One of the game's most famous and most remarkable records has now stood for exactly one hundred years. (Well, now it's one hundred and three...)
It was September 22 1911, a Friday afternoon at Forbes Field, Pittsburgh's new brick ballyard. The visitors on this day were the Boston Rustlers - no longer the fabled Beaneaters who had dominated the game in the 1890s, and not yet the Braves. The Rustlers were a truly terrible team. They took a 34-101 record into the day's action (they would finish 44-107) and they featured one of the worst pitching staffs ever assembled. They would surrender a grisly 1021 runs before the season was over.
This was a noteworthy achievement indeed, for all the wrong reasons. Since 1900, only 11 teams have surrendered more than 1000 runs in a season. Six of those teams had the ill fortune to play during the Great Golden Age of Hitting (the 1930s, of course.) Just two staffs have surrendered that many runs in the last 70 years - the 1996 Tigers and the 1999 Rockies.
But the 1911 Boston Rustlers, the first of that sorry crew, were active before the great offensive explosion of the 1930s (and the lesser one of the 1990s.) This was long before the home run had become a central factor in the offensive game. Boston gave up their runs the old-fashioned way - by sheer ineptitude, and lots of it.
The staff was so bad that they had acquired Cleveland's ancient Cy Young in August. Young had turned 44 before the season began, and the big man had grown too portly to have much hope of fielding his position effectively. This was a significant problem back in 1911, when teams were in the habit of bunting as many as five or six times a game, sometimes more. That shortcoming notwithstanding, after a disastrous Boston debut (3 IP, 9 H, 8R) that Young was lucky to escape with a no decision - old Cy had quickly settled in as the best pitcher on the staff. That's not saying much, of course, but even so Young went 3-1, 1.50 over his next four starts, one of them a five-hit shutout of these same Pirates.
After that promising beginning, the old man had faltered. He was driven from the box in his next two starts, losing one of them and allowing 12 runs in just 8.2 innings.
But this Friday in Pittsburgh, matched up against Pirate ace Babe Adams (the 1909 WS hero, who would go 22-12, 2.33 in 1911) the old master was in the house, and he was able to turn back the clock one more time. The Rustlers squeezed out one run on a seventh inning single by Al Bridwell and it was all Young would need. He wasn't quite the man who had thrown baseball's very first perfect game, but he was quite good enough. He scattered nine hits on the day, didn't walk anyone, and retired pinch-hitter Tommy Leach with two out in the ninth to finish off the 76th shutout of his career.
Young's shutout against Pittsburgh that Friday afternoon 100 years ago brought his season record to 7-6 (4-2 with Boston.) It was the 511th win of his career. It would turn out to be the last. Three days later, he lost his next start 6-5 to the Cubs, giving up the winning run with one out in the ninth; five days after that the Reds beat him 4-1 in Cincinnati. This would be the 749th (we think!) and definitely the final complete game of his career. There's another record that looks pretty safe.
Finally, on October 6, Young took the mound for the second game of a double-header in Brooklyn. Through six innings, the score was tied at three. Then in the seventh, something went terribly wrong. Young retired the first batter. He then gave up a triple to Miller, an RBI single to Wheat (4-3 Brooklyn), a single to Northen, a two-run single to Daubert (6-3 Brooklyn), an RBI single to Daley (7-3 Brooklyn), and three straight RBI doubles to Hummel, Tooley, and Coulson. With Brooklyn now leading 10-3, Weaver relieved Young and allowed the eighth run of the inning to score.
That was Cy Young's last appearance in the majors. It would have been nice for a player so great to have had a more fitting swan song. Ah well - if things didn't end badly, they wouldn't end at all. Young would go to camp with the Red Sox in 1912. He even suited up for some games, and warmed up on the side occasionally. But he never felt capable of actually being able to pitch and in August he made his retirement official.
Half of his life was still ahead of him.
On the one hand, it is obvious that so long as people care about
baseball, Cy Young will never be forgotten. The annual award, the
unreachable records make sure of that. But even so, he isn't really
remembered. Not really. It's extremely unlikely, of course, that
there's anyone still alive who saw him play. But he seems to have left
very little behind, save those astounding numbers. He wasn't colourful,
like Waddell. He wasn't articulate and modern, like Mathewson. He was an
old-fashioned figure in his own day. He never played for a New York
team, which in terms of public recognition was even more important in
those days than it is now. The game didn't really start taking an
interest in its own history until the 1930s (when the first generation
of players was beginning to die off), with the advent of the Hall of
Fame, the All-Star Game, and some serious attention being paid to the
game's landmark achievements. Young was already in his 70s by then.
