Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
Not too many positives come out of a season where you end up with 90+ losses. However, one of these positives is a high draft pick in the following year's draft.

For the 2005 draft in June the Jays will be picking 6th. JP Ricciardi has had three drafts as GM of Toronto and the team's emphasis in those years has been college players, particularly pitchers at the top of the draft.

The upcoming draft appears to be stronger among position players than pitchers. Given that, and the current strength in pitching working its way up through the minor leagues, it's likely that the Jays will take a position player with their first pick.

Mike Moffatt did an excellent job looking at the expected production of a player taken with the 6th pick. Now we'll try and see who that player might be.

Here's a list of college players who the Jays could be considering with their first pick. Keep in mind that these players have only played two years of college baseball (with one exception) and their draft status could change considerably between now and the draft.

The 'Burley Rankings' listed in the player profiles are the rankings of college hitters and pitchers based on their statistics in the 2003/2004 college season. These statistics are adjusted for both competition and park factors. Also consider that these rankings include players that were drafted this season

The list of players below are ranked by their Burley Ranking. However, these rankings are not rankings of the future potential of the player, just how they performed against their peers in college this year. The links of the players are to their profile at their college, but unfortunately in most cases the profiles have not been updated for the 2004 baseball season.

Jed Lowrie, 2B, Stanford
6'0", 180 lbs, 4/17/84
Hits: R – Throws: R
04 Burley Ranking - 1
Year	ABs	Ave	Obp	Slg
2004 233 0.399 0.505 0.734
2003 212 0.292 0.349 0.349


The Cardinal switch hitter went from a decent college player to a great college player in his sophomore campaign. For his junior year he’s expected to move over to shortstop.

His BB/K ratio? 47/36 – not too bad. Is that ISO slg% of .335 inflated by his home park? Nope, Stanford’s park is close to neutral.

Wade Townsend, RHP, Rice
6'4", 225 lbs, RHP, 2/22/83
04 Burley Ranking - 4
Year	Inn	ERA	K/9	BB/9	HR/9
2004 120.1 1.80 11.1 3.4 0.4
2003 118.2 2.20 12.5 3.5 0.2
2002 51.1 2.28 9.0 3.9 0.7


Townsend apparently will be back in the 2005 draft after being selected 8th overall by the Orioles this year. He signed with an agent, but also enrolled back in school. The NCAA ruled that since he was enrolled in classes that he could no longer negiotiate with the Orioles, which is welcome news for teams looking for a deeper 2005 draft.

Here’s what Baseball America had to say about Townsend:

Many scouts are projecting Townsend as a big league closer, but he has the stuff to pitch in the front of a big league rotation. His fastball velocity has fluctuated this spring, sitting at 87-89 or 90-91 mph at various times, but he has also hit 95. He also throws the nastiest curveball among the Rice trio, though sometimes it breaks so much that he can struggle to control it. He'll throw an occasional changeup to lefthanders, a pitch that needs refinement.

Alex Gordon, 3B, Nebraska
6'1", 205 lbs, 2/10/84
Hits: L – Throws: R
04 Burley Ranking - 5
Year	ABs	Ave	Obp	Slg
2004 211 0.365 0.493 0.754
2003 216 0.319 0.426 0.495


Like Lowrie, Gordon really improved his game from his freshman to sophomore year. Also like Lowrie, Gordon sports a nifty BB/K ratio of 47/34. And like Lowrie, Gordon’s ISO slg% of .389 isn’t helped much as Nebraska’s park plays pretty neutral.

Brad Corley, OF, Mississippi St.
6'1", 198 lbs, 12/28/83
Hits: R – Throws: R
04 Burley Ranking - 14
Year	ABs	Ave	Obp	Slg
2004 245 0.380 0.442 0.678
2003 224 0.321 0.377 0.402


What’s to like? Solid across the board in an extreme pitcher’s park (75 PF). What’s there to be concerned about here? Just 17 walks and 44 strikeouts.

