EITHER TEAM has had ALL GAME.

Bases Loaded, 1 out...

And as usual no one scores.

_BCMike - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:36 PM EDT (#50467) #
I cant remember a game where the Jays moved their DH into the field. Anyone else?
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:36 PM EDT (#50468) #
Its one of those weird things. RH batters hitting .386 against Adams, LHG batters hitting .205
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:37 PM EDT (#50469) #
The Jays have the infield back which makes it too easy for Hatteberg to drop one down in that spot.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:38 PM EDT (#50470) #
This does not look good, 1st and 2nd with nobody out. Hinske should surely have been playing further in?
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:40 PM EDT (#50471) #
Huge double play there for Adams.

And in comes Ligtenberg...
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:41 PM EDT (#50472) #
Double Play, but the runner moves to third.

Ligtenberg comes out to face Crosby. If there was ever a time for him to strand a runner...
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:41 PM EDT (#50473) #
This has an excellent chance of not working, but Tosca's right. Adams has been far tougher on LH batters; Ligtenberg is much tougher on RH hitters.

Its the right move.

Doesn't mean it's gonna work, of course...
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:43 PM EDT (#50474) #
Anyone else feel that Kerry is coming around?
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:43 PM EDT (#50475) #
You know that Kerry's going to win in California, of course? Not Bush.
_Ron - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:43 PM EDT (#50476) #
Wooo ... dodged a bullet there

Hopefully the Jays starter tommorow goes deep vs. the Yanks because the bullpen will have little gas left in the tank.
_My Names not Ry - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:44 PM EDT (#50477) #
nah super berg can pitch 5
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:45 PM EDT (#50478) #
That's Hentgen tomorrow? Gulp.

Anyway, a Hum-Dinger of a ball game. Remember Bush and Harden?
_miVulgar - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:45 PM EDT (#50479) #
Kerry comes through...

In a season full of painful losses, a win here would go a long way towards easing some of the hurt...

On to 13...
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:45 PM EDT (#50480) #
Anyone want to speculate on why the Jays can't score runners from 3rd with less than two outs? I just can't figure that one out.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:50 PM EDT (#50481) #
Another prompt 2 pitch at-bat from Wells that results in another out.

It's on to the bottom of the 13th with Miller, Scutaro and Kotsay due up.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:51 PM EDT (#50482) #
Darn, the leadoff hitter gets on.

Scutaro definitely will be bunting here, so bring the infield in.
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:52 PM EDT (#50483) #
Crap, leadoff guy gets on and now we're gonna have to see the ever-dangerous Mark McLemore.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:53 PM EDT (#50484) #
Hey Ryan, don't forget about Kotsay. He's a pretty dangerous hitter and he's pretty good at putting the ball into play.
_Daryn - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:53 PM EDT (#50485) #
Anyone want to speculate on why the Jays can't score runners from 3rd with less than two outs? I just can't figure that one out.

I agree, they/we seem to have no problems hitting long fly balls at other times...

Are there stats for team-GIDP?
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:53 PM EDT (#50486) #
Of course, the intentional walk.

And so it is the Jays killer McLemore who is due up.
_My Names not Ry - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:53 PM EDT (#50487) #
A sac bunt as the key play between two GM's like Beane and Riccairdi?
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:54 PM EDT (#50488) #
It's been a great ballgame defensively and the pitching has been awesome. But three hits all game and very little patience at the plate makes this another pretty pathetic offensive effort by the Jays.
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:56 PM EDT (#50489) #
Ligtenberg to face two lefties ... I can't watch ...
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:56 PM EDT (#50490) #
Don't worry Ryan, he got McLemore and he'll get Chavez.

Trust me
_P Smith - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:58 PM EDT (#50491) #
An emphatic third strike call from the third base ump.

Travis Hafner hit three homers for the Tribe, six RBI. There sure is a lot of offense elsewhere around the league.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:58 PM EDT (#50492) #
Kerry gets my vote...
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:59 PM EDT (#50493) #
Don't worry Ryan, he got McLemore and he'll get Chavez.

