Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine Batter's Box Interactive Magazine
According to a very interesting Washington Post article, MLB is taking a look at measures to test Dominican prospects for drugs. This follows some shocking and brutal revelations in another recent Post article that Dominican prospects are abusing drugs and supplements intended for veterinary use. At least two young ballplayers, Lino Ortiz and William Felix, have died after taking stimulants, dietary supplements, or steroids intended for horses and other animals.


What is most revealing about the article is the position of Rob Manfred, MLB's VP of labor and human resources. He stated that "We'd like to do something about the problem that is: a) not prohibitively expensive and b) practical. . . . We don't want to flush a lot of money down the toilet." All U.S. minor leaguers are going to be tested this year, a plan which will cost $1.25 million, but even random tests may be too expensive for MLB in the Caribbean. Manfred said that testing for steroids would be prohibitively expensive in the Dominican Republic, but we aren't talking about players who are using high-tech masking agents here. MLB could always ask WADA (the World Anti-Doping Agency) for help; WADA are well used to supervising testing at far-flung competitions all across the globe, including in countries poorer than the Dominican Republic. MLB aren't likely to do that, since it would engender uncomfortable questions from WADA about why MLB aren't doing more to stop doping. (WADA, of course, is completely wacky... their insistence that the international chess and bridge federations test for drugs if they hope to be chosen for Olympic competition is clearly insane. But they know drug testing better than anyone.)

Incidentally, doesn't it make you mad when the media describe MLB as "baseball"? Nobody calls Stu Jackson "basketball senior vice-president" but Manfred gets described as "baseball's VP".

The news on Dave Berg is becoming more disturbing. Berg has been put on the 15-day DL (with Howie Clark replacing him from Syracuse) due to fatigue. Berg has been unable to take infield practice, and according to a report gets fatigued after taking only a few grounders. This is following incidents with dizzy spells last month. Unfortunately, all the tests on Berg have come up negative, so for now it appears to be a question of waiting the problem out.

The Marlins whaled on the Braves last night, with a final score of 20-1, but the worst casualty wasn't any of the Braves pitchers. A photographer (at time of writing he hadn't been identified) was struck in the head by Darren Bragg's bat when it "flew out of his hands" after a seventh-inning swing. Apparently the photographer's face was cut (and bleeding all over), but there were no other reports of injuries; he was airlifted to hospital. It's easily the most damage that Bragg has done with his bat this season... he's hitting .149/.196/.161, with one extra-base hit (a double) and four walks versus 21 strikeouts in 87 at-bats.

You'll have noticed I put "flew out of his hands" in scare quotes. That's because though it's the phrase that's always used, it isn't really the right phrase, is it? The bat isn't flying. It's being flung, by a player who's too careless to keep his grip on the bat or use a little pine tar or a larger knob on the handle. Those of us who watched the Jays-Expos series on the weekend saw Endy Chavez indulge in some sort of bizarre bat-throwing festival, with the lumber spinning toward the dugout five times in three games. It's not like the bat taking off is going to be a surprise to the player, or if it has a mind of its own. I'm not shedding crocodile tears for the poor photographer; those guys (and ladies) know the risks they take when they step into the photographers' enclosure, right in the line of fire. But the umpires could easily get the players to keep a grip on their bats, simply by offering a warning to the player who does it. Foul balls are dangerous enough.

Brian Jordan is heading for knee surgery (likely but not definite), and I'm starting to wonder if retirement mightn't be in the offing too. Jordan is 36, and his football days couldn't have helped his knees any. This isn't a ligament problem, just the patellar tendon, but still it's at least possible that he would consider hanging up his spikes since surgery would end his season. The Dodgers hold a $10.5 million option on Jordan for next year, but they might take the $2.5 million buyout option instead; instead of testing the newly chilly free-agent market at 37, Jordan might want to negotiate a settlement now, while he can walk. The tough thing is that Jordan's hitting as well as he ever has - a remarkably consistent player - and naturally might want to add to his legacy or his bank account.