Mike Pelfrey, RHP, Wichita St
6'7", 215 lbs, 1/14/84
04 Burley Ranking - 27
Year	Inn	ERA	K/9	BB/9	HR/9
2004 115.1 2.18 9.8 1.9 0.2
2003 104.2 2.49 8.5 1.3 0.8


A 2nd team BA All American on the list Pelfrey is impressive, especially in terms of keeping the ball in the park. He also has a very low walk rate for someone that’s 6’7”.

Stephen Head, 1B, Mississippi
6'2", 220 lbs, 1/13/84
Hits: L – Throws: L
04 Burley Ranking - 60
Year	ABs	Ave	Obp	Slg
2004 228 0.346 0.419 0.583
2003 208 0.337 0.385 0.490


Head is both a 1B and pitcher, but it looks like it’s his bat that’s going to take him places. While his stats aren’t quite as gaudy as others, he plays in an extreme pitchers park (PF 73). Head played in the Cape Cod league this summer and was rated the #5 prospect by Baseball America after hitting .271/.333/.407. Here’s what BA has to say:

“Head had one of the best pure swings on the Cape. He's still learning to drive the ball for power, but there's little doubt that it eventually will come, and he's also a solid defender at first base.”

The final 4 players listed here were in Baseball America's projected top 10 draft picks as of October 2004. None of these players are overwhelming statistically, but must have something going for them to be rated that high by BA.

Luke Hochavar, RHP, Tennessee
6'5', 205 lbs, 9/15/83
04 Burley Ranking - 215
Year	Inn	ERA	K/9	BB/9	HR/9
2004 63 2.86 8.6 3.3 1.0
2003 77.2 4.64 8.5 2.8 1.0


Hochevar is another big pitcher with a strong K rate. During his freshman year he was used primarily out of the bullpen (5 starts in 21 appearances). This past season Hochevar was used more as a starter but he only made 9 starts for the Volunteers due to injury. First Hochevar endured a calf injury, and was later then hit in the head by a freak line drive during batting practice. Prior to the end of the season Hochevar was back pitching again.

Jeff Clement, C, USC
6'1", 205 lbs, 8/21/83
Bats: L - Throws: R
04 Burley Ranking - 339
Year	ABs	Ave	Obp	Slg
2004 198 0.293 0.416 0.515
2003 208 0.298 0.402 0.649


Clement has a strong freshman year as he was named the 'Collegiate Baseball Freshman National Co-Player of the Year'. Heading into his sophomore campaign Clement was a Baseball America Preseason All-America first team, but he didn't have quite the same level of success in year 2 as his slugging dropped over 100 points. Perhaps there was something in the USC water as 2004 Blue Jay draft pick Joey Metropoulos watched his slugging percentage each year at USC.

Troy Tulowitzki, SS, Long Beach St
6'3", 200 lbs, 10/10/84
Bats: R - Throws: R
04 Burley Ranking - 530
Year	ABs	Ave	Obp	Slg
2004 230 0.317 0.410 0.491
2003 196 0.270 0.307 0.408


Tyler Greene, SS, Georgia Tech
6'2", 188 lbs, 8/17/83
Bats: R - Throws: R
04 Burley Ranking - 785
Year	ABs	Ave	Obp	Slg
2004 256 0.273 0.371 0.434
2003 228 0.316 0.391 0.474


Green, a 2nd round pick of the Atlanta Braves coming out of high school, was voted the winner of the Cape Cod's league 'Top Prospect' award after hitting .296/.413/.424 this summer. According to Baseball America Green's "arm, hands and range are all above-average, though Greene got a little lackadaisical on routine plays this summer".


Outlook:
Given their draft history it's almost certain that the Jays will take a college player with their first pick at #6. However, at this time it's way too early to project what specific player the Jays may take with their pick as all of these players will get almost another full season of college baseball under their belt before they're drafted. Over the next 8 months some could cement their status at the top of the draft, while others could drop sharply in the draft. Other players could also vault ahead of these players with a strong junior year - it's very common for college players to take a leap forward in their junior year as they mature. Regardless of what some specific players do between now and May it looks as if the Jays will be able to have their choice between several top prospects.