Right you are!

I should have more faith in this bullpen.

Who'd have thought we'd have a bullpen battle with these two clubs?
_Ron - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 06:59 PM EDT (#50494) #
When was the last time the Jays played a game into the 14th inning?
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:01 PM EDT (#50495) #
I'm picking Rios to get the game-winning hit.
_My Names not Ry - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:04 PM EDT (#50496) #
Internet service 20 bucks
Baseball 8 bucks
Beer 6 bucks at some parks
hot dog 3 bucks
clutch fly out by a 210 hitting player 18.5 million
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:06 PM EDT (#50497) #
3 hits in 14 innings...

Absolutly horrendous
_Moffatt - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:07 PM EDT (#50498) #
If both teams scored a crapload of runs, somebody would be whining that steroids are killing baseball.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:07 PM EDT (#50499) #
Who's that warming up in the bullpen?! Zach Jackson?!... If this keeps up, maybe.
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:09 PM EDT (#50500) #
Rios made the last out, so Tosca makes a double switch. Speier pitching and hitting 6th, Berg in LF and hitting 9th.
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:09 PM EDT (#50501) #
Is Berg in because of a double switch?
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:10 PM EDT (#50502) #
And it immediately comes back to haunt the Jays.

"Berg tentative on a fly to left"
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:10 PM EDT (#50503) #
Answered already thanks! We don't have many options left on the bench. Nor reliable options in the bullpen. Now or never?
_Magpie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:11 PM EDT (#50504) #
Bobby Crosby's 0-4 today, but I can sure see why Oakland didn't lose any sleep about letting Tejada walk.
_Mike Forbes - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:15 PM EDT (#50505) #
...And its all but over........ *Sigh*
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:15 PM EDT (#50506) #
Absolutly horrible spot to walk somebody right there although Speier may have gotten the squeeze.

Now the A's have the Bases loaded with 1 out and their 8 and 9 hitter's coming up.

Let's see how they do...
_Nigel - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:16 PM EDT (#50507) #
The season of heartbreaking losses continues.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:16 PM EDT (#50508) #
I hate Justin Speier
_BCMike - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:16 PM EDT (#50509) #
Grrrr
_miVulgar - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:16 PM EDT (#50510) #
Another swift kick to the nuts.
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:16 PM EDT (#50511) #
Why did Speier keep throwing the ball to the outside part of the plate when it was obvious he wasn't getting the call? ARGH.
_Brian B. - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:17 PM EDT (#50512) #
Oh well, I enjoyed the game anyway!
_Andrew K - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:17 PM EDT (#50513) #
Oh dear.

You can't help but think that the Jays deserved to lose after leaving the bases loaded in the 11th or 12th or whenever it was. But it's very tough on Bush who has pitched very well for us and has yet to get a "win".
_Moffatt - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:18 PM EDT (#50514) #
Me too, Brian. A great pitched game between two teams. It's a shame the bad guys won, but as a fan of pitching, I absolutely loved it.
_Ryan Lind - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:18 PM EDT (#50515) #
Yeah, it was definitely an enjoyable game.

Unfortunately, you just knew that with the A's getting the leadoff man aboard every inning that they were due to score eventually.
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:18 PM EDT (#50516) #
Just look at the top of the 12th for the reason why the Jays lost.

Bases Loaded 1 out and the Jays AGAIN fail to get atleast 1 runner in. Absolutly horrible.

That's the reason why the Jays lost and continue to lose tight games. Not because the pitchers gave up 1 RUN in 14 INNINGS.
_Ron - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:20 PM EDT (#50517) #
Ever since Wells and Delgado came back the Jays have managed to score 12 runs in 50 innings.

That my folks is brutal.

Bush's start is wasted and the bullpen is empty tommorow vs. the Yanks
_BCMike - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:21 PM EDT (#50518) #
So should Berg have caught that ball in left(in other words would Johnson have caught it?)
_DaveInNYC - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:23 PM EDT (#50519) #
WITH Pat Hentgen on the mound might I add. It sure figures to get ugly. What makes things worse is that I have tickets... in the bleachers... to tomorrow's game so that figures to be a fun time :(

What makes things worse is the fact that Damian Miller had as many hits (3) and more RBI's (1, lol) than the entire Jays offense.