Don't forget about me! One of the two potential buyers for the Montreal Expos has reiterated his interest. Robert Johnson had been using the Expos as a stalking horse in order to pursue his desired NBA expansion team (Johnson was using MLB, presumably, as extra leverage in order to extract a good price from the NBA, who were desperate to add a black owner to their stable). Now, the first real potential owner has announced himself again - he's Mark Broxmeyer, a New York real estate developer. He doesn't apparently care whether the team goes into D.C. itself or into Northern Virginia - which has to make the local fans feel good, knowing that Broxmeyer's scouted the situation so thoroughly. Broxmeyer is up to his armpits in Middle East politics, especially in Israel and in Iraq where he's a supporter of Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmad Chalabi. He's an amateur "national security analyst", a darling of the FOX "News" crowd, and an admirer, backer, and confidant of Steve Forbes of all people. A thoroughly detestable character, if you ask me... which would surely give him the inside track with MLB. Fred Malek's group, which is also interested, have been quiet recently but are also building support. Both groups have lined up investment bankers, which means real money is getting spent. Malek, of course, was the guy who drew up a list of Jews working in the Bureau of Labor Statistics for Richard Nixon while he was deputy director for CREEP. Malek and Broxmeyer (Chairman for the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) should join forces... I'm sure they'd get along great.

MLB's reps have been skipping out on meetings with D.C. councillors and others. Yet another indication that the plans to move the Expos are going nowhere.

Incidentally, the San Antonio Express had the best line this week about the Expos... the unchallenged line that "Baseball says the Expos don't generate enough revenue to compete in Montreal". Meanwhile, the Expos are in the thick of the wild-card race, where they will likely stay for a while longer, thanks to the White Sox sweeping in and trading for Roberto Alomar. Apparently, Omar Minaya was trying to acquire Alomar for Montreal, a disastrous move in the making. Alomar would have played second base with Jose Vidro moving to third, a nonsensical shuffling of the deck when Expos third baseman Jamey Carroll is as good a hitter as Alomar anyway. I like what Minaya has done, and the respect he gets around the league is gratifying to Expos fans, but there are times that I swear he doesn't watch his own ballclub. FREE TERRMEL SLEDGE! Have a great day.
Notes : We'd Love To Help, Here's Ten Bucks | 29 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Dave Till - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 08:39 AM EDT (#98654) #
Great report, Craig. A couple of comments:

The bat isn't flying. It's being flung, by a player who's too careless to keep his grip on the bat or use a little pine tar or a larger knob on the handle.

I don't think it's carelessness: I seem to recall reading that hitters are more effective when they don't grip their bats too tightly. I agree that if somebody's flinging their lumber all over the place, something needs to be done.

We'd like to do something about the problem that is: a) not prohibitively expensive

When I think of a baseball owner, I envision a "grasping, covetous old sinner" who spends his days sitting in a dank vault, running fistfuls of money through his hands and crooning quietly to himself.

Yet another indication that the plans to move the Expos are going nowhere.

I think that MLB has caught itself between a rock and a hard place. It's obvious, by now, that Montreal can support a baseball team if provided with ownership that actually cares about winning. But if Selig backs down on his commitment to move the Expos, he will be forced to admit that he was wrong and that his theories about baseball's economic problems are wrong - and he'll never do that. Besides, if the Expos actually announce that they are moving, somebody might step in with a lawsuit that threatens to expose some of baseball's shadier dealings. I suspect that the Montreal Traveling Road Show may remain in existence for some years to come.
_Crowfoot - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 10:37 AM EDT (#98655) #
Right, he's conservative so he's "thoroughly detestable." Gotcha.
_A - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 10:38 AM EDT (#98656) #
Got to run quickly, but in case anyone was wondering: The Canadian Baseball League is some of the worst baseball I`ve ever seen played. We played far superior teams in Tier 1 high school baseball than what was shown on the field yesterday in Trois Riviere (they were playing Saskatoon). The box score goes something like this: Saskatoon 20 20 4 Trois Riviere: 10 17 4...U-G-L-Y

Either way, there are four more games this week and I need my baseball fix ;-)
Craig B - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 10:40 AM EDT (#98657) #
I seem to recall reading that hitters are more effective when they don't grip their bats too tightly.

This is exactly right; gripping the bat too tightly leads to swing problems and you don't get the maximum amount of whip action in the swing because your forearms will tense up.

Most hitters are able to handle it.
Craig B - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 10:43 AM EDT (#98658) #
he's conservative so he's "thoroughly detestable."

