Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Recently, mlb.com began offering a waycool new feature: for $3.95 (US), you can download a complete baseball game and watch it on your own computer. Most of the games are recent, but there's a few blasts from the past on there, including the now-legendary Game 6 of the 1975 World Series. Recently, I watched the entire game, and took a few notes.

- It didn't take me long to notice that, contrary to popular belief, the strike zone wasn't much different in 1975. Admittedly, it was a small sample size, but umpire Satch Davidson wasn't calling strikes above the belt. If there is a difference between the 1975 zone and the 2000 (pre-edict) zone, it must be in the width - the Glavine Clause wasn't in effect back then.

- One thing that struck me about the crowd watching the game was the almost complete absence of replica caps, jerseys, shirts, warmup jackets, etc. A modern-day baseball fan often comes to the park wearing something in team colours or bearing the team logo - Cardinal games, in particular, are always played in front of a bright red backdrop. I think I might have been able to spot a few caps in the 1975 crowd, but not many.

- When a new pitcher came into the game, four cameras were trained on him and displayed all at once, giving the viewer an opportunity to view his pitching motion from all angles. I don't know why or when split screens went out of fashion, but I thought this was kind of cool.

- In modern-day broadcasts, the pitch is always shot from the centre-field camera, so you can get to watch the expression on the hitter's face as he swings. In 1975, this wasn't standard. Sometimes, the pitcher's delivery was viewed from centre field, sometimes from behind home plate, and sometimes, disconcertingly, from the third base dugout. While I think the centre field shot is the best, I kind of liked the view from behind home plate. It's interesting to see what a pitch looks like from the batter's point of view. (My usual reaction was, "Thank God I don't have to face that.")

- Watching Luis Tiant pitch was worth the $3.95 all by itself. He sometimes throws sidearm, and sometimes overhand. Sometimes, he twists his back in mid-delivery. Occasionally, he pauses before releasing the ball. The Boston fans, who had been given the privilege of watching Luis for many years, were so into his delivery that they would applaud him in mid-motion, like figure-skating fans who have just witnessed an impressive triple lutz. (Roger Angell's article on the 1975 World Series attempts to name some of Tiant's pitching motions, including the Fall Off The Fence, the Low-Flying Plane, and the Call The Osteopath.) I hope that MLB eventually offers one of his earlier starts in that series, when he was at his best - in Game 6, Tiant was roughed up in the later innings.

- The biggest difference between modern baseball and 1975 baseball is the physiques of the athletes. Modern athletes spend a lot of time in the weight room building up baseball-related muscles; as a consequence, they are broader-shouldered and more "ripped" than ordinary mortals. In 1975, hardly anybody ever went near a training room, which meant that athletes were more ordinary-looking (though clearly healthier and stronger than us mere mortals). I now think that specialized weight training has led to baseball's offensive explosion in the 1990's.

- George Foster's at-bats took forever. Foster liked to step out of the box to throw off the pitcher's timing; he would walk a few paces off, and then saunter back into the box. (My guess is that he never tried this against Bob Gibson.) In the 10th inning, he and Dick Drago got into a waiting contest. First, Foster stepped out. Then, when he got back in, Drago paused on the mound to try to throw Foster off. Foster then stepped out again. Finally, after all the gamemanship was complete, Foster swung at the first pitch and was retired. What an anti-climax.

- The bottom of the ninth provided second-guessers with a ripe opportunity to question some on-field decisions. The scenario: the Sox had the bases loaded with nobody out. A fly ball was hit down the left field line. George Foster caught it in foul territory and threw out Denny Doyle, who was trying to score on a sacrifice fly. Both Foster and Doyle were second-guessed at the time. Should Foster have let the ball drop? Should Doyle have stayed put, knowing that he was likely to score when the bases were loaded with one out? After watching the play, I'd say that both players got it right. Foster, obviously, caught the ball and got the runner, so he is credited with a correct decision. And Doyle can't be blamed for his choice: the fly ball was deep enough to require a perfect throw to get the runner. Nine times out of ten, the runner scores; it was Doyle's bad luck that Foster's throw was dead on the money.

