Ah, at last a game that's on at a reasonable time of day for me. I hope it does get started soon!
The last three losses were *ugly*. Tosca looks like he's about the put his head into the guillotine. The only thing that made them any better was watching the archived game at 140% speed, which is quite entertaining. Hentgen sure had some velocity!
I really hope for two wins today, with Doc to set it up.
All the Jays in the dugout look a little miseerable, but the tarp is off the field and we're off - first pitch from Buehrle to Ree is high and away - ball!
One - out triple from Woody. Hitting him second is obviously a brilliant TC move. Nice opposite-field curling shot to right-center. Woody simply took third from them ...
Delgado grounds out weakly to second, into the shift. Wasted a one-out "triple".
Is anyone else a little nervous about HRH pitching in that weather in Chicago? I'd hate to see him tighten up, or have his back seize up on him. At least he won't start the nightcap.
Oh, crap, for a second I thought I was prescient with Halladay tumbling after that first-pitch pop-up off Harris' bat - O-Dog snagged it and Doc seems ok.
I'd rather Doc not attempt too many pickoffs, or at least not seriously - his step to 1st looks jerky and bad news in the cold. Let Cash shoot off some snap throws instead.
I'd rather Doc not attempt too many pickoffs, or at least not seriously - his step to 1st looks jerky and bad news in the cold. Let Cash shoot off some snap throws instead.
The Uribe single - it was clean - little chopper up the line, thick grass, it died - Hinske had absolutely no chance and took a bite out of the ball. It was the right play.
1-0 Jays - RBI double, Cash chugged home (he looked like he was in pain rounding third) - Berg is up with 2 out - he gets a hit here, I call easy win for the Jays in this game.
According to my calculations, the O-dog is now hitting .261 from the right side, which is pretty much the same as his average from the left side. Good stuff.
Halladay looks unconscious out there - the ball is just darting all over the place and his motion looks so comfortable and smooth he could probably pitch 12 innings, if it weren't for the cold. Got Thomas to look like a weenie grounding to third. Big Hurt - hmph!
Ooh, what a look Roy gave the plate ump on that ball four count against him. Then he throws a NASTY pitch to start off Crede. Gotta love the Jays not having to bat against Halladay.
Enjoy the double dip, everyone - I'm off to drink some fine draught beers (Beer Bistro - you got to go!) and watch Blues great James Cotton rip out some harp licks at Healey's.
_Paul D - Saturday, May 01 2004 @ 05:20 PM EDT
(#68519) #
Hypothetical question: Doc has a once in a lifetime, 60 pitch 1 hit shutout. Do you even think about bringing him out for the first 4 or 5 innings of game 2?
No, just because 1) The batters have already seen him at least 3-times a piece 2) If he were injured or whatever, the media would kill you 3) Time between the 1st game ending and 2nd one starting would hurt him
Has anyone ever proposed a Candiotti/Cerutti tandem (with Cerutti relegated to play-by-play, and Candy doing the colour)?
Cerutti did some play-by-play with Cheek and Howarth before he joined the CBC telecast in 1997. He was very difficult to listen to since his delivery tends to be quite choppy. That's a significant drawback for someone who has to describe action as it's taking place. Faulds is a significantly better play-by-play man than Cerutti was.
Thursday was the first time that mlb.tv has carried the RSN feed so it was my first experience of the egregious Faulds I hear you talking about.
He was certainly pretty irritating. "Hentgen looking for his first win as a Blue Jay" - hardly! But what annoyed me most was his voice/accent. I suppose you're going to beat me up now because it's a Canadian accent or something but honestly I can't tell what kind of accent it what. I just know that Faulds and the guys who do the Devil Rays broadcasts, have voices that really grate on my ears.
Phelps just watched as strike 3 went by with 2 men on base to end the inning - on what looked like a hittable pitch on the outside corner of the plate. Maybe he needs some time in Syracuse to get his hitting stroke down because he is of no value to the Jays with at bats like that one. Just terrible!
I enjoyed watching a great pitcher pitch to Mags and Thomas, two great hitters. It really was a contest worth watching. And the good guy came out on top.
Thomas - Saturday, May 01 2004 @ 06:29 PM EDT
(#68543) #
Well, I think we'll get Marte for Delgado, problably the whole 8th while he's at it and Koch will come in for the 9th. Marte's gonna be tough to hit, even with the heart of our lineup up. I hope Guillen doesn't get smart and leave Marte in to neutralise Hinske and force Hudson to bat right-handed (regardless of how well he's being doing recently, it's still his worst side).
I guess we're setting the bar at striking out. Anything other than that is a good at-bat.