I'm pretty conservative myself, "Crowfoot", I just don't like that reactionary crowd (and I don't like real estate developers a whole lot either). I did say "if you ask me"... I know a lot of people don't like it if you hold a contrary opinion, but I wouldn't hold much store by mine. We welcome all points of view here.
Mike D - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 10:54 AM EDT (#98659) #
Most conservatives are thoroughly detestable, and most thoroughly detestable people are conservative. But not *all* conservatives are *thoroughly* detestable, and it's a shame that anyone reading Batter's Box got the idea that the site would support such an insensitive and close-minded notion.

Oh, I guess I should have prefaced this with "If you ask me..."
Mike D - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 10:59 AM EDT (#98660) #
We do, of course, welcome all points of view here...including the oft-expressed view that "Mike D's an idiot." Then again, it's hard not to "welcome" the consensus opinion.
_nelly - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 11:58 AM EDT (#98661) #
Maybe Ahmad Chalabi could be president of the Washington Expos.... seems he has more friends there than Iraq :)
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 11:58 AM EDT (#98662) #
http://economics.about.com
I don't hate conservatives or liberals, but I **do** hate the overuse of these meaningless political terms. People who call themselves liberals in 2003 have absolutely nothing to do with the philosophies in the works of J.S. Mill or A.V. Dicey and in the last 25 years conservatives tend to be the ones calling for the most change to political institutions.

It's high time we consider proposals on their merits and not where they sit on some artibtrary liberal-conservative (or left-right) axis.

The Other Mike
_Jonny German - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 12:11 PM EDT (#98663) #
But if Selig backs down on his commitment to move the Expos, he will be forced to admit that he was wrong and that his theories about baseball's economic problems are wrong - and he'll never do that.

There's only one solution to the problem that is Bud Selig... Sandy Alderson needs to stage a coup.

In seriousness, does anyone see any hope that Bud Lite will be out of the commish's office soon enough that somebody with some sense can take over and save the Expos? How long does his term run? Do the owners generally pull out the rubber stamp when it comes time to renew a commsioner for another term?

A week or two ago, in supporting the All Star game format as-is, I said the only argument that it is inherently unfair to one league or the other would be related to the DH. Amazingly, nobody pointed out the fact that there are 14 AL teams and 16 NL. This gives the AL manager two extra picks to spend on legitimate "best players" rather than mandatory reps. This may well be a moot point given the ridiculous size of the rosters, but I'm just sayin'... shouldn't Bud have addressed this issue in some way? I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and guess that he recognized that this issue exists, but I'll also guess that he chose to ignore it in typical weasel fashion.
_David Armitage - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 12:17 PM EDT (#98664) #
J.S. Mill is overrated, his OPS was horrible last year and he strikes out way too much- they should put him on waivers and call up Jeremy Bentham.
_Jurgen - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 12:34 PM EDT (#98665) #
Brian Jordan is heading for knee surgery (likely but not definite)...

Great news for Jays fans. Think any of that Dodger pitching is available for everyone's favourite trading chip, Shannon Stewart?
_Craig S. - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 01:08 PM EDT (#98666) #
Nice job, Craig. Some interesting points.

My feeling is that MLB would be content to allow things to continue as they are in countries like the D.R. and Venezuela. At the risk of sounding cold, the deaths of a few prospects have little to do with the successful running of a ballclub. What the owners care about is the finished product, a player who can contribute to the team. If it takes a life of poverty, followed by a flurry of unsafe supplements as a teen, so be it.

I'd love to see them step in and do the right thing here. Yes, it will likely be expensive and difficult, but it could - and should - still be done. But I'm worried that this flareup of coverage will soon recede, and things will return to "normal".
_A - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 01:30 PM EDT (#98667) #
It`s not just liberals, our lovely capitalists are HARDLY keeping in line with Adam Smith...I think even Smith realized at the time there were detrimental flaws with a lack of social conscience. (Yeah, I did just imply that :p, and I`m not a liberal or Liberal)
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 03:30 PM EDT (#98668) #
http://economics.about.com
J.S. Mill is overrated, his OPS was horrible last year and he strikes out way too much- they should put him on waivers and call up Jeremy Bentham.

You have it exactly backwards.