Sigh, oh well, another day at the office for the Jays...
_the shadow - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:25 PM EDT (#50520) #
A star pitcher (Doc) goes on the DL and behold another star is born (Bush)
_Ron - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:27 PM EDT (#50521) #
Anybody have an idea of who the projected 5 picks are going to be for next years draft?
Thomas - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:33 PM EDT (#50522) #
Well, a great game in any case. A brilliant start by Bush; he was masterful. A lack of hitting by the heart of our lineup overshadowed a solid effort from our bullpen. Too bad in the end we just couldn't pull it out. But it was a great game to watch. One of the best I've see all year. Hats off to both Harden and Bush.
_jason - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:48 PM EDT (#50523) #
A fun but disapointing game. Some random thoughts.
- I love that Cash calls for the high strike. More importantly it works. Not high at the waist, but high out of the strike zone. For a team that tries to keep it on the ground one or two of these a game can be effective.
- For a guy who is reported to be on an even keel - no cussing etc. - Vernon Wells seems to be more and more iritable.
- Watched the third inning with my nephew who is three years old. He already knows the basics; "who's your favorite team Ben? Blue Chays". Still it was fun to learn him some of the finer points, like which ones are the Chays. And he likes when the pitcher throws it by someone; "whoa!".
- Man this offence is woeful. I looked up and down the stats this morning in the Sun, and there are some incouraging signs. But put into effect, the numbers just don't add up.
- Regarding Bush, I'm sold. He can be on my ticket any day.
_Emerald - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 07:59 PM EDT (#50524) #
With Hentgen tomorrow I'm expecting two things. Either Hentgen will be amazing and stop the Bronx juggernaut with ease, or he'll get lit up and leave in the 2nd inning. If it's the latter, then we can look forward to 5 innings from File, and then the disasterous but hilarious pitching debut of one David Berg. Terrific game.
_Mick - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 08:12 PM EDT (#50525) #
Well, in a kind world, Bush may one day remind many of you of a young man who, after starting his career 1-0 as a "rookie," ended up winning 67 games over his next three seasons.

I am speaking of course about the immortal Larry Cheney, of the post-Tinker-Evers-Chance Cubbie magic.
_Smack - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 08:19 PM EDT (#50526) #
And with the 2005 #6 draft pick the Toronto Blue Jays select.....
_Brent - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 08:29 PM EDT (#50527) #
Even though the Jays lost, you must admit that today's game was one of the highlights of 2004.

Anyone?
_Smack - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 08:37 PM EDT (#50528) #
Great game, and I am sure everyone was impressed with Bush, whether this was a pitchers park or defense was great or not.

JP said he was a good potential 4-5 starter, but I thought he was so highly regarded as a starter because of his smarts. He gets ahead and then although he doesnt really have an out pitch, he knows how to maximize his pitch to strike out the guy. That is why I think he isnt in the same range as a Towers. If his peak is a 4 or 5th starter, I would rather move him back to be a harder throwing closer.
_Moffatt - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 09:04 PM EDT (#50529) #
RE: Bush

Since being converted into a starter, he's put up the following numbers:

A: 14GS, 7-3, 2.81ERA, 77IP, 6HR, 9BB, 75K
AA: 14GS, 7-3, 2.78ERA, 81IP, 4HR, 19BB, 73K
AAA: 16GS, 6-6, 4.06ERA, 99.2IP, 7HR, 20BB, 88K
MLB: 3GS, 0-1, 2.29ERA, 19.2IP, 0HR, 5BB, 12K

I think he'll make a fine starter for the Jays for years to come.
_greenfrog - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 09:15 PM EDT (#50530) #
Wonderful to see Bush spinning magic on the mound. Along with Rios' performance of late, it provides a bit of hope for the future.

