Doc was in control again. Jays win 6-1.
In other news Scott Rolen is going to be on a regular rest schedule to help his shoulder.
Who would have thought a player with shoulder problems who has been declining since he entered his 30s would be struggling this year at the plate?
Year | Games | Abs | Ave | OBP | SLG | OPS |
2002 | 55 | 205 | 0.278 | 0.354 | 0.561 | 0.915 |
2003 | 154 | 559 | 0.286 | 0.382 | 0.528 | 0.910 |
2004 | 142 | 500 | 0.314 | 0.409 | 0.598 | 1.007 |
2005 | 56 | 196 | 0.235 | 0.323 | 0.383 | 0.706 |
2006 | 142 | 521 | 0.296 | 0.369 | 0.518 | 0.887 |
2007 | 112 | 392 | 0.265 | 0.331 | 0.398 | 0.729 |
2008 | 84 | 303 | 0.254 | 0.347 | 0.409 | 0.756 |
My initial reaction is the Jays are trading for the:And remember, Ricciardi said one of the benefits of the trade was that they have Rolen for two more years (at $11 million/year) whereas they'd probably lose Glaus after this season.And on top of all of that, the Cardinals are essentially dumping Rolen because he can't get along with LaRussa. Then the Cardinals got a concession from Glaus to make the deal (whether that's a good idea is another issue).
- Worse player, coming from the inferior league
- Older player
- Player with the more significant injury history (I'll take the foot problem over the shoulder problem)
- Player with the longer contract
This deal only makes sense if one thinks that Rolen can overcome his shoulder problems. I'm skeptical about that. After a strong 2006 you'd think he'd be pretty healthy coming into 2007 and yet he slugged under .400 every month except July and then had surgery again.
https://www.battersbox.ca/article.php?story=20080805083105395