Utilitarianism has parallels to the SF Giants:

Jeremy Bentham = Willie Mays
James Mill = Bobby Bonds
John Stuart Mill = Barry Bonds

Mike
_Adam Smith - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 03:33 PM EDT (#98669) #
I think even Smith realized at the time there were detrimental flaws with a lack of social conscience

Funny, I don't remember telling you what I "realized." Maybe you should read my book before you put words in my mouth. Go put words in Joe Morgan's mouth instead.
_Crowfoot - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 03:55 PM EDT (#98670) #
Craig, "that crowd" you refer to is hardly "reactionary" -- they're the ones pushing change in the world; you're the one reacting to it.
_A - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 04:21 PM EDT (#98671) #
I`ve had the *pleasure* of reading Smith on a few occasions, I guess I just assumed that an academic such as Smith would have learned and recognized such simple concepts like `social conscience`...Maybe I`ve given him too much credit. My apologies Adam.

For a baseball blog, going any further on this probably isn`t necessary...Though if anyone who has the ability to begin a thread starts one on traditional economic philosophies in relation to baseball that could yield interesting results :-)
Craig B - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 04:58 PM EDT (#98672) #
Oh, this is nonsensical. Adam Smith had a well-developed social conscience; he was anti-slavery, and his most important book, "The Theory of the Moral Sentiments" (The Wealth of Nations is a subsidiary volume to this more important work), puts forth his theory that people are born with a moral sense, and that it is accompanied by an innate feeling of fellowship that Smith calls "sympathy". It is the operation of sympathy, tempered by our moral sense, that creates our social conscience. It's innate, we cannot escape it, and it permeates everything we do including our economic relations.

Unlike those who think they've inherited his mantle, Adam Smith not only believed that there was such a thing as society, he believed that our economic relations went on inside of it, not outside of it, and that economic relations (though they helped to build the structures of our society on a moral basis) were subordinate to the relations of sympathy.

A, don't let intellectual bullies get the better of you!

Whoever "Adam Smith" is better own up to it; I hate shoving words back into anonymous faces. I'd like to know which intellectually bankrupt thug I should avoid talking to in the future.

Reading Smith is a pleasure, like all the Scottish philosophers... I recommend it highly.
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 04:59 PM EDT (#98673) #
http://economics.about.com
I guess I just assumed that an academic such as Smith would have learned and recognized such simple concepts like `social conscience`

It's a bit anachronistic to suggest that an 18th century economist would be interested in 1960's style concepts like 'social conscience'.

Mike
Craig B - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 05:28 PM EDT (#98674) #
1960's style concepts like 'social conscience'.

Well, as such, yes, but the concept is far from new, and certainly would have been comprehensible to post-Enlightenment intellectuals.

As its most basic expression, a "social conscience" is just not pushing old ladies out of your way into oncoming traffic. The fellow-feeling with other people that leads us not to do that is well-understood by almost everybody.

Mind you, there are those who would have us believe that it's inefficient to step around old ladies rather than push them out of the way (it is) and that as such we should bow to the "dictates of efficiency" (we shouldn't). There's a myriad simple phrase to describe people like this; you all can think of some I'm sure. :)
_Mick - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 06:55 PM EDT (#98675) #
don't let intellectual bullies get the better of you

Can't remember who originally said it, but remember ...
Academic arguments are inevitably so violent because the stakes are so small.

That said, the pedigree of John Stuart Mill seems a less vitriolic subject than, say, the merits of the designated hitter or the Hall of Fame worthiness of [insert your favorite Joe Carter/Dave Concepcion/Bill Buckner type candidate here].
_A - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 09:56 PM EDT (#98676) #
Well it`s even more blaitant than that Craig, with the invisible hand, Smith presumes that wealth is to be spread in all areas of society to make up for the loss of government intervention in social services (lets also keep in mind that during the 18th century funds gathered through taxation were being GROSSLY - yes, even worse than today - mismanaged). That means Smith *had* to have given some thought to those who were not so fortunate at the time (unless his theory was presented in bad faith because he wanted to hold the poor hostage).

Not even Smith himself could rise from the grave and contend that his ideological state is working even closely to plan anywhere in the world...Especially not the United States - no, I`m not bashing Americans as a hole, simply the minute percentage that compose their «elected» government. In fact, (just to be clear for Adam Smith) I really like America on paper...But then one might draw comparisons with the Mets who look like they could win a World Series based on potential talent, though in the end all it is, is false advertising.