Counting on Woodward, Hudson and Cash to carry the offense (along with Delgado, of course) is just asking too much. This lack of productivity in the 3 and 5 holes is just deadly.
I can't imagine this lineup without Delgado. I think sometimes as Jays' fans we take him for granted in terms of his salary and long tenure of consistency.
Didn't Tosca mention that Adams would have the traditional closer's duties for now, implying Adams would be reserved for the one-inning saves? (I might have been extrapolating a little).
What a waste of a start by Doc. Just one mistake cost him a W. Damn, V is struggling. That early K with 1 out & Woodward on 3rd was...well, representative of the Jays woes thus far. They're hitting considerably better, but just not well enough to win.
The bottom of the fifth killed Doc's chances of going all the way. +40 pitches that inning. He was all over the place too. Very fortunate not to get hurt worse.
The only saving grace about VW is how bad Delgado looked two weeks ago. However, Delgado only struggled for two weeks and has a much better track record.
What do you think would be a better turning point for the Jays season? They win 2 15 inning games today energizing the entire roster and the fanbase or they lose two fifteen inning games and hit rock bottom a la Halladay in A Ball?
Of course, it'd be much more practical to win one in 11 and a laugher in 9 but....
BTW, DGriebling take *that* for saying there was no chance to set a thread record. We, of course, don't know if it will happen but it certainly seems possible now. ;-)
I've always wondered which hitters -- on every Jays roster -- would be the 12/13 pitchers. On the current roster, it's probably either Berg or Zaun (maybe Clark).
Marte did his best to walk Kevin Cash by not throwing a single pitch which would have been called a strike but Kevin would have none of it.
And I think we should starting getting used to that. Just as we were quick to entirely dismiss Cash as a major leaguer last season, I think we are too quick this year to believe that he's suddenly a legit starting catcher.
NDG, there's still a WHOLE lot of that when I play MVP2004... I seem to manage to swing while the catcher is already throwing the ball back to the pitcher
Anyone else find this umps strikezone very narrow but low (top of ankles seem to be a strike, but anything more than a couple inches away from center is a ball)?
Now THOSE were good at bats by Ordonez and Thomas. I have no idea why insisted on throwing slider after slider to Thomas outside. He'll have a very good look at those pitches and has great judgement.
And for some reason known only to Justin Speier and Kevin Cash they throw a high fastball to Crede when he took two weak hacks at sliders low and away. Ball up is where Crede likes it...ball up is easier to hit to the outfield. Instead of staying with the pitch that gave them success they went with the pitch that was inviting failure.
Sometimes the pitch selections the Jays make are simply HORRID. Forget out not having a proper scouting report, how about just knowing that you have to keep the fricking ball DOWN if you want to avoid a sac fly or get a double play to get out of the inning? Cash needs an IQ check.
It sounds odd to say this, but I'm not sure that we can hang this one on Tosca.
A critical, and on-going, lack of timely hitting. Some dubious pitch selections by Speier.
R Billie, you seemed to nail the scouting report thing on the head. Some of the Jays' pitchers seem to know less about their opponents than we do, and that's not a good thing!
It would have been much easier to take if Crede had an incredible at bat like Ordonez and Thomas did and the Jays were forced to mix things up and go with a very risky pitch. But it was an 0-2 count. Completely in the driver's seat and able to pick ANY pitch they wanted to throw in that situation they somehow came up with the worst possible one. Maybe the coaches have to start thinking about calling pitches from the bench, at least in key situations.
With all these bad breaks piling up against the jays again and again in the start of the season, its hard to keep thinking of them as bad breaks and not just what the team is.
Thomas - Saturday, May 01 2004 @ 07:53 PM EDT
(#68626) #
I guess they decided to avoid the Jeff Reardon plan of attack, but it still strikes me as quite a poor outcome to have that one up in the zone after Crede managed marginal contact on the first two. Cash should have selected something else there, but he also could have done a better job at blocking the plate, or maybe even diving back to tag Ordonez, although I'm really not sure that would have made a difference.
It was a tough to lose given the Delgado shot in the 8th and the way Adams escaped the jam in the 9th. I wonder if Reed would have thrown out Mags if he was in RF.
It just seems like the Jays are finding ways to lose: leaving runners on (eg third base with <2 out), poor execution, questionable bullpen management and pitch selection, timely strikeouts (by our guys), too many walks to opposing batters.
There is no way a team with this much talent should have an 8-16 record. Oddly, though, I don't think it's Tosca's fault--for the most part, anyway.