- Boston manager Darrell Johnson was nicknamed "Old Stone Face", and you could see why. When Bernie Carbo tied the game with a dramatic pinch-hit three-run home run, and all of Fenway Park was going completely crazy with joy, Johnson didn't move or even crack a smile. How can you remain so unemotional without going postal?

- Good lord, Roger Moret was thin.

- When did bullpen carts go out of fashion? In Game 6, relief pitchers were transported from the bullpen to the mound in a cutesy little cart whose roof was a stylized Sox cap. At some point, they stopped doing that.

- Third-base coach Don Zimmer didn't look much different then than he does today. It took me a moment to realize that Zimmer then was in his early 40's - the 1975 Zim had the same body shape as the 2003 Zim.

- When Carlton Fisk hit his game-winning home run in the 12th, many fans charged onto the field to congratulate the Sox catcher. I don't know when this stopped becoming commonplace, but it's a good thing that it did.

Anyway, it was a fun three and a half hours, and I recommend it to anyone with a high-speed connection.
Notes on Game 6 of the 1975 World Series | 8 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Coach - Saturday, December 13 2003 @ 11:20 AM EST (#83507) #
Thanks, Dave. That series was the best ever. I was rooting for both teams, because I'd grown up as a fan of Boston's AAA farm club (the Toronto Maple Leafs) and the Big Red Machine was impossible not to admire. They played great ball, and I don't believe there's ever been so much sustained drama.
_Andrew Edwards - Saturday, December 13 2003 @ 12:23 PM EST (#83508) #
A shorter set of notes on Game 1, 1988:

- Eighties pop-culture: Debbie Gibson sang the national anthem, Nancy Reagan threw out the first pitch, surrounded by kids with 'Say No To Drugs' T-Shirts. Mullets, especially on Jose Canseco and Kirk Gibson. Mike Davis was wearing glasses. Big, square glasses with lenses the size of coasters.

- Eighties archaisms: No computer-generated stats or graphics. Walkie-Talkies that looked like cellphones taped to the side of a brick. Vin Scully actually called Dave Stewart a "homeboy done well". I can only assume Vin wasn't familiar with "homeboy" as used in urban black culture.

- Vin Scully was outstanding. Like Joe Morgan when he stays to what he knows, Vin was just full of interesting and savvy observations of the little details of the game. Who was giving signs, why balls were hard to pick up from centre field, where the pitcher was positioned on the rubber, etc.

- More generally, though, however much we complain about sabre-ignorance among current announcers, we've come very, very far. Almost every .250 hitter with a low on-base was praised for being 'aggressive'. And there were a lot of them. Incidentally, if you download any of these legacy games, I recommend a quick review at Baseball Reference's team page first, to remind yourself who's on the team, how good they are, etc.

- The Dodgers offence sucked. Sucked. Alfredo Griffin was their starting SS, and managed to actually hit below the Mendoza line (looked good in the field, though, to me). Starting at 1B was non-entity Franklin Stubbs (.233/.288/.376). Gibson was their only offensive threat, and he was hurt. Their pitching was excellent, though, with Hersheiser, Leary, Belcher, Valenzuela to start, and an incredible bullpen - Holton (1.70), Orosco (2.72), Pena (1.91), and Howell (2.08). No question how this team made it to the WS.

- The A's were their inverse. Pitching was OK, but those starters were overrated by their wins. Welch, for instance, only had a 104 ERA+. Stewart (as scary as I remembered him) was only a 117 ERA+. Stewart also had an incredible 275 IP, so he was surely tired by this time. Their bullpen was weak after Eck. Offensively, The McGwire (.352/.478) & Canseco (.391/.569) duo was awesome, and Dave Henderson (.363/.525!) was a nice third threat. They were carrying some Proven Veteran dead wood (Parker (.314/.406), Baylor (.332/.346), Hassey), and LaRussa's line-up construction was dumb (3-4-5 was Canseco (R), Parker (L), McGwire (R)). But the core of their offence was just ferocious.