...Trying to win an ideological battle behind a pseudo-name (referring to a different name than what you normally post with) slightly discredits your arguement, care to remove the mask Mr. Smith?
Pepper Moffatt - Wednesday, July 02 2003 @ 10:54 PM EDT (#98677) #
http://economics.about.com
The idea that the United States is a bastion of free market economics is a gross myth. Just look at the rate they subsidize farmers and industry compared to Canada, or their protectionist trade policies. In a **lot** of significant ways Canada is a lot more of a free-market economy than the United States is, even if I can't convince Steve Landsburg (I keep telling him, but he won't believe me).

It's a mistake to assume that the level of "freedom" in a market or the economy is directly proportional to income tax rates.

Generally speaking, the income distribution in countries with a heterogeneous population tended to be more skewed in communist countries than in capitalist ones. The wage ratio of white collar workers to blue collar workers in the Soviet Union was larger than that of America. Of course, in America you wouldn't get taken out and shot if you made a bad decision, so we can consider some of that wage differential as "hazard pay".

Mike
Pepper Moffatt - Tuesday, July 08 2003 @ 02:49 PM EDT (#98678) #
http://economics.about.com
I know this has become a dead thread, but I thought I'd mention one last thing.

The Fraser Institute came out with their yearly rankings on economic freedom. According to the institute, the United States isn't the most capitalist/free market state in the world. Here is their top six:

1. Hong Knog
2. Singapore
3. The United States
4. New Zealand
5. The United Kingdom
6. Canada

To learn more about the study, [ Reply to This ]
Pepper Moffatt - Tuesday, July 08 2003 @ 02:49 PM EDT (#98679) #
http://economics.about.com
I know this has become a dead thread, but I thought I'd mention one last thing.

The Fraser Institute came out with their yearly rankings on economic freedom. According to the institute, the United States isn't the most capitalist/free market state in the world. Here is their top six:

1. Hong Knog
2. Singapore
3. The United States
4. New Zealand
5. The United Kingdom
6. Canada

To learn more about the study, visit my site.

Mike
_Dan B - Sunday, July 20 2003 @ 09:40 PM EDT (#98680) #
Craig:

I am new to this site. What do you mean by FREE TERRMEL SLEDGE?
I am a friend of Terrmels and I am curious of your thoughts.
_benum - Sunday, July 20 2003 @ 10:12 PM EDT (#98681) #
Whenever a player is:
A) in the minors but deserves to be in the majors
OR
B) Is in the majors but not getting regular playing time

people will sometimes post "FREE "

I think the original campaign was FREE ERUBIEL DURAZO! (when he was with the Diamondbacks).
Craig B - Sunday, July 20 2003 @ 10:25 PM EDT (#98682) #
Dan,

After Guerrero, Vidro, and Wilkerson, Terrmel Sledge is possibly the best hitter in the Expos' system. He has had considerable success at every stop in his career, and the Expos have persisted in dicking him around, promoting other guys over him and generally playing ignorant to his central ability... Terrmel Sledge can get on base like a champ... an ability the Expos need more than ANY other single thing.

Sledge has shown that he can hit, and be at least an average major league hitter to boot (according to Baseball Prospectus's major league equivalencies, Sledge's performance this year in Ottawa is equivalent to an above-average major league hitter, just slightly below-average for all major league corner outfielders. That's just one example). Instead, the Expos have chosen to promote and play any number of mediocrities. Matt Cepicky, Jose Macias, Henry Mateo, and Endy Chavez have all had time in left field for the Expos this year. Jeff Liefer got considerable time on the bench. Wil Cordero, who isn't as good a hitter as Terrmel Sledge, has 300 plate appearances for the Expos this year. Ron Calloway has 225.

It is NOT RIGHT that Terrmel Sledge is still in Ottawa. It is unfair to him, it is unfair to his would-be teammates in Montreal, and it is unfair to Expos fans.

It is almost criminally incompetent on the Expos' part that Matt Cepicky has had two turns with the big club instead of Terrmel Sledge.

But mostly, as a (albeit recovering) Expos fan, I want him in the lineup, with Calloway and/or Cordero on the bench, to help the Expos win some ballgames!

So that's what I mean.
Notes : We'd Love To Help, Here's Ten Bucks | 29 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.