Having said all that it's still fun to spectulate. At this point I'll guess that the Jays will end up selecting Stephen Head. Part of this reasoning is that there's been more emphasis on pitching and the middle infield in prior drafts, the Jays are relatively young in Toronto in the OF, there's a need for a big time power bat in the organization, there isn't a sure thing among 1B in the minors, and the Jays seem to like players that perform well in the Cape Cod League (where the college players are using wood bats).
2005 Draft - Pick Six | 31 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
_Jim Acker - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 04:20 PM EDT (#26413) #
Two words: Justin Upton
Craig B - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 04:24 PM EDT (#26414) #
Who will be gone by the #3 pick at the latest, and who will want an outrageous sum of money to boot. I wouldn't pick Upton.
_whizland2000 - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 04:32 PM EDT (#26415) #
if upton is available at the 6th spot (which he won't be) then you have to strongly consider taking him. JP has said in the past that with draft picks money is not a big issue and that it's more importent to draft the right guy instead of the guy who wants the less the money.
_Ron - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 04:49 PM EDT (#26416) #
I wonder if JP will take the best player available or the best player that fits the Jays needs ie. A position player with lots of pop
_Moffatt - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 04:50 PM EDT (#26417) #
Best player.

Mind you I have a feeling Best Player and Best Player Available are going to be entirely the same thing for the #6 overall pick.

I'd be shocked if the Jays took a pitcher.
_Brian B. - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 05:00 PM EDT (#26418) #
I'll guess Stephen Head too!
_R Billie - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 05:35 PM EDT (#26419) #
I don't think the Jays can afford to make their first selection based on their system needs. A #6 pick has to be the player you think will turn out the best in the majors. If that's Head then fine but one has to be a very special hitter to be taken that high when he plays at the low end of the defensive spectrum in college.

As such, it wouldn't surprise me in the least to see them take another pitcher, middle infielder, or outfielder. I think it's very likely they will take a bat unless there's a pitcher that blows them away who they think can zoom through to the majors. Though I don't want to see them use that pick on a polished pitcher who has the ceiling of a #3 starter.
_Scott - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 05:47 PM EDT (#26420) #
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/leagues/HS_amateur/041007youthpoy.html
COMN for a story about Cameron Maybin, who is ranked #2 by BA, also a high schooler.

I would think the Jays would have to give serious consideration to John Mayberry Jr, if he can put together a good year. The organization does not have much in the way of right handed power hitting prospects.
_Caino - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 06:10 PM EDT (#26421) #
How does the draft work in later rounds? Do they do reverse the order round by round, or will they Jays be picking 6th straight through?
_Rob - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 06:15 PM EDT (#26422) #
The latter. Jays pick 6th each round in 2005.
Pistol - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 07:21 PM EDT (#26423) #
I don't think the Jays can afford to make their first selection based on their system needs. A #6 pick has to be the player you think will turn out the best in the majors.

I agree, but if you can't separate them you might as well go for need.

one has to be a very special hitter to be taken that high when he plays at the low end of the defensive spectrum in college.

Now I'm curious........

Here's the 1B (at the time of the draft) selected in the top 11 picks in the last 15 drafts. College players have a * by their name.

1990 - Marc Newfield
1991 - David McCarty*
1995 - Todd Helton*
1996 - Travis Lee
1997 - JJ Davis
1998 - Pat Burrell*
1998 - Carlos Pena*
2000 - Adrian Gonzalez
2002 - Prince Fielder
2003 - Michael Aubrey*

I was slightly surprised that there were so few 1B taken at the top of the draft. Like everything else in the draft it's a lot of hit and miss.
_Magpie - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 07:41 PM EDT (#26424) #
I was slightly surprised that there were so few 1B taken at the top of the draft. Like everything else in the draft it's a lot of hit and miss.

Major league organizations are almost certainly thinking that if someone is already playing 1B before they turn pro, then they are not looking at a good athlete. If the player was a good athlete, he'd be playing another infield spot, or at least be an OF (if he throws LH.)