On a positive note, if the Jays are out of the race this summer, they will have a few useful players to deal to the contenders for prospects: Johnson, Myers, Catalanotto, maybe a couple of the starters and/or bullpen guys, possibly Delgado. I still think 2005 and 2006 looks bright, especially with McGowan, Bush, Banks, Rios, Quiroz, and others on the way.
I remember a soccer game back in the UK when Manchester United changed uniforms mid game. They were wearing a grey shirt for the first time, and were down by something like 3-0 at half time to lowly Southampton. Alex Ferguson ordered them to change to different shirts and decreed they'd never wear the grey ones again. I don't remember if they went on to win the game.
I don't think the Jays can afford to lose anymore fans.
While we have good prospects the chances of all of them being good is slim. And most rookies will need a year or two of seasoning in the majors. If you look at it that way perhaps the Jays could contend in 2 or 3 yrs.
Whats with the Bauxite exodus? The jays are finally looking good and no one's around to see it. Although to be fair if i wasn't battling a nasty cold right now, i probably wouldnt be at home either. Carry on.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=stark_jayson&id=1793156 On the espn website jason stark has some bad news for jays fans and backs it up by some startling stats.
Thomas - Saturday, May 01 2004 @ 09:31 PM EDT
(#68655) #
Cat singles home Chris "Speedy Gonzalez" Woodward after a hit-and-run with Clark kept the Jays out of the DP, forcing the White Sox to get the sure out at first.
Well the team cant ride my coat tails to success everygame! Sometimes they gotta pick up their socks and say just like President Palm- er... Pedro Cerano "F*@k you Jobu! I'll do it myself!" and win their own games! GO JAYS GO!
Lilly's thrown 79 pitches through 4 innings. One more inning, two tops, for Ted. He threw 125 pitches last start, so I'd err on the side of caution this time, particularly as he is not at his best.
Thomas - Saturday, May 01 2004 @ 10:17 PM EDT
(#68667) #
In the bottom of the 6th Nakamura goes 3 and oh on Olivo but then comes back to strike him out. In the top of the 7th Cat ties a career high with 5 hits.
Tonight is a night when Faulds and Candiotti sound like a pair of Vin Scullys compared with by far the worst "broadcasting" tandem in baseball: Ken Harrelson and Darrin Jackson. Between their horrendous White Sox homerun calls and Harrelson's "he gone" (which fittingly sounds more like "hee haw"), whenever an opposing hitter strikes out, they're an embarrassment to the game and should not even be allowed to call little league games. Since I'm focusing on bad broadcasting, here are my favourite 5 TV brodcast teams:
1)It's a no brainer: LA Dodgers: play-by-play: Vin Scully, colour: Vin Scully. The game is one endless sentence from beginning to end, complete with detailed anecdotes, perfect for your last game of the night. 2)SF Giants: Kruk and Kuip, truly funny and inciteful. "Grab some pine meat" has to be the best oft repeated saying in the game. 3)Boston Red Sox: I can't remember the play-by-play guy's name, but Jerry Remy is priceless on colour, complete with thick Massachusettes accent and wry sense of humour. 4)Minnesota Twins: Bert Blyleven does a great job with the colour, but again I've forgotten the play-by-play guy's name (perhaps that's a sign of a good play-by-play guy- FAULDS!!!) 5)Anaheim Angels: Rex "the Wonder Dog" Hudler is outrageous on colour Honourable Mentions: Florida Marlins, St. Louis Cardinals, when Joe Buck is working at play-by-play, with Al "the Mad Hungarian" Hrabosky on colour. I've also got to give it up for our radio team. I'll call them "the big three". Tom and Jerry get excited when the opposition does something well (Ahem!! Mr's. Harrelson and Jackson). Mike Wilner might be the best host going, with his incredible preparation and solid grasp of sabermetrics. Yeeeesssir! How about that broadcast team!!
An interesting stat so far this year which would further highlight the difficulty the Jays are having at the plate: they are 2nd last (to the Expos) in OBP in innings 1-6 at .304, but are 5th in the majors in innings 7+ with a .367 percentage.
Also a bit of a follow up, before today's games the Jays lead the league in batting average with the bases loaded, hitting .471. However, with men in scoring position, which obviously occurs at a far more frequent rate, they're 3rd last, hitting only .221.
It's extremely close, but I'd have to say Hawk and DJ at the wire, by a nose. The Leafs crew embarass Leaf fans with an IQ (I know there are so few of us!), with their constant carping at and berating of officials, although I must say McGeough must have dropped somethin' good before that game with Ottawa because he saw things that just weren't there against both sides. But, I digress...