Is anyone familiar with 'tired shoulder' syndrome? If there is no structural damage or tears in Halladay's shoulder, can we expect him to recover fully? Or is this the pitching equivalent of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome--the source of continual physical woes, even if there is a lack of scientific evidence to back it up?
Named For Hank - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 09:18 PM EDT (#50531) #
We went to a bar and saw the end of the game. Wow. Just wow.

What a game.
_Jacko - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 09:33 PM EDT (#50532) #

Bobby Crosby's 0-4 today, but I can sure see why Oakland didn't lose any sleep about letting Tejada walk

Man, that guy has some kind of arm. He could probably have made it as a pitcher if he wanted to...
_Ron - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 10:12 PM EDT (#50533) #
http://www.twinsgeek.com/ is reporting through a "source" JP is trying to trade for Morneau
_Nolan - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 10:30 PM EDT (#50534) #
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/gammons/story?id=1842904
Just a Gammons article and he had a few things to say about Delgado and Batista:

Carlos Delgado's refusal to waive his no-trade, even to join a pennant race with his friend Shawn Green, was taken as a serious blow to the Jays, who thought they could get a couple of future parts for the first baseman. There are few better persons in the game than Delgado, but the perception around the game is that he doesn't care about going into the postseason with a team like the Dodgers. When Rafael Palmeiro and Juan Gonzalez did so last year, they were referred to as being selfish. No one can accuse Delgado of being selfish. However, he can be accused of taking bad advice, for performing in a pennant race and in the postseason could get him back closer to eight figures in his 2005 contract. The Jays have indicated that they will entertain offers for Miguel Batista, but they have to get two good prospects to even think about trading him.

COMN (although I just posted the important part...)
_Nolan - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 10:31 PM EDT (#50535) #
*read*
_sweat - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 11:03 PM EDT (#50536) #
Too bad about the loss, I missed the end as I had to leave for my soccer game(another dissapointing loss, although I did run over a guy pretty good). Nice to see Bush pitch well, even when under pressure, ie knowing the hitters aren't gonna do much.
_Ron - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 11:18 PM EDT (#50537) #
A team would have to be crazy to give up 2 good prospects for a 33yr old pitcher with an ERA of 4.02 and 58 Walks to only 77 K's. But at the same time unless the 2 prospects were major league ready by next season such a trade would make you think the Jays were already quiting for next season too.
_R Billie - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 11:29 PM EDT (#50538) #
33 is not old for a pitcher and a 4.02 era for under $5 million is a pretty good deal. From the Jays perspective they'd definately take that for another two years and if someone isn't going to make it worth their while then why would they trade Batista in the first year of his contract?
_Ron - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 11:35 PM EDT (#50539) #
I disagree about saying 33 isn't old. I don't have the numbers in front of me but I believe once you hit your early 30's your performance usually starts to fade.

Batista has been solid this season but I don't see any team giving up 2 good prospects for him. Of course "good prospect" is very subjective.
robertdudek - Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 11:55 PM EDT (#50540) #
When it comes to pitching, after 24 or 25, age becomes almost completely irrelevant.

What counts is stuff and mileage on the arm. Batista hasn't racked up a lot of innings, hits mid-90s on the gun at times and has a very impressive repertoire of pitches.

The key for him will be whether he can hit his spots with consistency, and that's something that generally improves (or at least doesn't decline) with age.
Craig B - Wednesday, July 21 2004 @ 12:14 AM EDT (#50541) #
A great, great game. If that's deadball era baseball (few hits, lotsa bunts, defense defense defense) then I want Gitz to get back to building us that time machine.

WOW. I'm still buzzing from the game, hours later.

I'm not going to re-engage the boobirds in here. I'm just a cranky old man.

Is anyone familiar with 'tired shoulder' syndrome? If there is no structural damage or tears in Halladay's shoulder, can we expect him to recover fully? Or is this the pitching equivalent of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome--the source of continual physical woes, even if there is a lack of scientific evidence to back it up?

I'm not an expert, but I'll take a shot.