And of course a great many current ML first baseman started their pro careers at another position - we have catchers (Delgado, Hatteburg), third basemen (Thome, Giambi, Teixeira), outfielders (Palmeiro, Erstad), even a pitcher (Olerud)
_Magpie - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 07:42 PM EDT (#26425) #
Hang on - Olerud did not start his pro career as a pitcher.

He was a mighty good one in college, though.
_greenfrog - Wednesday, October 13 2004 @ 09:55 PM EDT (#26426) #
Interesting post about the 1B draftees. I seem to recall that JP wanted Michael Aubrey (2-year minor league totals: .320/.403/.516) in the 2003 draft. Aubrey was selected 11th overall. The Jays chose Aaron Hill (2-year totals: .294/.378/.413) with the 13th overall pick.

Who would I rather have at this point? I would have to go with Aubrey, given Russ Adams's strong September performance in Toronto--the Jays need a good 1B prospect more than another SS. Although I suppose it's not a bad thing to have a second good prospect at short (and Hill may be able to step in at 3B if Hinske continues to falter).
_Lee - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 12:51 AM EDT (#26427) #
I've been thinking Stephen Head for a while. Well, at first glance. Might change after I see everyone's performances next season, but I'd say Head has the early lead.
_Matt - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 01:12 AM EDT (#26428) #
Is there really a problem in going with Townshend? It would just seem to me that going with a pitcher who can dominate that consistently in the div 1 level is never really a bad idea... power hitting need or no....
_Jacko - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 01:56 AM EDT (#26429) #

Who would I rather have at this point? I would have to go with Aubrey, given Russ Adams's strong September performance in Toronto--the Jays need a good 1B prospect more than another SS. Although I suppose it's not a bad thing to have a second good prospect at short (and Hill may be able to step in at 3B if Hinske continues to falter).

In June, I thought that Hill was a far inferior prospect to Conor Jackson and Michael Aubrey, who were the other big college hitters taken in the 1st round in 2003. Now that the dust has settled, it's arguable that Hill posted the best numbers of the three:

Aaron Hill
DOB: Mar 21, 1982
AA: 279/368/410, 63/61 BB/K in 480 AB

Michael Aubrey
DOB: Apr 15, 1982
A+: 339/438/550, 27/26 BB/K in 218 AB
AA: 261/340/425, 15/18 BB/K in 134 AB

Conor Jackson
DOB: May 7, 1982
A+: 345/438/562, 45/36 BB/K in 258 AB
AA: 301/367/456, 24/36 BB/K in 226 AB

Know what?

The jump from A+ to AA is hard to make. And Hill was asked to do it 3 months before Jackson and Aubrey.

Jackson posted his numbers in great hitters parks in hitters leagues, while Hill toiled in the best pitching park in what is traditionally a pitchers league. Aubrey played great in a a pitcher's league (Carolina) but seemed to hit a wall when promoted to AA. And judging from his low AB totals, Aubrey missed some time due to injuries.

The similarites in their AA numbers is quite striking. They all hit for modest power, strikeout infrequently, and draw walks at a slightly above average rate. The tiebreaker here is that Hill is going to eventually play SS or 3B, which is a lot more valuable than OF (Jackson) or 1B (Aubrey).

Hill is going to be a very good player. Maybe not superstar good, but a solid contributor at a "premium position". Which will definitely help push the Jays towards the playoffs.
Craig B - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 09:09 AM EDT (#26430) #
Head has the early lead

I wish he did, but Stephen Head has pretty significant problems for a top prospect. First, is the old pitcher-or-hitter dilemma... which do you do with him? That also creates the problem of overinflating his perceived value, since he's not going to be both (or at least, he's very unlikely to be both).

As a hitter, he doesn't draw walks. He doesn't strike out a whole lot, which is actually a very good sign, but the fact is he has a worse K/W ratio than you'd like.

On the other hand, as a pitcher he's got great control, which is really nice to see (it also shows that he understands the concept of control of the strike zone, which is great). But as a pitcher he's seen as a relief prospect, and while the Jays have done a good job in some instances at turning relief guys into starters, there's no particular reason to suspect that Head is susceptible to this kind of move.