The Hawk is only legendary in his own mind and his legendary status is far outweighed by his monstrous ego!! Why is Adams pitching. I hope his arm holds together.
Hey, the Hawk was GM of the Soix for, um, one year I think.
Most improved has to go to the Cubs Chip Caray. In 2001, he was intolerable (and he had Joe Carter as his side). Now, with Steve Stone, he's much more professional. And if you compare the Sox radio/TV cres, and the Cubs radio/TV crews, Caray/Stone (Cubs TV) far outdistance the other 3
_Jobu - Sunday, May 02 2004 @ 12:13 AM EDT
(#68690) #
Maybe the formerly blue birds just need to some kind of zany team thing to bond together. Remember when they all went blonde? Just need to think of something original.
_Jobu - Sunday, May 02 2004 @ 12:34 AM EDT
(#68693) #
WAY off topic, but did anyone else see that sketch just now on SNL when everyone lost it? Sure it was funny as hell and laughter like that much more contagious then anything else they could write... but what happened to professionalism?
I read some of those slump ideas, but i ment more stuff that the team could reasonably do to bond together, rather than any zany stuff we as fans could do.
I know eh. There's just no more professionalism in late night sketch comedy! Another black mark on the eye of the industry. Most of the SNL skits seem to be more odd than funny these days.
_Rob - Sunday, May 02 2004 @ 12:57 AM EDT
(#68696) #
SNL seems to be more anything than funny. An excellent argument for either staying out late Saturday nights or going to bed early. Obviously, I have done neither of these tonight. :)
_Jobu - Sunday, May 02 2004 @ 01:01 AM EDT
(#68697) #
well, since we're on the topic now, i dont feel so guilty about keeping it going but did anybody actually see that sketch tonight im talking about? I've never seen an SNL sketch before where everybody just lost it in that degree. I mean at one point i thought they were just going to give up and walk out. Not surprisingly it was the funniest moment of the show far and away.
SNL screw-ups can be hilarious, as long as they're not happening all the time. There's a great one I remember watching with Candace Bergen & Gilda Radner: About halfway through, Bergen mixes up her character's name with Radner's; Radner corrects her, and they both spend the next two minutes desperately trying not to burst into laughter.
(Didn't see the one in question, though. No cable.)
_Jobu - Sunday, May 02 2004 @ 01:20 AM EDT
(#68699) #
That one i also recall seeing (not live, but in highlights) but even then they seemed more professional about it than the one tonight. I cant believe all these night owls and im the only one who saw this thing.. ha.
I haven't watched Saturday Night Live in years (not because I don't want to; just because I don't stay up that late anymore). So I didn't see that sketch. I do remember another couple where the performers lost it, though:
- the one where the family brings in Matt Foley, the Motivational Speaker (Chris Farley) to straighten out their teenagers (David Spade, Christina Applegate). Spade and Applegate were obviously trying to restrain their laughter all the way through it.
- the very first appearance of Tarzan (Kevin Nealon), Tonto (Jon Lovitz) and Frankenstein (Phil Hartman) on a panel discussion. I forget who the moderator was. The topics were things like 'bread' ("Bread good." "Yes, bread good."). But when they got to 'fire', Frankenstein freaked out and started yelling 'Fire bad!' . . . but Phil Hartman couldn't keep a straight face so he got up and lumbered around knocking over the set and stuff, and lurched offscreen. The other three, left with the sketch in shambles all around them, just sat there collecting themselves for a second, until Tarzan leaned over and said, "Line between fantasy and reality very blurry for Frankenstein."
_Jacko - Sunday, May 02 2004 @ 10:51 AM EDT
(#68701) #
I haven't watched Saturday Night Live in years (not because I don't want to; just because I don't stay up that late anymore). So I didn't see that sketch. I do remember another couple where the performers lost it, though:
The Welshey Arms Hotel (Luvas!) skit with Will Farrell and Drew Barrymore wasn't all that amusing until everyone started cracking up. Then it became hysterically funny.
The Welshey Arms Hotel (Luvas!) skit with Will Farrell and Drew Barrymore wasn't all that amusing until everyone started cracking up. Then it became hysterically funny.
If you get a chance, watch the Old Prospector Skit on "The Best of Will Farrel". Hilarious skit! Fallon, Sanz and the other guys cannot stop laughing at Farrel. I guess that's why it never made it past dress rehearsal. I have friends that have to leave the room when that skit is on for fear of being killed by uncontrollable laughter.
Damn, i wish SOMEBODY saw last nights sketch just so i could talk about it now. I even called up my friends who usually watch and they also werent watching for some reason.
As for some good news, the Blue Jays aren't last in the AL East anymore!!!!