- Eck-as-a-one-inning-closer was still a new thing. The announcers were kind of struggling with him being used only for one inning, and were a little critical of it. They were surprised that 'only 16 of his 45 saves lasted more than 1 inning', and questioned whether having him pitch so little was really the best way to use him. Suggesting that the media aren't so much focussed on a given system, as they are on just keeping things the way they are.

- It was Boswell who broke the Canseco steroids story. He took a lot of crap from Vin Scully and Joe Garagiola over the story. Turns out he was right. What amazed me though was how strongly the announcers came out on Canseco's side. They were actually angry at Boswell.

- Remember Mickey Hatcher? He hit his second HR of 1988 in game 1 of the WS. Vin had a perfect comment to describe his character - "if ever a player should be called Skippy, it's Hatcher". What a fun guy to watch. I have a clear childhood memory of watching him and noting how his graying sideburns just didn't match his hyperactive ADD-style energy. Dude took a walk and didn't just run to first, a la Eckstien, but actually ran full throttle, his absolute top speed. Like he was stealing it.

- Stewart was a mean MF. First pitch of the game was nearly in Steve Sax's ear, after Beltcher had nicked Canseco's forearm in the top of the first.

- You could see the difference in the strike zone. A little more space on the outside corner (especially if you were Eckersley, or Stewart, or Leary, or really anyone other than poor Tim Belcher), a little less space at the top and bottom. I'm not sure it made much of a difference, but I'm now sure that they actually have started calling it differently.

- Lasorda started a rookie (Belcher) in game 1 of the WS, and the rookie melted down, walking everybody. LaRussa must have been having flashbacks with Ankiel a decade later.

- Canseco was very, very fit. But he moved badly, stiffly. His big swings left his wrists smacking into his upper back. His stance was hunched over in the upper back. His slides were those of someone who was more trying to imitate what a slide looked like than someone actually sliding. Didn't hurt him here, he was 23, fit, and very good. But you could easily understand why he would eventually break down.

- Canseco also relied too much on his upper body. He hit a grand slam early in this game, and he just killed it. But it was never an elegant swing; it was never a neat transfer of power. He was just way stronger than it. I compared mentally to Fred McGriff, who was never big but just made smooth contact with a neat transfer of his weight and lofted balls just as far. I also compared both them to Bonds, who is as strong as Canseco, but as precise as Tony Gwynn.

- The story, in case you don't remember the details: Gibson had a bad left hamstring and a bad right knee. He'd torn up the knee in game 7 of the NLCS. He was back in the training room for most of the game, getting therapy, shots, etc. In about the 7th inning, Vin Scully looked at the Dodger bench and noticed that Gibson wasn't there. He even made the comment on air, as the cameras panned the Dodger bench. No sign of Gibson - had the Dodgers packed him in? Apparently Gibson was watching the TV when Scully said that, and it got him angry. He told the trainer to ice his knee until he couldn't feel it, then went into the corridor and hit off a tee. He called the batboy over and asked the batboy to bring him Lasorda. By this time it was the ninth inning. The Dodgers had up Scioscia, Hamilton, Griffin, and the pitcher slot. Lasorda (what a fat man, by the way) went over, and Gibson told him, "if you want to pinch hit with Mike (Davis) for Alfredo (Griffin), then you go ahead. If we get a man on base, I'll come hit, and I think I can try to make something happen."