He was a farm boy from Tuscarawas County, Ohio. He was born in a
tiny place called Gilmore, and lived most of his life in an even tinier
one called Peoli. These were, and remain, rural communities in
Washington Township (the population of the township is less than a
thousand people.) Peoli consists of about ten houses, a church, and the
cemetery where Young himself now lies. It's mostly Amish country now,
and Young would not be out of place there today. He was a reserved and
decent man in a game populated largely by ruffians. The virtues of
country folk were his virtues - he was simple and pious (he refused to
play on the Sabbath in the early years of his career), he was
hard-working and honest (so much so that he was occasionally pressed
into service as an umpire if he didn't happen to be pitching that
day). He was not inclined to talk much about anything in general, and
himself in particular.
He was known as Dent Young or Farmboy
Young before acquiring, at the very beginning of his career, the
nickname that has now clung to him for more than a century. He'd left
school after the sixth grade to work on the family farm near Peoli, and
when baseball ended for him in 1912, he went back to the farm. In later
life, after the death of his wife in 1933, he found himself unwilling to
live on his farm anymore. He had also suffered some financial reversals
- he may have been too willing to assist other old ballplayers - and
so in 1935 he began living with his friends and neighbours John and Ruth
Benedum. He happily did outdoor work on their farm; he enjoyed
chopping wood, and he also believed the work kept him hale and hearty
(he was almost 80 years old by this time.) He was always willing to
turn up for baseball-related events, and in Reed Browning's remarkable
biography (Cy Young: A Baseball Life), there's a photograph of an
87 year old Young, leaning on a cane at Cleveland's old Municipal
Stadium watching batting practice in April 1954. The Korean War had
ended the year before. The American's League first African-American,
Larry Doby, was playing centre field for the Indians. They were taking
BP in a huge modern steel stadium that seated 73,000 people. And there
was Cy Young himself, born just after the Civil War had ended, who began
his career in flimsy wooden ballparks that burned down with regularity,
now nearing the end of his days, looking out over that baseball field.
(That's the
photograph; it's the reason I've re-posted this story on its third anniversary. I saw it in the
Browning biography and I must have stared at it for half an hour. I
found it absolutely haunting. It utterly mesmerized me, I couldn't stop looking at it, and thinking about it. Cy Young! In the flesh. And all those players, standing around the batting cage... did they have any idea who was standing in their midst? Cy Young, old-time pitcher. Did they know who he was? Who he really was? But I couldn't find the picture on-line when I wrote
this piece three years ago....)
Young
was a survivor of one of the last great changes in the game. When the
pitcher's mound was moved back to 60 feet, some of the best pitchers
around - Bill Hutchinson, George Haddock - lost much of their
effectiveness. Young and Kid Nichols - Young a big man, Nichols much
smaller, but both young men and hard throwers - were the pitchers who
made the transition with the least difficulty. Both would discover that
they couldn't pitch quite as many innings at the new distance,
and Young found it necessary to perfect a changeup to ease the strain on
his arm, but otherwise they carried on just as they had when they were
throwing from 50 feet.
Young's records look freakish and
unbelievable, but there was nothing freakish about him. He wasn't the
greatest pitcher who ever lived. He was seldom the
greatest pitcher in the game at any given moment. Nothing Young did in
any one season was beyond the reach of any of the other great pitchers
in the game at the time. He won more games than any pitcher who ever
lived, but he only led his league in wins five times. He pitched more
innings, he started and completed more games than any pitcher in history
- but he only led his league in games started once, innings pitched
twice, and complete games three times. There was usually
some other pitcher around who was a bit better than Young at a
particular moment. There was Kid Nichols and Amos Rusie in
the 1890s, there was Rube Waddell and Christy Mathewson after that. What
made Young special, if not unique, was his longevity, his ability to
maintain the same high level of performance over two whole decades. His
three best seasons came at ages 25, 34, and 41. There have been modern
pitchers just like this. Young was to his time what Warren Spahn or Don
Sutton were to theirs. Not quite the very best pitcher around, but
always one of the best.
He lived off his fastball and his
control - there were certainly others who threw
harder, but Young was always a power pitcher (the famous nickname came
from the
condition of a wooden fence he used to warm up against - an observer
said it looked as if it had been hit by a cyclone.) And he gave nothing
away. He was by far the
best control pitcher of his time. What would he have been had he been
born 100 years later, in 1967? I assume he would have been exactly what
he was in his own time. All the advances, in training and nutrition and
coaching, that have made modern players so much better would also have
made him better, bigger, and stronger. If he had been born in
1967, I assume he would have been an outstanding pitcher for close on 20
years, and quite likely won 300 games or so. The changes in the game
ensure that his numbers would look drastically different - in his career, Cy Young gave
up the same number of home runs as Eddie Guardado - but a great player is
a great player. He would have started and won fewer games, struck out
more batters, allowed more home runs... but the same man, moved to this
place on the space-time continuum, would have been what he was.
So let me just say this about him: he was a real man, a real player. He really did those things - pitched all those innings, won all those games. Lived a life, had a career. We can't really remember him, of course. None of us were there. We can just try to see what he was a little better...
https://www.battersbox.ca/article.php?story=20110829003302814