The 2004 MLB First Year Player Draft on June 7th is rich in college pitching. It’s expected that Jered Weaver of Long Beach State and Justin Verlander of Old Dominion will go to San Diego and Detroit with the top 2 picks of the draft. The rest of the first round is expected to be dominated by pitching as well.
YOUR Toronto Blue Jays have the 16th selection in the first round. With an exceptionally weak hitting class it’d be no surprise to see the Jays look toward selecting a pitcher or two at the top of the draft.
In addition to their normal picks the Jays also picked up 2 additional draft choices for Escobar signing with the Angels. One is a sandwich pick between round 1 and 2, and the 2nd pick is the Angels' 3rd round pick.
Below is a list and profile of 25 top college pitching prospects.
First, a few notes on the statistics shown:
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching. FIP = (13*HR+3*BB-2*K)/IP. A discussion of FIP can be found here. The lower the score the better. Calculations are made on the raw, unadjusted college statistics.
xRSAA: Adjusted runs saved above average. This statistic was generated by Craig Burley and adjusts the raw college statistics for park effects and competition.
RA+: Adjusted runs allowed. Similar to ERA+ this is a rate stat with 100 as a midpoint. Again, this was generated by Craig Burley and adjusts the raw college stats for park effects and competition
Adjusted stats are only available for 2003. However, for 2004 you can get a rough idea of how a player would stack up based on the improvement (or decline) in stats from the previous year. While competition and park factors will change year to year I think generally you can assume that each school will have similar adjustments year to year.
2004 statistics are based on games played through April 24th.
To learn more about each of the players on the list click on their name for detailed profiles.
Onto the rankings!
#1 Jered Weaver – Long Beach St
Brother of Jeff Weaver of the Dodgers and a cousin of Jed Weaver of the SF 49ers, Jered has been the dominant pitcher in college baseball at Long Beach State this year. Weaver is expected to be the top pick of the draft going to the Padres.
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 1.13 87.2 13.6 1.2 0.2 -2.3
2003 1.96 133.1 9.7 1.4 0.5 -1.0 79.6 268
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 1.28 84.2 11.2 3.5 0.3 -0.9
2003 2.20 118.2 12.5 3.5 0.2 -1.4 65.1 284
2002 2.28 51.1 9.0 3.9 0.7 0.3
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 1.41 76.2 11.9 2.5 0.2 -1.5
2003 3.30 128.0 9.7 2.7 0.8 0.0 54.8 204
2002 2.77 110.2 10.6 3.5 0.7 -0.2
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 2.59 55.2 10.3 2.9 0.5 -0.6
2003 1.70 137.1 10.2 2.3 0.4 -0.9 77.6 370
2002 3.11 66.2 7.2 3.7 0.1 -0.2
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.67 76.0 12.8 4.3 0.7 -0.4
2003 2.40 116.1 10.8 3.3 0.2 -1.1 46.6 194
2002 1.90 113.2 10.9 3.4 0.2 -1.1
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.10 69.2 9.6 1.6 0.5 -0.9
2003 2.50 115.0 9.6 2.3 0.5 -0.6 51.7 225
2002 4.37 101.0 7.6 2.8 0.8 0.4
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 1.90 80.2 11.8 3.4 0.4 -0.8
2003 2.52 114.1 8.3 3.4 0.2 -0.4 52.9 230
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 2.81 80.0 12.0 3.4 0.8 -0.4
2003 5.79 37.1 10.7 6.1 20.2 168
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 2.71 76.1 11.4 2.5 0.2 -1.4
2003 2.27 95.0 11.4 2.5 0.8 -0.6 36 234
2002 1.68 59.0 11.9 2.9
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.14 66.0 11.0 2.0 0.4 -1.2
2003 3.48 82.2 9.0 5.1 0.3 0.2 23.2 138
2002 2.43 37.0 10.7 7.5 0.5 0.8
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 1.27 28.1 9.3 2.6 0.3 -0.7
2003 1.33 74.1 8.4 1.6 0.4 -0.8 50.3 471
2002 0.96 47.0 9.4 1.7 0.4 -1.0
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.32 59.2 11.3 2.4 1.1 -0.2
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.25 63.2 8.5 4.4 0.3 0.0
2003 3.22 95.0 6.7 2.7 0.7 0.4 38.2 227
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 4.43 85.1 9.0 3.9 0.3 -0.2
2003 2.60 100.1 9.9 3.8 0.4 -0.4 42.6 235
2002 2.75 98.1 7.8 2.2 0.0 -1.0
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.61 72.1 9.6 2.1 0.5 -0.7
2003 4.31 112.2 6.0 2.3 1.0 0.8 14.7 110
2002 4.77 83.0 5.0 2.6 0.9 1.0
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 1.93 37.1 8.2 1.7 0.7 -0.2
2003 2.94 52.0 10.6 1.2 0.9 -0.7 25.1 187
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.26 60.2 8.2 2.4 0.9 0.3
2003 2.91 105.1 10.0 2.0 0.4 -1.0 42.8 217
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.77 57.1 10.1 5.5 0.5 0.3
2003 2.71 79.2 10.0 4.3 0.2 -0.5 23.7 174
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.46 65.0 9.1 3.5 1.4 1.1
2003 3.99 88.0 5.9 2.1 1.2 1.2 27.8 163
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.12 75.0 10.2 4.4 0.5 -0.1
2003 5.20 72.2 8.4 5.1 0.5 0.6 24.4 126
2002 3.35 75.1 10.1 5.3 0.4 0.0
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 4.02 47.0 10.9 4.2 0.2 -0.7
2003 3.57 45.1 9.4 3.8 0.2 -0.5 8.3 125
2002 3.08 52.2 8.8 3.8 0.0 -0.7
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 3.49 49.0 9.9 3.9 0.6 -0.1
2003 3.77 86.0 7.5 3.2 19.6 122
2002 5.28 58.0 9.8 6.1
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 1.24 72.1 10.7 2.6 0.4 -1.0
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 2.41 78.1 9.0 1.6 0.5 -0.8
2003 3.02 125.0 8.1 2.4 0.6 -0.1 34.2 139
2002 3.63 39.2 9.4 4.1 0.2 -0.4
Year ERA Inn K/9 BB/9 HR/9 FIP xRSAA RA+
2004 1.77 71.0 9.3 2.3 0.4 -0.7
2003 3.71 102.0 7.7 3.4 0.2 -0.3 17.2 138
2002 5.31 84.2 7.5 4.8 0.6 0.9
https://www.battersbox.ca/article.php?story=20040428095843999