Presumably, there is swelling - and possibly routine damage at the microscopic level - even though there's no structural damage. Microtears happen all the time - they're a big part of why you and I hurt after a long day's exertion. They would be nothing to be concerned about.

Anyone without structural damage but who is experiencing pain or weakness will usually be prescribed a period of rest, and very often that's all that's needed to put things right. At the very small level, the body usually heals itself much better than a surgeon ever could.

We can expect Halladay to recover fully - it's not a sure thing, but it's easily the most likely outcome, and considerably more likely (in my experience - but this is anecdotal) than all other outcomes combined.
_Andrew K - Wednesday, July 21 2004 @ 03:20 AM EDT (#50542) #
I enjoyed the game too although I found it a bit tense. And I went straight to bed after it (was past midnight here) and didn't sleep very well because I was so wound up!

A bleary-eyed good morning from the UK.
Coach - Wednesday, July 21 2004 @ 04:27 PM EDT (#50543) #
If that's deadball era baseball

Yeah, Craig, it was a marvelous baseball game; shades of Gibson vs. Marichal. Fantastic pitching, superb defence, constant drama -- unforgettable, win or lose. There's not enough of those in a season, and too many of the 16-6 variety.

I'm not going to re-engage the boobirds in here.

Some people never look beyond the scoreboard or the standings. Others seem to take pleasure only in whining or complaining at every opportunity. What a shame they can't fully appreciate a masterpiece.
_rodent - Wednesday, July 21 2004 @ 04:38 PM EDT (#50544) #
For those wishing to prolong the good feelings, there is a wonderful picture of Bush delivering a kinghell slider in today's National Post.
_Mick - Wednesday, July 21 2004 @ 05:07 PM EDT (#50545) #
What a shame they can't fully appreciate a masterpiece.

Hear, hear. (Or is that "here, here"?) Anyway, if (for instance) I'm watching a 0-0 game between the Yankees and Indians and Mussina has a three-hit shutout and Cliff Lee is tossing a perfecto ... I'm rooting for Lee unless and Yankee loss knocks them out of the playoffs or something.
Named For Hank - Wednesday, July 21 2004 @ 05:49 PM EDT (#50546) #
From the Jays perspective they'd definately take that for another two years and if someone isn't going to make it worth their while then why would they trade Batista in the first year of his contract?

The answer is that they wouldn't. There is no way they're trying to trade him -- Gammons is misinformed.

See the trade pool. ;)
_Nigel - Wednesday, July 21 2004 @ 06:08 PM EDT (#50547) #
Wow, I don't know where the concerns about the negativity on the site arose from but it does seem that anytime anybody says anything negative about a game or the Jays it gets the above negative response about not appreciating the game, or Jays management, etc. I've been posting here since the early days and there seems a definite shift in the tone of things around here. The beauty of the site has always been (and in large measure continues to be) the quality of the writing, the quality of thought of the posters and the civil (non-moronic tone) of the debates. It also seemed ok to challenge certain decisions or plays of mangement. If you look at the game thread, absent a couple of negative comments, there wasn't a lot of negativity. There was some debate about managerial moves, etc. My negative comments were focused on what I thought was a poor job (particularly early in the game) of showing patience and working counts on a pitcher that has difficulties in that regard. If that's not appreciating the game or understanding what a masterpiece it was then I guess I've missed the point critical analysis that is some much a part of this site. For what it's worth I thought it was the best game of the year. That doesn't mean that the game and some of the decisions can't be criticized.
_Ryan Lind - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 02:19 AM EDT (#50548) #
Couldn't agree more, Nigel.

I've read every post in this thread, and I hardly sensed any negativity. JP Ricciardi said on the radio today that he questioned one of Tosca's decisions, so if questioning some managerial moves in a baseball game qualifies as being a whiner who doesn't appreciate the game, then I suppose JP should find a new sport.

I really do not understand why some of the posters on this site feel the need to get on their high horse and chastise anyone who says anything about the Jays that isn't rosy, and label them as "whiners" or "bandwagoners" just because they have a differing opinion.