Overall, I like him more as a pitcher, but he's not the kind of pitcher who's worth a top draft pick. I'll be looking at his performance closely this year.
Craig B - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 09:09 AM EDT (#26431) #
By "top draft pick", I mean in the top 10. Head would be a fine choice as a pitcher in the lower part of the first round or as a sandwich pick.
Craig B - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 09:26 AM EDT (#26432) #
A propos of nothing, one A-ball pitcher people should really be looking out for is R.J. Swindle, a big soft-tossing lefty who was a Red Sox draftee this past year. He misses a lot of bats and had two fantastic years at a smaller D1 college (Charleston Southern), then went to Lowell and tore the NYP league apart in a long relief role - 4 walks, no homers and 56 Ks in 51 innings.
Craig B - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 09:31 AM EDT (#26433) #
Swindle throws a fastball, cutter, change, slider (his out pitch) and a new out pitch, a slow, bendy, knuckle-type curve.

Even better? He was born in Vancouver (but he lives in Florida).
Pistol - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 10:26 AM EDT (#26434) #
Is there really a problem in going with Townsend?

Not at all. My thinking was that he'd be taken before the Jays made a pick (although BA had Townsend ranked 6th).

My belief is that the cost of acquiring pitching is more than the cost of acquiring hitting (either in terms of prospects in trade or $ for free agents). So having a 'surplus' of pitching isn't really that much of a problem - you can always move pitching for hitting, or use your free agent money more efficiently on a bat than an arm. I think the main concern is that there's more of a risk of injury with a pitcher.
Pistol - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 10:30 AM EDT (#26435) #
First, is the old pitcher-or-hitter dilemma... which do you do with him?

Head didn't pitch at all in the Cape Cod League this summer, which leads me to think that he's more focused on hitting, or has been told by someone that he has more of a future there took that advice.
Pistol - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 10:37 AM EDT (#26436) #
he has more of a future there took that advice

he has more of a future there *AND* took that advice
_Jordan - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 11:31 AM EDT (#26437) #
The more I see from Aaron Hill, the more I think he's going to be Toronto's starting third baseman in 2006.
Mike Green - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 01:47 PM EDT (#26438) #
Swindle throws a fastball, cutter, change, slider (his out pitch) and a new out pitch, a slow, bendy, knuckle-type curve.

Great name for a soft-tossing lefty, too.
_Scott - Thursday, October 14 2004 @ 08:05 PM EDT (#26439) #
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/news/041014verlander.html
Looks like Justin Verlander may be heading back into the draft. COMN
_Tom - Friday, October 15 2004 @ 02:59 PM EDT (#26440) #
I'm hoping that they take Head (if he's available): but this draft philosophy of taking college kids TO THE ABSOLUTE AND UTTER EXCLUSION OF ANY OTHER KIND OF PLAYER IMAGINABLE is a bunch of baloney and a slap in the face to what was once known as the "Blue Jay Way"...but, that's my own rant.

This web site is great, by the way.
Craig B - Friday, October 15 2004 @ 03:08 PM EDT (#26441) #
this draft philosophy of taking college kids TO THE ABSOLUTE AND UTTER EXCLUSION OF ANY OTHER KIND OF PLAYER IMAGINABLE

The Blue Jays do select high school and junior college players in the draft, and they do sign players from Latin America and Asia. I'm not sure there are any other markets worth being in.
TamRa - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 09:59 PM EST (#103361) #
Meh. I like Gordon, so far.
Ryan01 - Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 11:52 PM EST (#103365) #
Just to update, Stanford 2B and top of the 04 Burley ranking, Jed Lowrie is off to another great start. He's hitting .354 with 7 HR's in his first 48 at-bats. That's an .833 SLG% folks. I know the scouts aren't as high on him as an Upton or Gordon but he's no Dustin Pedroia or David Eckstein either. He's definitely someone who could sneak his way into the top 10 if he just keeps flat out performing. I don't remember hearing the words "Jered Weaver" and "first overall pick" being muttered by anyone at this point last year and I suspect that, as always, a lot of things will change in the final 4 months before the draft.

2005 Draft - Pick Six | 31 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.