Scioscia and Hamilton made quick outs. Davis came up for Griffin, and walked from a 3-2 count against Eck. Lasorda was playing the whole thing for maximal drama, and he still had Gibson in the dugout while Davis was up, and some patsy in the on-deck circle. When Davis trotted down to first, the whole crowd just erupted. Then Gibson came out of the dugout and put on a helmet, and the whole audience just went apeshit. Everybody immediately to their feet. Eck took the count to 0-2 against Gibson, and Gibson's swings were just brutal. He could barely walk, and couldn't use his legs at all in his swing. It was like he was always off his front foot, just arms and prayer. The third pitch looked like the end of the game. Gibson barely hit it down the first base line. He tried to run, and I think probably hurt himself worse. The ball was just foul - just. Another foul ball, this one back, and things were looking bad. Eck then changed tack, and gave Gibson three straight balls, all just outside. Davis stole somewhere in there, which was dumb, but whatever. 3-2, 2 outs, bottom of the ninth. Tying run at second, winning run at the plate. The pitch...

Amazing game, surely one of the better I've ever seen. Recommended.
_Andrew Edwards - Saturday, December 13 2003 @ 12:33 PM EST (#83509) #
Dave, somehow unnoticed by me:

It didn't take me long to notice that, contrary to popular belief, the strike zone wasn't much different in 1975.

Me:

You could see the difference in the strike zone. A little more space on the outside corner (especially if you were Eckersley, or Stewart, or Leary, or really anyone other than poor Tim Belcher), a little less space at the top and bottom.

Small sample size meets subjective analysis, ladies & gents.
Mike D - Saturday, December 13 2003 @ 01:28 PM EST (#83510) #
Great work, Dave -- and a great comment by Andrew, too. This has inspired me to resume my "Greatest Ever" series -- I'll finish it by the New Year!
Mike Green - Saturday, December 13 2003 @ 01:38 PM EST (#83511) #
Thanks for the insights and the memories, Dave and Andrew. I'll have to try one of the old games after reading your comments; maybe one that I missed.
_A - Saturday, December 13 2003 @ 01:56 PM EST (#83512) #
What format do these films download in? Can you save them to your Hard Drive?
_Andrew Edwards - Saturday, December 13 2003 @ 02:07 PM EST (#83513) #
DRM-secured Realplayer video files. Kin dof a pain, but still a net positive value.

You can save them on your hard drive, and watch them as many times as you like.
_StephenT - Saturday, December 13 2003 @ 10:59 PM EST (#83514) #
I have a nice TV so I'm reluctant to watch games on a 17" computer monitor.

It's too bad there isn't a channel that regularly shows classic baseball games. (Yes, ESPN Classic Canada, that's a hint.)

I actually saw the '75 Game 6 a few years ago, though it was cut to 2 hours.

The classic channel does so many things wrong. Typically there is just one baseball game a week. Often it's a replay of one they've shown in the past year (e.g. the 1980 World Series game this week is one I watched when they showed it a while ago). A lot of the games are relatively recent (late 1990's or even 2000's).

They showed a lot of old Jays games in October, when most fans were watching the 2003 playoffs. In November-February they have no baseball competition, but they hardly show any games.

(Yes, we do like to watch baseball in the off-season, as Dave and Andrew have just indicated. Myself, I'm still watching tapes of the 2003 playoff games I missed (just finished watching ALCS Game 6, a late-afternoon game I missed the first time; what a mess Yankee stadium was in the wind)).

The best game shown by the classic channel recently was the 16-inning July 3, 1988 game (Canseco/McGwire at the Ex). It was the A's broadcast. They showed 3 hours of this one instead of 2, but it still wasn't enough. They cut 3 of Henke's 4 innings (but we got to hear them raving about how great Henke was during Cerutti's inning). They cut both of young Boomer's innings. It was a lot better than nothing, but they don't have much excuse for cutting the broadcasts down.

And they should do more games like that one: good games, not "special event" games like that Ripken ceremonial game shown over and over.

If I could pick one old game to see again, it would probably be the Aug 24, 1983 game, Jays at O's, excruciating as it was at the time.
Notes on Game 6 of the 1975 World Series | 8 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.