It was a great game, I think we can all agree on that. But even if someone didn't enjoy the game, I don't think they should just be dismissed as being "boo-birds" or people who can't appreciate a good game. In fact, I find that fairly arrogant. Just my opinion.
Named For Hank - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 07:23 AM EDT (#50549) #
I've read every post in this thread, and I hardly sensed any negativity.

Come on...

another pretty pathetic offensive effort by the Jays.

Internet service 20 bucks
Baseball 8 bucks
Beer 6 bucks at some parks
hot dog 3 bucks
clutch fly out by a 210 hitting player 18.5 million

3 hits in 14 innings...
Absolutly horrendous

Absolutly horrible.

That my folks is brutal.


I would not have called that came horrible or brutal or pathetic. I saw a brilliant pitcher's duel and, surprise, not a lot of people getting on base during it.
Named For Hank - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 07:27 AM EDT (#50550) #
I missed the one where Nigel says it's apparent we're watching two teams with pathetic offense.
_Nigel - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 10:59 AM EDT (#50551) #
Named For Hank - you're right - I did say that the Jays and A's are pretty poor offensive teams. If pointing out that the 9th and 12th best offenses in the AL are pretty poor makes me negative then guilty as charged.
Named For Hank - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 11:31 AM EDT (#50552) #
Nigel, you didn't use "pretty poor", you used "pathetic". There's a world of difference. I think this is where the objections arise, when such superlatives are used.
_Nigel - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 11:44 AM EDT (#50553) #
If you'd like to reread post #185 in which I made the comment - we're both wrong - I used the words "pretty bad". My mistake on saying I used "pretty poor" :) I stand by the comment 100%, this year the offenses in Toronto and Oakland have been pretty bad.
Named For Hank - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 11:49 AM EDT (#50554) #
My apologies, you called the Jays offense pathetic a couple of posts before that one. I got the two tangled up.
_Ryan Lind - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 06:10 PM EDT (#50555) #
NFH: First of all, that's 5 comments.

Five negative comments in 300+ posts pretty much proved my point. Not a lot of negativity in this thread, so I don't know where the complaining (about the complaining) comes from.

Second of all, what is wrong with those comments? They're all true, aren't they?

Is 3 hits in 14 innings horrendous? I think so. Does that mean I'm "whining?" I don't really think so. It's an observation. And an accurate one, I might add.

I guess I can sort of see your point, that it's a pitcher's duel so we shouldn't expect much offense from the Jays, but what's wrong with the Delgado comment?

I don't really see how saying "Delgado makes 18 million and is hitting .210" qualifies as "whining," or even being negative. It's the truth, and it's troubling. I would say that Blue Jays fans have every right to be upset with his production this year.

Quite frankly, I just don't see what your problem is. Is this the site for compliments only? Should every post just be "Go Jays go" and that's it? I don't get it. If someone is upset that their team can't score runs, then what's wrong with that?
Named For Hank - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 06:40 PM EDT (#50556) #
Upset, fine. But don't tell me that the game I just had a lot of fun listening to was pathetic or brutal. Using charged words and just trying to rub salt into the wounds helps no one.

This thread, isolated and on its own, is nowhere near as bad as many of the ones we've seen lately. My favourite is the one where the poster tells Craig he's not a true fan because he's not freaking out that the Jays are losing games while rebuilding.

When we're nailed with this over and over and over again we get touchy about it. It's frustrating. I don't like the losses either! I think they suck too! But there are so many positive things to be taken from what's happening that to focus on the negatives (or to crap in my Rob Faulds thread, that was really classless) is maddening.

So no, this was not the most negative thread, at least partially because people made efforts to herd it away from that.

There is no problem with someone expressing their opinion of a game or a play or a player, but to harp on the things that we all know without adding anything... it feels like people are delighting in the Jays' ill fortune and saying "see, I told you they stunk".
_Ryan Lind - Thursday, July 22 2004 @ 07:03 PM EDT (#50557) #
Well that's understandable, I guess.

Maybe we should have a seperate thread where we can all just vent and not "rub salt in the wounds." ;)
Game 93: The Young Mr. Bush | 320 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.